What do you think?
Rate this book
Power vs. Force #1
Power vs. Force: The Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior
This Edition includes several crucial updates since the original publication, including a more thorough explanation of the muscle-testing technique as well as changes to the text made by Dr. Hawkins as he read the book for an audio recording in 2006. David R. Hawkins details how anyone may resolve the most crucial of all human dilemmas: how to instantly determine the truth or falsehood of any statement or supposed fact. Dr. Hawkins, who worked as a "healing psychiatrist" during his long and distinguished career, uses theoretical concepts from particle physics, nonlinear dynamics, and chaos theory to support his study of human behavior. This is a fascinating work that will intrigue readers from all walks of life!
311 pages, Paperback
First published June 1, 1985
3,924 people are currently reading
31k people want to read
About the author
David R. Hawkins
281听books2,026听followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author by this name in the 欧宝娱乐 database.
Sir David Ramon Hawkins, M.D, Ph.D. was a nationally renowned psychiatrist, physician, researcher, spiritual teacher and lecturer.
Founding Director of the Institute for Spiritual Research, Inc. (1983) and Founder of the Path of Devotional Nonduality (2003), Dr. Hawkins lectured widely at such places as Westminster Abbey; Oxford Forum; Universities of Notre Dame, Michigan, Argentina, Fordham and Harvard; University of California (SF) Medical School; Institute of Noetic Sciences; and Agape Spiritual Center (Los Angeles). In addition, he has been an advisor to Catholic, Protestant, and Buddhist monasteries. He conferred with foreign governments on international diplomacy and has been instrumental in resolving long鈥搒tanding conflicts that were major threats to world peace.
He is featured in recent documentary films, magazines, and radio interviews (e.g., Oprah Radio and Institute of Noetic Sciences) for his work in the areas of health, healing, recovery, spirituality in modern life, consciousness research, and meditation.
Dr. Hawkins entered the field of medicine to alleviate human pain and distress, and his work as a physician was pioneering. As Medical Director of the North Nassau Mental Health Center (1956鈥�1980) and Director of Research at Brunswick Hospital (1968鈥�1979) on Long Island, his clinic was the largest practice in the United States, including a suite of twenty鈥揻ive offices, two thousand outpatients, and several research laboratories. In 1973, he co鈥揳uthored the ground鈥揵reaking work, Orthomolecular Psychiatry with Nobel Laureate chemist Linus Pauling, initiating a new field within psychiatry.
His clinical breakthroughs brought appearances on The Today Show, The Barbara Walters Show and The Mcneil/Leher News Hour. In the 1970s, he co鈥揻ounded several psychiatric organizations, including the Editorial Board of the Journal of Schizophrenia and the Attitudinal Healing Center in New York.
Many awards followed, such as The Huxley Award for the "Inestimable Contribution to the Alleviation of Human Suffering," Physicians Recognition Award by the American Medical Association, 50鈥揧ear Distinguished Life Fellow by the American Psychiatric Association, the Orthomolecular Medicine Hall of Fame, and a nomination for the prestigious Templeton Prize that honors progress in Science and Religion. In 1995, in a ceremony officiated by the H.H. Prince Valdemar of Schaumburg鈥揕ippe at the San Anselmo Theological Seminary, he became a knight of the Sovereign Order of the Hospitaliers of St. John of Jerusalem (founded in 1077) in recognition of his contributions to humanity.
Sir David Ramon Hawkins, M.D, Ph.D. was a nationally renowned psychiatrist, physician, researcher, spiritual teacher and lecturer.
Founding Director of the Institute for Spiritual Research, Inc. (1983) and Founder of the Path of Devotional Nonduality (2003), Dr. Hawkins lectured widely at such places as Westminster Abbey; Oxford Forum; Universities of Notre Dame, Michigan, Argentina, Fordham and Harvard; University of California (SF) Medical School; Institute of Noetic Sciences; and Agape Spiritual Center (Los Angeles). In addition, he has been an advisor to Catholic, Protestant, and Buddhist monasteries. He conferred with foreign governments on international diplomacy and has been instrumental in resolving long鈥搒tanding conflicts that were major threats to world peace.
He is featured in recent documentary films, magazines, and radio interviews (e.g., Oprah Radio and Institute of Noetic Sciences) for his work in the areas of health, healing, recovery, spirituality in modern life, consciousness research, and meditation.
Dr. Hawkins entered the field of medicine to alleviate human pain and distress, and his work as a physician was pioneering. As Medical Director of the North Nassau Mental Health Center (1956鈥�1980) and Director of Research at Brunswick Hospital (1968鈥�1979) on Long Island, his clinic was the largest practice in the United States, including a suite of twenty鈥揻ive offices, two thousand outpatients, and several research laboratories. In 1973, he co鈥揳uthored the ground鈥揵reaking work, Orthomolecular Psychiatry with Nobel Laureate chemist Linus Pauling, initiating a new field within psychiatry.
His clinical breakthroughs brought appearances on The Today Show, The Barbara Walters Show and The Mcneil/Leher News Hour. In the 1970s, he co鈥揻ounded several psychiatric organizations, including the Editorial Board of the Journal of Schizophrenia and the Attitudinal Healing Center in New York.
Many awards followed, such as The Huxley Award for the "Inestimable Contribution to the Alleviation of Human Suffering," Physicians Recognition Award by the American Medical Association, 50鈥揧ear Distinguished Life Fellow by the American Psychiatric Association, the Orthomolecular Medicine Hall of Fame, and a nomination for the prestigious Templeton Prize that honors progress in Science and Religion. In 1995, in a ceremony officiated by the H.H. Prince Valdemar of Schaumburg鈥揕ippe at the San Anselmo Theological Seminary, he became a knight of the Sovereign Order of the Hospitaliers of St. John of Jerusalem (founded in 1077) in recognition of his contributions to humanity.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 867 reviews
November 20, 2007
This is the most significant book I have read in a long time. Power Vs. Force explains the connection between individual levels of consciousness and human behavior.
This is important because every decision we make and every action we take is driven by our individual level of consciousness.
Dr. David R. Hawkins uses Applied Kinesiology as a tool for doing consciousness research. Using Applied Kinesiology, he developed a map of consciousness that ranges from 1 to 1000. According to consciousness research, Dr. Hawkins states that anything below 200 level of consciousness is negative, false, weak, Force therefore not life sustaining and anything above 200 is positive, true, Power and life sustaining.
Everything in our environment has an effect on our individual level of consciousness. TV, Books, People, Places, Objects, Food, Thoughts, etc . . .
The overall message of the book is that we have to avoid at all cost the things, people, places, products that fall below the critical level of 200 because they weaken us and they lower own level of consciousness. At the same time we have align ourselves with everything that is positive, true Power and life sustaining.
But how can know what to avoid and what to align with? Well in this book Dr. Hawkins presents a method for knowing that is so reliable its scary! With this method for calibrating the levels of consciousness of anything and anyone you will know the truth about anything you wish to know.
I highly recommend this book. This world needs for more people to develop a higher level of consciousness such as Jesus and Buddha for the benefit of all mankind.
This is important because every decision we make and every action we take is driven by our individual level of consciousness.
Dr. David R. Hawkins uses Applied Kinesiology as a tool for doing consciousness research. Using Applied Kinesiology, he developed a map of consciousness that ranges from 1 to 1000. According to consciousness research, Dr. Hawkins states that anything below 200 level of consciousness is negative, false, weak, Force therefore not life sustaining and anything above 200 is positive, true, Power and life sustaining.
Everything in our environment has an effect on our individual level of consciousness. TV, Books, People, Places, Objects, Food, Thoughts, etc . . .
The overall message of the book is that we have to avoid at all cost the things, people, places, products that fall below the critical level of 200 because they weaken us and they lower own level of consciousness. At the same time we have align ourselves with everything that is positive, true Power and life sustaining.
But how can know what to avoid and what to align with? Well in this book Dr. Hawkins presents a method for knowing that is so reliable its scary! With this method for calibrating the levels of consciousness of anything and anyone you will know the truth about anything you wish to know.
I highly recommend this book. This world needs for more people to develop a higher level of consciousness such as Jesus and Buddha for the benefit of all mankind.
November 4, 2012
This book is over-hyped by people who should know better. It supposedly proves that you can tell the truth of something by how much resistance your body puts up ("applied kinesiology") when someone asks you a yes or no question. They say "are you hungry?" and try to push your arm down, and if it holds firm, that means, "yes, time to eat." If your muscles react weakly and your arm falls to your side, that means "dude, I'm stuffed." What?!
Does that sound plausible? No. Common sense says, "this is ridiculous." That is because it is. This is pseudo-science, a waste of time, and not even interesting from the perspective of "hmm some people believe this crap?"
I was going to sell mine back to Amazon, but instead I thought, "this book is taking advantage of the weak-minded" and I tossed it in the trash.
Does that sound plausible? No. Common sense says, "this is ridiculous." That is because it is. This is pseudo-science, a waste of time, and not even interesting from the perspective of "hmm some people believe this crap?"
I was going to sell mine back to Amazon, but instead I thought, "this book is taking advantage of the weak-minded" and I tossed it in the trash.
June 29, 2020
4.75
膼峄峜 xong cu峄憂 n脿y th岷 m峄峣 th峄� r玫 nh瓢 ban ng脿y t岷 sao c贸 nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 v岷玭 m茫i kh么ng thay 膽峄昳, ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c l岷 qu谩 hay thay 膽峄昳, ho岷穋 m峄檛 v脿i ng瓢峄漣 h脿i l貌ng v峄沬 s峄� kh么ng thay 膽峄昳 l岷玭 thay 膽峄昳 trong cu峄檆 s峄憂g.
M峄梚 t芒m th峄ヽ t岷 ra m峄檛 tr瓢峄漬g n膬ng l瓢峄g, v岷瓂 n锚n 膽么i khi m矛nh cho r岷眓g 膽i峄乽 g矛 膽贸 r岷 hay th矛 ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c l岷 kh么ng, v脿 ng瓢峄 l岷. Hi峄僽 膽i峄乽 n脿y r峄搃 th矛 kh么ng c貌n 膽岷穞 c芒u h峄廼, kh么ng c貌n o谩n tr谩ch 膽i峄乽 n脿y 膽i峄乽 kia m脿 t岷璸 trung v脿o m峄� r峄檔g nh岷璶 th峄ヽ c峄 b岷 th芒n.
S岷� c贸 l脿m nhi峄乽 n峄檌 dung v脿 ph芒n t铆ch s芒u h啤n v峄� cu峄憂 n脿y.
4.75 膽岷 ti锚n c峄 n膬m nay th矛 ph岷, th岷璽 l脿 膽茫.
膼峄峜 xong cu峄憂 n脿y th岷 m峄峣 th峄� r玫 nh瓢 ban ng脿y t岷 sao c贸 nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 v岷玭 m茫i kh么ng thay 膽峄昳, ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c l岷 qu谩 hay thay 膽峄昳, ho岷穋 m峄檛 v脿i ng瓢峄漣 h脿i l貌ng v峄沬 s峄� kh么ng thay 膽峄昳 l岷玭 thay 膽峄昳 trong cu峄檆 s峄憂g.
M峄梚 t芒m th峄ヽ t岷 ra m峄檛 tr瓢峄漬g n膬ng l瓢峄g, v岷瓂 n锚n 膽么i khi m矛nh cho r岷眓g 膽i峄乽 g矛 膽贸 r岷 hay th矛 ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c l岷 kh么ng, v脿 ng瓢峄 l岷. Hi峄僽 膽i峄乽 n脿y r峄搃 th矛 kh么ng c貌n 膽岷穞 c芒u h峄廼, kh么ng c貌n o谩n tr谩ch 膽i峄乽 n脿y 膽i峄乽 kia m脿 t岷璸 trung v脿o m峄� r峄檔g nh岷璶 th峄ヽ c峄 b岷 th芒n.
S岷� c贸 l脿m nhi峄乽 n峄檌 dung v脿 ph芒n t铆ch s芒u h啤n v峄� cu峄憂 n脿y.
4.75 膽岷 ti锚n c峄 n膬m nay th矛 ph岷, th岷璽 l脿 膽茫.
December 16, 2016
"One of the worst books I have ever read. On par with The Secret and perhaps worse because this guy has an MD and claims to have a PhD (his PhD was acquired from a university later shutdown by the State of California for literally being a degree factory).
Here are some random thoughts because the book makes me too angry to even compose a thoughtful review:
He explains the levels of energy in one chapter (never really explaining how he could possibly measure this stuff), then he discusses cultures based on this same scale. There is no correlation. The sections could be in separate books. He basically implies that industrial societies never go to war...or that industries never exploit, etc. The more modern the society the higher the energy level. This must be comedic gold to anyone who has ever had their life destroyed. A fundamental truth of existence is that all people are flawed; some are better at some things than others and some are worse at some things than others and this is not mutually exclusive. He is separating personality traits as if an angry person is just angry all the time or a person who shows compassion is just compassionate all the time, or as if someone who is prideful can't also, in other circumstances, express acceptance or a willingness to act for others.
Energy Level 500 he calls love. But what he appears to be describing isn't love but the human desire for totality/wholeness/integrity/purity/etc. This may be a reasonable thing for an individual to do (though I doubt it, as it can never succeed) but socially and politically, such a quest has led to more death and unhappiness than any other idea/human desire in history. The argument of essence prior to existence underlies every genocidal/democidal regime in history, as well as all the major institutionalized and violent religions. The reason for this - as far as I can figure - is when you prioritize essence (or the whole) over existence (or specific people, places, things) what does it matter if you break a few eggs? What you are attempting to achieve is far more important than any one person's life. And though most people would at least argue that reason leads to the realization of essence over and above existence, he is trying to get us to ignore reason, which is worse. I get that he is advocating this for individuals, but very few people seem to be good at keeping their ideas and beliefs private any more.
To top it all off, he makes a bizarre scientific claim with absolutely no evidence re endorphins (there is no footnote).
Four pages later, he puts himself in the same energy level category as Jesus when he claims he has knowledge of the energy level of Jesus through his own personal experience. The man is not only a snake oil salesman, he is arrogant beyond anything.
I stopped reading around page 100. I NEVER fail to complete a book. But I just can't take this horseshit any longer. Absolutely horrible in every way."
Here are some random thoughts because the book makes me too angry to even compose a thoughtful review:
He explains the levels of energy in one chapter (never really explaining how he could possibly measure this stuff), then he discusses cultures based on this same scale. There is no correlation. The sections could be in separate books. He basically implies that industrial societies never go to war...or that industries never exploit, etc. The more modern the society the higher the energy level. This must be comedic gold to anyone who has ever had their life destroyed. A fundamental truth of existence is that all people are flawed; some are better at some things than others and some are worse at some things than others and this is not mutually exclusive. He is separating personality traits as if an angry person is just angry all the time or a person who shows compassion is just compassionate all the time, or as if someone who is prideful can't also, in other circumstances, express acceptance or a willingness to act for others.
Energy Level 500 he calls love. But what he appears to be describing isn't love but the human desire for totality/wholeness/integrity/purity/etc. This may be a reasonable thing for an individual to do (though I doubt it, as it can never succeed) but socially and politically, such a quest has led to more death and unhappiness than any other idea/human desire in history. The argument of essence prior to existence underlies every genocidal/democidal regime in history, as well as all the major institutionalized and violent religions. The reason for this - as far as I can figure - is when you prioritize essence (or the whole) over existence (or specific people, places, things) what does it matter if you break a few eggs? What you are attempting to achieve is far more important than any one person's life. And though most people would at least argue that reason leads to the realization of essence over and above existence, he is trying to get us to ignore reason, which is worse. I get that he is advocating this for individuals, but very few people seem to be good at keeping their ideas and beliefs private any more.
To top it all off, he makes a bizarre scientific claim with absolutely no evidence re endorphins (there is no footnote).
Four pages later, he puts himself in the same energy level category as Jesus when he claims he has knowledge of the energy level of Jesus through his own personal experience. The man is not only a snake oil salesman, he is arrogant beyond anything.
I stopped reading around page 100. I NEVER fail to complete a book. But I just can't take this horseshit any longer. Absolutely horrible in every way."
February 19, 2016
Brilliant book. It starts a bit slow but then after a couple of chapters it really picks up and unveils absolutely fascinating research on different levels of human consciousness. The book is filled with examples, and I could definitely relate to a lot of things being said about the influences of environments and people around us. This is an evergreen piece of material that people will be as fascinated a 100 years from now as I was reading it in today's time. Highly recommended for those who seek to expand their knowledge of human consciousness and really take your life to the next level.
July 31, 2010
This is an excellent book that speaks of the difference between power and force. Power is quiet and requires no explanation. Force is coercive and creates an automatic counterforce.
This has great applicability for couples, parents and bosses. Standing on the side of truth, justice and all that sustains life is power. This is strength of its own merit. Force represents all that is negative and life destructive.
Whenever you attempt to make someone do something that they don't want to do, you are applying force. We do this through any number of behaviors such as manipulating, blaming, guilting, bribing, complaining, criticizing and coercing. This always creates a counterforce. Whenever you attempt to coerce someone else, you create a measure of resistance. This resistance may not show itself in your presence but it will manifest in the world in some way.
People will undermine your authority, talk behind your back, rally other's support or confront you to your face. You cannot win with force. If you think you have, know that it is only temporary. What goes around comes around. Read the book. Its message is powerful!
This has great applicability for couples, parents and bosses. Standing on the side of truth, justice and all that sustains life is power. This is strength of its own merit. Force represents all that is negative and life destructive.
Whenever you attempt to make someone do something that they don't want to do, you are applying force. We do this through any number of behaviors such as manipulating, blaming, guilting, bribing, complaining, criticizing and coercing. This always creates a counterforce. Whenever you attempt to coerce someone else, you create a measure of resistance. This resistance may not show itself in your presence but it will manifest in the world in some way.
People will undermine your authority, talk behind your back, rally other's support or confront you to your face. You cannot win with force. If you think you have, know that it is only temporary. What goes around comes around. Read the book. Its message is powerful!
July 6, 2017
This was an interesting read, it's a terrible book, even a Bad book by several standards, but it was interesting to read as a case study. Having read some of the work of Noam Chomsky, and having become sensitive to what he called "institutional blindness," it was interesting recognize it in a fairly typical fashion in, of all places, a self-help book. Which, in retrospect, is not that surprising considering who this kind of literature is marketed to: middle to upper-class Americans and the perspective of the world that they are fed and live in.
I think there is value in self-help books. Eckart Tolle's "The Power of Now" touched me in different times of my life. Now I can see better the "product" aspect of that book. Just a gander at the main page of Eckart Tolle's website treats you to a heavenly airbrushed picture of Tolle's face 脿 la guru littered with suggestions for buying all kinds of products - pretty much the opposite of the message of the book. But that's how marketing goes in America. That book panders to that audience in subtle ways. When the great evils of the world are demonstrated it's always the communists who are used as examples while western crimes are tactfully omitted. However, there is something in the core message of that book that rings true, and Tolle concedes that whatever is written is merely a guidepost and nothing in it should not be taken as set in stone. In "Power vs Force" though, not only is the pandering ramped up considerably, but in contrast to "The Power of Now," David R. Hawkins is adamant that he is speaking the one unambiguous truth.
You need to look no further than the back cover, where pandering begins by displaying unsourced quotes by spiritual symbol and farce Mother Theresa, and business tycoon Lee Iacocca in praise of the book, suggesting that they both read it and took the time to comment on it, which I find very doubtful.
Flipping the book over we get its title in imposing black and white - Power vs. Force - and what an unfortunate title it is. Anyone who deigns to call himself a scientist, such as the author, billed as M.D., Ph.D., with a pretension to expound a scientific work, as he does, would be reticent to use terminology that already has an established use in science, such as Power (measured in watts) and Force (measured in newtons), but one step further, to cast them in opposition to each other, is even more confusing and idiotic. However, all this makes sense in light of the knowledge that this is a pseudoscientifical book, not actual science, so it works as foreshadowing.
I don't want to insult your intelligence by describing the method of the book but, to put it simply, the author claims that if you press down on the wrist of the extended arm of someone else while asking them a strictly Yes or No type question, regardless of whether the answerer knows the answer, they will either "go weak" if it is false, or "go strong" if it is true, and it is exactly on those vague terms that the book explains it, just matter-of-factly enough that you take this ludicrousness as something self-evident.
It would have been one thing if the author had used this as a study of people's biases to wanting something to be true or false, but what he claims is the opposite: he claims that, independently of the type of person and beliefs, literally any person has knowledge in their consciousness unaware to them extractable by this method. Which would mean that the most ardently patriotic German soldier at the height of the Third Reich would need only to have someone test him for the question "Is the Fuhrer a good guy?" to have his wrist "go weak" and be proved of that falsity. The author goes well beyond that though, claiming we can get the truth for everything ever this way. Alright.
Following the explanation of the method, using a combination of other pseudoscientific theories and simpleminded vague extrapolations from the latest physics discoveries it spend quite a few pages portraying this method as having the usual attributes of a Science: demonstrability, repeatability, success in double-blind experimentation. Only to immediately after warn that, like psychics and fortunetellers, it only works if you believe in it or, as they call it, that the experimenters "calibrate" over 200 on their bogus scale. I won't bore you with how they came upon this scale, so ridiculous that it is. If you really want to waste your time, read the book.
What struck me by this time was that, apparently, these tests and calibrations have been done since the 70s till the present day by different groups, demonstrating an astounding example of mass confirmation bias to rival that of the UFO convention people. Again it reminded me of Chomsky when he was talking about that group of researchers who had convinced themselves they had taught apes human sign language, later shown to be an advanced form of conditioning, not language learning. Yet the researchers were convinced they had succeeded, so strong was their confirmation bias. Funnily enough, later on in "Power vs. Force," Hawkins refers to these experiments unabashedly as true, as well as other classically debunked theories such as Kirlian photography showing the "soul" of objects. Everything is possible, when you want to believe.
He goes on to claim that skepticism and atheism and calibrate under 200, and by his own words, things that calibrate under 200 are "negative". So for a book that makes a big point about people's freedom, clearly their right to doubt when searching for the truth is demeaned. Of course, if I was the author, this is exactly what I'd want because it'd be the only way anyone would swallow the compounded silliness of the ideas of this book - strictly if you had no discernment whatsoever.
What follows after the reversal back into pseudoscience forms the bulk of the book: pages and pages of empty ideas about how in every field Power is good and Force is bad. I can describe all this writing with a Chomsky quote: "That's the whole point of good propaganda. You want to create a slogan that nobody's going to be against, and everybody's going to be for. Nobody knows what it means, because it doesn't mean anything." Basically, it boils down to this: Stalin is Force (or Bad), and Gandhi is Power (or Good), so why not call the book Good vs. Bad, you may ask, and it's a good question, I think it was simply to sound more fancy.
You get my point: the book is silly, it's garbage, but looking through it from Chomsky's perspective was interesting. From his analysis of the media he concluded that "The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace. It is their function to amuse, entertain, and inform, and to inculcate individuals with the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior that will integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society. In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this role requires systematic propaganda." I see "Power vs. Force" as the end product of this propaganda. The author's views on many aspects seem almost comically aligned with powerful interests, which is bewildering on such a spiritually slanted kind of book.
Here are some examples:
From Chomsky you learn that the current view of labor unions in America as a bad thing is a relatively recent phenomenon, a product of violent repression and effective propaganda in the past. To Hawkins, a product of this, they are as bad as communism, a mere "refuge for petty politicians."
(p. 176) "It is easy to forget that the initial appeal of communism was idealistic humanitarianism, as was that of the union movement in the United States, until it became a refuge of petty politicians."
According to Chomsky, there should be a pandering of the media to powerful people, for they are the ones in control in the background. Surreally we have this section which precludes any comment.
(p. 226) "When we come to know the powerful men of the world, captains of industry, presidents of banks, Nobel Prize winners, and members of legendary American families, it is striking to see how many are open, warm, sincere, and view success as a responsibility, noblesse oblige. These are truly successful people, notably courteous and considerate to all; whether visiting potentates or talking to servants, they treat everyone as an equal."
And yet a scarce few pages later, in defending some failed paper of his about nutrition:
(p. 233) "The paper was largely ignored in the United States because there was still no paradigm to give it credibility. The medical profession has simply been uninterested in nutrition, and organized medicine has traditionally been less than kind to innovators. It is helpful to remember that it is a foible of human nature to stoutly defend an established position despite overwhelming evidence against it."
It is as if Hawkins knows rationally that people are controlled by propaganda, but completely blind that could be a part of that group:
(p. 256) "It seems that society institutionalizes certain self-propagating levels of consciousness that become an ingrained characteristic of various social strata."
It's important to remember that the book was published in 1985, so one would expect, given the record so far, that Hawkins would expound views uncontroversial to middle-class people of the time, which he does, denouncing heavy metal and videogames as corruptors of children, though we can see now in 2017 how what great vehicles for art and expression they came to be. I think that, had the book been written today, seeing the financial success of these things and their impact on society, he'd have a different view: whatever view would be the popular view today.
I have to mention Hawkins' calibrations of religions. Apparently, the original teaching of Jesus, Buddha and Lord Krishna (which I wasn't aware was a real person) are 1000, "the highest attainable on this plane." The calibrations have faded predictably to lesser levels. Original Judaism calibrated at 985. Pretty good, but just so you know inferior than Christianity. Apparently though, "Modern Judaism" is only 499, the upward limit on Hawkins' "Map of Consciousness 庐" for the "Reason" stage, but not enough to get into the "Love" stage, as if to say: "Yeah, Jews are good with worldly stuff like money, but they're a far cry from true spirituality like us Christians."
For Islam, apparently Mohamed s teachings calibrate at 700 proving once again that Jesus is the main dog, and following that there is only mention that fundamentalist movements have dropped that figure to between 90 and 130, well below the threshold level of goodness of 200. This last kind of selection of framing opinions and selective omissions conforms to Chomsky's theory. In this case, to the dogma of American government since the Russians stopped being the scapegoat in the 80s to the present day that the Islamic Middle East is Public Enemy No. 1.
The cherry on top for me is that the so-called "Map of Consciousness" table mentioned before is indeed labeled with the "庐" trademark symbol just as I wrote above, revealing in the most simplest way what this book, which apparently "calibrates" at 700 is - a product, empty of content and full of bullshit. There are many more contradictions and senseless stuff I could talk about, but it would be a waste to spend one more minute in talking about this book.
The person who lent me this book did it because, "since I enjoyed 'The Power of Now,' I'd be sure to like this." I'm as flabbergasted at that opinion as I am about all the positive reviews I see about this book on 欧宝娱乐. I'm going to return it today and I honestly don't know what to say when he asks "What did you think of it?"
I think I'll go with: "It didn't speak to me."
I think there is value in self-help books. Eckart Tolle's "The Power of Now" touched me in different times of my life. Now I can see better the "product" aspect of that book. Just a gander at the main page of Eckart Tolle's website treats you to a heavenly airbrushed picture of Tolle's face 脿 la guru littered with suggestions for buying all kinds of products - pretty much the opposite of the message of the book. But that's how marketing goes in America. That book panders to that audience in subtle ways. When the great evils of the world are demonstrated it's always the communists who are used as examples while western crimes are tactfully omitted. However, there is something in the core message of that book that rings true, and Tolle concedes that whatever is written is merely a guidepost and nothing in it should not be taken as set in stone. In "Power vs Force" though, not only is the pandering ramped up considerably, but in contrast to "The Power of Now," David R. Hawkins is adamant that he is speaking the one unambiguous truth.
You need to look no further than the back cover, where pandering begins by displaying unsourced quotes by spiritual symbol and farce Mother Theresa, and business tycoon Lee Iacocca in praise of the book, suggesting that they both read it and took the time to comment on it, which I find very doubtful.
Flipping the book over we get its title in imposing black and white - Power vs. Force - and what an unfortunate title it is. Anyone who deigns to call himself a scientist, such as the author, billed as M.D., Ph.D., with a pretension to expound a scientific work, as he does, would be reticent to use terminology that already has an established use in science, such as Power (measured in watts) and Force (measured in newtons), but one step further, to cast them in opposition to each other, is even more confusing and idiotic. However, all this makes sense in light of the knowledge that this is a pseudoscientifical book, not actual science, so it works as foreshadowing.
I don't want to insult your intelligence by describing the method of the book but, to put it simply, the author claims that if you press down on the wrist of the extended arm of someone else while asking them a strictly Yes or No type question, regardless of whether the answerer knows the answer, they will either "go weak" if it is false, or "go strong" if it is true, and it is exactly on those vague terms that the book explains it, just matter-of-factly enough that you take this ludicrousness as something self-evident.
It would have been one thing if the author had used this as a study of people's biases to wanting something to be true or false, but what he claims is the opposite: he claims that, independently of the type of person and beliefs, literally any person has knowledge in their consciousness unaware to them extractable by this method. Which would mean that the most ardently patriotic German soldier at the height of the Third Reich would need only to have someone test him for the question "Is the Fuhrer a good guy?" to have his wrist "go weak" and be proved of that falsity. The author goes well beyond that though, claiming we can get the truth for everything ever this way. Alright.
Following the explanation of the method, using a combination of other pseudoscientific theories and simpleminded vague extrapolations from the latest physics discoveries it spend quite a few pages portraying this method as having the usual attributes of a Science: demonstrability, repeatability, success in double-blind experimentation. Only to immediately after warn that, like psychics and fortunetellers, it only works if you believe in it or, as they call it, that the experimenters "calibrate" over 200 on their bogus scale. I won't bore you with how they came upon this scale, so ridiculous that it is. If you really want to waste your time, read the book.
What struck me by this time was that, apparently, these tests and calibrations have been done since the 70s till the present day by different groups, demonstrating an astounding example of mass confirmation bias to rival that of the UFO convention people. Again it reminded me of Chomsky when he was talking about that group of researchers who had convinced themselves they had taught apes human sign language, later shown to be an advanced form of conditioning, not language learning. Yet the researchers were convinced they had succeeded, so strong was their confirmation bias. Funnily enough, later on in "Power vs. Force," Hawkins refers to these experiments unabashedly as true, as well as other classically debunked theories such as Kirlian photography showing the "soul" of objects. Everything is possible, when you want to believe.
He goes on to claim that skepticism and atheism and calibrate under 200, and by his own words, things that calibrate under 200 are "negative". So for a book that makes a big point about people's freedom, clearly their right to doubt when searching for the truth is demeaned. Of course, if I was the author, this is exactly what I'd want because it'd be the only way anyone would swallow the compounded silliness of the ideas of this book - strictly if you had no discernment whatsoever.
What follows after the reversal back into pseudoscience forms the bulk of the book: pages and pages of empty ideas about how in every field Power is good and Force is bad. I can describe all this writing with a Chomsky quote: "That's the whole point of good propaganda. You want to create a slogan that nobody's going to be against, and everybody's going to be for. Nobody knows what it means, because it doesn't mean anything." Basically, it boils down to this: Stalin is Force (or Bad), and Gandhi is Power (or Good), so why not call the book Good vs. Bad, you may ask, and it's a good question, I think it was simply to sound more fancy.
You get my point: the book is silly, it's garbage, but looking through it from Chomsky's perspective was interesting. From his analysis of the media he concluded that "The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace. It is their function to amuse, entertain, and inform, and to inculcate individuals with the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior that will integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society. In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this role requires systematic propaganda." I see "Power vs. Force" as the end product of this propaganda. The author's views on many aspects seem almost comically aligned with powerful interests, which is bewildering on such a spiritually slanted kind of book.
Here are some examples:
From Chomsky you learn that the current view of labor unions in America as a bad thing is a relatively recent phenomenon, a product of violent repression and effective propaganda in the past. To Hawkins, a product of this, they are as bad as communism, a mere "refuge for petty politicians."
(p. 176) "It is easy to forget that the initial appeal of communism was idealistic humanitarianism, as was that of the union movement in the United States, until it became a refuge of petty politicians."
According to Chomsky, there should be a pandering of the media to powerful people, for they are the ones in control in the background. Surreally we have this section which precludes any comment.
(p. 226) "When we come to know the powerful men of the world, captains of industry, presidents of banks, Nobel Prize winners, and members of legendary American families, it is striking to see how many are open, warm, sincere, and view success as a responsibility, noblesse oblige. These are truly successful people, notably courteous and considerate to all; whether visiting potentates or talking to servants, they treat everyone as an equal."
And yet a scarce few pages later, in defending some failed paper of his about nutrition:
(p. 233) "The paper was largely ignored in the United States because there was still no paradigm to give it credibility. The medical profession has simply been uninterested in nutrition, and organized medicine has traditionally been less than kind to innovators. It is helpful to remember that it is a foible of human nature to stoutly defend an established position despite overwhelming evidence against it."
It is as if Hawkins knows rationally that people are controlled by propaganda, but completely blind that could be a part of that group:
(p. 256) "It seems that society institutionalizes certain self-propagating levels of consciousness that become an ingrained characteristic of various social strata."
It's important to remember that the book was published in 1985, so one would expect, given the record so far, that Hawkins would expound views uncontroversial to middle-class people of the time, which he does, denouncing heavy metal and videogames as corruptors of children, though we can see now in 2017 how what great vehicles for art and expression they came to be. I think that, had the book been written today, seeing the financial success of these things and their impact on society, he'd have a different view: whatever view would be the popular view today.
I have to mention Hawkins' calibrations of religions. Apparently, the original teaching of Jesus, Buddha and Lord Krishna (which I wasn't aware was a real person) are 1000, "the highest attainable on this plane." The calibrations have faded predictably to lesser levels. Original Judaism calibrated at 985. Pretty good, but just so you know inferior than Christianity. Apparently though, "Modern Judaism" is only 499, the upward limit on Hawkins' "Map of Consciousness 庐" for the "Reason" stage, but not enough to get into the "Love" stage, as if to say: "Yeah, Jews are good with worldly stuff like money, but they're a far cry from true spirituality like us Christians."
For Islam, apparently Mohamed s teachings calibrate at 700 proving once again that Jesus is the main dog, and following that there is only mention that fundamentalist movements have dropped that figure to between 90 and 130, well below the threshold level of goodness of 200. This last kind of selection of framing opinions and selective omissions conforms to Chomsky's theory. In this case, to the dogma of American government since the Russians stopped being the scapegoat in the 80s to the present day that the Islamic Middle East is Public Enemy No. 1.
The cherry on top for me is that the so-called "Map of Consciousness" table mentioned before is indeed labeled with the "庐" trademark symbol just as I wrote above, revealing in the most simplest way what this book, which apparently "calibrates" at 700 is - a product, empty of content and full of bullshit. There are many more contradictions and senseless stuff I could talk about, but it would be a waste to spend one more minute in talking about this book.
The person who lent me this book did it because, "since I enjoyed 'The Power of Now,' I'd be sure to like this." I'm as flabbergasted at that opinion as I am about all the positive reviews I see about this book on 欧宝娱乐. I'm going to return it today and I honestly don't know what to say when he asks "What did you think of it?"
I think I'll go with: "It didn't speak to me."
November 30, 2018
This book was like a person covered in marshmallow fluff wanting to hug you.
Total fail. I don't know what my brain thought when I saw this and ordered it, but definitely not this. I think some people would categorize this as hippy-dippy, but for me it seemed like a rather disturbing amalgamation from the bits I skimmed. I started with the Preface and went, 'Hmm...'; then moved onto to the Introduction and was like, 'Well, there's that'; and finally, just started reading opening and closing paragraphs of each section, concluding that this was really not a me book. Maybe wayback, like when I was 15.
Total fail. I don't know what my brain thought when I saw this and ordered it, but definitely not this. I think some people would categorize this as hippy-dippy, but for me it seemed like a rather disturbing amalgamation from the bits I skimmed. I started with the Preface and went, 'Hmm...'; then moved onto to the Introduction and was like, 'Well, there's that'; and finally, just started reading opening and closing paragraphs of each section, concluding that this was really not a me book. Maybe wayback, like when I was 15.
May 6, 2020
丕賱賯賵丞 賲賯丕亘賱 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴
丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱禺賮賷丞 禺賱賮 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱亘卮乇賷
鬲兀賱賷賮 : 丿.丿賷賮賷丿 乇. 賴丕賵賰賷賳夭
胤亘毓丞 : 丿丕乇 丕賱禺賷丕賱
毓丿丿 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 : 335
賳賵毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘: 鬲賳賲賷丞 匕丕鬲賷丞
鬲乇噩賲賭丞 : 毓丕氐賲 賳.毓賱賷 賵 兀乇噩賵丕賳 亘賳鬲 爻賱賷賲丕賳
.
.
賲賭乇丕噩賭毓丞 :
.
廿賯鬲亘丕爻
.
"賱賷爻 丕賱賯亘賵賱 卮賰賱丕賸 賲賳 兀卮賰丕賱 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞 亘賱 賴賵 丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丿賵賳 廿禺囟丕毓賴丕 賱兀噩賳丿丞 賲丕"
氐90
.
" 賮兀爻卅賱鬲賳丕 賴賷 賲噩乇丿 丕賳毓賰丕爻 賱丿賵丕賮毓賳丕 賵兀賴丿丕賮賳丕 賵賲爻鬲賵賶 賵毓賷賳丕. 賵賲賳 丕賱賲賮賷丿 賯賷丕爻 兀爻卅賱鬲賳丕 賲賳 丨賷賳 廿賱賶 丌禺乇貙 賵賱賷爻 丕賱兀噩賵亘丞 賮丨爻亘 "
氐112
.
賷鬲賳丕賵賱 賴丕賵賰賷賳夭 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴 賴匕丕 賲賮賴賵賲 鬲丕孬賷乇 丕賱賰賳爻賷賵賱賶噩賷丕 ( 毓賱賲 丕賱丨乇賰丞 ) 丕賱鬲胤亘賷賯賷 賵毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賵丕賱匕賷 賵囟毓 賱賴 爻賱賲 賲丕 亘賷賳 1 廿賱賶 1000 賵丨賷孬 廿賳 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賶 200 賷賲孬賱 兀丿賳賶 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 賮賷 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賮賰賷賮 賷鬲丕孬乇 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 毓賱賲 丕賱丨乇賰丞責! 賵賲丕 鬲丕孬賷乇 丕賱丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱丿賳賷丕 賲賳 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 毓賱賶 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 賵賴賱 鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賵 丕賰鬲爻丕亘 賳賯丕胤 廿囟丕賮賷丞 賱乇賮毓 賲爻鬲賵賶 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 亘丕賱卮卅 丕賱匕賷 賲賲賰賳 廿賰鬲爻丕亘賴 丕賲 賴賵 賲賵乇賵孬 噩賷賳賷 賱丕 賲賳丕氐 賲賳 鬲睾賷賷乇賴責!
.
丕賱賯賵丞 賲賯丕亘賱 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 丕賱毓賳賵丕賳 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賷賳 鬲賰賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賯賵丞 賵賲丕匕丕 鬲賵丕噩賴 賵賱賲丕匕丕 鬲乇鬲亘胤 亘賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 責!
.
賰賱 匕賱賰 賵兀賰孬乇 鬲噩丿 廿噩丕亘鬲賴 亘丕爻鬲賮丕囟丞 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 賯乇丕亍鬲賰 賱賱賰鬲丕亘.
.
.
丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲 :
.
丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 丕賱胤賵賷賱丞 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 丨賷孬 鬲鬲噩丕賵夭 48 氐賮丨丞 丨鬲賶 鬲亘丿兀 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賵亘丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 丕賳 氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲氐賱 丕賱賶 335 氐賮丨丞 丕賱丕 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷賳鬲賴賷 毓賳丿 丕賱氐賮丨丞 264 賵丕賱亘賯賷丞 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 賲乇賮賯丕鬲 賵鬲毓乇賷賮丕鬲 賱賱賲氐胤賱丨丕鬲 賵丕賱賲乇丕噩毓 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻鬲禺丿賲賴丕 丕賱賲丐賱賮.
.
賱賲 兀噩丿 廿囟丕賮丞 賰亘賷乇丞 毓賳 賰鬲丕亘 丕賱爻賲丕丨 亘丕賱乇丨賷賱 丨賷孬 丕賳賴賲 賷鬲賯丕胤毓賵賳 賮賷 丕賴賲 賲丨賵乇 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 賵賴賵 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷.
.
丕賱丕胤丕賱丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱賮賯乇丕鬲 丿賵賳 丿丕毓賷 賵丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕丿 丕賱賶 亘毓囟 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賲賰乇乇丞 賮賷 氐賮丨丕鬲 爻丕亘賯丞.
.
賱丕 丕賳賰乇 亘丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 噩賷丿 賵毓夭夭 賲賮賴賵賲 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賵兀賴賲賷鬲賴 賵賰賷賮賷丞 丕賱丕爻鬲賮丕丿丞 賲賳賴 亘毓丿 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 賲噩丿丿丕賸 .. 兀賲賳丨 賲丕 賯囟賷鬲賴 賲賳 賵賯鬲 賲毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘賭馃専馃専馃専 .
.
賲賱丕丨馗賭丞 : 丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 賵噩賴丞 賳馗乇賷 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賷 賯丿 鬲鬲卮丕亘賴 丕賵 鬲禺鬲賱賮 賵匕賱賰 賵丕乇丿 賮賷 兀睾賱亘 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳.
.
#丕賱賯賵丞_賲賯丕亘賱_丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 #丿賷賮賷丿_賴丕賵賰賷賳夭 #丿丕乇_丕賱禺賷丕賱
丕賱賲乇丕噩毓丞 毓賱賶 丨爻丕亘 丕賱丕賳爻鬲賯乇丕賲 馃憞馃徎馃槉
丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱禺賮賷丞 禺賱賮 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱亘卮乇賷
鬲兀賱賷賮 : 丿.丿賷賮賷丿 乇. 賴丕賵賰賷賳夭
胤亘毓丞 : 丿丕乇 丕賱禺賷丕賱
毓丿丿 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 : 335
賳賵毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘: 鬲賳賲賷丞 匕丕鬲賷丞
鬲乇噩賲賭丞 : 毓丕氐賲 賳.毓賱賷 賵 兀乇噩賵丕賳 亘賳鬲 爻賱賷賲丕賳
.
.
賲賭乇丕噩賭毓丞 :
.
廿賯鬲亘丕爻
.
"賱賷爻 丕賱賯亘賵賱 卮賰賱丕賸 賲賳 兀卮賰丕賱 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞 亘賱 賴賵 丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丿賵賳 廿禺囟丕毓賴丕 賱兀噩賳丿丞 賲丕"
氐90
.
" 賮兀爻卅賱鬲賳丕 賴賷 賲噩乇丿 丕賳毓賰丕爻 賱丿賵丕賮毓賳丕 賵兀賴丿丕賮賳丕 賵賲爻鬲賵賶 賵毓賷賳丕. 賵賲賳 丕賱賲賮賷丿 賯賷丕爻 兀爻卅賱鬲賳丕 賲賳 丨賷賳 廿賱賶 丌禺乇貙 賵賱賷爻 丕賱兀噩賵亘丞 賮丨爻亘 "
氐112
.
賷鬲賳丕賵賱 賴丕賵賰賷賳夭 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴 賴匕丕 賲賮賴賵賲 鬲丕孬賷乇 丕賱賰賳爻賷賵賱賶噩賷丕 ( 毓賱賲 丕賱丨乇賰丞 ) 丕賱鬲胤亘賷賯賷 賵毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賵丕賱匕賷 賵囟毓 賱賴 爻賱賲 賲丕 亘賷賳 1 廿賱賶 1000 賵丨賷孬 廿賳 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賶 200 賷賲孬賱 兀丿賳賶 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 賮賷 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賮賰賷賮 賷鬲丕孬乇 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 毓賱賲 丕賱丨乇賰丞責! 賵賲丕 鬲丕孬賷乇 丕賱丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱丿賳賷丕 賲賳 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 毓賱賶 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 賵賴賱 鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賵 丕賰鬲爻丕亘 賳賯丕胤 廿囟丕賮賷丞 賱乇賮毓 賲爻鬲賵賶 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 亘丕賱卮卅 丕賱匕賷 賲賲賰賳 廿賰鬲爻丕亘賴 丕賲 賴賵 賲賵乇賵孬 噩賷賳賷 賱丕 賲賳丕氐 賲賳 鬲睾賷賷乇賴責!
.
丕賱賯賵丞 賲賯丕亘賱 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 丕賱毓賳賵丕賳 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賷賳 鬲賰賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賯賵丞 賵賲丕匕丕 鬲賵丕噩賴 賵賱賲丕匕丕 鬲乇鬲亘胤 亘賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 責!
.
賰賱 匕賱賰 賵兀賰孬乇 鬲噩丿 廿噩丕亘鬲賴 亘丕爻鬲賮丕囟丞 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 賯乇丕亍鬲賰 賱賱賰鬲丕亘.
.
.
丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲 :
.
丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 丕賱胤賵賷賱丞 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 丨賷孬 鬲鬲噩丕賵夭 48 氐賮丨丞 丨鬲賶 鬲亘丿兀 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賵亘丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 丕賳 氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲氐賱 丕賱賶 335 氐賮丨丞 丕賱丕 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷賳鬲賴賷 毓賳丿 丕賱氐賮丨丞 264 賵丕賱亘賯賷丞 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 賲乇賮賯丕鬲 賵鬲毓乇賷賮丕鬲 賱賱賲氐胤賱丨丕鬲 賵丕賱賲乇丕噩毓 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻鬲禺丿賲賴丕 丕賱賲丐賱賮.
.
賱賲 兀噩丿 廿囟丕賮丞 賰亘賷乇丞 毓賳 賰鬲丕亘 丕賱爻賲丕丨 亘丕賱乇丨賷賱 丨賷孬 丕賳賴賲 賷鬲賯丕胤毓賵賳 賮賷 丕賴賲 賲丨賵乇 賱賱賰鬲丕亘 賵賴賵 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷.
.
丕賱丕胤丕賱丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱賮賯乇丕鬲 丿賵賳 丿丕毓賷 賵丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕丿 丕賱賶 亘毓囟 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賲賰乇乇丞 賮賷 氐賮丨丕鬲 爻丕亘賯丞.
.
賱丕 丕賳賰乇 亘丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 噩賷丿 賵毓夭夭 賲賮賴賵賲 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賵兀賴賲賷鬲賴 賵賰賷賮賷丞 丕賱丕爻鬲賮丕丿丞 賲賳賴 亘毓丿 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 賲噩丿丿丕賸 .. 兀賲賳丨 賲丕 賯囟賷鬲賴 賲賳 賵賯鬲 賲毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘賭馃専馃専馃専 .
.
賲賱丕丨馗賭丞 : 丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 賵噩賴丞 賳馗乇賷 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賷 賯丿 鬲鬲卮丕亘賴 丕賵 鬲禺鬲賱賮 賵匕賱賰 賵丕乇丿 賮賷 兀睾賱亘 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳.
.
#丕賱賯賵丞_賲賯丕亘賱_丕賱廿賰乇丕賴 #丿賷賮賷丿_賴丕賵賰賷賳夭 #丿丕乇_丕賱禺賷丕賱
丕賱賲乇丕噩毓丞 毓賱賶 丨爻丕亘 丕賱丕賳爻鬲賯乇丕賲 馃憞馃徎馃槉
February 4, 2008
I love delving into the inexplainable and the unseen. My entire life I have been on a search for truth, trying to decipher the good from the bad. This book makes it into the good pile. I'm eagerly waiting to try out kinesiology and see if it works as described in the book.
This book focuses on the deciphering what is true and what is false through applied kinesiology. I must admit it seems absolutely unscientific, the technique itself is very controversial. Through applied kinesiology the author has formulated a ladder of consciousness 0 - 1000. Lower levels of human consciousness register below 200, while levels of consciousness such as unconditional love register around 500. Those who reach enlightenment register between 700 and 1000 - which according to author very few ever reach this level.
Moving beyond the controversial methodology to formulate his theories, there are some ideas that resonated with me. The M pattern - which is described as an attractor pattern for human accomplishment. For example, the 4 minute mile for a long time was considered impossible, however once the goal was reached an attractor pattern was revealed to "human consciousness" and the 4 minute mile came into the realm of possible - others began to replicate and improve upon this feat.
Linear vs non-linear causality. Linear causality would look something like this A > B > C. Non-linear is more organic. Your thoughts, feelings, and beliefs influence the outcome, moreso than an action causing another action. This falls into the realm of The Secret - which many view as quackery. Personally, I think there is truth there but science has not caught up and "proved" it yet.
I've had a lot of personal experiences where I have focused on and attracted certain outcomes and things to my life. If I used these techniques more often I'd probably be living a better life, but I am sometimes thwarted by my own cynicisms.
If anything, this book provides some good food for thought.
This book focuses on the deciphering what is true and what is false through applied kinesiology. I must admit it seems absolutely unscientific, the technique itself is very controversial. Through applied kinesiology the author has formulated a ladder of consciousness 0 - 1000. Lower levels of human consciousness register below 200, while levels of consciousness such as unconditional love register around 500. Those who reach enlightenment register between 700 and 1000 - which according to author very few ever reach this level.
Moving beyond the controversial methodology to formulate his theories, there are some ideas that resonated with me. The M pattern - which is described as an attractor pattern for human accomplishment. For example, the 4 minute mile for a long time was considered impossible, however once the goal was reached an attractor pattern was revealed to "human consciousness" and the 4 minute mile came into the realm of possible - others began to replicate and improve upon this feat.
Linear vs non-linear causality. Linear causality would look something like this A > B > C. Non-linear is more organic. Your thoughts, feelings, and beliefs influence the outcome, moreso than an action causing another action. This falls into the realm of The Secret - which many view as quackery. Personally, I think there is truth there but science has not caught up and "proved" it yet.
I've had a lot of personal experiences where I have focused on and attracted certain outcomes and things to my life. If I used these techniques more often I'd probably be living a better life, but I am sometimes thwarted by my own cynicisms.
If anything, this book provides some good food for thought.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
August 19, 2022
膼芒y l脿 m峄檛 cu峄憂 kh么 v脿 kh贸 膽峄峜 nh岷 t峄� tr瓢峄沜 膽岷縩 nay v峄沬 m矛nh...
Nh瓢 膽峄峜 m峄檛 quy峄僴 gi谩o tr矛nh lu么n c谩c b岷 啤i
Nh瓢ng m脿 k ph峄� nh岷璶 ch峄� 膽峄� c峄 n贸 r岷 hay v脿 life changing n锚n nh峄痭g b岷 n脿o mu峄憂 hi峄僽 v峄� kh谩i ni峄噈 tr瓢峄漬g n膬ng l瓢峄g c谩c th峄� nh谩
L峄漣 khuy锚n ch芒n th脿nh l脿 c谩c b岷 c贸 th峄� skip t岷 50 trang 膽岷 cu峄憂 n脿y v矛 n贸 ch峄� nh瓢 l脿 ph岷 gi峄沬 thi峄噓 nghi锚n c峄﹗ tr瓢峄沜 khi v脿o n峄檌 dung 铆 n锚n 膽峄峜 kh贸 hi峄僽 l岷痬 =))))
B峄� 铆ch nh瓢ng m脿 kh么 qu谩 n锚n huhu cho 3.75 ...
Ki峄僽 膽峄峜 quy峄僴 n脿y l脿m m矛nh su媒t s峄� 膽峄峜 s谩ch lu么n 铆 c谩c b岷 =)))
Nh瓢 膽峄峜 m峄檛 quy峄僴 gi谩o tr矛nh lu么n c谩c b岷 啤i
Nh瓢ng m脿 k ph峄� nh岷璶 ch峄� 膽峄� c峄 n贸 r岷 hay v脿 life changing n锚n nh峄痭g b岷 n脿o mu峄憂 hi峄僽 v峄� kh谩i ni峄噈 tr瓢峄漬g n膬ng l瓢峄g c谩c th峄� nh谩
L峄漣 khuy锚n ch芒n th脿nh l脿 c谩c b岷 c贸 th峄� skip t岷 50 trang 膽岷 cu峄憂 n脿y v矛 n贸 ch峄� nh瓢 l脿 ph岷 gi峄沬 thi峄噓 nghi锚n c峄﹗ tr瓢峄沜 khi v脿o n峄檌 dung 铆 n锚n 膽峄峜 kh贸 hi峄僽 l岷痬 =))))
B峄� 铆ch nh瓢ng m脿 kh么 qu谩 n锚n huhu cho 3.75 ...
Ki峄僽 膽峄峜 quy峄僴 n脿y l脿m m矛nh su媒t s峄� 膽峄峜 s谩ch lu么n 铆 c谩c b岷 =)))
April 29, 2016
ENLIGHTENED: STRONGLY RECOMMEND FOR THOSE STRUGGLING WITH TRUTH
David R. Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D. has established a powerful measure of consciousness .
Substantial conceptualization of human behavior .Fresh view on how your body expounds and reacts to people and objects around us . A intellectual description of aggressive behavior .
A challenging read . But worth the endeavor. Looking forward to reading more from this brilliant man and magnificent writer
THINK: VALOR VS. RAGE
David R. Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D. has established a powerful measure of consciousness .
Substantial conceptualization of human behavior .Fresh view on how your body expounds and reacts to people and objects around us . A intellectual description of aggressive behavior .
A challenging read . But worth the endeavor. Looking forward to reading more from this brilliant man and magnificent writer
THINK: VALOR VS. RAGE
March 15, 2008
This is an amazing book that details, (from subtitle) "The Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior". It is engaging to peek into the psychology, both conscious and subconscious, of the underlying behavior patterns and choices made throughout life. Yes, you may find this book on the self help shelves (shudder!), but in this case, it will actually help many of us to overcome negative behaviors, converting them into positives. As I like to say, we can all use less "nega-thought" and more "posi-thought" in our lives, eh?
September 30, 2011
Disclaimer: I read this for a friend, and tried very hard to give it a fair read. And in fact, the primary cosmological argument wasn't as crazy as I suspected, although with all the benefit of the doubt, the epistemic and axiological implications are still dumbfounding.
PvF is not really the self-help para-spirituality that it seems on hearing a review. For instance, Hawkins never gets close to explaining how you can use consciousness to financially invest better, giving credence to his purity of the motivation. And knowing my buddy who lives by this stuff, the life-changing capacity is genuine. But anything, drivel or brilliance, about self-introspection and human value has the capacity (shocking) to get people self-introspective and thinking about values, so PvF's specious argument and ridiculous methods here are window dressing on a manequin of high hopes.
Hawkin's cosmological argument is imprecise, incomplete and ultimately flawed, though reasonable enough at a glance--the conclusion to which is that we united mind-body selves are connected to a wholly interconnected universe. The noetic argument is a bigger stretch--the conclusion to which is that our bodies stand in a knowledge-relation to all parts of the conscious universe. The two fundamental flaws are that relation to the univese does not imply relation to all the things of the universe; and that the nature of our relation to consciousness, namely knowledge, is based on an arbitrary equivocation of 'awareness'. That there is awareness (consciousness) and that we have awareness does not imply that for creatures like us awareness is knowledge; as well, consciousness could meet us in any relation, most directly the simple relation of being aware.
But the 'practical' implications take the cake. For, even if we are connected to the universe, and to things of it, and connected in knowledge ways, Hawkins demands (with appeal to science, though no evidence) that your arm (in the right conditions) serves to ascertain knowledge, and that truth knowledge (now abandoning his non-Western concept for an intentionally simple, Western concept) can yield value measurments with the same method! That your arm is the cable to the consciousness internet is just silly (why not little toe, why not intense meditation of some sort?), and that the same test works for such various ontological commitments as propositions and high order values, is just too good to be realistic at all.
So, ignore the mathematical evaluations, ignore the dream of knowing everything with your simple arm, and ignore the noetic argument about your reation to the universe. But by all means, if it helps you to quantify and categorize values, embrace this one more guess at how to live in a world of spiritual consequences and hierarchies.
PvF is not really the self-help para-spirituality that it seems on hearing a review. For instance, Hawkins never gets close to explaining how you can use consciousness to financially invest better, giving credence to his purity of the motivation. And knowing my buddy who lives by this stuff, the life-changing capacity is genuine. But anything, drivel or brilliance, about self-introspection and human value has the capacity (shocking) to get people self-introspective and thinking about values, so PvF's specious argument and ridiculous methods here are window dressing on a manequin of high hopes.
Hawkin's cosmological argument is imprecise, incomplete and ultimately flawed, though reasonable enough at a glance--the conclusion to which is that we united mind-body selves are connected to a wholly interconnected universe. The noetic argument is a bigger stretch--the conclusion to which is that our bodies stand in a knowledge-relation to all parts of the conscious universe. The two fundamental flaws are that relation to the univese does not imply relation to all the things of the universe; and that the nature of our relation to consciousness, namely knowledge, is based on an arbitrary equivocation of 'awareness'. That there is awareness (consciousness) and that we have awareness does not imply that for creatures like us awareness is knowledge; as well, consciousness could meet us in any relation, most directly the simple relation of being aware.
But the 'practical' implications take the cake. For, even if we are connected to the universe, and to things of it, and connected in knowledge ways, Hawkins demands (with appeal to science, though no evidence) that your arm (in the right conditions) serves to ascertain knowledge, and that truth knowledge (now abandoning his non-Western concept for an intentionally simple, Western concept) can yield value measurments with the same method! That your arm is the cable to the consciousness internet is just silly (why not little toe, why not intense meditation of some sort?), and that the same test works for such various ontological commitments as propositions and high order values, is just too good to be realistic at all.
So, ignore the mathematical evaluations, ignore the dream of knowing everything with your simple arm, and ignore the noetic argument about your reation to the universe. But by all means, if it helps you to quantify and categorize values, embrace this one more guess at how to live in a world of spiritual consequences and hierarchies.
April 11, 2012
This is a unique book - I鈥檝e never read anything like it before.
The book is worth reading for the preface alone. Here Hawkins discloses his various awakening experiences, beginning at the age of three. At one point, when caught in a blizzard, he enters 鈥渁 state of peace beyond all description 鈥� accompanied by a suffusion of light and a Presence of infinite love鈥�. This was indistinguishable from his own essence. Later in life he enters a permanent state of bliss. He was 鈥渁n instrument of the Infinite Presence, and 鈥� did as it willed鈥�.
His chronic maladies disappear. He heals incurable catatonics and other desperately ill psychotics in an instant just by 鈥渓oving鈥� them. He sees in each patient 鈥渢he shining essence of love and beauty鈥� and the patient is healed by his/her own recognition of who he/she really is. He sees that 鈥渁ll pain and suffering arises solely from the ego and not from God鈥�.
This preface is a revelation. Make sure to read it.
But the main content of the book is about the author鈥檚 discovery of kinesiology 鈥� that the truth or falsehood of any statement can be tested by means of muscle testing. Our bodies in their infinite wisdom know the answer to everything.
Hawking devises a scale of calibration ranging from 0 鈥� 1000. O is presumably death, 700-1000 is enlightenment. Shame, Guilt, Apathy, Grief, Fear, Desire, Anger, Pride range from 20-175. At the 200 level, which is Courage, power first appears.
When subjects are tested at all the energy levels below 200, all go weak. Everyone goes strong at levels above 200.
Neutrality is 250, Willingness is 310, Acceptance is 350, Reason is 400, Love is 500. (The love referred to is 鈥渦nconditional, unchanging, and permanent鈥�.) Joy is 540, Peace is 600 and, as stated, Enlightenment is 700-1000.
The collective level of consciousness of mankind is currently at 207 (the book first appeared in 1995, so perhaps the average level of consciousness has now increased).
The level of Nobel Prize Winners, great statesmen, Einstein and Freud calibrates at 400. From level 540 up is 鈥渢he domain of saints --- advanced spiritual students and healers鈥�. The level of 600 is associated with 鈥渢ranscendence, self-realization, and God-consciousness鈥�. 鈥淚t is extremely rare, attained by only 1 in 10 million people.鈥� Mahatma Gandhi calibrated at 700. Gandhi won in the struggle against the British Empire because his position was one of far greater power. The British Empire represented Force (calibrated at 175) and power always wins against force.
Hawkins has calibrated each sentence and chapter in the book to check for their truth. The calibrated levels of truth of the chapters are given at the back of the book and range from 710 to 890.
I would thus strongly advise everyone to read this book - it may raise your consciousness!
The book is worth reading for the preface alone. Here Hawkins discloses his various awakening experiences, beginning at the age of three. At one point, when caught in a blizzard, he enters 鈥渁 state of peace beyond all description 鈥� accompanied by a suffusion of light and a Presence of infinite love鈥�. This was indistinguishable from his own essence. Later in life he enters a permanent state of bliss. He was 鈥渁n instrument of the Infinite Presence, and 鈥� did as it willed鈥�.
His chronic maladies disappear. He heals incurable catatonics and other desperately ill psychotics in an instant just by 鈥渓oving鈥� them. He sees in each patient 鈥渢he shining essence of love and beauty鈥� and the patient is healed by his/her own recognition of who he/she really is. He sees that 鈥渁ll pain and suffering arises solely from the ego and not from God鈥�.
This preface is a revelation. Make sure to read it.
But the main content of the book is about the author鈥檚 discovery of kinesiology 鈥� that the truth or falsehood of any statement can be tested by means of muscle testing. Our bodies in their infinite wisdom know the answer to everything.
Hawking devises a scale of calibration ranging from 0 鈥� 1000. O is presumably death, 700-1000 is enlightenment. Shame, Guilt, Apathy, Grief, Fear, Desire, Anger, Pride range from 20-175. At the 200 level, which is Courage, power first appears.
When subjects are tested at all the energy levels below 200, all go weak. Everyone goes strong at levels above 200.
Neutrality is 250, Willingness is 310, Acceptance is 350, Reason is 400, Love is 500. (The love referred to is 鈥渦nconditional, unchanging, and permanent鈥�.) Joy is 540, Peace is 600 and, as stated, Enlightenment is 700-1000.
The collective level of consciousness of mankind is currently at 207 (the book first appeared in 1995, so perhaps the average level of consciousness has now increased).
The level of Nobel Prize Winners, great statesmen, Einstein and Freud calibrates at 400. From level 540 up is 鈥渢he domain of saints --- advanced spiritual students and healers鈥�. The level of 600 is associated with 鈥渢ranscendence, self-realization, and God-consciousness鈥�. 鈥淚t is extremely rare, attained by only 1 in 10 million people.鈥� Mahatma Gandhi calibrated at 700. Gandhi won in the struggle against the British Empire because his position was one of far greater power. The British Empire represented Force (calibrated at 175) and power always wins against force.
Hawkins has calibrated each sentence and chapter in the book to check for their truth. The calibrated levels of truth of the chapters are given at the back of the book and range from 710 to 890.
I would thus strongly advise everyone to read this book - it may raise your consciousness!
March 23, 2012
Under his scientific kinesiological system (testing muscle reactions to good and bad stimuli), Hawkins rates human traits on a numeric scale. Most of us (85%) are below 200 because we focus on survival and are preoccupied with negative thoughts and feelings. Those that are in the 200-500 range are increasingly humanitarian in orientation. Descartes, Freud, Einstein were rated at 499 - how they were measured, I can't say right off). Hawkins says currenly that only "twelve persons on the planet" calibrate at 700 or above. Only the rarest individuals in history have reached the fully enlightened spot (e.g., Jesus, Buddha, Krishna) where time is timeless and dimensionless, and existence is continuous and beyond duality, and where divinity is experienced within.
In this hierarchical scale, power increases and force recedes. Power is whole, positive and wholesome. Force is partial, selfish, negative energy and unhealthy. Hawkins pulls everything into his system. His theory he believes is verified by quantum physics (non-linear causality). It explains highly successful business people, artists, sports figures. Everything we do generates an energy field and creates a personal record, and "the ripples we create return to us" (karma). Hawkins believes his system reveals the evolution of consciousness and this will lead to the salvation of humankind.
Hawkins has a story to tell and he does a good job at weaving it all together. No doubt there's much to be said about the power of positive thinking. If this helps people, that's a good thing. He references various 12 step programs as kindred to his own. For doubters, there's not much room for discussion when he asserts that the three dimensional universe is conventional, whereas the universe has "higher dimensional realities." With that perspective, whatever is said from the conventional paradigm is dismissed (or can be placed low on his scale) because there's always this higher truth. There's a beauty in faith and also a danger.
In this hierarchical scale, power increases and force recedes. Power is whole, positive and wholesome. Force is partial, selfish, negative energy and unhealthy. Hawkins pulls everything into his system. His theory he believes is verified by quantum physics (non-linear causality). It explains highly successful business people, artists, sports figures. Everything we do generates an energy field and creates a personal record, and "the ripples we create return to us" (karma). Hawkins believes his system reveals the evolution of consciousness and this will lead to the salvation of humankind.
Hawkins has a story to tell and he does a good job at weaving it all together. No doubt there's much to be said about the power of positive thinking. If this helps people, that's a good thing. He references various 12 step programs as kindred to his own. For doubters, there's not much room for discussion when he asserts that the three dimensional universe is conventional, whereas the universe has "higher dimensional realities." With that perspective, whatever is said from the conventional paradigm is dismissed (or can be placed low on his scale) because there's always this higher truth. There's a beauty in faith and also a danger.
November 6, 2016
猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍猸愶笍 賳噩賲丕鬲
賱賲 兀賯乇兀 賮賷 賲賵囟賵毓 鬲胤賵賷乇 丕賱匕丕鬲 賲賳匕 賮鬲乇丞 噩丿丕 胤賵賷賱丞 賱兀賻賳賽賾賷 賲丕 毓丿鬲 兀毓亘兀 亘丕賱賰賱丕賲 丕賱賲賰乇乇 賵 丕賱噩賲賱 丕賱乇賳丕賳丞 賵 丕賱鬲賲乇賷賳丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賳賮毓 賷兀鬲賷 賲賳賴丕 廿賲丕 賱毓丿賲 賵氐賮賴丕 亘丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱氐丨賷丨丞 丕賵 賱賱鬲賳賮賷匕 丕賱匕賷 賷賮鬲賯乇 賱賱廿卮乇丕賮 .. 賱賰賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲禺鬲賱賮 貙 兀賳丕 賱賲 兀賯乇兀 賮賷 丕賱賵毓賷 丨鬲賶 兀賲爻賰鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵 賴賵 賮賷 丕賱兀氐賱 賴丿賷丞 賲賳賷 賱卮禺氐 賰丕賳 賷亘丨孬 毓賳賴 賱賰賳 丕賱賮囟賵賱 丿賮毓 亘賷 廿賱賶 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 賯亘賱 廿毓胤丕亍賴 賱氐丕丨亘賴 ... 丕賱賲賴賲 賱賲 兀賲賱 賲賳 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱爻胤乇 鬲賱賵 丕賱丌禺乇 賵 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵 丕爻鬲賷毓丕亘 賲丕 噩丕亍 賮賷賴.
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 賰鬲亘 賮賱匕賱賰 兀馗賳 兀賳賴 賰賲賯丿賲丞 賱賲丕 亘毓丿賴 貙 賰丕賳鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 禺賮賷賮丞 賵 賱賷爻 亘賴 鬲毓賯賷丿 賰亘賷乇 賵 匕賱賰 賷乇噩毓 廿賱賶 毓乇囟賴 兀爻丕爻丕鬲 丕賱亘丨孬 丿賵賳 鬲卮毓亘 賱賰賳 亘卮乇丨 賲賵噩夭 賵 賲賰孬賮 .. 賷亘丿兀 亘卮乇丨 丕禺鬲亘丕乇 丕賳賯亘丕囟 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 賱賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賶 廿噩丕亘丞 亘賳毓賲 丕賵 賱丕 毓賱賶 兀爻卅賱丞 孬賲 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵 噩爻丿賴 亘丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 亘兀賳賵丕毓賴丕 丨鬲賶 丿賵賳 賵毓賷 賲賳賴賲 孬賲 卮乇丨 賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱賵毓賷 毓賱賶 爻賱賲 賲賳 0-1000 賵 賷賯爻賲賴丕 廿賱賶 丿乇噩丕鬲 亘丨爻亘 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵 賵氐賮賴丕 賵 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱賲乇鬲亘胤 亘賴丕 孬賲 賷卮乇丨 亘毓丿賴丕 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱乇毓賷 亘卮鬲賶 噩賵丕賳亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 .
乇睾賲 兀賳賷 賱賲 丕爻鬲賵毓亘 賰孬賷乇丕 丌賱賷丞 丕賱丕禺鬲亘丕乇 丕賱匕賷 兀禺匕 賷匕賰乇賴 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 ( 丕賳賯亘丕囟 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 賱賱賲毓乇賮丞 噩賵丕亘 爻丐丕賱 賲毓賷賳 賵 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 亘丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 ) 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 丕賱賲噩賲賱 噩賷丿 乇睾賲 兀賳賷 丕丨鬲丕噩 賱乇丐賷丞 賲丿賶 賮丕毓賱賷丞 賴匕丕 丕賱丕禺鬲亘丕乇 賮賷 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賮毓賱丕 賵 賰賷賮 賷鬲賲 賯賷丕爻 賳鬲賷噩鬲賴 賵 賳丨賵賴丕 .. 賵乇亘賲丕 匕賰乇 胤乇賷賯丞 鬲丨丿賷丿 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱賲乇鬲亘胤丞 亘丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 .
丕賳氐丨 亘丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賲賳 賷賴鬲賲 亘丕賱賵毓賷 賵 亘賲賳 賷爻賰賳賴 丕賱賮囟賵賱 賱賱廿胤賱丕毓 亘卮賰賱 毓丕賲 賱丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賷囟賷賮 賱賰 亘賰賱 鬲兀賰賷丿 .
賱賲 兀賯乇兀 賮賷 賲賵囟賵毓 鬲胤賵賷乇 丕賱匕丕鬲 賲賳匕 賮鬲乇丞 噩丿丕 胤賵賷賱丞 賱兀賻賳賽賾賷 賲丕 毓丿鬲 兀毓亘兀 亘丕賱賰賱丕賲 丕賱賲賰乇乇 賵 丕賱噩賲賱 丕賱乇賳丕賳丞 賵 丕賱鬲賲乇賷賳丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賳賮毓 賷兀鬲賷 賲賳賴丕 廿賲丕 賱毓丿賲 賵氐賮賴丕 亘丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱氐丨賷丨丞 丕賵 賱賱鬲賳賮賷匕 丕賱匕賷 賷賮鬲賯乇 賱賱廿卮乇丕賮 .. 賱賰賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲禺鬲賱賮 貙 兀賳丕 賱賲 兀賯乇兀 賮賷 丕賱賵毓賷 丨鬲賶 兀賲爻賰鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵 賴賵 賮賷 丕賱兀氐賱 賴丿賷丞 賲賳賷 賱卮禺氐 賰丕賳 賷亘丨孬 毓賳賴 賱賰賳 丕賱賮囟賵賱 丿賮毓 亘賷 廿賱賶 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 賯亘賱 廿毓胤丕亍賴 賱氐丕丨亘賴 ... 丕賱賲賴賲 賱賲 兀賲賱 賲賳 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱爻胤乇 鬲賱賵 丕賱丌禺乇 賵 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵 丕爻鬲賷毓丕亘 賲丕 噩丕亍 賮賷賴.
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 賰鬲亘 賮賱匕賱賰 兀馗賳 兀賳賴 賰賲賯丿賲丞 賱賲丕 亘毓丿賴 貙 賰丕賳鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 禺賮賷賮丞 賵 賱賷爻 亘賴 鬲毓賯賷丿 賰亘賷乇 賵 匕賱賰 賷乇噩毓 廿賱賶 毓乇囟賴 兀爻丕爻丕鬲 丕賱亘丨孬 丿賵賳 鬲卮毓亘 賱賰賳 亘卮乇丨 賲賵噩夭 賵 賲賰孬賮 .. 賷亘丿兀 亘卮乇丨 丕禺鬲亘丕乇 丕賳賯亘丕囟 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 賱賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賶 廿噩丕亘丞 亘賳毓賲 丕賵 賱丕 毓賱賶 兀爻卅賱丞 孬賲 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵 噩爻丿賴 亘丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 亘兀賳賵丕毓賴丕 丨鬲賶 丿賵賳 賵毓賷 賲賳賴賲 孬賲 卮乇丨 賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱賵毓賷 毓賱賶 爻賱賲 賲賳 0-1000 賵 賷賯爻賲賴丕 廿賱賶 丿乇噩丕鬲 亘丨爻亘 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵 賵氐賮賴丕 賵 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱賲乇鬲亘胤 亘賴丕 孬賲 賷卮乇丨 亘毓丿賴丕 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱乇毓賷 亘卮鬲賶 噩賵丕賳亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 .
乇睾賲 兀賳賷 賱賲 丕爻鬲賵毓亘 賰孬賷乇丕 丌賱賷丞 丕賱丕禺鬲亘丕乇 丕賱匕賷 兀禺匕 賷匕賰乇賴 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 ( 丕賳賯亘丕囟 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 賱賱賲毓乇賮丞 噩賵丕亘 爻丐丕賱 賲毓賷賳 賵 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱毓囟賱丕鬲 亘丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 ) 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 丕賱賲噩賲賱 噩賷丿 乇睾賲 兀賳賷 丕丨鬲丕噩 賱乇丐賷丞 賲丿賶 賮丕毓賱賷丞 賴匕丕 丕賱丕禺鬲亘丕乇 賮賷 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賮毓賱丕 賵 賰賷賮 賷鬲賲 賯賷丕爻 賳鬲賷噩鬲賴 賵 賳丨賵賴丕 .. 賵乇亘賲丕 匕賰乇 胤乇賷賯丞 鬲丨丿賷丿 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱賲乇鬲亘胤丞 亘丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 .
丕賳氐丨 亘丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賲賳 賷賴鬲賲 亘丕賱賵毓賷 賵 亘賲賳 賷爻賰賳賴 丕賱賮囟賵賱 賱賱廿胤賱丕毓 亘卮賰賱 毓丕賲 賱丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賷囟賷賮 賱賰 亘賰賱 鬲兀賰賷丿 .
October 11, 2021
K岷縯 qu岷� nghi锚n c峄﹗ 膽瓢峄 么ng tr矛nh b脿y trong cu峄憂 s谩ch b谩n ch岷 nh岷 c峄 m矛nh- 鈥淧ower vs Force 鈥� Tr瓢峄漬g n膬ng l瓢峄g v脿 nh峄痭g nh芒n t峄� quy岷縯 膽峄媙h tinh th岷, s峄ヽ kh峄廵 con ng瓢峄漣鈥�.
Theo 膽贸, m峄梚 ng瓢峄漣 c贸 m峄檛 t岷 s峄� rung 膽峄檔g hay m峄ヽ n膬ng l瓢峄g kh谩c nhau t霉y theo c岷h gi峄沬 tinh th岷 c峄 h峄�, n岷眒 trong kho岷g t峄� 1 膽岷縩 1000. V铆 d峄� nh瓢:
Vui v岷�, thanh t末nh: 540
L媒 t铆nh, th岷 hi峄僽: 400
Khoan dung 膽峄� l瓢峄g: 350
Hy v峄峮g l岷 quan: 310
T峄� cao, khinh th瓢峄漬g: 175
C膬m gh茅t, th霉 h岷璶: 150
D峄 v峄峮g, khao kh谩t: 125
S峄� h茫i, lo l岷痭g: 100
膼au bu峄搉, ti岷縞 nu峄慽: 75
Th峄� 啤, tuy峄噒 v峄峮g: 50
Nh峄 nh茫, h峄� th岷筺: 20
Cu峄憂 s谩ch n脿y 膽茫 膽em 膽岷縩 m峄檛 b瓢峄沜 膽峄檛 ph谩 l峄沶 lao cho tinh th岷 con ng瓢峄漣, ph谩c ra nh峄痭g chi峄乽 k铆ch 媒 th峄ヽ m脿 tr瓢峄沜 膽芒y ch峄� nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 c贸 kh岷� n膬ng th岷 b铆 m峄沬 bi岷縯 t峄沬. Nh峄痭g con ng瓢峄漣 c贸 thi锚n khi岷縰 tr峄眂 nh岷璶 Th峄眂 t岷 (hay c谩ch g峄峣 g矛 ch膬ng n峄痑) nh瓢 th岷�, lu么n lu么n kh岷硁g 膽峄媙h vai tr貌 trung t芒m c峄 c谩i 鈥渧么 h矛nh鈥�.
Theo 膽贸, m峄梚 ng瓢峄漣 c贸 m峄檛 t岷 s峄� rung 膽峄檔g hay m峄ヽ n膬ng l瓢峄g kh谩c nhau t霉y theo c岷h gi峄沬 tinh th岷 c峄 h峄�, n岷眒 trong kho岷g t峄� 1 膽岷縩 1000. V铆 d峄� nh瓢:
Vui v岷�, thanh t末nh: 540
L媒 t铆nh, th岷 hi峄僽: 400
Khoan dung 膽峄� l瓢峄g: 350
Hy v峄峮g l岷 quan: 310
T峄� cao, khinh th瓢峄漬g: 175
C膬m gh茅t, th霉 h岷璶: 150
D峄 v峄峮g, khao kh谩t: 125
S峄� h茫i, lo l岷痭g: 100
膼au bu峄搉, ti岷縞 nu峄慽: 75
Th峄� 啤, tuy峄噒 v峄峮g: 50
Nh峄 nh茫, h峄� th岷筺: 20
Cu峄憂 s谩ch n脿y 膽茫 膽em 膽岷縩 m峄檛 b瓢峄沜 膽峄檛 ph谩 l峄沶 lao cho tinh th岷 con ng瓢峄漣, ph谩c ra nh峄痭g chi峄乽 k铆ch 媒 th峄ヽ m脿 tr瓢峄沜 膽芒y ch峄� nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 c贸 kh岷� n膬ng th岷 b铆 m峄沬 bi岷縯 t峄沬. Nh峄痭g con ng瓢峄漣 c贸 thi锚n khi岷縰 tr峄眂 nh岷璶 Th峄眂 t岷 (hay c谩ch g峄峣 g矛 ch膬ng n峄痑) nh瓢 th岷�, lu么n lu么n kh岷硁g 膽峄媙h vai tr貌 trung t芒m c峄 c谩i 鈥渧么 h矛nh鈥�.
August 27, 2021
賯乇兀鬲賴 丕賰孬乇 賲賳 賲乇丞 .. 賵爻丐丕賱 賲丕 賷鬲乇丿丿 賰孬賷乇丕 賲賳 兀賷賳 丕亘丿兀 賮賷 爻賱爻賱丞 賰鬲亘 丿賷賮賷丿 賴賵賰賳夭 .. 丕亘丿兀 賲賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱兀賳賴 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 賱賮賴賲 丕賱爻賲丕丨 亘丕賱乇丨賷賱 賵鬲噩丕賵夭 賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲
丕賱賵毓賷 .. 賷亘丿兀 賮賷賴 賴賵賰賳夭 亘鬲賵囟賷丨 胤乇賷賯鬲賴 亘丿乇丕爻丞 賵賵囟毓 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷. 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賷 丕丨亘 丕賳 賱丿賷賮賷丿 賵丨鬲賶 丕賳賷 丕毓賷丿 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱賰鬲亘 賱賲丕 鬲囟賷賮賴 賲賳 賯賷賲丞 .. 丕賱乇鬲噩賲丞 爻賱爻丞
.賵噩賷丿丞 賱賰賳 丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲鬲賯賳 丕賱丕賳噩賱賷夭賷丞 賮賷賮囟賱 丕賳 鬲賯乇兀 丕賱賳爻禺丞 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘
丕賱賵毓賷 .. 賷亘丿兀 賮賷賴 賴賵賰賳夭 亘鬲賵囟賷丨 胤乇賷賯鬲賴 亘丿乇丕爻丞 賵賵囟毓 爻賱賲 丕賱賵毓賷. 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賷 丕丨亘 丕賳 賱丿賷賮賷丿 賵丨鬲賶 丕賳賷 丕毓賷丿 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱賰鬲亘 賱賲丕 鬲囟賷賮賴 賲賳 賯賷賲丞 .. 丕賱乇鬲噩賲丞 爻賱爻丞
.賵噩賷丿丞 賱賰賳 丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲鬲賯賳 丕賱丕賳噩賱賷夭賷丞 賮賷賮囟賱 丕賳 鬲賯乇兀 丕賱賳爻禺丞 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘
April 4, 2020
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丿賴 賲丨鬲丕噩 賷鬲亘爻胤
賲鬲禺氐氐 賷丕禺丿賴 賵 賷賴匕亘賴 賵 賷賵氐賱賳丕 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 亘胤乇賷賯丞 丕爻賴賱 賵 丕亘爻胤貙 乇亘賲丕 賮賷 賮毓賱丕 丨丿 丕鬲賰賱賲 賮賳賮爻 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓 賵丕賳丕 賲毓乇賮卮
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賴賲 賵 賲賲賷夭 賱賰賳 賰賲賷丞 丕賱氐毓賵亘丕鬲 丕賱賱賷 丕禺丿鬲賴丕 毓卮丕賳 丕賮賴賲 賲賳賴 噩夭亍 亘爻賷胤 賰丕賳鬲 賰亘賷乇丞 賵賱賱丕爻賮 賲賯丿乇鬲卮 丕賱賲 亘賴 賰賱賴
賲禺鬲賱賮 賲毓賴 賮賷 賳賯丕胤 鬲禺氐 丕賱丕丿賷丕賳貨 丕賳丕 賲鬲毓氐亘 賱丿賷賳賷
丕賱賰賳爻賷賵賱賵噩賷丕 毓賱賲 丨乇賰丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賴賵 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 賱賱丨乇賰丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞貙 毓賱賲 廿爻鬲噩丕亘丞 丕賱丕毓囟丕亍 賱賱賲丨賮夭丕鬲
卮乇丨 賱賳馗乇賷丞 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵 賲爻鬲賵丕賷鬲賴 亘賷賳 丕賱賯賵丞 賵 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴貙 丕賱夭賷賮 賵 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞貙 丕賱氐丨賷丨 賵 丕賱禺胤兀 賵 丕賱丨丿 丕賱賮丕氐賱 亘賷賳賴賲丕 賵 賴賵 佗贍贍
丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱賵毓賷:
丿乇噩賴 丕賱賵毓賷 佗贍 (丕賱毓丕乇)
賯丿 噩乇亘賳丕 賰賱賳丕 卮毓賵乇 賮賯丿丕賳 賲丕亍 丕賱賵噩賴貙 賵卮毓賵乇賳丕 亘丕賱禺夭賷貙 賵亘賰賵賳賳丕 賳賰乇丞 賱賱丨馗丞貙 賱賰賳 賲丕 丕賳 賷睾乇賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賱賳 賷噩丿 爻亘賷賱丕 丕賱丕 亘賯鬲賱 賳賮爻賴 丕丨賷丕賳丕貙 毓賱賴 賷夭賷賱 賰賱 卮賷亍 賮賷胤丕賵賱 丕賱爻賰賷賳賴貙 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賲賳亘賵匕丕 賷毓賳賷 兀賳 鬲卮毓乇 亘丕賱毓丕乇貙 賵賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓丕鬲 丕賱亘丿丕卅賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕賳丨丿乇賳丕 賲賳賴丕 噩賲賷毓丕貙 賮丕賳 丕賱丕亘毓丕丿 賵 丕賱賳亘匕 賲乇丕丿賮 賱賱賲賵鬲.
丕賱丿乇噩丞 伲贍 (丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱匕賳亘)
丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱匕賳亘 賷爻亘亘 丕賮丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 賵噩爻丿賷丞 賵賲賷賵賱丕 丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞貙 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賷氐丕乇毓賵賳 胤賵丕賱 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 賴匕丕 丕賱卮毓賵乇貙 賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱賴乇亘 賷丕卅爻丕 亘賳賰乇丕賳賴 鬲賲丕賲丕
丕賱丿乇噩丞 佶贍 (丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞)
丕賱賮賯乇 賵丕賱賷兀爻 賵丕賱賯賳賵鬲 賴賲 爻賲丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷貙 賯丿 賷賲賵鬲賵賳 賵丨賷丿賷賳 丕賳 賱賲 賷噩丿賵丕 賲賳 賷毓鬲賳賷 亘賴賲貙 賱丕 賷鬲丕孬乇賵賳 賱丕賷 賲丨賮夭貙 賵賱丕 賷爻鬲噩賷亘賵賳 毓賱賷 丕賷丞 亘丕乇賯丞 丕賲賱
丕賱丿乇噩丞 侑佶 (丕賱兀爻賶)
賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱丨夭賳 賵丕賱禺爻乇丕賳 賵丕賱噩夭毓貙 丕賳賴丕 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱鬲賷 丕禺鬲亘乇鬲賴丕 丕睾賱亘 丕賱噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳 賲賳 賷亘賯賷 亘賴丕 賷丨賷丕 丨賷丕丞 賲賱丐賴丕 丕賱賳丿賲 賵丕賱丨乇賲丕賳貙 賮賷賴丕 丨丿丕丿 丿丕卅賲貙 賮賯丿丕賳 賵丨爻乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱賲丕囟賷貙 賴賷 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賮丕卮賱賷賳 賵丕賱匕賷賳 丕毓鬲丕丿賵丕 丕賱丕賳賴夭丕賲 賰兀爻賱賵亘 丨賷丕丞貙 賮賯丿賵丕 丨鬲賷 毓賲賱賴賲 賵丕氐丿賯丕卅賴賲 賵毓丕卅賱丕鬲賴賲 賵賮乇氐賴賲 賵氐丨鬲賴賲貙 丕賱禺爻丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丿孬 賱賴賲 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丕鬲 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 鬲噩毓賱賴賲 賷毓鬲丕丿賵賳 毓賱賷 丕賱兀爻賶貙 賮賴賳丕 賷乇賷 丕賱賲乇亍 丕賱丨夭賳 賮賷 賰賱 夭丕賵賷丞 賵鬲賮氐賷賱 賲賳 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丕賱賵噩賵丿
丕賳 丕丨丿 爻賲丕鬲 賴匕賴 丕賱丨丕賱丞 賴賷 丕賳 賲丕 鬲禺爻乇賴 賱賳 鬲毓賵囟賴 賵爻鬲亘賯賷 毓賱賷 丨丕賱賰 賱賷夭賷丿 兀爻丕賰貙 亘賱 丕匕丕 賲丕 禺爻乇鬲 卮禺氐丕 鬲丨亘賴貙 賮丕賳賰 爻鬲毓鬲亘乇 賵賰丕賳賰 禺爻乇鬲 丕賱丨亘 亘兀賰賲賱賴貙 賵賮賷 賲孬賱 賴匕賴 丕賱氐丿賲丕鬲 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷丞 賯丿 賷氐賱 丕賱丕賲乇 丕賱賷 丕丨亘丕胤 賲夭賲賳 賷賳鬲賴賷 亘丕賱賲賵鬲貙 賵毓賱賷 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 賰賵賳 丕賱兀爻賶 賲賯亘乇丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞貙 丕賱丕 丕賳賴 賷亘賯賷 丕賮囟賱 丨丕賱丕 賲賳 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞貙 賵毓賳丿賲丕 賷亘丿丕 卮禺氐 賲氐丿賵賲 賲氐丕亘 亘丕賱丕爻賶 亘丕賱亘賰丕亍 爻賳毓乇賮 丨賷賳賴丕 丕賳賴 亘丿丕 亘丕賱鬲丨爻賳貙
丕賱丿乇噩丞 佟贍贍 (丕賱禺賵賮)
丕賱禺賵賮 賴賵 賲丕 賷丿賷乇 噩夭亍丕 賰亘賷乇丕 賲賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賮賴賵 賷卮賰賱 丿丕賮毓丕 賱丕賮毓丕賱 賱丕 毓丿 賱賴丕貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱丕毓丿丕亍貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱卮賷禺賵禺丞貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 禺爻丕乇丞 賲丨亘賵亘賰貙 丕賱丕賳馗賲丞 丕賱丿賷賰鬲丕鬲賵乇賷丞 鬲賱毓亘 毓賱賷 賵鬲賷乇丞 丕賱禺賵賮貙 丕賱丕毓賱丕賲 賷賱毓亘 毓賱賷 賵鬲賷乇丞 丕賱禺賵賮貙 丨丕賱賲丕 賷賱鬲賴賲賰 丕賱禺賵賮 爻鬲乇丕賴 賮賷 賰賱 卮賷亍 丨賵賱賰
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟佗佶 (丕賱乇睾亘丞)
丕賱乇睾亘丞 賴賷 賲賳 鬲賯賵丿賳丕 亘亘匕賱 毓馗賷賲 丕賱噩賴丿 亘睾賷丞 鬲丨賯賷賯 丕賴丿丕賮賳丕貙 賵賳賷賱 賲丕 賳爻鬲丨賯貙 賮丕賱乇睾亘丞 亘丕賱賲丕賱 賵丕賱賲賰丕賳丞 賵丕賱爻賱胤丞 賴賷 賲賳 鬲丿賷乇 丨賷丕丞 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲噩丕賵夭賵丕 丿丕賮毓 丕賱禺賵賮 丕賱匕賷 賷賯賷丿 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賯丿 鬲氐亘丨 賳賵毓丕 賲賳 丕賱丕丿賲丕賳 賯丿 賱丕 賷丿乇賰 氐丕丨亘賴丕 匕賱賰貙 賵 鬲氐亘丨 丕賱乇睾亘丞 卮睾賮丕 丕賰孬乇 丕賴賲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賳賮爻賴丕.
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟佶贍 (丕賱睾囟亘)
毓賱賷 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 賰賵賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷賯賵丿 賱賱賯鬲賱 賵丕賱丨乇賵亘貙 丕賱丕 丕賳賴 賷亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 鬲毓賲丿 賯鬲賱 丕賱匕丕鬲 賰兀睾賱亘 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 爻亘賯鬲賴貙 賱賱睾囟亘 賵噩賴丕賳 丕丨丿賴賲丕 賲丿賲乇 賵丕賱丕禺乇 賲毓賲乇貙 賮丕賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷毓鬲亘乇 賳賯胤丞 丕乇鬲賰丕夭 鬲賲賰賳 丕賱賲囟胤賴丿賷賳 賲賳 丕賱丕賳胤賱丕賯 賱賱丨乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷毓亘乇 毓賳 賳賮爻賴 亘丕賱丕爻鬲賷丕亍 賵丕賱丕賳鬲賯丕賲 賱匕賱賰 賮賴賵 禺胤賷乇 賵夭丕卅賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟侑佶 (丕賱賮禺乇)
丕賱賮禺乇 賷賮乇賯 亘丿賱 丕賳 賷噩賲毓貙 賰賲丕 丕賳賴 賷賳囟賵賷 毓賱賷 賳鬲丕卅噩 賵禺賷賲丞貙 賵賮賷 爻亘賷賱賴 賷賲賵鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇賵賳貙 賵鬲匕亘丨 丕賱噩賷賵卮 亘毓囟賴丕 鬲丨鬲 卮毓丕乇 丕賱鬲賮丕禺乇 亘丕賱賵胤賳 丕賵 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賵 丕賱丨夭亘 丕賵 丕賱丿賷賳貙 賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱賮禺乇 丕賱乇卅賷爻賷丞 丕賱噩賴賱 賵丕賱廿賳賰丕乇貙 賮丕賱卮賮丕亍 賲賳 丕賱丕丿賲丕賳 賲孬賱丕 賲爻鬲丨賷賱 賮賷 丨丕賱 丕賳賰乇 丕賱賲乇亍 賱亘 賲卮賰賱鬲賴
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佗贍贍 (丕賱卮噩丕毓丞)
丕賳賴丕 丕賱丿乇噩賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮氐賱 丕賱夭賷賮 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞貙 丕賱丕賷噩丕亘賷 毓賳 丕賱爻賱亘賷貙 丕賱丕賰乇丕賴 毓賳 丕賱賯賵丞貙 賴賳丕 鬲亘丿丕 亘丕丿乇丕賰賴丕 賵賴賳丕 賷亘丿丕 毓賯賱賰 亘丕賱鬲賮鬲丨 賵丕賱丕爻鬲賰卮丕賮貙 賰賱 賲丕賴賵 丕丿賳賷 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賷爻鬲亘氐乇 丕賱毓丕賱賲 毓賱賷 丕賳賴 賷丕爻 賵亘丕卅爻 賵丨夭賷賳 賵賲乇毓亘貙 賱賰賳 賴賳丕 爻鬲乇丕賴 鬲丨丿賷丕 賵賲丨賮夭丕 賵賲孬賷乇丕貙 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 鬲毓賳賷 丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱禺賵囟 賮賷 睾賲丕乇 噩丿賷丿丞 賵丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 鬲賯賱亘丕鬲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賮賷 鬲毓賱賲 賲賴丕乇丕鬲 噩丿賷丿丞 賮賷 鬲賲賳賷丞 賲毓丕乇賮賰貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 爻鬲賲賳丨 胤丕賯丞 賱賱毓丕賱賲 亘賯丿乇 賲丕 鬲爻鬲賴賱賰貙 毓賱賷 毓賰爻 噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱丿賳賷丕 賮丕賳賴賲 賷爻鬲賴賱賰賵賳 胤丕賯丕鬲 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賰賰賱 亘賱丕 賲賯丕亘賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佗佶贍 (丕賱丨賷丕丿)
賴賳丕 鬲乇鬲賯賷 賮賵賯 丕賱丕囟丿丕丿貙 鬲亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 廿胤賱丕賯 丕賱兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱賲鬲毓爻賮丞貙 賵鬲氐亘丨 丕賰孬乇 賲乇賵賳丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵丕賱毓賷卮貙 賮丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 丨賷丕丿賷丕 賷鬲賳賷 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 睾賷乇 賲乇鬲亘胤 賳爻亘賷丕 亘丕賱賳鬲丕卅噩貙 賱丕 鬲賴鬲賲 賰孬賷乇丕 賱賱禺賵賮 丕賵 丕賱賮卮賱 丕賵 丕賱鬲賵鬲乇貙 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷賯賵賱 丕賱賲乇亍 賲孬賱丕 (丨爻賳丕 丕賳 賱賲 丕爻鬲胤毓 丕賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賵馗賷賮丞 賮爻兀丨氐賱 毓賱賷 睾賷乇賴丕)貙 丕賳賴丕 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱孬賯丞 亘丕賱賳賮爻貙 丨賷孬 賷爻鬲卮毓乇 丕賱賲乇亍 賯賵鬲賴貙 賵賱毓匕丕 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 鬲賴丿賷丿賴 亘爻賴賵賱丞貙 賮毓賱丕賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賴賷 丕賱孬賯丞 亘丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱毓賷卮 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賵亘賴匕丕 賮丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷鬲囟丨 亘丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱兀賲丕賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伲佟贍 (丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿)
丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賷毓賳賷 丕賳 丕賱賲乇亍 賯丿 鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賷 丕賱賲賯丕賵賲丞 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞貙 賵丕賳賴 賲賱鬲夭賲 亘丕賱賲卮丕乇賰丞貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 賷賲賷賱 丕賱賳丕爻 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱丕丿賳賷 賲賳 佗贍贍 丕賱賷 丕賳 賷賰賵賳賵丕 賲鬲夭賲鬲賷賳 賮丕賳 賮丕鬲丨丞 毓馗賷賲丞 鬲丨丿孬 賱賴賲 賮賷 賲爻鬲賵賷 伲佟贍
賱丿賷賴賲 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕爻鬲毓丕丿丞 鬲賵丕夭賳賴賲 亘毓丿 丕賱卮丿丕卅丿 賵丕賲賰丕賳賷鬲賴賲 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賲賳 丕賱鬲噩丕乇亘貙 賮丕賳賴賲 賷賲賷賱賵賳 丕賱賷 丕賳 賷賳賲賵丕 賯丿乇丕鬲賴賲 毓賱賷 鬲氐丨賷丨 丕禺胤丕卅賴賲 匕丕鬲賷丕貙 賵賱兀賳賴賲 爻賲丨賵丕 亘乇丨賷賱 丕賱賮禺乇 賵丕賱賰亘乇 賮丕賳賴賲 賷氐亘丨賵丕 毓賱賷 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱賳馗乇 賮賷 毓賷賵亘賴賲 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賵丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賲賳賴丕 賵賲賳 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伲佶贍 (丕賱賯亘賵賱)
賱賷爻 丕賱賯亘賵賱 卮賰賱丕 賲賳 兀卮賰丕賱 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞貙 亘賱 賴賵 丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丿賵賳 丕禺囟丕毓賴丕 賱丕噩賳丿丞 賲丕貙 丕賱卮禺氐 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賱丕 賷賴鬲賲 亘鬲丨丿賷丿 丕賱氐丨賷丨 賲賳 丕賱禺胤兀貙 亘賱 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賷噩丕丿 丨賱賵賱 賱賱賲卮丕賰賱 丕賱賵丕賯毓丞 亘丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱兀賲孬賱貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 賱丕 賷氐亘丨 賴賳丕賰 卮賷亍 賷爻賲賷 (丕賱禺丕乇噩) 賵賱丿賷賴 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 噩毓賱 丕賱賲乇亍 爻毓賷丿丕貙 賮丕賳賴 賷丿乇賰 丕賳 賲氐丿乇 丕賱爻毓丕丿賴 鬲賳亘毓 賲賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱貙 賵丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻 丕賲乇丕 賷毓胤賷賴 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 丕賵 賷爻賱亘賵賴 亘賱 賷禺賱賯 賲賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伽贍贍 (丕賱毓賯賱)
丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱丨丕氐賱賷賳 毓賱賶 噩賵丕卅夭 賳賵亘賱 賵丕賱賯丕丿丞 丕賱賰亘丕乇 賵賯囟丕丞 丕賱賲丨丕賰賲 丕賱毓賱賷丕貙 毓賷賵亘賴 賴賷 丕賱賮卮賱 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮乇賷賯 亘賷賳 丕賱乇賲賵夭 賵賲丕 鬲乇賲夭 丕賱賷賴 丨賯丕貙 賵丕賱禺賱胤 丕賱丨丕氐賱 亘賷賳 毓賵丕賱賲 卮禺氐賷賴 賵賲賵囟賵毓賷丞 鬲丨丿 賲賳 賮賴賲 丕賱爻亘亘賷賴貙 丕賳 鬲乇賷 丕賱卮噩乇丞 賵 賷鬲賲 鬲噩丕賴賱 丕賱睾丕亘丞貙 賵賴賰匕丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賳 鬲氐亘丨 丕賱毓賯賱賳賴 賴賷 丕賱睾丕賷丞貙 賮丕賱毓賯賱 賲丨丿賵丿 賷毓噩夭 丕賳 賷賲賷夭 丕賱噩賵賴乇 賵 賷乇賷 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賱丕卮賷丕亍
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佶贍贍 (丕賱丨亘)
丕賱丨亘 賴賳丕 賱賷爻 賴賵 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷 鬲噩丕賴 丕賱丕禺乇賷賳 賵丕賱匕賷 賯丿 賷夭賷丿 丕賵 賷賳賯氐 賵賮賯丕 賱鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱賲丨賷胤貙 丕賳賲丕 賴賵 丕賱丨亘 睾賷乇 丕賱賲卮乇賵胤 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲亘丿賱 賵丕賱乇丕爻禺貙 賵賴賵 賱賷爻 毓乇囟丞 賱賱鬲匕亘匕亘 賱丕賳 賲氐丿乇賴 賴賵 丿丕禺賱 丕賱卮禺氐貙 丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丨丕賱丞 賰賷賳賵賳丞 亘賴丕 賳爻賲賵 賵 賳乇鬲賯賷 賵 賳賲爻賷 睾賮賵乇賷賳貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩賴 賳鬲賲賰賳 賲賳 乇丐賷丞 丕賱噩賵賴乇 賵 賮賴賲賴 毓賱賷 毓賰爻 丕賱毓賯賱貙 賷乇賰夭 丕賱丨亘 毓賱賷 賲丕 賴賵 禺賷乇 賵賷賳賲賷 賲丕 賴賵 丕賷噩丕亘賷 賵賷毓丕賱噩 丕賱爻賱亘賷丞 亘丿賱 賲賴丕噩賲鬲賴丕 丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佶伽贍 (丕賱賮乇丨)
賰賱賲丕 丕氐亘丨 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賲卮乇賵胤丕 賰賱賲丕 賯丕爻 丕賱賲乇亍 賮乇丨丕 丿丕禺賱賷丕貙 賵賴匕丕 賱賷爻 賮乇丨丕 賲賮丕噩卅 賲丐賯鬲 賳丕亘毓 毓賳 毓賵丕賲賱 禺丕乇噩賷賴貙 亘賱 卮毓賵乇 丿丕卅賲 賷乇丕賮賯 賰賱 丕賮毓丕賱賰貙 賮賷 丕毓丕賱賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 爻鬲乇賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賲賳丕乇丕 亘丕賱噩賲丕賱 丕賱亘賴賷 賵丕賱賰賲丕賱 賮賷 賰賱 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲貙 爻鬲卮毓乇 丕賳 賰賱 丕賱丕賲賵乇 鬲丨丿孬 丿賵賳 噩賴丿 賵亘丕賱鬲夭丕賲賳 亘毓囟賴丕 亘亘毓囟貙 爻鬲乇賷 賰賱 卮賷亍 賴賵 鬲噩賱 賱賱賲丨亘賴 賵丕賱廿賱賴貙 賯丿 賷乇丕賰 丕賱賳丕爻 賰賲毓噩夭丞 亘賷賳賴賲 賵 賰兀賳 胤丕賯鬲賰 賴賷 胤丕賯丞 丕賱賰賵賳 亘丕賰賲賱賴貙 爻鬲賲鬲賱賰 乇睾亘丞 賮賷 賳賮毓 丕賱丨賷丕丞 亘丕賰賲賱賴丕 丿賵賳 丕卮禺丕氐 賲毓賷賳賷賳貙 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 賲丨亘丞 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賮賷 丕賳 賵丕丨丿 鬲毓賵丿 賱賲毓乇賮丞 丕賳賴 賰賱賲丕 丕丨亘亘鬲 丕賰孬乇 賰賳鬲 賯丕丿乇丕 毓賱賷 丕賱丨亘 丕賰孬乇
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佴贍贍 (丕賱爻賱丕賲)
賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賷賲賰賳 賵氐賮賴丕 亘丕賱鬲賮賵賯貙 毓賳丿賲丕 賳氐賱 丕賱賷賴丕 賷鬲賱丕卮賷 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 亘賷賳 賲丕賴賵 卮禺氐賷 賵賲丕 賴賵 賲賵囟賵毓賷貙 賵賮賷賴丕 賷亘鬲毓丿 丕賱賲乇亍 亘卮禺氐賴 毓賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱丕毓鬲賷丕丿賷貙 賮賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷賰乇爻賴 賱賷氐亘丨 賲毓賱賲丕 乇賵丨丕賳賷丕貙 賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賲賱 亘丕賱馗賱 賱賲賳賮毓丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 噩賲毓丕亍貙 賵賴丐賱丕亍 賲賳 賷胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴賲 賱賯亘 丕賱賯丿賷爻賷賳 毓賱賷 賲乇 丕賱夭賲賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 侑贍贍-佟贍贍贍 (丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕乇丞)
丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 兀賰孬乇 丕賱賳丕爻 乇賮毓丞貙 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲賵丨丿賵丕 賲毓 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 丕賱乇賵丨丕賳賷丞 丕賱丕爻賲賷 賵鬲亘毓賴賲 丕賱亘卮乇 毓賱賷 賲乇 丕賱夭賲賳貙 丕賳賴 毓賱賷 匕乇賵丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱亘卮乇賷 丕賱賯氐賵賷貙 鬲毓丕賱賷賲賴賲 鬲乇鬲賮毓 亘賵毓賷 丕賱噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓丕賲丞貙 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷毓賳賷 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賮賷 丕賱賳毓賷賲 賮賷 丕賱爻賱丕賲 丕賱賲胤賱賯貙 賮賷賴丕 賷鬲噩丕賵夭 賵噩賵丿 丕賱賲乇亍 丕賱夭賲丕賳 賵丕賱賲賰丕賳 賵賱丕 賷毓乇賮 亘 (丕賳丕)貙 丕賳 丕毓馗賲 賲賳 賵氐賱 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴 賱賯亘 丕賱爻賷丿 亘兀噩賱 賲毓丕賳賷賴 丕賱爻賷丿 毓賷爻賷 亘賳 賲乇賷賲 賵 爻賷丿 丕賱禺賱賯 賲丨賲丿 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲
賲鬲禺氐氐 賷丕禺丿賴 賵 賷賴匕亘賴 賵 賷賵氐賱賳丕 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 亘胤乇賷賯丞 丕爻賴賱 賵 丕亘爻胤貙 乇亘賲丕 賮賷 賮毓賱丕 丨丿 丕鬲賰賱賲 賮賳賮爻 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓 賵丕賳丕 賲毓乇賮卮
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賴賲 賵 賲賲賷夭 賱賰賳 賰賲賷丞 丕賱氐毓賵亘丕鬲 丕賱賱賷 丕禺丿鬲賴丕 毓卮丕賳 丕賮賴賲 賲賳賴 噩夭亍 亘爻賷胤 賰丕賳鬲 賰亘賷乇丞 賵賱賱丕爻賮 賲賯丿乇鬲卮 丕賱賲 亘賴 賰賱賴
賲禺鬲賱賮 賲毓賴 賮賷 賳賯丕胤 鬲禺氐 丕賱丕丿賷丕賳貨 丕賳丕 賲鬲毓氐亘 賱丿賷賳賷
丕賱賰賳爻賷賵賱賵噩賷丕 毓賱賲 丨乇賰丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賴賵 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 賱賱丨乇賰丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞貙 毓賱賲 廿爻鬲噩丕亘丞 丕賱丕毓囟丕亍 賱賱賲丨賮夭丕鬲
卮乇丨 賱賳馗乇賷丞 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵 賲爻鬲賵丕賷鬲賴 亘賷賳 丕賱賯賵丞 賵 丕賱廿賰乇丕賴貙 丕賱夭賷賮 賵 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞貙 丕賱氐丨賷丨 賵 丕賱禺胤兀 賵 丕賱丨丿 丕賱賮丕氐賱 亘賷賳賴賲丕 賵 賴賵 佗贍贍
丿乇噩丕鬲 丕賱賵毓賷:
丿乇噩賴 丕賱賵毓賷 佗贍 (丕賱毓丕乇)
賯丿 噩乇亘賳丕 賰賱賳丕 卮毓賵乇 賮賯丿丕賳 賲丕亍 丕賱賵噩賴貙 賵卮毓賵乇賳丕 亘丕賱禺夭賷貙 賵亘賰賵賳賳丕 賳賰乇丞 賱賱丨馗丞貙 賱賰賳 賲丕 丕賳 賷睾乇賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賱賳 賷噩丿 爻亘賷賱丕 丕賱丕 亘賯鬲賱 賳賮爻賴 丕丨賷丕賳丕貙 毓賱賴 賷夭賷賱 賰賱 卮賷亍 賮賷胤丕賵賱 丕賱爻賰賷賳賴貙 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賲賳亘賵匕丕 賷毓賳賷 兀賳 鬲卮毓乇 亘丕賱毓丕乇貙 賵賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓丕鬲 丕賱亘丿丕卅賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕賳丨丿乇賳丕 賲賳賴丕 噩賲賷毓丕貙 賮丕賳 丕賱丕亘毓丕丿 賵 丕賱賳亘匕 賲乇丕丿賮 賱賱賲賵鬲.
丕賱丿乇噩丞 伲贍 (丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱匕賳亘)
丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱匕賳亘 賷爻亘亘 丕賮丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 賵噩爻丿賷丞 賵賲賷賵賱丕 丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞貙 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賷氐丕乇毓賵賳 胤賵丕賱 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 賴匕丕 丕賱卮毓賵乇貙 賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱賴乇亘 賷丕卅爻丕 亘賳賰乇丕賳賴 鬲賲丕賲丕
丕賱丿乇噩丞 佶贍 (丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞)
丕賱賮賯乇 賵丕賱賷兀爻 賵丕賱賯賳賵鬲 賴賲 爻賲丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷貙 賯丿 賷賲賵鬲賵賳 賵丨賷丿賷賳 丕賳 賱賲 賷噩丿賵丕 賲賳 賷毓鬲賳賷 亘賴賲貙 賱丕 賷鬲丕孬乇賵賳 賱丕賷 賲丨賮夭貙 賵賱丕 賷爻鬲噩賷亘賵賳 毓賱賷 丕賷丞 亘丕乇賯丞 丕賲賱
丕賱丿乇噩丞 侑佶 (丕賱兀爻賶)
賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱丨夭賳 賵丕賱禺爻乇丕賳 賵丕賱噩夭毓貙 丕賳賴丕 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱鬲賷 丕禺鬲亘乇鬲賴丕 丕睾賱亘 丕賱噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳 賲賳 賷亘賯賷 亘賴丕 賷丨賷丕 丨賷丕丞 賲賱丐賴丕 丕賱賳丿賲 賵丕賱丨乇賲丕賳貙 賮賷賴丕 丨丿丕丿 丿丕卅賲貙 賮賯丿丕賳 賵丨爻乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱賲丕囟賷貙 賴賷 丿乇噩丞 丕賱賮丕卮賱賷賳 賵丕賱匕賷賳 丕毓鬲丕丿賵丕 丕賱丕賳賴夭丕賲 賰兀爻賱賵亘 丨賷丕丞貙 賮賯丿賵丕 丨鬲賷 毓賲賱賴賲 賵丕氐丿賯丕卅賴賲 賵毓丕卅賱丕鬲賴賲 賵賮乇氐賴賲 賵氐丨鬲賴賲貙 丕賱禺爻丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丿孬 賱賴賲 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丕鬲 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 鬲噩毓賱賴賲 賷毓鬲丕丿賵賳 毓賱賷 丕賱兀爻賶貙 賮賴賳丕 賷乇賷 丕賱賲乇亍 丕賱丨夭賳 賮賷 賰賱 夭丕賵賷丞 賵鬲賮氐賷賱 賲賳 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丕賱賵噩賵丿
丕賳 丕丨丿 爻賲丕鬲 賴匕賴 丕賱丨丕賱丞 賴賷 丕賳 賲丕 鬲禺爻乇賴 賱賳 鬲毓賵囟賴 賵爻鬲亘賯賷 毓賱賷 丨丕賱賰 賱賷夭賷丿 兀爻丕賰貙 亘賱 丕匕丕 賲丕 禺爻乇鬲 卮禺氐丕 鬲丨亘賴貙 賮丕賳賰 爻鬲毓鬲亘乇 賵賰丕賳賰 禺爻乇鬲 丕賱丨亘 亘兀賰賲賱賴貙 賵賮賷 賲孬賱 賴匕賴 丕賱氐丿賲丕鬲 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷丞 賯丿 賷氐賱 丕賱丕賲乇 丕賱賷 丕丨亘丕胤 賲夭賲賳 賷賳鬲賴賷 亘丕賱賲賵鬲貙 賵毓賱賷 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 賰賵賳 丕賱兀爻賶 賲賯亘乇丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞貙 丕賱丕 丕賳賴 賷亘賯賷 丕賮囟賱 丨丕賱丕 賲賳 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞貙 賵毓賳丿賲丕 賷亘丿丕 卮禺氐 賲氐丿賵賲 賲氐丕亘 亘丕賱丕爻賶 亘丕賱亘賰丕亍 爻賳毓乇賮 丨賷賳賴丕 丕賳賴 亘丿丕 亘丕賱鬲丨爻賳貙
丕賱丿乇噩丞 佟贍贍 (丕賱禺賵賮)
丕賱禺賵賮 賴賵 賲丕 賷丿賷乇 噩夭亍丕 賰亘賷乇丕 賲賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賮賴賵 賷卮賰賱 丿丕賮毓丕 賱丕賮毓丕賱 賱丕 毓丿 賱賴丕貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱丕毓丿丕亍貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱卮賷禺賵禺丞貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲貙 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 禺爻丕乇丞 賲丨亘賵亘賰貙 丕賱丕賳馗賲丞 丕賱丿賷賰鬲丕鬲賵乇賷丞 鬲賱毓亘 毓賱賷 賵鬲賷乇丞 丕賱禺賵賮貙 丕賱丕毓賱丕賲 賷賱毓亘 毓賱賷 賵鬲賷乇丞 丕賱禺賵賮貙 丨丕賱賲丕 賷賱鬲賴賲賰 丕賱禺賵賮 爻鬲乇丕賴 賮賷 賰賱 卮賷亍 丨賵賱賰
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟佗佶 (丕賱乇睾亘丞)
丕賱乇睾亘丞 賴賷 賲賳 鬲賯賵丿賳丕 亘亘匕賱 毓馗賷賲 丕賱噩賴丿 亘睾賷丞 鬲丨賯賷賯 丕賴丿丕賮賳丕貙 賵賳賷賱 賲丕 賳爻鬲丨賯貙 賮丕賱乇睾亘丞 亘丕賱賲丕賱 賵丕賱賲賰丕賳丞 賵丕賱爻賱胤丞 賴賷 賲賳 鬲丿賷乇 丨賷丕丞 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲噩丕賵夭賵丕 丿丕賮毓 丕賱禺賵賮 丕賱匕賷 賷賯賷丿 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 丕賱乇睾亘丞 賯丿 鬲氐亘丨 賳賵毓丕 賲賳 丕賱丕丿賲丕賳 賯丿 賱丕 賷丿乇賰 氐丕丨亘賴丕 匕賱賰貙 賵 鬲氐亘丨 丕賱乇睾亘丞 卮睾賮丕 丕賰孬乇 丕賴賲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賳賮爻賴丕.
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟佶贍 (丕賱睾囟亘)
毓賱賷 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 賰賵賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷賯賵丿 賱賱賯鬲賱 賵丕賱丨乇賵亘貙 丕賱丕 丕賳賴 賷亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 鬲毓賲丿 賯鬲賱 丕賱匕丕鬲 賰兀睾賱亘 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 爻亘賯鬲賴貙 賱賱睾囟亘 賵噩賴丕賳 丕丨丿賴賲丕 賲丿賲乇 賵丕賱丕禺乇 賲毓賲乇貙 賮丕賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷毓鬲亘乇 賳賯胤丞 丕乇鬲賰丕夭 鬲賲賰賳 丕賱賲囟胤賴丿賷賳 賲賳 丕賱丕賳胤賱丕賯 賱賱丨乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳 丕賱睾囟亘 賷毓亘乇 毓賳 賳賮爻賴 亘丕賱丕爻鬲賷丕亍 賵丕賱丕賳鬲賯丕賲 賱匕賱賰 賮賴賵 禺胤賷乇 賵夭丕卅賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佟侑佶 (丕賱賮禺乇)
丕賱賮禺乇 賷賮乇賯 亘丿賱 丕賳 賷噩賲毓貙 賰賲丕 丕賳賴 賷賳囟賵賷 毓賱賷 賳鬲丕卅噩 賵禺賷賲丞貙 賵賮賷 爻亘賷賱賴 賷賲賵鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇賵賳貙 賵鬲匕亘丨 丕賱噩賷賵卮 亘毓囟賴丕 鬲丨鬲 卮毓丕乇 丕賱鬲賮丕禺乇 亘丕賱賵胤賳 丕賵 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賵 丕賱丨夭亘 丕賵 丕賱丿賷賳貙 賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱賮禺乇 丕賱乇卅賷爻賷丞 丕賱噩賴賱 賵丕賱廿賳賰丕乇貙 賮丕賱卮賮丕亍 賲賳 丕賱丕丿賲丕賳 賲孬賱丕 賲爻鬲丨賷賱 賮賷 丨丕賱 丕賳賰乇 丕賱賲乇亍 賱亘 賲卮賰賱鬲賴
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佗贍贍 (丕賱卮噩丕毓丞)
丕賳賴丕 丕賱丿乇噩賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮氐賱 丕賱夭賷賮 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞貙 丕賱丕賷噩丕亘賷 毓賳 丕賱爻賱亘賷貙 丕賱丕賰乇丕賴 毓賳 丕賱賯賵丞貙 賴賳丕 鬲亘丿丕 亘丕丿乇丕賰賴丕 賵賴賳丕 賷亘丿丕 毓賯賱賰 亘丕賱鬲賮鬲丨 賵丕賱丕爻鬲賰卮丕賮貙 賰賱 賲丕賴賵 丕丿賳賷 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賷爻鬲亘氐乇 丕賱毓丕賱賲 毓賱賷 丕賳賴 賷丕爻 賵亘丕卅爻 賵丨夭賷賳 賵賲乇毓亘貙 賱賰賳 賴賳丕 爻鬲乇丕賴 鬲丨丿賷丕 賵賲丨賮夭丕 賵賲孬賷乇丕貙 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 鬲毓賳賷 丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱禺賵囟 賮賷 睾賲丕乇 噩丿賷丿丞 賵丕賱乇睾亘丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 鬲賯賱亘丕鬲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賮賷 鬲毓賱賲 賲賴丕乇丕鬲 噩丿賷丿丞 賮賷 鬲賲賳賷丞 賲毓丕乇賮賰貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 爻鬲賲賳丨 胤丕賯丞 賱賱毓丕賱賲 亘賯丿乇 賲丕 鬲爻鬲賴賱賰貙 毓賱賷 毓賰爻 噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱丿賳賷丕 賮丕賳賴賲 賷爻鬲賴賱賰賵賳 胤丕賯丕鬲 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賰賰賱 亘賱丕 賲賯丕亘賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佗佶贍 (丕賱丨賷丕丿)
賴賳丕 鬲乇鬲賯賷 賮賵賯 丕賱丕囟丿丕丿貙 鬲亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 廿胤賱丕賯 丕賱兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱賲鬲毓爻賮丞貙 賵鬲氐亘丨 丕賰孬乇 賲乇賵賳丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵丕賱毓賷卮貙 賮丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 丨賷丕丿賷丕 賷鬲賳賷 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 睾賷乇 賲乇鬲亘胤 賳爻亘賷丕 亘丕賱賳鬲丕卅噩貙 賱丕 鬲賴鬲賲 賰孬賷乇丕 賱賱禺賵賮 丕賵 丕賱賮卮賱 丕賵 丕賱鬲賵鬲乇貙 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷賯賵賱 丕賱賲乇亍 賲孬賱丕 (丨爻賳丕 丕賳 賱賲 丕爻鬲胤毓 丕賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賵馗賷賮丞 賮爻兀丨氐賱 毓賱賷 睾賷乇賴丕)貙 丕賳賴丕 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱孬賯丞 亘丕賱賳賮爻貙 丨賷孬 賷爻鬲卮毓乇 丕賱賲乇亍 賯賵鬲賴貙 賵賱毓匕丕 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 鬲賴丿賷丿賴 亘爻賴賵賱丞貙 賮毓賱丕賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賴賷 丕賱孬賯丞 亘丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱毓賷卮 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賵亘賴匕丕 賮丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷鬲囟丨 亘丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱兀賲丕賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伲佟贍 (丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿)
丕賱丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賷毓賳賷 丕賳 丕賱賲乇亍 賯丿 鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賷 丕賱賲賯丕賵賲丞 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞貙 賵丕賳賴 賲賱鬲夭賲 亘丕賱賲卮丕乇賰丞貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 賷賲賷賱 丕賱賳丕爻 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷丕鬲 丕賱丕丿賳賷 賲賳 佗贍贍 丕賱賷 丕賳 賷賰賵賳賵丕 賲鬲夭賲鬲賷賳 賮丕賳 賮丕鬲丨丞 毓馗賷賲丞 鬲丨丿孬 賱賴賲 賮賷 賲爻鬲賵賷 伲佟贍
賱丿賷賴賲 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕爻鬲毓丕丿丞 鬲賵丕夭賳賴賲 亘毓丿 丕賱卮丿丕卅丿 賵丕賲賰丕賳賷鬲賴賲 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賲賳 丕賱鬲噩丕乇亘貙 賮丕賳賴賲 賷賲賷賱賵賳 丕賱賷 丕賳 賷賳賲賵丕 賯丿乇丕鬲賴賲 毓賱賷 鬲氐丨賷丨 丕禺胤丕卅賴賲 匕丕鬲賷丕貙 賵賱兀賳賴賲 爻賲丨賵丕 亘乇丨賷賱 丕賱賮禺乇 賵丕賱賰亘乇 賮丕賳賴賲 賷氐亘丨賵丕 毓賱賷 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱賳馗乇 賮賷 毓賷賵亘賴賲 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賵丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賲賳賴丕 賵賲賳 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伲佶贍 (丕賱賯亘賵賱)
賱賷爻 丕賱賯亘賵賱 卮賰賱丕 賲賳 兀卮賰丕賱 丕賱賱丕賲亘丕賱丕丞貙 亘賱 賴賵 丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丿賵賳 丕禺囟丕毓賴丕 賱丕噩賳丿丞 賲丕貙 丕賱卮禺氐 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賱丕 賷賴鬲賲 亘鬲丨丿賷丿 丕賱氐丨賷丨 賲賳 丕賱禺胤兀貙 亘賱 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賷噩丕丿 丨賱賵賱 賱賱賲卮丕賰賱 丕賱賵丕賯毓丞 亘丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱兀賲孬賱貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 賱丕 賷氐亘丨 賴賳丕賰 卮賷亍 賷爻賲賷 (丕賱禺丕乇噩) 賵賱丿賷賴 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 噩毓賱 丕賱賲乇亍 爻毓賷丿丕貙 賮丕賳賴 賷丿乇賰 丕賳 賲氐丿乇 丕賱爻毓丕丿賴 鬲賳亘毓 賲賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱貙 賵丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻 丕賲乇丕 賷毓胤賷賴 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 丕賵 賷爻賱亘賵賴 亘賱 賷禺賱賯 賲賳 丕賱丿丕禺賱
丕賱丿乇噩賴 伽贍贍 (丕賱毓賯賱)
丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱丨丕氐賱賷賳 毓賱賶 噩賵丕卅夭 賳賵亘賱 賵丕賱賯丕丿丞 丕賱賰亘丕乇 賵賯囟丕丞 丕賱賲丨丕賰賲 丕賱毓賱賷丕貙 毓賷賵亘賴 賴賷 丕賱賮卮賱 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮乇賷賯 亘賷賳 丕賱乇賲賵夭 賵賲丕 鬲乇賲夭 丕賱賷賴 丨賯丕貙 賵丕賱禺賱胤 丕賱丨丕氐賱 亘賷賳 毓賵丕賱賲 卮禺氐賷賴 賵賲賵囟賵毓賷丞 鬲丨丿 賲賳 賮賴賲 丕賱爻亘亘賷賴貙 丕賳 鬲乇賷 丕賱卮噩乇丞 賵 賷鬲賲 鬲噩丕賴賱 丕賱睾丕亘丞貙 賵賴賰匕丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賳 鬲氐亘丨 丕賱毓賯賱賳賴 賴賷 丕賱睾丕賷丞貙 賮丕賱毓賯賱 賲丨丿賵丿 賷毓噩夭 丕賳 賷賲賷夭 丕賱噩賵賴乇 賵 賷乇賷 賲丕 賵乇丕亍 丕賱丕卮賷丕亍
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佶贍贍 (丕賱丨亘)
丕賱丨亘 賴賳丕 賱賷爻 賴賵 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷 鬲噩丕賴 丕賱丕禺乇賷賳 賵丕賱匕賷 賯丿 賷夭賷丿 丕賵 賷賳賯氐 賵賮賯丕 賱鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱賲丨賷胤貙 丕賳賲丕 賴賵 丕賱丨亘 睾賷乇 丕賱賲卮乇賵胤 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲亘丿賱 賵丕賱乇丕爻禺貙 賵賴賵 賱賷爻 毓乇囟丞 賱賱鬲匕亘匕亘 賱丕賳 賲氐丿乇賴 賴賵 丿丕禺賱 丕賱卮禺氐貙 丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丨丕賱丞 賰賷賳賵賳丞 亘賴丕 賳爻賲賵 賵 賳乇鬲賯賷 賵 賳賲爻賷 睾賮賵乇賷賳貙 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩賴 賳鬲賲賰賳 賲賳 乇丐賷丞 丕賱噩賵賴乇 賵 賮賴賲賴 毓賱賷 毓賰爻 丕賱毓賯賱貙 賷乇賰夭 丕賱丨亘 毓賱賷 賲丕 賴賵 禺賷乇 賵賷賳賲賷 賲丕 賴賵 丕賷噩丕亘賷 賵賷毓丕賱噩 丕賱爻賱亘賷丞 亘丿賱 賲賴丕噩賲鬲賴丕 丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佶伽贍 (丕賱賮乇丨)
賰賱賲丕 丕氐亘丨 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賲卮乇賵胤丕 賰賱賲丕 賯丕爻 丕賱賲乇亍 賮乇丨丕 丿丕禺賱賷丕貙 賵賴匕丕 賱賷爻 賮乇丨丕 賲賮丕噩卅 賲丐賯鬲 賳丕亘毓 毓賳 毓賵丕賲賱 禺丕乇噩賷賴貙 亘賱 卮毓賵乇 丿丕卅賲 賷乇丕賮賯 賰賱 丕賮毓丕賱賰貙 賮賷 丕毓丕賱賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 爻鬲乇賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賲賳丕乇丕 亘丕賱噩賲丕賱 丕賱亘賴賷 賵丕賱賰賲丕賱 賮賷 賰賱 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲貙 爻鬲卮毓乇 丕賳 賰賱 丕賱丕賲賵乇 鬲丨丿孬 丿賵賳 噩賴丿 賵亘丕賱鬲夭丕賲賳 亘毓囟賴丕 亘亘毓囟貙 爻鬲乇賷 賰賱 卮賷亍 賴賵 鬲噩賱 賱賱賲丨亘賴 賵丕賱廿賱賴貙 賯丿 賷乇丕賰 丕賱賳丕爻 賰賲毓噩夭丞 亘賷賳賴賲 賵 賰兀賳 胤丕賯鬲賰 賴賷 胤丕賯丞 丕賱賰賵賳 亘丕賰賲賱賴貙 爻鬲賲鬲賱賰 乇睾亘丞 賮賷 賳賮毓 丕賱丨賷丕丞 亘丕賰賲賱賴丕 丿賵賳 丕卮禺丕氐 賲毓賷賳賷賳貙 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 賲丨亘丞 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賮賷 丕賳 賵丕丨丿 鬲毓賵丿 賱賲毓乇賮丞 丕賳賴 賰賱賲丕 丕丨亘亘鬲 丕賰孬乇 賰賳鬲 賯丕丿乇丕 毓賱賷 丕賱丨亘 丕賰孬乇
丕賱丿乇噩賴 佴贍贍 (丕賱爻賱丕賲)
賴匕賴 丕賱丿乇噩丞 賷賲賰賳 賵氐賮賴丕 亘丕賱鬲賮賵賯貙 毓賳丿賲丕 賳氐賱 丕賱賷賴丕 賷鬲賱丕卮賷 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 亘賷賳 賲丕賴賵 卮禺氐賷 賵賲丕 賴賵 賲賵囟賵毓賷貙 賵賮賷賴丕 賷亘鬲毓丿 丕賱賲乇亍 亘卮禺氐賴 毓賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱丕毓鬲賷丕丿賷貙 賮賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷賰乇爻賴 賱賷氐亘丨 賲毓賱賲丕 乇賵丨丕賳賷丕貙 賵賲賳賴賲 賲賳 賷毓賲賱 亘丕賱馗賱 賱賲賳賮毓丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 噩賲毓丕亍貙 賵賴丐賱丕亍 賲賳 賷胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴賲 賱賯亘 丕賱賯丿賷爻賷賳 毓賱賷 賲乇 丕賱夭賲賳
丕賱丿乇噩賴 侑贍贍-佟贍贍贍 (丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕乇丞)
丕賳賴 賲爻鬲賵賷 兀賰孬乇 丕賱賳丕爻 乇賮毓丞貙 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲賵丨丿賵丕 賲毓 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 丕賱乇賵丨丕賳賷丞 丕賱丕爻賲賷 賵鬲亘毓賴賲 丕賱亘卮乇 毓賱賷 賲乇 丕賱夭賲賳貙 丕賳賴 毓賱賷 匕乇賵丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱亘卮乇賷 丕賱賯氐賵賷貙 鬲毓丕賱賷賲賴賲 鬲乇鬲賮毓 亘賵毓賷 丕賱噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓丕賲丞貙 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷毓賳賷 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賮賷 丕賱賳毓賷賲 賮賷 丕賱爻賱丕賲 丕賱賲胤賱賯貙 賮賷賴丕 賷鬲噩丕賵夭 賵噩賵丿 丕賱賲乇亍 丕賱夭賲丕賳 賵丕賱賲賰丕賳 賵賱丕 賷毓乇賮 亘 (丕賳丕)貙 丕賳 丕毓馗賲 賲賳 賵氐賱 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賷 賷胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴 賱賯亘 丕賱爻賷丿 亘兀噩賱 賲毓丕賳賷賴 丕賱爻賷丿 毓賷爻賷 亘賳 賲乇賷賲 賵 爻賷丿 丕賱禺賱賯 賲丨賲丿 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲
August 30, 2010
At the time of reading this book I appreciate the overall positive ideas and am glad to have had the exposure to all the various concepts and ideas mentioned in the book - especially the informaiton about the great organization Alcoholics Anonomous and various scientific concepts and theories - good karma there. I think, however, the desire to back up the theory and prove it all true through Applied Kinesiology, and a 1-1000 logrithimic based scale, etc. does greatly discredit an otherwise pretty good and seemingly intuitive way of looking at the human condition and life. This book was valuable in that it did cause me to recall that AK was once demonstrated to me, as one exercise of many, during a very impactful and to me valuable leadership training seminar several years ago. It seemed reasonable enough during that ordeal I suppose, but since I forgot it I guess I never bought into it. I do agree with Dr. Hawkins that everything is interconnected, and that the outcomes we all come to know can be and probably are influenced by things nobody realizes.
So the two stars are I suppose because I see myself as a lover of the truth, but this book is a case of the spititual/religious trying to make or use people's ideas of science to prove or validate itself (pseudoscience). And the darn thing about that is much of the writing is so uplifting and good - and as a fan of Bhudism and Christianity I think the basic idea is right - so why does it even need to try and do that. Another strange thing is I can't find out anything about Dr. Hawkins on Wikipedia, even though I know he's a big name out there. Weird.
So the two stars are I suppose because I see myself as a lover of the truth, but this book is a case of the spititual/religious trying to make or use people's ideas of science to prove or validate itself (pseudoscience). And the darn thing about that is much of the writing is so uplifting and good - and as a fan of Bhudism and Christianity I think the basic idea is right - so why does it even need to try and do that. Another strange thing is I can't find out anything about Dr. Hawkins on Wikipedia, even though I know he's a big name out there. Weird.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
March 14, 2020
A different book then I have ever read, yet one with wisdom and a way to determine truth by using muscle testing. Imagine, what if you had access to a simple yes-or-no answer to any question you wished to asked? Any question...think about it. Power is much stronger than force., but 85% of people life by force - fear, anger, shame, guilt, apathy, desire, pride - all these are negative and weaken us. It show how we can overcome this and adopt characteristics like Courage, Willingness, Acceptance, Reason, Love, Joy, Peace, Enlightenment. Want to find out how? Read the book.
May 3, 2022
Needed a tinfoil hat to digest a lot of the claims in this book. Mainly disappointed
October 28, 2014
This idea on p. 108 has transformed the way I see motivation and how to inspire my children.
Power Vs. Force by
p.108
鈥淥n examination we will see that power arises from meaning. It has to do with motive and it has to do with principle. Power is always associated with that which supports the significance of life itself and dignifies- ennobles. Force must always be justified, whereas power requires no justification. Force is associated with the partial, power with the whole.
鈥淚f we analyze the nature of force it becomes readily apparent why it must always succumb to power; thus is in accordance with one basic lay of physics. Because force automatically creates counter-force, its effect is limited by definition we could say that force is a movement. It goes from here to there, or tries to go from here to there against opposition. Power, on the other hand, is still. It is like a standing field that does not move. Gravity itself, for instance, does not move against anything. Its power moves all objects with its field, but the gravity itself does not move.
鈥淔orce always moves against something, whereas power does not move against anything. Force is incomplete and therefore has to constantly be fed energy. Power is total and complete in itself and requires nothing from outside itself. It makes no demands; it has no needs. Because force has an insatiable appetite, it constantly consumes. Power, in contrast, energizes, gives forth, supplies and supports. Power gives life and energy. Force takes these away. We notice that power is associated with compassion and makes us fell positively about ourselves. Force is associated with judgment and makes us feel badly about ourselves.
鈥淔orce always creates counter-force; its effect is to polarize rather than unify. Polarization always implies conflict; its cost, therefore, is always high. Because force incites polarization, it鈥檚 inevitably produces a win / lose dichotomy, and because somebody always loses, enemies are always created. Constantly faced with enemies, force requires constant defense. Defensiveness is costly鈥︹€�
Power just is! When we connect with that power, we stand as if in sunshine. When we use force, we step outside that light. The result in the end is something completely different than what we thought the force would do. Force incites the powers of darkness and the results are within that sphere.
This principle is transforming the way that I think and act. Thank you Dr Hawkins!
Power Vs. Force by
p.108
鈥淥n examination we will see that power arises from meaning. It has to do with motive and it has to do with principle. Power is always associated with that which supports the significance of life itself and dignifies- ennobles. Force must always be justified, whereas power requires no justification. Force is associated with the partial, power with the whole.
鈥淚f we analyze the nature of force it becomes readily apparent why it must always succumb to power; thus is in accordance with one basic lay of physics. Because force automatically creates counter-force, its effect is limited by definition we could say that force is a movement. It goes from here to there, or tries to go from here to there against opposition. Power, on the other hand, is still. It is like a standing field that does not move. Gravity itself, for instance, does not move against anything. Its power moves all objects with its field, but the gravity itself does not move.
鈥淔orce always moves against something, whereas power does not move against anything. Force is incomplete and therefore has to constantly be fed energy. Power is total and complete in itself and requires nothing from outside itself. It makes no demands; it has no needs. Because force has an insatiable appetite, it constantly consumes. Power, in contrast, energizes, gives forth, supplies and supports. Power gives life and energy. Force takes these away. We notice that power is associated with compassion and makes us fell positively about ourselves. Force is associated with judgment and makes us feel badly about ourselves.
鈥淔orce always creates counter-force; its effect is to polarize rather than unify. Polarization always implies conflict; its cost, therefore, is always high. Because force incites polarization, it鈥檚 inevitably produces a win / lose dichotomy, and because somebody always loses, enemies are always created. Constantly faced with enemies, force requires constant defense. Defensiveness is costly鈥︹€�
Power just is! When we connect with that power, we stand as if in sunshine. When we use force, we step outside that light. The result in the end is something completely different than what we thought the force would do. Force incites the powers of darkness and the results are within that sphere.
This principle is transforming the way that I think and act. Thank you Dr Hawkins!
January 10, 2019
" 丕賱亘丕乇毓賵賳 賱丕 賷購毓乇賻賮賵賳.. 賷亘丿賵賳 兀賳丕爻丕賸 亘爻胤丕亍 .. 賲賳 賷毓賷 賴匕丕 賷毓賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞.. 賵賲賳 賷毓賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賷丿乇賰 兀賳賴丕 丕賱賯賵丞 丕賱乇賯賷賯丞.. 鬲賱賰 丕賱賯賵丞 鬲丨乇賰 賰賱 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 .. 賵賱賷爻 賱賴丕 丕爻賲"
丕亘鬲丿兀 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賰鬲丕亘賴 亘賴匕丕 丕賱廿賴丿丕亍 丕賱噩賲賷賱 噩丿丕賸. 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵囟毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丨噩乇 兀爻丕爻 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 賲賳賴噩賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賰丕賲賱丞. 賲賵囟丨丕賸 爻賷丕爻丞 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵胤乇賯 賲毓乇賮丞 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賲賳 丨賵賱賳丕 亘賳丕亍賸 毓賱賶 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱匕賷 賵囟毓賴丕 亘賳馗乇丞 卮賲賵賱賷丞 鬲乇丕毓賷 賳賴賲 丕賱亘丕丨孬.
賵賵囟賾丨 丿賵乇 丕賱賵毓賷 賮賷 噩賵丕賳亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱賰孬賷乇丞 噩丿丕賸.
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 丕賱兀賵賱 賲賳 囟賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 丕丨丿賶 毓卮乇丞 賰鬲丕亘.
丕亘鬲丿兀 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賰鬲丕亘賴 亘賴匕丕 丕賱廿賴丿丕亍 丕賱噩賲賷賱 噩丿丕賸. 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵囟毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丨噩乇 兀爻丕爻 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱賵毓賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 賲賳賴噩賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賰丕賲賱丞. 賲賵囟丨丕賸 爻賷丕爻丞 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 賵胤乇賯 賲毓乇賮丞 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賲賳 丨賵賱賳丕 亘賳丕亍賸 毓賱賶 禺乇賷胤丞 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱匕賷 賵囟毓賴丕 亘賳馗乇丞 卮賲賵賱賷丞 鬲乇丕毓賷 賳賴賲 丕賱亘丕丨孬.
賵賵囟賾丨 丿賵乇 丕賱賵毓賷 賮賷 噩賵丕賳亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱賰孬賷乇丞 噩丿丕賸.
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 丕賱兀賵賱 賲賳 囟賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 丕丨丿賶 毓卮乇丞 賰鬲丕亘.
February 14, 2018
Another read by my hubs that is inexplicably linked to my GR account. Some day I鈥檒l figure out how to unlink them. Today is not that day. 馃槾
January 15, 2020
It did manage to read like 152 pages... First, like 60 pages he is talking about how awesome this technique is and that "scientific" world just does not get it how cool it is... Then he tells technique. Take your hand, the second person pushes it and if it weakens than is "no", it stays strong than is "yes" and you can check anything with it.. and there is a scale - ok it was a nice part of a book. The scale is between 0 - 1000 and like "breakpoint" is on 200. If you above that you are good. Also, if I understood and remember correctly the difference between 200 and 400 is not double. Here if you are 200 it means that your power is 10 to the power of 200 and if you are 300 it means you are 10 to the power of 300. so the difference is huge. He estimates Einstein, Freud shy before 500. Then he says that the book is calibrated to be 700! ha and then he tells how you can use this technique to create a breakthrough in science. It is easy. And Thomas Edison just waisted his time... only if he would know this technique... I can agree that it can work when you say truth or lie but come on... I will try it on choosing lottery number, if I win I will come back here and say I was wrong and I'm sorry :D I'm just sad that he wrote the book, in time which he spent on writing it he could with this marvelous technique change a world and find a cure for AIDS/HIV, cancer, hunger, etc... but he chose a book!
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
May 13, 2020
* The rating does not reflect the true value of this book and is the outcome of two vectors:
1) a negative one, ie. the testing by means of behavioral kinesiology, the need to present the findings as scientifically proven, underlying contradictions in the theory, and the attempts to justify his system by quantum theory;
2) a positive one which is a story of a psychiatric doctor, who suffered himself and came up with a value system which helped him to bootstrap his recovery.
If I were to recommend this book, it would be with the following qualification:
Skip chapters 1-3. Seriously. Do not read them. It is mumbo-jumbo and could be dangerous if you believe in the tool that would answer all your questions.
Read chapter 4. Levels of human consciousness could give you some food for thought and help you in understanding human motivations. It could be very useful in life.
You can read chapter 5 with a pinch of salt
Skip chapters 6 & 7. It's delirium and confusion in search of potential markets for the pseudoscience.
As for the rest of the book, you can safely skim and choose the selected chapters which might give you some value, eg. surviving success.
And read with caution. Doctor doctor, as the author used to call himself, is manipulative. He can bring some value to the table but then he can hijack your thoughts, if you are not careful. You have to be very selective in what you will accept. :)
1) a negative one, ie. the testing by means of behavioral kinesiology, the need to present the findings as scientifically proven, underlying contradictions in the theory, and the attempts to justify his system by quantum theory;
2) a positive one which is a story of a psychiatric doctor, who suffered himself and came up with a value system which helped him to bootstrap his recovery.
If I were to recommend this book, it would be with the following qualification:
Skip chapters 1-3. Seriously. Do not read them. It is mumbo-jumbo and could be dangerous if you believe in the tool that would answer all your questions.
Read chapter 4. Levels of human consciousness could give you some food for thought and help you in understanding human motivations. It could be very useful in life.
You can read chapter 5 with a pinch of salt
Skip chapters 6 & 7. It's delirium and confusion in search of potential markets for the pseudoscience.
As for the rest of the book, you can safely skim and choose the selected chapters which might give you some value, eg. surviving success.
And read with caution. Doctor doctor, as the author used to call himself, is manipulative. He can bring some value to the table but then he can hijack your thoughts, if you are not careful. You have to be very selective in what you will accept. :)
March 4, 2020
Absolutely unbelievable. Whatever nuggets of truth exist in this pseudoscientific excuse for an informative book are buried beneath layers and layers of inconsistent, unsubstantiated conjecture repeated over and over again but phrased in deliberately perplexing ways. And claiming, among other outrageous assertions, that all poor people have inherently "lower" levels of consciousness by virtue of being, well, poor? Really? I started out with high hopes for this book, but I couldn't even finish it out of sheer disgust (and so, obviously, based on that alone, I must calibrate under 200!). If you're looking for a book that says what this failed to, check out or, really, anything by Richard Bach. I'll be over here trying not to set Power Versus Force on fire.
September 2, 2014
Picking up this book was probably one of the best things I have ever done for my own growth and development. Hawkins was my mentors mentor and was quite prolific in his own right. I found this book to be mentally invigorating and spiritually resonant. My favorite books are the ones that change the mind of the reader, thereby changing the way they view the world. This book took my stagnant lens and turned it around and around until I found myself viewing a world I had glazed over with mis-creations. I did not read it in sequential order, which the author advises in his foreword, and found that to be a revolutionary way to let my spirit guide my learning. It was a faster read this way, my mind never strayed, and for those of us who require scientific rhetoric to explain spiritual experiences this novel rises to the occasion without reading like an outdated textbook.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 867 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.