Dramas, such as The Seagull (1896, revised 1898), and including "A Dreary Story" (1889) of Russian writer Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, also Chekov, concern the inability of humans to communicate.
Born (袗薪褌芯薪 袩邪胁谢芯胁懈褔 效械褏芯胁) in the small southern seaport of Taganrog, the son of a grocer. His grandfather, a serf, bought his own freedom and that of his three sons in 1841. He also taught to read. A cloth merchant fathered Yevgenia Morozova, his mother.
"When I think back on my childhood," Chekhov recalled, "it all seems quite gloomy to me." Tyranny of his father, religious fanaticism, and long nights in the store, open from five in the morning till midnight, shadowed his early years. He attended a school for Greek boys in Taganrog from 1867 to 1868 and then Taganrog grammar school. Bankruptcy of his father compelled the family to move to Moscow. At the age of 16 years in 1876, independent Chekhov for some time alone in his native town supported through private tutoring.
In 1879, Chekhov left grammar school and entered the university medical school at Moscow. In the school, he began to publish hundreds of short comics to support his mother, sisters and brothers. Nicholas Leikin published him at this period and owned Oskolki (splinters), the journal of Saint Petersburg. His subjected silly social situations, marital problems, and farcical encounters among husbands, wives, mistresses, and lust; even after his marriage, Chekhov, the shy author, knew not much of whims of young women.
Nenunzhaya pobeda, first novel of Chekhov, set in 1882 in Hungary, parodied the novels of the popular M贸r J贸kai. People also mocked ideological optimism of J贸kai as a politician.
Chekhov graduated in 1884 and practiced medicine. He worked from 1885 in Peterburskaia gazeta.
In 1886, Chekhov met H.S. Suvorin, who invited him, a regular contributor, to work for Novoe vremya, the daily paper of Saint Petersburg. He gained a wide fame before 1886. He authored The Shooting Party, his second full-length novel, later translated into English. Agatha Christie used its characters and atmosphere in later her mystery novel The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. First book of Chekhov in 1886 succeeded, and he gradually committed full time. The refusal of the author to join the ranks of social critics arose the wrath of liberal and radical intelligentsia, who criticized him for dealing with serious social and moral questions but avoiding giving answers. Such leaders as Leo Tolstoy and Nikolai Leskov, however, defended him. "I'm not a liberal, or a conservative, or a gradualist, or a monk, or an indifferentist. I should like to be a free artist and that's all..." Chekhov said in 1888.
The failure of The Wood Demon, play in 1889, and problems with novel made Chekhov to withdraw from literature for a period. In 1890, he traveled across Siberia to Sakhalin, remote prison island. He conducted a detailed census of ten thousand convicts and settlers, condemned to live on that harsh island. Chekhov expected to use the results of his research for his doctoral dissertation. Hard conditions on the island probably also weakened his own physical condition. From this journey came his famous travel book.
Chekhov practiced medicine until 1892. During these years, Chechov developed his concept of the dispassionate, non-judgmental author. He outlined his program in a letter to his brother Aleksandr: "1. Absence of lengthy verbiage of political-social-economic nature; 2. total objectivity; 3. truthful descriptions of persons and objects; 4. extreme brevity; 5. audacity and originality; flee the stereotype; 6. compassion." Because he objected that the paper conducted against Alfred Dreyfus, his friendship with Suvorin ended
Very short, yet it packs a bundle of emotion. Swang Song is a great look at lost life and regrets, career over personal relationships and that one drunk friend you just cannot get rid off because he keeps babbling on way into the early hours. It is a smidge of life in an honest and simple scene. Why not use up to twenty minutes of your own life to enjoy it? I say it is worth it.
Alla fine di uno spettacolo un attore, Svetlovidov, ormai avanti negli anni e ubriaco, si addormenta per risvegliarsi da solo e con il teatro al buio. Sono momenti di panico per lui in cui sente le forze abbandonarlo e quel teatro nero diventare sepolcro della sua vita, e in cui la sua vita cos矛 come il suo mestiere gli appare vuoto e vacuo. 鈥淐apii allora che non esiste nessuna sacralit脿 dell'arte, che 猫 tutto delirio e inganno, che io sono uno schiavo, un giocattolo dell'ozio altrui, un buffone, un pagliaccio!鈥� L鈥檌ncontro inatteso con il suggeritore gli permette di ricordare i fasti della sua carriera, rivivere emozioni che credeva perdute, splendere con le sue piume bianche in un ultimo canto del cigno. Un dramma forte, in cui la morte si accosta alla vita, la luce all鈥檕mbra, in cui gli opposti si bilanciano rendendo lo scritto potente. Riflessioni sulla vita che scivola lo accompagnano.
Ok, ok. Yes I read this because it's short and I'm behind in my reading challange. Sue me. I also remember liking Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard in college and am a sucker for Russian literature. This is a one act play that can be read in 15-20 minutes. It has dramatic tension and a plot. The characters are believable and drew my sympathy. That being said, I also felt it was over too soon...like a well made short film that you wish was a bit longer. I would like to see it acted sometime when I want to be a little sad.
I could feel the main character's despair, his joy, then despair again. He had given his life to entertain others, pouring himself into his career, and neglected to live his life to the full. That's a theme that will never be outdated. Regrets not of things done, but of opportunities not taken.
This is a one-act-play with only two characters: Vasili Svietlovidoff, a 68 year old comic actor and Nikita Ivanich, who is an even older man, the theater's prompter.
Chekhov's hero finds himself locked in a theatre and who, attended only by a prompter, dwells on impending death, the life unlived and memories of past glories. His thoughts reflected on whether it is still worth living or whether he should crawl towards death. Eventually he chose life, with Shakespeare to guide him. The best bits are the quotations from Aeschylus and Shakespeare, but the piece has nothing much to tell us other than that theatre is a house of dreams.
This is a one-act plays for people who have a special feeling for acting in a theater. It is a short short play with only two characters, a leading actor who wakes up at night having fallen asleep after acting in a play, and Nikita, a prompter who lives in the theater;. Even at this early stage in his career, is on top of his game, as the actor, just from discussing his misgivings about his career, seems to find himself in the middle of his conversation and leaves the theater feeling energized.
Uma pe莽a t茫o sucinta e simultaneamente tematicamente abrangente. Tendo o actor como figura central, a rela莽茫o que este possui com o p煤blico, consigo mesmo e com o amplo espa莽o teatral, ao longo do tempo.
"No jantar de hoje, muito vinho e cerveja devo ter bebido, Meu Deus! Sinto vapores de 谩lcool em todo o corpo e mais de vinte l铆nguas pastosas na boca..."
As humans who have to face our mortality sooner or later, we tend to think and reminisce of our "glory days." The main character in this play is realizing his destructibility; his old age; his closeness to death and its irreversibility. And so, he begins to recite Shakespearean stanzas to prove that he is still a magnificent actor and a genius of the theatrical world. He hasn't lost his mind yet.
Many writers have touched the theme of an imminent death - none as brilliantly as it is expressed in The Death Of a Salesman, but still, Chekhov's play is a worthy contender.
Es bien sabido q yo amo a Ch茅jov pero tener que relacionar este texto con otros dos que son m谩s bien estudios dram谩ticos me est谩 drenando pq que co帽o se supone que tengo que sacar yo de estas 6 paginitas...en fin besos
Like every time I read Chekhov, I find myself fighting wordlessness. I don't know how to express what his plays do to my mind. This simple, comedic, one-scene drama is no exception.
I am very partial to my Elisaveta Fen translation and this (relatively) new Paul Schmidt translation is quite different, but he does bring an aspect to Chekhov's work that I think Anton would appreciate - that is, the voice of the people of our age. I'm interested to compare translations to see how they diverge.
A one -act play , with only two characters , it could as well have been a soliloquoy by an old thespian , who contemplates his mortality and the bitter truth of his momentary, ephemeral existence in this world .
I'll not get into the details as so many reviews have, as I'm not one to bore people with redundancy. The idea that as one edges closer to the end of his/her life, one can have moments of panic. I am speaking as an older lady myself.... I have just recently entered my 6th decade. We as older homo sapiens tend to 'look back' and glamorize our high points and go below the basement on our regrets.
This little story of that aged old man hit a chord with me, and I laughed inwardly, 'There but for the grace of God go I'.... Except thankfully, I've not ever cottoned on to the drink. I tried to, but I failed miserably at it. That my friends is another story, and this is not about me. But doesn't that tell you something? This story...made me think inwardly. And that is what good writing is all about. Thank you, Dear Mr Chekhov
Reminiscent of Cobain's "it's better to burn out than to fade away" as well as Bukowski's "And when nobody waits for you at night . . . what do you call it, freedom or loneliness?'