Anti Science Books

Anti Science

Antiscience is a position that rejects science and the scientific method. People holding antiscientific views do not accept science as an objective method that can generate universal knowledge. They also contend that scientific reductionism in particular is an inherently limited means to reach understanding of a complex world.

Anti Science Books

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution

Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design

Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong

Studies in Flood Geology a Compilation of Research Studies Supporting Creation and the Flood

The New Answers Book 2: Over 30 Questions on Evolution/Creation and the Bible

The New Answers Book 3: Over 35 Questions on Evolution/Creation and the Bible

The Global Flood: A biblical and scientific look at the catastrophe that changed the earth (Answers in Genesis Pocket Guides)

The Genius of Ancient Man: Evolution's Nightmare!

More anti science books...

Related Genres

厂肠颈别苍肠别鈥�
Science
Skepticism
Conspiracy Theories
Pseudoscience
Eugenics

Fundamentalism
Anti Intellectualism
Creation Science
Denialism
Climate Change Denial
Pseudomedicine

Featured News & Interviews

Readers' Most Anticipated April Books

Read 禄

Quotes Tagged 鈥淎nti Science鈥�

“ Treating Abuse Today (Tat), 3(4), pp. 26-33 Freyd: I see what you're saying but people in psychology don't have a uniform agreement on this issue of the depth of -- I guess the term that was used at the conference was -- "robust repression." TAT: Well, Pamela, there's a whole lot of evidence that people dissociate traumatic things. What's interesting to me is how the concept of "dissociation" is side-stepped in favor of "repression." I don't think it's as much about repression as it is about tr Treating Abuse Today (Tat), 3(4), pp. 26-33 Freyd: I see what you're saying but people in psychology don't have a uniform agreement on this issue of the depth of -- I guess the term that was used at the conference was -- "robust repression." TAT: Well, Pamela, there's a whole lot of evidence that people dissociate traumatic things. What's interesting to me is how the concept of "dissociation" is side-stepped in favor of "repression." I don't think it's as much about repression as it is about traumatic amnesia and dissociation. That has been documented in a variety of trauma survivors. Army psychiatrists in the Second World War, for instance, documented that following battles, many soldiers had amnesia for the battles. Often, the memories wouldn't break through until much later when they were in psychotherapy. Freyd: But I think I mentioned Dr. Loren Pankratz. He is a psychologist who was studying veterans for post-traumatic stress in a Veterans Administration Hospital in Portland. They found some people who were admitted to Veteran's hospitals for postrraumatic stress in Vietnam who didn't serve in Vietnam. They found at least one patient who was being treated who wasn't even a veteran. Without external validation, we just can't know -- TAT: -- Well, we have external validation in some of our cases. Freyd: In this field you're going to find people who have all levels of belief, understanding, experience with the area of repression. As I said before it's not an area in which there's any kind of uniform agreement in the field. The full notion of repression has a meaning within a psychoanalytic framework and it's got a meaning to people in everyday use and everyday language. What there is evidence for is that any kind of memory is reconstructed and reinterpreted. It has not been shown to be anything else. Memories are reconstructed and reinterpreted from fragments. Some memories are true and some memories are confabulated and some are downright false. TAT: It is certainly possible for in offender to dissociate a memory. It's possible that some of the people who call you could have done or witnessed some of the things they've been accused of -- maybe in an alcoholic black-out or in a dissociative state -- and truly not remember. I think that's very possible. Freyd: I would say that virtually anything is possible. But when the stories include murdering babies and breeding babies and some of the rather bizarre things that come up, it's mighty puzzling. TAT: I've treated adults with dissociative disorders who were both victimized and victimizers. I've seen previously repressed memories of my clients' earlier sexual offenses coming back to them in therapy. You guys seem to be saying, be skeptical if the person claims to have forgotten previously, especially if it is about something horrible. Should we be equally skeptical if someone says "I'm remembering that I perpetrated and I didn't remember before. It's been repressed for years and now it's surfacing because of therapy." I ask you, should we have the same degree of skepticism for this type of delayed-memory that you have for the other kind? Freyd: Does that happen? TAT: Oh, yes. A lot. ...more ”
― David L. Calof

2 likes

“ Des r茅sultats qui apparaissent pour la premi猫re fois dans des rapports ou des livres, m锚me 脿 gros tirage, n'ont aucune fiabilit茅. Tout simplement parce que ces publications n'ont pas pass茅 le filtre du contr么le par les pairs. Les 茅diteurs n'ont 茅videmment pas la capacit茅 d'expertise du monde acad茅mique et leur premier souci est plus de s'assurer du potentiel de vente d'un livre que de la parfaite l茅gitimit茅 scientifique des arguments que l'on y trouve. Par ailleurs, un livre qui se glorifie de p ...more ”
― Pierre Cahuc, Le N茅gationnisme 茅conomique. Et comment s'en d茅barrasser (ESSAIS)

0 likes

More quotes...

欧宝娱乐

Anti Science

Anti Science Books

Related Genres

Featured News & Interviews

Quotes Tagged 鈥淎nti Science鈥�

Tags