From the Bookshelf of On Paths Unknown…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

I find myself shocked at the awards this book has won and the praise heaped upon it. How on Gods� Earth could a book about Gods walking on the Earth among mortals be so pedestrian? Somehow Gaiman managed to turn a potentially cool premise into something boring. For those who love this book—and I know it is many—please forgive the sarcasm to follow as I blaspheme against the beloved Gaiman. But Gods help me, the more I read, the more I hated American Gods.
First off, while the premise sounds inter ...more
First off, while the premise sounds inter ...more

"Many things prove to me that the gods take part in the affairs of man." - Herodotus
In Gaiman’s story, the converse is equally true: the very existence of the gods depends on the affairs of mankind, specifically, that people believe in them. Like mortals, they need to be loved.
Gods from cultures around the world travelled to the US in the minds of immigrants. The indigenous people already had their own gods, and now (2001) there are new gods as well: internet, capitalism, media etc. In a mater ...more
In Gaiman’s story, the converse is equally true: the very existence of the gods depends on the affairs of mankind, specifically, that people believe in them. Like mortals, they need to be loved.
Gods from cultures around the world travelled to the US in the minds of immigrants. The indigenous people already had their own gods, and now (2001) there are new gods as well: internet, capitalism, media etc. In a mater ...more

a protagonist, Shadow. calm, collected, quiet, passive, cagey, a tough guy and a sensitive guy. his life has been about reacting and not impacting. he moves through his story as if through a dream; tragedies and betrayals and mysteries and confidence games, the beginnings and endings of hope and love and life - all viewed as if through water, as if these terrible wonders were happening to someone else. he could be nothing more than a pawn in life - let alone a pawn of the gods - but yet his pass
...more
![[Name Redacted]](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1347082397p2/287915.jpg)
Neil Gaiman is my favorite author, and I have loved the study of comparative religions since I first learned to read, so I expected to love this book. Instead I found myself constantly disappointed by what amounted to little more than a prose re-hash of everything he had done in his far-superior "The Sandman" graphic novel series (but with more "grit", which I suspect he added to ensure he would be taken seriously as a prose-writer for adults) filtered through the lens of Pratchett's vastly supe
...more

After loving the Sandman comics and getting a few good laughs out of Good Omens, I decided to finally give Neil Gaiman's prose (solo that is) a fair shake. It was 2003, and I knew that American Gods had recently won the Hugo, so I decided to make it my choice.
I vaguely remember enjoying the experience, but I distinctly remember thinking it was an orgy of ideas where none received the attention I craved or they deserved. The idea of the Old Gods doing battle with the New Gods across the United S ...more
I vaguely remember enjoying the experience, but I distinctly remember thinking it was an orgy of ideas where none received the attention I craved or they deserved. The idea of the Old Gods doing battle with the New Gods across the United S ...more
![[Name Redacted]](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1347082397p2/287915.jpg)
Well, I HAD a review. Apparently sometime before July 22nd, 2013, it disappeared.
Long-story-short, I didn't enjoy this. At all. It felt like Gaiman was simultaneously trying to translate the mythos he'd established in his "Sandman" comics to prose (unsuccessfully) while also trying to assert that he was a writer for adults and not just funny-books (desperately). Neither really worked for me. None of the characters were especially likable, sympathetic or compelling, and the whole thing felt almos ...more
Long-story-short, I didn't enjoy this. At all. It felt like Gaiman was simultaneously trying to translate the mythos he'd established in his "Sandman" comics to prose (unsuccessfully) while also trying to assert that he was a writer for adults and not just funny-books (desperately). Neither really worked for me. None of the characters were especially likable, sympathetic or compelling, and the whole thing felt almos ...more

Feb 20, 2018
Jlawrence
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
re-reads,
s-lswordchallenge
Hearing raves about the STARZ adaptation of this book, I determined to devote some binge time to to the series, but wondered if I should re-read the book first. It's been 15 years or so, and I only had a hazy recollection and middling opinion of it (Gaiman's Sandman is one my all time-favorites, but American Gods had not left a strong impression). The advice of those who had both read and seen it was to give it a re-read first, as the series adds more backstory to several of the characters.
I enj ...more
I enj ...more

This will never be my favourite of Neil Gaiman's novels - it's just too messy, too sprawling - but the full cast audio version is excellent. At first I wondered how all the different voices would come together - it's a full read through, not a dramatisation - but actually it works very well. It does meant that a certain trick Gaiman plays with a character's name loses some of it's impact, but that's ok - I knew what was coming anyway.
...more

Hard to describe. Ancient mythology in modern American setting. Magical and violent.


Jan 16, 2009
pearl
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
magical-realism,
urban-fantasy

Apr 15, 2009
Bill
marked it as to-read

Jun 05, 2010
Joseph Michael Owens
marked it as to-read
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
science-fiction,
fantasy


Jan 14, 2015
Karigan
marked it as to-read


Dec 11, 2015
Juniper
marked it as to-read
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
literature,
to-acquire