Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer
>
Books:
2023-booker-longlist
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1787303462
| 9781787303461
| 1787303462
| 3.76
| 5,584
| Apr 20, 2023
| Apr 20, 2023
|
it was ok
|
#13 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favouri #13 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Perhaps she loved the mystery of them all. He feels strongly that Mirzakhani's was a planet, most likely earth. I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize, although I was familiar with the author (a sometime slam poet (*) from her debut novel “As You Were� � which used a hospital ward setting and a fusion of different and innovative literary styles to both tell an emotional story of a woman keeping her terminal cancer secret, and to deliver a searing state-of-the nation indictment of Ireland going back to independence. (*) as an aside a I heard a pre-longlist rumour that an Irish slam poet had made the longlist and was rather proud of myself for correctly identifying the author and so having a Waterstones reservation placed the night before the announcement. But that was about as good as it got - while I enjoyed her debut, I have to say that this book was a big disappointment to me and the only one of the 13 that I struggled through on a re-read of the full longlist ahead of the shortlist announcement. Here rather than what a mash-up of styles and methods (although we do still have some switches of person) it feels like we have a mash up of several novels: I think there are several good novels within the characters used in this novel, but what we are reading is not one of them. The novel is set in the author’s native West Ireland and based in and around a Catholic boys school there. The main characters are: Jamie O’Neill, eleven years old but already hitting puberty seriously (at least physically) and about to start at the school. He lives with his father Eoin (a character who opens the book but then is oddly forgotten for large parts), is neurodiverse (with an obsession with, among others, the poems of Edgar Allan Poe, Fields Prize winning mathematicians � particularly Maryam Mirzakhani, the colour red) and obsessed with the idea of building a perpetual motion machine which he thinks will somehow bring him closer to his dead mother (an idea somehow linked in his mind to her competition-level swimming on the only video that exists of her). Tess Mahon � English and additional needs teacher (although the school is increasingly trying to discourage such pupils from applying) � she is married to Paul (yes another Booker Paul), their marriage though having largely settled into a pattern of carefully controlled conversation and counselling, not helped by their various failed attempts to have a child which has reached almost the large chance for IVF. Tadgh Foley � the new woodwork teacher at the school, having come over from “the Islands� and living now in a derelict property. And we move around between their viewpoints, sometimes � particularly for Jamie � in the first person. The other main character is the cartoonishly cliched anti-hero of the book � Faulks the headmaster/Father who runs the school, his ideas based around the teachings less of Jesus than Jordan Peterson (although this does not stop a rather tiresome anti-religious thread running through the novel � and not a particularly well-informed one with Faulks at one stage preaching on John the Baptist washing Jesus’s feet; a joke about the River Jordan would have been both biblically accurate and fitted the story). The Booker longlist seems strangely obsessed with dead parents: “Pearl� and “Western Lane� are fundamentally themed around the loss of a mother (the first when the main character was 8, the second just before the book starts); “All The Little Bird Hearts� has a neurodiverse narrator who lost both parents at age 16); “Old God’s Time� has a narrator dealing with the loss of his wife and what happened to her in an orphanage (and at one stage three characters discussing dead mothers). We not here only have Jamie (whose mother died when he was born), but Tess’s mother died when she was a toddler (turning her father into a street living drunkard), Tadgh’s stepfather died when he was 17 with his lack of knowledge of his own father also negatively impactful. All of this makes for some complex character interactions between the three - all seeking or gaining something intangible from each other but all in turn not confident in their reliability as a source. The book started well � a prologue and first chapter that introduces Jamie and Eoin, then a first chapter which brings us Tess and Paul. I was critical of another Booker longlisted book for some rather clunky prose where the same food noun is repeated multiple times in a short period � and there is an early scene where the same happens as Tess makes eggs, except here her repeating of the word eggs is cleverly deliberate and linked to her concerns over her infertility. But from then on I felt it its lost its way. The plot set up of the novel is that Jamie, both bullied at school and being far from the type of pupil Faulks wants to attract, is taken under the wing of Tess and Tadgh. That in turn draws the two of them together (with Tess deciding to walk out on Paul - whose behaviour also be comes increasingly cartoonish - when she realises she no longer wants to have his child even if the fertility treatment were to work). For reasons as unclear to Jamie as they are to the reader, Tadgh decides to help Jamie build a small boat in lieu of a perpetual motion machine. Jamie who has already (and rather bravely on the author’s behalf) described his life as “the plot of a bad book� comments on the boat I should have continued to invent something alone, a boat is not an invention of any kind, really, if you think about it, and no matter how many times Mr Foley has tried to convince me it is, I remain unconvinced. I am also annoyed at my lack of originality, and this one that we are to create the back on today (as opposed to break the back) seems ancient, which is definitely not an invention. And this captures two fundamental issues with the novel. Firstly the voice of Jamie is simply not an original one and sadly suffers by direct comparison to another longlisted book “All The Little Bird Hearts� which for all its eventual lack of direction, has a really original - rather than by now cliched - take on an neuro-diverse voice and way of seeing the world. And I have to say as someone who has met a few young mathematical experts not even a credible one. Secondly I remained unconvinced on the titular boat idea which as commented above seems not to really fit Jamie’s quest, leads to a lot of rather uninteresting description, and culminates in a cliched conclusion when a collection of characters pull together to complete the boat � including even a long overdue reappearance of Eoin. This may have worked better for me if I did not find both Jamie and Tess unsympathetic characters. The book’s epilogue is strong though and showcases the poetic talent of the author which endeared me to her debut. But that glimpse was all too short and rare - and felt like a life belt thrown out too long after the boat had already sank. Early on we read: At which time, the bottom bunk of Jamie's bed, once considered for sleepovers, was relegated / elevated for Jamie's Books of Great Importance. The books were left in piles along the bare mattress like tortoises with meticulous handwritten notes pressed on their immaculate covers: My Star Rating too is harsh (albeit rounded up) � but my Initial Reaction was not positive and this did not change on a re-read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 07, 2023
Aug 09, 2023
|
Sep 07, 2023
Aug 10, 2023
|
Aug 11, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0861546458
| 9780861546459
| 0861546458
| 4.05
| 68,291
| Aug 24, 2023
| Aug 24, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
Deserved winner of the 2023 Booker Prize #1 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what Deserved winner of the 2023 Booker Prize #1 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here A deeply-impactful, doom laden descent into dystopian darkness for Dublin. A sudden, swooping look from her father. Tell me, he says, do you believe in reality? Dad, what is that supposed to mean? It is a simple question, you took the degree, you understand what it means. When you put it like that, yes, I know what you mean, but spare me the lecture. He looks away momentarily towards the sideboard stacked high with yellowing newspapers, dog-eared current affairs magazines, the old smile pulling to reveal his teeth. We are both scientists, Eilish, we belong to a tradition but tradition is nothing more than what everyone can agree on - the scientists, the teachers, the institutions, if you change ownership of the institutions then you can change ownership of the facts, you can alter the structure of belief, what is agreed upon, that is what they are doing, Eilish, it is really quite simple, the NAP is trying to change what you and I call reality, they want to muddy it like water, if you say one thing is another thing and you say it enough times, then it must be so, and if you keep saying it over and over people accept it as true - this is an old idea, of course, it really is nothing new, but you're watching it happen in your own time and not in a book. I read this book due to its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize � and it was clearly for me the strongest of the six books I had not read prior to the longlist announcement and on a re-read of all 13 titles it is top of my personal longlist. The author has spoken of reading Herman Hesse and his prophetic 1927 novel “Steppenwolf� which “prophesied the great destruction coming to Europe� and wondered what it was like to live in such times in contrast to the 1990 “end of history� in which he was then living � but then coming to his novel in late 2018 �. “Brexit, Trump, and the forces gathering on the horizon: The Freedom Party in Austria. The National Front in France. The People’s Party in Denmark. Golden Dawn in Greece. Jobbik in Hungary. Law and Justice in Poland. Party for Freedom in the Netherlands. A tectonic shift was occurring in western democracies. I thought, too, about the implosion of Syria and the west’s largely indifferent response to its refugee crisis. The citizen’s regret is the novelist’s calling. I wanted to understand where all this might lead.� And the two epigraphs also draw these links from now to the past as well as giving both words of the book’s title with: Ecclesiastes The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be and that which is done is that which shall be done, and there is no new thing under the sun Bertholt Brecht’s 1939 In the dark times will there also be singing? Yes, there will also be singing. About the dark times. The story is a near future dystopic Ireland where a new nationalist party � the National Alliance Party (NAP) has swept to power, enacting a series of authoritarian measures under a Emergency Powers Act, including the suspension of many civil liberties under the auspices of the Garda National Service Bureau (GNSB). (just as a quick aside � if those three letter acronyms (TLA) make you think this will be something of an Atwood style dystopia, then think again. There was much speculation last year as to if Cormac McCarthy’s two novels might make the longlist, and after his death if Gaby Wood would use her discretion to allow his eligibility: but the judges have instead and far more appropriately I think picked an author writing a book which in its darkly poetic prose is a worth heir to McCarthy at his “The Road� finest). The close and intense third party point of view character of the book is Eilish Stack � Dublin living biological scientist and mother of four (in descending order of age - Mark, Molly, Bailey and then the infant Ben). The book opens with two GNSB secret policemen visiting the house wanting to question her husband Larry � a senior member of the teacher’s union, whose role in planning, previously entirely legal industrial action, seems to have fallen foul of the government/party’s new decrees. When Larry disappears into custody and the country is convulsed by more and more illiberal measures, prompting a civil war (into which Mark is drawn) � Eilish has to support both her children and her dementia affected, recently widowed (yes in 2023 Booker tradition Eilish too has recently lost her mother) father. A key part of the book is Eilish’s resistance to abandoning Ireland despite the urging of her father (in his lucid moments � while his non-lucid moments are a key reason as to why she will not leave together with the unknown fate of Larry), her children (particularly Molly) and her Canada based sister who in something of a theme for the book tells her “history is a silent record of people who did not know when to leave�. Another key theme is how an individual, particularly one such as Eilish whose very profession makes her inclined towards rules and laws and a search for truth, can cope when the very institutions which should be setting those laws and instead systematically disassembling the written and unwritten conventions on which civil society has previously been built. What really makes the book for me is its wonderfully atmospheric writing � weather, dreams, thoughts, the rapidly deteriorating national and local situation all reinforce each other so that the reader almost viscerally experiences a sense of foreboding, threat and despair. On one level I was reminded of Helen Dunmore’s brilliant “The Siege� as one of the few books which gave such an immersive experience of an individual trying to survive when society is disintegrating around them; although the temporal and geographical proximity of the setting of this book gives it a greater power. And further the writing here is more poetic, with sometimes spooling sentences. For example The window whispering the rain. She comes to be languid with the sense of being before memory, a hollow body filling with the sound of the rain until memory awakens and she is at spill, moving across the landing to see into the boys' room and Mark's empty bed. I found myself drawn in from the very first page and while I felt a propulsion to read the book quickly (which came from my desire to complete the Booker longlist) I found myself conflicted as wanting to re-read pages as the denseness of the prose is such as to at times both require and reward a second read (which in itself must bode well for its chances with the judges between longlist and shortlist). And I have to say that the second reading indeed proved if anything more compelling. Highly recommended and a book I think would make a really worthy Booker winner (possibly the only one in the list). she looks at her infant son, this child who remains an innocent and she sees how she has fallen afoul of herself and grows aghast, seeing that out of terror comes pity and out of pity comes love and out of love the world can be redeemed again, and she can see that the world does not end, that it is vanity to think the world will end during your lifetime in some sudden event, that what ends is your life and only your life, that what is sung by the prophets is but the same song sung across time, the coming of the sword, the world devoured by fire, the sun gone down into the earth at noon and the world cast in darkness, the fury of some god incarnate in the mouth of the prophet raging at the wickedness that will be cast out of sight, and the prophet sings not of the end of the world but of what has been done and what will be done and what is being done to some but not others, that the world is always ending over and over again in one place but not another and that the end of the world is always a local event, it comes to your country and visits your town and knocks on the door of your house and becomes to others but some distant warning, a brief report on the news, an echo of events that has passed into folklore,...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 2023
Aug 10, 2023
|
Sep 03, 2023
Aug 12, 2023
|
Aug 10, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1472288009
| 9781472288004
| 1472288009
| 3.77
| 4,670
| Mar 02, 2023
| Mar 02, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Winner of the Author’s Club Best First Novel Award # 8 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram p Winner of the Author’s Club Best First Novel Award # 8 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Of course, now I know Vita's little bird-heart, I remember those one-sided conversations differently. I see that my frequent muteness was a convenience to someone who was soft-feathered and sharp-eyed. And who sang away to herself in my presence, happily and without interruption, for she knew I had no song with which to call back. Birds have traditionally been banned from Italian households, whether as pets, paintings or ornaments. They are believed to bring the Evil Eye, the malocchio curse with them. I faithfully observe every Italian custom I have ever learned: cook seven fishes on Christmas Eve and lentils on 1 January; eat rice and no flour on St Lucia's Day; take chrysanthemums to my sister's grave on the Day of the Dead, and know it is seventeen and not thirteen that is unlucky. I would not have knowingly allowed even the image of a bird into my home, however beautiful. But I lived for and loved a bird-heart that summer; I only knew it afterwards. I read (and then re-read) this book due to its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize. The book’s origins are very interesting and integral to the authenticity of the reading experience in my view. The author is autistic and left school without qualifications having been unable to take GCSEs. Later as a parent to both neurotypical and atypical children � and as they were about to start school, and determined to show autism should not be a barrier to achievement, she decided to study herself � taking a first degree and master at the Open University before following with a PhD, the subject of which changed from Italian Literature (the author has said in a 2022 Granta article that “an intense proccupation with a singular topic is a common autistic characteristic� and that her latest was “Local Identity and Geographical Resettlement Patterns of the First Italian Diaspora� � part of a near lifelong fascination with Southern Italy) to the Contemporary Novel. I believe her topic may have been around the treatment of neurodiversity in novels and the way it is commonly viewed through neurotypical eyes (either of the narrator, other characters or both) This book (or at least a draft of it) was a key part of her thesis � and in it we are placed very much in the mind of its autistic first party narrator � Sunday � and see the world through her eyes; and her thought processes and the way she parses the behaviour of others are what gives the book its distinctive edge. Sunday lives in the Lake District � in a Victorian house which she inherited from her parents (who we quickly work out died when she was around 16, and one year after her older sister Dolores’s death from dry drowning the night after a difficult swim in the nearby Lake). She lives alone with her 16 year old daughter Dolly � having been divorced by Dolly’s father who Summer nicknames The King and who is the beloved and charismatic son of a local farming and farm shop family the Forresters. Dolly, for many years close to her mother and her fears and routines (for example a fixation with white food and fizzy drinks, a strong level of discomfort with the unknown or unfamiliar, the use and frequent reference to a 1950s Etiquette Guide for Ladies to inform and direct her social interactions, and the ability to quote appropriate Sicilian proverbs and folk tales for almost every situation) � is increasingly finding them restrictive and resent-worthy. The story, which is set over the Summer after Dolly takes her GCSEs, starts with a previously London based, upper middle class and childless couple � Vita and Rollo (an architect with eyes on redeveloping the local children’s home into a house of apartments) � let the next door house. Vita is unconventional � and while her eccentricities and failure to observe social conventions are rooted in entitled self confidence, rather than neurodiversity, her ability to delight in Summer’s own eccentricities is a breath of fresh air for the latter after a lifetime of feeling judged for them (including for all her childhood by her cold and distant mother, and more recently she sense by Dolly) and so the two strike up a potentially symbiotic friendship � although what is initially unclear is the benefit for Vita. And very early on we as readers sense that Sunday, normally so wary of things she does not understand and on the look out for danger in situations that a neurotypical person is likely to find unalarming, has relaxed her vigilance when it comes to Vita and her motivations (and various remarks by Summer � who is narrating the story 3 years later � hint that was the case). And when, and particularly after the arrival of Rollo, it is Dolly with who the couple seem to strike an even closer friendship we, perhaps more quickly than the normally carefully observant Summer, sense a rather deliberate gravitational pull of the impressionable Dolly into their orbit and away from Sunday - as they involve her in their business plans, their London trips and she all but moves in with them. Much of the writing is excellent. I mentally highlighted only the second line “The day began as my days always did then, greeting a daughter for whom adolescence meant allowing me increasingly smaller glimpses of herself�; later when she describes a difficult and stalled birth “the adrenaline that had been blanketing me crept away from my bed to hold the hand of another woman, and the ache of my labouring immediately made itself known to my bones like hard blows� � and then there are other personification passages like this: My condition does not accompany me into the greenhouses but waits at the door. When I am alone or at work, he sleeps outside with his dark head low on his paws; he resents the lack of challenge in the greenhouse environment, where no one speaks in riddles or looks at me oddly. Here is a magical space without social context or burdens. But in the company of others, the animal is fixed to my side. He is a smiling partner whose iron hand on me looks like affection, yet functions as a reminder of who I really am. The wolf-husband's wiry whiskers graze my skin as he whispers into my ear, talk about Italy go on go on don't look at their eyes oh no don't they don't like it at all look at the floor, the wall and isn't that music loud Sunday and aren't those lights too, too bright . . . ? And as my opening and closing quotes show � the book’s titular theme is a complex one explored at intervals in the narrative. I think one of the really fresh ideas here � and which is also why the writing is so strong - is that too many books with an autistic narrator or character pick one whose heightened area of skill likes in the area of mathematics � which then makes them rather stilted, logical narrators � here I think we have a neurodivergent narrator who, like is clearly true of the author, excels in the area of language. I also liked Sunday’s work at the garden centre of her in-laws, the way she finds peace with the plants and soil and the deep friendship she forms with a deaf fellow gardener � the author brilliant capturing the nuances of their signing to each other in the same way that Sunday herself is a natural at parsing the speech patterns, accents and emphases of others (which we especially see in her forensic parsing of Vita) Where perhaps the book is less strong is where the narrative goes after the initial set up. A large part of the book can seem a little repetitive: Sunday and Dolly go next door on Friday for dinner which is bought by Rollo from Harrod’s Food Hall and prepared in the house; Dolly and Vita grow increasingly close in shared laughter, speech, dress and emotions; Sunday drinks champagne and mainly eats bread rolls; Rollo announces a way to get Dolly more involved in his business to Sunday’s disquiet � although set against her happiness at her seeming unconditional acceptance by Vita; Dolly moves even more to be part of Rollo and Vita’s household ……� rinse and repeat. And the sense of jeopardy the narrative is creating about where things will end up (however oblivious Sunday is) is, leaves the book’s actual resolution seeming slightly anticlimactic which I don’t think was something the author was intending. But overall I found this a more engrossing book than I had expected from the blurb � and the judges are to be commended for picking out a different and underrepresented voice, even if this would not make my own longlist from eligible books (or shortlist from the judges� longlist). Her mouth speaks of that which fills her heart,' my mother used to warn us. This line had been a family dinner favourite with her during my silent periods. For Ma, such quietness evidenced that my heart was empty, while within the bosom of my talkative sister beat an organ full of filial love. And perhaps this is what Ma intuited when she spoke of my empty heart, that there was no place for her within it. She did not know I would have a little daughter with a tendency to fall unexpectedly and sweetly asleep, at my breast, at mealtimes and during conversations or games, as if in sudden collapse. A child who could fall asleep even while opening presents; her snoring gently blowing the ripped paper up and down beside her face. Dolly's habitual surrender to sleep was what broke something hard within me, this damage to my heart that I never want fixed. These daily infant acts of faith rushed like water into the empty heart my mother assigned me. She, herself, knew all about housing vacant chambers where love should be. Even my father knew that my mother's heart contained only lake-water, running cold and lonely inside her. His was a different kind of bird-heart; it was full and loving, but available solely to his wife....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 11, 2023
Aug 08, 2023
|
Sep 12, 2023
Aug 09, 2023
|
Aug 08, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
000850122X
| 9780008501228
| 000850122X
| 3.68
| 12,683
| Sep 06, 2022
| Sep 06, 2022
|
really liked it
|
Shortlisted for the 2024 Dublin Literary Prize Previously shortlisted for the Gordon Burn Prize and the 2023 Booker Prize. #10 in my Booker Prize longl Shortlisted for the 2024 Dublin Literary Prize Previously shortlisted for the Gordon Burn Prize and the 2023 Booker Prize. #10 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: It begins with ‘What are you?� hollered from the perimeter of your front yard when you're nine younger, probably. You'll be asked again throughout junior high and high school, then out in the world, in strip clubs, in food courts, over the phone, and at various menial jobs. The askers are expectant. They demand immediate gratification. Their question lifts you slightly off your preadolescent toes, tilting you, not just because you don't understand it, but because even if you did understand this question, you wouldn't yet have an answer.. You read this book due to its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize, although you recall it was previously longlisted for the 2022 (US) National Book Award for fiction. Let’s start by discussing the book’s eligibility for the prize. The Booker rules are designed to exclude pure collections of unliked short stories. The prize rules starts by defining it as for “long-form fiction�, and this is by explicit contrast with the International Booker which adds “or collection of short stories�. This is further clarified by a rule in the main Booker eligibility rules saying that books need to be “unified and substantial�. Although this book is a short story collection, the stories are very linked - in fact (with one exception) effectively proceeding chronologically with the same characters, even if they switch voice and viewpoint (and are written to be more obviously capable of being read standalone). In my view there is no question as to the book’s eligibility - in contrast to the 2016 shortlist “All That Man Is� by David Szalay where the story links were more the exception than the rule. The first story � “In Flux� - is I think the book’s highlight and introduce as the book’s main protagonist Trelawny, youngest son of Topper and Sanya (their older son is Delano) who feel Jamaica for the USA at their parent’s urging in the late 1970s after the political/gang violence which engulfed the island. Trelawny, unlike Delano, is born in the USA and “Flux� tells the story of his struggle for an identity on a host of dimensions - tribal, national, familial and particularly racial, always seemingly excluded as something of an “other�. The story is told in the second person, and this is a really effective way to convey the way in which he is always trying to see himself via how others see him. The second story “Under the Ackee Tree� gives us Topper’s story (much of which we have already picked up as seen through Trelawny’s experience) - beginning with when he left Jamaica, his guilt when 1988 Hurricane Gilbert wrecked the Island and determination thereafter to instil Jamaican culture in his two boys, the way in which the post 1992 Hurricane Andrew demand surge gave faltering construction business a boost but his faltering marriage a blow, and finishing with his gradual inability to identify with his Americanised, college studying younger son over Delano (with his tree surgeon business) and which culminates in name calling from him, and a drastic action from Trelawny, which cause a lasting breech. This story is written in the second person and also in a sometimes-heavy Patois - I think the second of those (and we already know that even Trelawny finds his father hard to follow) works well but would have been better without the need to repeat the use of the second person (which seems inappropriate here - Topper to me someone who is very self-absorbed). The book - which until now could have been seen as just the start of an alternating point of view novel - then does move to more of a collected short story vibe. “Independent Living� (the sixth story) follows in the track of “Odd Jobs� (the third) both describing various hand to mouth employment gigs that Trelawny takes in the face of the post financial crisis downturn and his own estrangement from any family support - one a rather satirical story about a subsidised housing scheme for the elderly where his main aim is to maximise income, the other for me a very ill judged story about a woman who pays her to hit him (the collection would be undoubtedly stronger without this story, however satirical its intent). I must admit on a second read “Odd Jobs� felt such a poor choice that I rounded my overall ranking down. Our sense from these stories is that Delano, married and a father, is prospering while Trelawny struggles - living in the old family house but the rather extravagantly titled “If He’d Suspected He’d Get Someone Killed This Morning, Delano Would Never Leave His Couch� (seventh story) continues in the humorous disaster job theme but with the older brother: Delano, perhaps remembering his father’s Andrew breakthrough, hatches a scheme with his partner to rescue his arboreal business by taking advantage of the incoming 2011 Hurricane Irene (one therefore of three (*) historical Hurricanes to feature as crucial events in this novel - another Booker longlisted novel “This Other Eden� begins with another one - the 1815 Great September Gale) but has to start by getting back their apple picker from the repairman who has impounded it for non-payment. (Purely as an aside - in a longlist dominated by Irish books I smiled at a story involving three men and about tree-fellers …�.. I will get my coat) (*) a fourth 2005 Hurricane Katrina gets a passing mention also The most standalone story (and therefore the one perhaps closest to ruining the collection’s eligibility) is also one of the most accomplished “Splashdown�: the story of Trelawny and Delano’s cousin Cukie and his neglectful / estranged father Ox. To be honest the cousin link seemed rather forced but the story does pick up of much of what drives Trelawny’s story also - a failed father figure and the ongoing implications of that for a son, including testing whether in extremis the father will come to the rescue. As an aside this is interesting on a longlist which features the long-term impacts of a loss of a mother on daughters in a number of novels. “Pestilence� (fourth story) is a very short and for me family forgettable story - part about various animal infestations and part about Hurricane Andrew - it does however usefully major on one of the three insecurities which run through and I think are key to the novel (identity insecurity, economic insecurity and here environmental insecurity) as well as showing some of the tension even early on between the two brothers about the right to inherit the family property. And this is a setup for the book’s final and titular story - where both brother’s fight for their father’s inheritance and support in face of relative indifference to either. Like “Odd Jobs� there is another misjudged storyline involving a woman paying Trelawny for a distasteful purpose, but this is a relatively small element of this otherwise strong ending. And again, we are back in the second person and this time, like with the opening novel a really effective use - this time to signify rather cleverly someone looking back and addressing their younger self. So in a year after a second person story one the Booker Prize, this longlist has two books which use it for part of their telling (“Bee Sting�) being the other one. As I have implied above the use in both the first and last stories is appropriate and strong � so I can say that I Survive[d the use of] You. Overall, you feel that this is not the worst book on a weak longlist, even if you do not particularly wish to see it in the shortlist. The tequila courses through you, making you feel as though you are simultaneously on Morgan's couch and diffused across the universe, on an infinite trajectory away from your troubles. In this state of multiplicity you see clearly enough what will happen, though once the vision passes, you will forget too quickly and completely to prevent it from occurring .........…………But for now, you are on Morgan's couch, listening to the salt grinding between granite and glass, a moment away from losing this premonition, this portal to your future, now my past. Tell him across the expanse of time and distance, as I am telling you now, all that I can't say to him. Start with the resentment and the feelings of neglect and your resulting recklessness. Recount every injury, every scar you carved into each other. And when you're finished, and you are certain your father has heard, do what might divert you from the path to self-destruction: forgive yourselves. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 06, 2023
Aug 05, 2023
|
Sep 06, 2023
Aug 06, 2023
|
Aug 06, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1039004032
| 9781039004030
| 1039004032
| 3.49
| 9,779
| Feb 07, 2023
| Feb 07, 2023
|
liked it
|
Now longlisted for the 2024 Women’s Prize Previously shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize #12 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all t Now longlisted for the 2024 Women’s Prize Previously shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize #12 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Grieving, gaps and Jains in this tale of Gopi, Ged and Jahangir � longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize. I knew from his silence that he wasn't going to move first, and all I could do was serve and volley or disappoint him. The smudges on the wall blurred one into the other and I thought that surely I would fall. That was when it started up. A steady, melancholy rhythm from the other court, the shot and its echo, over and over again, like some sort of deliverance. I could tell it was one person conducting a drill. And I knew who it was. I stood there, listening, and the sound poured into me, into my nerves and bones, and it was with a feeling of having been rescued that I raised my racket and served. The debut novel is told in a retrospective first party by a narrator (looking back, probably around twenty years) to when they were a child growing up in a family in Luton in the late eighties. At the start of the time on which they look back, they (Gopi) are eleven, with two sisters Khush (13) and Mona (15) and, with their electrician father � who they know as Pa � have just lost their mother. The family are Jains, part of a Gujrati community although the family (other than when they spoke to their late mother) converse in English. The key narrative tension at the start of the novel is when the girl’s Edinburgh based Auntie Ranjan (whose marriage to Pa’s younger brother Uncle Pavan is childless) criticises Pa shortly after the mother’s funeral for the girls being wild � and further she and Pavan suggest that they should take one of the girls and bring her up as their own. Pa’s reaction to this and some nostalgic discussions with his brother about their own childhood, is to seriously rachet up the girl’s squash playing (at the eponymous sports club) to a high level of competitiveness including obsessive levels of practice and late night sessions watching videos of Jahangir Khan � to which only Gopi really responds. There Gopi forms a near romantic relationship (albeit one mainly played out through squash matches given their young ages) with Ged � the white son of the bar manager, while Pa and the bar manager seem drawn to each other. The key narrative tension (although the lack of real jeopardy rather drained the tension for me) at the end of the novel (and after Gopi goes to live in Edinburgh) is a squash tournament just outside Durham which brings everyone back together. And the family all process their grief differently: Mona taking on a pseudo-mother role and also disapproving of Pa’s friendship with Ged’s mother (less due to race than due to the apparent displacement of their mother’s memory); Mona staying up late at night seemingly talking to her mother; Gopi on the squash court via obsessive training and through striking the ball as well as in one case an opponent; and her father (as well as with his squash obsession and devotion to her training) in long withdrawn silences and neglect of his job. And this gets to the gap issue � much of what takes place between the family takes place in gestures, silences, observed actions � and that is the only way each member really understands when how the others are grieving. And this extends to the novel itself which is also one of gaps � taking my paragraph above describing the “debut novel�, neither the retrospective nature of the narrative, the location or the time are explicitly alluded to, although all are clear from close observation. And similarly in a novel which centres on grieving but in an immigrant family - the immigrant experience, the racism the girls experience at school and the family in their community, the prejudices of the Gujarati community are all deliberately alluded to largely by observation and omission or (and this rather stands out from the rest of the novel) by displacement - an almost feral dog, who the girls christen “Fourth Avenue� for the direction from which he roams, encapsulating their wariness of the wider community and their desire to avoid its gaze. The author drew heavily her preparation for the book on the Lorrie Moore edited “Faber Book of Contemporary Stories About Childhood�, and she said that in the introduction Moore quoted Gail Godwin as saying “Behind every story that begins ‘when I was a child� there exists another story on which adults are fighting for their lives� � which she (Maroo) chose to interpret as both the adults at the time the narrator was a child (here of course Pa, but also we understand over time Ranjan and Pavan with their own grief in their marriage) and as the adult the child becomes. And this gets to another gap as despite the author holding this idea closely as she wrote the novel, we do not know what the narrator has chosen now to tell the story. So this is a short novel dealing with profound emotions, where much takes place between the lines � and I was therefore reminded of (and have seen other comparisons to) Claire Keegan. And indeed Keegan’s own website features this testimonial “Claire Keegan deserves her reputation as a fine teacher of writing. In two days (Beginnings, Middles, Endings class in London) Claire’s insights, shared with clarity, humour and authority, changed the way I read and think about stories. I’ve also received Claire’s advice on two short manuscripts � in her feedback, she was direct and honest and got to the heart of things, breathing new life into my work� Chetna Maroo, London But I am not sure for me the book reached those (admittedly rarified) heights. With Keegan at her best it feels like every word has been carefully chiseled with no extraneous text - but here I did not have this feeling both at the micro and macro level. At the local level: early on there is a section where the extended family eat julabs and the word syrup recurs three times in only a few lines � and effect I found slightly jarring and only matched later in the book by no fewer than seven uses of puris in only two paragraphs. On a second read of the book this noun repeating narrative style was even more intrusive to my reading - some of it reflecting perhaps the family’s own obsessions: nine Jahangir’s in less than 150 words, Durham and Cleveland, the fort - but others more showing it’s a stylistic choice (for example coke and chaas) and not one that worked for me. And at a wider level: my biggest issue was that the squash sequences held next to no interest for me, but dominated the book - in particular the over lengthy ending at the squash tournament which for me was simultaneously drained of any real jeopardy and inevitable in its ending. Similarly I felt that some of the characters were too faintly outlined � some authors are brilliant at summoning up a person in only a few lines, but Khush and Mona never really crystallised as characters for me. Perhaps one way of summarising these is that the prose is not stunning but servicable and the characters could have been painted with bolder strokes � both of which make sense I guess for a book about learning to play squash. Given the glaring omissions from the longlist, the less known books will inevitable if unfairly be judged against similar books that were omitted � and the frequent references to Durham inevitably lead me to a Cuddy comparison. And even without that comparison I think this is a good book but not one that for me merits its place on the longlist, against which standard I have judged it. I do however think the author is talented and I will look forward to her next book and so rounded up to three stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 05, 2023
Aug 03, 2023
|
Sep 05, 2023
Aug 04, 2023
|
Aug 04, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1911648527
| 9781911648529
| 1911648527
| 3.86
| 5,364
| 2023
| Sep 19, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Now shortlisted for the Authors� Club Best First Novel Award. #5 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My In Now shortlisted for the Authors� Club Best First Novel Award. #5 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: � I thought my child would heal my broken heart. I didn't stop to ask if this was asking too much of her. I didn't stop to think about what was passed on in my milk, the hurt, the loss, the anxiety. I remember feeding her, looking around for my own mother, crying as I hadn't for years, the tears falling on my baby's head, and I never thought those tears would leave a trace. I thought they would disappear as easily as I brushed them away with my hand. I read (and then re-read) this book due to its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize. It is published by the UK small press Indigo Press who “publish books to make readers see the world afresh, question their behaviour and beliefs, and imagine a better future�. As an aside I realised that this is the third book I have read by the press � all of a very high standard � the previous two being the distinctive and vital Desmond Elliott Prize longlisted “Lessons In Love and Other Crimes� by Elizabeth Chakrabarty and “Riambel� by the Mauritian Priya Hein which was frequently mentioned in Booker speculation. It is the debut novel of the author Siân Hughes � whose first poetry collection “The Missing� ( published by Cromer based Salt in 2009) was also award nominated. Its origins lie in three main inspirations: a rambling house from her childhood village (which she revisited after her mother’s death); the author’s own struggles with post-partum psychosis; and the titular medieval poem: () which survives in the modern day in the same manuscript as “Gaiwan and the Green Knight� (which itself is important to the novel). The story is narrated in first person by Marianne � now herself a single mother of a daughter Susannah but still trying to come to terms with the death of her free-spirited mother when the narrator was 8 and her younger brother Joe still a baby � the mother having seemingly walked out and drowned in a nearby river, leaving their father Edward to bring them up � initially in their ramshackle house (with its green garden) in a small Cheshire village until the family’s economic circumstances force them to move to a newer house in the University town where Edward works . Each chapter of the novel starts with a childhood rhyme or folk song with typically a gruesome ending � for example one of the most familiar will be the oranges and lemons ending Here comes a candle Of these the author has said in an interview At the start of the poem [Pearl] the grieving parent goes to the garden, or grave, and hears beautiful music in the silence there. The herbs and flowers planted there smell sweet, and his mind is filled with music. I always thought the songs he heard at that moment were really important, and in my mind the herb garden and the songs went together. But when I translated that section I found the mention of songs was fleeting � barely a line! The songs at the start of the sections and the references to the folk songs the mother passes on and especially those songs concerning burial rituals, are all in the book because of this tiny part of the poem. In terms of structure I wanted to create sections in the novel that would work something like the sections of the poem, with the songs as the link words, or clips that hold the pearls together in a rosary-like sequence. That is why, in the final section there is a reference to a key song from the opening, so it ties together. Well, I hope it ties together On a second read I really appreciated how the rhymes/songs, the chapter titles and the chapter contents held together so well to create what is a very episodic structure with each chapter itself a self contained vignette (either assembling the book’s theme or helping build its narrative). . Just as one example the song above I realised is from what for me was the best written chapter of the novel - Exit Sign - with its powerful treatment of flight (including suicidal) impulses. The chapters themselves range back over Marianne’s life, but the driving impulse is always her sense to make sense of and understand her mother’s actions. We see her: as a child � largely lovingly if eccentrically homeschooled by her mother; post her mother’s death � having issues with school attendance, eating and with self-harming; in her late school years engaging in an affair with an 18 year old daughter of one of Edward’s colleagues � an affair seemingly engineered by the older girl as revenge � for some unknown cause - on Edward and which culminates in a disastrous visit to Marianne’s old family house which uncovers a secret her father has withheld from her about her mother; as a mother of a young child � suffering from post-partum psychosis and starting to feel a connection with what may have driven her mother’s choice; a second visit to her childhood home and a new revelation and more of a sense of closure about what happened to her mother � and much more besides � at all times though with her mother’s presence almost tangible to her “Sometimes I think I have lived my life as an observer, saving all the best bits for her by looking very carefully and trying to remember the details she would have liked.� Note that the quote above captures a meta fictional aspect to the novel. Marianne as an art student makes her a final submission a series of miniature tableaux aiming to capture the story of the poem Pearl, which has so many links to her past (the unreachable mourned woman, the garden and grave, a stream crossing) and which implicitly she feels holds the key to unlock the secrets to her mother’s actions. We are told she had imagined it as a perfect circle, a string of beads with tiny clues linking each to the next like neat clips holding together the links in a string of rosary beads. but the sequencing is lost and the individual tableaux get obscured under layers of pain and pasted poetry in a way which links, cleverly I think, to both the author’s own design for the novel and the way Marianne’s attempts to uncover both memories of and the motivation for her mother are obscured by time and life events. I even liked the way the scraps of remembered poems and rhymes in the chapters match the charity shop construction of Marianne’s scenes. Later the narrator realised that perhaps even her choice of poem has been wrong all along. The pacing and tone of the book is interesting � at times it can feel rather slow/meandering and slightly fey � not least due to her mother’s character as well as the folk songs Was my mother a practising pagan? I don't think so. She sang old songs. She talked to every living thing. To the tree before she broke its branches. To the roots hanging into the cave. To single magpies, obviously. Doesn't everyone? To the little people. If she lost her favourite trowel in the garden again she would say, 'Now where have you little menaces moved that trowel of mine?' But the book does have a narrative impulse � just one tangled up in the memories cascading into the narrator’s brain. And just like the songs themselves there is a darker side to the writing. I was strongly reminded of the writing of Daisy Johnson and its combination of liminality, leaving and legend of “Everything Under�, but with an even harder edge � with its coverage of PPD, cutting and suicidal impulses. In terms of highlights - there are many. Forced to choose another one to the Exit Sign chapter, one with a more narrative theme, I would pick her second visit to her childhood home and a beautifully judged scene where the house’s latest owners and Marianne talk past each other, neither supplying the other’s needs although an incidental closing gesture proves consequential. If I had to pick a less successful element I was left slightly uncomfortable with a scene where Marianne visits a Traveller’s site to get a puppy as many of the elements of the family she encounters while positively portrayed (Marianne’s initial judgmental attitude is called out immediately) still seemed cliched. I would be more comfortable if I knew if the author’s links to that community. A link within the story - to a “raggle taggle gypsies-oh� song she liked to act out as a child seemed to make things worse but I would stress the writing is never less than empathetic. Overall though I found this an interesting and quiet but striking novel. Given the glaring omissions from the longlist, the less known books will inevitably if unfairly judged against similar books that were omitted. Interestingly the pre-prize speculation included a number of books on the difficulties of being a new mother. While this does not teach the heights of the best of those, Claire Kikroy’s “Soldier, Sailor� it seems a worthwhile addition to the longlist and one which makes the second half my personal shortlist. There's an exercise the therapists make you do. Where you are allowed to blame everyone. I have played that game, or tried to. Who do I blame for my mother's disappearance? My mother, first off. My father, for not knowing she might. For being at work. Mrs Wynne, for not seeing her set off. Myself, for looking at some cut-out dolls instead of watching her every move. Joe, for staying asleep all afternoon. Her midwife, for not fighting her way down our muddy lane to fill in the questionnaire to assess post-natal depression risk. If such a thing existed at the time. The GP she had seen three days before to weigh Joe, who noticed nothing out of the ordinary. My brother Jonathan, for not drawing breath....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Sep 08, 2023
Aug 2023
|
Sep 09, 2023
Aug 03, 2023
|
Aug 01, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0241353955
| 9780241353950
| 0241353955
| 3.90
| 101,007
| Jun 08, 2023
| Jun 08, 2023
|
liked it
|
Winner of the inaugural Sky Arts Awards Literature category Winner of the inaugural Nero Gold Award - Book of the Year 2023 Winner of the inaugural Ner Winner of the inaugural Sky Arts Awards Literature category Winner of the inaugural Nero Gold Award - Book of the Year 2023 Winner of the inaugural Nero Book Awards Fiction category as I predicted pre shortlist Winner of the Irish Book of The Year Award Shortlisted for the 2024 Writers Prize. Shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize #11 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize - I originally read this around two weeks ahead of the longlist announcement as it has been included in some Booker speculation - of the nearly 80 eligible books I pre-read I ranked this below 60th. Having said that, and after re-reading it, I do think it’s a very possible winner -it’s certainly an early Bookstagram favourite - and in terms of the popularity of the prize a far from unreasonable winner. It strikes me, of all the longlist books, as the one readers might most readily press into someone else’s hand and say “you must read this� � although that was really the historic criteria of the Costa Prize for which I think this would have been a better fit, and this therefore may well be a strong contender for the inaugural Nero Prize. On literary merit though - I don’t think it’s Finest Fiction, which should be the Booker criteria. On a second read I found the Imelda section a little disappointing. It really did not I think fully capture her supposed scattergun non-sequitur filled way of talking that Cass describes. And it is definitely where the book gains in size (it’s a very lengthy section) what it loses in focus. For all the exhaustive dissection of Imelda’s life - most of it supposedly occurring in flashback around the time of a Lion’s Dinner honouring Maurice which takes place in the same venue as her wedding to Dickie, many of the key elements of that day are withheld until a later section. I did appreciate though the way in which Mike appeals to Imelda via a shared experience of extreme childhood poverty, and the Cass/Elaine dynamics remain strong. And the folktale of the man who parties with the fairies only to find on returning to the world that 100 years have past and all he loved - one I slightly struggled with first time as it applied to character’s individual lives - worked best second time for me when I interpreted it as a metaphor for the Celtic Tiger years in Ireland and for Western consumerism/late capitalism and climate change (the latter subject which is also cleverly linked to the Magdalene Laundries). But it’s the ending that still does not work for me, when viewed through a literary/finest fiction lens. Not the final scenes (although that is rather too clunkily signposted from the first line of the book) but the pages leading up to it where there are too many coincidences (just a couple of examples but Cass while in Dublin attends a talk by Willie where he talks - unknown to her - about her father, and a few pages later is unknowingly next to Ethan in a shop), too many last minute interventions and far too many of the characters converging in the last pages including some long thought lost. We need to take off our masks �. And that's hard, after a lifetime of hiding away, it's existentially hard, take it from me. But once you do it, the world is transformed. Once you take off your mask, it's like all the other masks become transparent, and you can see that beneath our individual quirks and weirdnesses, we're he same. We are the same in being different, in feeling bad about being different. Or to put it another way, we are all different expressions of the same vulnerability and need. That's what binds us together. And once we recognize it, once we see ourselves as a community of difference, the differences themselves no longer define us. That's when we can start to work together and things can change. ORIGINAL JULY 2023 REVIEW A more than 600+ page family tale switching over a year (albeit with frequent flashbacks) or so between the viewpoints of four members of a nuclear Irish family, for whom the Irish financial crash had uncovered buried tensions and secrets of the past, and one which takes place against the emerging threat of climate change. Initially I found this an engrossing read, the author’s ability to cleverly capture the four different voices and the way in which we gained insight and different perspective over time impressive; the repeated imagery and stories intriguing; but the book took for me an unwelcome turn, rather overstayed its welcome (the amount of plot did not at justify in my view the book’s length which seemed more a product of lack of editing) and had an ending which was stylistically clever but for me ill-judged in a narrative sense. The family are father Dickie, his wife Imelda, his daughter Cass and son PJ. Dickie runs the family motor dealer business set up by his father Maurice (now semi-retired in Portugal). Dickie had a younger brother Frank, a renowned GAA participant (particularly at Gaelic football) who died when Dickie was at Trinity � we also learn that Frank was initially engaged to the Imelda � beautiful but from a poor background - and the sequence of events which lead to her then marrying Dickie shortly after (already pregnant with Cass) and Dickie then ending up back in the family business, as well as the ghost of other lives that may have occurred for both of them, lies heavily on their lives and across the novel. It has to be said that the idea of choices made � and the imagining of alternative future pathways becomes a little too common as the book goes on. At the start of the book � the business is failing badly in the second-third year of the economic downturn, Dickie seems powerless to run it around and Imelda (something of a consumerholic) despairs at having to start selling everything she has accumulated over the years. All this is seen through the voice of Cass � one of the brightest girls at her school and coming up to the Leavers Certificate she expects to win her a place at Dublin, but increasingly obsessed with Elaine � the beautiful but capricious daughter of the other local businessman Big Mike a cattle dealer turned property developer. We then change voice to PJ � who spends much of his time online chatting to a friend Ethan on a Game Board, his school days avoiding bullies � particularly one who claims Dickie owes his family money and that he will badly beat up PJ if he does not get the money - and the rest of his time worrying about his family situation � wearing too small shoes as he does not think they can afford new ones and oddly obsessed that his parents will get divorced and/or send him to boarding school. In both sections Murray’s ability to capture the voices and inhabit the character of a older teenage girl and a rather nerdy 12 year old boy is impressive � and there is a light undercurrent of humour despite the travails of the family and the personal anguish of the two children. Next up is Imelda, desperate for Dickie to ask Maurice for help. We learn via flashbacks much of her early life (in a desperately poor family with a violent ex bare knuckle fighter father - her only real ally her youngest brother Lar) and how she met Frank � whose sporting prowess charmed her father just as his poverty and violence rather repelled Maurice. This is in many ways a powerful section, and written in a rather breathless as well as unpunctuated style meant to capture both Imelda’s lack of formal education and her rather scattergun style of speaking/thinking. A number of media reviews have referred to this as a stream-of-consciousness style and invoked Molly Bloom but I think that is misleading and not intended by the author. The fourth voice is Dickie � and while the move to a rather conventional voice matches Dickie’s much remarked upon bookishness. I did not really feel the storyline worked � telling of Dickie’s move to Trinity to study, a friendship with an eccentric other student Willie (which becomes much deeper over time), the truth behind a traumatic incident when he was apparently struck by a bus on the first day of his third year (note that the book is rather too full of famous incidents which are not what they seem � the truth about the titular event which meant Imelda wore her veil for the entire wedding to cover her swollen eye emerges later on) and then a, for me, rather surprising relationship he forged when he returned. A fifth section of the book then adopts a stylistically impressive second person voice - and using it switches rapidly around each character as we learn more of the past and see how the present develops: Cass for example now at Trinity, Imelda deciding what to do about the attentions of Mike, Maurice who has returned from Portugal finding holes in the garage accounts, Dickie freed from the garage spending his time with Victor � an eccentric but driven end time prepper who drags Victor into his plans and helps transform a shed on Dickie’s family land (a shed which has different meanings to various of the novel’s characters). Other characters include a mysterious Polish mechanic who obsessed a number of the family members, Big Mike’s Brazilian housekeeper and sometime lover, Imelda’s ageing seer Aunt Rose (with who she lived for many years) � and at the end - in a sequence which transitions further to be written more like a play - a series of rather unlikely events (at the least in their simultaneity) and part misunderstandings causes pretty well every character to converge on the shed � in a section which I really felt was not a great way to end a literary fiction novel. Overall for me - as my initial comments said - a book which despite its considerable merit, just failed to either live up to its huge promise or really justify its length. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 31, 2023
Jul 16, 2023
|
Sep 2023
Jul 19, 2023
|
Jul 10, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1529152542
| 9781529152548
| 1529152542
| 3.77
| 19,439
| 2023
| Feb 09, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
Now shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize and 2023 US National Book Award for Fiction #2 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the lon Now shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize and 2023 US National Book Award for Fiction #2 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize. I first read this book in July - of the 80 or so eligible books I read it was the only one of my top 13 to make what was a rather underwhelming longlist (6 other books I had read made the list) - and perhaps not surprisingly was at the top of my provisional rankings after reading the full list. So, here is another arrival on our little island, Esther thought. Our little island on this little earth. This little earth, hung somewhere deep in the fathomless heavens. Here is another arrival this girl, this child-ripening within her own body the seed of another arrival, another child, each and every life comprehensive, each peculiar, each priceless, and each less than the shadow of a shadow, all cherished or despised, celebrated or aggrieved, memorialized or entirely forgotten. I re- read the book in late August and enjoyed it as much second time around particularly due to the many biblical references (Eden, Noah’s Ark, Pharoah, crossing of the Red Sea, the wilderness tears, Ruth, Babylonian exile, Jesus and so on). ORIGINAL JULY REVIEW Eha’s life and the lives of everyone on the island and everything they’ve done and enjoyed and suffered and nearly starved from and all the full moons and bright suns and green grass and blue skies and rain and snow and wind and clouds, tin cups, lead sinkers, cod and lobsters and clams and whelks and driftwood all begin to erupt in slow motion from the infinitely dense black point in Eha’s thought that is the meaning of this eviction, which at first his brain could not divulge to his understanding but is splitting open and disgorging as he sits looking at his house remembering so many things. Now he looks at his house and can feel Zachary’s sorrow, as if from inside, instead of just knowing that he’s a sad man from the outside, and can feel the comfort of his tree and as he understands that, looking at the house he and Zachary built together, that Zachary taught him how to make, he realizes not the fact but the meaning of the fact that this house before him, from which he and his mother and daughters are to be evicted and which once empty will be set afire and burn from home to square of ash, is made of the tree that he and Zachary felled on the main, deep in a part of the woods Zachary knew about from the old uncles and grandpas and Penobscots who lived by themselves away from any town or settlement. He realizes, too, that he was once a son missing a father but Zachary has been his real father all these years since, and he realizes that he now is a father missing a son. Paul Harding’s debut novel “Tinkers� about a dying New England clockmaker was published by a small independent press and something of a word-of-mouth hit before its surprise Pulitzer Prize win in 2010. His second novel “Enon� featured the grandson of that clockmaker, mourning the death of his pre-teenage daughter. This is his third novel and while character/location wise tangentially related to his first two (a “grand dame� - Ms Hale from ‘Enon� is a side character in this as an absent ten year old who later acts as a donator of drawings to retrospective art exhibitions, and a pivotal part of the novel occurs on the ‘Enon� estate) takes the themes of death and mourning and extends them from individuals to a small and distinctive community. It is also I think the novel that may bring him to greater UK attention with a potential Booker longlisting given the book is blurbed by one of the judges (Esi Eduygan) but one which would I believe be entirely merited. The book is inspired by the story of Malaga Island () � a very small Island in Maine which housed an eclectic interracial community and was subject to a forced deportation by the state authorities in 1911 on the grounds of “degeneracy� with some residents taken to institutions for the feeble-minded � an action for which the state issued a belated apology in 2011 � something bought to the attention of the public in Down East Magazine () in an article which Harding later read while also noting that the first International Eugenics Congress () was happening in London at almost the same time (1912). The story of the Island and that link provides the framework for what is an otherwise entirely fictionalised novel � Harding has said “I’m not the person to write the history of Malaga Island; I have no organic connection to it; I didn’t grow up there. Those people’s personal lives are not mine to take up.� � instead he uses it as an imaginative launch pad for exploring what the community of the Island might be like and how they may have experienced the State’s actions � “I think of my writing as interrogative, you just go in there, and you just listen and look and describe. The mode can never be explanatory. There’s no thesis. There’s no argument. It’s purely descriptive, just always asking, ‘What is it like, what is it like, what is it like?’� Harding’s Malaga equivalent is “Apple Island� � lying some 300 feet only from the mainland and named after the trees planted by (and an obsession for) its first settler � Benjamin Honey a free or fleed Bantu/Igbo origin slave who first moved to the Island with his Galway born wife Patience in 1793. And the book opens in 1911 with the Island matriarch � Esther Honey (Benjamin and Patience’s great-grandaughter) telling her own grandchildren (Ethan � 15, Charlotte � 10, Tabitha � 8: children of her � largely silent - son Eha, a talented carpenter) the Island’s own Noah/Flood based foundational story when the Island and the early Honey family was almost destroyed in a Hurricane enduced storm in 1815 (presumably the “Great September Gale� - ) � surviving only just by clinging onto the top trees of a branch as a wall of water and debris flooded over the land. Gradually we are introduced to the other members of the Island - a group with “blood from every continent but Antarctica� who live in a hand-to-mouth freedom, invested with lice but also free to roam their small Island at will. Theophilus and Candace Lark (“cousins probably siblings�) from a series of inbred generations whose four children (other than the younger sister Millie) are sun-sensitive, part blind and part deaf � the oldest Rabbit living off bark and sea creatures: they survive (just) by fishing which is largely carried out by Candace now with Theophilus wearing his mother’s dress, his grandmother’s apron and his storekeeper grandfather’s affectations (particularly the phrase “What lack ye� � when people pass). Violet and Iris McDermott � two elderly sisters who run a laundry for mainlanders clothes and who look after a group of three Penobscot tribe children abandoned into their care Zachary Hand to God Proverbs � a civil war veteran who lives in a hollow tree at the end of the Island � a tree inside which he (a brilliant carpenter who helped Eha fell and then build the wooden and shingled Honey family home) carves a series of increasingly elaborate biblical scenes. Zachary together with Esther is the effective elder on the Island and he also shares the knowledge of her own very troubled past with her father, a past which Esther sees as having bought something of a curse to the Island whose consequences are bound up in what is now happening Zachary is also something of an Old Testament prophet figure Wicked shepherds! Burn me at the stake and hang me from a tree. Clap me in the stocks; send me down the mine; set me in the burning fields. But I am queer. And I say, Here is water, bread, a dull penny. Here’re my old shirt, my plane and hammer, a roof I’ll help you raise above your head. Here is my queer old body, in a barn, behind a hedge, beneath a shadow, on a bare pallet—quick—while the murderous king still sleeps. Here is a song, a painting, a jig and a reel. Here is an island for an apple, an orchard for an eye. Here is a single, perfect apple for an island. The other permanent inhabitants are Annie Parker (who lives alone at Zachary’s end of the Island) and three dogs. Each Summer, Matthew Diamond (a retired schoolteacher from a missionary and theological college in Enon) stays on his Summer home on the Maine Coast and visits the Island brining relief parcels as well as teaching the children in a schoolhouse he, Zachary and Eha built � three of the children proving skilled pupils, with Ethan in particular a promising artist. Esther distrusts Matthew � partly as he reminds her of her father (as well as her own lightskinned sister who fled the Island) but also as she senses that his interest in the Island will bring it to wider attention and lead to its destruction. Now, here the mainlanders were, on Apple Island, in the form of this courteous, plain white man who turned Esther’s guts because he reminded her of her father and whose coming surely forecasted disaster. Courteous, and innocent, really, Esther thought, but innocent as in, as in—she searched for the word and it came to her from Shakespeare, from Hamlet—innocent as in artless. He was not innocent in the sense of being blameless, but in the sense of being oblivious to the greater, probably utter, catastrophe into which the, yes, artless graciousness of bringing the school and lessons would draw them all. And her fears come to pass as, inspired by eugenic theories and by a newspaper article and series of photos which talks about “the little rock’s queer brood of paupers and the squalor in which they live� decide to make the Islanders “all related by blood .. many or most clinically idiotic as well as lazy� wards of the state - first sending Doctors to measure and examine them, then taking the Larks to an institution (an act resulting in tragedy) and later forcibly expelling the Islanders. Matthew knowing this is coming decides to rescue Ethan � relying on his white skin and artisitic talent to get a placement on the Enon estate to refine his painting skills � and a whole side story takes place there as Ethan falls in love with Bridget - a young serving girl herself from a remote Island community - note that if the reader has already not drawn very strong connections between this book and Audrey Magee’s “The Colony� then Bridget � if I may be permitted a Darwinian pun given the Eugenics underpinnings � provides the Missing Link). The two start a sexual relationship and that story ends rather inevitably and leads to Ethan fleeing the estate (and the novel) ahead of expulsion and Bridget (and her unborn baby) becoming the last refugees to take shelter on the ark of the Island. Matthew is a complex character with an aspect of his personality � his attempts to help the Islanders despite his secret aversion to those of non-white races � explicitly modelled by Harding on the theologian Karl Barth and his role in aiding Jews fleeing Germany despite his own deep feelings of antisemitism. Harding was drawn to Barth and other theologians by Marilynne Robinson (and others) and their and her influence on her writing is clear in a novel infused with biblical imagery - particularly that of the Flood and then the Ark which effectively bookend the story � with the expelled Honey family feeling the destruction of their Island � the novel ends on that destruction � on a raft. Esther saw them all on the raft as they might be seen from the shore, or higher, from over the water, from above the ocean, castaways, a bitter old harridan and her grown brother son and two granddaughters, a mutt, and a pregnant stranger, adrift together on a raft piled with their home in pieces, the house a gesture toward and persistence at the kind of home they’d all wanted for themselves since they’d come to the rock, the island, and clung to it, always knowing that sooner or later they’d be noticed, for the worse, and be expelled back out onto the waters. Esther lifted her face and looked back at her home. That poor island, she said. That poor little island of such poor dear souls. Driven from our home, our ark, our little basket in the bullrushes. All for some kind of hotel, they say. The final aspect of the novel is that it is threaded through with the catalogue of a 21st century exhibit of some of Ethan’s paintings (as well as some letters and photos) commemorating the Islander’s lives some century after their (now seen as shameful) expulsion. So a complex and multifacted novel which is in my view moved from excellent to outstanding by the power of Harding’s writing � long complex run-on sentences which build in power and impact but ones in which it feels, something like Zachary’s elaborate biblical scenes, in which each word has been carefully and patiently carved. And mixed with this much literary imagery (the Bible and Shakespeare proving the main but far from exclusive sources) and shimmering descriptions of the natural world of the Island � which themselves draw on Ethan’s careful observations that inform his paintings. Just as in “The Colony� Harding is also capable of taking the same scene and switching in it between points of view � a relatively trivial but beautifully captured incident in which the two Honey girls bathe in the sea, being a perfect example. Overall � very highly recommended. The sun rose and set every day. The moon, too. The tides went out and came in. The seasons turned in order. Some of the trees lost their leaves in the autumn and grew them back in the spring. People ate breakfast and supper when they had food and smoked and drank their tea. They had babies and raised them. They worked and slept. They sang and laughed and yelled and wept and fought and coupled. But from the first time she’d heard it, Esther Honey understood that if the man Jesus had died and been buried then really and truly rose, it was the only time such a thing had ever happened and that meant everything else in the world took its real meaning from that young man lying dead in his grave and awakening back to life and rolling the stone away from his tomb and saying goodbye to his friends and helpers not in spirit but actually in that body that had died and come back to life....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 27, 2023
Jul 05, 2023
|
Aug 27, 2023
Jul 07, 2023
|
Jul 05, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1838956247
| 9781838956240
| 1838956247
| 3.76
| 12,271
| Apr 03, 2023
| Feb 02, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Winner of the Arthur C Clarke award #4 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worke Winner of the Arthur C Clarke award #4 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize - I originally read this book ahead of the longlist announcement and then revisited subsequently - my original review is below. On a second read I appreciated more a number of aspects: - Leigh (via Geert’s father) strong ancestral connections to the VOC and the links that gave between private enterprise (in practice unbridled/rapacious mega-capitalism) and the need for funding for extreme exploration which is explored (pun intended) in the rest of the novel - the way we come to question (via her sister) Leigh’s strongly and closely held views of her own childhood origin story and how that matches the overall book’s theme of questioning the origins of life on earth - the concept of care (or neglect) and connectedness and how it links across: early cellular symbiosis; the evolving relationship of the two sisters to their mother; the crew’s interaction with the Algae; the relationship between the crew and their mission support and how this alters with distance; the mission supervisor’s sudden absence from her daughter’s life; and of course ultimately humanity to an earth suffering extreme environmental degradation I also found that the book, early on, contained multiple breadcrumbs as to it’s ending as well as to the wider recurring themes of circularity and connectedness: Just a few examples linking Leigh’s favourite species, her mother’s condition, her Algse container breakthrough (but there are many more): My favourite species were those that lay dormant in husk form before reanimating, such as the rotifers discovered in Arctic ice-sheets after 24,000 lifeless years. Able to withstand almost any force, they seemed to challenge the distinction between life and death, annihilating the concept of straight and linear time to suggest something more circular and repetitious instead. Some parts of the overall idea therefore made more coherent sense in a second read - but others more clearly ended up as unexplained or even just dropped. I think this deliberate as the author has said: I work hard at getting the right balance between mystery and revelation. As a reader, it’s something I prize � an irresolvable quality, a lasting strangeness. I don’t want to finish a novel and feel that everything is completed, settled, the experience over. I want to continue living with the books I love most. . Perhaps for me some aspects were left too open ended - while I am no fan of hard science fiction, slightly more revelations on the origins of Datura would have made this a stronger book for me. I also like the first time did not really enjoy sections of the novel around the sea voyage, training or space travel and their mix of tedium and, for me, hard to follow action. ORIGINAL MAY 2023 REVIEW Still, I should be focusing on where I was going, the new life awaiting me, the work I'd always wanted and that seemed almost too good to be true. With the promise of virtually unlimited backing of my research, this was the easiest decision I'd ever made, even if I knew almost nothing about the organisation funding me. Fenna wouldn't have wanted the alternative, a world where I continued to work at the university, regretting the incredible opportunity that had passed me by. So while I waited in Departures, scanning the listings, gripping my luggage tightly at my knees, I tried to endorse the decision, tried to commit to it and feel the excitement of a new life just beginning. I thought of Endeavour, where all this had started, but however hard I concentrated on the submersible rising, carrying its material from the radical depths, Fenna's image intruded, returning me to my childhood and telling me this was all just futile escape, that every time I tried to push my past into insignificance I only committed to it further. My work inevitably returned me to what I fled, my obsession with origins and life's formation; all that mattered, I supposed, after ever. thing, was that the fruits of this, whatever they were based on, had independent merit. Martin McInnes second novel “Gathering Evidence� was one of my favourite reads of 2020 and just like that book, this his third novel, is getting a lot of tips as a potential Booker longlistee, which does recognise literary science fiction � particularly when, just like this book (and its predecessor) it combines topicality, speculative imagination, a plethora of ideas, an a strong sense of empathy (see also “Bewilderment�). Interestingly, the book also has a similar opening conceit to “Gathering Evidence� � a female biological researcher, joining a scientific expedition, which is part funded by a mining corporation, partly shrouded in secrecy, quickly meets with a sense of threat and ends in tragedy. The book is set in a near future when climate change and pollution have accelerated. The first party narrator of most of the novel is Leigh, a Dutch Marine biologist with a particular interest in the early origins of life in ancient sea-based micro-organisms, but her own origins are equally important to the novel. Her late father Geert was a failed architect come reluctant water board/flood defence engineer, her still living mother Fenna a mathematician at the local University � but her childhood was marked by violent beatings by her father, deliberately unacknowledged by her mother and form which she successfully shielded her younger sister Helena (who works in financial law for banking/insurance adjustment firms and is now based in Jakarta, despite being younger and physically more distant bearing most of the burden of care for the suddenly ageing Fenna). The trip on which she goes (mainly in a menial help capacity) is Endeavour � an expedition which turns out to be investigating a unfathomably (pun intended) deep trench in the Atlantic Ocean, which equally unfathomably seems to have appeared overnight (found only a few weeks before the trip). What they find when they arrive only increases the mystery with divers (including Leigh) affected both emotionally and physically when they investigate the trench. Just before the trip scientists around the world announce an unexpected discovery (only a few weeks earlier) of a new spacecraft propulsion technology which opens up the possibility of deep space exploration. The next section some two years later, Leigh is contacted by a more senior scientist on Endeavour to bring her specialism (the development of algae) to assist with a project of the ICORS (Institute for Coordinated Research in Space � a collaboration between US/China/Russia to develop the new propulsion technology: note the author is clearly considerably more optimistic on the prospect for a complete near-term reset of Great Power politics than he is on the prospect of meaningful action on climate change). She realises that her role is to develop a form of algae which can be a self generating food source on a lengthy space trip � feeding off waste and the cultivation of it even providing crucial mental and emotional support for the astronauts). However she is frustrated at the secrecy about the details of the trip that she needs to fine tune her work; particularly when she is asked to use a gene sourced from the trench Endeavour investigated � a gene which seems particularly resilient to huge radiation and gravity shifts. What she does discover � via Uria (a senior member of the team who treats Leigh as closer to her than her own daughter Maria) � is far more bizarre than she could have imagined � drawing in a mysterious self-propelled artefact which appeared in the asteroid belt two years ago, as well as a strange recontact with the Voyager probe and recurring Cassini ovals. And over time she is drawn into the project, with both its ring of secrecy and then the possibility (and then actuality) of being asked to take part in the space expedition � which at the same time draws her away from her mother and sister just when they need her the most. My main criticism of the book would be that at times it seems to be aiming to build empathy in the reader by making the reading experience reflect that of deep space travel � long periods of ennui, broken only by sudden bursts of rather confusing action. And for me therefore I only really fully appreciated the book when it returns to earth and indeed moves first party narrator away from the rather enigmatic Leigh to the third party viewpoint of her more practical younger sister Helena who together with Maria visits Ascension Island in search for some form of answer � a section which returns to the theme of family origins; and a closing section which neatly (albeit perhaps a little too 2001 A Space Odyssey inspired) draws the novels mysteries together. Overall another strong book from an author carving a distinctive space at the intersection of literary and science fiction. The island was the ideal location to host a returning space-crew: the remoteness of the position, the deep ocean setting, the military presence and the absence of a civilian population. But there seemed to be something else, something consonant between the Proscenium I mission and Ascension. Both of them were scarcely credible, outrageous pieces of fiction. That her sister could have trained for and travelled on a deep-space mission was something she would never fully accept. It seemed only right that the place the crew would land on was similarly hard to believe. The thing about Ascension that provoked her, and disturbed her co-passenger with her laughter, was its exposure of how absurd, and unlikely, human settlement was. Ascension showed her, more than anything else, that her sister's inclusion in the Proscenium mission was no more unlikely, no more demanding of suspended disbelief, than her birth was. She gave one final smile as the wheels touched down on the tarmac in Singapore, still just the first stage, remarking that the original science-fiction story - the impossible adventure full of wonder and awe - was merely the existence of the species, all the moments she and her sister and their family and every other living person had shared....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 27, 2023
May 18, 2023
|
Aug 28, 2023
May 19, 2023
|
May 12, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1838858296
| 9781838858292
| 1838858296
| 4.11
| 18,888
| May 04, 2023
| May 04, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Shortlisted for the 2024 Walter Scott Prize for historical fiction. #7 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice Shortlisted for the 2024 Walter Scott Prize for historical fiction. #7 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: I re-read this book following its longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize - a prize which following the natural progression of the author’s first two books (longlisted, shortlisted) it is unsurprisingly a favourite to win, particularly when set against a longlist almost entirely denuded of the books which were rightly widely predicted to have been in contention for the prize. I must admit I came to the re-read in a sceptical frame of mind, still slightly uneasy about the perception of conflict of interest with longlisting an author who is a Booker judge (yes on the International Prize but still..) in the very same year, and also after reading a (now hastily edited) interview on the Booker website where the author stated his desire to be the first ever Asian winner of the prize (well apart from say last year). But as I started the book I must admit it had the feeling of sinking into a warm bath or a comfy pair of slippers - Eng is a high quality, rather old fashioned writer - as a number of us have commented this is the sort of book which could easily have won the Booker prize 20-30 years ago. I also enjoyed sourcing Somerset Maugham’s “The Causarina Tree� and seeing how (as the author said himself in the aforementioned interview): How you read The House of Doors will affect your reading of The Letter, which in turn will then change how you view The House of Doors, which in turn will then alter your impressions of The Letter, which in turn will � and on and on it goes, a pair of mirrors, reflecting each other into infinity, the patterns of the reflections changing every time you look at them. And perhaps as a result the theme of storytelling and legacy was much more dominant for me this time than ideas of privileges or the love story. Now it has to be said I almost never have baths and never wear slippers - so the feeling although comforting did also rather jar with my feeling that a really good novel should be doing something at least a little new as well as more relevant in a contemporary sense. As a result this book remains somewhere on the edges of my shortlist although I would be surprised if it is not on the judges� one. ORIGINAL PRE-PUBLICATION REVIEW - MAY 2023 Over the course of the day I had drilled down deep into the layers of strata, all the way into the bedrock of my memories, recollecting my life in Penang, the people I had known there � Arthur and my brother and Sun Wen. But most of all I had been reliving the two weeks when Willie Maugham and his lover had stayed with us.� Tan Twan Eng’s only two previous novels (“The Gift of Rain� (2007) and “The Garden of Evening Mists� (2012)) were respectively longlisted and shortlisted for the Booker Prize � the latter novel also won the Walter Scott Prize for historical fiction. So his first novel for 11 years must automatically be in consideration for the 2023 Prize � although one wonders how his role as a judge on the International Booker Prize this year interacts with that. The epigraph to the novel is from Somerset Maugham’s literary memoir “The Summing Up� : “Fact and Fiction are so intermingled in my work that now, looking back on it, I can hardly distinguish one from the other� � and that rather conveniently does sum up this novel � a part fact, part fictional retelling of Maugham’s stay in Eng’s native Penang during Maugham (and his younger secretary and lover Gerald Haxton)’s travels in the Federated Malay states in 1921 which (together with a later trip in 1925) provided the inspiration for his short story collection “The Causarina Tree�: this novel effectively setting out a potential inspiration for the story “The Letter� which is based on the real life 1911 murder trial of Ethel Proudlock and has as key characters a Leslie (as the murderess) and a Robert (as her husband). The novel opens with a Prologue in South Africa in 1947, where the long widowed Lesley Hamlyn moved 25 years previously from their colonial life in Penang in an attempt to prolong the life of her lawyer husband Robert whose breathing has been badly affected by a gas attack in World War I (he also suffers from shell shock). She receives a parcel with an old first edition of “The Causarina Tree� and found herself “instantly transported back to Malaya. I felt a heavy tropical heat smothering me, thick and steamy, and the pungent, salty tang of the mudflats at low tide clogged my nostrils.� - something of a challenge that Eng sets himself to achieve the same effect in the reader as for the rest of the novel (other than an Epilogue back in 1947 South Africa) we are in Penang with chapters alternating between Leslie (in the first person) and Maugham (in the third). The chapters start in 1921 during Maugham (and Haxton)’s stay with his student friend Robert (and Lesley) at their Penang House named after the Causarina tree which dominates its garden. Maugham suffering ill-health and reeling from the loss of his fortune to a bust stockbroker (and the risk to his plans to leave his wife for Gerald) sets down to write a new stories - and gradually gains the confidence of Lesley who takes the opportunity to recount to him what happened to her in 1910, so unburdening herself of secrets (hers and others) that she has kept hidden until now. ‘Where does a story begin, Willie?� I asked. This story which then forms a series of 1910 first party chapters (but effectively retold in 1921) have four main elements: the arrest of her friend Ethel and her own involvement in the trial as a character witness; the visit to Penang of the real life exiled Chinese revolutionary Sun Yat Sen () and Lesley’s embracing of the cause � even if the cause seems reluctant to embrace her as part of the Western coloniser; her realisation of the truth of her own marriage; her resulting forming of a life defining but entirely clandestine relationship with Arthur � one of Sun Yat Sen’s biggest supporters in Penang and the owner of the eponymous shophouse; One of the strongest themes of the novel could be said to be the clash of privileges. Lesley challenges both Sun Yat Sen on the misogyny which seems to her to be a tolerated part of his revolutionary aims (including male-only polygamy) � while he in turn scorns the influence fo the English on the Chinese in Malay that should he feels be focused on fighting the terrible regime in their home country, not aspiring to the riches of their coloniser. And even more interestingly debates with Willie on the relative lack of rights in British and Colonial Society of homosexuals (the novel takes part against the repercussions of the Oscar Wilde trial) and married women. The novel’s other real strength is its ability to rise to the challenge that Eng sets himself � in matching if not exceeding Maugham’s ability to transport the reader to the sights, sounds and scents of Penang. Although related to this, if there is a misstep it is the author’s occasional lapses into having characters (Lesley in particular) think like a dictionary entry � for example There is something about the shophouses of Penang I find beautiful and evocative. When Robert had been away at the Front I had spent many a morning with my easel and stool on a street corner in town, sketching and painting watercolours of these shophouses. Built at the turn of the eighteenth century, these buildings blended elements of southern Chinese and Indian architecture. With their exteriors limewashed in a variety of bright colours and embellished with detailed and eye-catching features, they are an artist’s dream. Their first floor formed a narrow porch, creating a connected walkway about five feet wide, what the Hokkiens called ‘goh kaki�. This five-foot way is usually laid with brightly patterned terracotta tiles, while the front doors � often a two-leaf comb door opening up to reveal a plain and more sturdy pair of inner timber doors � are flanked by shuttered windows on both sides. Above the windows usually sit a pair of air vents, shaped to symbolise bats and secured by thin vertical iron bars. The façade of the second floor is taken up by timber louvred shutters and, more often than not, a strip of parapet wall perforated with a row of jade-green ceramic air vents. Storytelling is key to the novel � on the first page Lesley says “A story, like a bird of the mountain, can carry a name beyond the clouds, beyond even time itself. Willie Maugham said that to me, many year ago� and that image and idea recurs throughout the novel; partly as Willie justifies his writing methodology � confessing something of his own weakness and then sitting quietly while others unburden themselves to him, only to use their stories himself for (at the end of the day) making and then restoring his fortune. At the book’s end, Lesley returns to it as she reflects that by in a sense betraying her friend Ethel’s story (although she does not grasp the full truth of that story until years later) to Maugham as it allowed him to immortalise her in writing and later a film. Overall a novel that is perhaps doing a little too much: part famous writer biography; part examination of the process of telling and writing stories � your own and others; part period and place drama; part historical political fiction; part courtroom murder-trial drama; and (as the characters themselves emphasise) fundamentally a love story. But nevertheless one that will I think linger with the reader. My thanks to Canongate for an ARC via NetGalley People around here had expected me to pack up and return to Penang after I buried Robert. There were days when I asked myself why I didn’t do it. But � sail home � to what? And to whom? Everyone I had known in Malaya was either dead or had disappeared into distant lands and different lives. And then war had broken out all over the world and the Japanese had invaded Malaya. So I had remained here, a daub of paint worked by time’s paintbrush into this vast, eternal landscape....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 25, 2023
May 09, 2023
|
Aug 26, 2023
May 11, 2023
|
May 11, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1803510005
| 9781803510002
| B0BSL7TWKF
| 3.02
| 12,185
| Jul 06, 2023
| Jul 06, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
Now winner of the 2023 Scotiabank Giller Prize Shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize #3 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longl Now winner of the 2023 Scotiabank Giller Prize Shortlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize #3 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Having originally read this pre-publication due to the author featuring on the Granta list (see below) I revisited it after its welcome longlisting for the 2023 Booker Prize. Here, I thought, as I made my slow way home, my fingers stained by the new, fresh berries, here was what came to the surface after so many throes and convulsions. Soon we would no longer need to withdraw to the desert for a space of contemplation and self-abnegation, Soon, personal ascesis would arrive in the form of one more letter, one more mass mortality event, one more migration stopped by total annihilation. Nature and well-being, the Home Office, any number of crooks and lowlifes. I wanted to be good in the terrible world. I thought of the birds. I accumulated fidelities in this space of diminishing returns. On the one hand, I felt that my obedience had been rewarded at last. On the other, in this cold and beautiful countryside, I feared I was living a life which I had done nothing to earn and I felt sure of some swift and terrible retribution. As I bit into the last strawberry, I began to weep because language, I felt, was no longer at our disposal, because there was nothing in the word that we could use. Nothing settled in place. As I expected this is a book which hugely repays a re-read - revealing different themes and ideas. For me second time around I particularly noticed the interplay of guilt/innocence and even more so the idea of time: how the past and present are linked in a way far more complex than simple linearity or progress. I also appreciated more the implicit elements of the novel that played towards our current world politics (see for example my choice of quote) - like it’s fellow longlistee “Prophet Song� it treats global migration obliquely but powerfully. I think a third re- read would provide yet another layer - this is a book whose individual sentences can have more ideas than entire conventional novels. All of that might suggest the book will fare well in the next stages of the prize as the judges re-encounter each book �. but so different is this from most of the rest of the longlist that I fear for it’s chances - and it has been interesting to see the very mixed reactions this novel has provoked in those following the prize (some I would say rather like the suspicion that the locals feel to the narrator � where after all is it’s sense of traditional plot progression). Re-rated as 4.5 * ORIGINAL APRIL 2023 REVIEW My experience of continuity had been limited to the way each new catastrophe sat in the last, as if it had already happened and would go on happening, on and on. And so I lived in the historical rupture of the present, in the historical aberration of my life, and I submitted to those that had me at their mercy in an effort to soften their hearts. But now, for the moment, things were well. I had found a way to serve the community, in silence and at a distance (for had not the sages said that good deeds are better done in anonymity, without gratitude?), in my brother’s absence I had found some form for the days. If in the preceding weeks I had loved too well my walks among the budding trees of the forest, if I had felt the smallest temptation to withdraw my obedience, I knew that once again I had to gain mastery over myself, over the motions of my spirit, various and vain. I read this novel as it is the second novel, to be published in June 2023, from an author who in late April 2023 was selected for the decennial Granta Best of Young British Novelists list. Both in her choice of epigraph, and in some interviews after her debut novel, the author has made clear that a key inspiration was the late artist Paula Rego and a quote from a 2004 Guardian interview about her work � “I can turn the tables and do as I want. I can make women stronger, I can make them obedient and murderous at the same time�. The novel itself explores precisely that theme � an unnamed narrator, who has almost been trained for obedience from day one of her life in a life of service which turns to sacrifice to conscious self-abnegation but then later in the book to agency. Where to begin. I can it is true shed light on my actions only, and even then it is a weak and intermittent one. I was the youngest child, the youngest of many � more than I care to remember � whom I tended from my earliest infancy, before, indeed, I had the power of speech myself and although my motor skills were by then scarcely developed, these, my many siblings, were put in my charge. I attended to their every desire, smoothed away the slightest discomfort with perfect obedience, with the highest degree of devotion, so that over time their desires became mine, so that I came to anticipate wants not yet articulated, perhaps not even yet imagined, providing my siblings with the greatest possible succour, filling them up only so they could demand more, always more, demands to which I acceded with alacrity and discreet haste � I continued to spend the long years since childhood cultivating solitude, pursuing silence to its ever-receding horizon, a pursuit that demanded a particular quality of attention, a self-forgetfulness on my part that would enable me to bring to bear the most painstaking, the most careful consideration to the other, to treat the other as the worthiest object of contemplation. In this process, I would become reduced, diminished, ultimately I would become clarified, even cease to exist. I would be good. I would be all that had ever been asked of me. The book is set when the English-speaking (and possibly British) narrator is a fairly unsuccessful adult, with almost no non-familial ties and working as an audio typist at a legal firm (a role she can easily perform remotely). She accepts (of course in obedience) a request from her recently separated oldest brother (who has always made it his personal mission to refine her self of self renunciation and service) to act as a housekeeper/valet/housesitter for him while he concentrates on running his increasingly successful business interests in an unnamed cold and traditional region in a distant Northern country from which their persecuted ancestors (the family appear to be Jewish) originate. There she is regarded with something between hostility and wariness by the superstitious locals, something not helped by her, despite her linguistic skills as a student, being unable to grasp the language and so cut off from the myriad customs and conventions of the nearby town � in contrast to her brother (who is absent for most of the book on business travels) apparently complete integration. Her and the locals difficult relationship is not helped by a series of animal-victim incidents which appear to start after her coming, introducing menace and fear to the town. For much of the book we see the narrator (filtered of course through her own thoughts) as a victim of injustice and exclusion bought on by coincidental circumstance: but in keeping with the Rego quote, a second strand starts to emerge � the villagers start to be more fearful than hostile, we begin to question both her reliability and professed innocence in the incidents. What initially seems like a token attempt to make overtures to the villagers via the nocturnal placing of some grass dolls she makes, starts to take a darker interpretation as we see how the villagers react and question her motives. And this feeling of taking control, of turning the tables not just on the villagers for their sleights to her and possibly their atrocities to her ancestors, but to her family for the role they trained her to adopt - only becomes stronger when her brother returns and immediately starts to suffer with some form of unspecified ailment with the narrator increasingly controlling him. Towards the end (reminding me of “Pew� in a book which already reminded me of Catherine Lacey) there are some fascinating power dynamics in a scene at a church service. Overall this is a very enigmatic story � one which I think would repay a re-read but which I think even then is unlikely to reveal its secrets as it is not the type of book designed to have a solution or explanation � the author said of her debut “One question I struggle with most is what the book is about� and I think the same applies here. The narrator makes it clear at the end that if anything she has even more questions and even greater distancing from the answers than at the beginning. Instead the book is an oblique but memorable exploration of themes such as familial and societal pressures to conform, and the historical and present day rejection of the outsider. Overall recommended. My thanks to Granta for an ARC via NetGalley ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 23, 2023
Apr 29, 2023
|
Aug 24, 2023
Apr 30, 2023
|
Apr 29, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1838856064
| 9781838856069
| B0B8DMQWGC
| 3.78
| 6,265
| Feb 07, 2023
| Feb 09, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Shortlisted for the RSL Encore Award for Second Novels Shortlisted for the 2024 Dylan Thomas Prize (for authors 39 or under) #6 in my Booker Prize longl Shortlisted for the RSL Encore Award for Second Novels Shortlisted for the 2024 Dylan Thomas Prize (for authors 39 or under) #6 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize - I originally read this book pre publication in January and revisited after its longlisting. My views second time around were similar to my first reading. Stripping away the Nigerian cultural and political nuances, and the terms and untranslated words from the local Yoruba dialect, this is actually I would say at heart the most conventional novel on the shortlist so that a second read did not really reveal anything different to a first read - but I still found it enjoyable. Perhaps in a second read and knowing the way the characters will interact, the two story lines seem less disparate than before and the pacing easier to follow. ORIGINAL JANUARY REVIEW “Àlàkẹ�? Àlàkẹ�?� Yèyé turned away from the balcony, thinking for a moment that her father was standing behind her, calling her name. But it was only Aunty Bíọ́lá reverting to Àlàkẹ� after calling Yèyé for a while. No one called her Àlàkẹ� anymore, not since she and her husband received their chieftaincy titles the year Wúràọlá was born. “Ṣéèsí� Aunty Bíọ́lá asked. “I’m all right.� “Kóìtiírí kí o mí wò sìì.� “Aunty Bíọ́lá, don’t worry. Àní, I’m all right. Óyá, let’s take the photo.� Yèyé moved away from the glass door and settled into a chair. Aunty Bíọ́lá handed her a framed photograph, and Yèyé set it on her knee without glancing at it. It was a photo of their mother. From before. Had she even taken any pictures after that diagnosis? Yèyé and her sisters used the same photo at every wedding and major birthday. Their Mother. Seated on a chair in the yà mí tùkatùka pose. Hands on her knees, one gripping a clutch, the other splayed to show the gold rings on every other finger, both wrists decked with beads. Her ìró tied above her waist. Two layers of coral beads nestled against her bùbá. The aṣọ-òkè ìró and gèlè were probably red, but there was no way to tell for sure, since the photo was black-and-white. Ayòbámi Adébáyò’s debut novel “Stay With Me� was shortlisted for the 2017 Women’s Prize. The author is born and based in Nigeria but studied at the UEA and still spends time based in Norfolk. This is her second novel is something of a state of the nation examination of modern Nigeria � with a particular emphasis on examining the struggle to strive for status and economic self-sufficiency against a background of political corruption, at both ends of the social spectrum. The story is told in two largely separate stories, which link rather tangentially via a tailor’s shop, but thematically much wider, in a way which both shows the huge divide between the haves and the have nots in Nigeria and shows how both suffer from the same underlying societal issues. The first character is Ẹniọlá. Son of a history teacher, he had his heart set on a place at a prestigious boarding school (Federal Unity) but the families fortunes have taken a severe turn for the worse after a (historical) purge of Humanities teachers by a newly elected state government keen to emphasise “useful”subjects And then, at the end of his first term in primary six, just a couple of weeks before Christmas, his father and over four thousand teachers in the state were sacked. At first, everything at home went on as usual. And things get even worse � while Ẹniọlá still dreams of Federal Unity, his place at Glorious Destiny comes under threat � and he and his more assertive younger sister are regularly beaten for their parents inability to meet the school fees. His father has lapsed into a debilitating depression and he, his mother and sister are forced to resort to begging (both in the streets and from estranged family members) and even then cannot meet the fees forcing him to move to the dreader and disfuncional state system. His parents see his future as an apprentice to a tailor, but cannot provide fees for that either and in any event Ẹniọlá has not interest in that and dreams only of when he can at least return to Glorious Destiny (which he had previously regarded as anything but its name). When at his new school he falls in with a gang linked to a local politician he decides its time to take his own actions in light of his parents failure. The second character is Wúràọlá � from a prosperous family. She is in her first year of training to be a Doctor, a prestigious position in theory but in practice one which exposes her to the horrors of the completely defunded and under-equipped health service (mirroring the state school in which Ẹniọlá learns nothing) and to the rather totalitarian attentions of the Consultants she studies under (mirroring Ẹniọlá’s treatment at the hands of his teachers). Where Ẹniọlá’s parents have completely failed to fulfil his dreams of boarding school, Wúràọlá is effectively obliged to fulfill her parents dreams for her live � marriage (particularly critical to them as she approaches thirty) to a childhood friend � Kúnlé � a TV broadcaster and son of a businessman who is standing for a local election. Her father throws in his backing, family name and funding to the businessman, despite the opposition of the aforementioned local politician, valuing the connections it would bring. Her mother urges the marriage as a form of security while also suggesting Wúràọlá like her, acquires her own independence by accumulating jewellry which she can sell in extreme (just of course as Ẹniọlá’s mother does on a smaller scale). In any case, his family was well connected. Yèyé knew from his mother that Kúnlé had had multiple job offers of the best kind, the types he did not need to apply for to have. An uncle in Abuja who wanted Kúnlé to head his company’s marketing department. An aunt in NNPC who had a slot she wanted to give him. And now Wúràọlá said he’d stopped trying to get a transfer to Lagos or Abuja, because his father wanted him close by for the campaign. Such a sensible boy and a good son. What was a shot at reading the news at nine to the whole country if he could help his father become state governor? Yes, he would have been perfect if he was a doctor. Just imagine, Wúràọlá as the second half of a Dr. & Dr. (Mrs.) unit. Perfection. But whatever Kúnlé had lost by not studying medicine, he had in family connections that would nudge him up any ladder he chose to climb and cushion any falls before propelling him upward again and again. Yèyé had lived long enough to realise that Aunty Bíọ́lá had always been right: real wealth was intergenerational, and the way Nigeria was set up, your parentage would often matter more than your qualifications. Wúràọlá too has a younger sister also free with her opinions “Why can’t it be my own house?� Forty-seven. On Sunday morning, when her father asked if she planned to keep her husband waiting as she’d done to him before they left for church together, Mọ́tárá had decided to spend the week keeping a count of how many times anyone in her family would speak about how she planned to behave when she was married. Or living in her husband’s house. Her husband’s house was the destination everyone had been referring to since she was old enough to understand what they meant. If all she had noted that week alone was any indication, the husband’s house was the destination of all good girls when they became women, just as heaven was the destination of all good people when they died. So far, between her parents and the aunts she’d spoken to on the phone that week, she’d counted forty-seven references to how she would behave in her marriage, in her husband’s house, towards her in-laws. But also the only family member who realises that Kúnlé for all his and Wúràọlá’s love and sexual compatability, also increasingly resorts to violence towards her, often motivated by jealousy over an ex-boyfriend and fellow Doctor. The book is full of authentic detail but can at first seem distancing � because of its unabashed use of terms and untranslated words from the local Yoruba dialect (see for example the opening quote). At times I felt like a book which should have been full of colour and nuance was a little too black-and-white as a result. But I felt that by persisting with the story and absorbing the local detail I gained an immersion into the two worlds. And I think it is also fair to say that this is a slow burn of a story which also therefore needs (but rewards) some persistence. The first 40% of the book or so seems like a very slow introduction to the two main characters � their daily lives, families and challenges. We then see, independently, how events in their lives exacerbate those challenges, before only in perhaps the last 10-20% of the book do the two stories overlap in what ends as a dramatic but also chilling ending � showing how in a society marked by inequality and political corruption � no one, no matter how well connected or rich, can be secure � a lesson which increasingly feels like it can apply much more widely than Nigeria. My thanks to Canongate for an ARC via NetGalley ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 29, 2023
Jan 17, 2023
|
Aug 29, 2023
Jan 19, 2023
|
Dec 16, 2022
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0593296109
| 9780593296103
| 0593296109
| 3.82
| 16,767
| Feb 28, 2023
| Mar 21, 2023
|
really liked it
|
Shortlisted for the 2024 Dublin Literary Prize #9 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post o Shortlisted for the 2024 Dublin Literary Prize #9 in my Booker Prize longlist rankings after reading all the longlist books twice. My Instagram post on what worked for me, what did not, my favourite quote and of course a book-themed Golden Retriever photo here: Longlisted for the 2023 Booker Prize - which caused me to re-read the book 10 months after my first reading. Enough time goes by and it is as if old things never happened. Things once fresh, immediate, terrible, receding away into old God's time, like the walkers walking so far along Killiney Strand that, as you watch them, there is a moment when they are only a black speck, and then they're gone. Maybe old God's time longs for the time when it was only time, the stuff of the clockface and the wristwatch. But that didn't mean it could be summoned back, or should be. He had been asked to reach back into memory, as if a person could truly do that. On a re-read my thoughts were very similar to the first time. The writing is undoubtedly consistently strong and not infrequently (small in joke there as Tom enjoys his double negatives) brilliant. On a descriptive/complex sentence level only Paul Harding and Paul Lynch from the longlist can compete with Sarah Bernstein taking a more enigmatic route to her excellence. Some passages are, slightly oddly, written in a clear omniscient narrator voice and these (for example one on neutrinos) are some of the most transcendent. But much of the rest seems to be the close third person voice of Tom and while many very cleverly contain metaphors, similes and other imagery which closely match what we know of Tom and his lives experience, others - as seems effectively to be a repeated stylistic choice of Barry - seem much more the author’s voice than his character’s. And Barry himself it should be noted sees the voice as effectively Tom’s : He is reliable in the sense that he is actually experiencing what is being described (by me, in the third person). I felt my job was to be his witness and to see and hear what he was seeing and hearing, and to take it down faithfully, and not butt in. In terms of my main reservations (and in fact let me add one - the choice of a native reservation and the fate of Joe seems an odd choice of cultural appropriation): the blurring of time and reality was less bothersome to me this time (and perhaps more clearly signposted than I remembered) as well as justified by Tom’s long term and accumulative PTSD; while by contrast the catalogue of horrors was if anything worse second time (not least as I had forgotten some of them). Barry has said of the graphicness of the revelations (particularly around clerical abuses) My understanding of abuse is, the survivor carries terrible imagery which is so hard to erase, and even harder to suppress. My prayer was that, by being forensic in my descriptions when necessary, readers might elect to take on some of those images and memories, as an act of solidarity - but I feel this does not address the frequency of horrors which also go much beyond this. But overall I think this could well appear in the shortlist and while it will probably not make my own list I could not even begrudge this highly talented author a Booker win. ORIGINAL REVIEW FROM OCTOBER 2022 Quoth the raven, never would be. Here was now, a light year removed from that reverberating day, and all the things that followed, all the hard things, the happy things, the happier things. The usual fog cleared a moment from his mind. The small hours were refining him down, like a rough whiskey. What would God want to take from his story, he wondered. St bloody Peter at his gate. What was important in all this, his life, his life, like any other life? He thought suddenly of all the detectives on the earth, and all the detectives that had been on the earth � would it be hundreds of thousands? Would they be herded into the detective enclosure? And made to race against each other like horses? All the detectives � the violent crimes, the rapes, the murders, the con jobs, the robberies, the frauds, the very waterspout, the waterfall, the great flood of crimes in human stories. The hubbub, the hubbub. That had so concerned them all. Like the waterfall in Powerscourt, pouring down, pouring down. And all these men, in all the languages of the world, all the races, all the forces, trying to peer in, to weigh up, to come to conclusions, to strike it lucky, cop a break, to squeak a case through by the skin of its teeth. What was their worth, their own weight? And what was at the heart of it? His life, his little life? The fog edged away from the shore of himself, the sea opened like the stage in a theatre, the helpful sun burned in its element, there was a truth told to him, a truth, in his curious age, in his palpable decay, that there at the heart of it, there at the heart of it, for ever and always, was June. Winnie and Joseph and June. But June. Sebastian Barry is a much garlanded writer: most notably twice Costa Novel of The Year winner (both times then going on to win Costa Book of the Year across all categories) and four times longlisted for the Booker Prize (two of which books went on to be shortlisted), he has also won the Kerry Group Irish Fiction Prize, the Irish Book Awards Best Novel, the Walter Scott Prize, the Independent Booksellers Prize and the James Tait Black Memorial Prize. This is his first novel since the widely acclaimed “Days Without End� and its sequel “A Thousand Moons�. Those excellent novels (the only ones I have read) featured a very distinctive writing style: one which mixes plain speaking characters, and descriptions of violence and harsh poverty, with beautifully poetic imagery conveying the grandeur, beauty and terror of the American landscape and weather. The books could I think be criticised on two aspects: a rather made-for-Hollywood plot (with rather too many improbable rescues) and an apparent disconnect between the writing style (clearly written as a first person reminiscence and not as an omniscient narrator) and the narrators background. This book in short I would say: retains the evocative landscape writing - with the coast of Ireland substituted for the American plains; has a greater emphasis on interiority � but again conveyed in a beautifully crafted prose; retains the stark contrast between the beauty of the writing and the unpleasantness of much of what is being described (if anything I found that contrast stronger here); loses the made-for-Hollywood plot but retains a cinematic feel (more introspective art film than Hollywood Western); still has the slight disconnect that the beautiful prose is largely (not exclusively) the thoughts of the main character � even if this time expressed in the third person - and slightly incongruous to their background. The set up of the book is relatively simple: Tom Kettle is a retired Irish policeman who has moved into a small lean-to on the side of a Castle on the Irish Sea Coast. He is widowed (having lost his beloved wife June) with two children � a daughter Winnie who is his solitary, occasional visitor and a son Joe who has emigrated to America (working as a locum on a pueblo in New Mexico) and seems set on a simple if melancholic life. At the book’s opening two policeman visit him to ask for his help with a recently re-opened case concerning two allegedly abusive priests. Immediately Tom is forced to revisit the ghosts of memories, feeling and actions that he had long suppressed, with the past effectively colonising the present and with both Tom and our views of what is real and what is dream or memory increasingly unclear among the gradually revealed horrors and truths. On the strength side, in addition to the powerful writing, the book is a moving explanation of what it means to love and be loved, but one which is far from sentimental in its portrayal of the life long and generational impact of unpunished and unacknowledged abuse, and how even seeming justice can lead to an unbearable weight of guilt (particularly when coupled with the undeserved shame of a victim). On the weaker side I did feel that the two key tropes of the book: the blurring of past/present and reality/memory/dreams; and the unspooling atrocities were both overdone (particularly the latter as ultimately the accumulative revelations end up dampening rather than reinforcing their impact). But overall I think this is a book which will appeal hugely to existing Sebastian Barry fans � particularly those who enjoyed “Days Without End� as well as win him some new ones. My thanks to Faber for an ARC via NetGalley It was a story of atrocities, certainly. It was almost beyond description, and he had laboured for years not to describe it, to anyone else, and more importantly to himself. Never to allow the little sequence of horrors to play in his brain. Think everything else before he thought of those things. Think of things that did not exist, talk to the tumbleweeds of souls that did not exist. See ghosts before telling that story. Clamp his mind shut with heavy Victorian metal clamps. Now no more. It was no longer possible to be a citizen of grief, his passport to grief was cancelled, he couldn’t enter there. Now he must be brave. Of course, unbeknownst to him, he had been brave all his life. That was true, but not true for him. The main drone of the pipes he had heard under everything for sixty years and more was alarm and confusion, like the very pith of battle. Now that was not so, so much. He wondered was there God involved? Had he been released from his ordeal? He didn’t know. He could be suspicious of the brightness in him, in his limbs, in his almost ecstasy, as being something slipped into him by a medicinal god, like a needle with a vaccine in it. He didn't know. Something else knew. It might as well have phoned him on the telephone. Come in, come in, you can row that boat no more. The current was against you. Here is a little harbour. Rest up there....more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Aug 20, 2023
Oct 15, 2022
|
Aug 21, 2023
Oct 16, 2022
|
Oct 26, 2022
|
Hardcover
|

13 of 13 loaded