|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0593317416
| 9780593317419
| 0593317416
| 3.85
| 455
| Mar 14, 2023
| Mar 14, 2023
|
really liked it
| A fascinating paradox is that most transcendent experiences are completely ego-free. In the moment, we lose track of time and space, we lose track A fascinating paradox is that most transcendent experiences are completely ego-free. In the moment, we lose track of time and space, we lose track of our bodies, we lose track of our selves. We dissolve. And yet, as I suggest, spirituality emerges from consciousness and the material brain. And the paramount signature of consciousness is a sense of self, an “I-ness� distinct from the rest of the cosmos. Thus, curiously, a thing centered on self creates a thing absent of self. With a PhD in theoretical physics and as “the first person at MIT to receive dual faculty appointments in science and in the humanities�, Alan Lightman is well poised to think and write about the intersection of science and spirituality (and his writing has often addressed this intersection, as proven by his backlist). The Transcendent Brain reads like a final synthesis of this lifetime of thinking and writing � for a shortish book, it has countless references to the scientists, psychologists, and philosophers who have influenced Lightman’s thinking � but as interesting as I found the material, I don’t know if it really answered his own questions around whether the scientific method necessarily precludes a belief in God (or anything “spiritual� beyond the material world of what can be tested). Still a very interesting read that gave me much to think about. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) The driving forces for the emergence of spirituality are both biological and psychological: a primal affinity for nature, a fundamental need for cooperation, and a means of coping with the knowledge of our impending death. Some of these forces can be found in nonhuman animals, of course, but the full experience of spirituality may require the higher intelligence of Homo sapiens. Over the course of The Transcendent Brain, Lightman shares several transcendent experiences he has had throughout his life; so even though he identifies as an atheist, he understands what others mean by a religious or spiritual experience. He satisfactorily proves a material basis for consciousness (I enjoyed the bits about emergentism � just as you couldn’t predict the characteristics of water by examining its constituent elements of hydrogen and oxygen, there’s no need for Divine Intervention to explain how our minds are the natural result of the billions of synaptic connections in our brains) and he also shows the ways in which a sense of spirituality (and its fellowship-building) would have been an evolutionary advantage for early humans. One of the most intriguing passages I noted, about “the creative transcendent�, was: Practitioners and philosophers disagree on whether mathematical truth exists out there in the world, independent of the human mind � in which case mathematicians discover what is already there, like coming upon a new ocean � or whether mathematical ideas, theorems, and functions are invented out of the mind of the mathematician. It’s interesting to think that it’s no easier to prove the existence of math outside the human mind than to prove the existence of God; so what does that mean for his thesis? Science can never disprove the existence of God, since God might exist outside the physical universe. Nor can religion prove the existence of God, since any phenomenon or experience attributed to God might, in principle, find explanation in some nontheist cause. What I suggest here is that we can accept a scientific view of the world while at the same time embracing certain experiences that cannot be fully captured or understood by the material underpinnings of the world. And that’s a bit of Lightman having his cake and eating it too, which has apparently long put the author in the crosshairs of other, more strident, thinkers. Lightman writes about sharing his transcendent experiences during a debate with Richard Dawkins who mocked the author, dismissing people of faith as “nonthinkers� and labelling religion as “nonsense� (classic Dawkins). On a different occasion (as referenced in the Notes at the end), Lightman shared the stage with distinguished Islamic scholar Osman Bakar who, “strongly disagreed with me that we cannot prove the existence of God, stating that ‘revelation�, in both the sacred books and in personal experience, shows that we know God exists.� Acknowledging thusly that he can publicly represent either the pro-spiritual or anti-spiritual point-of-view, The Transcendent Brain reflects this squishy middleground (despite the author stating throughout that he is an affirmed atheist), and I don’t know if this non-resolution was entirely satisfying to me. And yet: I thoroughly enjoyed everything that Lightman shared and the internal musings they led to. Totally worthwhile read. For an idea of Lightman’s thinking (and some backlash it has elicited), here’s a link to an article in Salon from 2011: And an angry response in Salon a week later from Daniel Dennett: ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 27, 2023
|
Jan 29, 2023
|
Jan 30, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0812998626
| 9780812998627
| 0812998626
| 3.28
| 101,003
| May 16, 2023
| May 16, 2023
|
really liked it
| So many cars parked along the gravel driveway. So many guests, already here. It was all happening. Alex made her way to the entrance of the walled So many cars parked along the gravel driveway. So many guests, already here. It was all happening. Alex made her way to the entrance of the walled property. Her body carrying her along with the fluid quality of a dream. Did she expect some resistance? There was none. The big wooden door was wide open. As if everything was working in concert to allow for Alex’s arrival. To urge her forward. Already she had forgotten the walk there: couldn’t say how long it had taken, what roads she’d passed. The slate was wiped clean. Having previously loved Emma Cline’s The Girls, I was really looking forward to The Guest; and it did not disappoint. I think that what they have most in common � and what works the best for me � is a tone of disturbing uncanniness; things aren’t quite right, but you recognise the truth of them all the same. With an unlikeable (and pretty much unknowable) main character who drifts and grifts her way through life (surviving on transactional sex and petty theft, dulling her senses and reactions with stolen prescription drugs), as the past threatens to catch up with Alex and we watch tensely as she uses a string of unsuspectingly useful fools to meet her needs in the moment, the reader (this reader) couldn’t help but care for her and want things to work out in the end. Like a mashup of Patrica Highsmith and Ottessa Moshfegh � set in a Gatsbyesque summer playground of the rich on private Long Island beaches � The Guest appealed to a sense in me beyond the heart and mind, as though Cline plucked some deep chord that resonated on an infrasonic level; I felt this more than I can explain it and will acknowledge that might be an entirely personalised reaction. Absolutely worked for me; slight spoilers beyond. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) This thing with Simon. She leaned into Simon and he kept talking but dropped a hand to her low back. On the ride home, he’d tell her about his friends. Their private lives, their hidden problems. And Alex would ask questions and egg him on and he’d flash her a smile, his pleasure suddenly so boyish. This was real, her and Simon. Or it could be. We don’t end up learning much about Alex’s background � she is circumspect with the people she encounters; likewise circumspect with the reader � but we know she is twenty-two, has worked as an escort in NYC (after moving there for a failed modelling career), and after burning her bridges with friends, clients, and a certain ex-boyfriend that she ripped off, Alex was literally saved from homelessness by a rich middle-aged art dealer she met in a bar. This Simon impulsively installed Alex in his Long Island beach house, and after spending the summer buying her designer clothes, showing her off at parties, and allowing her to spend lazy days swimming in the pool or ocean, a misstep on Alex’s part sees Simon buying her a train ticket back to the city. But with no home or prospects to go back to (and that angry ex-boyfriend apparently looking for her everywhere), Alex convinces herself that if she can only find a place to stay for the six days until Simon’s famous end-of-summer Labour Day party, he will have cooled off and be relieved to see her walking back into his life. The tension comes from this ticking clock: Will Alex find shelter for the six days? Will Dom track her down? Would Simon even want to see her at the party if she makes it that far? And the details are painted in grippingly and with pathos: Alex uses everyone she meets � some of them fragile and all deserving of better � but I never thought of her as a sociopath; Alex was focussed on survival and I understood that she was going to do whatever it took to survive. So many nights she remembered only as a sour feeling, a bartender’s cold look, strangers trying not to stare as a man squeezed her knee. The men always wanted people to be aware that they were with Alex, wanted eyes to follow them as they headed toward the elevators. Did they imagine that they looked like anything other than what they were? As if anyone would have done the math and come up with a different explanation. Maybe it’s because we never learn anything about Alex’s background or childhood, but I never felt sorry for her path to sex work � with youth, beauty, and an ability to “read� people and transform into what they need her to be, Alex is simply using her strengths to make her way; there isn’t a big difference between advertising as an escort and being a rich man’s permanent sugar baby and she always seemed to be in control of her choices; but would someone finally choose her? Again: beyond plot and character, it was the vibe that really worked for me here; Cline’s writing just speaks to me and I am all ears. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 24, 2023
|
Jan 25, 2023
|
Jan 25, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0593727207
| 9780593727201
| 0593727207
| 3.71
| 7,789
| Apr 18, 2023
| Apr 18, 2023
|
really liked it
| I’d been trying to figure out what was missing from my life, and that unforgettable walk home from the eye doctor revealed the answer: I needed to con I’d been trying to figure out what was missing from my life, and that unforgettable walk home from the eye doctor revealed the answer: I needed to connect with my five senses. I’d been treating my body like the car my brain was driving around town, but my body wasn’t some vehicle of my soul, to be overlooked when it wasn’t breaking down. My body � through my senses � was my essential connection to the world and to other people. I agreed to join my daughter in the 75 Hard challenge, and among other “critical tasks�, I am committed to reading ten pages of a self-help book every day for seventy-five days � so although I had not read Gretchen Rubin before, Life in Five Senses was the first book I selected for the challenge; and I’m glad I did. As humans we are wired to filter out the stimuli that we're accustomed to, so it’s normal to waft through our lives without really sensing those things that we encounter every day. After a trip to the eye doctor left Rubin concerned about her long term sight, she resolved to really see her surroundings from then on; and being the kind of person who enjoys self-appointed tasks and challenges and recording her findings, Rubin decided to spend a year deeply exploring each of her senses and taking notes. Life in Five Senses is divided into what we commonly think of as our core senses (Rubin notes that others might include our sense of equilibrium or feeling one’s heart racing, but she’s focussed on the “Big Five� of sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch), and along with scientific information that Rubin includes from her research, the author shares many stories of her own experiences through the course of the year, often based on training or exploring her senses. This type of intentionality is exactly what the 75 Hard challenge is meant to promote and I did find myself inspired by Rubin’s project; the blend of informal storytelling and scientific research hit the sweet spot of interest for me, and again, I am really glad that I started my own project here. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) It was strange to realize that I make the world. In darkness and silence, my brain receives countless messages as my five senses probe my surroundings. In that outer world, there’s no color, no music, no scent until those messages return to my brain � and then the world bursts into life inside my body. One of the tasks that Rubin set before herself was to visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art every day for the year; to both find ways to focus on particular sensory experiences and to discover the surprising within the familiar. Acknowledging that the access, time, and freedom that she has for this project makes her “very fortunate�, Rubin jokes: When I told my college roommate about my experiment, she said dryly, “Note to self: move within walking distance of the Metropolitan Museum.� (At the end of the book, Rubin stresses: “I’d chosen a museum, but, of course, someone else might choose a different place. A park, a route through a neighborhood, front stoop � the place doesn’t really matter. With familiarity and repetition, the world reveals itself in an unexpected way.�) So, although living in NYC meant that Rubin could easily take courses on perfumery at the Pratt Institute, attend a Dinner in the Dark restaurant, or handily book a sensory deprivation tank � and these kind of heightened experiences do make for good reading � a walk with the dog through my own neighbourhood over the course of a year, while really being attuned to my senses, does sound like the most meaningful way to live; why waft through life? I was interested in Rubin’s project and appreciated the conclusions she drew and the stories of how she implemented her findings into her domestic life. As for the researched bits, I was intrigued by the following (about the brain’s focus on finding and studying faces): According to Roman statesman and writer Cicero, King Xerxes the Great “offered a prize for the man who could invent a new pleasure.� Inventing a new pleasure seems like an impossible task, yet this explains the extraordinary attraction of YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram, and, of course, Facebook. They give us entirely fresh ways to gratify our desire to look at faces. We can view more faces in a single scroll through social media than during a lifetime in a medieval village. And I found the following surprising but not surprising: Because our expectations shape our experience, we respond differently to the same scent if we’re in a context that tells us “Parmesan cheese� vs. “vomit,� or “pine tree� vs. “disinfectant cleaner.� Does gasoline smell good or bad? People disagree. What’s the smell of “fresh� � is it pine, flowers, the ocean? Claims that “citrus is cheering� and � peppermint is energizing� are based purely on learned associations. Americans find the smell of lavender “relaxing ,� but people from Brazil consider it “invigorating.� And I found several things very surprising (but not incredible enough to fact-check), as when Rubin writes, Though it seems possible that humans, like other animals, communicate with pheromones, researchers haven’t yet been able to identify a single one or when she notes in an aside Despite the old trick question, the tomato can qualify both as a fruit and a vegetable, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture categorizes it as a vegetable. So, surprising or not, I did appreciate the research that Rubin includes throughout. Even though I was celebrating my senses as never before, I kept dreaming up new ways to explore them. I knew that by going through my body, I could reach my spirit, and through my spirit, I could reach my body. And reaching the spirit through the body and the body through the spirit seems to be the point of living more intentionally. The 75 Hard challenge requires that I exercise twice a day, one of those times outside, and while walking my dog in the recent below freezing weather, I have to admit that concentrating on my senses � noting the odd bird call and the squeaking of my boots on the snow, looking for the pops of colour against the hazy white sky, really noticing a smell, even if it’s unpleasant diesel from a passing truck in the otherwise empty scent field � living in the moment and experiencing each one to the fullest, this trumps wafting through the day (or worse: trudging through the slush with my head down just so I can put a check mark on the chart; that’s a terrible metaphor for life.) Rubin ends Life in Five Senses with many recommendations for ways that a person can enhance their own sensory experience, and whether that might involve adding in pleasant stimuli (artwork or candles and or savoury treats) or removing annoying ones (really looking for clutter in the spaces we see every day, turning down [or off!] the jabbering television), there’s plenty here that anyone could implement to create a happier, more meaningful life. This was certainly the right book for me in the moment (even if the biggest challenge was limiting myself to reading just a bit of it every day). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 24, 2023
|
Feb 02, 2023
|
Jan 24, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1953534953
| 9781953534958
| B0BJ7P8VTJ
| 3.59
| 4,903
| Apr 20, 2023
| Jun 06, 2023
|
really liked it
| I think of the conversation I had with Rachel about the space station and the zoos. Maybe some of the animals might have got out, but I know that m I think of the conversation I had with Rachel about the space station and the zoos. Maybe some of the animals might have got out, but I know that most, if not all of the lab octopuses won’t have been so lucky. And I begin to list the animals I can think of that live in aquariums: the sea urchins, and rays, and the starfish, and on and on until I make myself stop, and I think instead about what Rachel asked me. I can’t take her with me if I do decide to go. I can’t save her; I can barely save myself. Set against the backdrop of a global pandemic, The Memory of Animals asks pertinent questions about freedom and responsibility: examining not only how we treat one another but how we treat the other creatures of the Earth. Weaving together three narrative threads (one in the present day and two from the past), author Claire Fuller maintains tension by dangling mysteries that don’t get untangled until the very end, and I was glued to the page � both wanting those answers and savouring the ride. This is more than a COVID novel � even if many of the situations will feel familiar to the reader � and like all good fiction, it drills down on what it means to be human; what it means to be humane. Spoilerish from here. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) How will they keep us in, I wonder, if we threaten to leave? Will they lock us in, and how ethical would that be? I will have both the vaccine and the virus, and I will stay. I could kid myself that I’m doing it to save the human race, but honestly? I’m doing it for the money. Neffy is a twenty-seven-year-old marine biologist, and out of a job and deeply in debt, she makes the desperate decision to volunteer for a vaccine trial as the Dropsy virus (much more contagious and lethal than COVID) spreads across the globe. Ten healthy young people have been sequestered in a lab with the understanding that they will be given an otherwise untested-on-humans vaccine followed by the virus itself, and if they survive, they’ll be given a huge (unspecified to the reader) payday. Neffy is made very sick by the injections, and when she comes out of her fever a week later, she discovers that the London outside the lab has not weathered the pandemic well, and as the four other test subjects still locked in with her were never given the vaccine or the virus before the lab staff ran away, they have to wonder if she is the only immune person in the world. And what would that fact mean for them as a group? Or the world? As they agree to wait out the quarantine period that they had signed on for (maybe there still is someone in charge out there who will come to rescue them), Neffy learns that one of the others has brought the prototype of a device (The Revisitor) that allows a person to become deeply immersed in their own memories. Much of the novel is made up of her trips to the past, and as we witness long scenes from Neffy’s childhood and later family life, we eventually learn the real impulse behind her volunteering for the trial. In the third narrative strand, Neffy writes a series of letters to “My Dear H� while in quarantine. These tell the story of her career as a marine biologist, and as she describes the lifelong connection she has felt to octopuses, it becomes clear how often she was uncomfortable performing experiments on them or even keeping them (bored and depressed) in captivity. These bits not only point out the irony of her own confinement (and the irony of her having access to a memory machine during a pandemic that erases memory), but will eventually answer the question of where her debt came from. “But don’t you think we can learn from the past? See things differently, or let it help us decide what we do in the future?� Neffy is a complex character, but the more we learn about her past, the more understandable her behaviour becomes; Fuller’s use of this three strand narrative works really well to maintain interest and organically answer questions the reader has about Neffy from the beginning � character, plot, and format get full marks. Although the debate about freedom and responsibility has been stirred up by the pandemic we all recently went through, I don’t know if The Memory of Animals truly brings anything new to the table. On the other hand, this was a very believable account of one young woman’s journey, well told, and I’m looking forward to reading more reviews from readers who are more familiar with Fuller’s work. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 21, 2023
|
Jan 23, 2023
|
Jan 21, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1552454584
| 9781552454589
| 1552454584
| 3.45
| 8,326
| Sep 27, 2022
| Sep 27, 2022
|
really liked it
| Morning. A newly birthing sun cracks through the trees and lances straight into his blazing red eyes. Baxter is a sleeping car porter. A sleepy car Morning. A newly birthing sun cracks through the trees and lances straight into his blazing red eyes. Baxter is a sleeping car porter. A sleepy car porter. A sleepy porter he is car. Car sleepy. Porter. Sleeping. He giggles. Winner of Canada’s richest literary award, the Giller Prize, The Sleeping Car Porter took me a while to warm up to. Part historical fiction, part social commentary � all told in a hallucinatory blur of visions and sexual longing and sci-fi fantasy � at first, it didn’t seem real enough to feel true. But as the stakes ramped up for the main character � a young gay Black man working in one of the few (potentially) well-paying fields open to him in 1929 Canada � I finally forged an emotional connection to the material, and by the end, the hallucinatory blur felt like the only way that author Suzette Mayr could have possibly allowed me to truly feel inside this character’s absurd existence. Happy to have read this and delighted it won the big prize. Hands reach toward him, grab at him for a lift up, grab his coat pocket, wave in his face. A sea swell of passengers, spilling toward his car; a maelstrom of departure-time panic. R. T. Baxter, a dentist-to-be, man who longs to lance gums and extract pathological third molars, standing, here, next to this train, caught in this hurricane. Drowsy already. From the first passage we’re told that Baxter � a Caribbean transplant to Canada, in search of a better life � has been saving his money for years to go to Dentistry school, and with less than a hundred dollars left to earn, he can’t wait to end his days as a sleeping car porter. We learn that this position entails being on-call twenty-four hours a day to well-off white folks who treat the Black porters like servants or worse (calling them all “boy� or "George", leaving awful messes for them to clean, demanding water or babysitting services in the middle of the night when one might catch a short nap), and a porter like Baxter must smile and obey every piddling order: not only does he earn the majority of his money through tips, but any complaint from a passenger (deserved or not) leads to demerits and too many demerits leads to firing. As Baxter prepares to leave on a run from Montreal to Vancouver � on the “fastest train on the continent� � he’s assigned a bunch of hard-to-please-looking passengers, and as he can only earn ten more demerits before he’s let go (and he’s oh so close with his savings!) it’s a mounting disaster for him when the train is stopped in the Rocky Mountains by a mudslide and the passengers want to hold him personally responsible for the delay. Layered onto this increasingly tense plot, Baxter’s sleep deprivation (made worse by the delay) leads to hallucinations that usually include teeth (based on some studying he’s already done with a found dental textbook), fairly graphic sexual (in language, not acts) memories/longings, and scenes right out of the science fiction novels he loves to read: Baxter read and reread his books and magazines about the deep sea and Martians and outer space and time travel and immortal beings and phantoms. He ate alone. He ironed his shirts. He shined his shoes so that they glittered like stars when he walked. He circled the planet Earth in his spaceship, he flew up high on the back of giant scarabs from Jupiter, he travelled the oceans in submarines. He rested in the cellar of his castle in his box of dirt, friends with vermin. He sat on his chair in the speeding train, his back perfectly straight, and he slept with his eyes open, hallucinations draping his face, a tittering insect instead of a heart. The dehumanising manner in which Baxter is treated by the passengers (and the railroad employing him) is both horrible and believable and I welcome historical fiction that asks us to confront such an ugly chapter from our past. And while at first I wasn’t sure if the sexual content fit in with the bigger picture � memories of cruising in parks and alleys, money slyly offered in a public washroom, pornography that demands to be examined again and again: is this what the grey-haired ladies who pick up every Giller winner are hoping to find between these covers? � I have to admit that being a gay Black immigrant in 1929 Canada is a big, challenging package that deserves to be examined in its entirety; just how was one expected to find love when it was against the law? Each facet of Baxter’s existence seems to be working against the fulfilment of his dreams and desires, and as the hours and days at a standstill drag on � as the passengers become angrier and Baxter becomes ever more delusional from sleep deprivation � I truly did feel empathy for his struggles; perhaps literally placing us in a fantasy world was the only way for Mayr to demonstrate how surreal our actual world can be. I’m glad I stuck with this after feeling lukewarm in the beginning, and again, I am pleased that Mayr has been celebrated for what she created here. � My aunt Arimenta, says Baxter, carefully � always used to say, Baxter, she’d say, hearts will never be practical until they can be made unbreakable. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 19, 2023
|
Jan 20, 2023
|
Jan 19, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1250278252
| 9781250278258
| 1250278252
| 3.75
| 148
| Mar 28, 2023
| Mar 28, 2023
|
really liked it
| What happens when we feel that something � or someone � is present to us, and yet we can’t say how? A silent figure. A visitor. An indefinable chan What happens when we feel that something � or someone � is present to us, and yet we can’t say how? A silent figure. A visitor. An indefinable change in feeling of a room. Something is there, unmistakably so. And try as we might, if someone asks how we know, we cannot explain it. We just know it. We just feel it. This is a felt presence. Author Ben Alderson-Day is a British research psychologist with an interest in auditory verbal hallucinations; and while the phenomenon of “hearing voices� can be linked to schizophrenia and other pathologies, not all those who have this experience (or who otherwise sense invisible presences) suffer from a diagnosable condition � Alderson-Day simply refers to his core research subjects as “voice-hearers�. Starting with those who report hearing disembodied voices, the author cast his net wider to interview and collect research on those who report seeing or feeling the physical presence of someone who is invisible to others, and this net is cast so widely that Presence: The Strange Science and True Stories of the Unseen Other includes the stories of everyone from epileptics and ultramarathoners to mediums and Bronies; and I was pretty much fascinated by all of it. Sections where Alderson-Day shares other’s research and theory can be a little dry, but this was more than made up for by the sections where the author engagingly reports his own thoughts and conversations. This was not exactly the book that I expected it to be, but I am not a bit disappointed by what it is. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) If you go looking for feelings of presence, the first stories you come across almost always involve snow. Lots and lots of snow. Blank expanses, extreme conditions, the enormity of nature � all seem to combine to conjure silent figures, as if some spaces appear tailor made for feelings of presence. It was an abiding interest in polar exploration stories that led me to picking up this book, and Alderson-Day does discuss Sir Ernest Shackleton’s famous experience of having been led by a mysterious “other� across South Georgia Island in search of rescue for his beleaguered crew (and as that interest had previously led me to reading John Geiger’s The Third Man Factor, I was unsurprised to see that Alderson-Day shares a few stories from that collection). But this isn’t just an amalgam of stories of guardian angels: from the theory that Robin Williams� suicide could be attributed to hallucinations tied to his Lewy Body Dementia, to sleep paralysis with menacing presences (or Exploding Head Syndrome!) and seeing scary ghosts (or SED: sensory experience of the dead), an encounter with a sensed presence isn’t necessarily benevolent. On the other hand, from meditating monks to tulpamancers to novelists, there are those who are able to use their minds to conjure wanted presences: At Durham, we have worked with a wide range of remarkable people, reporting some of the most unusual experiences you could put into words. Voices, visions, presences; psychosis, dissociation, trauma; spirits, telepathy, and demons. But we have never had to try to work with data as slippery as what we got from the Edinburgh writers. Appropriately enough, it wasn’t hard to feel like you were being spun a yarn sometimes. As a researcher, Alderson-Day uses these stories to try and understand the genesis of the broadly defined phenomenon of felt presence, and besides some general theories (it’s a body-based experience [a few different areas of the brain are referenced], it’s influenced by the process of mirroring and “coloured in� by expectation), but the most interesting thing to me was that the research is all so recent. We all get the feeling sometimes that we’re being watched when there’s no one there, we all hear our name whispered on the breeze � indeed, Alderson-Day writes that “we all occupy a space somewhere on a continuum of psychosis and we could in theory move up and down it� � yet we’re mostly uncomfortable admitting to hearing voices or feeling presences. It would seem that researchers are often surprised by how widespread these phenomena are because they tend to ask specific questions instead of allowing research subjects to freely describe their lived experiences; the most fascinating experiences come out when the subjects go off script ("Ooooh, I just left my body and floated above the table") and there’s a new research project, Psychosis Outside the Box, that’s attempting to elicit these types of responses. If nothing else, "felt presences" would seem to represent a common human experience that comes in a wide variety of forms: In trying to understand felt presence, I have heard about the visceral visitors of psychosis, the harbinger of ill health among Parkinson’s sufferers, the doppelgänger of an intoxicated playwright, and a robot that can conjure a ghost. I have listened to stories of saviors but also pursuers, a stormy voice that only visited in the calm, and fellow travelers who aren’t always expected. I have been told about evil personified, heard of animal confidantes, and even been offered a theory on how to create such presences myself. Again: I enjoyed the stories more than the theory (and perhaps mostly because Alderson-Day doesn’t have a settled theory to share), but I enjoyed the whole of this and am glad I picked it up. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 16, 2023
|
Jan 19, 2023
|
Jan 16, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1771621338
| 9781771621335
| 1771621338
| 4.50
| 3,782
| Oct 29, 2016
| Oct 29, 2016
|
it was amazing
| The words in this book are embers from the tribal fires that used to burn in our villages. They are embers from the spiritual fires burning in the The words in this book are embers from the tribal fires that used to burn in our villages. They are embers from the spiritual fires burning in the hearts, minds and souls of great writers on healing and love. They are embers from every story I have ever heard. They are embers from all the relationships that have sustained and defined me. They are heart songs. They are spirit songs. And, shared with you, they become honour songs for the ritual ways that spawned them. Bring these words into your life. Feel them. Sit with them. Use them. For this is the morning, excellent and fair� As dawn broke every morning, the late Ojibway author Richard Wagamese would light a candle, burn the four medicines (sage, cedar, sweetgrass, and tobacco), read widely from global spiritual traditions, and take some solitary time to meditate upon those readings; eventually journaling his learnings before getting down to the work of writing that was his “life and passion and career�. Collected here as Embers: One Ojibway’s Meditations, the learnings are grouped into several categories (Stillness, Harmony, Trust, etc.), with just one or two passages per page and many beautiful (stock) photographs. There is identifiable truth on every page of this collection � these are writings that speak soul to soul � and if I had one small complaint, it would be that grouping the meditations by category had the slightest feeling of repetition, but ultimately, truths glimpsed by slightly different angles are still truths and a gift to the reader. This is a collection I will return to again and again and my soul cannot give fewer than five stars. I could have shared something from every page, but here are a few samples: Stillness In this waking world, I am awakened. In this easing of shadow, I reclaim the light. I am not alone here. I sit with my ancestors, singing this day into being � and I am made more. Harmony It is love that brings us all together. This human family we are part of, this singular voice that is the accumulation of all voices raised together in praise of all Creation, this one heartbeat, this one drum, this one immaculate love that put us here together so that we could learn its primary teaching � that love is the energy of Creation, that it takes love to create love. Reverence There are times in your life you are flung into an undiscovered country of being, a place beyond time and tide and detail, the full magical breath of you heaving with the indescribable joy of being, and you realize then that parts of you exist in exile and completeness is journeying to bring them home. Joy I’m not here in this life to be well balanced or admired. I’m here to be an oddball, eccentric, different, wildly imaginative, creative, daring, curious, inventive and even a tad strange at times. I’m here to pray and chant and meditate and sing and find Creator in a blues riff, a sunrise, a touch or the laughter of children. I’m here to discover ME in all of that. I’m here to add clunky, chunky and funky bits of me to the swirls and swagger and churn of life and living. It demands I be authentic. So when you look out at the world, that’s me dancing in the fields� From sharing his processes to reaching out a hand in shared humanity to even those who have hurt him and his people, Wagamese was a writer of uncommon generosity. My soul wants to be dancing in the fields by his side � Dance, dang it, that's what feet are for! � unreservedly the highest recommendation. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 11, 2023
|
Jan 12, 2023
|
Jan 12, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1777221153
| 9781777221157
| 1777221153
| 4.50
| 50
| unknown
| Feb 20, 2023
|
really liked it
| The North doesn’t play favourites. According to author Tom Stewart, he hadn’t intended to write a sequel to Immortal Nort The North doesn’t play favourites. According to author Tom Stewart, he hadn’t intended to write a sequel to Immortal North, “Yet, here we are. The tale felt unfinished.� Immortal North Two begins within the heart-thumping final moments of the previous novel, and in chapters that alternate between the town and the woods, between the present and the past, following the tortured inner thoughts of a backwoods man who has apparently lost everything, we get a deeper understanding of “the trapper� and a deeper understanding of how loss and grief are navigated and processed. I didn’t know that I needed a sequel to this story, but I’m glad it exists and can whole-heartedly recommend the duology to any reader. (My thanks to the author for an Advanced Reading Copy; passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) When the trapper was young he was told a story of a mythical arrow shot from a mythical bow. For that arrow to reach its target, it had to cross half the distance. Then it had to halve that distance again. Then again, and so on. Of course that particular arrow never reaches its target because it never crosses all those infinite halves. How could it? That still made some sense to him. Turns out this arrow is not that arrow. A part of him was surprised. After a brief scene-setting bit of nature writing, we rejoin the trapper as an arrow � the broadhead so pretty and dazzling in its flight as it sliced through that spectrum of morning light � is coursing through the air towards him. Acts and their consequences propel the plot from there, but as ever, plot isn’t the most interesting part of a novel to me (although I will say that for those who enjoy a cracking good yarn, this one has plenty of snap; for those who enjoy a more emotional read, this has plenty of pull). The sections in the present day � following the trapper as he struggles to carry on � were compelling and believable; interwoven organically with ideas from philosophers ranging from Zeno to Frankl. I loved the concept of the big trapper and little trapper disagreeing within his mind, as well as the role that nature takes in his healing process. There are also some wonderful scenes set in the past: I particularly liked an epic poker game that once affected the fortunes of the trapper’s family and the tale of the trapper’s grandparents meeting at a country dance: Love was in the air and couples danced within it. Her thin hand in his. And from that clasp would come other life. Unbeknownst to them, where their palms met, roots sprouted. Small vines already curling out between their fingers. Stewart’s writing is filled with savoury metaphor and allusion and bits of wisdom, and I’ll share here a few tasty bits: � His eyes on the curled grey ashes in the stove, like the fire had eaten the bones but left the feathers. This sequel didn’t affect me quite as hard as the first novel did � probably because everything truly affecting had already occurred before this opens � but as an exploration of the consequences of those *cough* affecting events, this was really well done. And probably necessary. Again: I’m glad Immortal North Two exists and look forward to reading whatever the author comes out with next. And he was nine-tenths pain, and one-tenth pain, and some impossible fraction of hysterical love, ‘cause for the smallest wild part of him, some piece at once defiant to and accepting of the misery and cruelty of life, and any circumstance or force that would impose on him great suffering which might break his will and then break the man � this felt raw and that felt good. See his resolve in a tiny smile. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 09, 2023
|
Jan 10, 2023
|
Jan 09, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0192839470
| 9780192839473
| 0192839470
| 3.84
| 5,763
| 1872
| Oct 07, 1999
|
really liked it
| For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. 1 Corinthians 13:12 A For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. 1 Corinthians 13:12 As hinted at by the title given to this collection of strange stories, Sheridan Le Fanu was interested in writing about the mystical and metaphyiscal; those inexplicable horrors of shade and shadow that may only be fuzzily glimpsed by mortal man as though In a Glass Darkly. First published in 1872, my edition has an Introduction which compellingly explains that Le Fanu (a Dublin-born Protestant journalist with “an interest in Irish Nationalism�) often shaped his stories so that power-abusing upper class characters face some sort of comeuppance. And as a writer influenced by Swedenborg, Le Fanu was open to the idea that this retribution could come at the hands of actual spirits. As these stories unfold, it seems equally as scientifically possible for a middle-of-the-night pain in the chest to have been delivered by indigestion or vampire; the real delight is in following along to see how the cases unfold. I loved every bit of this. As food is taken in softly at the lips, and then brought under the teeth, as the tip of the little finger caught in a mill crank will draw in the hand, and the arm, and the whole body, so the miserable mortal who has once been caught firmly by the end of the finest fibre of his nerve, is drawn in and in, by the enormous machinery of hell, until he is as I am.~ Green Tea Published in 1871, fifteen or so years before the first Sherlock Holmes story, Green Tea shares many of the detectiving characteristics later employed by Holmes: an assistant who compiles his genius mentor’s notes into readable stories for the laypeople; an eye for evaluating a person upon first meeting (here, after a brief conversation with The Rev. Mr. Jennings, Dr. Hesselius asserts that he is a bachelor, he has drunk a good deal of green tea but has since given it up, and that his father has seen a ghost!); and the belief that there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for every mysterious circumstance. Coming before Holmes as this did, I couldn’t help but put myself in the mind of a reader in 1871: would that reader have been gobsmacked by Hesselius� feats of logic? Would that reader have been chilled by the gloomy Gothic setting and, even moreso, horrified by a vicar who is shadowed by a blaspheming demon (a monkey-shaped phantom with glowing red eyes and a penchant for perching on the Good Book in order to block the minister’s readings)? This was a truly surprising delight: I had no idea where this old story would go, nor could I have predicted Hesselius� solution. Loved this! "Well, then, Doctor, here is the last of my questions. You will, probably, laugh at it; but it must out nevertheless. Is there any disease, in all the range of human maladies, which would have the effect of perceptibly contracting the stature and the whole frame � causing the man to shrink in all his proportions, and yet to preserve his exact resemblance to himself in every particular � with the one exception, his height and bulk; any disease, mark � no matter how rare � how little believed in, generally � which could possibly result in producing such an effect?" ~The Familiar The Familiar begins with a prologue in which Hesselius writes to his aide that the ensuing case of a retired sea captain who suddenly finds himself pursued by a demon � recorded by a clergyman and forwarded to the doctor for analysis � is interesting, but beyond his abilities to diagnose as he had never met the captain himself. Breaking such cases into three categories � hallucinations, actual demonic possession, or a physical ailment that makes possible one of the other two possibilities � the reader is then primed to analyse Captain Barton’s case as it unfolds. And whether he is actually pursued by a demon, or if the figure is a manifestation stemming from his own guilty conscience, there is no denying that this is a man succumbing to harrowing terrors. This fellow took his pipe from his mouth on seeing the coach, stood up, and cut some solemn capers high on his beam, and shook a new rope in the air, crying with a voice high and distant as the caw of a raven hovering over a gibbet, "A rope for Judge Harbottle!" ~Mr. Justice Harbottle In a prologue before presenting another third party manuscript collected by Dr. Hesselius, it is noted that Hasselius has written in the margins that this seemed to be a case of (what we would today call) mass hysteria; that a person suffering from certain cases of “lunacy, of epilepsy, of catalepsy, and of mania� might establish “spirit-action� in one person, which then spreads to others around them. In this case: a haughty and corrupt hanging judge finds himself hauled up before an otherworldly High Court of Appeal. And while Harbottle’s frightening visions might be attributed to gout or guilt, how to explain the visions experienced by others in his household? It seemed on a sudden, as it came, that the darkness deepened, and a chill stole into the air around me. Suppose I were to disappear finally, like those other men whose stories I had listened to! Had I not been at all the pains that mortal could to obliterate every trace of my real proceedings, and to mislead everyone to whom I spoke as to the direction in which I had gone? This icy, snake-like thought stole through my mind, and was gone. ~The Room in the Dragon Volant At 120 pages, this novella-length story of a twisty and complicated con (with the inexplicable disappearances of they who stay in the corner room of the Dragon Volant inn outside Versailles) must have been mind-blowing in the day to readers who hadn’t seen this kind of storyline before; collected here by Dr. Hasselius in an essay on “Drugs of the Dark and the Middle Ages�, this is a story with a rational, rather than supernatural, explanation. If human testimony, taken with every care and solemnity, judicially, before commissions innumerable, each consisting of many members, all chosen for integrity and intelligence, and constituting reports more voluminous perhaps than exist upon any one other class of cases, is worth anything, it is difficult to deny, or even to doubt the existence of such a phenomenon as the Vampire. ~Carmilla Written in 1872, fifteen or so years before the first publication of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, this is a spooky tale of a charming young woman who is not as innocent as she would appear. This manuscript was written by a woman who had crossed paths with Carmilla in her youth and was collected by Dr. Hasselius, who noted in the margins that this tale, involves “not improbably, some of the profoundest arcana of our dual existence, and its intermediates�. My final thoughts: This was such an interesting collection, and mostly, because I kept wondering how a reader 150 years ago must have reacted to the material: it’s pretty tame � almost cliché � by today’s standards, but I was never unaware that Le Fanu got there first. Also: the appearance in Green Tea of the Holmesian Dr. Hasselius made me think that I was in for a whole collection of his stories, so it was a bit disappointing that he never physically appears again. Still, overall, a cracking good read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
Jan 08, 2023
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
144346516X
| 9781443465168
| 144346516X
| 3.86
| 1,500
| Sep 13, 2022
| Sep 13, 2022
|
liked it
| Your moshom never lied to me, but there were Cree legends he told me that I knew weren’t true, that represented something else. Like I know that Ca Your moshom never lied to me, but there were Cree legends he told me that I knew weren’t true, that represented something else. Like I know that Canada isn’t actually on the back of a turtle. I know that Wisakedjak didn’t create humans. He didn’t make mud out of dirt and water, mould that mud into a humanoid figure, dry it over fire, and breathe life into it. The theory of crows seemed equally tenuous, but provable, if you were to go to the place where you would be remembered. Centred on a Winnipeg-dwelling Cree family disconnected from their ancestral lands, The Theory of Crows is a universally relatable domestic drama. When a middle-aged man finds himself suffering with anxiety and depression, and walls himself off from his wife and teenage daughter, a personal tragedy will send the father and daughter on a dangerous trek back to those ancestral lands; seeking the soul medicine that can only be found there, held in the memory of the crows and in the memory stored in the land itself. I found much to like in this story � even if I found the line-by-line writing to be a bit clunky � and as this is the first adult novel released by celebrated children’s author David A. Robertson, it holds out the promise for even greater things ahead. Rounding down to three stars for the clunky bits I didn’t believe. Your grandfather used to say that you could remember the land, even if you’d never been on the land before. Your grandfather used to say that the land could remember you. It works the same way with crows, Hallelujah. They remembered him, they would remember me, and they remember you. They pass these things down through the generations. From a young age, Matthew was awe-struck by the enormity of the night sky, and a fear of the void could send him into a panic; a panic only his father � an Elder, an ordained minister, a trained counsellor � could calm. As he grew older, Matt began to rely on Xanax (“as required�, and he required quite a lot), and between the anxiety and the meds, he began to zombie his way through life, ignoring and disappointing his wife and daughter. That sixteen-year-old daughter Holly (named “Hallelujah� at birth for her miraculous existence) is beginning to act out in reaction to her father’s emotional absence, and to make matters worse, she’s beginning to experience panic attacks of her own. Although Matt and Holly are both vehemently non-spiritual � neither believing in God or following Indigenous ceremony � they are forced to rely on the ways and beliefs of the Cree if they hope to complete a fraught trip to their ancestral trapline in northern Manitoba. Robertson recently released a memoir, Black Water, which revolves around just such a trip he took with his own father, and in with the CBC, he explains how he used learnings from that trip to deal with his own mental health issues that were affecting his relationships with his family (and especially with his eldest daughter). As quoted in the interview, writing The Theory of Crows “was a way for me to continue to heal, because sharing truths through story is healing for me.� I commend Robertson for his bravery and candour in sharing the truth at the heart of this story, but again, it wasn’t an entirely successful novel for me. I’ll put an example of why behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[The scene where Holly and her friends are drinking and decide to test the local urban legend (will running around the church three times make Satan appear?) seemed like an interesting bit, but right from the beginning, I had a credibility issue: Would a Winnipeg-raised kid be thinking that “the snow was deep� if it was “up to her ankle�? And, OK, the snow was deeper around back, and they had been drinking, but would Holly the athlete not actually be able to circle the church more than twice? And even though it states that at least Charmaine did complete three laps, since Holly blacked out (I guess?) at some point, we never learn what Charmaine sees � I don’t think Charmaine appears in the rest of the book � and that made the whole scene pointless to me. (hide spoiler)] Regret covers everything. It’s like thick fog. It’s hard to see through. Your grandfather says that he doesn’t regret anything because you can’t change what happened. I don’t know if I believe him. I think we all wish that we could go back and do at least one thing over again…We can drown in regret. The first part of this story � showing the disconnection growing between Matt and his family and Holly’s rebellious reaction � was absolutely relatable and I believed that this was a real family. The second half � a father-daughter canoe trip into the unknown � was undeniably tense and adventuresome, and the fact that Matt and Holly were city-dwellers attempting to regain something of their indigenous heritage also made this half relatable: they had no special skills or knowledge to carry them through and the dangers were real. But because they were from this land, and the land did remember them, they experienced a type of healing � a soul medicine � that wouldn’t be available to the settler population, and there is magic in that. The story arc and many of the specific situations did work for me, but this loses stars for the clunky bits that didn’t. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 04, 2023
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593595270
| 9780593595275
| 0593595270
| 3.61
| 26,885
| Nov 10, 2011
| Apr 18, 2023
|
liked it
| When the Greek lesson is over, she walks the dark streets as she has always done. The vehicles on the road speed past daringly as they always do. M When the Greek lesson is over, she walks the dark streets as she has always done. The vehicles on the road speed past daringly as they always do. Motorbikes carrying midnight snacks in red metal boxes weave in and out of the traffic, ignoring both lanes and lights. Past drunks young or old, weary workers in skirt suits or short-sleeved shirts, elderly women staring blankly from the entrance of empty restaurants, she carries on walking. The first novel I read by Han Kang � International Booker winner The Vegetarian � was pretty much my idea of perfection: weird and affecting, equally engaging my heart and mind, it drew me in and taught me something of what it is to be a woman in modern-day South Korea. But Kang is no one-trick pony, no two of her books are quite alike, and while each of the novels I have read by her since has been undeniably well-written, none of them has quite sparked that original magic for me again. Greek Lessons is something new yet again � poetic and philosophical, it twines the stories of a woman who has unexpectedly lost the ability to speak with that of a man who is slowly losing his sight � and for the most part, I found the plot kind of predictable and bland; the two voices confusing in their interchangeability. I’m not disappointed to have read this � Kang’s sentences are delightful � and I’m rounding down to three stars as a rating against her earlier work. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms. Spoilerish from here.) “Are you okay, seonsaengnim?� asked the young woman with the curly hair and sweet eyes who sat at the very front of the class. The woman had tried to force a smile, but all that happened was that her eyelids spasmed for a while. Trembling lips pressed firmly together, she muttered to herself from somewhere deeper than her tongue and throat: It’s come back. For the second time in her life, “the woman� finds herself suddenly, physically, incapable of speaking; even the noises she makes breathing make her feel tense and nauseous. The first time this happened (as a teenager), she felt the dam burst during a French lesson and she regained the power of speech. This time � after the death of her mother and recently losing a custody battle for her son, then losing her job as a lecturer with the loss of her voice � she decides to take lessons in Ancient Greek at the community college; at least it fills a few of her empty hours even if there’s no quick miracle forthcoming. Interspersed with the woman’s tortured musings on her life and predicament (presented in an omniscient third-person POV) are scenes from the Greek teacher’s life, told in both first-person and second-person POVs as he intermittently mentally addresses the friend of his youth who had been his first (unrequited) love. Suffering a congenital eye disorder, he has always known that blindness was in his future, but perversely, not only has he refused to learn Braille, but he left his expat family in Germany to return to the Seoul of his childhood and attempt to live his dimming life on his own terms. There is something interesting in examining Ancient Greek (both the structure of the language itself and the philosophy and literature written in it) to draw metaphors for how meaning is defined and derived in modern life, but honestly, the plot arc of an emotionally needy mute woman and an increasingly helpless blind man stumbling into a relationship of mutual aid wasn’t very satisfying to me. Their stories twin and twine in the fine details, too (in a way that wasn’t to my liking), as when the man finds himself in inexplicable tears: There are times when my eyes burn and suddenly start to water; when these tears, which are but physiological, fail to stop for some reason, I quietly turn away from the road and wait for the moment to pass. And the woman finds herself incapable of tears despite her recent losses: She wipes her cheeks, dry as ever, with the back of her hand. If only she’d made a map of the route her tears used to take. If only she’d used a needle to engrave pinpricks, or even just traces of blood, over the route where the words used to flow. But, she mutters, from a place deeper than tongue and throat, that was too terrible a route. Rather than try to guess what the author means by all of this, I’ll let Kang herself explain by quoting from found on Korea.net: In "Greek Lessons," we are introduced to a man gradually losing his sight and a woman who suddenly loses her voice. In the man’s case, it feels as if he is a portrait of the universal everyman. Slowly losing the world of sight and enduring the human condition of the inevitable yet gradual approach of death are one and the same. During the process of mortality, we struggle against death even as our lives are being consumed. This is akin to speech and silence occurring simultaneously. Human consciousness always coexists with darkness, but our voices are heard most clearly in the blackest darkness. During this battle against mortality, our power of speech becomes ragged, and ultimately the female protagonist loses her voice entirely. I think that she could also be a portrait of us all. This opinion reflects my experience of working on Leave Now, the Wind is Blowing for over four years. At that time I became extremely sensitive to language. Rather than conceptual concerns about language, the sensual act of writing itself became unbearable to me. All the words I was using felt like they had become ragged, which pained me. I overcame most of that torment while writing "Greek Lessons." Reading Greek Lessons, it’s obvious that the author put much thought and craft into every word chosen � and I can see how another reader might gel precisely with this kind of thing � but it wasn’t quite to my own tastes (or, more unfairly, not to my expectations). I still look forward to reading whatever Kang comes up with next. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 2023
|
Jan 02, 2023
|
Jan 01, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1908745908
| 9781908745903
| 1908745908
| 3.91
| 52,736
| Aug 04, 2022
| Aug 04, 2022
|
really liked it
| Please do not get lost. If you haven’t had an Ear Check, don’t come here. Level Forty-Two will be open tomorrow. Come back then. Remember you have Please do not get lost. If you haven’t had an Ear Check, don’t come here. Level Forty-Two will be open tomorrow. Come back then. Remember you have seven moons. You must reach The Light before the last one rises. I just barely squeaked in reading 2022’s winner of the Booker Prize (it took so long to be released here in Canada), and while I can see how the themes and writing in The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida would have appealed to the Booker judges (and especially as its mordant tone in describing horrific political reality appears in other novels on this year’s shortlist), it wasn’t my personal favourite of this year’s list, nor even my favourite novel exploring Sri Lanka’s long years of deadly internal conflict (for that see Michael Ondaatje’s Anil’s Ghost). It might be unfair to author Shehan Karunatilaka for me to rate this fine novel in comparison to others instead of solely on its own merits, but that was the experience its winning the Booker imposed on me, so all this is simply meant to explain why my reaction might be a bit muted. Seven Moons is undeniably good, probably not great, and four stars is a rounding up Lankans can’t queue. Unless you define a queue as an amorphous curve with multiple entry points. This appears to be a gathering point for those with questions about their death. There are multiple counters and irate customers clamour over grills to shout abuse at the few behind the bars. The afterlife is a tax office and everyone wants their rebate. The year is 1990 and Sri Lankan war photographer Maali Almeida learns he is dead when he finds himself in the chaos of a bureaucratic office with only one sandal on his feet and his camera lens cracked and filled with mud. From a Helper, he learns that he has seven moons (days) to make his way to the Light or risk being trapped in the In Between forever. As he finds his bearings, Maali is determined to get a message to his roommates � his best friend Jaki and her male cousin DD; Maali’s secret gay lover � and have them release a stash of photographs that would have been too dangerous for him to share while still alive. There’s a mystery/thriller vibe to this novel as Maali strains to remember the details that led to his death, and while the clock ticks down those seven moons, Maali finds himself torn between obeying the Helper who is encouraging him to go the the Light and a more nebulous creature who promises Maali revenge upon those who had hurt him in life if he remains in the In Between. Throughout, Maali’s remembered experiences as a photojournalist in the �80s � one who was willing to work for any of the alphabet soup of factions who paid the best in the moment � allows Karunatilaka to describe horrific scenes from Sri Lanka’s Civil War; and as Maali was a resident of the capital city, Colombo, Karunatilaka is able to immerse us in its unsettled setting of systemic corruption, income disparity, and rolling curfews. I appreciated that Maali’s afterlife is populated with unfamiliar-to-me creatures from Sri Lankan lore and Buddhist belief. All of this was good stuff. On the other hand, I didn’t much care for the character of Maali himself: A gambling addict with Mommy issues and a self-described “slut�, I didn’t understand all the scenes of him being pleasured by pretty young men while holding conversations with other guys (not only was this meant to be blatantly provocative at the height of the AIDS scare while Maali assured DD that he was always faithful while on assignments, but as Karunatilaka thanked his wife during his Booker acceptance speech, I don’t think this was based on lived experience, and it kind of shows). Others have noted that this feels too long, and at nearly 400 pages, it really does; there is much repetition, and I don’t think it needed the gambling or Maali’s dramatic family of origin subplots. And as for the satiric tone, the vibe is more resigned than humourous: � The Afterlife is as confusing as the Before Death, the In Between is as arbitrary as the Down There. So we make up stories because we’re afraid of the dark. Ultimately, this does feel like an important read: any light shone on a government controlling and killing its own people deserves to be amplified and I appreciate the craft and passion that Karunatilaka brought to this project. I am happy to have squeaked this in before the end of the year, if only to end it contemplating the following: You think of dead lakes overflowing with corpses, of police stations where the rich lock up the poor, of palaces where those who follow orders torture those who refuse to. You think of distraught lovers, abandoned friends and absent parents. Of lapsed treaties and photographs that are seen and forgotten, regardless of the walls they hang on. How the world will go on without you and will forget you were even here. You think of the mother, the old man and the dog, of the things you did, or failed to do, for the ones you loved. You think about evil causes and about worthy ones. That the chances of violence ending violence are one in nothing, one in nada, one in squat. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 29, 2022
|
Dec 30, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
3.89
| 75
| unknown
| Feb 27, 2023
|
really liked it
| This I have come to believe: when a boat goes down, it’s only the shell of things � the hull and the bodies � that vanish. When there are no surviv This I have come to believe: when a boat goes down, it’s only the shell of things � the hull and the bodies � that vanish. When there are no survivors and no meaningful recovery of wreckage, there’s only speculation, the barest possibility of ever knowing what happened, and the legacies of unresolved grief. The absence of the dead shapes the story of the living. Some memoirs satisfy with their uncommon tales, some satisfy with their thoughtful analysis of the common human story, and every once in a while, I discover a memoir that combines each of these elements with beautiful language and I find myself moved and enlightened in a way that it would be hard for a novel to match. Set Adrift is one such rare gem: Sarah Conover was a toddler when she and her sister were orphaned by a family yachting accident, and as her grandparents, in particular, were persons of note in the community, Conover is able to explore both the public record of their disappearance and her own private struggle with growing up � always feeling like as an orphan � in the middle of a large and broken family. I was fascinated by everything here � Conover shares much about her situation that was surprising to me � and I am enlarged by having learned of her journey to wholeness. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) For years, I blithely summarized the accident and its aftermath in careless shorthand to others: My parents, Lori and Larry Conover, grandparents, Harvey and Dorothy Conover, as well as family friend Bill Fluegelman, drowned during a freak storm in the Bermuda Triangle. My parents left behind two young orphans � my sister Aileen, almost three at the time, and me, eighteen months old. People would look to me for some clue as to how I felt but would find little in my affect to guide them. I’d been schooled in dissociation and numbness: no Conover ever spoke of the perishing. None of my parents� generation could bear this cataclysmic break in their lives. The Conovers were an uncommonly experienced boating family: Sarah’s grandfather, Harry Conover, was a competitive sailor for over fifty-five years (rated among the top dozen ocean-racing yachtsmen of his time, he “collected a lot of silverware�), he spent time as the Commodore of the Cruising Club of America, and made his fortune co-founding a publishing company that put out Yachting Magazine (among other titles). So when his highly admired yacht, the Revonoc, disappeared in a freak squall on the short jaunt from the Florida Keys to Miami on January 1, 1958, it sparked a vast search and rescue operation that was covered in the national news. No sign of the yacht or its wreckage � other than its dinghy, which washed ashore on a relative's beach � would ever be found. Because this was such a high-profile disappearance, Conover is able to quote from sources as varied as Sports Illustrated and the official Coast Guard reports (including the government’s official stance on the Bermuda Triangle itself: perfectly explainable factors can cause sudden storms), and I found everything about exploring the mysterious disappearance to be highly interesting. What is an orphan’s story if she has no memory of her origins? Say the word aloud: or-phan. The mouth warms and wombs the first syllable, or, possessing it momentarily. Then, teeth against the bottom lip while squeezing the diaphragm hard. Phan. The word pushes into the surrounding emptiness, landing nowhere. On a more personal level, Conover describes how she and her sister were adopted into her father’s sister’s family � a decision that would be challenged for years by her maternal grandmother � and the chaos that this unleashed in her aunt’s family. Despite genuine love and maternal concern from their adoptive mother (and from their new father, too, until that marriage dissolved under the strain), Sarah in particular felt like an orphan her entire life; and especially because her grandmother always insisted that she didn’t belong with the Conovers anymore. But through a love of nature, a spiritual embrace of Buddhism, and continuing education (that would lead to an MFA in Creative Writing), Conover was eventually able to make sense of her journey and find a way to “unstory� her life as an orphan. We become the people we think we are � that’s why stories can be dangerous and even self-defeating. Other people can also become who we think they are and that’s why stories can be disastrous. We can’t help but use stories to connect, but beware, stories will use us. They did me, that is, until they didn’t. Simply the perfect blend of interesting facts and heart-felt introspection; a novel could not do better at capturing what it means to be human. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 26, 2022
|
Sep 27, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||||
1989555802
| 9781989555804
| 1989555802
| 3.05
| 57
| unknown
| Nov 09, 2022
|
really liked it
| Shortly before midnight Bruno Perzenowski and Heinrich Busch climbed up the thirteen steps. Once there, Branchaud led each man, his final stride pl Shortly before midnight Bruno Perzenowski and Heinrich Busch climbed up the thirteen steps. Once there, Branchaud led each man, his final stride placing him above one of the two steel trapdoors. As December 17 ended and the new day began, the hangman still waited, but no telegram arrived with a reprieve. At 12:10 a.m., the hangman with practiced hand “pinion[ed] their legs, dropped the hoods [over their faces], adjusted the ropes and pulled the lever.� Twenty minutes later, Perzenowski’s and Busch’s bodies were cut down, examined by the coroner, pronounced dead, and carried directly to the common grave they had been forced to dig the previous day. At 12:45, Walter Wolf and Willy Müeller were executed. Their bodies too were brought to the common grave. The child murderer, Donald Sherman Staley, was hanged at 1: 30 p.m., bringing an end to what would be the last mass hanging in Canadian history. Hanged in Medicine Hat is a book I requested more or less on a whim � I spent my teenaged years on the “bald prairies� of Southern Alberta without ever hearing the story of the Nazi POW camp that once was there, let alone the story of the last mass execution in Canadian history, so my interest was piqued � and historian Nathan Greenfield’s account is well-researched, well-told, and presents a nuanced question: In the immediate aftermath of WWII, what should justice have looked like in the handling of unrepentant Nazis who killed some of their own “within the wires� of Medicine Hat’s Camp 132? (tl;dr: we blew it.) Full of fascinating details, shining a light on a near-forgotten episode in Canadian history, what’s not to like? Opened early in 1943 and representing a sizeable increase in employment and economic activity for the city, Camp 132 was welcomed by Hatters. That the prisoners were available for farm labour and the occasional hockey game only made their presence more welcome. The locals treated the captives with courtesy, and their manners were reciprocated. The existence of Camp 132 was as positive an experience as could be expected for both sides, except for the shocking killings of Private August Plaszek in 1943 and Sergeant Dr. Karl Lehmann a year later. Along with the interesting history behind how German POWs (including members of Rommel’s Afrika Korps, surrendered to British troops) ended up in Medicine Hat, Alberta, I was fascinated to learn that, because Canada had signed the Geneva Convention, not only did these POWs receive 3500 calories a day (most prisoners would gain fifteen pounds over the course of their detainment), but they would have complete control of their own leadership and policing (which meant senior Nazis and the Gestapo ran the show within the camp). With coded messages and a secret radio bringing orders straight from Berlin, the POWs remained under German military command, and as the Russians marched on their capital and things began to look dire in the Fatherland, any POW who whispered that Germany might lose the war could be accused of treason and risk being dealt with by military tribunal. So when prisoners were found murdered within Camp 132 � and the Canadian government decided to treat it as a civil matter and subject the perpetrators to our civil justice system � was that a miscarriage of justice? Should the Germans, per the Geneva Convention, have had the right to administer punishment according to their own military rules? This is the crux of Hanged in Medicine Hat and with the presentation of court transcripts, newspaper articles, and interviews with eyewitnesses, Greenfield makes a persuasive case that the Canadian government didn’t have the right to bring these men to civil trial, let alone subject them to capital punishment. The government’s intention and the appeals court’s decisions may have settled the matter in 1946 but they do not do so today. The violation of the Geneva Convention and the War Measures Act may seem to be technical legal points. They are not. For, by trying the POWs in civilian court, Canadian authorities deprived them of something vitally important: jurors of their peers, that is jurors who understood military ethos. On the other hand: I was telling my family about this story over dinner last night and both my husband (an old conservative) and my daughter (a young progressive) said that the Nazis murdered within the camp and the Nazis hanged for their crimes were simply fewer Nazis in the world and they couldn’t get worked up about their deaths. I tried to explain that Greenfield presented some of the POWs as radicalised youth who had never known another way of life (which I thought might sway my daughter’s stance, but she just said it was less likely someone like that could be reformed after the war), and while at least one of the hanged men went to his death calling out, “My Führer, I follow thee�, Greenfield didn’t believe any of them deserved the death penalty (and especially not as the consequence of a civil trial). Perhaps it takes a book length explanation to be persuaded by Greenfield’s position (as I was), but at any rate, I found the whole thing utterly fascinating. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 20, 2022
|
Aug 22, 2022
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0525520333
| 9780525520337
| 0525520333
| 3.17
| 8,452
| Dec 06, 2022
| Dec 06, 2022
|
liked it
| Everyone knows this is a dangerous business, but, between you and me, being a woman is a dangerous business, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwis Everyone knows this is a dangerous business, but, between you and me, being a woman is a dangerous business, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. Oh, those men would talk about how they fight Indians and wrestle cattle and climb the masts and look for justice, and indeed they do, but they do it for themselves, if you ask me. And what they want of women, they want for themselves, too. The best part of A Dangerous Business is the historical setting � 1851 Monterey � and Jane Smiley masterfully captures the landscape and the buildings and the weather; peopling the town with all sorts of interesting carpetbaggers and fortune-seekers. The weaker (and more dominant) part of the book is a rather uncompelling murder mystery, from the perspective of a naive (absolutely uneducated and unworldly) young woman who stumbles into sex work (which she finds acceptable and liberating) after the death of her awful husband. The tone � for a detective story set in the lawless West of saloons, ranchos, and brothels � is weirdly sedate, and the mystery itself didn’t satisfy me, but I can appreciate that Smiley was going for something beyond genre fiction here; it just didn’t add up to much for me. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) When the first of “the girls� disappeared, no one thought a thing of it. Folks disappeared from Monterey all the time, mostly because there was more going on in San Francisco, or even San Jose. Or people took their families and moved down the coast because they thought they would find better hunting there, or some land with more rain. If they were lucky, they came back, gave up on the idea of owning their own farms or ranches, and went to work the way everyone else worked. In fact, Eliza knew that her mother would say that she had disappeared, and that thought was a bit of a prickle to her conscience, but not enough to get her to answer those letters her mother had sent. She thought there was a lot to be said for disappearing, and so she didn’t think much of the disappearance of that girl, except to note the day, May 14, her very own birthday. Twenty-one now, and wasn’t that strange? At 18, Eliza Ripple was married off to an older man by her Congregationalist parents (if only to prevent her from running off with the handsome Irish labourer she was making eyes at), and after carrying her off to California in search of his fortune (and spending the brief months of their marriage demanding much of her in both the kitchen and the bedroom), this Peter was shot in a barroom brawl and Eliza spent no time mourning his death. When a local Madam offered her employment, Eliza shrugged and set to work, and as she describes it here, it was not unpleasant to spent time with one or two men each evening, knowing that the customers were vetted in advance by Mrs Parks and that Carlos the bouncer sat on a chair outside her ajar door; these men were certainly nicer, cleaner, and less demanding than Peter had been and the money that Eliza earned afforded her perfect independence. In her free time, Eliza liked to stroll the streets of Monterey, and eventually, she made the acquaintance of another free-spirited sex worker, Jean: a cross-dressing lesbian who worked at an establishment that catered only to women (and that did kind of blow my mind: did such a place really exist in 1851 Monterey? At any rate, I appreciated the way that Eliza wasn’t shocked to learn of it; why wouldn’t an overworked housewife want a place to go for gentle comfort and release?) What started with Jean sharing and discussing books with Eliza (and in particular, the writings of Edgar Allen Poe) led to the two friends employing the detective skills described in "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" when fellow sex workers start to go missing and the local Sheriff doesn’t seem to care. That’s pretty much the set up, which was fine, but the execution didn’t do much for me. On the one hand, I essentially liked that the characters talked about books (if one doesn’t mind them giving away the endings to Poe’s stories), but on the other, it irked me that once Jean corrected Eliza’s French pronunciation of the detective’s name (Dupin is pronounced DuPANN not DuPINN), every time Eliza wonders what the detective would make of something the name she says or thinks is written “DuPANN�. Like, beyond irked every time I saw it. And so many threads just went nowhere: Jean can see ghosts, but they don’t affect anything; Eliza is obsessed by horses (always asking to see someone’s horse or peeking through a fence at horses or wondering whatever happened to a dead woman’s horses), but that doesn’t have any relevance to the plot; Eliza sometimes feels bad about losing contact with her parents, but it doesn’t ultimately matter; Eliza notes this man’s unusual appearance, had an unsettling experience at that man’s house, holds a suspicion that Mrs Parks knows more than she's letting on, and none of it matters or even rises to the level of a red herring � there are simply skeins of loose threads that don’t get tied up. And Eliza’s unworldliness (but eagerness to learn) was more annoying than charming to me: She has one of her seafaring customers explain to her what the equator is (and later makes a connection when another client is talking about degrees of latitude); she asks a gentleman if he believes there really will be a (Civil) war, and his answer (most certainly) isn’t very edifying (to her or to me); she agrees with her employer that women agitating for the vote are probably wasting their time � historical details felt tacked on instead of enriching. And when the climax to the mystery came, it was neither surprising or exciting. Brutes! As soon as a man sees a rule, he strives to flout it, whether he sees it in the Bible or a constitution. That prohibition runs around in his head, and he can’t stop it. Then there he is, transgressing, and you ask him why, and he says that something was unfair or he was provoked, but what he really means is that he kept having thoughts, and then those had to turn into action, and he could not stop them. The idea of a serial killer targeting sex workers in nineteenth century Monterey, while other sex workers try to find and stop the murderer, is an intriguing concept, and this last passage about men’s justification for brutality � whether a husband abusing his wife, a killer presumably “cleansing� the streets of immorality, or plantation owners enslaving others � captures the underlying philosophy of the book: life at the time was a dangerous business, and especially for women, but women working together could mitigate some of that danger. There’s an interesting morsel to chew over at the heart of that, so while I did find this an often quiet, sometimes irksome, read in the details, the overall experience wasn’t entirely without merit. Three noncommittal stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 23, 2022
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
Nov 23, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0307269000
| 9780307269003
| 0307269000
| 3.85
| 21,161
| Dec 06, 2022
| Dec 06, 2022
|
You committed yourself here. You committed yourself here. Presented as a “coda� to Cormac McCarthy’s The Passenger, Stella Maris contains the transcripts of seven therapy sessions between a psychiatrist and Alicia Western; the genius mathematician sister of the main character in The Passenger; a troubled young woman whose eventual fate is described in the previous novel’s first few pages. Whereas The Passenger only had generalised passages about math and physics, Stella Maris features a deeper dive into mathematical thinkers and their work � with a particular focus on Alicia’s speciality in topography � and as it is entirely presented in dialogue, this reads as a Socratic investigation into the nature of reality (and our inability to translate what we unconsciously intuit into communicable language, whether verbal or mathematical.) I did enjoy this as a followup to The Passenger � and if the math references were going over my head, they were going over Dr Cohen’s, too, and he asked for clarification where necessary � but even more so than with the previous novel, this feels a bit like a vanity/legacy project; as though McCarthy just wanted to put the summation of his life’s thinking into print without feeling particularly indebted to novelistic expectations. As a completionist, I am delighted to have read this, but this is going to be one of those rare occasions upon which I will not assign a rating; this feels outside the scope of such things. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) The problem with the unknowable absolute is that if you could actually say something about it it wouldn’t be the unknowable absolute anymore. You can get from the noumenal to the phenomenal without stirring from your chair. In other words, nothing can be excerpted from the absolute without being rendered perceptual. Bearing in mind that to claim reality for what is unknowable is already to speak in tongues. The trouble with the perfect and objective world � Kant’s or anybody’s � is that it is unknowable by definition. I love physics but I don’t confuse it with absolute reality. It is our reality. Mathematical ideas have a considerable shelflife. Do they exist in the absolute? How is that possible? I said to myself. But then myself became another self. No more than right. It took the math with it. The idea. A long period of uncertainty. When I recohered I was someplace else. As if I had escaped my own lightcone. Into what used to be called the absolute elsewhere. As a senior fellow at , Cormac McCarthy has long been incubating his ideas about the world in conversation with a cross-disciplinary assemblage of other deep thinkers. In 2017, he published his first nonfiction essay � � in Nautilus magazine, and many of the facts and ideas from the essay pop up in Stella Maris. I appreciate McCarthy’s use of the Socratic format to present and debate these ideas � the psychiatrist/patient dialogue was perfectly suited as a fictional framework � and there’s just enough plot tie-in with The Passenger to warrant reading this to complement Alicia’s brother’s story. I don’t think I would call this a complete and satisfying novel on its own � “coda� does seem about right � but again, I did find considerable value in it. I look unhappy? Tougher mettle is called for I suppose. I’m all right. For a long time I’ve suspected that we might be simply incapable of imagining the epochal evils of which we stand rightly accused and I thought it at least a possibility that the structure of reality itself harbors something like the forms of which our sordid history is only a pale reflection. I thought that it was something Plato might have considered but could in no way bring himself to express. I see by your look that you have at last beheld the very incubation of lunacy. I am happy that this duology exists as a summation of McCarthy’s thought and craft � I know of no other living author who writes at this level � but I think it needs to be read in the context of his entire oeuvre; Stella Maris certainly needs to be read in concert with The Passenger, or if one wanted to mainline the ideas, The Kekulé Problem is complete unto itself. And again: If McCarthy’s main thesis entails the futility of expressing sensed truths in communicable language, I beg patience for my clumsy words. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 13, 2022
|
Nov 15, 2022
|
Nov 13, 2022
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||
0241454409
| 9780241454404
| 0241454409
| 3.96
| 12,578
| May 10, 2022
| Jan 22, 2022
|
liked it
| I am not a pessimist or an optimist, I am a scientist. There is no agenda in understanding how the world really works. How the World Really Works could I am not a pessimist or an optimist, I am a scientist. There is no agenda in understanding how the world really works. How the World Really Works could be considered the capstone to Vaclav Smil’s impressive career in interdisciplinary research and analysis: having written over 40 books and 500 papers, he is considered “the� world-leading expert on energy (amongst other topics), and this current book attempts to synthesise and present what he knows to be fact in a world of increasing polarisation and misinformation. There was much that I found interesting here � so much about the functioning of our material world (from energy, container shipping, and food production, to the noninevitability of globalisation and the curiously out-of-touch human perception of risk) that I have accepted without examining � but I couldn’t help but be turned off by Smil’s frequently smug and superior tone (accented with snide asides and exclamation marks!) I liked that Smil positioned himself between the eco-doomsayers and the techno-optimists � calling that the rational middleground as we humans have never been good at predicting the future � but while I enjoyed the factoids, I’m still annoyed by the tone; my three stars are a refusal to take a stand on this book. Inevitably, this book � the product of my life’s work, and written for the layperson � is a continuation of my long-lasting quest to understand the basic realities of the biosphere, history, and the world we have created. And it also does, yet again, what I have been steadfastly doing for decades: it strongly advocates for moving away from extreme views. Recent (and increasingly strident or increasingly giddy) advocates of such positions will be disappointed: this is not the place to find either laments about the world ending in 2030 or an infatuation with astonishingly transformative powers of artificial intelligence arriving sooner than we think. Instead, this book tries to provide a foundation for a more measured and necessarily agnostic perspective. I hope that my rational, matter-of-fact approach will help readers to understand how the world really works, and what our chances are of seeing it offer better prospects to the coming generations. Right from the start, Smil stresses that decarbonising the economy (giving up fossil fuels) is a near-term impossibility because of the way our world is built (not to mention the staggering amounts of fossil fuels that go into, for instance, the manufacture and transport of a single wind turbine; not to mention the fact that he doesn’t believe there is an alternative to jet fuel for long distance flight; not to mention that Germany decommissioned their nuclear power plants and spent billions on solar technology that has eased their fossil fuel consumption by a percentage point or two.) A major thrust of the book concerns what Smill refers to as the four pillars of the modern world and he records that in 2019, we collectively consumed 4.5 billion tons of cement, 1.8 billion tons of steel, 370 million tons of plastics, and 150 million tons of ammonia. He makes the case that each of these essential consumables could not easily (if ever) be replaced by a more eco-friendly alternative, and as each of them requires massive amounts of fossil fuels for their production, he explains: Global production of these four indispensable materials claims about 17 percent of the world’s primary energy supply, and 25 percent of all CO� emissions originating in the combustion of fossil fuels � and currently there are no commercially available and readily deployable mass-scale alternatives to displace these established processes. Smil reports that the global annual demand for fossil carbon is around 10 billion tons, and while affluent economies (including China) give lip service to reducing consumption, it is reasonable to expect emerging economies (especially those in India and Africa) to ramp up their consumption in order to provide their citizens with the benefits of modern materials (as in the hygienic benefits of cement floors or the use of nitrogen-rich fertilisers to improve crop yields). Smil does make it clear that he’s not denying the ill effects of our carbonised economy, but he stresses that catastrophists calling for “net zero by whatever year� can’t will it into being without addressing how the world really works; this doesn’t come down to individuals giving up gas-fuelled cars and abandoning the suburbs (which are the kind of decisions that are ours to make, but which have an incredibly negligible effect on the big picture.) An example of Smil snarking on the eco-catastrophists: Some prophecies claim that we might only have about a decade left to avert a global catastrophe, and in January 2020 Greta Thunberg went as far as to specify just eight years. Just a few months later, the president of the UN’s General Assembly gave us 11 years to avert a complete social collapse whereupon the planet will be simultaneously burning (suffering unquenchable summer-long fires) and inundated with water (via a rapid sea-level rise). But, nihil novi sub sole: in 1989, another high UN official said that “government have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control,� which means that by now we must be quite beyond the beyond, and that our very existence might be only a matter of Borgesian imagination. I am convinced that we could do without this continuing flood of never-less-than-worrisome and too-often-quite-frightening predictions. How helpful is it to be told every day that the world is coming to an end in 2050 or even 2030? And snarking on the techno-utopians Crises expose realities and strip away obfuscation and misdirection. The response of the affluent world to COVID-19 deserves a single ironic comment: Homo deus indeed! And, after making some good points about how, even forty years ago (despite having microchips and container ships, understanding the greenhouse effect) no one could have predicted the world we are living in today (and especially the offshoring of jobs that led to both rust belt America and the economic surge of China) Smil snarks on the futility of making predictions at all: In the past, this tendency toward dichotomy was often described as the clash of catastrophists and cornucopians, but these labels appear to be too timid to reflect the recent extreme polarization of sentiments. And this polarization has been accompanied by a greater propensity for dated quantitative forecasts. You see them everywhere, from cars (worldwide sales of electric passenger vehicles will reach 65 million by 2040) and carbon (the EU will have net-zero carbon emissions by 2037). Or so we’re told. In reality, most of these forecasts are no better than simple guesses: any number for 2050 obtained by a computer model primed with dubious assumptions � or, even worse, by a politically expedient decision � has a very brief shelf life. My advice: if you would like a better understanding of what the future may look like, avoid these new-age dated prophecies entirely, or use them primarily as evidence of prevailing expectations and biases. Again: Smil does write, “There is something new as we look ahead, that unmistakably increasing (albeit not unanimous) conviction that, of all the risks we face, global climate change is the one that needs to be tackled most urgently and effectively.� And it would seem that this entire book exists to make the point that decarbonising the economy would take a global accord to fundamentally change the way that our world actually works � at great cost to people alive today who probably won’t live to reap the benefits � and that both the eco-doomsayers and the techno-optimists are a distraction from actual reality. And, admittedly, this was worth wading through the snark to arrive at. Being agnostic about the distant future means being honest: we have to admit the limits of our understanding, approach all planetary challenges with humility, and recognize that advances, setbacks, and failures will all continue to be a part of our evolution and that there can be no assurance of (however defined) ultimate success, no arrival at any singularity � but, as long as we use our accumulated understanding with determination and perseverance, there will also not be an early end of days. The future will emerge from our accomplishments and failures, and while we might be clever (and lucky) enough to foresee some of its forms and features, the whole remains elusive even when looking just a generation ahead....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 05, 2022
|
Nov 09, 2022
|
Nov 09, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
4.45
| 1,285,706
| Aug 09, 2022
| Aug 09, 2022
|
really liked it
| I’m in the ICU with my dying mother and the thing that I’m sure will get her to wake up is the fact that in the days since Mom’s been hospitalized, I’m in the ICU with my dying mother and the thing that I’m sure will get her to wake up is the fact that in the days since Mom’s been hospitalized, my fear and sadness have morphed into the perfect anorexia-motivation cocktail and, finally, I have achieved Mom’s current goal weight for me. Eighty-nine pounds. I’m so sure this fact will work that I lean all the way back in my chair and pompously cross my legs. I wait for her to come to. And wait. And wait. Although Jennette McCurdy might not be pleased to hear it, I picked up I’m Glad My Mom Died because 1) My kids were fans of iCarly and I was peripherally aware of who she is, and 2) I noted the hub-bub around this memoir and wanted to know what that was about. And I can see why this has caught fire: Contrary to her most famous character’s persona of a wise-cracking tough kid, young Jennette was a scared, manipulated, mentally abused child of the ultimate controlling Stage Mother; and to the extent that the details of her childhood were undeniably repelling, I can imagine that anyone who grew up watching Sam Puckett beat up bullies would have their minds blown to learn what was actually running through her tortured mind on set. As for me: I was shocked to learn the details of this unhappy childhood � if not shocked to read that it sucks to be a child actor, and especially if it is to live out someone else’s dream � but I was engaged by McCurdy’s voice and evolving tone (ie, when she writes of being a very young child, she reports how she viewed her mother at that time, not through the lens of later wisdom; as she ages, the tone becomes more knowing) and there was recognisable craft to that. So, while this doesn’t read like the most polished memoir, I applaud McCurdy’s strength and candour and hope that her (eventually happy) story can serve as inspiration to those who resonate with it. I’m happy to have read this, if only to join the cultural moment, and McCurdy can rest easier knowing that if I saw her on the street, I would never yell “fried chicken� at her or ask to see her buttersock (and never before knew that these were things that people do to her; what a stupid price for fame). I’m more convinced than ever that I need to quit acting. That it doesn’t serve my mental or emotional health. That it’s been destructive to both. I think about what else has been destructive to my mental and emotional health…the eating disorders, of course, and the alcohol issues. And then I realize that, as much as I’m convinced that I need to quit these things � acting, bulimia, alcohol � I don’t think that I can. As much as I resent them, in a strange way they define me. They are my identity. Maybe that’s why I resent them. From growing up in a hoarder house (Jennette and her three brothers slept on trifold mats in the living room because their bedrooms were stuffed with garbage), experiencing poverty (despite her father working two jobs and her live-in maternal grandparents both working, the McCurdys were always behind on bills), and living with a mother obsessed with having survived breast cancer (the kids were forced to weekly watch a video of their mother singing them lullabies when she thought that she was dying), young Jennette learned to tame the chaos of her homelife by monitoring her mother’s moods and trying to always keep her happy. So when her mom suggested that she should start acting when she was six � something her mom had wanted to do as a child but her own parents wouldn’t allow � Jennette couldn’t say no, despite crippling discomfort and anxiety. Every move that Jennette made from that point was aimed at satisfying her mother’s ambitions (and alleviating the family’s poverty), and despite creepy/abusive behaviours at home (her mother insisted on showering Jennette, sometimes with her teenaged brother, until she was seventeen; her mother taught her “calorie restriction� and encouraged anorexia; her mother disowned her when paparazzi caught Jennette with a boyfriend [while writing in the same email that they needed money to replace a broken fridge]), Jennette put so much pressure on herself to do the thing she hated most (play Sam on iCarly) that she ended up punishing herself with eating disorders, alcohol abuse, negative self-talk, and codependent relationships; punishments that continued even after her mother eventually did die of cancer. While the details of Jennette’s early life are the stuff of pathos (she includes many more details than I’ve listed here), it’s perhaps even sadder to watch her � outwardly living a life envied by millions � spend years trying to shed her mother’s impossible (and manipulative) expectations. I had put her up on a pedestal, and I know how detrimental that pedestal was to my well-being and life. That pedestal kept me stuck, emotionally stunted, living in fear, dependent, in a near constant state of emotional pain and without the tools to even identify that pain let alone deal with it. My mom didn’t deserve her pedestal. She was a narcissist. She refused to admit she had any problems, despite how destructive those problems were to our entire family. My mom emotionally, mentally, and physically abused me in ways that will forever impact me. Most of the cover blurbs call this memoir funny, but it’s more quietly snarky-ironic than comedic. (McCurdy writes: There’s something about inherently dramatic moments that makes eye contact during those moments feel even more weighty and dramatic. It’s a hat on a hat. There’s enough drama here as it is. We’re good.) The blurbs also call this honest and compassionate and that’s where the best stuff is: this is the story of a survivor and I wish Ms McCurdy all the best. My mom didn't get better. But I will....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 26, 2022
|
Oct 27, 2022
|
Oct 26, 2022
|
ebook
| ||||||||||||||||||
0451495144
| 9780451495143
| 0451495144
| 4.27
| 50,190
| Nov 27, 2019
| Feb 07, 2023
|
really liked it
| He took Gaspar’s face in his hands, leaned down to look him in the eyes, and caressed his hair, the box on the ground between them, and he said, yo He took Gaspar’s face in his hands, leaned down to look him in the eyes, and caressed his hair, the box on the ground between them, and he said, you have something of mine, I passed on something of me to you, and hopefully it isn’t cursed, I don’t know if I can leave you something that isn’t dirty, that isn’t dark, our share of night. I haven’t read Mariana EnrÃquez before, so I went into Our Share of Night with no knowledge beyond her reputation for literary weirdness. I knew that this was technically a horror story (that cover!), and while it is that â€� with some seriously sick characters and graphic violence â€� I didn’t know that it’s also a savvy metaphor for the tumultuous recent history of EnrÃquez’s Argentina â€� with some seriously sick characters and graphic violence â€� and while it did feel overlong (my kindle app puts it at a thirteen hour read), it also felt like that length was making commentary on the banality and omnipresence of evil. I winced and harrumphed and sighed my way through this â€� and then I winced again, sighed some more â€� and any read that makes me feel so much, even so much negative, is worth four stars in my opinion (and especially when those negative feelings gave me a sense of EnrÃquez’s truth). (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) It was easy to get out of the city on a Sunday morning in January. Before he knew it the tall buildings were behind them, and then so were the low houses and tin lean-tos of the shantytowns on the city’s outskirts. And suddenly the trees of the countryside appeared. Gaspar was asleep by then, and Juan’s arm burned in the sun just like any regular father’s on a weekend of pools and picnics. But he wasn’t a regular father, and people could tell just by looking into his eyes or by talking to him for a while. Somehow, they recognized the danger: he couldn’t hide what he was. It wasn’t possible to hide something like that, at least not for long. As the novel begins, it is 1981, Juan’s wife has been dead for six months, and he is taking their six-year-old son to visit his inlaws at their estate in the country. Hints are given that this is not a normal father-son relationship, and when they finally reach the estate after a couple of side trips, we see the full horror of what young Gaspar is heir to (kind of The Master and Margarita meets Rosemary’s Baby). An interlude from 1983 follows, and then there is another long section â€� set in Buenos Aires from 1985-86 â€� that sees Juan treat his son with both tenderness and brutality as his own health begins to fail, and as this section is from Gaspar’s POV, and he has been shielded from the reality of his family situation, his spooky adventures with his friends feels like a cross between It and House of Leaves. The next long section rewinds to Juan’s childhood and covers the years from 1960-76 (view spoiler)[describing how he was discovered as a Medium by a member of the Order, bought from his family and exploited to commune with the Darkness, transforming into a monster who can lead the way to immortality (hide spoiler)], introducing Gaspar’s mother and explaining how her relationship with Juan developed (and including some cool scenes set in Swinging London). There follows an interlude set in 1993 â€� in which a journalist is investigating a mass grave tied to a conflict between the Liberation Army and the Argentine army â€� and while this section ties the novel to its actual historical setting, the journalist will stumble upon some of the supernatural truths as well. Finally, the last long section â€� set in La Plata from 1987-97 â€� follows Gaspar as he grows from teenager to man, finding his place in the city’s art and punk scenes, discovering some of his own hidden talents, and watching as he retraces his childhood trip to his grandparentsâ€� estate in search of answers (and while Gaspar and his family are not vampires in any sense, I got a real Interview with the Vampire vibe from this section.) Without wanting to give too much away, this is admittedly a lot of plot â€� this could easily have been sectioned off into a trilogy â€� but what really matters with Our Share of Night is how the supernatural events shine a light on Argentina’s actual history: Florence didn’t tolerate that kind of rebellion. She had rocks tied to the woman’s feet, and she was thrown into the Paraná River. Let her join the many dead hidden along Argentine river bottoms. The dictatorship’s crimes were very useful to the Order, providing it with bodies, alibis, and currents of pain and fear â€� emotions that were easily manipulated. It’s easy to imagine foreigners with hard cash becoming insanely rich with massive yerba mate plantations â€� essentially using slave and child labour to bring in the crops, cosying up to a corrupt government and using the army as personal security â€� so EnrÃquez’s tale of generations of one such family of powerbrokers, who use their riches in an occult quest for immortality (isn’t that what billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel are up to anyway?), make for perfect boogeymen. The quest for power everlasting push humans to the most heinous acts: Is there a real difference between a government disappearing dissenters and a mysterious sect hiding in a collapsed tunnel? A box full of human eyelids is unsettling in fiction, but is it more unsettling than learning that former Argentine president Juan Perón’s hands were, in fact, severed and stolen from his dead body despite his being “the most surveilled cadaver in the countryâ€�? I totally get what EnrÃquez was going for here, and as a political metaphor, this was an excellent read. Ghosts are real. And the ones who come aren’t always the one you’ve called. And on the other hand, if you’re looking for a ghost story, this feels long and often dull; punctuated by incredibly horrific scenes; perhaps, if you’re unlucky, too much like real life. Now I’m looking forward to EnrÃquez’s short fiction. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 19, 2022
|
Oct 25, 2022
|
Oct 19, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0393867811
| 9780393867817
| 0393867811
| 4.06
| 2,480
| Jan 17, 2023
| Jan 17, 2023
|
liked it
| On its surface the constancy of women’s place in society is depressing, but the thing about social constructs is that they are just that � construc On its surface the constancy of women’s place in society is depressing, but the thing about social constructs is that they are just that � constructs. Fundamentally if we have created these strictures, then we can deconstruct them and make new ones. Seeing the past and rejecting it allows us to imagine new futures and make the changes that are necessary to create a more equitable world. It’s time to start constructing that different future. Medievalist Eleanor Janega (with an MA in Mediaeval Studies and a PhD in History) states that her intent is to look to the past in order to understand our present, and hopefully, to construct a future that sees more equality between the sexes. In The Once and Future Sex, Janega primarily focusses on how the people of power and influence in the Middle Ages regarded women in four broad categories � how their weird bodies worked, ideals of beauty, fears of their sexuality, what work they did outside the home � and while this book is loaded with frequent quotes and citations, it didn’t really add up to a cohesive thesis to me. I enjoyed the factoids, I liked the often ironic tone, I appreciate the intent, but I seem to be missing the throughline; I don’t know that these facts from the past explain women’s place in modern society. Certainly not a waste of my time � there is much of interest to be found here � I’m simply left wanting. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) One way or another, though, when we consider the way women are conceptualized in the global north, we can ultimately start laying the blame back to the ancient Athenians. They have a lot to answer for. It’s always interesting to note that the Renaissance began with a few monarchs rediscovering the “Classics� and monasteries then teaching boys to read and write ancient Greek and Latin. This led to society taking as a given that the ancients (Plato, Aristotle, Galen, and Hippocrates) had human biology figured out with their humours theory, “Men were seen as hot and dry, or naturally sanguine and socially useful. Women, in contrast, were cold and wet and therefore more likely to be phlegmatic, or placid.� This combined with the Judeo-Christian origin story � Adam was made in God’s image (ie. the standard model) and Eve was formed (with inside-out genitals) from Adam’s superfluous rib (making woman the less god-like variant) � were the two theories that underpinned the “science� of how women’s bodies work. As for how those bodies should look: All in all, medieval society spent a long time concocting a beauty ideal for women that was possible only for wealthy women to live up to, and then furiously policing it when commoners tried to emulate it. At every opportunity women were told that they must be beautiful, and that that made them desirable, lovable, and holy. However, attempting to live up to this rigid standard, especially if one was poor, was called sinful and at times was illegal. The Church thrust women into an impossible quandary: If they were not born with looks that accorded with the beauty standard, should they lose status and perhaps remain single? Or should they use subterfuge to get closer to that exacting standard, even if it meant they might face an eternity in Hell? Janega writes that the Classics � while noting the beauty of various goddesses, mythical creatures, even Helen of Troy � don’t actually describe what that beauty looks like. It isn’t until the sixth-century that elegiac poet Maximianus (who linked himself to the classical tradition through his Etruscan lineage) wrote the first such description, saying that the ideal woman had: Golden hair, downcast milky neck, ingenious features to make more of her face; black eyebrows, free forehead, bright skin and little swollen lips. Maximianus and his poetry were used to teach Latin in the mediaeval period, and his idea of beauty was reinforced by those who would later pen guides to composing poetry: Matthew of Vendôme (twelfth century) in his The Art of the Versemaker and Geoffrey of Vinsauf (fl. 1200) in Poetry Nova. And apparently this societal conditioning is the entire reason why gentlemen prefer blondes? Janega notes that the most damaging aspect of this beauty ideal is that it was impossible for poor women to attain (peasants working the fields are unlikely to have a “milky neck�), and for those who might turn to cosmetics to attain the standard, both the Church � who equated makeup with the Whore of Babylon riding the seven-headed beast into the Apocalypse � and the continuing belief in humour theory � it was apparently verboten for a woman to depilate because a whiskery chin signalled a poisoned womb to potential partners � made it clear that a woman was supposed to be naturally beautiful, but also modest and chaste. And speaking of sex: To be honest, the likelihood that medieval women inserted live fish into their vaginas and then fed them to their husbands was probably low. It cannot be ruled out, but all in all it seems unlikely, no matter how lacking their sex lives might have been. However, actual practice mattered less than the fact that Burchard found such behavior plausible and enough of a worry that he advised clergy members to interrogate female parishioners about it. The idea that women were horny enough to suffocate a fish in their genitals if it meant more and better sex was one thing. It was another that they were willing to do occult magic and endanger their soul. Thinking at the time was that women wanted sex more than their weary partners (for reasons relating to humour theory and Christian fear of women’s strange bodies) and this led to the Malleus Malificarum (Hammer of Witches) written by Church inquisitor Heinrich Kramer (ca. 1430� 1505): a guide for rooting out all the lusty witches consorting with the devil to sate their unnatural needs. Janega contrasts this to the tropes of today � the randy husband begging his frigid wife for sex � but she doesn’t really explain how this flip occurred. Her last section is on women’s work outside the home, and while she writes that we think of this as a recent phenomenon, she stresses that this was the case even in mediaeval times: Women have always been a part of the world’s economy writ large. In fact, women’s work in the premodern world is generally ubiquitous. The idea that women largely existed in a domestic bubble wholly removed from the realities of labor and work would have seemed laughable to medieval people. In all classes of society, women worked and were expected to do so. From peasants and other outdoor labourers to ladies-in-waiting; brewers and bakers and laundresses; from sex workers to those who took Holy Orders, Janega describes all of the roles that women played in the mediaeval economy…but this hardly felt like new information. While the information that Janega shares about these jobs was all interesting, I couldn’t really see how it relates to society today. And that is the point: “Society� hasn’t been made out of whole cloth � every belief about the differences in the sexes has been passed down from earlier times and a more equitable future begins with deconstructing those beliefs. I get that. I just didn’t really get that from this book. Still an interesting read overall. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 18, 2022
|
Oct 20, 2022
|
Oct 18, 2022
|
Hardcover
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
![]() |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.85
|
really liked it
|
Jan 29, 2023
|
Jan 30, 2023
|
||||||
3.28
|
really liked it
|
Jan 25, 2023
|
Jan 25, 2023
|
||||||
3.71
|
really liked it
|
Feb 02, 2023
|
Jan 24, 2023
|
||||||
3.59
|
really liked it
|
Jan 23, 2023
|
Jan 21, 2023
|
||||||
3.45
|
really liked it
|
Jan 20, 2023
|
Jan 19, 2023
|
||||||
3.75
|
really liked it
|
Jan 19, 2023
|
Jan 16, 2023
|
||||||
4.50
|
it was amazing
|
Jan 12, 2023
|
Jan 12, 2023
|
||||||
4.50
|
really liked it
|
Jan 10, 2023
|
Jan 09, 2023
|
||||||
3.84
|
really liked it
|
Jan 08, 2023
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
||||||
3.86
|
liked it
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
Jan 05, 2023
|
||||||
3.61
|
liked it
|
Jan 02, 2023
|
Jan 01, 2023
|
||||||
3.91
|
really liked it
|
Dec 30, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
||||||
3.89
|
really liked it
|
Sep 27, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
||||||
3.05
|
really liked it
|
Aug 22, 2022
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
||||||
3.17
|
liked it
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
Nov 23, 2022
|
||||||
3.85
|
Nov 15, 2022
|
Nov 13, 2022
|
|||||||
3.96
|
liked it
|
Nov 09, 2022
|
Nov 09, 2022
|
||||||
4.45
|
really liked it
|
Oct 27, 2022
|
Oct 26, 2022
|
||||||
4.27
|
really liked it
|
Oct 25, 2022
|
Oct 19, 2022
|
||||||
4.06
|
liked it
|
Oct 20, 2022
|
Oct 18, 2022
|