|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1915365066
| 9781915365064
| B09T4PTCY1
| 3.33
| 39
| unknown
| Mar 28, 2022
|
liked it
| I sat in the easy chair. “Aftab,� I said, “would you like to join me for a cup of tea?� My anxiety did not respond. I waited a while, picturing its I sat in the easy chair. “Aftab,� I said, “would you like to join me for a cup of tea?� My anxiety did not respond. I waited a while, picturing its face. It had an egg-shaped head and small, dark eyes on the sides rather than at the front. A long, slim nose and a narrow mouth beneath. Its skin was pale and smooth, except for a wrinkled frown on its brow and more wrinkles around both eyes that made it appear older than it should. Perfectly bald, it had no facial hair or eyebrows either. “Aftab,� I repeated. Still, my anxiety did not come out to meet me. What a perfectly moody read: Two Lumps of Sugar for Mr Anxiety follows a fifty-year-old British man, Jed, in the aftermath of his lonely old mother’s death � as he realises that he could have treated his Mum better; that he could have treated his wife and children better over the years, too � and as he grows to despise his job, Jed decides to take a three month contract in India; for the extravagant salary and the break from his incessant daily grind. But while Jed might think he can run away from his problems, some of those problems insist on being acknowledged; even if they need to take physical form and watch Jed while he sleeps, and follow along with him to the office, and join him in endless cups of tea. As a narrative of one man’s slow slide into anxiety and despair, author Eli Wilde has written an affecting account of a mind turning back on itself, but this is also an entertaining book filled with dark humour and witty characters. Perfectly moody and touching and sharp; three and a half stars rounded down, but definitely recommended. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I continued to read, despite the Thing. No, not despite the Thing. I had a word for the Thing now. Anxiety. Naming my tormentor didn’t make things any easier. Maybe that would change if I found out more about the condition. In the Acknowledgements at the end, Wilde notes that he “found both Claire Weekes and Barry McDonagh immensely helpful in my battle against anxiety when I was working in India,� and that explains not only why Jed employs tips from these real-life experts as he deals with his own mounting anxiety, but also explains why Jed’s experience � with mental health and with working in India � has the definite ring of truth. Everything from noting that the pale, egg-headed “Mr Anxiety� (AKA “Aftab�) looks like he could have been drawn by Russian illustrator Anton Semenov (Semenov created “Other People’s Secrets�, used as the cover art for this novel) and that Aftab speaks in the voice of Stephen Fry, to the descriptions of Indian beaches and traffic and street beggars (who might be grifters or might be lepers; more info on leprosy is provided at the end), all root this fantastic-sounding tale in the real world; one with real pain. As for the title, by way of Barry McDonagh’s philosophy of Dare: if anxiety is hiding in the shadows and taking jabs at your well-being, invite it to show itself � join you for a cup of tea, even � and invite it to do its worst; you never know what it might be trying to tell you: I held onto him tightly, as his body wracked with the force of his sobs. After a moment, I wept too. If I had looked deep into myself, I would have known why, but I didn’t. I didn’t want to face the thing I had kept hidden since the first day I came to India. Much of this really worked for me � the details, the tone, the characters � but something just missed in the plot for me (maybe it felt too true: like, a person can move to India for a three month contract and have interesting interactions with coworkers from around the world in real life, but in a novel, there needs to be a narrative reason for all of this. And I will, as ever, acknowledge that I have a particular narrative taste that isn't universal; this will certainly be a five star read to others.) Merged review: I sat in the easy chair. “Aftab,� I said, “would you like to join me for a cup of tea?� My anxiety did not respond. I waited a while, picturing its face. It had an egg-shaped head and small, dark eyes on the sides rather than at the front. A long, slim nose and a narrow mouth beneath. Its skin was pale and smooth, except for a wrinkled frown on its brow and more wrinkles around both eyes that made it appear older than it should. Perfectly bald, it had no facial hair or eyebrows either. “Aftab,� I repeated. Still, my anxiety did not come out to meet me. What a perfectly moody read: Two Lumps of Sugar for Mr Anxiety follows a fifty-year-old British man, Jed, in the aftermath of his lonely old mother’s death � as he realises that he could have treated his Mum better; that he could have treated his wife and children better over the years, too � and as he grows to despise his job, Jed decides to take a three month contract in India; for the extravagant salary and the break from his incessant daily grind. But while Jed might think he can run away from his problems, some of those problems insist on being acknowledged; even if they need to take physical form and watch Jed while he sleeps, and follow along with him to the office, and join him in endless cups of tea. As a narrative of one man’s slow slide into anxiety and despair, author Eli Wilde has written an affecting account of a mind turning back on itself, but this is also an entertaining book filled with dark humour and witty characters. Perfectly moody and touching and sharp; three and a half stars rounded down, but definitely recommended. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I continued to read, despite the Thing. No, not despite the Thing. I had a word for the Thing now. Anxiety. Naming my tormentor didn’t make things any easier. Maybe that would change if I found out more about the condition. In the Acknowledgements at the end, Wilde notes that he “found both Claire Weekes and Barry McDonagh immensely helpful in my battle against anxiety when I was working in India,� and that explains not only why Jed employs tips from these real-life experts as he deals with his own mounting anxiety, but also explains why Jed’s experience � with mental health and with working in India � has the definite ring of truth. Everything from noting that the pale, egg-headed “Mr Anxiety� (AKA “Aftab�) looks like he could have been drawn by Russian illustrator Anton Semenov (Semenov created “Other People’s Secrets�, used as the cover art for this novel) and that Aftab speaks in the voice of Stephen Fry, to the descriptions of Indian beaches and traffic and street beggars (who might be grifters or might be lepers; more info on leprosy is provided at the end), all root this fantastic-sounding tale in the real world; one with real pain. As for the title, by way of Barry McDonagh’s philosophy of Dare: if anxiety is hiding in the shadows and taking jabs at your well-being, invite it to show itself � join you for a cup of tea, even � and invite it to do its worst; you never know what it might be trying to tell you: I held onto him tightly, as his body wracked with the force of his sobs. After a moment, I wept too. If I had looked deep into myself, I would have known why, but I didn’t. I didn’t want to face the thing I had kept hidden since the first day I came to India. Much of this really worked for me � the details, the tone, the characters � but something just missed in the plot for me (maybe it felt too true: like, a person can move to India for a three month contract and have interesting interactions with coworkers from around the world in real life, but in a novel, there needs to be a narrative reason for all of this. And I will, as ever, acknowledge that I have a particular narrative taste that isn't universal; this will certainly be a five star read to others.) ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Mar 07, 2022
not set
|
Mar 08, 2022
not set
|
Sep 20, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1476785112
| 9781476785110
| 1476785112
| 3.74
| 58,177
| May 07, 2024
| May 07, 2024
|
liked it
| She wished that Rosella and Larry were coming now and not weeks away. She wished her mother would let her talk about them. But she barely let herse She wished that Rosella and Larry were coming now and not weeks away. She wished her mother would let her talk about them. But she barely let herself think about what she wished for most � that she were not in her mother’s living room trying to write a letter, hearing her mother move with difficulty in the room upstairs, but rather at home, waking to the soft light of early summer that appeared through the curtains of her bedroom on Long Island. I hadn’t previously read Colm Tóibín’s hugely popular Brooklyn (although I thought I had), but even so, there’s enough backstory recapped in Long Island that I was never lost or confused; it’s just that straightforward. Mostly plot-forward, Tóibín isn’t heavy on dialogue or setting (I love an Irish storyteller, but this could have honestly been set anywhere), and the characters are for the most part self-interested and unlikeable, keeping secrets, telling lies, and always running other people’s statements through their minds trying to see what kind of game they’re playing (and while there might be the shine of truth in that � especially when dealing with difficult family members � it makes for exhausting reading.) As a story, I thought this was fine: I assume it’s a bridging step between Brooklyn and the conclusion of Eilis Lacey’s adventures, and while the middle of a trilogy is often underwhelming, I spent a few pleasant hours with this book without ultimately leaving impressed. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) When the doorbell rang, Eilis stood up lazily, presuming that it was one of Larry’s cousins calling for him to come and play. However, from the hallway, she made out the silhouette of a grown man through the frosted glass of the door. Until he called out her name, it did not occur to her that this was the man Francesca had mentioned. She opened the door. Set twenty years after the end of Brooklyn, Eilis lives with her husband, Tony, and their teenage children, Rosella and Larry, on a quite cul-de-sac whose only other residents are Tony’s extended Italian family; the matriarch Francesca watching and controlling everything from behind her kitchen’s cafe curtains. When a man comes to Eilis� door to deliver life-changing news, Francesca arranges a response behind the scenes that sidelines Eilis� agency, so she decides to grasp some power over her life and spend the summer back home in Ireland, taking the kids with her. Once back in the village of Enniscorthy � and in the home of her own watching and controlling mother � Eilis mostly avoids the gossip-mongering locals (everyone is whispering about how she can afford a fancy rental car for weeks, she’s not going to let them know about her troubles back home), and when she does run into old friends, Eilis is careful not to share too much (which leads to Eilis� insouciant disruption of other people’s lives, as her own had been disrupted.) The questions unasked and unanswered, the omissions and lies, gossip and game-playing � Eilis is just one of many characters with hidden agendas and their interactions were consistently frustrating: Eilis appeared puzzled, as though she hadn’t heard him properly. But he knew not to repeat the question; instead, he should give her time to take it in. He kept his eyes on her and let the silence linger. She didn’t move at all. He wondered if she was thinking about something else or if she was working out how to reply. He began to count the seconds as they went by, until he got to a hundred and then two hundred. He could feel that his own face was burned from the midday sun at Cush. But Eilis’s colour had not changed. She was pale. She looked around the room and then directly at him. He sensed that his question still hung in the air and then it became obvious that she wasn’t going to answer it. Again: I understand that this is a middle volume of the “Eilis Lacey Series�, and without having read the first volume, I didn’t get the pleasure of catching up with beloved old characters, so my underwhelmed response is only to Long Island as a standalone. I will say: if the next volume promises a clash of titans between Francesca Fiorello and Mrs Lacey, as hinted at in this book’s ending, I wouldn’t miss it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 29, 2024
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1668010909
| 9781668010907
| 1668010909
| 3.80
| 1,865
| Jul 16, 2024
| Jul 16, 2024
|
really liked it
| This is the genius of Judy Blume. It’s the single most important aspect of her legacy. Her work as a children’s writer did something nobody else co This is the genius of Judy Blume. It’s the single most important aspect of her legacy. Her work as a children’s writer did something nobody else could manage: it helped ensure feminism’s longevity…A movement requires a multigenerational buy-in to maintain its momentum. And over in suburban New Jersey, a soft-spoken stay-at-home mom was listening. Writing cutting-edge books for kids, Judy Blume became the Second Wave’s secret weapon. There are several biographies of Judy Blume out there � most written thirty or more years ago � and author Rachelle Bergstein quotes from all of them. But what makes The Genius of Judy a special read is the way that Bergstein, with the benefit of looking back across the intervening decades and their shifting social and political climates, is able to give us the context in which Blume filled her literary niche and was able to positively influence countless young readers. From S. E. Hinton’s The Outsiders paving the way for more realistic young adult fiction to Erica Jong’s Fear of Flying giving voice to the modern woman’s existential malaise, Bergstein sets Blume in her cultural moment, explaining what a necessary force her books were for allowing girls to understand and take control of their own bodies. That’s no small thing; it’s everything, and it’s somehow under threat again today. The Genius of Judy traces Blume’s releases � sharing the stories of their inspiration, their plotlines, and reception � while also giving us the story of Blume’s life throughout the years; from unfulfilled suburban housewife to free speech activist. As a Gen X woman, Blume’s novels were hugely influential in forming my own outlook, and I have to admit, I took her for granted: I never once considered that for me to read these books, someone out there had to be thinking deeply on what was needed and taking risks to get them published. I truly appreciate the context that Bergstein supplies here and that I had the opportunity to revisit, and better understand, these formative reads from my youth. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Are You There God?, Deenie, and Forever form a triptych, with eleven-year-old Margaret, thirteen-year-old Deenie, and seventeen-year-old Katherine creating a progressive portrait of the new American girl. All three are smart, spunky, and in touch with their bodies. They’re all white, middle class, and from the suburbs � Judy wrote what she knew � but together, they embody an ideal for Blume that transcended race or class. The trio offers a vision of how the up-and-coming generation could digest the feminist and sexual revolutions. They’re good girls with a twist; they’re all in touch with sexuality, but they have futures. Those three novels were hugely influential to me as a girl in the late 70s, and mostly because I read each of them, years apart, at the exact right time � I needed the information and was ready to absorb it � and I remember that something about reading them felt transgressive; as though I was uncovering secret information about my body (how shameful!) that had been actively hidden from me. But I wasn’t reading Judy Blume anymore in the 80s (I never have picked up her adult novels; I think I want to preserve my memories of Blume in an unexamined amber of nostalgia) and I was oblivious to the periodic, and ongoing, bans that her novels have been subject to since then. Bergstein tells a fascinating story of those who have attempted to remove novels from schools and public libraries � from the Reagan era Moral Majority to Florida governor Ron DeSantis � and Blume’s efforts, in conjunction with the National Coalition Against Censorship, to keep not only her own novels but other often often-banned books (Slaughterhouse-Five, Catcher in the Rye, etc.) available to those who want them. Whether or not you’ve been reading Judy Blume, she’s been fighting behind the scenes to promote feminism and fight censorship. In the end, Bergstein acknowledges that Blume’s books have fallen out of fashion � even the 2023 theatrical release of an adaptation of Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret is a nostalgic blast from the past � and she laments that despite the YA book market exploding with lots of frank and explicit material (Forever, which shook teenaged me, is so sweet in retrospect), there’s something essential in Blume’s novels that is missing in today's cultural landscape: What’s still missing from a lot of contemporary sex ed is an exploration of the way sex intersects with relationships, experts say. Even today, very few parents and educators are prepared to discuss the way dynamics of care and safety and vulnerability all contribute to true intimacy, which is crucial for a satisfying love life. That’s what Judy innately understood how to do. She taught us about our bodies and our hearts through her stories. Periods are something that happens to a whole friend group. First teenage love affects the entire family. Boys experience heartbreak, too! Truly safe intercourse requires talking and planning. You can’t go back to holding hands. I’m so glad I read this book: I am delighted to have both learned so much more about Judy Blume’s true legacy and to have had this journey back to my own younger self; in so many ways, Judy Blume set key stones in the foundation of who I am and I hope that the young readers of today find their way to similarly good, foundational material. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
080216353X
| 9780802163530
| 080216353X
| 3.01
| 76
| Sep 17, 2024
| Sep 17, 2024
|
really liked it
| A woman who cannot, or will not, accept the conditions of her servitude naturally and gracefully, deserves what has happened to me. A woman who cannot, or will not, accept the conditions of her servitude naturally and gracefully, deserves what has happened to me. The publisher’s blurb describes Will Self’s Elaine as “Perhaps the first work of auto-oedipal fiction� as it is a heavily novelised treatment of the private diaries of Self’s own mother, Elaine. (Brief research shows that Self has a brother and was raised in London, whereas the “Billy� in this novel is an only child, raised in Ithaca, New York, etc.; this is not straight auto-fiction.) I don’t normally love when a male author writes from the female POV � and particularly in a case like this where gender-based power imbalance is the main focus � but with access to his mother’s diaries and a front row seat to her life, Self has more than usual insight into his “character’s� psyche (and the case could be made that perhaps he approaches his mother’s story with an outsider’s objectivity that has allowed him to explore her life with something like clinical detachment unavailable to other women?) Ultimately: this is a compelling story of a 1950s American housewife, thwarted in her own ambitions and suffering mental illness, who isn’t quite emotionally stable enough to endure the swinging parties of her husband’s Ivy League faculty crowd without humiliation. With elevated language, intimate psychological exploration, and unusual literary devices, Self is an obvious master of his craft; and with a mother whose story is at once both unique in its details and broadly typical of its time, this is a novel that feels both revelatory and necessary. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms. ALSO: I usually put my quoteblocks in italics, but here I present them as found because Self’s use of italics is too integral to the novel for me to mess with.) Her hysteria is mounting � and as Evelyn Tate’s screen door snaps shut, Elaine says it a third time: Can it be . . . that the acme of success . . . for me . . . is being able . . . to do my job as a housekeeper? Each phrase is separated by a troubled gasp � but it doesn’t matter how fast she babbles or deeply she breathes, the panic has the better of her: I’m going to collapse, she thinks, then be swept up into the sky with my goddamn nightie up around my shoulders . . . The last anyone will ever see of me is the first anyone did: my bare behind, waiting to be smacked. Suffering from migraines and panic attacks and unresolved childhood trauma, Elaine Hancock routinely relies on her husband, John, to help care for both her and their nine-year-old son, Billy; but as even Elaine’s former therapist noted that John and Billy’s relationship was “unusually close�, Elaine is often made to feel both chained to and surplus to their family arrangement. Dreaming of being an author, Elaine fills her time alone by writing stories in her secret notebooks; but as she can tell that her writing is “worthless and banal�, Elaine burns her fiction, only hanging on to her diaries, filled with secrets and schedules and sexual fantasies. And these are sexed-up times: Between feeling disgust at her husband’s clumsy overtures and like a second-tier prize at Cornell faculty parties (where folks swap spouses for slow dances and drunken necking), Elaine is ripe to fall hard for the manly new Sociology professor when he and his glamorous wife both join the faculty; a crush that will not end well. Spanning the period of about a year, with Elaine thinking back on earlier episodes from her life, this novel explores all of the ways that society, and Elaine’s own mental fragility, conspired against her fulfilment and happiness. That’s the plot, but as for the format, the most striking feature is Self’s use of italics: Dressed in slacks and a sweater she descends . . . she descends, dressed in slacks and a sweater � in sweater and slacks dressed, she descends: each thought corresponds to a word or words, right? Mix ’em up and you get a wordy sorta salad, like the mess in my head . . . In a recent(ish) interview with , Self explains that although he is a Professor of Modern Thought at Brunel University in west London, he has stopped teaching literature because, “I cannot find students that are capable of understanding what literary influence is. They simply haven’t read enough and don’t have the [required] fine grain of understanding.� So at the risk of demonstrating my own failings, I’ll share that whenever I saw these paragraphs that contain italics, I assumed they were references to other sources. I recognised some references to Steinbeck and Shakespeare, The Odyssey is gestured to beyond the setting of Ithaca, Paradise Lost beyond it being the focus of Elaine’s husband’s academic career; I felt clever when I recognised Venus in Furs. But I didn’t recognise most of the italicised bits, and while some phrases like “bitter as the cud� prove to be from poems a better read person might know (Wilson Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est), phrases like “red and scummy patches in a stainless steel kidney dish� and “a chill cold blast of sunlight� don’t have any google results. Are they simply all phrases from Elaine’s diaries, the “wordy sorta salad� that made a “mess� in her head? Whether they were the results of her own reading and study or original phrasing, that’s what I decided to go with, and it did serve to make Elaine an even more intriguing character. Having studied under the poet Ted Roethke, discussed writing with Nabokov and Bellow at faculty events, and serving an invaluable role as transcriptionist and editor for her husband’s academic writing throughout her marriage, Elaine is understandably frustrated to be entirely judged (even by herself) by her competence as a housekeeper. Yes, she’d been unhappy � upset, often, as well. But in those far-off days of a fortnight ago, with her complaisant old man, her girlish crush on his colleague, and her catty best friend, Elaine had been a goddamn poster girl for the Modern American Woman: posed in her kitchen, skirts stiff as crinolines, smile plasticized, a penis in one hand . . . a spatula in the other. This is the kind of novel one can imagine being taught � all those literary references tracked down by students more relentless than I in pursuit of their sources � and the type of novel that’s submitted for awards. But unlike some novels that bore or soar right over my head for the sake of being different, Self has crafted Elaine to be unique in form while totally relatable in substance. I felt I got to know his character “Elaine� (whether or not she is very faithful to the known facts of his actual mother) and hers is a story that I am glad to have been told. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 24, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0399590129
| 9780399590122
| 0399590129
| 3.87
| 1,932
| Jul 30, 2024
| Jul 30, 2024
|
really liked it
| Tut, dun's the mouse, the constable's own word. Tut, dun's the mouse, the constable's own word. Although author Bret Anthony Johnston states in his Acknowledgements at the end of We Burn Daylight that this “is not about David Koresh�, this is the story of a charismatic leader � named Perry Cullen, aka “The Lamb� � and the doomsday religion that he founds on a shambolic ranch outside of Waco, Texas, which was eventually subject to siege and deadly raid by government forces in March of 1993. Told in short, alternating chapters by a pair of fourteen-year-old “star-crossed lovers� (hence the source of title) � Roy is the upstanding son of the local Sheriff, and Jaye is the (barely) more worldly daughter of a woman who was drawn to the Lamb from California; both Roy and Jaye being good, innocent kids, hungry in that familiar adolescent way for love and validation � and although the reader knows where the escalating standoff between law enforcement and the residents of the highly armed ranch must lead (and to be sure, there is plenty of foreshadowing along the way), this is a heart-wrenching, pulse-pounding, deeply philosophical exploration of faith and social constructs and the real limits of freedom. Johnston’s prose is clear and propulsive � the cold, barren landscape is masterfully captured without a hint of sentimentality � and his characters are real and relatable; even those who would knowingly follow what others might call a “cult�; even the so-called cult leader himself is simply following his own fate. Thirty years after the raid on the Branch Davidians, it might be easy to blame the debacle entirely on government overreach, but here Johnston explores the events that led up to that day � the growing unease of the local community (I hear he has illegal weapons, I hear he’s impregnating underage girls), the mounting paranoia within the ranch (These are the end times, the prophesied opening of the Seventh Seal), and a government that feels its authority under scrutiny (with recent fiascos in Montana and Idaho) � there’s an inevitability to the ensuing tragedy that feels Shakespearian in the end. This was an outstanding reading experience (especially for someone like myself who watched the raid on the Branch Davidians with confused horror as it played out in the day), and it could have rated five stars, but I did not like the way that Johnston wrapped his story up. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Hidy there, everybody. Good afternoon. Or evening. Sorry to be tardy, but we’ve had ourselves a dustup at the ranch. As you’ve heard by now, people have taken to calling me the Lamb, which is sure nicer than other names I’ve been called. Anyway we’ve had these pork choppers flying at us. I don’t mean to tease. I appreciate y’all tuning in, I do. Well so, okay, it’s the eighteenth day of February 1993, the year of our Lord, and I’m talking at you, through your radios, in your homes and cars and places of commerce, about the revelation of Jesus Christ. That’s the big to-do. As creepy and delusional as The Lamb may seem, he doesn’t actually appear to be breaking any laws: His visions have called for him to propagate the “New Light, which seemed to be children who would inherit the earth after the Wave Sheaf scrubbed it of sin�; which does involve him sleeping with everyone of breeding age, including underage girls (with theirs and their parents� consent; so not technically illegal in Texas), and although the community does make their money by reselling weapons on the gun show circuit (and by having a popular shooting range on the ranch), the weapons are all registered, and is absolutely in keeping with the local ethos of “God, Guts, Guns�. The local Sheriff, Eli, sees nothing of concern on routine visits to the ranch, CPS sees no reason to remove any of the children when they follow up on reports from concerned citizens, and even “the taxman� is kept at bay by the group’s tidy bookkeeping and tax exempt status. Even so, the feds will eventually want to have a look inside, and that’s exactly what the prophecy of the Wave Sheaf predicted: and it’s hard to put normal pressure on a people who want be deemed worthy of “translation� to the afterlife. But all of that happens in the background as Ro And still more noise � the walls absorbing what they could, the helicopters and yelling and sobbing and coughing, my breathing coming too fast and the awful high-pitched gurgling of our chickens as they were being shot and people pleading with God and barking orders and information: Get down ! Over here now! They’re still coming! I can see them and they’re still coming! Then a single shot and the sickening muffled thunk of its impact, a sledgehammer into a sandbag. Then an enormous gasp � like someone breaching the surface of water after too long below. The gasping continued and turned wet, and a man cried out, “No! No no no no!� Then, as if all the agents were ordered to aim at the same thing and hold down their triggers at the same time: The dinner bell tolled tolled tolled tolled until it dropped to the frozen earth and silenced. In a stroke of narrative genius, Johnston also has intermittent transcripts from a modern day podcast called “ON THE LAMB�, which sees its host interviewing people who had been involved in the raid, trying to learn what lessons might have been gleaned by thirty years of contemplation on those events. This includes an interview with a defensive retired Special Agent: What happened was tragic, no question, but there’s also no doubt about who bears responsibility: Cullen. We can debate tactics and strategies, tanks and tear gas, but if Cullen hadn’t abused those kids, we wouldn’t have been there. And an interview with one of the few survivors among the Lamb’s followers, recently released from prison: Didn’t they run out of ammo? Isn’t that what being outgunned means? And an interview with Roy’s long-suffering father, retired Sheriff Eli Mo We aren’t built to matter. That’s the surprise here. That’s the big finale. Tell the story a million times, a million different ways, but the ones who were punished and the ones who were pardoned ain’t switching places. And it all serves to satisfyingly explore both how something like this could have actually happened in the “Land of the Free� (without needing to be 100% faithful to the truth of Koresh and the Branch Davidians) and what it all means in the end: Did we win or lose? Are we damned or saved? We occupy a liminal, leftover world, and we live off scraps. We build our religion, our very existences, with salvaged and stolen parts, waiting for the next fire. To survive is to know what no one else does: Nothing is forever. Not an alibi or shelter, not bloodline or prayer, not nation or sacrifice or any glad-hearted dream of God. A well-written and compelling narrative, with a sweet and relatable love story at its heart, this isn’t quite a retelling of Romeo and Juliet, but it is definitely Shakespearian in its tragedian format and philosophical heart; this leaves me with much to think about and I’m looking forward to exploring Johnston’s earlier work. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Apr 20, 2024
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1685890709
| 9781685890704
| 1685890709
| 4.35
| 85
| unknown
| Apr 16, 2024
|
it was amazing
| The knowledge base of natural history is under threat as research funding is increasingly focussed on fast-paced, short-term experimental work over The knowledge base of natural history is under threat as research funding is increasingly focussed on fast-paced, short-term experimental work over the slower-paced, longer-term observational work necessary to build and maintain it. I felt compelled to write this book because it seems to be a problem that everyone in biological research and almost no one outside of it is aware of. Like many of the extinctions quietly proceeding around the world, it just isn’t something we hear about. We as citizens and stewards of this planet owe it to ourselves and our children to be aware not only of the issue but of the opportunities we have to contribute to its solution. Unrooted is one scientist’s story of what led her to the field of Botany, the changes she witnessed within the grind of academia as she pursued her PhD, and the impossibility of finding employment in her field after proudly earning her doctorate (a situation made dramatically worse once she became a mother). Erin Zimmerman writes in a clear and engaging voice � whether describing the electric jolt of reading Charles Darwin’s own handwriting on a specimen’s label at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, or the indignity of having to squirrel herself away in a musty change room to pump breast milk as a postdoc, this is a beautiful blend of memoir, science history, and an impassioned defence of the importance of her disappearing field of expertise. This is exactly the sort of thing I like � I learned a lot and was affected, heart and mind; I couldn’t ask for more and wish Dr Zimmerman nothing but success. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Sitting down to my stack of herbarium specimens and alcohol-preserved flowers every day felt like losing myself in a good book. Scientific research topics can seem narrow to the point of absurdity, like an entire career spent on a single species, but ask any scientist, and they’ll tell you that there really is a lifetime’s worth of discovery there. It speaks to the complexity of our universe that even the thinnest slices can be so expansive. To me, sustained, close attention to a little-regarded slice of that universe felt spiritual, like time spent in quiet worship before a vast and intricate cosmos, trying to know it just a little bit better. Technically a taxonomist (Zimmerman could spend whole days in close scrutiny of plant parts, sketching what she saw with the delightfully anachronistic use of pen and ink) with an eventual focus on Dialiinae (in the legume family, but more exotic than just peas and beans), Zimmerman’s work was not unlike that of the early collectors like Joseph Banks and Alexander von Humboldt. What was particularly fascinating to me was to learn that Herbariums around the world are filled with thousands of samples dating back to the days of these early world-wide adventurers, some of them hundreds of years old, which have never been through the hands of a trained taxonomist (and even if some of these sample types have already been described, each unique sample � with its known date and location of collection, along with anything peculiar to the sample itself � would contain a wealth of information about climate, the environment, and challenges to growth). But as Zimmerman made her way through her postgraduate work, she watched as the discipline of Botany was folded into generic Biology departments, those researchers who were known in the field as taxonomists were changing their focus to computer-aided dna analysis (because that’s where the funding is), and even her own future husband dropped out of academia to pursue an education with a guaranteed job at the end. Zimmerman makes the case that the sort of work she did � slow and methodical, at the human scale � is imperative for making the kind of discoveries that make people care about the world and its disappearing species; as Damon Little of the New York Botanical Garden said, “If something doesn’t have a name, you can’t conserve it.� (It is estimated that there are 350 000 or more unknown/unnamed plant species.) I appreciated everything Zimmerman shares about her experience as a woman in science � from some incredible female mentors to the male supervisor who patronisingly spoke to her with a hand on her knee � and her historical overview of women in the field (from sample collecting seen as a gentile hobby for gentlewomen, to men erecting an ivory tower around the field when they decided to make Botany a “serious� science), and as she watched the pathway to tenure become ever narrower in her field of expertise (less than twenty-five per cent of PhDs will eventually find themselves with a tenured position), the reality of motherhood seemed to close that door to Zimmerman for good. There was no one dramatic incident that extinguished my desire to be in research. What I’d faced was an environment in which I was under strong pressure to never need accommodation, to never let anyone see that I had other loyalties in my life. It was a death by a thousand tiny cuts. And that’s what makes this story important, because I suspect that’s how it is for many of the nearly half of all women in science who leave after becoming mothers. Each time you’re made to feel unprofessional for having caregiving responsibilities, each time you’re made to feel like a burden for requesting minor accommodation . . . it wears you down a little more. You believe that you are the problem. And when the reward at the end of those years of hard work and low pay are far from assured, it doesn’t take a PhD to figure out you might be happier and better off elsewhere, no matter how much you loved the actual science and the questions you were trying to answer. Unrooted ends on a positive note � Zimmerman has found a career in science writing that allows her to balance her work and family responsibilities � but she continues to stress that Botany matters in our threatened world. I loved everything about this � the science, the exposé of persistent sexism and grant-chasing in academia, and Zimmerman’s personal history � and would recommend this to anyone who enjoyed Lab Girl or Braiding Sweetgrass. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0593655222
| 9780593655221
| B0CR9PBVJK
| 4.32
| 3,421
| Oct 18, 2022
| Oct 01, 2024
|
really liked it
| Valdemar wasn’t a Nazi, even if a lot of people thought he was. When he spoke about the Third Realm, it wasn’t the Nazis he was talking about but s Valdemar wasn’t a Nazi, even if a lot of people thought he was. When he spoke about the Third Realm, it wasn’t the Nazis he was talking about but something people had believed in the Middle Ages, that the First Realm was the age of God, the Second Realm the age of Christ, the Third Realm the age of the Holy Spirit. My sensibilities haven’t really jibed with Karl Ove Knausgård’s writing (I didn’t get past the first volume of his much-lauded “Min kamp� series), and while I need to admit that I didn’t realise that The Third Realm was the third book in a new series when I decided to give it a try, I also have to state that I liked this a lot (and that there doesn’t seem to have been anything lost in starting the series here; this seems to be an alternate view of the same fantastical events from the first book, The Morning Star, with many of the same characters, and enough backstory that I never felt lost.) This reads as Sci Fi: a new star has appeared large and bright in the sky (but is it actually a star?) and it seems to be having some strange effects on Earth below (or are they all coincidences?) And like all the best of Sci Fi, Knausgård uses his concept to explore the human condition � consciousness, madness, the basis of reality � while exposing moments of relatable truth in mundane interactions, writing engagingly of the fells, fjords, and mountain pools of the Norwegian setting, and propulsively describing strange and uncanny events. My mind was piqued and entertained throughout, and I can definitely see myself going back to catch up on the other books in this series. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) The psychosis occurs when the mania exhausts itself, when the encounter with reality is the only thing left for it (and mania fears reality more than anything else). The psychosis is like one of the three doors in the folk tales, the one that must never be opened no matter what. It mustn’t be opened. Everyone knows. And yet it always gets opened in the end. When faced with nothing and something, you choose something first. The novel begins with Tove � a painter, on seaside holiday with her family � who has a history of psychosis, and has decided to stop taking her meds. This leads to dark depression, terrifying voices, and when her mind shifts to mania, an upsurge in creativity with inspiration from Norse mythology, Jungian archetypes, and unbridled eroticism. Her husband suggests that she’s a “neosymbolist� or a “postmythologist�, with Tove retorting that while he’s interested in categorising, she focuses on decategorising. And I think that’s important because anytime an author writes a conversation like this, I assume he’s speaking for himself: throughout The Third Realm Knausgård has various characters discuss and create art, architecture, and music, and whether it’s a memorial building, third wave black metal, or a bipolar artist painting nude self-portraits, these characters consider and reject cultural touchstones (trolls, crofters, and underground halls) and strive for something more authentic and unformed. Tove says of her work (and I’m assuming this is Knausgård commenting on his own writing efforts): I wanted my drawings to smell, to stink, to seep and bleed, writhe and squirm. But I hadn’t succeeded. I told myself it was the fault of drawing itself, the very form of expression. The pen stroke served only to encase and bring under control, rationalising everything and thereby rendering it tame. So the plotline of this novel � often fantastical, with the mysterious new star seemingly affecting affairs below � seems very free form, with people going about their routine lives (drinking wine and eating prawns and putting the kids to bed), while outside these ordinary walls, other people are going missing, enacting bloody rituals, having strokes, and refusing to die. For every weird happenstance (a young woman who opened the door to her landlords� hysterical son now wonders if he was even real, people seemingly stopped dying as soon as the star appeared, a round-faced stranger keeps popping up who seems to know everyone’s business) there are rational people investigating, and explaining, what’s going on: the detective, the journalist, the neuroscientist. While I started by calling this Sci Fi (because of the star � or is it a comet? A UFO, as one character muses?), this novel kind of defies categorisation; Knausgård seems less interested in neosymbolism than in decategorisation; in unshackling his ideas from the chains of the mode of their expression (which, yes, could be argued to be what he was aiming for with the “Min kamp� series, too, but autofiction on the minutiae of his ordinary life was less interesting to me). This shackling � the inability to express oneself without resorting to the artificiality of language � is the key conflict of the human experience, and this ironic discord is present down to the level of our brain tissue, as seen on an MRI: It was like looking into the unknown. It was a language, but one so foreign and incomprehensible it might just as well have been delivered to us from outer space. The truly unfathomable thing was that it was ourselves we were looking at. That what was made manifest to us was our very coding of the world around us and all that we were. The mystery was that from the inside it didn’t feel like code at all, but the world itself. The nature of reality (and especially its inconstancy between different minds), the division between life and death (and what comes after), what makes a moral life: these are all important questions being explored by this novel. But as the star continues to shine, and people continue to mysteriously suffer strokes, there is excitement in the plot as some of those sufferers awake with a message: “The ddoor …� he said. It turns out that starting at book three in this series was a good thing: I find myself compelled to go both backwards and forwards with this strange story. Happily jibing with Knausgård on this one! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 15, 2024
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Apr 15, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0593446097
| 9780593446096
| 0593446097
| 4.09
| 57,606
| Sep 10, 2024
| Sep 10, 2024
|
it was amazing
| They stood there for a few moments, not looking at each other, and then Lucy finally looked at him and said, “I am so glad to see you.� The day was They stood there for a few moments, not looking at each other, and then Lucy finally looked at him and said, “I am so glad to see you.� The day was sunny, and Bob put his sunglasses on. And then off they went for their walk. Lucy said, “Tell me everything. Tell me every single thing. And don’t leave anything out.� I find something so soothing about Elizabeth Strout’s voice, and as she keeps returning to the same handful of characters over the course of her writing, I always get the feeling of catching up with old friends when I sit down with one of her books. Tell Me Everything has the feeling of a capstone narrative � all of Strout’s characters are now living and interacting with one another in Crosby, Maine � and as they visit together, telling each other stories � mostly old stories of lost loves, heartache, and women done wrong � it would be easy to dismiss this as unserious or trivial; gossip and blether. But as they talk together, and really listen to one another, it seems a demonstration of uncommon grace and I came to feel that there’s likely nothing more important than dissecting human connection through such discussions of the human heart. I don’t know if this would be as satisfying for a reader who hasn’t spent many long and pleasant hours in the company of these characters before, but for me, it was sublime. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) A thought had taken hold of Olive Kitteridge on one of these days in October, and she pondered it for almost a week before she called Bob Burgess. “I have a story to tell that writer Lucy Barton. I wish you would have her come visit me.� That’s right: Olive Kitteridge (now ninety and living in a retirement community), Lucy Barton (still living in the big house by the sea with ex-husband William), and the Burgess boys (Bob having stayed home in Maine, now married to the Unitarian minister, Margaret, and Jim still living with his wife, Helen, in New York) are all in regular contact with one another. And as Bob and Lucy have their walks in the woods and Olive and Lucy have their living room chats, one thing seems to be certain: The Boomers are not okay. The seasons are noticeably out of whack, there’s an unfathomable homeless encampment behind the Walmart, there are drug and housing crises � not made better by rich out-of-towners like William and Lucy buying up property during the pandemic and deciding to stay on � and everyone’s adult children have moved far away. As they approach retirement, these folks are exhausted and stooped with care, forever haunted by failed marriages, unhappy childhoods, and what might have been: life is hard for the sin-eaters and the linchpins, those with repressed or false memories, and those who find themselves living with ghosts in their marriages. There’s a criminal case at the heart of the plot, and over the course of the novel we are caught up with the lives of all of the kids and ex-spouses, but Tell Me Everything is mostly about the grace-filled moments in which our familiar old friends Olive, Lucy, and Bob talk and really listen to one another. Once again, there’s a conversational lightness to the tone, as though it’s Elizabeth Strout herself, shrugging off her parka as she settles onto the uncomfortable couch across from us, who can’t wait to tell us these stories of lost loves and heartache and the beautiful strangers she has encountered. New sections often start “Here is what had been happening to Pam: ... Then this happened, and it was ridiculous: � Her defense � as you might recall � was that…� And I found this technique to be charming and engaging; an invitation to participate personally in the moments of grace. Again: I know that sounds lightweight, but true experiences need not be heavy. Lucy stood up and pulled on her coat. “Those are my stories,� she said, and then bent down to put her boots back on. “But you’re right. They are stories of loneliness and love.� Lucy stepped into the tiny kitchen for a moment and returned with a paper towel and she bent down and soaked up the drops of water on the floor left from her boots. Then she picked up her bag and said, “And the small connections we make in this world if we are lucky.� Strout might not have come up with the meaning of life here (indeed, the question itself caused a rare spat between Lucy and Bob), but she certainly demonstrates how to find meaning in life, and I feel lucky to have formed such a deep connection with her body of work. Sublime. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Apr 14, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B0BTZW48Q6
| 3.54
| 39,504
| Sep 12, 2023
| Sep 12, 2023
|
really liked it
| “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?� He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing qui “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?� He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,� he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?� Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire � these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light�) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother � who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip � had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge�; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity� known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood � we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten � and as Belle has “treatments� in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals � so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams � and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow� � a brightening or moon-like luminosity � of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror and as a warning. The storytelling is cinematic (the publisher’s blurb describes this as �Snow White meets Eyes Wide Shut�, and that feels about right), and while there are some funny bits, it’s of the wincing, ironic variety. More than anything, this is creeping horror � showcasing the horrors of modern life � wrapped in fairy tale motifs, and it made for a compelling read that I felt in my bones. Just to my tastes. Merged review: “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?� He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,� he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?� Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire � these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light�) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother � who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip � had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge�; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity� known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood � we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten � and as Belle has “treatments� in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals � so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams � and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow� � a brightening or moon-like luminosity � of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror and as a warning. The storytelling is cinematic (the publisher’s blurb describes this as �Snow White meets Eyes Wide Shut�, and that feels about right), and while there are some funny bits, it’s of the wincing, ironic variety. More than anything, this is creeping horror � showcasing the horrors of modern life � wrapped in fairy tale motifs, and it made for a compelling read that I felt in my bones. Just to my tastes. Merged review: “Tad, did my mother ever talk to you about Rouge?� He looks at me. Just for a second something flashes darkly in his eyes. Like a cloud passing quickly over the sun. It’s there and then it’s gone. And then: “Rouge,� he repeats like a question. Too much of a question. He squinches up his face like he’s confused. “No? Never heard of that. Rouge, huh? Is that French or something?� Part fairy tale, part indictment of the beauty industry, Rouge tells a story that could be pigeonholed as fun, creepy horror if it wasn’t so crushingly relatable. With magic mirrors, predatory bogeymen, and fantastical transformations, author Mona Awad isn’t exactly going for literary realism here; but as an examination of mothers and daughters, the time girls and women spend harshly judging ourselves and each other, the pain we will endure in an effort to inspire envy and desire � these are important social issues and there is much literary satisfaction in Awad wrapping their examination in the stories through which we (in the West) would have first internalised the impossible ideals of feminine beauty and behaviour. And the whole thing’s pretty damn creepy. I was entertained throughout while recognising that I was being shown hard truths, and if I had a small complaint, it would be that this felt just a tad too long. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I have to pack this place up. Hire someone with money I don’t have, to fix all the broken shit. Sell it. Then get the hell out of here and go back to work. All in a few days. It’s impossible. It may as well be a tower full of straw that I’m supposed to spin into gold. I may as well be waiting for a goblin to show up with his dark promise to help me. In the wall of cracked mirrors, I see that my skin is in desperate need of mushroom mist. As Rouge begins, Belle (Mirabel Nour; a name that “looks like night but means light�) has travelled from her Montreal home to California in order to settle her recently deceased mother’s affairs. We soon learn that Belle’s relationship with her mother � who had been a great beauty; a wannabe moviestar in the perfect Chanel red lip � had been complicated; and while they weren’t exactly estranged, there are reasons why the two women weren’t living in the same city anymore. As Belle starts to go through her mother’s things, she begins to receive online ads for a swanky looking spa named “Rouge�; and when Belle tries on a pair of her mother’s red heels, her feet seem to know the way along the cliffside trail that eventually leads to the “opulent monstrosity� known as La Maison de Méduse, where Belle is welcomed and admired as the Daughter of Noelle. Could this be Rouge? It kind of looks like a spa; it does have a gift shop. The narrative splits between the present and Belle’s childhood � we learn that Belle has holes in her memory leading up to the time that her mother decided to move without her to California, when Belle was ten � and as Belle has “treatments� in the present that seem to be erasing her sense of self, gaps from the past are filled in even as the present is slipping away. Belle’s behaviour becomes ever more erratic, and while there are friends of her mother’s who offer to help guide her through her grief, it’s hard to judge their motivations; hard to tell wolf from huntsman. And through it all, Belle is chasing her mother’s beauty secrets. Let’s skip cleansing and go right to acid, my favorite. Mother’s favorite too. Acid is like cleansing but better, right, Mother? It goes deep into the ick you can’t see with your human eye, and it just melts that away like a witch. Shall we do the one that smells like it’ll numb your face or the one that smells like burning? You pick, Mother. Mother’s smile says surprise me. Right from the beginning, we watch as Belle engages in obsessive beauty rituals � so many layers of cleansers and masks and essences and creams � and learn that she compulsively watches a series of YouTube beauty videos created by a Dr. Marva. In scenes from the past, it’s shown that the child Belle was entranced by her mother’s natural beauty and sense of style, and while Noelle was a pale-skinned redhead who avoided the sun at all costs, she was forever telling Belle (who has golden skin and dark hair from her [absent] Egyptian father) that she was the lucky one with the beautiful colouring; and Belle wasn’t buying it. Not only does this setup allow for an examination of the jealousy that can be present between a mother and daughter (the child jealous of an adult’s freedom to explore and display her sexuality; the adult jealous of a child’s youth and freshness), but at the cult-like Rouge (is it a spa?), the ultimate goal seems to be achieving the “glow� � a brightening or moon-like luminosity � of whiteness; there’s an added, insidious layer to the beauty ideal Belle is chasing that underscores her OCD behaviours. Nothing saves us in the end, Tom said, stroking my hair. Not gods or shadow gods. Not heaven or the endless deep. Not blood or cream red as blood. Rouge, as they say. And he smiled his smile that lit me up. I’ll put this slightly spoilery observation behind spoiler tags: (view spoiler)[In one subplot, not-Tom-Cruise (some kind of shape-shifting shadowy figure from beyond the looking glass) was able to attach itself to the child Belle (leading to the holes in her memory), and the only thing I want to note about that is how scarily easy it is for a grown man (or male energy in Tom Cruise form) to flatter and lure a prepubescent girl: I recognised lonely young Belle’s yearning for love and acceptance, and coupled with the cult of celebrity in teenybopper magazines, I could completely accept that Belle would do Tom’s bidding if he said she was beautiful and leaned in for a kiss. (hide spoiler)] And reframe it as: There were many, many relationship details in this fairy-tale-like story that were completely relatable to me, and as with all the best fairy tales, it serves as a mirror ...more |
Notes are private!
|
2
|
Mar 17, 2023
not set
|
Mar 20, 2023
not set
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0226832988
| 9780226832982
| 0226832988
| 4.00
| 5
| unknown
| May 01, 2024
|
really liked it
| We’ve got excellent reasons to engage in the wisecracking life, but we may also have serious moral qualms about doing so. My title points to a kind We’ve got excellent reasons to engage in the wisecracking life, but we may also have serious moral qualms about doing so. My title points to a kind of pun: Wisecracks may both bridge cracks and crack bridges, bond people and divide them. Which one occurs depends crucially on what role, if any, empathy plays in the exchange. David Shoemaker is a much-published philosopher and a Professor at the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell University, and in our modern reality of social media piling-on and cancel culture, he was interested in investigating what role humour (specifically wisecracks) plays in human interaction and whether there is something objectively valuable about this kind of “put down� humour that could speak back to the “prigs� with their efforts to silence others with a blanket “There’s nothing funny about ______� attitude. Wisecracks is the result of that investigation, and as Shoemaker is a fan of wisecracking humour himself, he entertainingly balances scholarship with snark and assembles what I found to be a compelling argument in favour of this type of joking around. This is exactly the sort of thing I like to read about, and it was well done. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Wisecracks are ways of interacting with other people, but they are distinctive because what makes wisecracks aesthetically good � amusing � is often the very same thing that can make them morally bad. They tweak or ignore some of the norms that sustain our interpersonal lives, such as our expectations of trust and honesty, our desires for respect and equal worth, our concern to be viewed as the particular people we are (rather than as members of some group). These features make them very different, and far more interesting, than jokes. As a philosopher, Shoemaker begins by defining terms: the difference between jokes and wisecracks, the surprisingly long list of elements (his “kitchen sink theory�) that can make a statement humorous, and the admittedly tautologically cute definition of amusing as that which a “properly developed, refined, and unobstructed human sense of humor would respond to with amusement� (each element of which is further explored). I found it interesting that Shoemaker found no philosophical scholarship on wisecracking in particular (although there has been research on written “jokes�, which Shoemaker contrarily argues have zero moral element; a position which piqued me), but as someone whose own family regularly roasts one another at the dinner table, I can certainly agree that this kind of humour � and especially wisecracks based on inside information and long memories � serves to raise the mood and reinforce bonds (as they say on Comedy Central: we only roast the ones we love). Along the way, Shoemaker addresses taboo topics (racism, sexism, disabilities, sexual assault), those without “properly developed� senses of humour (such as folks with autism or psychopaths), those with “obstructed� senses of humour (buffoons � they who mistakenly, and annoyingly, see humour in everything � and prigs, who refuse to look for humour behind a wisecrack based on misguided principles). And I found all of this to be fascinating and compelling. What crucially matters in responding correctly to both the funniness and the moral status of a wisecrack are the wisecrackers intentions and motives, which amount to what the wisecracker means by it and what his or her attitudes are toward others affected or targeted by the wisecrack. Ultimately, intentions are everything; the love behind the roast. There’s a passage in which Shoemaker compares a picture of Demi Lovato getting “slimed� at the Nickelodeon Kids� Choice Awards and Stephen King’s Carrie having the bucket of pigs� blood dumped on her head at Prom: a pan to the audience in each situation shows people laughing hysterically, but if you had to explain the difference in the two similar-looking scenes to a visitor from another planet (my own analogy), you’d harken to the pranksters� intentions and desired effects and easily be able to explain that one was meant in fun and the other in cruelty. And when it comes to wisecracks, whether at the dinner table or on social media, the “morality� of any quip ought to be judged in these terms as well. Very interesting and timely stuff, well argued. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
Apr 07, 2024
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1668015358
| 9781668015353
| B0CL5FF663
| 3.60
| 68
| unknown
| Aug 06, 2024
|
really liked it
| neither neither As a Bosnian who emigrated as a youth to the United States during the Yugoslav Wars, Ismet Prcic no doubt has plenty of trauma to unpack. Unspeakable Home reads as an autofictional account of just such a young man’s journey � containing stories of his shame-filled childhood, teenage years as a drunken orange-mohawked punk, a short-lived stint with his paternal uncle in California, and his college/young adult/married years with the Beloved � and the format is highly self-aware and unconventional by design. Prcic starts with a fan letter to the comedian Bill Burr, bemoaning his recent marital breakup (You wonder whether she would have filed for divorce if, instead of PTSD and alcoholism, your diagnosis had been diabetes or cancer, if your maladies were visible, measurable, if they didn’t have to be communicated by words, if they didn’t have to be believed to be true.) and then proceeds to describe how he intends to write this novel as a sort of mix tape of two halves. Throughout, details are hinted at in these letters to Bill Burr, and then stories are told about those details, often from different angles, and by the end, an entire, trauma-filled life has been explored in a precisely crafted work of art that knowingly exposes the craftsmanship. I truly do admire Prcic’s craft, and I am grateful for what I learned here about the Bosnian war experience, but I don’t always perfectly connect emotionally with this kind of postmodern MFA-trained writing style: art is subjective, and while I can recognise the skill on display here, it wasn’t entirely to my own tastes; I will understand every five star review or award this garners. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Historically, the Balkans � that gorgeous, ungovernable, godforsaken peninsula always in turmoil, always on the fringes of civilizations, always a broken-up borderland � had for centuries been a place to survive, endure. It had also been a place to fail to escape from and � both because and in spite of this � to love fiercely. If you were from this lush volatility, chances were you’d in some way participate in at least one war � two or even three if God really had it in for you and gave you a long life. Coming from a centrally planned childhood with seaside vacations � surrounded by family and comrades � and huffing glue on bombed out streets with his punk gang (always afraid of being called up early to the country’s underequipped, undermanned army), the narrator was of two minds when his family decided to send him to America: relief at escaping the chaos, and survivor’s guilt for leaving everyone else behind. He describes this as PTSD (and when he eventually reveals some secrets about his childhood, we learn why he was always kind of broken), and this leads to alcoholism (with many stories of hiding and sneaking and scrounging for alcohol), and this leads to him losing everything. This is a novel of vignettes, framed between the fan letters to Burr, with self-aware metanarration, as when he quotes an article by Marina Biti and Iva Rosanda Žigo (“The Silenced Narrator and the Notion of ‘Proto-Narrative'�) that references Prcic’s first novel Shards: The complexity of the narrative structure that involves not only multiple levels of diegesis and various diegetic combinations discussed by Genette but also an unusual correlation between verifiable reality and fiction, invites theoretical speculation primarily concerning elements that can be qualified as ‘disruptive� to the memoir, related to trauma. So, I guess he’s telling us that that’s what he’s doing here, too? Prcic later writes: I’m not writing a biopic here; this is not that kind of story and mine is not that kind of life. I’ve got my conciliatory designs on the synapses between life and story of life � my own timid, wide-eyed attempt at living it � which is why I’m compelled to leave my sketches in, to show the work, as it were. If you spend your time on Earth trying to understand how you fit in life instead of living it, then to you, trying to understand is living, and what you’re reading is that hard admittance. And so: This is obviously a well-written novel, crafted by a skilled and self-reflective author � and it also did give me a sense of what living through and escaping a conflict like this can do to a mind � so it is undeniably a worthwhile and artful read; another reader will want exactly this. This reader, as a matter of taste, prefers a novel that pretends to be only what it is. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
Apr 03, 2024
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0593475283
| 9780593475287
| 0593475283
| 3.46
| 1,858
| Aug 20, 2024
| Aug 20, 2024
|
liked it
| Obituaries of the scathing variety are really what inspired our ventures into the world of the macabre. I mean hello . . . it’s why we put the bitc Obituaries of the scathing variety are really what inspired our ventures into the world of the macabre. I mean hello . . . it’s why we put the bitch in OBITCHUARY! Yes they’re hilarious, in an absurd morbid way, but really it’s the shock factor. Who would have thought that such a thing existed, and what would prompt somebody to write one? Well, as it turns out, there’s a variety of reasons. The truth of the matter is, some people just plain suck. We can all probably name at least one person in our lives worthy of some petty last words. Spencer Henry and Madison Reyes have hosted a weekly podcast since 2021 called OBITCHUARY � which started as a venue for sharing “outlandish, hilarious, and sometimes scathing obituaries�, and has grown to include “bizarre history, strange funeral traditions� and a “dumb criminals segment� � and this is a compilation of some of their favourite findings. I expected Obitchuary: The Big Hot Book of Death to be more comprehensive (along the lines of Mary Roach’s Stiff), but while this is not a very serious look at the science or history surrounding death and its rituals, there was much here I hadn’t known before, all told in small, punchy bites. I feel this was written for a younger reader than I � the humour didn’t really land with me � but I do appreciate the effort to demystify that big unknown that’s coming for us all. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Examples of the facts and the writing style: � Philip Clover of Columbus, Ohio, developed a device he called the “coffin torpedo� in 1878. In his words, it was a device created to “prevent the unauthorized resurrection of dead bodies.� It involved a system of triggers and springs that detonates an explosion of lead balls if the casket lid is opened after burial. Judge Thomas N. Howell invented his revision of the coffin-torpedo with the catchy slogan, “Sleep well, sweet angel, let no fears of ghouls disturb thy rest, for above thy shrouded form lies a torpedo, ready to make mincemeat of anyone who attempts to convey you to the pickling vat.� Hot damn. Imagine you’re just trying to get some cash for gold to get a bump on a Saturday night and � WHAMMY� your meat is minced, babe. Ultimately: There were fewer “scathing� obituaries than I expected, fewer new and interesting facts (but to be fair, more than none), and nothing really made me laugh, but I did appreciate the aim of demystifying death: there was a section on the “alarming� suicide rates in South Korea and efforts being made (by places such as the Hyowon Healing Center) to offer “living funerals� � in which people can don shrouds and enter a dim room with a coffin in order to meditate on the reality and finality of death � and this actually seems to help these people better embrace life, so a story like that confirms the importance of conversations like those found in this book: We hope you enjoyed our little romp through death. Our aim was to make you laugh and teach you something new while maybe changing how you see death. It’s a scary topic, one that is hard to comprehend, but learning about it gives us power. We wanted to show that it’s okay to talk about it and that knowledge can help us understand it better. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
Mar 28, 2024
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0771098316
| 9780771098314
| B0CF4NKWC4
| 3.90
| 949
| Aug 27, 2024
| Aug 27, 2024
|
it was amazing
| As a child it would put me in mind of a line of that poem that had been read aloud to us by our poetry-loving Master back in Ontario: “‘In winter I As a child it would put me in mind of a line of that poem that had been read aloud to us by our poetry-loving Master back in Ontario: “‘In winter I get up at night ,’� he had begun, “‘and dress by yellow candle-light.’� Then came the musical rhythm of poetics, with a onesyllabled final verse that began with the line “‘And does it not seem hard to you?’� In Winter I Get Up at Night is a beautifully considered and composed history of Canada’s expansion west into the “northern Great Plains�. Jane Urquhart’s writing is fluid and reads effortlessly as her main character, Emer McConnell � a middle-aged itinerant teacher of music, and less frequently, art � goes about her business, driving long stretches from rural classroom to rural classroom, and remembers her own time as a student in one-room schoolhouses (and the imperious Inspector of Schools, and sometimes instructor, who followed her family from Ontario to Saskatchewan), the time she was severely injured in a tornado (and the year she spend recovering on a children’s ward with a colourful group of other patients, doctors, and nursing sisters), and the great love of her life: a famous scientist who would meet the permanently disabled Emer at remote hotels along the railway’s spur lines for years, but who would not agree to be seen with her in public. Exploring imperialism, racism, what women will do for love, and the true history of a people who are not as blameless as we may like to think we are, Urquhart forces us to reevaluate the Canada of the twentieth century through the eyes of a good person mulling over terrible events. It takes the entire novel to tie a bunch of threads together, and while I wasn’t exactly surprised by any of the ultimate revelations, everything does conclude on a satisfying note. I’ve been a longtime fan of Urquhart’s work, and this is a tour de force; rounding up to five stars. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) My family, whose ancestors had endured the outlawing of their language and religion, the imperial takeover of their land, and the peril of famine, could never free themselves from property hunger. They gobbled up land in Ontario, field by field. Then they sent my father out to feast on the prairies in a similar fashion. All this without giving more than a passing thought to those who had for millennia inhabited the geography my family coveted. One tribe, forced out of its homeland by imperial dominance, war, and scarcity, migrates across the sea and forces another tribe out of its homeland. My husband had a great uncle who, injured at Vimy Ridge, was granted a large section of land in Saskatchewan and moved out there to ranch after WWI, but I had never before heard, as is written here, that just as in Ireland a family would expect one of their sons to become a priest, an Irish immigrant family in rural Ontario would instruct one of their sons “to go west for the land that was being made available there� at the beginning of the twentieth century (or that relatives with Irish backgrounds would hold an “immigration wake� for family members leaving the province, knowing that they would never see them again). Urquhart mentions the displaced First Nations a few times, but this is really more about the irony (and ugliness) of people who � immigrants to the land themselves � were capable of racism (and even violence) against fellow immigrants who didn’t quite talk, act, or believe in the same God as themselves. As Emer scrolls through her memories, she reveals a lot of the systemic ugliness she grew up with (unremarkable to her at the time), and when she got older, the even uglier ideas she was exposed to from the powerful world in which her famous lover lived. When I think of the scene now, my legs braided with Harp’s, my head on his arm, speaking about my brother, it seems to come from a country so far away and visited so long ago, no memory can recover its shorelines. Harp’s long body. And that woman who was me, not young, but so much younger than I am now. What of her? How did she manage it all? The man, his body. No one before or after. I was helpless and adrift. He was unknowable. And that meant there wasn’t any part of me that I didn’t want him to understand, to know. “Harp� is a nickname that Emer gave to her secret lover (an inside joke based on Harpocrates, the Hellenistic god of silence and secrecy), but it eventually becomes clear who this real life man is supposed to be � and that kind of bothered me. Urquhart lists a biography of the man among the “dozens of books and articles related to my subject� that she read in preparation for this novel, but even if he was actually a cad and a playboy (and a racist sympathiser with a fetish for scarred bodies?), something feels off about him being an officially unnamed secondary character in this novel � I’m looking forward to seeing what other readers think about this. How strange we all are! Most of us come from Irish and Scottish tribes cast out by the mother country. But we are still reading her poems and singing her songs. How odd that we define foreignness as those whose speech hold the trace of another language, and then we ignore altogether our own foreignness on land that was never our own. I first learned of the Doukhobors (a fascinating people, beloved of Tolstoy, and integral to the storyline) when my own family moved out west in the 1980s; and although their protests and nudity and fire-setting were all very shocking to my young sensibilities, my mother (of pure Irish immigrant background) urged me to open my mind to their beliefs and perspective, so maybe that’s progress? Even so: Urquhart weaves a fascinating story of our little-acknowledged history � with consistently beautiful writing about ugly events � and I am grateful and delighted that this exists. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 22, 2024
|
Mar 25, 2024
|
Mar 22, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1529920248
| 9781529920246
| B0CNGGZYV4
| unknown
| 3.78
| 4,897
| Apr 2006
| Aug 15, 2024
|
it was amazing
| When I think back to my time in Ashiya, the day Mina showed me her boxes of matchboxes stands out as the day she really took me into her confidence When I think back to my time in Ashiya, the day Mina showed me her boxes of matchboxes stands out as the day she really took me into her confidence. Of course, we’d been on good terms before then, but the boxes of boxes opened the final door to our friendship. I was the only one among her friends or family who knew her secret. In that enormous house in Ashiya, she and I were the only ones who knew what was hidden away in those little boxes. A beautiful coming of age story � set in 1972 suburban Japan � Mina’s Matchbox follows two cousins as they bond over first loves, literature, and a pygmy hippopotamus named Pochiko. Translated from the Japanese original, there’s a slightly stiff formality to the writing, but author Yōko Ogawa paints a vivid picture of the time and place, and by the novel’s end, I felt totally immersed and emotionally invested. Ogawa captures something true and universal about this transitional time of life and I believed everything she writes about the long-term effects of childhood experiences, family ties, and being disappointed by the ones we most admire. I loved this, rounding up to five stars. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Whenever I return there in my memory, their voices are as lively as ever, their smiling faces full of warmth. Grandmother Rosa, seated before the makeup mirror she brought from Germany as part of her trousseau, carefully rubbing her face with beauty cream. My aunt in the smoking room, tirelessly hunting for typographical errors. My uncle, impeccably dressed, even at home, endlessly tossing off his quips and jokes. The staff, Yoneda-san and Kobayashi-san, working hard in their respective domains; the family pet, Pochiko, relaxing in the garden. And my cousin Mina reading a book. We always knew when she was about from the rustling of the box of matches she kept in her pocket. The matchboxes were her precious possessions, her talismans. Looking back thirty years later, Tomoko remembers fondly the year that she spent living with her maternal aunt’s family (as Tomoko’s widowed mother upgraded her own education in Tokyo). Tomoko remembers her initial surprise at just how large and luxurious their family home was, how handsome and charming her uncle, and how frail and beautiful her cousin, Mina: one year younger but years ahead in knowledge and sophistication. Mina’s paternal grandmother had been born in Germany, and it added a fascinating dimension to have this ageing and elegant character � still somewhat struggling to speak and read Japanese after forty years in the country � who completely accepted (the technically unrelated Tomoko) into her heart, and whose closest friend is the family housekeeper, Yoneda-san (the pair harmonise beautifully when singing duets in both German and Japanese). It was also interesting to watch the girls excitedly follow the Japanese national men’s volleyball team as they prepared for the Munich Olympics � with the German grandmother happily cheering on both the Japanese and German teams � and then seeing the Black September terrorist attack play out ((view spoiler)[and learn that, having moved to Japan in the 1930s, the grandmother was the only member of her family to survive WWII (hide spoiler)]). Also interesting: the hippopotamus was the only surviving animal from a zoo that Mina’s grandfather had opened on their property (the zoo becoming another victim of WWII), and everything about the pre- and post-war experience of this German-Japanese family was intriguing to me. All of this, and more, is just what’s going on in the background as Tomoko and Mina undergo an intense year of friendship: sharing new experiences, sharing secrets, and Tomoko eventually learning that a big house doesn’t guarantee a happy home. With the passage of time, even as the distance has increased, the memories of the days I spent with Mina in Ashiya have grown more vivid and dense, have taken root deep in my heart. You might even say they’ve become the very foundation of my memory. The matchboxes from Mina, my card from the Ashiya Public Library, the family photo taken in the garden � they’re always with me. On sleepless nights, I open the matchbox and reread the story of the girl who gathered shooting stars. I remember that Sunday adventure, when I went alone to the Fressy factory, received a matchbox from a batlike man, and found the Ezaka Royal Mansion. And when I recall those things, I feel somehow that the past is still alive, still watching over me. The strongest point that Ogawa makes is how impressionable we are at that transitional time into the teenage years, and the experiences and influences we have during that period can build the foundations of who we eventually become. Looking back thirty years later, Tomoko shows where these seeds were planted in her own life, and I thought the whole was pulled off with a deft and subtle touch. Loved it; I will need to get to The Memory Police. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Mar 19, 2024
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||
0393881024
| 9780393881028
| 0393881024
| 3.69
| 1,295
| May 07, 2024
| May 07, 2024
|
it was amazing
| The expression “tits up� is American showbiz slang for an upbeat attitude, often used as a positive send-off from one woman to another. “Tits up� r The expression “tits up� is American showbiz slang for an upbeat attitude, often used as a positive send-off from one woman to another. “Tits up� reminds a woman to stand up, pull her shoulders back, and flourish. It’s a cheer that reassures a sister that she will succeed. Sarah Thornton is a sociologist and ethnographer, and when breast cancer forced her to have a double mastectomy � and she didn’t think twice about having breast implants as part of her reconstructive surgery � she received blowback from her feminist friends that she was caving to the pressures of the patriarchy. Being a lesbian and a public feminist herself, Thornton was in a unique position to self-interrogate on just why she wanted the implants, and as an author who has made a career of writing on art and culture, she went out into the field to investigate those whose work centres on women’s breasts: sex workers, milk bank donors, plastic surgeons, bra designers, and in a bit of a stretch thematically (but intriguing to read about), pagan/witchy women who bare their breasts ritually. In Tits Up, Thornton approaches each experience with curiosity and impartiality, and from lapdancers to lactation consultants, she treats everyone she encounters with dignity and genuine interest. From the fascinating facts to the engaging writing style, I loved everything about this; four and a half stars, perkily rounded up. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Tits Up explores beauty, health, respect, self-esteem, self-determination, humanness, and equality. I hope to shed light on breasts in ways that elevate their value, not just because I believe in some happy, shiny body positivity, but because these organs are emblematic of womanhood. Put another way, I have no doubt that the status of breasts � not to mention tits, titties, jugs, racks, and apexes � is integral to women’s social position. For as long as breasts are disparaged as silly boobs, we will remain the “second sex.� I’ll start by stating that my sense of the title is closer to the British usage: “In Britain, ‘tits up� means something has gone ‘belly up,� like a lifeless fish floating in water�, but I do appreciate Thornton’s more positive usage (and she does suggest that the American showbiz slang might be an ironic flip of the original, like “break a leg�). Thornton starts her investigation in a strip club, and along the way interviews a variety of sex workers (which she calls an “umbrella term� that includes strippers, sensual masseuses, porn [film/online/phone] actors, sexual surrogates, professional sugar babies, dominatrices, karaoke hostesses [domis]; even Hooters waitresses, cheerleaders, and perhaps, wives], and concludes: Strippers, as professional manipulators of male desire, are acutely aware of the dynamics of patriarchy. Sitting here, I’ve come to respect their position on the frontline, observing their shrewd navigation of the global gender war. In the past, I might have assumed that they pandered to patriarchy, but I’ve come to see this perspective as prudish and thoughtlessly classist. Thornton’s ultimate conclusion on this type of work � as a feminist and as a cultural commentator � is that the state needs to stop policing sex work, “If some women can’t sell their bodies, then none of us actually own our bodies.� Thornton turns her attention to milk banks � interviewing those who donate surplus breast milk, those who buy it, and those who run the milk banks � and she discovers a lot about differing global attitudes to breastfeeding (Norway is the world leader, France is culturally opposed [one French woman even had her doctor advise her to stop breastfeeding after eight months because, “Your breasts belong to your husband”], and the USA is somewhere in the middle, with African-Americans least likely to breastfeed [likely a holdover from when enslaved women were forced to wetnurse]), all of which I found fascinating: Most of the “breast is best� conversation has focused on the benefits of breastfeeding for infants, as if the health of mothers were irrelevant � a phenomenon that a militant might dub medical misogyny but which I prefer to call patriarchal obliviousness. A final note on the American situation: the WIC (food stamps program) is the world’s largest purchaser of powdered infant formula, and Thornton writes that the WIC program is weirdly administered by the USDA instead of Health and Human Services, quoting the director of Mothers� Milk Bank in Austin, Texas as explaining,�(It’s) because WIC is a US dairy farmers� subsidization program. Do you think it’s their mission to improve community public health by having more breastfed children? No, they say a whole lot of things, but their mission is to make sure that the bovine industry is alive and well in the USA.� Interesting. Moving on to plastic surgery, Thornton observes as a woman has her implants removed and her remaining breast tissue repaired, and has a fascinating interview with her surgeon. We learn that more trans men than trans women have “top surgery� (likely because the first is covered by insurance while the second isn’t), most women who have a mastectomy opt for implants (again: covered by insurance, so most don’t think too hard about the alternative), and as the majority of plastic surgeons are men, they tend to recommend large implants with 1960’s-era Playboy cartoon upturned nipples (the woman surgeon that Thornton is watching even describes conferences at which the male surgeons still joke about asking men if they want to go up a cup size while their wives are already under sedation. Har har.) But although Thornton appreciates the misogynistic overtones of breast implants, she concludes: While most feminists have seen beauty as a form of submission, others have argued that it is a means of resistance. I think the binary logic of this “structure versus agency� debate is a dead end because the problem is not an either-or. The pursuit of beauty can be both a form of obedience and an effort to subvert and surmount. I read a compelling article by critic Rita Felski, arguing that feminists need to craft thicker descriptions of aesthetic experience so we can balance the political costs of being beautiful with the emotional benefits. Only then can we do justice to the reasons why humans pursue and take solace in beauty. I didn’t take much away from the section on bra designers (other than the evolving history of women’s “intimates� that still keep us covered, and controlled, more than men), and while the final section at the Fool’s Journey pagan restorative retreat did make for interesting reading, it’s tangential to the topic at best: Through being here and researching the place of breasts in spirituality, I have come to understand that there is no necessary opposition between feminism and religion. Women’s emancipation is not exclusively secular. In fact, our liberation may be enhanced by flights of fancy and leaps of faith. Naturally, there’s a lot more information in Tit’s Up than can be included here, but I want to reiterate that this is a very pleasing and pleasant read. It makes a good companion piece to a book I read last year � Butts: A Backstory, on the history of male attraction to the female behind � and as with that book, I think it’s important to stop every now and then and interrogate the culture we’re living in: we may find ourselves in a time of hyperfixation on and sexualization of breasts, but that has not been the case across global cultures and throughout human history. So when a socially acute woman like Thornton makes the decision to include breast implants as a part of her post-mastectomy reconstruction � despite being very aware of the counteracting pressures put upon her by the patriarchy and her sisterhood of feminist friends � we ought to acknowledge, even celebrate, what that decision meant to her own sense of self and mental well-being: When I observe women who relish their cleavage, I am delighted by their good fortune. Breasts and chests are the literal front and center of body positivity....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1646222105
| 9781646222100
| 1646222105
| 3.49
| 4,657
| Jul 09, 2024
| Jul 09, 2024
|
it was amazing
| While the chorus of “Bella ciao� played over and over again, the movement became rhythmic. At first it just wobbled, heating, until it got much hot While the chorus of “Bella ciao� played over and over again, the movement became rhythmic. At first it just wobbled, heating, until it got much hotter than the rest of me, until finally it was blazing and spinning inside my body. And then I understood at once. It was the coin. I had no doubt about it, I just knew. I had put it there when I was little, in the car ride down south. For more than two decades the coin was gone, I didn’t know where it was. And then, for some reason in New York, it was resurrected. Yasmin Zaher is a Jerusalem-born Palestinian journalist and The Coin is her first novel: and it absolutely knocked me off my feet. The main character � a young Palestinian woman: rich and beautiful, newly arrived in NYC to work as a private middle school English teacher (even though she hasn’t read any of the English classics), physically and existentially stateless � is not outwardly a victim of history looking for sympathy. And yet she suffers bizarre, body-based obsessions, and as her actions approach a breakdown, it’s obvious that, despite outward appearances, trauma (both personal and historical) underpin and affect her entire existence. I have never experienced anything like this novel � I don’t believe I have read a book written by a Palestinian author before � and this exposure to other lives and voices is exactly the reason why I read. This might be a bit challenging for those who like bodies to remain sanitised and out of sight, but this is a novel I would urge everyone to read; and especially at this time. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) In the morning I brushed my teeth with a soft toothbrush and my favorite Cattier toothpaste. Then I washed my face with an oil-based cleanser, followed by a water-based cleanser, followed by toner. All imported from Korea, the world capital of skin like porcelain, purity, and nothingness. Two thousand more years of snail cream and you will see a woman’s brain through her face. Then, after drinking a glass of hot lemon water, a glass of lukewarm water, and a cup of coffee, I emptied my bowels. This happened easily, gloriously, requiring no effort or thought, like flipping through an abridged history of the fall of an empire. All out, insides clean. A trust fund orphan (with her brother administering her inheritance back home), the unnamed main character has a strict cleaning and beauty regime, wears a capsule wardrobe of designer clothes (all in black), drinks Chivas, enjoys several lovers, and never goes anywhere without the vintage Birkin handbag (size 35) that she inherited from her mother. The publisher’s blurb explains that this is about her time teaching “with eccentric methods� at a school for underprivileged boys, and how she “gets caught up in a scheme reselling Birkin bags�, and while these are the plot points that keep the novel rolling along, this is so much more about what’s happening inside this young woman and what she wants to share about her thoughts and background with the reader; and that often gets political: � To be honest with you, in New York I saw the dirtiest people I had ever seen, although I’d never been to a third world country. I came from Palestine, which was neither a country nor the third world, it was its own thing, and the women in my family placed a lot of importance on being clean, perhaps because there was little else they could control in their lives. From the presence of the titular coin � a shekel the main character swallowed as a child, which she never knowingly passed, and which she now suspects has lodged itself beneath the skin between her shoulder blades, which she can’t quite reach with her Turkish loofah � to a back-to-nature mania that her breakdown leads to, this is very much about this woman’s body (which is, I suppose, the singular homeland of a stateless person), and the writing about this body is discomfiting, explicitly sensual, and illuminating. The following scene � in which the woman walks naked in the woods outside NYC, while on a trip with her lover Sasha, and is frightened by a deer � seems to hold the key to the whole thing: I come from a land that is a graveyard. For millennia, all kinds of people were born there, they died there, or were killed, and some were even resurrected or reborn. It was bloody, haunted, and doomed, but it belonged to mankind. Nature in America was uncivilized and untamed. I didn’t know how to read it. If a deer was some kind of warning sign, I wouldn’t have known. Before Sasha could see him, the deer turned around and left. I saw his fluffy white tail behind him, like the tail of a rabbit, and all my fear turned into giddiness. Sasha didn’t leave the house to look for the deer, he stayed indoors, keeping a distance from nature. He was a complex man, but you have to understand that everything outside of me only serves a function. Yes, I am a good woman, I respect people, I listen to their voices. Yours too. But this is not Bakhtin’s carnival, this is a centralized nervous system. That last line was so intriguing to me that I had to look into “Bakhtin’s carnival� and learned () that this refers to the theory of Carnivalesque/Rabelasian “writing that depicts the de-stabilization or reversal of power structures…by mobilizing humour, satire, and grotesquery in all its forms, but especially if it has to do with the body and bodily functions…often read as a utopian antidote to repressive forms of power everywhere and a celebration of the possibility for affirmative change, however transitory in nature.� So while I have read and enjoyed Rabelais, and appreciate that form of satire as protest, it feels like a post-modern update for Zaher to explicitly write that this is not Baktin’s carnival, “this is a centralized nervous system�: this is real life, a real trauma-informed breakdown, and I see no reason why Zaher can’t both hearken to the carnivalesque (as a literary tradition) and repudiate it (as a personal experience). I absolutely loved everything about this novel � this is a voice, in both tone and particular POV, that I have never before encountered � and I hope The Coin is read widely upon its release. Full stars, no hesitation. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1984863525
| 9781984863522
| 1984863525
| 3.94
| 319
| unknown
| Mar 26, 2024
|
liked it
| “Hope is the pillar that holds up the world,� Pliny the Elder is supposed to have observed. “Hope is the dream of a waking man.� Go looking for hop “Hope is the pillar that holds up the world,� Pliny the Elder is supposed to have observed. “Hope is the dream of a waking man.� Go looking for hopeful climate stories and they turn up everywhere. H is for Hope is like a picture book for adults, with twenty-six essays written by noted science writer Elizabeth Kolbert� accompanied by charming illustrations by Wesley Allsbrook � one for each letter of the alphabet (which sounds like the topics could be cutesy or strained, but they’re really not), and the core message really is about hope. Kolbert makes the case that action is needed on climate change (several of these essays are blunt about the challenges we’re facing), but she also writes about all of the wonderful projects (electrification, “green� concrete, opportunities for large developing economies like India’s to “leapfrog� over fossil fuel use straight to more sustainable energy sources) that are currently taking place, and hopefulness is the point (under N for Narratives, Kolbert stresses that we need to be careful how we discuss climate change: “A diet of bad news leads to paralysis, which yields yet more bad news�, yet, “People who believe in a brighter future are more likely to put in the effort required to achieve it.�) As I read a digital ARC, I’d be very interested to see what a physical copy of this book would look like � it will be shelved in Science and Nature alongside Kolbert’s other books, but will this be more like a graphic novel? A coffee table book? � and as much as I did enjoy reading this, I’m left bemused as to who might buy a copy. (Usual warning that, as I read an ARC, passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Kolbert begins at A for Svante Arrhenius (who first proposed the link between carbon dioxide and climate change in 1894; he imagined that living under “a warmer sky� would be delightful, but probably 3000 years in the future): It’s easy now to poke fun at Arrhenius for his sunniness. The doubling threshold could be reached within decades, and the results of this are apt to be disastrous. But who among us is really any different? Here we all are, watching things fall apart. And yet, deep down, we don’t believe it. And ends the essay collection at Z for Zero (with a discussion of the Hoover Dam, ground “zero� for climate change in the US, the construction of which was authorised in 1928, just a year after Svante Arrhenius� death) and I didn’t previously know that the Colorado River has been experiencing a “megadrought� since 1998: From the observation deck, the drought’s effects were scarily apparent. An abandoned dock lay, in pieces, high above the lake’s edge. Instead of being submerged, the power plant’s four intake towers stuck up in the air, like lighthouses. The steep walls of the reservoir, which in pre-dam days formed Black Canyon, were lined in an enormous black stripe � a geological oddity known as the bathtub ring. The ring, composed of minerals deposited by the retreating waters, runs as straight as a ruler, mile after mile. At the start of the drought, the stripe was as high as a giraffe. By 2015, it had grown as tall as the Statue of Liberty. In 2022, it reached the height of the Tower of Pisa. The water level was so low that the dam's generators could operate only sporadically. And along the way, there are many hopeful bits, as here with J for Jobs: Recently, a Princeton-based team issued a report detailing how the United States could reduce its net emissions to zero by 2050. The researchers considered several possible decarbonization “pathways�. The one labelled “high electrification� would, they projected, eliminate sixty-two thousand jobs in the coal industry and four hundred thousand in the natural-gas sector. But it was expected to produce nearly eight hundred thousand jobs in construction, more than seven hundred thousand in the solar industry, and more than a million in upgrading the grid. I like the idea of spreading a hopeful message � it can only help to combat paralysing fatalism � so maybe the point is to have books like this, with bite-sized info, laying around for people to flip through and get inspired. It can’t hurt. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1922790982
| 9781922790989
| 1922790982
| 3.80
| 887
| 2021
| Jun 04, 2024
|
really liked it
| Something inside the boy crumbles, a hesitancy, a fear, and he surrenders to the car’s movements, surreptitiously seeks to make contact with the fa Something inside the boy crumbles, a hesitancy, a fear, and he surrenders to the car’s movements, surreptitiously seeks to make contact with the father, to touch him through the leather jacket in a tentative, clumsy attempt to convey his affection � or what he considers the affection expected of a son for his father, of a child for this man, this stranger who, out of the blue, has been designated his father. I read The Son of Man in a new English translation (the French original was released in 2021), and while author Jean-Baptiste Del Amo has much to say about the universal human condition (and in particular, the relationships between fathers and sons going back to the dawn of man), I found there was something slightly lost in translation between this story set in recentish (it seems before cell phones and internet) rural France and where I find myself today. Still: I found myself very invested in the modern day timeline (whose heart wouldn’t go out to a nine year old boy meeting his dangerous father for the first time?), and while I didn’t find the plot to be exactly surprising, I thought that the storytelling was very compelling and flowed logically to prove the point that Del Amo appeared to be making about what fathers can’t help but pass down to their sons. This touched me, heart and mind, and I can’t ask for more. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages might not be in their final forms.) The leader stops, looks up at the sky and, for an instant, the black disc of his pupil aligns with the white disc of the sun, the star sears the retina and the creature crawling through the matricial mud turns away to contemplate the valley through which he is trudging with others of his kind: a landscape whipped by winds, sparse undergrowth dotted here and there with shrubs that have a mournful air; over this bleak terrain floats the negative afterimage of the day star, a black moon suspended on the horizon. This opening paragraph � and the scene that follows, with a group of primitive hunters (including a father and adolescent son with “eyes that are deeply sunken in sockets chiselled beneath the prominent brow ridge�) on a deer hunt � made me think, “Whoa, I didn’t know I was reading a book set in prehistory.� But after a deer is taken, the narrative goes from “The young hunter bends down and picks up his spear� and shifts, within a paragraph, to: “In the backseat of the battered old estate car, the son is dozing.� Del Amo plays with the timeline throughout � we first meet this family (father, mother, and son) as they drive towards some unnamed destination, and then rewind to the father suddenly (creepily) inserting himself into the mother and son’s happy lives � and it takes the entire novel of shifting around in the timeline to answer all of the questions that this setup presents. This format was really well done. As it turns out, this reunited family is making their way towards the incredibly remote mountain property named Les Roches (which sounds impressive but it’s a dilapidated barn conversion) where the father was raised by his own possessive, grief-ridden, paranoid single father; and as the trio tramps up the mountain at night, overburdened with the backpacks the man has assigned to them, the questions keep coming, and Del Amo eventually answers them all. This is, at heart, a story of a nearly feral, antisocial man who suddenly decides to assert parental rights over a sensitive boy who had been raised by a very young, well-meaning, loving single mother; and not only does Del Amo demonstrate how the father’s worst traits were learned from his own father, but situations between the father and son chime right back to the dawn of man (including the solar eclipse described in that last passage.) The theme is impressively supported by the plot. A note on the translation: there was a weird formality to some of the language that sometimes made me wonder if the translator (Frank Wynne) was really capturing the sense, instead of the literal translation, of Del Amo’s writing; would a reader of the original have needed to look up definitions as they encountered that original primitive band of people described as a “tatterdemalion herd�, or when “the tarpaulin inflates and crumples with the rustle of an elytron�, or perhaps most egregiously, “The crabbed flesh of her genetrix was always forced into severe skirts that never came above her knee.� (That last can almost be forgiven because, as Del Amo never gives formal names to his characters, there are only so many ways to say “the woman� or “the mother�, but an English writer would never use “genetrix�.) I found it distracting. There are other stars, he says, other planets, some so dark that no sun ever reaches them, and beyond that, there are other galaxies, thousands of them, and each galaxy contains billions of suns, billions of planets, and beyond everything that is visible, he says, there are hundreds of billions of galaxies. There’s a lot of pain and drama in this story, but it doesn’t come from nowhere; Del Amo held my attention throughout and totally nailed the landing. Recommended! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
006339295X
| 9780063392953
| 006339295X
| 3.92
| 685
| Mar 28, 2024
| Apr 30, 2024
|
really liked it
| Alone, we had become the lies he had told us. Together, we were learning to unravel it. We were building the chain. We were learning to replace him Alone, we had become the lies he had told us. Together, we were learning to unravel it. We were building the chain. We were learning to replace him with ourselves. In January of 2017, after leaving the clinic room in which she had taken the first dose of the abortifacient that her boyfriend had talked her into, Chimene Suleyman discovered that this boyfriend � the love of her life � was never who she thought he was, and now he was gone; leaving nothing behind but a text telling her that she was now ruined and unworthy of love. Suleyman would eventually learn that this man (never named) similarly ruined the lives of dozens of other women � defrauding some of them of tens of thousands of dollars � and by growing a mutually supportive community with these other victims, Suleyman was able to eventually find a place of healing from which to examine the persistent systems of misogyny that allow men like this to escape consequences. The Chain tells Suleyman’s story (as well as some details from other women’s relationships with this man), examines how society celebrates the playboy (while denigrating the women who get played), and concludes that women (and especially in the wake of the #MeToo movement) can find the power to fight back against this type of toxic masculinity when they band together, share their stories, and support one another. The details of Suleyman’s story are shocking and compelling, but it’s the thoughtful social commentary that makes this an elevated read. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I reached for my keys, but put them away. I turned the handle on my apartment door and expected, rightly, that it would open. The shirts he left in my closet were no longer there. His T-shirts that had filled the bottom drawer, gone. His sneakers that had formed a neat line against my shoes, and some of my belongings too, gone with him. No one should love me. And I believed him. Because I had been taught to. There’s a lot going on in this memoir: Suleyman is of Turkish Muslim heritage (not white but “white-passing�; what this boyfriend called “sandy�) and had emigrated to America from the Britain she was raised in. Suffering from Depression, a recent breakup, and other pressures from feeling isolated in NYC, Suleyman was a perfect target for this man who liked to lovebomb new girlfriends and then beg understanding for his own mental health challenges (claiming to have been diagnosed with Agoraphobia and Autism); what started as fun and exciting became this man needing to be taken care of, and if the woman had money, he’d clean her out for supposed stays in mental health care facilities or travel money to get to the big job that would allow him to pay her back. He accidentally-on-purpose got more than one woman pregnant (and talked them into abortions that not all of them wanted), he made a habit of taking pictures of his girlfriends sleeping nude without their consent (sometimes sharing them in a group chat with his buddies), and he routinely disappeared when the fun stopped. As a stand-up comedian, a lot of his material was about how dumb women are (four nights before her abortion, Suleyman thought that her boyfriend was sitting with his mother in Atlanta as she was dying, but he was actually in NYC doing a set about how much he hates Muslims), and it was a revelation for Suleyman to watch YouTube videos of his standup routines, in the aftermath of their breakup, and hear men in the audience guffawing at the most unfunny misogynist lines: Comedy is an invisibility cloak for the men who hate women. It’s not objectification, it’s social commentary! It’s not chauvinism, I’m in character! It’s not a rape joke, it’s intellectual critique! It’s not bullying, it’s risqué! It’s not harassment, it’s banter! It’s not a slur, it’s a play on words! “Good� comedy is meant to push boundaries, meant to shock, meant to provoke. If you don’t like it, maybe you’re too sensitive, too literal, maybe you’re just not smart enough to get it. Suleyman makes the point that while we might be shocked by the extent of the abuses committed by the likes of Harvey Weinstein and Jeffery Epstein, popular entertainers like R. Kelly (in the lyrics of his songs) and Jimmy Savile (in countless interviews) told people exactly who they were and what they got up to, and the world just sang and laughed along (as underage victims of sexual abuse were silenced by this apparent cultural acceptance of their experience). Suleyman discusses quite a few male celebrities, and while I think it’s fair to examine the abuses of Bill Cosby and Louis CK (and maybe to a lesser extent, allegations made against Aziz Ansari), I don’t know if it is fair to lump Robert Downey Jr and Mark Wahlberg in with Chris Brown as similarly forgiven for past crimes (or to list celebrities like Ernest Hemingway, John Lennon, Johnny Cash and Russel Brand as all using the depression they suffered as an excuse for the women in their lives to clean up the chaos they created). It all makes the larger point, however, that when we excuse celebrities of their bad behaviour, we are setting a standard for how the unfamous are treated: many of the boyfriend’s buddies were disgusted when they found out that he had taken these women for so much money, but Suleyman demands to know why they weren’t similarly disgusted by how he used their bodies. The antidote, according to Suleyman, is for women to get loud, tell their stories, and join together; if men, and the society they continue to dominate, don't care about the mistreatment of women, women need to focus on caring for each other: There is no singular experience of womanhood and we create the chain to remind ourselves of this. We stand beside each other in such a way that we may say, Tell me your story as a woman, and yours, and yours, and yours. I do not know what it is to be a Jewish woman, a Black woman, or trans, or gay, or disabled, or a sex worker, or a prisoner, or a pilot, or a seamstress, or four husbands deep (yet). Where I fall in our flawed verses of womanhood is that I am unlucky in some ways and fortunate in others. What we share is history. What we share is the need to talk, to say we made it or we didn’t. Survival isn’t enough and it musn’t be. Overall, a compelling read. If I had a complaint: I don’t mind that Suleyman chose not to name the boyfriend, but I didn’t like that every “he, him, or his� she used to refer to him was italicised (I was mentally emphasising the word every time, and it became distracting), and similarly, she italicised “the chain� every time as well, and that felt cutesy and disempowering. Small complaints, good read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0374610045
| 9780374610043
| 0374610045
| 3.57
| 4,173
| Jun 18, 2024
| Jun 18, 2024
|
liked it
| Mauro sprang to his feet as we approached and congratulated us on finding the restaurant. I’m afraid the others might not solve the riddle so quick Mauro sprang to his feet as we approached and congratulated us on finding the restaurant. I’m afraid the others might not solve the riddle so quickly, he said. It’s typical of this city’s attitude to fashion, he said, that the most desirable meeting place should also be impossible to find. Not so impossible, Julia observed, since they found it. It’s the parade that has confused everything. Obviously, Rachel Cusk is smarter and more sophisticated than I am, and despite the fact that I am always struck by how wonderfully constructed her sentences are, I’ve only ever given one of her novels (Second Place) more than three stars: the wonderful sentences stack up and up into something that whooshes right over my head. Because Parade is primarily about art and artists, I’ll use the analogy that I much prefer Impressionism to Realism (in both painting and literature), and while I might appreciate elements of Abstract art on an intellectual level, it doesn’t speak to my soul; and what Cusk is doing in her work to “disturb and define the novel� strikes me as closest to the Abstract. This novel that reads like a series of essays or vignettes � a shifting parade of artists, all named “G� � repeats themes of doubling and mirroring, death and violence, having children and losing parents, and it all seems to add up to a commentary on gender and artmaking � and I say “seems� because coming right out with a point seems to be beside the point (which is not a fatal flaw, just hard for me to connect with). As an intellectual exercise, I am enlarged for having picked this up, but when it comes down to taste, this isn’t exactly my thing. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) It occurred to me in the time that followed that I had been murdered and yet had nonetheless remained alive, and I found that I could associate this death-in-life with other events and experiences, most of which were consequences in one way or another of my biological femininity. Those female experiences, I now saw, had usually been attributed to an alternate or double self whose role it was to absorb and confine them so that they played no part in the ongoing story of life. Like a kind of stuntman, this alternate self took the actual risks in the manufacture of a fictional being whose exposure to danger was supposedly fundamental to its identity. Despite having no name or identity of her own, the stuntman was what created both the possibilities and the artificiality of character. But the violence and the unexpectedness of the incident in the street had caught my stuntman unawares. Cusk has written about having been “brained� by a strange woman in Paris, and Parade would seem to be an expansion (in themes and format) of the short story she had based on that event, . Rotating between third person accounts of various artists (G the painter whose style evolved into painting upside-down landscapes, prompting a female novelist to lament, “G was not the first man to have described women better than women seemed able to describe themselves.� � or G the sculptor who made amorphous figures out of fabric, “It seemed to lie within the power of this G’s femininity, to unsex the human form.� � or the Black artist G, “By painting a small picture of a cathedral, G appeared to be making a comment about marginality. In the eye of this beholder, the grandiosity of man was thwarted: his products could be no bigger than he was himself .�) and various first person accounts (of everyday life and travel and family demands), this is more about the artists� common humanity than what they created. (Many of the artists who appear, despite all be named “G� in the novel, are identifiable as real people by their work, but masking their identities seems to be in keeping with Cusk’s attempts to write herself, as the author, out of her novels). There is no overall plot, but the episodes recounted reinforce themes of gender disparity, artistic vision, and family dynamics. Again: Cusk has much to say and her sentences are masterful �
Two of the artists that Cusk writes about seem to be achieving in their preferred media the “effaced narrator� that Cusk strives for in her writing. There is the painter, G: “She painted a number of big oils that showed a seamless, almost featureless surface, quietly undulating like the surface of the sea. They seemed to hang mutely and pacifically between death and life. They proposed something non-human, a spiritual quest.� And the film-maker, G: His style, so uninterfering, drew attention to itself without meaning to. He rarely, for instance, showed his characters in close-up, believing that this was not how human beings saw one another. His films had no particular aesthetic. They often took place in public spaces, and his characters seemed barely to notice that they were being watched. They wore ordinary clothes and rarely looked at the camera. They were absorbed in their own lives. For those accustomed to the camera’s penetration of social and physical boundaries and the strange authority of its prying eye, this absence of what might be called leadership was noticeable. People were often baffled or even angered by his films. They expected a storyteller to demonstrate his mastery and control by resolving the confusion and ambiguity of reality, not deepening it. These two creations (an “almost featureless� painting and a film without a narrative that deepens the ambiguity of reality) are fairly analogous to how I perceived the construction of the “almost featureless� Parade � and that may very well be genius and genre-defining, but personally, I need more there there; whoosh, right over my head. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 05, 2024
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Mar 05, 2024
|
Hardcover
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
![]() |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.33
|
liked it
|
Mar 08, 2022
not set
|
Sep 20, 2024
|
||||||
3.74
|
liked it
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
||||||
3.80
|
really liked it
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
||||||
3.01
|
really liked it
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.87
|
really liked it
|
Apr 20, 2024
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
||||||
4.35
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
||||||
4.32
|
really liked it
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Apr 15, 2024
|
||||||
4.09
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 14, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
||||||
3.54
|
really liked it
|
Mar 20, 2023
not set
|
Apr 08, 2024
|
||||||
4.00
|
really liked it
|
Apr 07, 2024
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
||||||
3.60
|
really liked it
|
Apr 03, 2024
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
||||||
3.46
|
liked it
|
Mar 28, 2024
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
||||||
3.90
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 25, 2024
|
Mar 22, 2024
|
||||||
3.78
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 19, 2024
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
||||||
3.69
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
||||||
3.49
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
||||||
3.94
|
liked it
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
||||||
3.80
|
really liked it
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
||||||
3.92
|
really liked it
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
||||||
3.57
|
liked it
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Mar 05, 2024
|