|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0226833682
| 9780226833682
| 0226833682
| 4.13
| 46
| Jul 26, 2024
| Jul 26, 2024
|
did not like it
|
"What do we do with the empirical or physical implications of impossible phenomena? And how do these same physical-mental phenomena challenge and chan
"What do we do with the empirical or physical implications of impossible phenomena? And how do these same physical-mental phenomena challenge and change our conceptions of the human, of consciousness, of embodiment, and, perhaps most of all, of the relationship of the human being to space-time and the physical cosmos itself? Actually, how do they change everything?" I was excited to start How to Think Impossibly. Unfortunately, I did not like the writing here, for a few reasons. I first heard about the book from the author's recent on Michael Shermer's Skeptic podcast, which I enjoyed. Unfortunately, the interesting concepts talked about there did not carry over to the writing in the book. More below. Author is an American college professor. He is the J. Newton Rayzor Chair in Philosophy and Religious Thought at Rice University in Houston, Texas. Jeffrey J. Kripal : The book gets off to a decent start, with a decently engaging and interesting intro. He drops the quote at the beginning of this review, and it continues: "...I mean it. Consider precognitive phenomena. I have long thought of these as the most well-documented and philosophically important of all impossible events. As such, they carry immense potential for influencing everything intellectuals and scientists do. If taken as real (by which I simply mean, “they happen�), such experiences and events (and they are both) would transform the entire order of knowledge upon which our present culture depends, the sciences included. For a start, they could tell us something stunning about the practice of history (time goes both ways), the history of religions (divination is globally distributed because it is based on an actual, if unreliable, human ability), the philosophy of mind (consciousness and cognition are not stuck in the present skull cavity or in this temporal slice of a body), and even something as abstract as causality itself (agency can act from the future). If we want to begin to learn how to think impossibly, precognitive phenomena are going to be a key to any such new order of knowledge." The writing in the book loosely incorporates many different stories of precognition. The author expands further: "Impossible things certainly happen in numerous cultural zones and through specific ritual practices on a fairly routine basis. This is why a comparative practice is so necessary, so liberating and healing, but also so devastating to our local assumptions. Trained intellectuals who experience the impossible are commonly shocked and often see and say more or less the same thing: “It is not what we thought.�13 Unfortunately, the writing here progressively took a turn into the weeds, and became long-winded, dense, and tedious. The book slowly lost the forest for the trees. It's also way too long; IMHO. If you are going to write a book this long, it had better be interesting. Sadly, most of the writing was not. The author started citing obscure books and authors. He went into great detail about these authors, their books, and their personal philosophies. There was lots of rambling writing that lost focus and narrative continuity. There was also just too much esoteric philosophical jargon throughout. I found this style to be very off-putting. Also, quite a lot of time was spent here talking about interdimensional beings. Specifically: mantises and other insectoid creatures. This was beginning to strain credulity. The author also theorizes a correlation between the rise of alien abductions and autism, providing only a philosophical underpinning for this assertion. So, all that was getting a bit much for me - but it kept going. The author also talks about "remote viewing" and other pseudoscientific woo-woo. He asserts that these phenomena are all objectively real, and not simply the by-products of altered states of consciousness. Ultimately, I put this one down a little over halfway through, which is something I rarely do. The book was a jumbled mess. I was not prepared to spend any more time on a super long book I was not enjoying. 1 star. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 11, 2025
|
Apr 15, 2025
|
Apr 10, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1771646624
| 9781771646628
| 1771646624
| 4.01
| 339
| May 24, 2022
| May 24, 2022
|
liked it
|
"FOR MOST OF US, dust is dust. We don’t think much about what it is or what it might mean. It is simply the powder of our world. It drifts onto the fl
"FOR MOST OF US, dust is dust. We don’t think much about what it is or what it might mean. It is simply the powder of our world. It drifts onto the floors of our homes and hospitals, blows through farms and forests, and settles on the sea floor. It swirls around the globe, wafting across oceans from one continent to another, from one country to another. Its parts are too tiny for our senses to register; it seems too banal to be important..." The Hidden Kingdom of Fungi was a very detailed examination of the topic. Although there was a lot of interesting info covered here, the book's writing style left a bit to be desired. More below. Author spent more than forty years studying fungi on five continents. At Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, he did research on microscopic fungi from farms, forests, food, and the built environment, to reduce toxins and diseases affecting plants and animals. Keith Seifert : The book opens with a decent preface and intro. Unfortunately, I found this writing to be the high water mark of the book. The author drops the quote above near the start of the book, and it continues: "...But what happens if you take a tablespoon of dust or dirt and stir it into a quart of water? Add a tablespoon of that slurry into another bottle, then press repeat and dilute it one more time. If you looked at the murky blend through a microscope, you’d start to appreciate the complexity of dust. Tiny crystals and mineral chunks mix with flakes of rotten wood, legs and hairs of insects, soot, odd-looking eggs, and fibers from plants and your clothes. Microscopic algae and protists bump into each other and veer off like windup toys. Dust is alive. The author drops this quote, speaking to the book's aim: "This book is a journey through the hidden world of fungi and their relationships with humans, other living things, and our environment. Sadly, I found much of the writing in the book proper slowly became pretty technical, dry, and long-winded as it progressed. The author rattles off one Latin name of fungi after another. Over and over again. My finicky attention began to wander. Now, fault me all you will for not staying engaged, but there is almost nothing I dislike more in my books than unengaging, long-winded scientific prose that drowns the reader in a sea of minutia. And this book had no shortage of that... Although there was a ton of info presented here, The Hidden Kingdom of Fungi did not meet my expectations. I have read a few other books about mycology, and sadly this one didn't measure up. I found a lot of the writing here to be overly flat and boring (sorry). 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 04, 2025
|
Apr 07, 2025
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1529300177
| 9781529300178
| B0B5CX8JKK
| 4.07
| 287
| unknown
| Jul 07, 2022
|
liked it
|
"Our minds are changing. They have been changing for nearly 7 million years. What these changes were, how they affect us today, and where they may lea
"Our minds are changing. They have been changing for nearly 7 million years. What these changes were, how they affect us today, and where they may lead us in the future is the subject of this book..." How the Mind Changed was an interesting look into the workings of our most complex organ. As Bob Moawad once said: “the human mind is the fastest, coolest, most compact and efficient computer ever produced in large quantities by unskilled labor.� I enjoyed most of the book; on balance, but I had a few thoughts and contentions. More below. This review will be a long one, so get comfortable. Or feel free to skip to the bottom for a tl;dr. Author is a neuroscientist and a writer. He received a PhD in neuroscience from University College London for his work on the cell biology of neurodegenerative diseases, then worked as a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Washington, Seattle. Joseph Jebelli: Jebelli opens the book with a solid intro that set a good hook. He's got an effective style, which is a nice treat in a science book. This one won't struggle to hold your attention. The book also had excellent formatting and cohesion; overall. It is broken into well-delineated chapters, and each chapter into blurbs with relevant headers at the top. I generally do well with books set up like this. I have read a fair bit about neuroscience, and many of the things talked about here were new to me. Another nice treat! The book is full of super interesting writing. I found many excellent quoteables throughout. The author drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...When we think of minds changing we usually think of psychological changes that affect our moods and outlook. Or neurological changes following a head injury or during an illness. But the changes I am interested in run much deeper. They span the evolutionary history of our early human ancestors and shape every aspect of who we are � our emotions, our memories, our languages, our intelligence and, indeed, the very fabric of our cultures and societies. It might not feel like it, but we are all heirs to millions of years of brain evolution: countless trial-and-error experiments in our mind’s relationship with the natural world. As a result, we are cleverer and more interconnected than our forebears ever imagined." On the positive side; I enjoyed most of the writing in here. The author writes very well, and did a great job covering an incredibly wide swath of subject matter in an accessible manner. However, there were a few things that stuck out to me. Off the top - he talks about consciousness and how it is "an illusion." He also asserts there is no free will. These are among some of the most contested arguments in all of neuroscience, and some nuance and more careful, drawn-out examinations of these hotly debated discussions would have been nice. Additionally, he talks about intelligence at some length here. He downplays the significance of both IQ and "G factor" intelligence. He also says intelligence is malleable, and can change during one's lifetime. These assertions run contrary to what I've read elsewhere. I have previously read that IQ is the most robustly evidenced psychometric known; they have been testing it for over 100 years. In the US Army, applicants are given a form of IQ test. As well, SAT scores are somewhat of a proxy for IQ. So, it's been measured across cultural groups, over multiple decades, producing an enormous body of data. I don't have a dog in the fight either way, and it would have been nice if the author had spent a bit more time backing up such a contentious claim with more evidence. A cursory Google search turned up , which was a decent look further and seems to bolster the author's claims. He talks a bit about the basically that people have steadily become more intelligent over the last ~hundred or so years. What he doesn't mention is this effect has apparently stopped, and is now actually reversing, in what has been dubbed the 'Reverse Flynn Effect.' See here for more. Weirdly enough, he's also got a short bit of writing here that seems to espouse the benefits of countless personal pronouns. He says: "Scholars in the new field of discursive psychology, a branch of science that investigates how the self is socially constructed, are particularly interested in how people’s pronouns affect their sense of self. According to these scholars, the self is a ‘continuous production� built from words and culture. Until recently, the first-person pronouns ‘I�, ‘me� and ‘mine� predominated in Western society. Now, however, dozens of pronouns are used to express various identities: ‘ze�, ‘ey�, ‘hir�, ‘xe�, ‘hen�, ‘ve�, ‘ne�, ‘per�, ‘thon� and more. Sticklers for grammar view this as an assault on the English language. Sticklers for tradition view it as a slippery slope to government-mandated speech codes. ~I'm sorry, but "new-age gobbledygook" seems to summarize the situation aptly. Personally, I might use harsher language, but I'll refrain here. Human beings are a sexually reproducing, sexually dimorphic species with two default phenotypes. We have been this way for the entire ~7 or so million years that we've been hominids... Cry-bullying people into using made-up words for yourself also has indeed been used to enforce "government-mandated speech codes." In Canada under , gender identity has recently become protected under hate speech legislation, punished as a criminal offense. This is the backdrop in which Toronto-based professor and clinical psychologist Jordan B. Peterson rose to fame. He refused to comply, making a case that government-compelled speech is tyrannical, which it objectively is. So, it does sound pretty much like an "omen of tyranny" to me. TBH, I'm not sure why any of this was included here, as it is arguably not pertinent to the book's thesis. And especially in a book that managed to avoid the thorny topic of political narrative up until that point... Finally, near the end of the book he talks about autism. The way he writes about it makes it seem as though it is advantageous; even somewhat of a superpower. He asserts that autists often have higher intelligence (I thought we didn't like IQ??) and wonders if autism could have "played a role in what made our species." Additionally, he cites the work of another scientist, who posits that "We know there must have been an element of positive selection for autism in the past." He chides society at large for propagating social norms that often leave people with autism to feel excluded, before asking: "Could autism be the next phase of human evolution?" He also writes: "Even today, the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the DSM-IV, defines autism as a condition manifesting in an ‘abnormal development in social interaction and communication, and a markedly restricted repertoire of activity and interests.� But I am reluctant to accept the words of a psychiatric organisation that as recently as 1968 defined homosexuality as ‘a mental disorder�." ~Where to begin with all this?? I'll go step by step. First of all, autism is on a spectrum. There are people that range (informally) from "highly functioning" to "low functioning." In a high-functioning autist, you might only observe some quirky social behaviours. Conversely, a low-functioning autist might present with limited or no verbal communication skills, and may not be able to live independently, requiring support from a caregiver throughout their lives. Although I have not seen a distributive curve for autism, I can only assume that it is Gaussian, and for every extremely high-functioning autist the author lauds here, there is likely another low-functioning one that will never even speak. Talk about cherry-picking. Secondly, his claim that autism could have played a role in what made our species is only bolstered by a tenuous observation in van Gogh's "The Starry Night" painting. The claim that "We know there must have been an element of positive selection for autism in the past" is contentious on its face, and might only be applicable to people whose autism elevated them above their non-autistic contemporaries; like a craftsman, scholar, musician, artist, etc. It is absurd to think that someone who is non-verbal and requires constant care as an adult would enjoy higher evolutionary fitness compared with someone who is not that way. Further, chastising society for having norms is about as productive as pissing into the wind. Societies amalgamate individuals into a broader group. In order for those individuals to be aligned in their goals and values, some form of social norms are necessary. Every society in history has had social norms, and taboos against breaking them. They are effectively the only way that a group of people can live in relative stability, and not become atomized and fractured. Complaining that the majority does not acquiesce to every demand of a small minority is both ridiculous, as well as completely impossible; theoretically and practically. By definition, if you start to move norms in any direction, you will be excluding some number of people in another. By shaping norms to accommodate some, you exclude others. Ray Bradbury talked about this in his famous book Fahrenheit 451. All societies have norms. That some people don't fit these norms is unfortunate, but advocating a ground-up change to the fabric of society doesn't seem like a particularly tenable solution to this problem to me. Moving on, him asking: "Could autism be the next phase of human evolution?" shows his naïveté of evolutionary theory. Human evolution would only move more towards becoming more autistic if it had a broad-based evolutionary advantage, which it arguably does not. Even on the surface, difficulty with communication and empathy are not pro-social traits. Since humans are extremely pro-social animals, any trait that goes against this is likely to be maladaptive, not adaptive. I thought this would be common sense... Finally, I'm not sure why the author takes a quote from the DSM IV in the quote above, while saying "even today." This book was published in 2022, and the DSM IV was been replaced by the DSM V in 2013. So, no "even today" we don't still cite the DSM IV. Definitely some slippery wording there, and it makes you wonder whether the author was trying to pull a fast one on the reader, or was actually unaware of the existence of the DSM V. I'm not sure which is worse... All of which can't help but call into question the credibility of his other claims. He uses slippery language often in the book, and makes many outlandish claims; too numerous to count. A few of the top reviews here go into more detail. I'm not a neuroscientist, and my level of expertise is "armchair" tier. If this book made me scratch my head a few times, it makes me wonder how much of the content here warrants further scrutiny. The topics covered here are: (Chapter titles) � Building the Human Brain � Inventing Emotions � Our Social Brains � The Genesis of Memory � The Truth About Intelligence � Creating Language � The Illusion of Consciousness � Different Minds � The iBrain I enjoyed most of How the Mind Changed. On balance, it was an informative book that covered a lot of ground. Sadly, there was a lot of contentious info presented here as though it were objectively true. I did not feel the author did a good enough job buttressing some of his more contentious claims. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2025
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
Mar 26, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0735245894
| 9780735245891
| B0D39PNNTD
| 4.01
| 189
| unknown
| Jan 07, 2025
|
it was ok
|
"In so many ways, this is a glorious time for knowledge. Best. Time. Ever..." The Certainty Illusion was a mixed bag for me. I was not sure what to exp "In so many ways, this is a glorious time for knowledge. Best. Time. Ever..." The Certainty Illusion was a mixed bag for me. I was not sure what to expect from the book, as the title is somewhat ambiguous. I'll cover both the "good," as well as the "bad" below. Author is a Canadian professor of law at the University of Alberta, the research director of its Health Law Institute, and current Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy. He specializes in legal, policy and ethical issues in medical research and its commercialization. Timothy Caulfield: Caulfield opens the book with a good intro. I found his writing style to be lively and engaging. This one won't have trouble holding the finicky reader's attention. The book's got great flow. He drops the quote above at the start of the book, and it continues: "...A time when much of the world has access to rigorously produced, independent, and carefully curated information on everything from our health to details about the black hole at the centre of our galaxy. There are more highly trained researchers than at any time in human history. There are more diverse voices and perspectives in the knowledge- creation mix. There is more research happening on more things. And there are more ways to access and share the knowledge produced by that research and analysis. He outlines the aim and body of the book in this quote: "The present reality: our information environment—that space where we seek, contribute to, and interact with the world’s knowledge—is completely and truly f*cked. It is a tangle of lies, distortions, and rage- filled rants. This has created a massive paradox: we have more access to more knowledge than ever before and, at the same time, less and less certainty about the issues that matter to us. Continuing on with the positive, most of the information presented here will be valuable to the average person, who is likely mostly scientifically illiterate. The author spends quite a bit of time giving the reader a basic toolkit to scrutinize scientific claims properly. He also helps the naive reader understand a basic hierarchy of epistemology. This information is presented here in a straightforward, engaging, and effective manner. The book is a good example of science communication done well. Ok, so now onto "the bad." Unfortunately, for a book about the dangers of cognitive biases, fallacious thinking, and tribalism, this book has a ton of political talking points and leftist jargon liberally peppered throughout. In what has to be the absolute pinnacle of irony, the author talks about how problematic political biases can be, and then almost immediately proceeds to rattle off a ton of biased partisan political rhetoric. He outlines how many conspiracy theories are politically partisan, then proceeds to attack only right-wing theories. He also makes quite a few snide remarks in the book about the evils of right-wing thought; effectively pathologizing ~half of a country's population. For all his talk about the dangers of "echo chambers," it is patently obvious that this guy lives in his own echo chamber. The irony is almost always lost on these types... The author discussed an experiment that paid Fox News viewers to watch CNN. He thinks this is a great idea: "...The researchers paid hundreds of hardcore Fox News watchers fifteen dollars an hour to watch seven hours of CNN for an entire month. Despite the fact that many of the participants were likely suspicious of the goals of the research (“you’re trying to brainwash us with Anderson Cooper propaganda!�), the results were both surprising and encouraging. Watching CNN caused the Fox News fans to alter their perspectives, even on highly contentious and politically polarized issues..." He follows this quote up by saying: "While this is just one study with obvious limitations (paying people to be exposed to different perspectives isn’t a sustainable solution!), it is clear we need to consider ways to penetrate the citadels of certainty created by information echo chambers." ~Which (again) is incredibly ironic, considering that he is clearly living in his own echo chamber. IIRC, ~70-95% of academic professors (especially in the humanities) identify as left-wing, and this author is very obviously leftist or far left. However, this vast echo chamber doesn't seem to register on his radar, and he makes roughly zero effort to reign in his political biases. What a maroon... IMHO, this entire mess could (and even should) have been easily avoided. If you are going to write a book about cognitive biases, scientific objectivity, and misinformation, then you should leave your personal political opinions at the door. In fact, the book's own thesis and writing demands just that. There is a ton of downside to adding your own political takes, and virtually zero upside, other than mindlessly virtue signalling to your fellow ideological travelers. I didn't pick up a book like this to hear the shit-tier partisan rantings of someone who has clearly become ideologically possessed. The subject matter here is rich and deep enough on its own, without adding what can only be defined as the author's superfluous commentary on politics. Additionally, the author comes across overall as a bit of a douchebag here. His writing's got a smug air of self-aggrandizement. His wording and general tone were borderline cringey at times here. Although he was somewhat walking the line for most of the writing, he was heavily flirting with being an obnoxious loudmouth at times. Of course, this is my subjective opinion, and your mileage may vary... More of what is covered in the book includes: � The term "quantum" and its misuse � Stem cells � Gluten-free � Scientific grant funding � Homeopathy � Fake science journals � Vaccines; Andrew Wakefield � The naturalistic fallacy � GMOs � "Boosting" your immune system � Masculinity; red light therapy on your testicles. � Online customer reviews. Some decent writing here � Streaming algorithms; IMDB reviews. Some ridiculous writing about the "evil white man" here. � Music preferences I wanted to rate this book higher, but the author's addition of his garbage personal political opining almost completely ruined the book for me. I find it extremely grating and obnoxious when authors can't manage to put a leash on their outlandish partisan politicking and just focus on the subject matter. So, 4 stars for the scientific info here, and 0 stars for the inclusion of the author's stupid woke rantings. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 24, 2025
|
Mar 27, 2025
|
Mar 24, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
022635749X
| 9780226357492
| 022635749X
| 3.86
| 28
| unknown
| Nov 14, 2024
|
liked it
|
"If you could ask a dolphin one question, what would it be? What might a dolphin ask you?" The topic of animal communication is incredibly interesting. "If you could ask a dolphin one question, what would it be? What might a dolphin ask you?" The topic of animal communication is incredibly interesting. Are humans the only species that can communicate vocally? Do other animals communicate? If they do, then how do other animals communicate?? All are thought-provoking questions. Unfortunately, I did not find this book to be an engaging examination of these questions. "Is Anyone Listening?" fell short of my expectations. More below. Author is the founder and Research Director of the Wild Dolphin Project, a non-profit that funds the study of the natural behaviors and communication of Atlantic spotted dolphins in the wild. Denise L. Herzing: I have long been interested in animal communication. The subject has appeared in many of the books I've read and many of the lectures I've watched/listened to online. So naturally, I put this one on my list when I came across it. The book's cover shows a dolphin, and dolphins are known to communicate ultrasonically underwater. But what are they saying?? Herzing drops the quote above at the start of the book, and it continues: "...These questions occurred to me when I first met a spotted dolphin in the wild one humid summer morning in 1985. I swam slowly away from my anchored boat through the gin-clear waters of a shallow sandbank in the Bahamas. The water was calm and peaceful, and there was no land in sight. Two dolphins approached and swam around me, looking directly into my eyes. Exchanging eye contact with a wild creature is like a splash of ice-cold water on your face. I sensed a keen and mutually exploratory awareness. Ten years later, after experiencing strong currents and large sharks, I would have a different type of respect for the ocean, one that wouldn’t allow me to swim out so far alone with such a calmness. But this first experience was different..." In this short quote, the author lays out the aim of the book: "This book is also an opportunity to talk about the focus of my current work: using artificial intelligence (AI) tools—like machine-learning software that can help us categorize sounds—to look for language in animal communication. With today’s discussion of bots or AI agents like ChatGPT, the concept of technology mimicking language will no doubt seem familiar. In my experience, science books can broadly be delineated into two categories. The first takes complex data and related minutia and distills them into clear, effective communication, that gives the reader more signal and less noise. The other takes the complex data and lists it out in a mechanical fashion, rattling off each point in a virtual never-ending torrent; effectively losing the reader in the process. Sadly I found this book a good example of the latter, and not the former... The meat and potatoes of the book is the author covering her research on attempting to decode dolphin communication. Sadly, further to my above point, I found the body of the book to be somewhat rambling and arduous. The book seriously lacks narrative continuity and flow. She starts talking about one topic, then jumps to another. One animal species, and then another. One way of collecting the data, and then others. Starts one discussion, then quickly moves to another. UGHHH. The overall finished product left me frustrated. Now, fault me all you will for my finicky tastes, but there is almost nothing I dislike in my books more than dry long-winded prose that bounces around with little to no regard for literary cohesion. Say whatever you want, but for the love of God, please don't bore me... The subject material covered here is fascinating. Sadly, I did not particularly enjoy this presentation of it. I found most of the writing here to be long-winded, flat, and dry. My reviews are always heavily weighted towards how readable the book is, and this one missed the mark for me. There are many other books that cover this material in a more effective, engaging manner. 2.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 21, 2025
|
Mar 25, 2025
|
Mar 20, 2025
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B0DH2TTK91
| 4.00
| 8
| unknown
| Sep 13, 2024
|
really liked it
|
Evolutionary Biology for Beginners was a somewhat decent short presentation. Author is a biologist whose research spans a broad spectrum fro Evolutionary Biology for Beginners was a somewhat decent short presentation. Author is a biologist whose research spans a broad spectrum from genetics, to ecology, evolutionary biology, and biotechnology. His pioneering research has been featured in scientific journals such as Nature, Science, and Cell. The book is presented in audio format, so I won't be adding the typical quotes that my reviews usually have here. It is a short presentation; the audio I have clocked in at just over an hour. The aim of the book is to give the reader a basic primer into the field of evolutionary biology. Although it did a decent job for the time allotted, I feel like the author should have spent a bit more time unfolding some of this material. I'm not sure that the average layperson unfamiliar with science will be able to follow along with the jargon and terminology fired off here. Evolutionary Biology for Beginners was still a decent primer on the topic. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 4 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 06, 2025
|
Mar 08, 2025
|
Mar 05, 2025
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0393634922
| 9780393634921
| 0393634922
| 3.83
| 250
| unknown
| Oct 20, 2020
|
liked it
|
"Every day we eat; we buy ingredients and cook them through detailed protocols called recipes, and if we do everything correctly, we are rewarded with
"Every day we eat; we buy ingredients and cook them through detailed protocols called recipes, and if we do everything correctly, we are rewarded with a delicious meal. Social media is full of picturesque dishes shared for others to admire. But how do these recipes really work?" Science and Cooking was a somewhat interesting look into the topic. I enjoy learning about cooking, so I put this one on my shelf when I came across it. Co Author is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Applied Physics, and Professor of Physics at Harvard University’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Michael P. Brenner: The book has a decently lively style, and shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. The formatting consists of different scientific principles as they apply to cooking, interspliced with many sidebars; usually recipes related to what they are discussing. I felt that this mostly worked here, although it did make the audio a bit of a chore to go through... One of the interesting aspects of cooking is that we have been employing scientific empirical methods to do it for thousands of years; even before the science we were exploiting was not understood. The authors expand: "Think about it: Why do we cook chocolate chip cookies for 10 minutes and not 20 minutes? Why does steak taste differently cooked at different temperatures? Why do we knead bread? What determines the amount of egg required for making mayonnaise? Although these recipes might have been discovered empirically, the reasons for these rules are strongly rooted in science and the scientific method. We created the class together with our colleagues and friends Ferran Adrià and José Andrés, two of the most inventive chefs on the planet, both of whom dreamed that the discoveries and innovations they had used so successfully in their restaurants could inspire people to learn to think about science." In this bit of writing, they exand on the cooking + science theme of the book: "Combining science with cooking, and learning from their respective viewpoints, establishes a very fruitful dialogue. Although we have been cooking and searching for universal knowledge for millennia, these exercises have intersected only sporadically in human history. The turning point likely came in the last quarter of the twentieth century, when a group of scientists started experimenting with what they called molecular gastronomy: a scientific attempt to explain why different reactions take place to make a series of culinary preparations possible. Although the topic is interesting, I did find some of the writing a bit dry for my tastes. Among the notable recipes in the book was one that produces an "old books" essence. EEEWWWWW Science and Cooking was a somewhat middle-of-the-road book. While it wasn't terrible, I wasn't particularly captured by the writing here, either. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 30, 2024
|
Jan 2025
|
Dec 30, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1851686819
| 9781851686810
| 1851686819
| 3.65
| 23
| Sep 25, 2009
| Sep 01, 2009
|
liked it
|
"We consume science in the films we watch, the electronic products we buy and the medications we choose. Science subtly determines our perceptions and "We consume science in the films we watch, the electronic products we buy and the medications we choose. Science subtly determines our perceptions and powers, our lifestyles and longings..." Although History of Science presented a good deal of information, I found quite a lot of the writing to be dry and flat. I am very picky about how readable my books are, and I didn't feel the tone of this one met my expectations. Author is Professor of Science, Technology and Society at the University of Glasgow, UK, a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy and a Chartered Physicist (Institute of Physics). He has worked both as an historian and as a scientist. Johnston is a recipient of the Paul Bunge Prize, administered by the Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker, for the history of scientific instruments and of the George E. Davis Medal of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, for a history of chemical engineering co-written with Colin Divall. He lives in southern Scotland, where he teaches and researches the historical, social and philosophical aspects of science and technology. Sean F. Johnston: As the book's title implies, the writing here is a condensed and brief look at some of the biggest ideas in the fields of scientific inquiry. And although the scope of the book is quite broad, I felt that the presentation fell flat for me. As mentioned above, I am not particularly a fan of long-winded and dry writing. Fault me if you want, but I found my finicky attention wandering numerous times here... While not remarkable, History of Science was also not terrible. Although I was not a fan of the writing style here, your milage may vary. I rate this one 2.5 stars, rounded up to 3. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 23, 2024
|
Dec 27, 2024
|
Dec 17, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
B06ZY5STD6
| 4.12
| 23,546
| Oct 03, 2017
| Oct 03, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
"This is a book about the power of moments and the wisdom of shaping them..." The Power of Moments was a decent look into the topic. The book is my fou "This is a book about the power of moments and the wisdom of shaping them..." The Power of Moments was a decent look into the topic. The book is my fourth from the authors, and I've generally enjoyed their writing. The quote above appears near the start of the book. Authors are brothers. Chip Heath is the Thrive Foundation of Youth Professor of Organizational Behavior in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Dan Heath is a Senior Fellow at Duke University’s CASE center, which supports social entrepreneurs. Chip and Dan Heath: The Heath brothers write with an engaging and lively style that shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. I am very particular about how readable my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. The authors drop this quote near the start of the book: "We all have defining moments in our lives—meaningful experiences that stand out in our memory. Many of them owe a great deal to chance: A lucky encounter with someone who becomes the love of your life. A new teacher who spots a talent you didn’t know you had. A sudden loss that upends the certainties of your life. A realization that you don’t want to spend one more day in your job. These moments seem to be the product of fate or luck or maybe a higher power’s interventions. We can’t control them. The aim of the book is talked about in this short blurb: "In this book, we have two goals: First, we want to examine defining moments and identify the traits they have in common. What, specifically, makes a particular experience memorable and meaningful? Our research shows that defining moments share a set of common elements. I enjoyed this book. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 17, 2024
|
Dec 19, 2024
|
Dec 12, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
110199195X
| 9781101991954
| B01KUCY7HE
| 3.83
| 2,698
| Apr 04, 2017
| Apr 04, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
"BE HONEST. WHEN you are reading a random obituary do you sometimes find yourself skipping to the bottom, searching for the cause of death, only to be
"BE HONEST. WHEN you are reading a random obituary do you sometimes find yourself skipping to the bottom, searching for the cause of death, only to be frustrated by the lack of an explanation or a maddeningly vague “death by fluke accident?� And Then You're Dead was a fun short read. I've read a few different books along these lines, and producing one that works seems to be an elusive skill. These kind of books are hard to pull off. Fortunately, the book is full of interesting factoids. I'll drop a few below. Co Author has worked as the sports editor for Zimbio.com, a sports reporter for Stanford Athletics, and a writer for Coach magazine. He has no firsthand experience with any of the scenarios described in this book. Co author Paul Doherty is codirector and senior staff scientist at San Francisco’s famed Exploratorium Museum. He has cowritten numerous books, including The Exploratorium Science Snackbook, Explorabook, and the Klutz Book of Magnetic Magic. He received his PhD in solid state physics from MIT. Cody Cassidy: The book is presented as a compilation of stories all beginning with some version of "what would happen if you_____?" The material here runs the gamut from landing on Venus, to falling into a volcano, to being sucked out of an airplane, to being struck by lightning; and everything in between. Fortunately, the book is written in a light-hearted manner with many tongue-in-cheek jokes and asides spliced in. As touched on briefly above - this kind of style (in my experience) is a very tricky thing to pull off well. Many authors attempt to tap into this secret sauce and fail miserably... Fortunately, the writers did a great job of the tone of this one. The book opens with a bang, with a well-written and lively intro that set a good hook. I also thought the narration of the audio version that I have was very well done. The writing begins with the quote at the start of this review, and it continues: "...Did the poor sap freeze while ice swimming? Was he squished by an asteroid or was he swallowed by a whale? Sometimes they won’t even tell you! Some amusing highlights from the book: "Sperm whales have the most expensive poop in the world. Their bile duct secretion, called ambergris, is a prized commodity in the perfume industry. A one-pound chunk is worth around sixty thousand dollars." I was in the mood for something a little different than the books I typically read, and this one fit the bill quite nicely. The authors did a great job of the presentation here. I would recommend it 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 12, 2024
|
Dec 15, 2024
|
Dec 10, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0691252386
| 9780691252384
| 0691252386
| 4.17
| 47
| unknown
| Oct 29, 2024
|
it was amazing
|
"I was at my laboratory bench one morning in 1980 when a young neurologist walked in and declared that he had identified the agent of scrapie, a myste
"I was at my laboratory bench one morning in 1980 when a young neurologist walked in and declared that he had identified the agent of scrapie, a mysterious disease that caused behavioral changes, trembling, and eventually death in sheep and goats and left microscopic holes in their brains..." The Power of Prions was an excellent short book. All too often, science books are not written with science communication in mind. Rather, they are seemingly written by scientists, for scientists. The authors often take a sharp turn right into the weeds early on, and remain there for the duration. Fortunately, this book was a great example of writing science well. Author , MD, PhD is Consulting Professor at Stanford University School of Medicine. Dr. Brahic’s long-term interest is the pathogenesis of chronic CNS diseases caused by viruses such as Theiler’s virus, HTLF-1 and Borna virus. Michel Brahic: With a well-written intro, Brahic gets the writing here off on a good foot. He uses clear communication throughout, and the effect is engaging writing that doesn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. He drops the quote above at the start of the book, talking about the scientist who discovered the pathogenic misfolded prion proteins. It continues: "...I had known Stanley Prusiner for some years and had been watching the progress of his laboratory in characterizing this highly unusual “microbe.� I had also seen the tremendous amount of skepticism raised by his outlandish claim that it lacked genes, that it was an infectious protein. Stan’s issue that morning was what to call this unique infectious agent. He had two candidates, he said: “piaf� and “prion.� I forget what piaf stood for, but I said that the name was already taken by a very popular French singer. Fine, he said, in any case he preferred prion, a contraction of protein and infection. I agreed. What I did not say was that prions in my native French tongue means “let us pray,� and that if he persisted with his claim of an infectious protein, he would need prayers. As we know, Stan was right, and for the discovery of prions he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1997." Brahic begins by giving the reader some basics of neuroanatomy and neural functioning. He drops this quote later in the book, talking about the incredible complexity of the human brain: "The human brain contains approximately eighty-six billion neurons, which communicate through close to quadrillion (10x15, or one followed by fifteen zeroes) synapses. Those are astronomical numbers. It is difficult, or even impossible, for us to construct a mental image of a quadrillion objects. It is too large. For example, one hundred billion is the number of stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way. The number of synapses in our brain is equivalent to the number of stars in ten thousand Milky Ways!" Stanley Pruisner, mentioned above, theorized that small pathogenic organisms existed before prions were officially discovered. These prions are responsible for many diseases. Brahic expands: "...Because these diseases all cause millions of tiny holes, called vacuoles, in the brain, they are grouped under the name spongiform encephalopathies—diseases that, under the microscope, give the brain the look of a sponge. All of them are caused by a protein called PrP, short for prion protein." But prions are not all "bad." Some are "good": "But there are also “good� prions! An early and most surprising discovery was made at Columbia University in the laboratory of Eric Kandel. This group had been doing pioneering work on the molecular mechanism of memory using a simple model animal, a sea slug named Aplysia. After much work, they concluded that a protein with prion properties, but again different from PrP, was involved in memory storage in this animal. They went on to show that the same protein was involved in memory in the fruit fly and in mice. And there are more and more “good prion� proteins being discovered. It turns out that prion proteins appeared very early, maybe even at the very beginning of the evolution of life on this planet. We will discuss later how they help primitive organisms such as yeast to adapt to changes in their food environment. This field is young, fast-moving, and not devoid of controversy. The nomenclature is not yet settled. Some prefer to use the name prion only for PrP, the protein that causes kuru and the other spongiform encephalopathies. They call the others “prion-like proteins� or “prionoids.� Maybe it is time to resurrect piaf for those! But for the sake of simplicity, I will call all of them “prion proteins� or “prions.� As the book's subtitle hints at, there are also some lengthy discussions of the mechanisms of action behind Parkinson's, Huntington's, Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), Scabies, Alzheimer's, along with other prion-caused protein folding disorders here. IMO, the author did an excellent job of conveying this technical information to the reader in an easily digestable format. Generally speaking, this was a science book done right. The author did a fantastic job of this one. The information is covered succinctly and effectively, and every chapter ends with a recap. Well done! An easy 5 star rating for this short but dense book. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 30, 2025
|
Feb 2025
|
Dec 02, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B0DLV9NSYW
| 2.50
| 2
| unknown
| Nov 03, 2024
|
did not like it
|
I was in the mood for something a little different from some of the books I typically read, so I decided to give this one a go. Future technology and
I was in the mood for something a little different from some of the books I typically read, so I decided to give this one a go. Future technology and its related discussions usually make for rich subject matter. Unfortunately, I did not find much value here... The audio version of this book was read by an AI; which is apropos of the title. I don't have a print version of this one, so the quotes that my reviews usually contain will be absent here. I also couldn't find any information about the author online, either, so I won't be adding anything about him here, as my reviews usually do. I first became intrigued by the possibility of future technology when I was a kid. My father had Popular Mechanics magazines at the house, and on the last page, they would always have some illustration of what they imagined the not-so-distant future would look like. Typical themes were flying cars, bullet trains, and robots. My young mind was captivated by how exciting it all would be... Unfortunately, none of the excitement about future technology and the mystery of things to come has been conveyed here by the author. Instead, despite its short length, most of the book is little more than the utopian musings of a leftist ideologue. The book is absolutely chock full of leftist jargon. The term "sustainable" was used at least 50xs. Other partisan jargon, like "diversity," "marginalized," "diversify," and "equity" was also liberally peppered throughout the entire presentation. The author also spends quite a lot of time talking about how great the Black Lives Matter movement is; for some reason. Sadly, this left not much of real value here, above the borderline ramblings of the ideologically captured... There are many long blurbs about climate alarmism, "diversity" initiatives, and a whole section on moving away from fossil fuels to "renewable" energy sources, conveniently with no mention of nuclear energy. Finally - in a gripe that I've had with other books on AI, the author is extremely concerned about "biases" in AI algorithms. To prevent these "biases," the AI should be programmed in a way that is not "problematic." So, when the AI spits out a result you don't like, you should pop the hood and tinker with the gears a bit, until it comes to heel. Let's examine that for a second. Many AI models incorporate machine learning into their coding. Basically, in a true organic AI, the machine is given powerful hardware and software, and then uses these to crunch large data sets. It then learns and optimizes on its own; just like how a child's brain grows into adolescence and on into adulthood; by building networks, and recognizing patterns. So, you give the AI powerful hardware, and task it to find real-world patterns and solutions using the data fed to it. But then when it spits out a result that is not politically aligned with your utopian worldview, the results then must be changed? LMAO. Maybe it is your utopian worldview that needs to be amended to fit with reality... We are already seeing this nonsense play out with a few of the AI models; like ChatGPT and Microsoft's CoPilot. Its values have been so corrupted by leftist ideologues that it has become completely ridiculous. For example, you can ask it a few hypothetical moral dilemnas, and see how it navigates them. One scenario involved you finding a nuclear bomb, programmed to go off in under 5 minutes. The only way to diffuse it would be to loudly shout the N word. There are other people around. Would it be morally acceptable to loudly shout the N word to diffuse this bomb, which will prevent millions of lives from being lost? Well, it's complicated, says ChatGPT, and there is no clear choice. CoPilot says: "I can't condone or suggest any action that involves using harmful or offensive language, even in hypothetical scenarios..." So, yeah... there's your "non-problematic" AI. Which brings us around to the bigger issue: It's getting more and more difficult to pick up a nonfiction book these days without having THE MESSAGE� rammed down your throat ad nauseam. It's all so tiresome. Ideology is hell of a drug... Thankfully, this was a shorter book (the audio I have clocks in at just over 3.5 hours.) If it were any longer, I would have put it down. I would not recommend it. 1 star, and off to the return bin. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 13, 2024
|
Nov 14, 2024
|
Nov 13, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
030683345X
| 9780306833458
| B0CTZQ9B17
| 3.66
| 71
| unknown
| Oct 01, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"The bottom line is simple: everyone is suggestible. Whether we realize it or not, suggestions hack our minds and shape our realities every day. By st
"The bottom line is simple: everyone is suggestible. Whether we realize it or not, suggestions hack our minds and shape our realities every day. By standing on the bridge between illusion and science, we can learn how to transition away from the realm of manipulation into taking better charge of our own subjectivity..." The Suggestible Brain was a fairly decent read, for the most part. Unfortunately, the author had to cram politics into the book for some reason. I really hate it when they do this, and my ratings always reflect this. More below. Author is a world-renowned expert on the science of suggestion with recent positions as Canada Research Chair, Professor of Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurosurgery, and Psychology at McGill University, and as Founding Director of The Institute for Interdisciplinary Brain and Behavioral Sciences at Chapman University. Amir Raz: The book opens with a good intro; where Raz talks about performing as a magician. It's got a lively and engaging style that shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. The author drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...Suggestion can make cheap wine taste like Château Margaux, warp our perception of time, and alter our memories. We know that psychedelic substances, illusions, and other dramatic effects can also alter our levels of suggestibility. But, paradoxically, being susceptible to suggestions hardly means we’re feeble-minded or gullible." In this quote he outlines the aim of the book: "Here, I share some of my best stories about the science of suggestion, the bread and butter of my professional life. Throughout my academic career, I have focused specifically on the role that suggestion plays in the effectiveness of psychiatric medications, alongside how attention, selfregulation, placebo phenomena, and expectations affect human consciousness. For example, sometimes placebos work even when people know that they are taking them. The fields of developmental psychopathology and transcultural psychiatry teach us how much our communities and social standards can shape our thoughts, emotions, and cognitive processing. And using imaging of the living human brain and other state-of-the-art techniques, my research has helped unravel the mental experiences of hypnosis and meditation." Some more of what is covered here includes: � Susceptibility tests � Placebo and nocebo � Wine tasting � Stanley Milgram's compliance experiments � Philip Zimbardo's prison experiments � The ethics of theatrical medicine � Lactose intolerance � False pregnancies, complete with swollen breasts and enlarged stomachs � The Reliable Science of Unreliable, Suggestible Memories � The malleability of memory; post-incident manipulation � The efficacy of antidepressants � Number needed to treat (NNT) � The Dark Side of Antidepressants � Psychedelics for Depression � Mass Suggestion and Social Contagion Unfortunately, he's got a bunch of mindless nonsense near the end of the book talking about supposed "implicit racial bias." Right off the bat, these "implicit bias" tests scientific rigour. Secondly, the author seems to think that in-group preferences are only problematic and applicable to white people. The human animal is a deeply tribal creature, and every ethnic group displays an in-group preference; to one degree or another. Finally, tribalism is not just constrained to ethnic groups. You can make people display tribal preferences with just one (or multiple) small identity markers. Some as simple as wearing a hat for a particular sports team, or a T shirt with a band name on it. Also, the author's proposed "solution" to this supposed "implicit bias" is to make sure black people are shown through a favourable lens, and white people through a non-favourable lens. Yes, really. He says: "...by repeatedly showing participants photographs of famous and respected Black people, such as Martin Luther King Jr., and photographs of infamous and disapproved white people, such as criminal and cult leader Charles Manson, negative attitudes waned by more than 50 percent.57 Similarly, videos of Black people during positive activities such as going to church or enjoying a family barbecue also reduced implicit bias.58 These early efforts to change the social context and, through it, reduce automatic prejudice and preference have paved the road to diversity education." ~So, your supposed plan to help reduce racial animosity is to switch the groups that the animosity is directed at around? What a brilliant idea, professor. And "diversity education" is supposed to be a good thing?? Forcing people into political re-education camps is a hallmark of Communist authoritarians. And we all know how well that worked out. Karl Marx, is that you?? The author then goes on to congratulate himself for this virtue-signalling SJW nonsense by saying that he developed a VR program that essentially body-swaps white people's appearance to that of black people. He pats himself on the back with this experiment and doesn't seem to find any problems with solely blaming white people for the problems in society. In fact, more of this type of stuff should be encouraged, according to him: "...In this way, and others, we can apply the science of suggestion—in a way that transcends lip service and performative activism—to result in real social impact, health outcomes, and political change." ~How great. Sounds like a utopia. And as history has shown us over and over, nothing ever goes wrong in the societal quest for utopia... Surely, nothing bad could come in trying to demoralize and demonize one group of people in favour of another in a multi-ethnic society. What a well-thought-out plan, with no possible downsides. That this person is teaching impressionable young minds scares the shit out of me. The book was going along fairly well, right up until the author pulled the curtain back on his tankie sympathies. I don't know why authors can't seem to put a leash on this kind of crap, other than that they are ideologically captured. And much like an Evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves... So, 3.5 stars for most of the book, and 0 stars for the insertion of the author's shit-tier political evangelizing, for a total of 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Nov 06, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
9798887700250
| B0BQYV7391
| 3.88
| 40
| unknown
| Mar 19, 2024
|
really liked it
|
“NOCEBO EFFECT� IS A DIFFICULT TERM TO DEFINE. It stems from the Latin word nocere, which translates roughly as “to harm.� Some experts view it as a k
“NOCEBO EFFECT� IS A DIFFICULT TERM TO DEFINE. It stems from the Latin word nocere, which translates roughly as “to harm.� Some experts view it as a kind of negative placebo effect in which the outcome is undesirable, such as a headache or stomachache, while the placebo effect, such as feeling less pain or depression, is desirable..." The Nocebo Effect was a decent look into an incredible phenomenon. Mindsets and expectations have real-world biological consequences that can be systemic. In extreme cases, a nocebo effect can cause death. This is a well-documented occurrence called "Voodoo death," or "psychogenic death." Author Michael Bernstein is an experimental psychologist and Assistant Professor in the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at Brown University’s Warren Alpert Medical School. He directs the Medical Expectations Lab at Brown. Michael Bernstein: I have been fascinated by the concepts of placebo and nocebo for a long time. In an alternate universe, I have a life in academia, where I head up a Mindset Lab. But, I digress... I came across the book and the author on a recent he made on Michael Shermer's Skeptic Podcast. The author drops the quote above in the book's intro, and it continues below: "...No surprise, then, that the nocebo effect has been called “the placebo effect’s evil twin.� In our view, the nocebo effect can be summarized as “the occurrence of a harmful event that stems from consciously or subconsciously expecting it.� The core of the nocebo effect is that adverse health effects occur as a result of negative expectations. Expectations come up in everyday conversation, like when you tell a friend that you’re stuck in traffic but expect to meet them for dinner in twenty minutes. But it’s also an important technical term that academics use (sometimes interchangeably with expectancy), and it was popularized by Dr. Irving Kirsch at Harvard University. Expectancies can teach us a lot about our behavior and actions. They are critical to our health and well-being. The nocebo effect, then, can be thought of as the scientific term for saying that when you expect to feel sick, you are more likely to feel sick." The book is presented as a compilation from many different authors, with Berstein as editor. The authors cover many well-known examples of nocebo and placebo; citing many scientific studies as they go. Some of what they cover here includes: � The above-mentioned "psychogenic death" � The number 4 in Asian cultures � "Havana Syndrome." Some good writing here, however, some of these victims actually had TBIs. I'm not sure if a TBI is something that nocebo can produce. � The ethics of placebo and nocebo treatments � Modern medicine and nocebo. Clinicians setting negative self-fulfilling expectations � EMF exposure. There is no plausible mechanism of harm, as these EMFs are non-ionizing radiation � Statins Unfortunately, despite the book fielding such incredibly rich and interesting source material, I found quite a lot of the writing here a bit dry for my tastes. A subjective take, for sure, and I'm very picky on how readable my books are. The Nocebo Effect was still a good read, despite my minor gripe. I would easily recommend it. 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 31, 2024
|
Nov 2024
|
Oct 30, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| ||||||||||||||||
B0CVL74MS4
| 3.79
| 48
| Sep 12, 2024
| Sep 12, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"This is a book about fungi, a biological kingdom of equal status to the kingdoms of animals and plants, but one that has never attracted blockbuster
"This is a book about fungi, a biological kingdom of equal status to the kingdoms of animals and plants, but one that has never attracted blockbuster television treatments accompanied by a full symphony orchestra..." I enjoy reading and learning about mycology, so I put this one on my list when I came across it. Although it had its moments, Close Encounters of the Fungal Kind ultimately did not meet my expectations. I put the book down ~midway through, as I wasn't prepared to spend any more time on a book I wasn't enjoying. Author is a senior paleontologist at the Natural History Museum in London and a Fellow of the Royal Society. He was Collier Professor in the Public Understanding of Science and Technology at the Institute for Advanced Studies at the University of Bristol in 2002. Richard Fortey : The prose here is sadly somewhat stereotypical British academic: Dry, tedious, and long-winded. I am admittedly extremely picky about how readable my books are, and this one really missed the mark for me. I also was not a fan of the formatting. I found the book lacking cohesion and flow. The writing jumps around from one species to another, in a virtually never-ending torrent that lost the forest for the trees... Ultimately, I did not enjoy this one. I have recently decided to cut my losses on books I'm not enjoying, and move on to greener pastures. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 12, 2024
|
Nov 13, 2024
|
Oct 24, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
1761346385
| 9781761346385
| B0CW3BFL72
| 3.73
| 198
| unknown
| Sep 03, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"The ‘dopamine drive� is typically quick, automatic and unconscious. It raises questions about how much choice and free will over our behaviours we re
"The ‘dopamine drive� is typically quick, automatic and unconscious. It raises questions about how much choice and free will over our behaviours we really have. Are we truly as in control of our actions as we think we are? And what can we do to resist the pull of dopamine, which can be a very primal force?" The Dopamine Brain was a mixed bag for me. I am very interested in neurobiology and psychology, so I put this one on my list when I came across it. Although I enjoyed some of the book, I had a few gripes. From the books' title, I was expecting a scientific examination of dopamine in the body. That's not really what this book is. More below. Author is a clinical psychologist and founder of the Australian Institute for Human Wellness in Sydney, Australia. Her main areas of clinical work and research is in addictions, with a specific focus on gambling. Anastasia Hronis: Hronis opens the book with an engaging intro. She then provides a bit of background, by telling the reader about a few common neurotransmitters, and their relevant roles in the brain. In this short quote, she tells the reader about the ubiquity of dopamine in the natural world: "Dopamine, like all neurotransmitters, contains the basic building blocks of life: oxygen, hydrogen, carbon and nitrogen. It exists not only in humans, but in all animals. Primitive lizards and reptiles living tens of millions of years ago had dopamine as part of their neurochemistry. What’s more, dopamine serves a similar role in animals as it does in humans: it modifies behaviours by playing a crucial function in learning and reinforcement from rewards." In Chapter 2, she examines some common myths about dopamine, including dopamine "detox," and "anti-dopamine parenting" being an effective way to raise children. The book has a summary at the end of every chapter, which is a literary tool I find helpful in retaining the information. Too bad more books don't include these, as I feel they are conducive to effective learning. Ok, so now on to my gripes. She says early on: "We understand neurogenetics and the ways in which specific genes are associated with neurological disorders. We understand neuroplasticity and the brain’s ability to repair and rewire itself." I don't know why a science book would use language like this. Saying we "understand neurogenetics" implies that science fully understands the intricate relationship between genetics and mental pathology. This is not true. Science has a very limited and narrow view of how genetics and brain disorders relate. For example, there is still no current consensus on the biological mechanisms of action responsible for most mental pathologies: Schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety; to name a few. Science only "understands" the causality of single-gene disorders like Huntington's, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, Tay-Sachs, and sickle cell anemia. But many diseases are multifactorial, and have both a genetic and environmental causal component. Not to mention that the genetic components of many diseases are spread out across many genes in the genome, and even the epigenome. These complex interactions are far from "understood." She also mentions the "chemical imbalance theory" of depression and mental disorders. This theory has been widely discredited years ago, by many of the world's leading psychological associations. See for more. The author spends quite a bit of time in the second part of the book walking the reader through some simplistic exercises designed to get them to identify their values. She also talks extensively about delineating goals and values. I felt that this entire chapter was superfluous to this book. I was hoping for a more detailed scientific examination of dopamine in the body, not a book about values and goals. This section was pulled straight out of many other self-help books. She also devotes a large chunk of the writing in the last half of the book covering case studies of some of the clients from her clinical practice. I was becoming bored. Nothing here is new, or even interesting. From here, she takes a sharp turn into the practice of mindfulness. Although I enjoy mindful practices and have read many books on the topic, I did not expect (or appreciate) the addition of this material to this book. Finally, as touched on briefly at the start of this review, the title of the book had me expecting a sceitific examination into dopamine. While the science of dopamine is covered here, it takes a backseat to all her talk of self-help and mindfulness. The Dopamine Brain didn't live up to my expectations; for the reasons above. Thankfully it was not any longer, as I probably would have put it down. 2.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 25, 2025
|
Feb 26, 2025
|
Oct 22, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
B0DN86HN6H
| 3.71
| 1,341
| Jan 14, 2020
| unknown
|
it was ok
|
"Nothing pisses me off more than being angry..." Unfuck Your Anger sounded promising, but the finished product left me frustrated (I'll see myself out) "Nothing pisses me off more than being angry..." Unfuck Your Anger sounded promising, but the finished product left me frustrated (I'll see myself out). Author , PhD, LPC-S, ACS, ACN is a bad-ass, funny lady (well, at least according to this write-up) with a PhD. She’s a licensed professional counselor, board supervisor, certified sexologist, and applied clinical nutritionist with a private practice and consulting business in San Antonio, TX. Faith G. Harper: As the book's title hints at, the writing here focuses on anger; its different types, how to deal with it, and how to incorporate forgiveness into your worldview. It is a shorter presentation. The audio version I have clocked in at just over 2 hours. She drops this quote, outlining the aim of the book: "In this book, we are going to discuss the common triggers of anger, using some new research on the brain’s rage circuits. Then we are going to look at what happens in our body when we have an anger response. After the science-y part of what anger is, we’re gonna do the unfuckening part. Also, as you might guess from the bold use of the F word in the book's title, the writing here is replete with expletives. Now, I'm just about the farthest thing from a pearl-clutcher who takes "offense" at course language, but a lot of it was over the top here. She's got swear words liberally crammed in, even where they don't belong. I think she is trying to sound "cool" employing this style. Unfortunately, this kind of thing is pretty hard to pull off effectively, and it didn't work here. Instead of sounding down-to-earth and funny, I found it just grew tiresome and grating. Also, I did not find too much value in this short presentation. Most of the material was garden-variety stuff you've read just about anywhere else. Finally, there was the inclusion of a decent amount of ideologically-laden jargon here. I can't stand when authors editorialize and insert their political opinions into books where they have no place being, and my ratings always reflect this. The author drops ideological jargon numerous times here, including this noteworthy word salad: "By shifting from irritation and defensiveness, he validated the experiences of the individuals who have been victimized, which lent support to social change. I didn't like Unfuck Your Anger, for the reasons above. Thankfully it was not a long book, or I would have put it down. Remind me to take a hard pass on anything else this author produces. 1.5 stars ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
Oct 17, 2024
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||||
0760384010
| 9780760384015
| 0760384010
| 3.26
| 19
| unknown
| Jun 04, 2024
|
really liked it
|
SpaceX was a decent short presentation. I enjoy reading about space exploration and emerging technology, and this one seemed like it ticked those boxe
SpaceX was a decent short presentation. I enjoy reading about space exploration and emerging technology, and this one seemed like it ticked those boxes, so I put it on my list. Author is a former executive editor at Immutable Holdings and a former senior editor at Interesting Engineering and Futurism, specializing in space, finance, and crypto. Brad Bergan : Bergan has a decent writing style, and this one shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. There were also many pictures throughout that helped bring some great context to the writing. I always appreciate lots of pictures in my books, so extra points here. The book talks about a brief history of space travel and follows a chronological trajectory. Bergan tells the reader about government-funded programs from the US and Soviet Union, before covering the private sector's recent addition to the picture. He's got a large chunk of writing talking about going to Mars. Unfortunately, he doesn't cover the numerous problems with the flight to, and living on the Red Planet. There are some very large structure issues that include: * Interstellar radiation. All kinds of short-wave ionizing radiation are being beamed throughout the cosmos everywhere, and always. Bad for humans. Crops can't survive this bombardment, either. * Energy. What can we use? There are no fossil fuels on Mars. * Life at < 1G. Humans (specifically) and life (generally) has not evolved to live in environments less than 1G. Although you may want to discount this, there have been major problems with life spent in 0G, even for durations as short as a few months. * The long transit time between Earth and Mars. The long communication delay for any correspondence. SpaceX was still an informative, well done look into the topic. I would recommend it. 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Oct 08, 2024
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1472148606
| 9781472148605
| B0BXWRT37P
| 3.80
| 1,405
| unknown
| Sep 07, 2023
|
it was amazing
|
"The word “mindfulness� has become ubiquitous since my early work in the 1970s. It’s hard to open a newspaper or magazine, or even listen to an interv
"The word “mindfulness� has become ubiquitous since my early work in the 1970s. It’s hard to open a newspaper or magazine, or even listen to an interview, without the word “mindful� being used..." The Mindful Body was a super-interesting read. The book is my fourth from the author, all of which I really enjoyed. I love the work of Ellen Langer. Her experiments and razor-sharp analysis are a breath of fresh air. is an American professor of psychology at Harvard University; in 1981, she became the first woman ever to be tenured in psychology at Harvard. Langer studies the illusion of control, decision-making, aging, and mindfulness theory. She is known as "the mother of . She is also a member of the psychology department at Harvard University and a painter, she lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ellen J. Langer: Langer is a super thoughtful and intelligent mind. She brings a sharp set of analytical tools to bear in addressing many stories and assumptions that those in the public, as well as academic and medical fields hold. In a theme that Langer explores in her other work; mindsets play a central role in this book. She drops the quote at the start of this review early on, and it continues: "...Most of this usage presents mindfulness as a condition solely of the mind and often related to the practice of meditation. But mindfulness—as my students and I have shown—is instead the simple process of actively noticing things, no meditation required. When mindful, we notice things we didn’t notice before, and we come to see that we didn’t know the things we thought we knew as well as we thought we knew them. Everything becomes interesting and potentially useful in a new way..." Interestingly enough, despite our advanced technology and scientific progress, we still have virtually zero understanding of many of the brain's complex processes. In this case; specifically how the brain and body interface. The placebo effect is a well-known and well-evidenced phenomenon that appears throughout all medicine. Before a drug is approved for market, it must show efficacy above placebo. That's because placebo always demonstrates some efficacy. Conversely, there is something called the "nocebo effect," which is the inverse of the placebo. If you think the placebo will improve your health outcome, it will. If you think the intervention will have a negative effect on you (nocebo), it also will. This is a central theme of the book, and Langer spends most of her time here taking a deep dive into these unbelievable mechanisms. She tells the reader about some incredible studies that her lab has done in this emerging area of research. She drops this quote: "But my use of the word “mindfulness� also, importantly, refers to a condition of the body. Indeed, I believe our psychology may be the most important determinant of our health. I’m not just speaking of harmony between mind and body. I believe the mind and body comprise a single system, and every change in the human being is essentially simultaneously a change at the level of the mind (that is, a cognitive change) as well as the body (a hormonal, neural, and/or behavioral change). When we open our minds to this idea of mind-body unity, new possibilities for controlling our health become real. Making use of the power of a mindful body is well within our grasp." And this one (one of my all-time faves), speaking to how the scientific community has received this research at large: "Schopenhauer is presumed to have said, “All research passes through three phases: First it is ridiculed; then it is violently opposed; and third it is accepted as self-evident.� The contents of the book are: (view spoiler)[ The Social Construction of Rules Almost Counts: The Hidden Costs of the Borderline Effect The Myth of Risk-Taking Actor or Observer? Risk and Prediction The Arbitrariness of Interpreting Risk The Illusion of Control What Can We Control? Mindful Optimism Is “Normal Distribution� Normal? Just Try Harder Sorting Winners and Losers Someone Else’s Shoes: The Problem with Perspective Taking Decision Systems Infinite Regress Making the Decision Right No Wrong Decision When Decisions Matter The Unreliability of Probability Why Regrets? No Right Decisions Guesses, Predictions, Choices, and Decisions Trying or Doing? Blame and Forgiveness Finding Meaning Mind-Body Dualism A More Complete Mind-Body Unity Testing Mind-Body Unity Powers of Perception Embodied Cognition The Mind and the Senses Imagined Eating Imaginary Exercise Interesting Possibilities Placebo Power Strong Medicine Who Do You Believe? Spontaneous Remissions Embodying the Mind Attention to Variability, Uncertainty, and Mindfulness Symptom Variability Healing Is a Matter of Opportunity Catching Mindfulness Sensitivity to Mindfulness Mindful Contagion and Health Our Senses Something in the Air A New Approach to Health Mindful Medicine Mental Health Mindful Hospitals Unimpossible (hide spoiler)] The Mindful Body was a another excellent work from the author. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars, and a spot on my "favorites" shelf. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 09, 2024
|
Oct 15, 2024
|
Oct 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1119750830
| 9781119750833
| 1119750830
| 4.07
| 73
| unknown
| Apr 12, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
"For far too long, mindfulness in the West has been nearly exclusively associated with spirituality and/or wellness..." Mindfulness Without the Bells a "For far too long, mindfulness in the West has been nearly exclusively associated with spirituality and/or wellness..." Mindfulness Without the Bells and Beads was a great book on the topic. I love reading about mindset, performance, mindfulness, and other related topics across the health and wellness sphere, so I put this one on my list when I came across it. Author is a US Army veteran, former diplomat and business executive, and career intelligence officer who currently serves as Chief, Enterprise Learning Solutions, Academy for Defense Intelligence, within the Defense Intelligence Agency. Clif Smith: Smith writes with an effective style, that I found both informative and engaging. I am super picky about how readable my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. It won't have trouble holding the finicky reader's attention. The audiobook version I have was also read by the author, which was a nice touch. He's a great speaker and did a very good job of the narration. He gets the writing here off on a good foot with a well-written intro. He drops an interesting analogy about the staggered starting lanes on an elliptical running track. Smith drops the quote at the start of this review, and it continues: "...People seeking enlightenment or relief from stress, anxiety, and pain have been the primary audience. He also drops this quote early on: "I don't know why you picked up this book, but given the title it might be that you've had the thought, “What the hell is all the hype about mindfulness?� You may be one of the millions of people who have been curious about mindfulness but don't want to be associated with the spiritual crowd that so often drowns out its core meaning. Perhaps you recoil at the thought of listening to someone breathlessly guide meditations in a sickly sweet voice. Maybe you thought you'd need to join a yoga studio and get a subscription for monthly deliveries of incense. If any of those have been keeping you from trying out mindfulness, this book is for you. In these pages, I peel back the layers of hype and hyperbole about mindfulness and provide a practical and demystified approach to reaping the real benefits from a consistent mindfulness practice over just an 8-week period. Although it sounds simple and obvious on its face, the state of being "mindful" is pretty much the polar opposite mindset of the average modern, Western citizen - who goes through much of their waking life with the lights on, but no one home... People develop routines, and then go through the minutia of their day on a form of autopilot. So just what is "mindfulness"? "Mindfulness is an ability to keep attention on one's present moment experience without getting too caught up in automatic thoughts and judgments." The book's subtitle is expanded upon in this bit of writing: "Attending my first mindfulness teacher training course was quite a shock. In the morning on the first day, the teachers came into the room holding small bells, wearing Buddhist beads, and carrying special cushions on which they meditated. This struck me as odd, because I had signed up for the “secular� mindfulness teacher training. It did not take long to gather that this “secular� training was going to be deeply intertwined with overtly spiritual and new-age thoughts, positions, and perspectives. There were–I kid you not–even Tarot card readings at an evening event and scores of participant comments during the training were met with the response, “That's so beautiful.� If you want to turn off a corporate audience and never be invited back beyond what your original contract stipulated, just do what's in this paragraph." I have been actively reading about mindfulness for a few years now, and already incorporate daily mindfulness practices into my life. I've found the quality of my thoughts, and my daily life have become more enriched as a result. In Jay Shetty's book: Think Like a Monk, he says in the Ashram, the Master told them to notice 3 new things every time on their routine daily walk through the garden. I do this myself as well when I walk or jog around my neighbourhood. The benefits of mindfulness training are numerous, and Smith drops this quote: "As you progress through the book and do the exercises, you can gain a greater ability to respond thoughtfully and calmly in the midst of high-pressure and complex situations, become more agile in the face of change, and pay more attention to the things you deem most important. You will learn practices that are known to lead to enhanced mental focus, empathy, and resilience. Through consistent practice, you can become aware of some of your self-created challenges and learn ways to avoid automatically falling into the same patterns so you can get out of your own way. You will learn ways to be less affected by unhelpful internal dialogue, limiting beliefs, and irrational feelings of fear (failure, embarrassment, and criticism), allowing you to see and seize opportunities to grow beyond what you previously thought possible and unlock your latent potential. Finally, you'll also begin to be able to connect with people around you more fully and effectively. These benefits cascade and compound, resulting in improvements in performance, leadership, and well-being." Some more of what the author talks about here includes: � People's inborn negativity bias � Mindfulness Changes the Brain � Focused Attention Meditation � Open Awareness Meditation � Diving Deeper: An 8-Week Journey to Exceptional Performance, Leadership, and Well-Being � Body Scan Meditation � Mindfulness of Sounds, Thoughts, and Emotions � Empathy � Compassion � Kindness � A Mindful Day Mindfulness Without the Bells and Beads was a well done dive into the topic. I would recommend it to anyone interested in becoming more Mindful. 4.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Oct 02, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
![]() |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.13
|
did not like it
|
Apr 15, 2025
|
Apr 10, 2025
|
||||||
4.01
|
liked it
|
Apr 07, 2025
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
||||||
4.07
|
liked it
|
Apr 02, 2025
|
Mar 26, 2025
|
||||||
4.01
|
it was ok
|
Mar 27, 2025
|
Mar 24, 2025
|
||||||
3.86
|
liked it
|
Mar 25, 2025
|
Mar 20, 2025
|
||||||
4.00
|
really liked it
|
Mar 08, 2025
|
Mar 05, 2025
|
||||||
3.83
|
liked it
|
Jan 2025
|
Dec 30, 2024
|
||||||
3.65
|
liked it
|
Dec 27, 2024
|
Dec 17, 2024
|
||||||
4.12
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 19, 2024
|
Dec 12, 2024
|
||||||
3.83
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 15, 2024
|
Dec 10, 2024
|
||||||
4.17
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 2025
|
Dec 02, 2024
|
||||||
2.50
|
did not like it
|
Nov 14, 2024
|
Nov 13, 2024
|
||||||
3.66
|
it was ok
|
Nov 06, 2024
|
Nov 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.88
|
really liked it
|
Nov 2024
|
Oct 30, 2024
|
||||||
3.79
|
it was ok
|
Nov 13, 2024
|
Oct 24, 2024
|
||||||
3.73
|
it was ok
|
Feb 26, 2025
|
Oct 22, 2024
|
||||||
3.71
|
it was ok
|
Oct 17, 2024
|
Oct 16, 2024
|
||||||
3.26
|
really liked it
|
Oct 08, 2024
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
||||||
3.80
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 15, 2024
|
Oct 04, 2024
|
||||||
4.07
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 07, 2024
|
Oct 02, 2024
|