Ian's Reviews > Eon
Eon (The Way, #1)
by
by

Ian's review
bookshelves: love-hate-relationship, question-reality, unfulfilled-expectations, nostalgia
Feb 26, 2011
bookshelves: love-hate-relationship, question-reality, unfulfilled-expectations, nostalgia
Read 3 times. Last read February 23, 2011 to March 9, 2011.
I loved this book as a teenager/young adult in the 80's. It was the awesomest thing I'd read to that point, and it remained awesome in my memory. I own a true first edition hardcover in fine condition—actually pretty rare, especially in such good shape—and it will remain one of the prized pieces of my book collection for a long time. Eon also will remain one of the seminal sci-fi works of the late-20th Century. In retrospect its influence on later works is clear, its position as a pioneering work solid. It helps that Greg Bear is a physicist and mathematician, and his knowledge impelled him to make use of modern theoretical physics in ways that previous sci-fi authors couldn’t but which every subsequent author would attempt to emulate and tune to their own songs. The world building—and here I must qualify, I mean in the Thistledown asteroid—is fabulous. For those of you who haven't read Eon, the asteroid appears in our solar system from another universe, one closely paralleling our own, and enters orbit around Earth. We send people to investigate and discover seven hollowed-out chambers full of cities, forests, mountains, deserts, and machinery. The great wonder—which you quickly discover so I'm not really spoiling anything—is that the seventh chamber goes on forever. Re-reading this book I felt like I was entering through the bore-hole for the first time and experiencing the asteroid anew. I was there, in the Thistledown, one of the team, ready to explore and learn and add to scientific knowledge and grow closer to myself and my teammates. Then, when the war came, I felt the anguish and grief of The Death; I thought deeply about the horrors of nuclear weapons and the devastation they will someday bring.
And yes, if you're wondering, I do believe that nuclear weapons, so long as we allow them to exist, pose a very real threat to the survival of our civilization. No weapon is ever designed not to be used. If nuclear weapons are never again used, it's because they've either been destroyed or superseded by something more horrible.
Coming back down from my soapbox � Greg Bear's writing was very satisfying for me when I was younger. He conveys information effectively, dreams up creative storylines, and knows how to keep a plot moving. Now, having expanding my reading tastes—and ability—to a much broader spectrum of styles and authors, I find Bear's style a bit grating. Not too grating to read, but enough to make me chafe, like rubbing your palm on very fine sandpaper. Still, reading it again now, I thoroughly enjoyed Eon through the first 250-or-so pages. The plot was interesting and moved quickly. The characters were a little too obvious, a little to "best-seller" shallow for my taste, but they fit their environment and had plausible motivations and actions.
Then, somewhere between page 250 and 300, things settled down. The story plateaued. Many mysteries were solved, most plot points wrapped up. The mysteries and plot points that remained unresolved were, to me, not so interesting anymore. The world-building became estranged, even contrived, though that may be a bit too harsh. It became more about the characters than the plot. Now, let's make sure we're on the same page, here. I love character studies. I'm okay with a slow-moving plot full of interesting characters. But, as I noted above, the characters in Eon aren't that interesting. They make sense, but there's no real mystery to them, not enough depth to explore, and so became predictable. Slow plot + predictable characters = Bo.Ring.
However, even given the flaws and failings, I'm still glad I re-read Eon. It showed me how far my reading taste has evolved over the last 20 years. It helped me appreciate Eon in a way I couldn't as a young man, for the original work that it was. Re-reading Eon also was a nostalgic experience, helping me connect with my younger self, the self that developed a passion for sci-fi largely because of Eon and others of Greg Bear's novels. So, its flaws notwithstanding, Eon will retain is "awesomest" status in my memories.
And yes, if you're wondering, I do believe that nuclear weapons, so long as we allow them to exist, pose a very real threat to the survival of our civilization. No weapon is ever designed not to be used. If nuclear weapons are never again used, it's because they've either been destroyed or superseded by something more horrible.
Coming back down from my soapbox � Greg Bear's writing was very satisfying for me when I was younger. He conveys information effectively, dreams up creative storylines, and knows how to keep a plot moving. Now, having expanding my reading tastes—and ability—to a much broader spectrum of styles and authors, I find Bear's style a bit grating. Not too grating to read, but enough to make me chafe, like rubbing your palm on very fine sandpaper. Still, reading it again now, I thoroughly enjoyed Eon through the first 250-or-so pages. The plot was interesting and moved quickly. The characters were a little too obvious, a little to "best-seller" shallow for my taste, but they fit their environment and had plausible motivations and actions.
Then, somewhere between page 250 and 300, things settled down. The story plateaued. Many mysteries were solved, most plot points wrapped up. The mysteries and plot points that remained unresolved were, to me, not so interesting anymore. The world-building became estranged, even contrived, though that may be a bit too harsh. It became more about the characters than the plot. Now, let's make sure we're on the same page, here. I love character studies. I'm okay with a slow-moving plot full of interesting characters. But, as I noted above, the characters in Eon aren't that interesting. They make sense, but there's no real mystery to them, not enough depth to explore, and so became predictable. Slow plot + predictable characters = Bo.Ring.
However, even given the flaws and failings, I'm still glad I re-read Eon. It showed me how far my reading taste has evolved over the last 20 years. It helped me appreciate Eon in a way I couldn't as a young man, for the original work that it was. Re-reading Eon also was a nostalgic experience, helping me connect with my younger self, the self that developed a passion for sci-fi largely because of Eon and others of Greg Bear's novels. So, its flaws notwithstanding, Eon will retain is "awesomest" status in my memories.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Eon.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
Started Reading
(Hardcover Edition)
January 1, 1992
–
Finished Reading
(Hardcover Edition)
June 27, 2009
– Shelved
(Hardcover Edition)
August 18, 2009
– Shelved as:
my-collection
(Hardcover Edition)
September 3, 2009
– Shelved as:
blew-my-mind
(Hardcover Edition)
September 3, 2009
– Shelved as:
fits-like-a-glove
(Hardcover Edition)
September 21, 2009
– Shelved as:
must-read-again
(Hardcover Edition)
February 23, 2011
–
Started Reading
February 26, 2011
– Shelved
February 28, 2011
–
22.85%
"Reading this book again, I realize how far ahead of his fellow sf writers Greg Bear was in using modern theoretical physics to create interesting settings for his stories. I didn't appreciate any of it when I read this book in high school. But reading now, as an adult and 25 years after it was first published, Greg Bear looks like a pioneer."
page
117
March 8, 2011
–
68.36%
"First 250 pages it was hard to put down, despite the writing being a little grating. Now the plot has slowed and I'm bored."
page
350
March 9, 2011
– Shelved as:
love-hate-relationship
March 9, 2011
– Shelved as:
question-reality
March 9, 2011
– Shelved as:
unfulfilled-expectations
March 9, 2011
– Shelved as:
nostalgia
March 9, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
mark
(new)
Jul 12, 2011 09:56PM

reply
|
flag