Boustrophedon's Reviews > Night Sky with Exit Wounds
Night Sky with Exit Wounds
by
by

This is the first full-length collection by Ocean Vuong, a rather thoughtless writer who is careless with words and who has never crossed a pathos he didn't immediately take. Voung has a second-rate imagination that never goes beyond his favorite subject, which is Vuong (see his New Yorker poem, "Someday I'll Love Ocean Vuong," which is literally addressed to himself, as an example). Page after page exhibits poor writing: in "Prayer for the Newly Damned" he writes "what becomes of the shepherds/ when the sheep are cannibals?" Nothing happens to the shepherds when the sheep are cannibals; the word he meant to use but did not is "carnivorous" or "carnivores." Patterns emerge. Vuong chooses words with as much accuracy as a blindfolded child pinning a tail on a donkey. Take a recent poem of his not in this collection, "Tell Me Something Good," which goes "his bald head ringed with red hair, like a planet on fire." If the planet were on fire, which is impossible of course, but no matter the inane metaphor, the planet would be engulfed in fire, not ringed, which suggests a different, non-engulfing image. Or this trite simile from "Aubade with Burning City": "On the nightstand, a sprig of magnolia expands like a secret heard for the first time." Every line of every poem sounds like it means something, until one actually dissects it and realizes there is nothing underneath the thick sentimentality. (One might also note that reviews rarely engage with the poems on a line-by-line basis, which would reveal their shallowness.) And every line is so overwrought as to be insincere: "For hunger is to give / the body what it knows / it cannot keep." Vuong is almost thirty; that previous example is not what I consider to be worthy of a so-called emerging poet.
Though Vuong is not emerging. This is his third book if we count his two chapbooks, which we should because they are not much slimmer than this collection. I don't think Vuong will ever get better. He has his market--which I imagine overlaps with buyers of Thomas Kinkade paintings or Precious Moments figurines--and he is easily marketable (and exotifiable: publications love to make note of his unusual name and his concocted backstory, which often becomes the focus instead of the poems).
Anyway, recommended if you like poems that seem like they just peed themselves in the corner of the room.
Though Vuong is not emerging. This is his third book if we count his two chapbooks, which we should because they are not much slimmer than this collection. I don't think Vuong will ever get better. He has his market--which I imagine overlaps with buyers of Thomas Kinkade paintings or Precious Moments figurines--and he is easily marketable (and exotifiable: publications love to make note of his unusual name and his concocted backstory, which often becomes the focus instead of the poems).
Anyway, recommended if you like poems that seem like they just peed themselves in the corner of the room.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Night Sky with Exit Wounds.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
April 17, 2016
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kilian
(new)
Jul 13, 2016 05:50PM

reply
|
flag

"What becomes of the shepherds/when the sheep are cannibals?"
Well answer me this: What is a shepherd without any sheep?
Cannibalism implies the sheep are eating themselves, which then implies that they are carnivores in this weird setting.
Just because it isn't your cup of tea doesn't mean it's nonsensical bull and you don't have to snatch someone so rough. Yikes.




The funny thing is that he made a mistake of the sort you poke fun at. He was explaining the difference between writing lyric poetry vs. a novel. He said that when writing lyric poetry he starts with a "pinnacle" which expands to encompass everything. Whereas with novels he had to start by describing a larger pattern.
At the time he said "pinnacle" I expected him to say "pinpoint." And I spent the next few moments wondering if he had meant to say pinnacle. In the end, I was okay with him saying "pinnacle." Perhaps he meant to say it? It had the same meaning assaying "pinpoint" but with a slight twist that made me pause to reflect on his meaning.


