Scott's Reviews > The Virtues of War
The Virtues of War
by
by

Written in first person, this novel tells the story of Alexander's conquests through his own words. This book was a major turn-off in the beginning because it was nothing more than a statistical summary of all the components of his army during one campaign versus another. He would list in detail the types of weapons his men carried, how much these weapons weighed, how they were utilized and why they were so effective in certain situations. Also a lot of detail on battlefield strategy, which interested me not in the least. What I was looking for was a story about Alexander and how he came to power, not a checklist of his supplies. But in the end, I realized that my expectations were probably set too high. When you consider that Alexander spent his entire adult life making war, it's probably a pretty accurate depiction of who he really was. What else could be said about a guy who was always thinking ahead to his next battle? So perhaps the novel's weaknesses shouldn't be blamed on Pressfield but instead on Alexander, who maybe just wasn't as interesting as I would've thought. I would like to add, however, that there were parts to the story that I liked very much, especially toward the end when Alexander begins to express a faint sense of regret. If this had been a bigger part of the plot, I would have given it a much better recommendation.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Virtues of War.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
April 30, 2008
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Dana
(new)
May 30, 2008 05:58AM

reply
|
flag

So, your review basically hits that right on the head. You're right, you can't really fault Pressfield, but it's understandable how things like that could grate on a less interested reader.