Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Scott's Reviews > The Virtues of War

The Virtues of War by Steven Pressfield
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
M 50x66
's review

liked it

Written in first person, this novel tells the story of Alexander's conquests through his own words. This book was a major turn-off in the beginning because it was nothing more than a statistical summary of all the components of his army during one campaign versus another. He would list in detail the types of weapons his men carried, how much these weapons weighed, how they were utilized and why they were so effective in certain situations. Also a lot of detail on battlefield strategy, which interested me not in the least. What I was looking for was a story about Alexander and how he came to power, not a checklist of his supplies. But in the end, I realized that my expectations were probably set too high. When you consider that Alexander spent his entire adult life making war, it's probably a pretty accurate depiction of who he really was. What else could be said about a guy who was always thinking ahead to his next battle? So perhaps the novel's weaknesses shouldn't be blamed on Pressfield but instead on Alexander, who maybe just wasn't as interesting as I would've thought. I would like to add, however, that there were parts to the story that I liked very much, especially toward the end when Alexander begins to express a faint sense of regret. If this had been a bigger part of the plot, I would have given it a much better recommendation.
5 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Virtues of War.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
April 30, 2008 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dana (new)

Dana I absolutely love your review and not just because I love you so very much, but because it is a wonderful summary of the work. ;)


A.J. Since I just finished the book tonight I struggled with how to deal with that exact part of the storytelling. On the one hand, unless you're someone like me who is utterly fascinated by battlefield tactics, maneuvers, and the like, you're probably going to be nodding off. On the other hand, it's a pretty dang important fact that one of the main reasons the Persian empire fell is because Alexander's armies had spears four feet longer than the other guy's. Not to mention, he's Alexander, and all Alexander does all day long is either make war, or plan to make war.

So, your review basically hits that right on the head. You're right, you can't really fault Pressfield, but it's understandable how things like that could grate on a less interested reader.


back to top