Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Mehrsa's Reviews > The Mismeasure of Man

The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Jay Gould
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1045774
's review

it was amazing

Gould is a good person and an excellent thinker. This is a call to scientists to examine their own biases and it is a demolishment of centuries of racist genetic testing. It's also such a pleasure to read someone who is a sound thinker and can write logically. I know some of his debunkings (i.e. Morton) have since been debunked, but that does nothing to diminish the importance of this work.

Also, he notes that racist "science" tends to proceed from movements demanding equality. And so it is that the likes of Murray joined by a bunch of other people are once again advancing the guard of IQ determinism. I could really use an updated Mismeasurement of Man right about now
27 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Mismeasure of Man.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 26, 2018 – Shelved
September 26, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Sam (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sam toer Through his studies, Stephen Jay Gould made major contributions to the development of human thought and to our understanding of the world we live in. His works were always permeated with a progressive outlook. He totally rejected reactionary scientific theories and refuted all attempts to use pseudo-scientific theories to justify racism and discrimination. In his excellent book The Mismeasure of Man the acclaimed paleontologist explains that how centuries of science were tainted by the toxin of racism, in addition to sheer idiocy, if not outright chicanery. He demonstrates convincingly how prejudices of race and/or class deeply biased, tainted and colored conclusions. Pseudo-Scientists advanced theories of skull size (craniology), of bumps on the head (phrenology), all fully measured, but also, all fully false and manufactured. He states "What craniology was for the nineteenth century, intelligence testing has become for the twentieth, when it assumes that intelligence is a single, innate, heritable, and measurable thing."
Scientists can be objective when, for example, they measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon, but as they approach social questions like racism, gay rights or abortion, ingrained biases emanating from the dominant social mores can sometimes overwhelm the best objective intentions.


Lori Please let me know if you find an updated Mismeasurement of Man.


back to top