欧宝娱乐

meg Olson's Reviews > Quicksilver

Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
25195
's review

did not like it

The first third of the book was generally plodding and lacking in any interesting protagonists (and no, I don't care that the oh-so-clever-writer added in as many famous characters as he could think of, they were still generally annoying). The second third showed much more promise, and was actually really fun, until the very end when everything got awful. Not like The-Empire-Strikes-Back-second-act-as-many-bad-things-happen-as-possible awful, though I think that's what the author was aiming for. Just unneccesary and silly and revolting. Based on that, a quick thumbing of the final third, and the pervasively self-conscious and occasionally completely-annoying prose, I'm done with this one. It had high points. The descriptions of some of the experiments in the first section. The soon-to-be insane Vagabond King. There was even an infrequent well-written paragraph. It appears there is actually quite a lot of story material for a really good book here, but this redition of the plot has abused my trust for far too long.

One last thing. The only "real" female character in the novel is badly written. I mean, it's not like his male characters beyond Jack are well-thought out and consistently imagined. But Eliza is a particularly poorly developed character- confusing and often contradictery, with shifting morals and no real reason behind many of her actions. I don't know if this is one of those "well aren't women just like that, guffaw" things or simply another literary over-extension on the author's part. I do know it was aggrivating, though.
18 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Quicksilver.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

July 16, 2007 – Shelved
Started Reading
August 13, 2007 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Hirondelle (not getting notifications) Hope you do not mind the comment, I see the points of your critique but disagree regarding one point, while Eliza is not a really believable character, Jack ( who I love) is just as much a picaresque novel character (that is, not really totally credible) as Eliza - it is just we get his point of view so everything is more justified then. It was Daniel, poor boring Puritan Daniel who seemed the one really developed character in the lot. Jack with all his tall tales, well not so much - though we do know Jack is unreliable about everything, and on the borderline of insanity.


message 2: by Pat (new) - rated it 1 star

Pat I so agree about the female character being badly written. It comes off as if the author really doesn't understand women or has little sympathy for them. If I weren't trying to read this on my Kindle it would have been hurled across the room and against the wall long ago.


back to top