Elliot johnson's Reviews > Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love
Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love
by
by

What a huge letdown! Totally overrated. This subject truly fascinates me, but the author merely builds on the research of others and pads it with quotes from popular literature, poetry and song lyrics, as though that proves a point. If you take out all those quotes it's probably half as thick. It's like she just googled "Love" and included every quote she could find. Reads like a so-so undergrad paper. The only thing the author herself actually brings to the table is the notion that certain neurotransmitters may play a role the body's chemistry during times of heightened emotion, and that's still based on the research of others and is in no way a new theory. Also unsettling is her complete failure to acknowledge the late Dorothy Tennov who practically invented the investigative study of romantic love. She clearly references Tennov's work yet does not go so far as to name her. But this Helen Fisher is the talking head we get whenever the media wants an expert on the subject. Read Stendhal's "Love" and Tennov's "Love and Limerence"... Helen Fisher is a snake.
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
Why We Love.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
October 8, 2008
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Alexi
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Nov 14, 2014 07:15AM

reply
|
flag