Leslie's Reviews > The Tales of Beedle the Bard
The Tales of Beedle the Bard
by
by

I felt very warm and fuzzy reading new JKR. How can I not love an alleged children's writer who mentions murder, mutilation, cannibalism, adultery, and bestiality all within the span of 110 (ultra-short) pages? The stories are on the meh side, but Dumbledore's commentaries showed a smart, literary eye that reminded me briefly of Pale Fire. I'm all, "Hey, JK, you did your thang." Be that as it may, I'm a bit offended by the Dumbledore's anti-anti-Muggle bias. I see nothing wrong with witches and wizards not wanting to associate with Muggles. I hate Muggles, they are the worst! And I have Muggle heritage myself (but don't tell anyone I said that, EEW EEW EEW!) so you know I can't be magicist. Sometimes I look in the mirror and I think, "Go back to where you came from, Mudblood!" So I did -- but the staff at New York Presbyterian wouldn't take me back.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The Tales of Beedle the Bard.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Charity
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Dec 24, 2012 06:00AM

reply
|
flag



Very true, actually.
...mudbloods are still the worst. Ew, me. Ew, other muggles.

Also dont be hard on Dumbledore because he's just overcompensating for when he was young dumb prejudiced and in love Grindelwald which jkr conveniently didnt mention in the books i might add
