Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Consciousness delineates unconsciousness. Understanding delineates misunderstanding. One must find oneself in Lacan's discourse, according to what one does and does not understand. I'm not sure how else to describe this book, or how it should be approached - at least in layman's terms. It's dense, it's difficult, and I wonder how much of it can be taken literally. To take Lacan 'literally' one must take the literal for granted - which is, I think, to miss the point entirely. The literal qua real is impossible; it is always deferred. Bearing this is in mind -literally or otherwise - Ecrits is quite an enjoyable, at times god-awfully infuriating read.