Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Cheri Kannarr's Reviews > Yours for the Taking

Yours for the Taking by Gabrielle  Korn
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
13391316
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: climate-change, dystopian, lgbtq, sci-fi

Thanks to St. Martin's Press for the ARC.

I hate to give such a poor review to an ARC, but this book just isn't ready to be published. I wanted to like it - sapphic cli-fi sounds very appealing to me. But the science was terrible, the characters poorly developed, the plot meandering & frankly unbelievable. The idea for a great story is here with more character development & a good science editor.

Science errors, especially medical, are a huge pet peeve of mine in fiction. Embryo transfer & intrauterine insemination are a big focus here without a basic understanding of how these work. What are "female eggs"? All eggs are female! How about embryo transfer without any embryo harvest or uterine prep? And a near 100% success rate! Then there's the space shuttles. In the near future, people are living on space shuttles (not habitats or stations) that are large enough for individual housing & recreational spaces. With artificial gravity. Where did this technology come from? Really, these & other science errors should have been caught by basic editing.

The main characters (the book follows 3) are all young women - 2 cis, 1 trans, all lesbian. All seem poorly developed to me. Basic character background in some cases isn't introduced until the latter part of the book. None seem to mature over the course of the book, although over 20 years pass. They're all a bit too naive to be believable.

Jacqueline's whole empire also is poorly fleshed out. What exactly are the Yours! spaces? She's hiring young women, new graduates, and students to fill positions of power & leadership, but none seem prepared for these roles. Doesn't she already have a corporate empire? Where are her personal assistants & staff? How did she manage to rig the Inside space's population acceptance without any oversight or notice? No one challenges what she's doing for over 20 years?

So many ideas in this book could have been expanded to create a great story but overall there was too much going on & too little fleshed out for this book to work.
36 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Yours for the Taking.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 1, 2023 – Shelved
April 1, 2023 – Shelved as: to-read
June 25, 2023 – Started Reading
June 25, 2023 – Shelved as: sci-fi
June 25, 2023 – Shelved as: lgbtq
June 25, 2023 – Shelved as: dystopian
June 25, 2023 – Shelved as: climate-change
June 25, 2023 –
page 68
20.24%
June 27, 2023 –
page 125
37.2% "Medical details or lack of accuracy are driving me nuts. Insemination/ embryo transfer without any preparation. No sterilization before entering closed environment (bed bugs???). Doctor (medical director!) performing basic grooming tasks. Jacqueline giving so much trust & power to staff she barely knows & with no experience. What is Yours?

Story needs to be more fleshed out"
June 27, 2023 –
page 206
61.31% "". . . fertilize only female eggs. . ."

Referring to the girls as twins"
June 27, 2023 –
page 219
65.18%
June 29, 2023 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

lyraand I laughed at "female eggs" but figured it was meant to highlight how ignorant/incompetent Jaqueline is. Olympia later says Jaqueline "wanted us to interfere with the IVF and only implant people with female embryos," so I think the author probably knows the difference. Maybe Olympia should have more explicitly stated how scientifically nonsensical Jaqueline's instructions were.


back to top