ŷ

Jack Edwards's Reviews > Julia

Julia by Sandra Newman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
91520258
's review

it was ok

Throw me in Room 101 and you'll find me locked in there with only this book to read.............

Normally I love a (feminist) literary retelling but -- though it was fun to dive back into Orwell's 1984 and reimagine events from Julia's perspective -- this book only made me appreciate how much better Orwell's original was. Of course the comparison is inevitable, and tackling a modern classic is a respectfully ballsy risk, but this only proves that Orwell's 1984 truly is a timeless, untouchable masterpiece.

'Julia', on the other hand, kind of reads like one of those books published in the post-Hunger Games teen-dystopia craze around 2014 with nothing especially exciting to say. Winston Smith is belittled to such a one-dimensional weenie that I found it borderline cringeworthy, and the ideological discussion is basic, if not nonexistent. I'm sad because I expected this to be a new favourite, but at least it made me want to read 1984 again to wash myself clean of this.
1349 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Julia.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 24, 2024 – Started Reading
December 24, 2024 – Shelved
December 24, 2024 –
10.0% "Oh no it’s not as good I thought it was going to be"
December 25, 2024 –
23.0%
December 27, 2024 –
48.0%
December 31, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by robs (new) - added it

robs I AGREE SM


message 2: by Robert (new)

Robert Turner I read 1984 for the first time a few months ago and thoroughly enjoyed it! Saw no use of a retelling from Julia, unlike the marvelous James in the retelling of Huckaberry Finn.


message 3: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie Tucker Okay good because I actually didn't like Julia lol


message 4: by becca (new)

becca Not the room 101


Julia Agree! I did not like this at all but I really was hoping to :(


message 6: by Paula (new)

Paula *deletes from cart*


message 7: by B. (new) - added it

B. Please share your favorite feminist retellings!


message 8: by Clueless (new) - added it

Clueless I would be shaking as an author if Jack gave me a two stars review 😮‍� anyway adding this to see how bad is it


message 9: by Keegan (new)

Keegan Keelan "Belittled to such a one-dimensional weenie"
Brilliant


message 10: by Kei (new) - added it

Kei Furuya I DNF'd this. Horrible


message 11: by Roy (new)

Roy Ok, took it off my tbr list


message 12: by Vaibhav Rajput (new)

Vaibhav Rajput thanks for saving me time and money


message 13: by Sandy AE (new)

Sandy AE Have you read 1984 recently? Winston IS a one dimensional weenie. I didn’t like how sexist 1984 was, so I might have been interested in this. However, I trust your judgement, despite not seeing how horrible 1984 actually was.


Karen For me, 1984 was a challenging read due to its sexism. The story was thrilling, great even. But irritating at the same time.

So experiencing a similar story through the perspective of a woman felt refreshing and meaningful. I agree that the writing style and storytelling diverge significantly from the original and wouldn’t qualify as a modern classic at all.

Still, as a woman, this feels like a small act of vindication - reclaiming narratives where women were forgotten or sidelined. Far too often, women are rendered invisible in literature, or worse, reduced to mere ornaments or objects of desire. It’s exhausting to read these celebrated classics and feel, at the same time, dismissed or insulted.

The omission or objectification of women in stories diminishes not only the works themselves but also the perceived brilliance of their authors. See how Dracula by Bram Stoker, 1984 by George Orwell, and countless others fall into this pattern. While these stories are often celebrated for their genius, their treatment of women reveals a troubling disregard for half of humanity.

Long story short: the original was great in writing, terrible in it's sexism. This retelling is not great in writing, but a pleasure to read regardless. Winston Smith IS a little weenie in the story sometimes in both.


message 15: by Lena (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lena But you had no problem with Julia being a one-dimensional character in the original book? With no agenda and no brains, not even a surname? Please, Orwell is much more cruel with Julia than Newman is with Smith


Pawel Kowalczyk No. Orwell's "1984", although one the most important books of the 20th century was a black and white vision of a society like from fully automated factory. Sandra Newman put LIFE into this story. They should be printed together


Rebecca Josefine I'm currently reading this and I agree with Karen on her thoughts. I feel like Winston is given the classic treatment and this is a great addition to the discussion of how women in classic stories are portrayed


message 18: by Dana (new)

Dana I loved 1984, so I was ecstatic to know this existed. You better know I was going to dive straight into it. Glad you saved me the trouble though. lol


Erin Beall Strong disagree! Julia brings this world to life� because women are life. 1984 was nearly soulless; Julia gives the world a complex, painful, feminine soul.


Non-native Virginian Folks, pick up the book and read it for yourself, it's pretty amazing. This person's review is as shallow as the mind from which it originates.


message 21: by M (new) - rated it 4 stars

M I really disagree with you on this one.. for me it’s insightful and essential and an ideal companion to the original!


message 22: by Klea (new) - added it

Klea - Sherlocked Bookworm "One dimensional weenie" you mean the way Julia was in the OG 1984


message 23: by Elaine (new)

Elaine - at the risk of being labeled as “that kind of feminist,� I still gotta say. Of course a man wrote this comment


back to top