Jack Edwards's Reviews > Julia
Julia
by
by

Throw me in Room 101 and you'll find me locked in there with only this book to read.............
Normally I love a (feminist) literary retelling but -- though it was fun to dive back into Orwell's 1984 and reimagine events from Julia's perspective -- this book only made me appreciate how much better Orwell's original was. Of course the comparison is inevitable, and tackling a modern classic is a respectfully ballsy risk, but this only proves that Orwell's 1984 truly is a timeless, untouchable masterpiece.
'Julia', on the other hand, kind of reads like one of those books published in the post-Hunger Games teen-dystopia craze around 2014 with nothing especially exciting to say. Winston Smith is belittled to such a one-dimensional weenie that I found it borderline cringeworthy, and the ideological discussion is basic, if not nonexistent. I'm sad because I expected this to be a new favourite, but at least it made me want to read 1984 again to wash myself clean of this.
Normally I love a (feminist) literary retelling but -- though it was fun to dive back into Orwell's 1984 and reimagine events from Julia's perspective -- this book only made me appreciate how much better Orwell's original was. Of course the comparison is inevitable, and tackling a modern classic is a respectfully ballsy risk, but this only proves that Orwell's 1984 truly is a timeless, untouchable masterpiece.
'Julia', on the other hand, kind of reads like one of those books published in the post-Hunger Games teen-dystopia craze around 2014 with nothing especially exciting to say. Winston Smith is belittled to such a one-dimensional weenie that I found it borderline cringeworthy, and the ideological discussion is basic, if not nonexistent. I'm sad because I expected this to be a new favourite, but at least it made me want to read 1984 again to wash myself clean of this.
1349 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Julia.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
robs
(new)
-
added it
Jan 03, 2025 01:10PM

reply
|
flag




So experiencing a similar story through the perspective of a woman felt refreshing and meaningful. I agree that the writing style and storytelling diverge significantly from the original and wouldn’t qualify as a modern classic at all.
Still, as a woman, this feels like a small act of vindication - reclaiming narratives where women were forgotten or sidelined. Far too often, women are rendered invisible in literature, or worse, reduced to mere ornaments or objects of desire. It’s exhausting to read these celebrated classics and feel, at the same time, dismissed or insulted.
The omission or objectification of women in stories diminishes not only the works themselves but also the perceived brilliance of their authors. See how Dracula by Bram Stoker, 1984 by George Orwell, and countless others fall into this pattern. While these stories are often celebrated for their genius, their treatment of women reveals a troubling disregard for half of humanity.
Long story short: the original was great in writing, terrible in it's sexism. This retelling is not great in writing, but a pleasure to read regardless. Winston Smith IS a little weenie in the story sometimes in both.






