ŷ

David's Reviews > We Do Not Part

We Do Not Part by Han Kang
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1385615
's review

it was ok

As will be obvious from the star rating, this did not work for me. The novel has had much greater success with most readers. I found it just okay.

I have nothing but praise for Kang's decision to grapple with the difficult and important subject matter: wartime violence, genocide, cultural destruction, generational trauma, open-ended family loss. Nor will I criticize a Nobel prize-winner's individual style. However, this application of a hazy, poetic narrative to harrowing themes was enervating rather than stimulating.

Truth be told, I was bored much of the time. And the author herself gives voice to my feelings toward the end of the book:

I don't want to open it... No one can force me to wade through those pages. I am under no obligation to comply. But my trembling hands reach out and open the book. I turn page after page.

Snow. Birds. Trees. Snow. Blood. Birds. Trees. Snow.

2.5 stars
30 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read We Do Not Part.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 15, 2025 – Started Reading
February 15, 2025 – Shelved
February 20, 2025 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by CanadianReader (new)

CanadianReader “this application of a hazy, poetic narrative to harrowing themes was enervating rather than stimulating.� Well said, and your conclusion—brilliant. I increasingly wonder if this poetic style ever really works. (Can you think of an example?) Whatever the case, I have less and less patience for it. It often seems pretentious and it can actually diminish the subject matter.

Having said that, I loved Cold Enough for Snow, but I’m not sure it’s poetic exactly—more lucid and calm. I loved the subject matter as well. An introspective book.


back to top