Bryan's Reviews > Quicksilver
Quicksilver (The Baroque Cycle, #1)
by
by

This book is just too vast to give justice to it in the few lines of this review that I might come up with now.
If you are ready to read this, here are some suggestions:
1) Start with Cryptonomicon first. You don't need to read this first, but it will help you get used to Stephenson's style, and you'll appreciate Quicksilver better having done so.
2) Before reading Quicksilver, spend some time brushing up on some basic English history. (Did you know that London burned? Do you know what the Monmouth Rebellion was, and the Bloody Assizes that followed? Do you know about the interregnum? Do you know that William III deposed James II in a coup?)
It would be nice if a timeline could be provided that summarizes the main points of English history that serve as context for this book - I admit I did not know enough myself of the history involved to get full appreciation of the book on my first reading... so now I'll have to read it again some time after doing some historical readings.
Perhaps read the wikipedia page on the diary of Samuel Pepys (if not the diary itself). Although he's really just a minor figure in this novel, his diary covers many of the same events that you'll encounter in Quicksilver.
3) Be prepared to deal with long digressions and elaborate descriptions. Instead of seeing them as tedious, look for the humor. Stephenson inevitably tries to put some humor into these, and although it's often very dry, it's quite amusing when you see how he's looking askance at the goings-on of the times and persons.
4) Beyond the history, take care to understand the geography.
5) Take some time to consider the cryptography used in the novel. When you understand just how a "letter within a letter" can be written, you'll appreciate more of Stephenson's particular genius.
6) Even though this is hardly a science-fiction novel, it does deal largely with scientists in the Royal Society. Be prepared, then, for descriptions of events seen through the eyes of a trained scientific observer. Something as simple as the motion of a boat's mast can be used scientifically to provide information about how the boat is loaded, as you'll find in the novel. Again, these portions of the book are trademarks of Stephenson's ingenuity, and I enjoyed them immensely.
7) Be patient. This is a long book, and not an easy read. If you can keep track of the main characters, you can actually put it away for a time, and return to it later to resume reading. I actually started this book some time ago, reading it only when I had uninterrupted opportunities to digest the novel. (I read other, lighter, works in the interim to keep me occupied and entertained).
In fact, after starting this book, I actually began work on a Master's degree, and completed the Master's degree faster than completing the book. That was perhaps a bit too slow, but also tells more about how busy I was instead of describing the nature of the book.
8) Revel in the richness of this book. It is indeed a masterpiece, and you can certainly gain more with each reread. This type of book is indeed rare, and its peculiar idiosyncrasies just make it more distinctive in its majesty, not lessening its achievement in any way.
If you are ready to read this, here are some suggestions:
1) Start with Cryptonomicon first. You don't need to read this first, but it will help you get used to Stephenson's style, and you'll appreciate Quicksilver better having done so.
2) Before reading Quicksilver, spend some time brushing up on some basic English history. (Did you know that London burned? Do you know what the Monmouth Rebellion was, and the Bloody Assizes that followed? Do you know about the interregnum? Do you know that William III deposed James II in a coup?)
It would be nice if a timeline could be provided that summarizes the main points of English history that serve as context for this book - I admit I did not know enough myself of the history involved to get full appreciation of the book on my first reading... so now I'll have to read it again some time after doing some historical readings.
Perhaps read the wikipedia page on the diary of Samuel Pepys (if not the diary itself). Although he's really just a minor figure in this novel, his diary covers many of the same events that you'll encounter in Quicksilver.
3) Be prepared to deal with long digressions and elaborate descriptions. Instead of seeing them as tedious, look for the humor. Stephenson inevitably tries to put some humor into these, and although it's often very dry, it's quite amusing when you see how he's looking askance at the goings-on of the times and persons.
4) Beyond the history, take care to understand the geography.
5) Take some time to consider the cryptography used in the novel. When you understand just how a "letter within a letter" can be written, you'll appreciate more of Stephenson's particular genius.
6) Even though this is hardly a science-fiction novel, it does deal largely with scientists in the Royal Society. Be prepared, then, for descriptions of events seen through the eyes of a trained scientific observer. Something as simple as the motion of a boat's mast can be used scientifically to provide information about how the boat is loaded, as you'll find in the novel. Again, these portions of the book are trademarks of Stephenson's ingenuity, and I enjoyed them immensely.
7) Be patient. This is a long book, and not an easy read. If you can keep track of the main characters, you can actually put it away for a time, and return to it later to resume reading. I actually started this book some time ago, reading it only when I had uninterrupted opportunities to digest the novel. (I read other, lighter, works in the interim to keep me occupied and entertained).
In fact, after starting this book, I actually began work on a Master's degree, and completed the Master's degree faster than completing the book. That was perhaps a bit too slow, but also tells more about how busy I was instead of describing the nature of the book.
8) Revel in the richness of this book. It is indeed a masterpiece, and you can certainly gain more with each reread. This type of book is indeed rare, and its peculiar idiosyncrasies just make it more distinctive in its majesty, not lessening its achievement in any way.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Quicksilver.
Sign In »
Quotes Bryan Liked

“Whenever serious and competent people need to get things done in the real world, all considerations of tradition and protocol fly out the window.”
― Quicksilver
― Quicksilver
Reading Progress
November 3, 2009
– Shelved
Started Reading
November 13, 2009
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Chris
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 22, 2012 11:57PM

reply
|
flag


This is meant to be a lighthearted comment, though - I am not contending you are wrong, Keith (in particular because you did not even address your comment to me...). It's just that, if you have to read more than 1/3rds into a a 3000-page oeuvre before it gets good, in my view the expository phase is a bit too long.


Yes, I could not agree more with you on this - the history of science is fascinating, especially in England at the time of the Restoration. But if I want to know about this (and I do), I will turn to scholarly monographs examining these developments (and I did), rather than to a disjointed narrative that looks at the time through a kaleidoscope (if we can agree that is what Neal does).
Neal's book is clearly not a scholarly treatise on 17th Century history of ideas. But so what is the point? I am not being sarcastic - I genuinely do not understand why this book was written.

Perhaps Mr Stephenson wanted to reach out to those who don't enjoy reading (supposedly) dry scientific non-fiction? Or perhaps he felt he just wanted to write it for his own amusement and, being an author with a successful track record, his publisher went among with him (much in the way that Doubleday let Asimov wrote whatever he felt like, happy to publish his whims in return for continued loyalty)?
Or perhaps some books, like life itself, have no objective "point" but rather the answer to the question "what is the point of this book?" can only be answered by the person asking the question. Who knows? I'm just sort-of free-form speculating wildly here (as I'm sure you can tell!). All I can say for sure, being only 200-odd pages in, is that I'm enjoying the journey and its means of conveyance and not overly worried about the destination.

Absolutely! In particular as this has 1000 pages or so. We'd never get on with saying anything... :-)
Or perhaps he felt he just wanted to write it for his own amusement Ha ha he certainly did not write it for mine :-)
the answer to the question "what is the point of this book?" can only be answered by the person asking the question Ah. Good. None then. Next!
I'm enjoying the journey and its means of conveyance and not overly worried about the destination. Oh! There is the point! Found it and thanks for pointing (no pun) this out. I totally get it - enjoy the ride, and if you still like it on p1000, you can look forward to two (three, actually, plus the prequel) more tomes of this nature. And perhaps you still have time to read around the subject, as a friend of mine did. The time is fascinating, and I did enjoy parts of the book. Wait until you get to the minute descriptions of 17th C London - for a while I was looking at spaces in London with the eye of somebody living here in the 17th C. Enjoy!
P.S. - what I thought of the book, I expressed in my longish review... no reason you should read it but if you are interested what I really thought (but why would you :-), that would be the source. Cheers, Mark


It will definitely be a feat if I complete that book.

that Doubleday let Asimov wrote whatever he felt like, happy to publish his whims in return for continued loyalty
I'd be surprised if Doubleday lost money on anything that the Good Doctor wrote.
Having tried (and given up on) this ramble, and knowing that Stephenson probably has some good ideas in there, I'd pay for an Asimovian synopsis - if not his outright rewrite.

There you go.
I bought this book about 6 years ago. I'm on attempt 5 now I would say. My issue is(nothing to do with the book itself), is I always start from the beginning each time. i don't trust myself to remember each and detail. So, hopefully, this time!

