Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Mark Desrosiers's Reviews > Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds

Genius by Harold Bloom
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
88991
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: reference

I never figured Harold Bloom for the trendy-Hollywood type, but you should know that he uses the Kabbalah to organize this mostly obvious mishmash of canonical geniuses and pseudo-geniuses. You can almost hear him sigh heavily before going on about some of the more, how to say it, un-Bloomable choices (e.g. Muhammad or Victor Hugo). Also, his firm battles on behalf of the "canon" have probably kept him away from stumbling on genius in other places. Creative genius needs a more enthusiastic tour guide, not this out-of-breath old soldier from the battle of Shrewsbury Clock.
1 like ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Genius.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
October 26, 2007 – Shelved
October 26, 2007 – Shelved as: reference

Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Steven Mclain If someone like Madonna, or any other prattling coffee-shop intellectual had arranged their book using the Kabbalah as signposts and touchstones, they would have been lauded as inspirational or revolutionary. That Harold Bloom does it makes one reconsider the way in which one thinks about genius and the markers of greatness. As to the concern that "creative genius needs a more enthusiastic tour guide," one can hardly think of anyone who might have assayed the depths of literature with more gusto (let alone, have read them to begin with). Bloom is remarkably enthusiastic, offering keen, illuminating insights without regard to post-Foucault political/gender/sociological interpretations. For Bloom, the foremost marker of greatness is the revelation of the individual, which he elaborates in his opus "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human." Moreover, the definition of "canon" that he uses is one which does not care whether a writer was male, female, black, white or any combination betwixt. Canon is the measure of a truly aesthetic ideal; indeed, he argues, to be included in the canon is a measure of how beautiful, sublime or subtle a work is. Therefore, the measure of inclusion is the canon itself.


back to top