Kalliope's Reviews > Schachnovelle
Schachnovelle
by

This book is about the workings of the mind.
But before I go into that, let me start by saying that to me the name of Stefan Zweig evokes a feeling of nostalgia. Of course, this is foremost due to the title of his famous memoirs, and because we know that he belonged to a world that was disappearing. And probably because he realized this he decided to depart from it.
But for me it creates an additional longing. It makes me yearn for a world in which I did not yet exist, a world that followed Zweig’s. In particular the beginning of this novel, which starts out in a ship travelling from New York to Buenos Aires, at a time when these two cities, together with Shanghai, were the most cosmopolitan centers in the world, made me think of a few decades later when my parents were young and left their country and boarded on ships that would take them to New York and to Buenos Aires and other places.
Nostalgia is also part of our fantasy.
Zweig’s novella is a meditation on the nature of the mind: how it creates its own reality, how it lives thanks to sensations and perceptions, but also on how it can get trapped and fall prey to circular thinking.
His story makes you think about the heart of imagination, what is the feeling of anticipation and how an inner mental projection can elicit joy. Zweig presents how curiosity provides a pleasure that the mind needs, but if this curiosity is not tamed it can also enslave the mind. Similarly, surprise is conceived as sudden state that gives fresh air to the mind. For the reader it is easy to identify those mental phenomena, because Zweig focuses on the effects that an object, which is both simple and complex, can provide. Such delicious and nourishing food for the mind is brought about by a book.
Through Zweig’s writing we observe the process of thinking and learning and problem solving, and how these constitute the gymnastics of the brain. The mind needs to explore its limits and exert itself. It needs to surmount obstacles and for this some degree of discipline is required. Understanding, creativity, the power of the brain when it concentrates on a single task, the agility and flexibility that it is capable of-- all of these aspects parade through this tale.
We also see that if the mind’s nature is abstract it, however, also has to be able to project outside itself. It needs to record what is in the world and absorb it, and if its space and universe is limited, its locked up habitat will be disastrous. This is what Zweig calls materielle Exterritorialisierung.
By studying what happens to the mind when it is put in a vacuum, in isolation, when it is on a diet of sensory stimuli, which is its vital source of energy, Zweig creates a situation of despair, a monotony that would only sound like a single tone with no rhythm. He presents us the mental existence of Nothingness, in which one can only enslave himself (Der Sklave des Nichts).
Because related to sensory input and the capability to project onto larger space, for the mind, in spite of its cogito abilities it is essential to be able to deal with one of the most abstract concepts: it needs to measure time. If one is deprived of a system of proportions, time just does not exist: it conflates. And the mind is in the void.
It is then that consciousness can split, because the mind has turned against itself, and dichotomies and paradoxes and impossibilities relish in this new schizophrenic self. The poisonous obsessions possess the psyche. Anxiety and patience confront each other like opposing players in a chess game.
Either Nonsense or a new Self emerges.
And of course, all of the above is developed through a gripping plot.
by

Kalliope's review
bookshelves: austro-hungary, fiction-german, latam, 2014
Apr 18, 2014
bookshelves: austro-hungary, fiction-german, latam, 2014
Read 2 times. Last read April 18, 2014 to April 21, 2014.

This book is about the workings of the mind.
But before I go into that, let me start by saying that to me the name of Stefan Zweig evokes a feeling of nostalgia. Of course, this is foremost due to the title of his famous memoirs, and because we know that he belonged to a world that was disappearing. And probably because he realized this he decided to depart from it.
But for me it creates an additional longing. It makes me yearn for a world in which I did not yet exist, a world that followed Zweig’s. In particular the beginning of this novel, which starts out in a ship travelling from New York to Buenos Aires, at a time when these two cities, together with Shanghai, were the most cosmopolitan centers in the world, made me think of a few decades later when my parents were young and left their country and boarded on ships that would take them to New York and to Buenos Aires and other places.
Nostalgia is also part of our fantasy.
Zweig’s novella is a meditation on the nature of the mind: how it creates its own reality, how it lives thanks to sensations and perceptions, but also on how it can get trapped and fall prey to circular thinking.
His story makes you think about the heart of imagination, what is the feeling of anticipation and how an inner mental projection can elicit joy. Zweig presents how curiosity provides a pleasure that the mind needs, but if this curiosity is not tamed it can also enslave the mind. Similarly, surprise is conceived as sudden state that gives fresh air to the mind. For the reader it is easy to identify those mental phenomena, because Zweig focuses on the effects that an object, which is both simple and complex, can provide. Such delicious and nourishing food for the mind is brought about by a book.
Through Zweig’s writing we observe the process of thinking and learning and problem solving, and how these constitute the gymnastics of the brain. The mind needs to explore its limits and exert itself. It needs to surmount obstacles and for this some degree of discipline is required. Understanding, creativity, the power of the brain when it concentrates on a single task, the agility and flexibility that it is capable of-- all of these aspects parade through this tale.
We also see that if the mind’s nature is abstract it, however, also has to be able to project outside itself. It needs to record what is in the world and absorb it, and if its space and universe is limited, its locked up habitat will be disastrous. This is what Zweig calls materielle Exterritorialisierung.
By studying what happens to the mind when it is put in a vacuum, in isolation, when it is on a diet of sensory stimuli, which is its vital source of energy, Zweig creates a situation of despair, a monotony that would only sound like a single tone with no rhythm. He presents us the mental existence of Nothingness, in which one can only enslave himself (Der Sklave des Nichts).
Because related to sensory input and the capability to project onto larger space, for the mind, in spite of its cogito abilities it is essential to be able to deal with one of the most abstract concepts: it needs to measure time. If one is deprived of a system of proportions, time just does not exist: it conflates. And the mind is in the void.
It is then that consciousness can split, because the mind has turned against itself, and dichotomies and paradoxes and impossibilities relish in this new schizophrenic self. The poisonous obsessions possess the psyche. Anxiety and patience confront each other like opposing players in a chess game.
Either Nonsense or a new Self emerges.
And of course, all of the above is developed through a gripping plot.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Schachnovelle.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
(Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012
– Shelved
(Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012
– Shelved as:
austro-hungary
(Other Paperback Edition)
December 3, 2012
– Shelved as:
fiction-german
(Other Paperback Edition)
April 18, 2014
–
Started Reading
April 18, 2014
– Shelved
April 21, 2014
– Shelved as:
austro-hungary
April 21, 2014
– Shelved as:
fiction-german
April 21, 2014
– Shelved as:
latam
April 21, 2014
–
Finished Reading
February 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
2014
Comments Showing 1-50 of 77 (77 new)
message 1:
by
Garima
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 21, 2014 02:47AM

reply
|
flag


Yes, I did and was disappointed.. a shame.. excellent actors, but they trivialized the work and life of Zweig with such an approach.


Yes, I did and was disappointe..."
:( I wanted to see that one.

Yes, I did an..."
Go and watch it, Agnieszka, it is still worth watching.. Excellent actors, and very creative.. It is just that for me the main attraction was its relation with Stefan Zweig.

Thank you, Elena.
It is a wonderful work. I actually read it two times, since it can be read in two sittings, and I thought that I wanted to think about it.. The first read is captivated by the story, and in the second I realized how Zweig is really exploring the mind.

Non-chessplayers do not realize the extent to which chess is a sport and not an intellectual pursuit. It is a pity that the game cannot live up to its reputation...

That is very interesting - the different projections of chase and mathematics... do you know the story? - I mean about the imprisonment of one of the characters?.
I think Zweig was a chess "aficionado" but I ignore how good he was.


The current world chess champion, Magnus Carlsen, is an interesting person to think about in the context of this story. There was an interview last year which has already become classic. The interviewer asked Carlsen what animal he would like to be. Carlsen thought a moment and said a crocodile. He would just lie there most of the time, not doing anything, but when someone came too close he would fasten his jaws on them and there would be nothing they could do. It is a striking image and an accurate description of his unpoetic playing style.

The current world chess champion, Magnus Carlsen, is an interesting person to..."
I see your point...
Charming, this Magnus Carlsen... do these people make a lot of money?

Not everyone likes him, but the general feeling in the chess world is that he's good for the game. He's an interesting person.

Yes, the political side, and how his chess playing by himself, helped him in his interrogations, was another interesting aspect.

Not everyone likes him, but the general feeling in ..."
I had to google him... may be his dream was realized..


Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every major tournament he has been in since (and including) the world championship has been televised.

Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every..."
That will also encourage many youngsters to engage in chess... a good thing..

Will have to look for this one.


Will have to look for this one."
Thank you, Rand. I recommend it to everyone with tge exception of chess players.

Yes, I found Luzhin's Defence utterly convincing. Poor Luzhin! Sometimes I almost feel I've met him in person...

Speaking of Carlsen's superstar status in Norway: we've actually started airing chess tournaments live on tv now! Every..."
So were you watching him beat Nakamura today?
I felt sorry for Naka in the post-match interview. He's usually so tough and positive, but it's hard to project that image when you've just been eaten by a crocodile.

Did you notice how he sat, Manny? The pose of a World Champion!



We also see that if the mind’s nature is abstract it, however, also has to be able to project outside itself. It needs to record what is in the world and absorb it, and if its space and universe is limited, its locked up habitat will be disastrous. This is what Zweig calls materielle Exterritorialisierung.
Excellent. I must read it again someday soon.

Thank you,Nicole.
Yes, that would have been an interesting pair.

Henry, don't miss it. It is an engrossing read and can also be read in a couple of sittings.


Magnus Carlsen broke all our hearts last year by defeating Viswanathan Anand (in Chennai if I remember correctly) who had been the undisputed world champion for years on a stretch. Carlsen showed us that Vishy is getting old and it's time for the world to hail a new master.

I was also very disappointed with Anand's showing in last year's encounter. But did you notice that he defied everyone's expectations by winning the Candidates Tournament a few weeks ago to get himself a rematch against the Crocodile? His form seems to have miraculously returned... even though he's clearly the underdog (what chance does a dog have against a croc?), he may surprise us again. I think it will be more interesting than the first match, anyway.

I fully understand the warmth that a first read will later elicit. My first German book was Homo Faber.

Yes I am waiting for their rematch as well. Seems like the defeat hit him hard enough to want to take a break from chess. Although every time I look at Carlsen I lose hope. He has this predatory, vicious look about him that is quite intimidating to be frank. The crocodile analogy is apt, perhaps.

A practical problem is that the match will most likely be in Norway, so Carlsen will have the home crowd rooting for him. Anyway, we will see!

I guess Zweig had grown up in that Paul Morphyish world where very clever laypeople really could peer at a chess board and conceive of logical brilliancies that had so far eluded plodding ‘professional� players (insofar as such things existed). Whereas today, so much of professional chess skill is built on knowledge of the patterns and statistics of past encounters, and how to turn that knowledge into some kind of deeper understanding of how to manipulate the rhythms of the game. At least that's how it seems to me.

People who haven't seen it might like to check out . Einstein turns out to be a reasonable weak amateur player; Oppenheimer is a patzer. Unfortunately, even if you're an uncontested genius, it doesn't help your chess much.

This is a good introduction to Zweig.


But I wonder if this has not changed from the way it was in the 1930s (another "world" gone). For example, in the world of pianists there has also been a huge change. Now we have the cult of the virtuoso, and the way piano-playing, particularly for kids, is approached in Asia.
For me, though, and I think this is what I tried to show in the review is that even if the plot revolves around chess, the real theme was about what can happen to humans when incarcerated. It is more the humanitarian, humane, and political. The politics are not too explicit. It is Nazi times and practices, it is the Metropole hotel, but with only one reference to a specific event, Hitler's occupation of Bohemia. So, I have also liked Elena's interpretation of a more general "Widerstand" from the Humanists to the Fascists.

Well, I also read this years ago... and this second reading has been completely different....
I plan to read his The Post-Office Girl during this year...

But I wonder if this has not changed from the way it was in the 1930s (another "..."
It is true that it was more plausible in the 30s. But even then, hard to believe: Alekhine was world champion, a tough professional player who had decisively beaten the natural talent Capablanca in 1927.
It is of course silly to go into these fine points of chess history when discussing a work of literature! But when you're a chessplayer, it is impossible not to. It is your world, that's the way you see it; ignoring these details is as impossible as ignoring the various changes of regime in 19th century French history when reading a Balzac novel.
Different people read the same text in different ways :)

Different people read the same text in different ways :)
..."
I agree, and now you have made me curious about this other world (my next stop is Nabokov). I am just trying to defend Zweig's novel rather than my interpretation... In a way, the more interpretations the more interesting is the work...

The world of chess is quite fascinating...

You should come up with the word... I also have trouble with Hemingway...

Reading Thomas Mann's Doctor Faustus, I found a passage on Harmonics which I tested on the piano, but since I don't consider myself an expert I sent it to my former teacher (Composer- Juilliard & Yale), and yes, it was gibberish.