Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

I went to a performance of Phaidra and Hippolytos this week, and it left me confused.

Being familiar with Euripides' and Racine's plays, I can't stop thinking about the idea behind the changes that were put on stage in this modern adaptation. The main dramatic problem in the original myth is that Hippolytos rejects Phaedra, and her later actions all derive from the fact that her burning love is unrequited. However, in the performance this week, they clearly and visibly had quite brutal on-stage sexual intercourse. Why? What does it do to the Greek myth to interpret it in this new (opposite) light? If the "guilt" is shared, the situation must be entirely different.

In Christa Wolf's brilliant take on Medea, the question of guilt is moved from the traditional revenge to more complex power structures, including a deliberate destruction of Medea's reputation in order to justify her brutal removal from her position. Is that what happens to Phaedra too if she shares a sexual experience with Hippolytos. Is she more or less guilty for having completed the act? Hippolytos, in any case, does not remain chaste and innocent, even though he clearly is Phaedra's victim. Is this a #metoo take on myth? With a male victim who gives in to power play against his will and then carries the burden without daring to speak?

I am still not sure whether I liked the performance or not, but I am entirely sure that Greek plays, and their eternal reinterpretations by generations of storytellers, are the stuff that humans are made of, and remade of, over and over again.

We live and breathe Greek tragedy!