Hans's Reviews > The Sorrows of Young Werther
The Sorrows of Young Werther
by
by

This is a dangerous book. For anyone who has suffered from that unrequited love that burns like a fever will be able to relate uncannily well with this book. Unfortunately the ending is such that it inspired many people to use it like a template for their own lives when faced with a similar situation. While finishing up this book I wondered whether Goethe was ever aware or thought about the painful actions his book inspired.
This is a fictionalized autobiography of Goethe's own experience of being in love with a woman he could never have. The experience was obviously very painful for him. His writing style has powerful clarity that can easily pull you into the story causing you to ache with the main character and laugh at the same time. To me this was an example of the dark-side of romanticism. The main character, Werther, was so obsessed and fixated on Charlotta (the woman he loves) that it was as if he wasn't even seeing her anymore. What he was in love with was an idea, not actually her, he was in love with his own ideal of her. This is the grand delusion that romantics feed themselves and they do it to such excess that their behavior seems pitiable. I would only recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand what obsession with another human being looks like. This mindset is as unhealthy as attaining the object, and I say object because that is what the idealized Charlotta became, would likely only reveal his delusion.
Romanticism is an example of looking for a personal messiah in love. Someone who we can pin all of our hopes and dreams on to pull us out of the human condition we find ourselves stuck in. A quest for transcendence through the love of another. But placing that responsibility on the shoulders of someone else will always disappoint and rightly so. We can not give to another what only we can do for ourselves.
I would only cautiously recommend this book. Realists could handle it, but dreamers beware.
This is a fictionalized autobiography of Goethe's own experience of being in love with a woman he could never have. The experience was obviously very painful for him. His writing style has powerful clarity that can easily pull you into the story causing you to ache with the main character and laugh at the same time. To me this was an example of the dark-side of romanticism. The main character, Werther, was so obsessed and fixated on Charlotta (the woman he loves) that it was as if he wasn't even seeing her anymore. What he was in love with was an idea, not actually her, he was in love with his own ideal of her. This is the grand delusion that romantics feed themselves and they do it to such excess that their behavior seems pitiable. I would only recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand what obsession with another human being looks like. This mindset is as unhealthy as attaining the object, and I say object because that is what the idealized Charlotta became, would likely only reveal his delusion.
Romanticism is an example of looking for a personal messiah in love. Someone who we can pin all of our hopes and dreams on to pull us out of the human condition we find ourselves stuck in. A quest for transcendence through the love of another. But placing that responsibility on the shoulders of someone else will always disappoint and rightly so. We can not give to another what only we can do for ourselves.
I would only cautiously recommend this book. Realists could handle it, but dreamers beware.
1054 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Sorrows of Young Werther.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 16, 2010
– Shelved
(Other Paperback Edition)
April 15, 2010
–
Started Reading
April 15, 2010
– Shelved
April 20, 2010
–
Finished Reading
April 11, 2011
– Shelved as:
german-literature
Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
P.
(last edited Apr 28, 2010 12:05PM)
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Apr 28, 2010 11:56AM

reply
|
flag





Goethe always claimed that Werther was bibliotherapy for him with regard to his own unhappy alliance with Charlotte Buff. However, that being said, and even though I like the novel, perhaps Goethe failed to realise the affect that Werther would have (I also think he was at that time yet unaware just how brilliant and influential a writer he was turning out to be). On the other hand, those who committed suicide after reading Werther were likely already rather unstable to begin with.



I may join your little talk.
I did a presentation about this book and you are all right...at least a bit.
Goethe used Werther to write down his own experiences but he also wanted to get over his friend's suicide. it's been both. he did rewrite some parts but that was because another friend who would be Albert in the book complained that he is pictured so badly. Goethe changed that and made Werther accept and maybe even befriend Albert in a way.
However I liked this book. it expresses emotions and the influence nature has on our mindset. and how our impressions can change depending on our general mood.
and I don't think Goethe knew what this book would do. he wasn't that famous befkre its release. So I guess he would have never thought he would just reach such an audience. So thinking about the consequences wouldn't be that important.
I did a presentation about this book and you are all right...at least a bit.
Goethe used Werther to write down his own experiences but he also wanted to get over his friend's suicide. it's been both. he did rewrite some parts but that was because another friend who would be Albert in the book complained that he is pictured so badly. Goethe changed that and made Werther accept and maybe even befriend Albert in a way.
However I liked this book. it expresses emotions and the influence nature has on our mindset. and how our impressions can change depending on our general mood.
and I don't think Goethe knew what this book would do. he wasn't that famous befkre its release. So I guess he would have never thought he would just reach such an audience. So thinking about the consequences wouldn't be that important.







