Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Helle's Reviews > Ham on Rye

Ham on Rye by Charles Bukowski
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6909470
's review

liked it
bookshelves: american

Holy shit!

This is the story of Henry Chenaski, Charles Bukowski’s alter ego, who had a helluva depressing childhood in large part due to a father who was a real son of a bitch and whom I blame for Henry’s later love of the bottle, to a lesser extent due to the Depression that hit the States, and Los Angeles, when Henry grew up.

My heart bled for young Henry; like when his father forced him to mow the lawn when all the other kids on the street were out playing. When Henry was done, his father put his head down on the lawn, cheek on grass, spotted a stray blade of grass and (view spoiler).

There was something about his loneliness and his plight, in the first part of the book, which reminded me of Holden Cauldfield ( The Catcher in the Rye). Both Henry and Holden throw around goddamned tough language whenever possible but are essentially lost kids. (There’s even the word ‘rye� in the titles of both stories, surely two of the only titles in literary history to use that word).

Apart from his pestilential father, Henry suffered from the meanest boils imaginable and went through a horrible ordeal for years trying to get rid of them while being painfully aware that a head full of boils (not to mention a back) didn’t exactly attract the girls. At this point he met one of the few good people to cross his path during his childhood, the nurse who treated him for the boils: ‘She was the kindest person I’d met in eight years.� (Henry’s mother wasn’t unkind to Henry; she just didn’t stop Henry’s father but rather joined Henry in his victimhood).

As Henry grew up, the graphic details increased. There were perhaps one or two of these I could have done without, but you sense it’s part of the honesty project here; if Henry (a.k.a. Charles) thought about these things � as there’s evidence to support he did, excessively so � they went into the book. He got more obsessed with girls (and their legs, and their hair, and their�.), and as he grew older, he became obsessed with women. And with booze. He turned into the Bukowski I’d read about. This novel provided much of the background.

Here’s another classic and perhaps even defining situation: Right after his high school graduation, Henry’s father is � once again � on Henry’s case about not amounting to much. ‘Why did I have a son like you?� he says to Henry, comparing him to some other kid. ‘How come you never applied yourself?� etc. etc. No congratulations, no ‘good job, son � you did what I never managed to do�. None of that. I found myself saying out loud, (view spoiler)

While I felt for the kid Henry Chenaski, I felt increasingly annoyed with his unpleasant adult self who, perhaps unsurprisingly, seemed bent on drinking himself into a stupor and general oblivion whenever possible, picking fights and heading deliberately for the low life on skid row. As a young man he seemed determined to become a loser while disdaining anyone who wasn’t. Though somehow: Who could blame him?

It felt good to sit alone in a small space and smoke and drink. I had always been good company for myself.

Henry’s existential derailment seemed circular and monotonous towards the end, which perhaps underlines the authenticity and the tragedy of his life if not the sense of literary appreciation on my part. Still, there were many linguistic gems � in that completely non-show-off-y kind of way, which in some ways also characterizes Catcher: an informal, mid-20th century, colloquial tone which lays bare a life, sometimes annoys, sometimes draws on your sympathy, sometimes makes you laugh and often gives you glimpses of what kind of writer Hank/Charles was to become.

Potential landlord: You working?
Henry: I’m a writer
PL: You don’t look like a writer
H: What do they look like?

Even in Henry’s increasing feeling of alienation, we sense something else underneath the scarred surface, an energy with which he might learn to suppress his apparent death wish.

Words weren’t dull, words were things that could make your mind hum. If you read them and let yourself feel the magic, you could live without pain, with hope, no matter what happened to you.
43 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Ham on Rye.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 14, 2016 – Started Reading
July 14, 2016 – Shelved
August 8, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Seemita Your review is so much more balanced and precise, Helle! I wish I had kept your kinda clear head while evaluating Bukowski's exploits. But he really did get on my nerves because he never ever attempted a breakthrough. (view spoiler) But the child was quite vulnerable and my 2 stars were precisely for his plight. Thank you for being such a wonderful buddy to read with, Helle! I had a lovely time and I hope the next time around, we can pick a work that draws 5-stars from both of us! :)


message 2: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Two ham on rye in one day - I won't need lunch!
But seriously, it is very interesting to read yours and Seemita's reviews one after the other, Helle. I feel I'm walking around this book, getting a look at it from different sides - and it's getting more and more interesting by the minute. I think I might like Henry, in spite of all his boils and bitterness :-)


message 3: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl Beautiful encapsulation of Henry's distressing journey, Helle :)


Ilse Helle, I do not recall much from this as I read it about 25 years ago, but I loved to read your review, which made me feel so sorry for Henry/Charles's harsh plight as a kid while making me laugh at the same time. I presume it would have more impact on me reading it now, than it had in my rebellious but sober teens:).


Steven Godin Who can forget when Henry and friend are under the grandstand at the airshow staring at female genitalia with much interest! Classic!


message 6: by Perry (new)

Perry Helle, outstanding review of this book. I've almost picked up this book many times, but I've had this feeling that this or any other Bukowski would bring on the blues. I love blues music, but I don't like having the blues.


message 7: by Michael (new)

Michael Fabulous review. I may have read a few poems of his but didn't realize his serious efforts at novels. Got my attention with your vignettes despite the overall "B" grade. If you get into a writer sometimes the second best work is often rewarding to read.

For another Beat I wanted more writing out of Kerouac after On the Road and was satisfied to do Dharma Bums despite a lower rating.


Helle Seemita wrote: "Your review is so much more balanced and precise, Helle! I wish I had kept your kinda clear head while evaluating Bukowski's exploits. But he really did get on my nerves because he never ever attem..."

Seemita, it strikes me that we (all) approach reviews and books in similar ways, certainly differently and with different expectations, and so mine will never be lyrical while yours will always be. Vive la différence! But I'm glad I read this novel and glad that I got to peek inside CB's crazy, disillusioned head. Thank you, too, for the buddy read. Let's opt for something totally different next time to see where that takes us.


Helle Jean-Paul wrote: "Thank you Helle for a very interesting review. I saw Seemita's review on the news feed first and, like you, was impressed how she elevated the sour experience into something poetic. I greatly appre..."

I certainly don't want to cause any choleric attacks, Jean-Paul, and I have to say that, from what I've seen so far of your literary tastes, I wouldn't exactly recommend this novel to you. It's not actually the kind of thing I read that often either, but I find it rewarding to steer off my well-trodden path sometimes, and there were things I appreciated about this novel despite my three stars.


message 10: by Helle (last edited Aug 09, 2016 01:15AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Helle Fionnuala wrote: "Two ham on rye in one day - I won't need lunch!
But seriously, it is very interesting to read yours and Seemita's reviews one after the other, Helle. I feel I'm walking around this book, getting a ..."


Ha - yes, indeed, Fionnuala: Seemita's and my common friends were a bit sandwiched there. And if you have an affinity for booze-afflicted would-be (and gonna-be) writers, Bukowski's your man. I did think this novel offered some interesting insights but also felt a bit bogged down by the unsurprising inertia at the end. You might like Henry, too, precisely because of that eclectic mix of boils, bitterness, booze - and emotional rawness, occasional wisdom and love of words.


Helle Cheryl wrote: "Beautiful encapsulation of Henry's distressing journey, Helle :)"

Thank you very much, Cheryl. 'Distressing journey' is an apt description of this coming-of-age story, in which I dare say Henry only partly succeeds in coming of age.


Helle Ilse wrote: "Helle, I do not recall much from this as I read it about 25 years ago, but I loved to read your review, which made me feel so sorry for Henry/Charles's harsh plight as a kid while making me laugh a..."

Ilse, I recall next to nothing from the books I read as a teen, and of course only the ones we believe most worthy will queue up again for a second reading. I imagine I wouldn't have felt so much pain for the kid Henry as a teenager as I do now, and I might not have felt that much empathy with the adult, disillusioned Henry. Thanks for stopping by!


Helle Steven wrote: "Who can forget when Henry and friend are under the grandstand at the airshow staring at female genitalia with much interest! Classic!"

Ah, yes, I quite remember that scene, too. In fact, I had it in mind when I wrote this He got more obsessed with girls (and their legs, and their hair, and their�.) but of course left it open for readers and non-readers of the novel alike to fill in the blank.


Helle Perry wrote: "Helle, outstanding review of this book. I've almost picked up this book many times, but I've had this feeling that this or any other Bukowski would bring on the blues. I love blues music, but I don..."

Perry, I think the overall tone of the novel ensures that it does not bring on the blues - at least it didn't for me, and I can be a pretty emotional reader sometimes, especially when children are involved. But he narrates it in a way which makes it part entertaining, part gruesome-truthful and part detached, I felt. So if you've wanted to pick it up sometimes, don't let that 'fear' stop you.


Helle Michael wrote: "Fabulous review. I may have read a few poems of his but didn't realize his serious efforts at novels. Got my attention with your vignettes despite the overall "B" grade. If you get into a writer so..."

Michael, I totally agree that it's not always the most known or hyped work of an author that one ultimately ends up appreciating the most. Edith Wharton (whom I know you've read, too) is a good example. I like many of her novels and adore her prose, but she really got me with Ethan Frome, which for some unfathomable reason is rated lower than most of her other novels here on GR.
Bukowski was certainly interesting if occasionally also annoying, and I'm glad I got acquainted with him. For some reason, I've always assumed I wouldn't like On the Road and so have avoided Kerouac altogether, so thanks for the tip - and for stopping by!


message 16: by Laysee (new)

Laysee Poor Henry! I bled for him just from reading your review, Helle. There's something to be said for the range of emotions a book like this is able to elicit. Love the quote at the end. It reminded me of what Jon K. Stefansson said about words being 'rescue teams'. Great review.


Helle Laysee wrote: "Poor Henry! I bled for him just from reading your review, Helle. There's something to be said for the range of emotions a book like this is able to elicit. Love the quote at the end. It reminded me..."

Thanks very much, Laysee. You are absolutely right in saying that it takes skill to write a book which can elicit such different emotions. That's usually one of the things I appreciate most in books. And yes, I remember that quote from Stefansson's book from various reviews. As voracious readers, I guess we often respond to writers who explictly share our love of words.


Helle Jean-Paul wrote: "Helle wrote: "Jean-Paul wrote: "Thank you Helle for a very interesting review. I saw Seemita's review on the news feed first and, like you, was impressed how she elevated the sour experience into s..."

I agree, Jean-Paul, that I think with age we become better at separating the wheat from the chaff in various aspects of life, be it books, people or things to spend our time on. So while I'd like to keep developing as a human being (which means sometimes treading down new paths), I also try to choose things that I believe I'll appreciate or enjoy, which I guess is what you're saying as well.


message 19: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine Zibas A very good review. He/the character he writes about seems hard to love, but people (including myself) are often so affected by events in their childhood that they spend their whole lives trying to make sense of them. Not always so traumatizing of course, but childhood can make us so vulnerable we often have difficulty overcoming these things which manifest themselves differently later on. Does that make sense?


Helle Christine wrote: "A very good review. He/the character he writes about seems hard to love, but people (including myself) are often so affected by events in their childhood that they spend their whole lives trying to..."

It absolutely makes sense, Christine, and I agree. I guess a lot of writers write in order to make sense of some of those things, and I think the good reader tries to empathize with characters (indirectly writers, to some extent) despite the childhood dramas or events being different. The 'problem' would be if certain events or moments become defining traumas which prevent people (writers and non-writers alike) from seeing other aspects of themselves and their history - an all-too human challenge, I suspect.


message 21: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine Zibas An astute observation, Helle. I wonder if Bukowski would have been so prolific if he had a happier life -- or maybe he just would have produced a different type of poetry and prose? Some argue that it is the adversity that produces great art and civilizations. Well, I guess we should get something out of all that suffering. But does it need to be that painful?


message 22: by Dolors (new)

Dolors Perfect review to compliment Simi's insightful glance into Bukowski's style, Helle. You know I have a penchant for despicable heroes (hence my love for Banville and Dostoyevski), but there has to be some existential introspection, some inner struggle besides the auto-destructive actions that usually befog the judgment of such controversial characters. Bukowski didn't write to connect with others, he imploded inwardly, not caring what the resulting picture would look like. That might work for some readers, but not for all. A fantastic, incredibly balanced review, which steers me away from re-reading this author...and no regrets! ;P


Helle Christine wrote: "An astute observation, Helle. I wonder if Bukowski would have been so prolific if he had a happier life -- or maybe he just would have produced a different type of poetry and prose? Some argue that..."

Good point, Christine. It seems a bit pointless if that's all they do (recycle the same pain in different books). I recall reading that Hemingway wrote as a way out of his pain; again, given how it ended for him, he clearly didn't quite succeed. On the other hand, who knows what would have happened if he/they hadn't chosen to write...?


Helle Dolors wrote: "Perfect review to compliment Simi's insightful glance into Bukowski's style, Helle. You know I have a penchant for despicable heroes (hence my love for Banville and Dostoyevski), but there has to b..."

That is a very perceptive observation, Dolors, and I totally agree with you. As much as I felt for the young man and the child, Henry Chenaski, I just couldn't muster any continued connection to him - precisely (I see now) because he didn't seem intent on creating a connection! And I guess that's what I first and foremost look for in literature - a way of connecting with the characters in it, sometimes the author. Thanks for finding and commenting on this review, Dolors. It missed your voice!


back to top