Daniel's Reviews > Anthem
Anthem
by
by

Mocking, Childish Review
The ending, with the Statue of Liberty emerging from the beach, was a nice twist. "You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!" As it turns out, it was Earth all along.
And, yes, for those keeping score at home, I do intend to use this exact same review for every dystopian novel I read. At least I amuse myself and, really, isn't that what matters most?
Slightly Less Childish Review
Look, I fully appreciate how Ayn Rand and her family suffered at the hands of the Soviets before she fled for America in the 1920s, and I understand how that would lead her to develop her virulently anti-socialist philosophy and write novels decrying the most dehumanizing aspects of communism. But, as with most propaganda -- and I don't use that word pejoratively, but simply to mean literature used to promote a cause -- it's got an expiration date. It's been two decades since the Berlin Wall fell, and for the vast majority of the world, communism isn't much of a threat anymore. So, aside from studying the history of communism, is there much reason to read such propaganda at this point, especially propaganda as lacking in literary value as "Anthem" and Rand's other books?
Aside from plus-sized, pain-killer-addicted Republican talk-radio hosts and octogenarian former Federal Reserve chairmen, who takes this horseshit seriously at this late date?
OK, in addition to the aforementioned, I guess there's one other group of readers for Rand's novels even in the 21st century: self-centered, bookish teenagers seeking affirmation for their assumptions that they alone are individuals, they alone have it all figured out, they alone understand how the world really works, and everyone else is a mindless conformist. Stupid sheep! Then, at some point, Lord willing, those readers grow the hell up, realize that no man is an island after all, and switch to reading real literature. (If not, they become the voice of the GOP, I guess.)
As for the rest of us? Readers wanting to reacquaint themselves with Rand's writing -- especially given the two new biographies out, and much media attention being paid lately to both Rand herself and her ongoing influence on the Republican Party -- can knock off "Anthem" in less than an hour, and not have to waste their time with the brick-sized "Atlas Shrugged" or "The Fountainhead." So "Anthem" gets an extra star for being mercifully short, I guess, and available for free on the Internet. And it's a slightly better book for teenagers than "Twilight," I suppose, with a marginally better message. Marginally.
The ending, with the Statue of Liberty emerging from the beach, was a nice twist. "You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!" As it turns out, it was Earth all along.
And, yes, for those keeping score at home, I do intend to use this exact same review for every dystopian novel I read. At least I amuse myself and, really, isn't that what matters most?
Slightly Less Childish Review
Look, I fully appreciate how Ayn Rand and her family suffered at the hands of the Soviets before she fled for America in the 1920s, and I understand how that would lead her to develop her virulently anti-socialist philosophy and write novels decrying the most dehumanizing aspects of communism. But, as with most propaganda -- and I don't use that word pejoratively, but simply to mean literature used to promote a cause -- it's got an expiration date. It's been two decades since the Berlin Wall fell, and for the vast majority of the world, communism isn't much of a threat anymore. So, aside from studying the history of communism, is there much reason to read such propaganda at this point, especially propaganda as lacking in literary value as "Anthem" and Rand's other books?
I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.
I am neither foe nor friend to my brothers, but such as each of them shall deserve of me. And to earn my love, my brothers must do more than to have been born. I do not grant my love without reason, nor to any chance passer-by who may wish claim it. I honor men with my love. But honor is a thing to be earned.
Aside from plus-sized, pain-killer-addicted Republican talk-radio hosts and octogenarian former Federal Reserve chairmen, who takes this horseshit seriously at this late date?
OK, in addition to the aforementioned, I guess there's one other group of readers for Rand's novels even in the 21st century: self-centered, bookish teenagers seeking affirmation for their assumptions that they alone are individuals, they alone have it all figured out, they alone understand how the world really works, and everyone else is a mindless conformist. Stupid sheep! Then, at some point, Lord willing, those readers grow the hell up, realize that no man is an island after all, and switch to reading real literature. (If not, they become the voice of the GOP, I guess.)
As for the rest of us? Readers wanting to reacquaint themselves with Rand's writing -- especially given the two new biographies out, and much media attention being paid lately to both Rand herself and her ongoing influence on the Republican Party -- can knock off "Anthem" in less than an hour, and not have to waste their time with the brick-sized "Atlas Shrugged" or "The Fountainhead." So "Anthem" gets an extra star for being mercifully short, I guess, and available for free on the Internet. And it's a slightly better book for teenagers than "Twilight," I suppose, with a marginally better message. Marginally.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Anthem.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
November 1, 2009
–
Finished Reading
November 2, 2009
– Shelved
November 2, 2009
– Shelved as:
2009
December 6, 2009
– Shelved as:
erica-and-diane-club
Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Louise
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Nov 02, 2009 10:49PM

reply
|
flag




Ding ding ding! I do believe this explains Rand's continuing popularity. I am a rock, I am an iiiiiisland...






Elizabeth, you make a good point. On the other hand, reading Ayn Rand will at least give you some insight into the thinking of some of the awful people who occupy high positions in U.S. government and finance, while reading "Twilight" won't teach you anything except that people who like "Twilight" are retarded. I guess that's sort of useful, if you didn't already realize how retarded the vast majority of people are.

And no, I'm sure it's not just that I have a bad memory and knew I had seen a movie at the Egyptian with both of you but couldn't remember which film with which person.



An interesting question, not to mention review. To see what things were like, I guess? Even though I can't stand the way she writes, I certainly find Rand interesting.
A lot of the time, the nature of propaganda seems to be antagonistic to artistic merit, so I think it's important not to single Rand out on that matter. Not that you were or anything - just wandering off on my own little tangent.




The big problem with this very true statement is that people who feel this way (unfortunately I know some who are no longer teenagers...) are already generally pompous assholes. Rand's work only justifies their behavior and makes them feel further intellectually superior. It pains me.
Great review, by the way.

Daniel wrote: "Good points, Choupette. One interesting comparison for Ayn Rand's novels might be a book I had in the back of my mind when I wrote my review but didn't mention for some reason: "The Moon is Down" b..."
I've only read Atlas Shrugged, but I do think it has some (not much) literary merit. Her writing has real emotional force, and there are some things she depicts quite well. Especially when you compare it to some of the so-called 'art' produced in Soviet Russia or the ballets choreographed in China during Mao's rule, this actually seems like quite good stuff, even if it's not as good as the Steinbeck you mentioned. It's a continuum, I suppose.
I wonder if part of the difference lies in who or what they were propagandising for? Rand and Steinbeck (I assume, not knowing anything about the book) were writing propaganda to promote their own beliefs, original ideas they had thought up themselves, whereas the propaganda-art produced in totalitarian states was actively discouraged from being original in any way (though I'm sure there are exceptions, of course - Riefenstahl?). I think this is why I have some respect for Rand. Maybe it's wrong of me, but I do admire her for believing in something so strongly.




First off the quotes you use as a affront to your sensibilities is something all humans feel at regular intervals in life. In fact most of life is about "ME/I", Course it also almost as much about the We/Us.
If you did not choose a political side in your review(By condemning one side several times) of which obviously is to lead us to assume you to be on the more enlightened other side, and ironically the tolerant side, of which we forget means inclusive.
Then I would accept your review for a honest unbiased opinion.
look, The Right is just as much part of America and the people as the Left is, In fact it's basically the Yin and Yang of America.
Everyone is Conservative and everyone is Liberal to a certain extant. Only a fool who wasn't honest with themselves and a shallow thinker has not already come to this conclusion.
Now one can choose to think of one side as bad and one side as good but that's a fools prejudice errand. The good and bad is inherent in both.
It's like When Bush was Bad(and hated for) His
Mid-east Conflicts
NSA
The Patriot Act
But the same people that hated him for supposedly his policies and not that he was Right/White. Not only forgave Obama for doubling down on those very same polices but refused to even acknowledge that those former hated polices were now even a problem worth mentioning.
Those were not even enlightened Sheep.
I learned the hard way(Former Liberal) but I now admit the truth and don't just blame one side and pretend I'm better because I think I'm on the side of the Angels.
Comes a time when one has to put down foolish things like believing in Santa Claus or Angels.