Reading the Chunksters discussion

This topic is about
Dune
Buddy Reads
>
Dune, Book 1, Frank Herbert

Some questions to ponder over while reading and discussing part I.
1. Are the pseudo-quotations helpful to understand the novel or is it a literary trick, a literary game, and nothing more?
2. What are your thoughts about the world we are plunged as readers?
3. Can we describe the conflict in terms of cultural war, namely East vs West or Europe vs Asia?
4. Is this planet Arrakis or Dune for you?
These are just starting points, but I will strongly encourage you to bring in some other points into the discussion.



It is a dramatic plunge:-)

Delmy, I read the book some time ago, but then a year ago I found a six-book set in the second-hand book store. It was brand new, published in late seventies. The prices on the back were so funny :-) The pages are yellow and the smell is specific, but they are still brand new. Possibly someone found in the attic. :-)

Delmy, I read the book some time ago, but then a year ago I found a six-book set in the se..."
I tried a second-hand store but no such luck! oh, well!

Is it possible that your library has ebooks as well as physical books? If you haven't a tried their audio/electronic lusts that might be another source for you. Also, the Kindle version costs about $5.70. Just throwing in some ideas. It can be frustrating to be on the waiting list.

:)

I'm struggling to understand what the conflicts and politics are about. I don't really get the setup yet. It seems organized on clan or feudal lines, but you'd expect that in relatively small societies, not in large nations or worlds.
I'm finding it a little sexist. The Bene Gesserit are all women, but the messiah they're waiting for has to be a man, and because he's a man he'll have extra powers...right. A sign of the times it was written I suppose, but somehow in scifi when the author is creating the world, it seems more his fault than in realist novels that reflect a society that actually exists.
ETA: Reading that over, it sounds a little negative but I am enjoying it! The descriptions of the planet are vivid - the idea of a planet where water is so scarce is very imaginative - and you certainly get thrown right into the action.



The Bene Gesserit are so weirdly freakish and as characters are one of the most original inventions in the science fiction, IMHO.
If you are familiar with the world of the fantasy series 'Wheel of Time', the Aes Sedai, the semi-secretive caste of women, then you might notice how they were molded after the Bene Gesserit.

It is definitely meta - ish, but quite enjoyable, in my opinion. Post-modernism was obviously quite pervasive and even penetrated genre literature :-)
On a personal note, have you enjoyed the Foundation series?

If you are familiar with the world of the fantasy series 'Wheel of Time', the Aes Sedai, the semi-secretive caste of women, then you might notice how they were molded after the Bene Gesserit."
Cool, I will look forward to discovering more about them as we go along. I haven't read the Wheel of Time series.
I didn't like Foundation ... maybe that's a bad sign? but Dune's characters already have more depth, which is the main thing I found lacking in Foundation.
And then Foundation (the first book) really had no female characters at all, so that's more points for Dune right there :)

I'm interested to find out if there is any connection to our own society, or if it is more like Star Wars where we are meant to assume it's a completely separate civilization.

One of the other parallels I've noticed between "Foundation" and "Dune" is how many of the chapters are basically dialogue. From reading "Dune" before, I know there is action coming, but I find it interesting how pervasive the role of dialogue and concepts is in both these books.



I read some years ago that Dune is a certain projection of the cultural war (West vs. East and the big oil ('spice' in the novel) lobby trying to fish in muddy waters of Middle East). Maybe this cultural paradigm will give you a certain feeling of sense and direction.
On the other hand, sci-fi is often hard to read because of the emotional bond. We usually easily establish bonds with characters from literary fiction or even historic fiction because the world is familiar (ours), and the stories focus primarily on few characters. In sci fi, much effort is devoted to world-building, and the events are often panoramic, not individualistic, and some characters (not all) turn into mechanical toys, and we feel that we are emotionally severed from them.



What did you find the most intriguing: the world-building, the setting, the nearly feudal politics, or the secret organization, cultivating the idea of the Messiah, Kwisatz Haderach?

So far I appreciate the politics of the conflicting families (Atreides vs Harkonnen) and I am intrigued by the "Bene Gesserit" order. I do know that there is so much in the saga that I have to get to know.
I like the pseudo-quotations, it allows some clues/insights in the story that is developing.
As a first time reader, I felt dropped into a strange world with little introduction, so I had to return back and re-read passages and/or check on the name of places/characters to make sense of them. I guess I'm still adjusting

I'm fascinated by the worms. I want to know more about them and what is their relationship to the spice. I think there's more than meets the eye, there.

(view spoiler)
P.S. Herbert also explores cultures and religions in this series. Do you feel the whiffs of our modern religions in his book so far?

I guess it's the idea that people can be manipulated so easily. I want to admire the Fremen, but if they have been so easily taken in by having the whole Messiah expectation imposed on them, I don't know.
And yet Paul picked the Maud'Dib name without knowing what it was going to be. And he clearly sees the future, or at least future possibilities.
For me, the book raises the questions - was Jesus the Messiah? Was Mohammed the Messiah? Or was there no Messiah, but the people of those times expected one strongly enough to give those prophets that name?
I love that Paul sees the possibility of religious crusades/jihads being undertaken in his name and is desperately seeking a way to avoid that happening. Maybe Frank Herbert thought Jesus (and Mohammed?) would have wanted to avoid all the violence that has happened in their names, too.

Rosemary wrote: I want to admire the Fremen, but if they have been so easily taken in by having the whole Messiah expectation imposed on them, I don't know.
I think you're being a little hard on the Fremen here. The Bene Gesserit has been pulling strings for a very long time, it's not like the Fremen have fallen for a parlor trick...and after all, in the real world, all of western civilization has had a "messiah expectation" imposed on us for 2000 years!

Assuming it was deliberately sown...
I guess if you look at it like that, it's surprising there wasn't more of a Christian backlash against Dune - or maybe there was?

Ha, yeah that's getting into "conspiracy theory" territory there :) I wasn't saying there was a direct correlation, just that there are similarities in the cultural mindset - or at least there were in the relatively recent past. :)
Hmm...the reaction from religious viewpoints would be an interesting thing to look into, I found that I would like to read but really don't have time now... I will leave it here for later.

No wonder that the same human species from our future will still look for a certain sense of direction, a man who knows much and can foresee so much, a Messiah. I believe it is a profoundly human experience, not exactly logical or reasonable, but fundamentally human.
It is an interesting discussion you dug out, John. Let me be honest and maybe brutal and judgmental - as a secularist, I often snub religious forums, but this thread seems to be quite interesting.

On a side note, I am finishing book III in the first book and will be posting questions and comments soon.

I agree with Zulfiya, people do generally end up believing in the fantasy they create, if they don't at the beginning, the will start eventually.

(view spoiler)
When are we starting the second book?


I read Dune ( the first one, but not the series) back in HS and it knocked me on my butt. So I welcomed the opportunity to complete the series with this group. (I'm a bit behind already, having just finished a reread of the first third.) Once again I'm awestruck by the writing, the plotting, the world-building, the frickin scope of this saga. I'm so caught up in the characters and the story that it feels brand new. (Although, I remember crying over the Duke the first time.)
I love the reveal in the tent at the end of book one. The way it twists what you think you know, and makes the reader question every relationship, every motive, every point of view. Great stuff!
Because in the buddy read we usually discuss one book in the same thread, please consider this post as the beginning of this thread. In this thread, we are going to discuss Book 1 only.
There are three parts (called books) in this novel. These can be used as certain bearings for us as I will encourage you to comment on these three parts separately.
PLEASE use the SPOILER HTML links to hide spoilers because there will be only one thread per each book in this series.
For example,
Dune, Book I
(view spoiler)[ I am really looking forward to this discussion because this is the novel when science fiction meets reality as it is the projection of our own world with allusions to the cultures of Middle East as well as environmental issues, planetology, gender exploration, and many other issues that were revolutionary for sci-fi of the sixties. (hide spoiler)]