Astronomy and Space exploration discussion

This topic is about
A Brief History of Time
DISCUSSIONS AND LATEST NEWS
>
A Brief History Of Time : Discussion Page
message 1:
by
Alok, Group founder
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jan 31, 2018 10:14PM

reply
|
flag

Ok Thank you both of you and i appreciate you both taking part in the Group read , But this is turning out to be a failure ..........Again!!!....i thought we will have more active readers...But ..i don't get it
Maybe we should just continue our normal discussions for now in the group ....I don't think we should have a group read any time soon......it will be a failure as it turns out !!!! ....

I actually read about 90 pages last month , but for the sake of Group reading , i have restarted .......right now i am near newton Theory of Gravity part

It's just like a miracle , everyone is popping up slowly..and i am happy about it , Good going guys ......
hahaha ....i am not used to being called moderator friend , you can call me Alok .......I am just one of you 57 people hoping for some knowledge and thanks for the compliment
Well .......i am just thinking of how many books you could have read in these thirty years following The Brief history of time , i am sure it's a lot of books ,you re a perfect guide for us young readers Mr.Bill , we are very glad to have you in the group , you could guide us in the right direction regarding books......

Ya but i needs a major update now , because it says Gravitational waves have not been discovered , but it was discovered in the end of 2016

i was going to say the same thing it is a good little humor which also tells us,how far ahead we actually are i am in the second chapter and it is bit of a history lesson too i m enjoying it though
In the second chapter , Mr Hawking Speaks a little about Poincare , If you know about the Great Millennium Problems , Poincare Conjecture is one among the 7 Millennium Problems .............Millennium problems are 7 Great and meaningful Mathematical problems Solving even one of those you would me awarded the Fields medals .....only one of those 7 problems are solved and that is Poincare Conjecture....other six are unsolved . This Conjecture was solved by Grigori Perelmen ....quite recently

same is true with the speed of light which acvording to Newton, could be relative & attain any values ... Rømer's work helped to agree on the finiteness in the speed of light, Fizeau worked on finding accurate value of speed of light, Michelson & Morley showed that the speed remains unchanged regardless of how you arrange your interferometer and finally Einstein made the foundation rock solid with his Special Relativity theory in 1905...
since then everybody became cautious of paradigm shifts which can happen anytime based on wild ideas but rooted to the systematic approach of science.
This book is among the very early attempts of scientists to make science accessible to every one... Happy reading !
that is a very good insight from Arko this book is very famous great and sold the copies it has sold majorly because it has almost all concepts of cosmology explained in a surprisingly simple way it is more reachable to a common man and it was a first of its kind . i am enjoying it very much reading it though

the basic idea is , Electrons give out light when it jumps from high energy level to low energy levels , Energy levels are , you can say different orbits , if electron jumps from higher orbit to lower orbit , it gives out a photon which is you can say a light particle of a certain wavelength , the electron which jumps from higher energy emits a light of shorter wavelength , keeping this idea in mind , now every element has its own number of energy levels and electron , and we now exactly know which elements gives out what spectra , when we create a spectrograph of a star we can compare it with out earthly analysis , we will know the composition of the star ........

Hi folks i am in 4th chapter. And i think this is a quite complicated compared to the other chapters

So, do I understad it correctly:
Protons and neutrons are made from quarks.
There are six flavours of quarks : top, bottom, up,downd, charm and strange.
The quarks are held together by strong forces:
Strong nuclear force, where messenger is Gluon
Electromagnetic force, where messenger is Photon.
Wesk nuclear force, that has three different messengers Vector Bosons W+,W-,Z^o.
Then there is Gravity with its graviton. That doesnt really work with the quantum world.
Each subparticle has a spin. Mass particles have 1/2 spin, force particles are either 0,1,2
Is this about right? Or do I need to read it again?


Weak force is that force which is responsible for radioactivity. Like the strong and electromagnetic forces, it is also found to be mediated by two types of bosons namely W (+/-) & Z. It can also be understood in this way that for a fermion to get converted into its other energetic but respective types ( like a quark to another quark or a lepton to another lepton) it requires this weak force to be active. Most importantly it should be noted that weak force and electromagnetic force are two sides of the same coin being called Electroweak force. Weinberg, Salam and Glashow showed in the 1960s how these two forces are unified and received the Noble prize of 1979 after experimental verification from Gargamelle chamber of CERN.
To answer your question on color, you should have in mind that color here is not the same color which we understand caused by the visible electromagnetic spectrum. Color charge is a property of quarks and gluons which interact via strong force. In 1964 Oscar Greenberg introduced the notion of color charge to explain how quarks could coexist inside some hadrons in otherwise identitical quantum states without violating the Pauli's Exclusion Principle. Pauli Exclusion Principle states that no two objects with all same quantum numbers can occupy the same quantum state, it is impossible for one particle to contain two of the same kind of quark. Yet the proton is found to be made up of two up quarks. Because of this contradiction, it was proposed that quarks must have another property with six manifestations: red green blue+ anti red antiblue anti green. This new property was labeled color and hence the subject of this study is called Quantum Chromo Dynamics. Whether it is a function of spin, that I personally dont know. I have scanty knowledge in QCD so far. I request input from others in this.
Thanks.



The Infinity Puzzle by Frank Close
Massive: Higgs Boson & the greatest hunt in science by Ian Sample
Particle Zoo by Gavin Hesketh
Smashing Physics By John Butterworth
Supersymmetry by Gordon Kane.
These are the books which I have read so far on particle physics...
You may also want to browse : A map of the invisible by John Butterworth.
Happy reading !

The Infinity Puzzle by Frank Close
Massive: Higgs Boson & the greatest hunt in science by Ian Sample
Particle Zoo by Gavin Hesketh
Smashing Physics By John Butterworth
Supersymmetr..."
Thank You so much!
And Arko , I just saw your post 2 hours back and i immediately posed the question to a professor i knew .....If spin and color are were dependent on each other ....and he said NO , But he couldnt justify it ......... But he was very sure about it

that is very kind of you to consult with a Professor.
thanks for recommending the book Particle hunters by Ne'eman.
I would try to read more on QCD.
on a different note I have also come across a book in Amazon by Wilczek named Lightness of being.... but I haven't purchased it yet... hoping it has something on QCD ...

Mrs hawkins answer to why she thought the book stayed for years on the top position of the best sellers' list, Well because it was written by my son"{ conceals perhaps, the unconscious reason. As for me, i got it for rs 2 from the footpath decades ago .
Even Mozart wrote some of his Compositions Just because he badly needed financial support , And centuries later , his music still remains the Greatest
Vivek wrote: "this book was written purely to tide over the financial crunch in which hawing found himself. For every equation, he was told, the sales would be cut by half. The amazing part is how difficult it a..."
That's great ...i had never heard of that
But my friend Vivek , i think you may be one of those "vast majority just left it partially read on their bookshelves" because i dont see it in your READ shelves ...i assume you haven't read it yet
That's great ...i had never heard of that
But my friend Vivek , i think you may be one of those "vast majority just left it partially read on their bookshelves" because i dont see it in your READ shelves ...i assume you haven't read it yet