English Mysteries Club discussion
Archived Buddy Reads
>
Continuing Buddy Read of the Sherlock Holmes stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, with Adrian

So chronologically speaking the stories were published as follows:-
* 1887: A Study in Scarlet
* 1890: The Sign of the Four
* July 1891 to December 1892: Stories that would make up The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes published in The Strand magazine
* December 1892 to November 1893: Stories that would make up The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes published in The Strand
* 1901-2 (serial): The Hound of the Baskervilles
* October 1903 to January 1905: Stories that would make up The Return of Sherlock Holmes published in The Strand
* 1908�1913, 1917: Stories that would make up His Last Bow (short stories).
* 1914-15: The Valley of Fear
* 1921�1927: Stories that would become The Casebook of Sherlock Holmes.
However, and this may be a tad controversial, but I would suggest especially for newbies to Holmes that we read them in the follow order :-
* The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (although Scandal in Bohemia must be the last read not the first) (12 short stories)
* A Study in Scarlet (novel)
* The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes (without The Final Problem) (12 short stories)
* The Sign of the Four (novel)
* The Final Problem from “Memoirs�
* The Return of Sherlock Holmes (13 short stories)
* His Last Bow (7 short stories - 8 in America)
* The Valley of Fear (novel)
* The Casebook of Sherlock Holmes (12 short stories) (Ending in “Shoscombe Old Place�)
* The Hound of the Baskervilles (novel)
Why the change to the published order, well :-
1. Whilst Study in Scarlet does introduce us to "Holmes" and "Watson", and them to each other, it is not a great introduction to them in a story situation
2. In addition I feel one should get to know “Holmes� (and Watson) in his short stories before reading a novel
3. Short story wise again, one should not start “Holmes� with Scandal in Bohemia, it should be read after knowing more about “Holmes�.
4. It is mandatory that one should read The Final Problem just before “The Return…�
5. To mix it up, novels should be read mixed in with the short stories ( with the exception of “Study� none of the other novels are really timelined with the short stories, so can be read anytime )
6. Although it isn’t the end chronologically, one should end with his greatest triumph - “The Baskerville Hound�
So how long am I anticipating it should take to read all these stories? Well I know some of us have a little more time now than we did a couple of months ago, but we all also have a lot of other challenges and commitments, both to books and other important things in life. So I’m going to take it easy and not force the pace, so I’m anticipating somewhere in the region of 18 months (plus), to read 5 books of short stories and 4 novels.
I would envisage the books of short stories taking 2 months each (so 6 stories a month roughly) and likewise the novels taking two months
I am more than open to suggestions re book order and timescale, so anyone who is interested in joining in or dropping in and out please let me know your thoughts. I just didn’t want it to be a chore or to create so much pressure that people didn’t want to participate.
So for anyone who does want to join in, please let me know and we can work out when to start. “Wexford Buddy Read� starts in May (I believe) so how’s June ?? That way we could finish around Christmas 2021 on Dartmoor !!!
Hi Adrian,
This all sounds excellent! Very well planned and I'm with your reasoning all the way :) I'm in!
This all sounds excellent! Very well planned and I'm with your reasoning all the way :) I'm in!

This all sounds excellent! Very well planned and I'm with you reasoning all the way :) I'm in!"
Me too. You can count me as a newbie (I know about Sherlock stories but I'm not sure which one I read before and I don't remember the story I read at all). Thank you, Adrian.

June sounds swell :)


This all sounds excellent! Very well planned and I'm with your reasoning all the way :) I'm in!"
Thanks Jean, it took a while to plough through all the info out there, but I wanted to ensure that it would be as enjoyable as possible for all participants.

I will publish which 6 stories we shall read in June and July nearer the time, but for anyone who wants to participate, get yourself a copy of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and prepare for some enjoyable mysteries.

The great thing about this is, that even if some of us are still in lockdown, with no libraries, we can still access these free online or on kindle :)




Thats really great carolina. I look forward to hearing your thoughts along with other peoples when we start next month.
Not long now so get your copy of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes ready for June !!

Over the next week I shall detail in which order we shall read the short stories in the book (as I mentioned above, I'm changing the published order, sorry Sir Arthur). So don't start yet !!

I know in some countries some of the same named books contain slightly different collections of stories, so I shall always detail the stories we shall be reading each month.
And as I mentioned we shall give the first story in the book a miss until later in our reading extravaganza, namely A Scandal in Bohemia .
So therefore, in June we shall be reading:-
The Red-Headed League
A Case of Identity
The Boscombe Valley Mystery
The Five Orange Pips
The Man With The Twisted Lip
The Blue Carbuncle
Please feel free to comment on each story as you read it, but remember that others may be yet to read a story, so please use the spoiler facility.
I'll probably write a bit more tomorrow, about the first story we shall be reading.

There are some really great short stories in these first six mentioned above, so I hope others enjoy as much as I do/will.
Have fun, and welcome to 221B Baker Street !!


And A Case of Identity, I think, and maybe its because I've read it before many times, seems to me a little obvious. I know there are a couple of mentions to stories we haven't read yet, but I ask you to bear with me, we will get there. Still an enjoyable story, demonstrating so many aspects of Holmes life, most notably his filing system.


Hi Carolina, glad to have you join us on our Sherlock Holmes journey. Unfortunately whilst there are many small "dingy" squares just off The Strand, Saxe Coburg is not one of them, and never has been. That said Sir Arthur would actually recognise many places from his 19th Century knowledge of London, especially around The Strand, which has changed hardly at all.
I think that one of Conan Doyle's talents is to draw in his readers heads a vision of many differing parts of London, from dingy squares to wide thoroughfares, and also the leafy suburbs (some now in Greater London).


I think you're exactly right about the (view spoiler) Sue.
It is such a memorable short story and a great place to start the journey through Holmes.

I know its only the 11th of June, but I have to admit I have already read all 6 of this month's short stories, I know, I know, I just couldn't resist 😊
Anyway I look forward to seeing other peoples thoughts through the next few weeks.

I had hoped to reread this via the Tantor audiobook I got in 2017 but for reasons I don't understand, although this story is supposed to be included, it isn't - it skips from "A Scandal in Bohemia" to "A Case of Identity". Luckily for me, I have a Kindle edition of The Complete Sherlock Holmes so I was able to compensate for this omission!
I had forgotten Watson's observations about Holmes' bipolar personality. It's interesting that Doyle had in this early story laid the foundation for the idea that Holmes, while brilliant, was mentally unstable.


It's never too late to join Leslie, you know that you are always welcome.
Yes it is interesting that this early in his writings about Sherlock Holmes that he "allowed" Watson to document his problems, as Holmes says "My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplaces of existence. These little problems help me to do so"

I really enjoyed the Boscombe Valley Mystery which as you say showed wonderfully how Holmes works.
I didn't mind 5 Orange Pips, but don't think it is one of the best as you say.

Staci


Glad my garbled instructions were good enough for you to find your way to our Group read Staci. I look forward to your thoughts.

Yes I too thought that [book:The Man with the Twisted Lip|5459311] was a really good short story and very original as you say.

I’m sure your answers are all a resounding yes and lol, did I just figure this out now? Even though I’ve always enjoyed Holmes giving me the time to see the clues I seriously just made the connection between Watson and the reader. I’ve been played and just now figured it out; silly me.

The reason I liked that particular story so much was that it so clearly illustrated the danger of preconception. A man is seen at the window of an opium den - his wife and others make assumptions based on what they believe rather than upon proven facts.

I’m sure your answer..."
Ha ha, thats very perceptive Staci. yes I agree entirely I think Watson is "us". He is not super intelligent like Holmes, so we as Watson see the normal things, whilst Holmes sees more. However there will be adventures when Watson provides the clue to solve the mystery, as Hastings does with Poirot, sometimes unintentionally.

I'm glad i'm not the only impetuous one. I think of the 6 stories I have read so far, The Man with the Twisted Lip has to be my favourite, like Leslie. And for exactly the same reason. ACD sets up a situation where everyone assumes one thing, but the reality is something else, without giving the game away.

I’m su..."
I think ACD set the precedent (which was then followed by Agatha Christie with Poirot & Hastings); the super-observent or smart detective with the more 'human' sidekick which allows the author to explain things to the reader. I recently finished R. Austin Freeman's Dr. Thorndyke series which also follows this pattern, with Dr. Thorndyke's associate Dr. Jervis being the 'Dr. Watson' (complete to the fact that the story is related from his point of view, at least in large part).
This convention doesn't bother me but perhaps it is because I am so inured to it! But it is a clever device which sometimes (less often than I would like) lets me as the reader figure something out before the sidekick, bringing a glow of satisfaction and triumph :-)

It is as you say a clever device to allow us to feel superior when ( or if in my case) you actually solve it before Watson/Hastings/Jervis/Milner/Havers/Lewis/Burden. And it works.

But I have been reading “The Red-Headed League� this evening and will continue on in the suggested order. Happy to join you all :)

But I have been reading “The Red-Hea..."
Ha ha, never mind, I'm glad you're with us. Maybe if I hadn't have read A Study in Scarlet myself already I would've felt the same. I just think whilst it does introduce us to them, and them to each other, it is better read when we know more about the characters. You can be all smug when we do get to read it.
Hope you enjoyed the Red Headed League.

Yes!! That cellar scene was great!

I agree...I feel in all the tv/movie versions that this is rather a bigger, well-known case and after reading it I was like, uhhhh why?!

Books mentioned in this topic
The Hound of the Baskervilles (other topics)The Hound of the Baskervilles (other topics)
The Annotated Sherlock Holmes (other topics)
The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes (other topics)
ABOUT SIXTY: Why Every Sherlock Holmes Story is the Best (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Graham Greene (other topics)Clive Merrison (other topics)
Clive Merrison (other topics)
Clive Merrison (other topics)
Clive Merrison (other topics)
More...
Without more ado, I'll pass you over to Adrian who will explain how he thinks of organising this, with timings, order etc.