Andreas Laurencius's Blog - Posts Tagged "technology"
Support 'The Memory Coding Project'
The science is here. The technology can be used to prevent death.
Please support by clicking the 'Like' button below this blog.
The time is now. Or would you rather wait for everything to end? Your loved ones? Yourself?
I won't respond to religious questions and I suggest that everyone do the same. I have seen many deaths. I am just a medical doctor who does social works and a scientist. Please keep me that way.
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.�
� Margaret Mead
“Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.�
� William Faulkner
“Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.�
� Harriet Tubman
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.�
� R. Buckminster Fuller
“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.�
� Nelson Mandela
“The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.
[These words are also inscribed upon his grave]�
� Karl Marx, Eleven Theses on Feuerbach
“[Life]It is what you make it. If you think you can't change the world, then go on and follow the path already carved out for you. But there are other roads to choose, they're just harder to trudge through. Changing the world is'nt easy, but I sure as hell am going to keep trying. Are you?�
� Simone Elkeles, Perfect Chemistry
“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.�
� Albert Einstein
“I don't want to live in the kind of world where we don't look out for each other. Not just the people that are close to us, but anybody who needs a helping hand. I cant change the way anybody else thinks, or what they choose to do, but I can do my bit.�
� Charles de Lint
Please support by clicking the 'Like' button below this blog.
The time is now. Or would you rather wait for everything to end? Your loved ones? Yourself?
I won't respond to religious questions and I suggest that everyone do the same. I have seen many deaths. I am just a medical doctor who does social works and a scientist. Please keep me that way.
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.�
� Margaret Mead
“Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.�
� William Faulkner
“Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.�
� Harriet Tubman
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.�
� R. Buckminster Fuller
“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.�
� Nelson Mandela
“The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.
[These words are also inscribed upon his grave]�
� Karl Marx, Eleven Theses on Feuerbach
“[Life]It is what you make it. If you think you can't change the world, then go on and follow the path already carved out for you. But there are other roads to choose, they're just harder to trudge through. Changing the world is'nt easy, but I sure as hell am going to keep trying. Are you?�
� Simone Elkeles, Perfect Chemistry
“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.�
� Albert Einstein
“I don't want to live in the kind of world where we don't look out for each other. Not just the people that are close to us, but anybody who needs a helping hand. I cant change the way anybody else thinks, or what they choose to do, but I can do my bit.�
� Charles de Lint
We are One Step Away from Utopia and that Step is Breaking Down Our Beliefs.
Human species took pride in their knowledge and among their first knowledge is what's good for them and what's bad for them. They had been so proud of this knowledge that some of them even believed that it was one of the two things that allowed them to become as one of God: the second thing is living forever, they said that God hid the tree of life in order for humans not to be able to become one of God. The truth is, there is no hiding anything and even though humans can live forever, they won't be able to become as one of God.
Now let's see where humans' pride has taken them: the conflicts, the killing, the concept of afterlife, the condemning, the folklores, the stories, the conspiracies, and the killing again, the judicial system, the bias, the justifications, the convictions, the musings, the worships, the conceptualizing God, the scriptures.
HUMANS PLAY GOD.
Some can say that this is due to God's absence and humans' curiosity makes them feel the need to fill the void. Humans need to fill it to explain the mysteries of life and consciousness, and success and failure.
There's actually no void. And instead of trying to fill it by assumptions that had cost us many lives (our heroes, our villains), I and many people decided to learn what is there and corrected the old views. What I found works better: /author_blog...
You can decide too:
1. To leave the past behind and start over.
2. To refuse to evolve and keep doing the same thing.
My choice is clear and I'm pursuing a research to store our memories.
/author_blog...
Absolutely no harm will come from 'no death and dearth' policy. We didn't know this policy in the past and look how much it had cost us, all the time and resources and lives. We should've done the researches a long time ago, instead of warring and saying there is an afterlife because we are very lazy and we find it easier to take our life and beloved beautiful Earth for granted which will be fatal. No time is better than now. The Earth is changing and Mars is getting closer.
Even the literature's 'Satans and Gods' will finally be at peace if they apply the 'no death and dearth' policy.
Because I wonder whether you think I said there's no God.
Because never once have I ever said that �. Please check all my posts. What I said was: you shouldn't conceptualize God. Study it instead.
I think I'm sure I never said there is no god except a few days ago, when I and my goodreads friends were discussing creationism/evolution. In fact, the first reviewers know that the original description of my book said 'There is a creator', but I had to erase it because apparently many people thought I was talking about creationism.
No God will object to PEACE ON EARTH, only presumptuous humans will.
If we put a tiger and a cat in one room with limited resources for a year, it is most likely that the cat will die first. The universe doesn't care for who is right or wrong. The universe lets both happen and the universe lets both end. A natural disaster claims all lives.
"THERE IS NO GOOD OR EVIL. THERE IS NO RIGHT OR WRONG. No matter who you are or what you are, you must never harm life and you must never spend resources! These are the ones that matter."
This works in all conflict scenarios:
Let's say someone hits your car, who is right and who is wrong then? Here, both of you should understand that it doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong, because according to the universe it doesn't matter. What matters is both your lives and the resources. You and the other driver should instead adhere to the policy "no death or dearth". If you adhere to this, no conflict will ensue because conflict will consume life and resources. Both individuals will come to an agreement that is acceptable as common purpose.
The Israelis and Palestinians should never care for who is right and who is wrong. They should instead take care of the thing that matters: life and resources.
This knowledge will also safeguard our lives and bring them toward the true heaven: where there is no death and dearth. Or would any of us prefer an oblivion type of paradise after death? If we lose the neurons, all these concepts of out-of-body experience, other dimensions, transcendental meditation, including all we can possibly think of as heaven will not be felt as something that exists, therefore lack of consciousness/neurons will cause all that to cease to matter. Any ideas of an afterlife, all the other concepts that have any slightest possibility of being true, ALL THE CONCEPTS THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY THINK OF OR SUBCONSCIOUSLY DREAM OF will cease to exist for us if we die. This isn't arguable. There is nothing anyone can say to defend the concept of afterlife, because beyond what we can possibly think of or subconsciously dream of is nothing.
I shared this with you so that if God were up there, He could say:
I gave them the universe, finally, the humans get it. They finally get what consciousness is for. The bacteria, dinosaurs, Homo erectus, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis didn't get it. Homo sapiens didn't get it before with their religious scriptures that they claimed to have heard from Me or from the other species before them, and their subjective, speculative nature and moral values that have harmed and killed many.
Now let's see where humans' pride has taken them: the conflicts, the killing, the concept of afterlife, the condemning, the folklores, the stories, the conspiracies, and the killing again, the judicial system, the bias, the justifications, the convictions, the musings, the worships, the conceptualizing God, the scriptures.
HUMANS PLAY GOD.
Some can say that this is due to God's absence and humans' curiosity makes them feel the need to fill the void. Humans need to fill it to explain the mysteries of life and consciousness, and success and failure.
There's actually no void. And instead of trying to fill it by assumptions that had cost us many lives (our heroes, our villains), I and many people decided to learn what is there and corrected the old views. What I found works better: /author_blog...
You can decide too:
1. To leave the past behind and start over.
2. To refuse to evolve and keep doing the same thing.
My choice is clear and I'm pursuing a research to store our memories.
/author_blog...
Absolutely no harm will come from 'no death and dearth' policy. We didn't know this policy in the past and look how much it had cost us, all the time and resources and lives. We should've done the researches a long time ago, instead of warring and saying there is an afterlife because we are very lazy and we find it easier to take our life and beloved beautiful Earth for granted which will be fatal. No time is better than now. The Earth is changing and Mars is getting closer.
Even the literature's 'Satans and Gods' will finally be at peace if they apply the 'no death and dearth' policy.
Because I wonder whether you think I said there's no God.
Because never once have I ever said that �. Please check all my posts. What I said was: you shouldn't conceptualize God. Study it instead.
I think I'm sure I never said there is no god except a few days ago, when I and my goodreads friends were discussing creationism/evolution. In fact, the first reviewers know that the original description of my book said 'There is a creator', but I had to erase it because apparently many people thought I was talking about creationism.
No God will object to PEACE ON EARTH, only presumptuous humans will.
If we put a tiger and a cat in one room with limited resources for a year, it is most likely that the cat will die first. The universe doesn't care for who is right or wrong. The universe lets both happen and the universe lets both end. A natural disaster claims all lives.
"THERE IS NO GOOD OR EVIL. THERE IS NO RIGHT OR WRONG. No matter who you are or what you are, you must never harm life and you must never spend resources! These are the ones that matter."
This works in all conflict scenarios:
Let's say someone hits your car, who is right and who is wrong then? Here, both of you should understand that it doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong, because according to the universe it doesn't matter. What matters is both your lives and the resources. You and the other driver should instead adhere to the policy "no death or dearth". If you adhere to this, no conflict will ensue because conflict will consume life and resources. Both individuals will come to an agreement that is acceptable as common purpose.
The Israelis and Palestinians should never care for who is right and who is wrong. They should instead take care of the thing that matters: life and resources.
This knowledge will also safeguard our lives and bring them toward the true heaven: where there is no death and dearth. Or would any of us prefer an oblivion type of paradise after death? If we lose the neurons, all these concepts of out-of-body experience, other dimensions, transcendental meditation, including all we can possibly think of as heaven will not be felt as something that exists, therefore lack of consciousness/neurons will cause all that to cease to matter. Any ideas of an afterlife, all the other concepts that have any slightest possibility of being true, ALL THE CONCEPTS THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY THINK OF OR SUBCONSCIOUSLY DREAM OF will cease to exist for us if we die. This isn't arguable. There is nothing anyone can say to defend the concept of afterlife, because beyond what we can possibly think of or subconsciously dream of is nothing.
I shared this with you so that if God were up there, He could say:
I gave them the universe, finally, the humans get it. They finally get what consciousness is for. The bacteria, dinosaurs, Homo erectus, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis didn't get it. Homo sapiens didn't get it before with their religious scriptures that they claimed to have heard from Me or from the other species before them, and their subjective, speculative nature and moral values that have harmed and killed many.
A nonfiction explanation about Genesis? Part 1 � The Future of Consciousness/The Future of Everything/Can We Finally Explain It?
I'm thinking about writing a second book which will describe the key points of my book, Genesis. I have had so many complaints from readers about its unclarities. I will start with blogs. I haven't known the best title for the first part. While reading this, you will find out the connections with the scenes in Genesis and why it is very important that all beings know this.
I will start by telling you the different concepts of God:
A. God is the benevolent leader. This God rules over all that occur so this God doesn't need to rule, or even lead. This God is in and beyond the universe. This God doesn't care for right or wrong. This God doesn't have a cause behind it. This entity is the cause behind all that have existed, exist, and will exist. This God can be:
1. Justice and this God sees to it that consciousness survives. According to this God, life and existence is important. This God provides afterlife after life ends. I don't know why this God can't create heaven in the first place and thus sparing us the mortality and the cruel universe which is the reason why we should work and evolve and not drink salt water or enter the outer space without a suit and save resources to survive.
2. Not justice and is only responsible for the creation of the universe and the occurrence of life. According to this God, life and existence is not important. This God doesn't have any role in our survival. This God provided 'the raw materials' for life and existence and let life and existence vanish.
B. God is not the benevolent leader. This God is in but not beyond the universe. This God's power is limited. There is limited seating in this God's heaven. Something happens beyond this God's power. We and this God have to work together. This God is either bound by time and reality that happens in sequence, or not bound by time but isn't capable of changing our reality very much. This God is bound by a law because this God's existence is not beyond the law. This God is not Justice itself, but instead this God urges that justice be done. This God serves a 'higher God' which is Justice (Justice is above this God). Suffice it to say that this God is like our government. Look to your left and right and up and down, you will see presidents, kings, queens, prime ministers, legislative councils, judicial councils, party leaders, CEOs, CFOs, COOs, managers, gang leaders, the leader in our families, executioners, the alphas in groups of animals. This God is like them. This God can be:
1. The strongest of us all, thus it is true that this God's power has a quantity. Its power is not beyond existence. So this God can be stronger than everything else combined. This God can demand something or everything. This God can rule. This God can demand order, worships, patience.
2. Weaker than the opposite force that is: evil, arbitrary, pro-chaos (order is love and life so this opposite force is pro-hate, pro-fear, pro-destruction), keen to destroy lives, pretty much the strongest version of the dark side. This God is afraid to go out. This God watches. I don't know what makes this God God, maybe this God isn't bound by time, maybe this God is like Professor Hawking � very smart but not very strong. This God has remarkable plans that will work out in the end: this God will win in the end.
Which God do you believe in? Pick one or combine them. Or make a new one. You may change the word 'God' with 'I' and see where 'I' is.
There is a reason why I mainly talk about Christianity because I know about it a lot, and I can say that the God in the Old Testament is B1, and the God in the New Testament is mainly A1 (sometimes combined with B1). In order not to alienate a single group, I'd like to write about other religions too: I guess that the God in the Quran and Torah is B1, the God(s) in Hinduism is (are) A1 and/or the combination of B1 and B2, the 'Gods' in Buddhism and natural religions are B2.
Some of the people might think that what I'm saying is not important. On the contrary, it is of the ultimate importance because it is very important for everything we know: love, tears, joy. Because what I told you about the nonexistence of good and evil has been shown to work eternally. Because this has been our past, this is our present, and this is our future. Because there is no harm in knowing all of it; there is harm in claiming that you know when the fact is that you haven't even tried. Because some of us still believe in these Gods, and there are people who believe in God A1 and A2 and still think that they have the RIGHT TO RULE others. Because some of us still believe in good and evil and are very proud to be good (or bad). Because almost all of us count on the concept of afterlife while this concept is doing nothing for our current survival, if anything, the concept of afterlife aggravates the destruction of our beautiful Earth and the destruction of life itself through greed and what I call first-order hedonism (self gratification: riches and laziness) and second-order hedonism (self destruction). Because by 'us' I mean Homo sapiens and not the other species who/which have been extinct or are still living. Because this is what happens in the present time:
PEOPLE, THE LESSER GODS (GOD B1&B2) AND THEIR DISCIPLES, THE DEVIL, DEMONS, AND ALL BEINGS IN ALL DIMENSIONS STILL THINK THAT THEY ARE RIGHT (GOOD) AND THE OTHERS ARE WRONG (EVIL).
Let's group these beings and give the group a name. Let's call them the A-holes, because they build a hole in the place where God A presides. These A-holes are lesser Gods that can have flaws, and they do have flaws, they don't know better and the systems that they try to establish will crumple.
You have read my book and my blogs. There is no good or evil as there is no right or wrong. I've been waiting for a counterargument for this. I'll just tell you: one can counter this with: Yes there is no right or wrong in the universe but consciousness (we, the devil, God B1 & B2 and their disciples, demons, all the beings in other space-time continuums) is able to distinguish right and wrong.
You are mistaken. Let me elaborate:
1. There is no free will. If you think that consciousness posits the existence of free will, and therefore the existence of right and wrong, you are mistaken. Two reasons (you actually only need one of these to prove that free will is nonexistent):
- Let's take a look at an animal, a wild dog, for instance. This dog reacts to a rabbit when it's hungry. It chases the rabbit and eats it. Over time, another rabbit develops abstract thinking, it can sense what is not there yet. The rabbit becomes attuned to its surrounding and develops the first form of abstract thinking which is foreknowledge, and it succeeds in not being eaten because of this. The dog also learns and develops abstract thinking, its abstract thinking is way more advanced than the rabbit's, it is the next form of abstract thinking, it is conceptual thinking. The dog doesn't react to its concrete thinking (hunger and the existence of the rabbit) instantly but instead the dog plans, it says to itself that it should refrain from attacking directly, it has learned that attacking directly (or succumbing to its primal instinct) will mean failure to eat and survive. And voila, using abstract thinking, the dog succeeds in eating the rabbit. Several years pass and human beings start to domesticate rabbits, and the dogs learn that if they kill the rabbit for food, the dogs will get slaughtered by the humans, and now the dogs develop the next form of abstract thinking which is self-restraint.
If any of you thinks that this abstract thinking is free will, you are totally mistaken. If any superior entity holds this against you and says that you have free will while it is clear that our survival is our own responsibility and there is no help whatsoever from above (species went extinct and we will too if we don't learn), then this superior entity is being unreasonable and we must at the very least not listen to them.
- The second one is the arrow of time. Time happens for a being when that being perceives nothingness as a sequence. Everything has direct and indirect causes and direct and indirect effects; nothing in existence can free itself from these. There is no 'will that is free'. If you choose to hurt something, one of the causes of your deed is the existence of that thing (you can blame it on that thing), and you will get the effect of your deed. If you choose to not hurt something, again one of the causes of your deed is the existence of that thing, and again you will get the effect of your deed.
2. This is how the universe is: there are infinite direct and indirect causes for something to happen. If you say that something is right, the universe can easily prove to you that that something is wrong, and vice versa. It is too easy for the universe to prove to you that the path you choose is the wrong one, or the right one, at the time the path is chosen. Two beings get into a fight and Being 1 claims that he is the right one and ends the life of Being 2; the entire species also think that Being 1 is right and support the decision to end Being 2. Now, after that, as fast as a lightning strike or as slowly as continental drift, the universe can easily make Being 1 the reason for the death of a whole clan of beings and prove that Being 1 was after all the wrong one. Why? Because there are infinite factors that can lead to a single event.
So, now we've established that: right and wrong is nonexistent, as much as good and evil is nonexistent.
Want another proof?
Let's go back to the group, which comprises us, the devil, the lesser Gods (God B1 & B2) and their disciples, demons, all the beings in other space-time continuums who still think that right (good) and wrong (evil) exist.
When this group formulates, builds, establishes any systems to define right or wrong (these systems can be ANY types of governments, punishment, hell, ethics, maxims, principles, relationships), the system will crumple.
***
So, what can we do if there is no right or wrong?
We can try to realize God A1's heaven. Let heaven come down to Earth. Let the true sovereignty of the true God rule over us. It's already clear in my past blog that the 'There is no right or wrong, there should be no death or dearth' will bring us toward Moral Excellence and Utopia and the Peace Forever.
Can we finally explain it?
Yes.
Do we finally have the key to secure peace?
Yes.
Can we defeat death?
Yes. The second part of the blogs will be about whether the benevolent God is A1 or A2, what consciousness is, and whether it is possible to make heaven on Earth (no death or dearth). I need research for this. Science will bring good news. Science, philosophy, and religion shouldn't be separate. They should be one.
I will give you a preview of the second part of the blogs. One of the things I will write is whether this sentence above "When this group formulates, builds, establishes any systems to define right or wrong (these systems can be ANY types of governments, punishment, hell, ethics, maxims, principles, relationships), the system will crumple." extends to the laws and theories in natural science (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geoscience).
It is very important that all beings know the first part of the blogs first, so I should refrain from publishing the second part of the blogs before all beings know the first one. Please help telling others by liking or posting a comment below.
I will start by telling you the different concepts of God:
A. God is the benevolent leader. This God rules over all that occur so this God doesn't need to rule, or even lead. This God is in and beyond the universe. This God doesn't care for right or wrong. This God doesn't have a cause behind it. This entity is the cause behind all that have existed, exist, and will exist. This God can be:
1. Justice and this God sees to it that consciousness survives. According to this God, life and existence is important. This God provides afterlife after life ends. I don't know why this God can't create heaven in the first place and thus sparing us the mortality and the cruel universe which is the reason why we should work and evolve and not drink salt water or enter the outer space without a suit and save resources to survive.
2. Not justice and is only responsible for the creation of the universe and the occurrence of life. According to this God, life and existence is not important. This God doesn't have any role in our survival. This God provided 'the raw materials' for life and existence and let life and existence vanish.
B. God is not the benevolent leader. This God is in but not beyond the universe. This God's power is limited. There is limited seating in this God's heaven. Something happens beyond this God's power. We and this God have to work together. This God is either bound by time and reality that happens in sequence, or not bound by time but isn't capable of changing our reality very much. This God is bound by a law because this God's existence is not beyond the law. This God is not Justice itself, but instead this God urges that justice be done. This God serves a 'higher God' which is Justice (Justice is above this God). Suffice it to say that this God is like our government. Look to your left and right and up and down, you will see presidents, kings, queens, prime ministers, legislative councils, judicial councils, party leaders, CEOs, CFOs, COOs, managers, gang leaders, the leader in our families, executioners, the alphas in groups of animals. This God is like them. This God can be:
1. The strongest of us all, thus it is true that this God's power has a quantity. Its power is not beyond existence. So this God can be stronger than everything else combined. This God can demand something or everything. This God can rule. This God can demand order, worships, patience.
2. Weaker than the opposite force that is: evil, arbitrary, pro-chaos (order is love and life so this opposite force is pro-hate, pro-fear, pro-destruction), keen to destroy lives, pretty much the strongest version of the dark side. This God is afraid to go out. This God watches. I don't know what makes this God God, maybe this God isn't bound by time, maybe this God is like Professor Hawking � very smart but not very strong. This God has remarkable plans that will work out in the end: this God will win in the end.
Which God do you believe in? Pick one or combine them. Or make a new one. You may change the word 'God' with 'I' and see where 'I' is.
There is a reason why I mainly talk about Christianity because I know about it a lot, and I can say that the God in the Old Testament is B1, and the God in the New Testament is mainly A1 (sometimes combined with B1). In order not to alienate a single group, I'd like to write about other religions too: I guess that the God in the Quran and Torah is B1, the God(s) in Hinduism is (are) A1 and/or the combination of B1 and B2, the 'Gods' in Buddhism and natural religions are B2.
Some of the people might think that what I'm saying is not important. On the contrary, it is of the ultimate importance because it is very important for everything we know: love, tears, joy. Because what I told you about the nonexistence of good and evil has been shown to work eternally. Because this has been our past, this is our present, and this is our future. Because there is no harm in knowing all of it; there is harm in claiming that you know when the fact is that you haven't even tried. Because some of us still believe in these Gods, and there are people who believe in God A1 and A2 and still think that they have the RIGHT TO RULE others. Because some of us still believe in good and evil and are very proud to be good (or bad). Because almost all of us count on the concept of afterlife while this concept is doing nothing for our current survival, if anything, the concept of afterlife aggravates the destruction of our beautiful Earth and the destruction of life itself through greed and what I call first-order hedonism (self gratification: riches and laziness) and second-order hedonism (self destruction). Because by 'us' I mean Homo sapiens and not the other species who/which have been extinct or are still living. Because this is what happens in the present time:
PEOPLE, THE LESSER GODS (GOD B1&B2) AND THEIR DISCIPLES, THE DEVIL, DEMONS, AND ALL BEINGS IN ALL DIMENSIONS STILL THINK THAT THEY ARE RIGHT (GOOD) AND THE OTHERS ARE WRONG (EVIL).
Let's group these beings and give the group a name. Let's call them the A-holes, because they build a hole in the place where God A presides. These A-holes are lesser Gods that can have flaws, and they do have flaws, they don't know better and the systems that they try to establish will crumple.
You have read my book and my blogs. There is no good or evil as there is no right or wrong. I've been waiting for a counterargument for this. I'll just tell you: one can counter this with: Yes there is no right or wrong in the universe but consciousness (we, the devil, God B1 & B2 and their disciples, demons, all the beings in other space-time continuums) is able to distinguish right and wrong.
You are mistaken. Let me elaborate:
1. There is no free will. If you think that consciousness posits the existence of free will, and therefore the existence of right and wrong, you are mistaken. Two reasons (you actually only need one of these to prove that free will is nonexistent):
- Let's take a look at an animal, a wild dog, for instance. This dog reacts to a rabbit when it's hungry. It chases the rabbit and eats it. Over time, another rabbit develops abstract thinking, it can sense what is not there yet. The rabbit becomes attuned to its surrounding and develops the first form of abstract thinking which is foreknowledge, and it succeeds in not being eaten because of this. The dog also learns and develops abstract thinking, its abstract thinking is way more advanced than the rabbit's, it is the next form of abstract thinking, it is conceptual thinking. The dog doesn't react to its concrete thinking (hunger and the existence of the rabbit) instantly but instead the dog plans, it says to itself that it should refrain from attacking directly, it has learned that attacking directly (or succumbing to its primal instinct) will mean failure to eat and survive. And voila, using abstract thinking, the dog succeeds in eating the rabbit. Several years pass and human beings start to domesticate rabbits, and the dogs learn that if they kill the rabbit for food, the dogs will get slaughtered by the humans, and now the dogs develop the next form of abstract thinking which is self-restraint.
If any of you thinks that this abstract thinking is free will, you are totally mistaken. If any superior entity holds this against you and says that you have free will while it is clear that our survival is our own responsibility and there is no help whatsoever from above (species went extinct and we will too if we don't learn), then this superior entity is being unreasonable and we must at the very least not listen to them.
- The second one is the arrow of time. Time happens for a being when that being perceives nothingness as a sequence. Everything has direct and indirect causes and direct and indirect effects; nothing in existence can free itself from these. There is no 'will that is free'. If you choose to hurt something, one of the causes of your deed is the existence of that thing (you can blame it on that thing), and you will get the effect of your deed. If you choose to not hurt something, again one of the causes of your deed is the existence of that thing, and again you will get the effect of your deed.
2. This is how the universe is: there are infinite direct and indirect causes for something to happen. If you say that something is right, the universe can easily prove to you that that something is wrong, and vice versa. It is too easy for the universe to prove to you that the path you choose is the wrong one, or the right one, at the time the path is chosen. Two beings get into a fight and Being 1 claims that he is the right one and ends the life of Being 2; the entire species also think that Being 1 is right and support the decision to end Being 2. Now, after that, as fast as a lightning strike or as slowly as continental drift, the universe can easily make Being 1 the reason for the death of a whole clan of beings and prove that Being 1 was after all the wrong one. Why? Because there are infinite factors that can lead to a single event.
So, now we've established that: right and wrong is nonexistent, as much as good and evil is nonexistent.
Want another proof?
Let's go back to the group, which comprises us, the devil, the lesser Gods (God B1 & B2) and their disciples, demons, all the beings in other space-time continuums who still think that right (good) and wrong (evil) exist.
When this group formulates, builds, establishes any systems to define right or wrong (these systems can be ANY types of governments, punishment, hell, ethics, maxims, principles, relationships), the system will crumple.
***
So, what can we do if there is no right or wrong?
We can try to realize God A1's heaven. Let heaven come down to Earth. Let the true sovereignty of the true God rule over us. It's already clear in my past blog that the 'There is no right or wrong, there should be no death or dearth' will bring us toward Moral Excellence and Utopia and the Peace Forever.
Can we finally explain it?
Yes.
Do we finally have the key to secure peace?
Yes.
Can we defeat death?
Yes. The second part of the blogs will be about whether the benevolent God is A1 or A2, what consciousness is, and whether it is possible to make heaven on Earth (no death or dearth). I need research for this. Science will bring good news. Science, philosophy, and religion shouldn't be separate. They should be one.
I will give you a preview of the second part of the blogs. One of the things I will write is whether this sentence above "When this group formulates, builds, establishes any systems to define right or wrong (these systems can be ANY types of governments, punishment, hell, ethics, maxims, principles, relationships), the system will crumple." extends to the laws and theories in natural science (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geoscience).
It is very important that all beings know the first part of the blogs first, so I should refrain from publishing the second part of the blogs before all beings know the first one. Please help telling others by liking or posting a comment below.
