Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Humanity is facing a multitude of problems that threaten its survival and well-being. These prevailing social issues are practices that have been inherited and replicated from antiquity, such as the buy and sell, you work I pay, the conquer and rule, the torture and execution, war, slavery, genocide, apartheid, atrocity and other various social predicaments that are still around in these modern days. We all know these practices are barbaric. These social ideas have potentially harmed innocent children, unaware civilians, and the environment. These social ideological beliefs must be eradicated forever once and for all. In this paper, I propose a radical solution to the problems that have plagued humanity for centuries. I present a vision for a new social system that can organize humanity in a sustainable and joyful way. I introduce the Greensphere Project, a social system that consists of four main components: The Farm, The Superstation, The Smart Condominium, and The Global Network. I explain how each component serves a specific function and contributes to the overall well-being of humanity. I claim that the Greensphere Project can create a world where everyone has enough, everyone is happy, and everyone is free. The Greensphere Project is not a fanciful utopia, but a feasible opportunity. It is not a far-off hope, but a near-term reality. It is not a drastic upheaval, but a gradual progression. It is the next step for humanity; it is the next stage of civilization; it is the way to live.

We know that the Sumerian civilization, the Egyptian dynasty, the Indus Valley, the Babylonian Empire, the Roman Empire, the Ming Dynasty, the Russian Empire, and the declining American Empire, all borrowed and copied ideas from other cultures of their past. Most of these empires, bound by their diverse political, cultural, geographical, and social powers, once rose, and then vanished without a trace. The social practices of their government, which were acquired over and over from the past, led them to extinction. If humans continue to adhere to the same social ideology of classical antiquity, modern humans will face the same fate of extinction. However, extinction can be prevented. There are alternative ways. There are innovative solutions. It is embodied and envisioned in a social system known as The Greensphere Project, which I sometimes playfully call Operation Humankindness.

The Greensphere Project is based on the principles of equality, cooperation, and abundance. It can change the course of humanity to a much better life. It can alter our social behaviors to a fresh new concept. It can apply the lessons that we learned from the pandemic to change the way we treat ourselves and Mother Nature. It consists of four main components: The Farm, The Superstation, The Smart Condominium, and The Global Network. Each component serves a specific function and contributes to the overall well-being of humanity.

The Farm is the source of all the basic needs of life, such as food, water, energy, and minerals. It is managed by the people for the people, using advanced technology and automation. Everyone works on the farm for three days a week, and enjoys the rest of the week for leisure and personal pursuits. The farm produces enough goods and services for everyone, and distributes them freely and equally through the global network.

The Superstation is the backbone of the transportation system, connecting all the satellite communities around the world. It houses hundreds of thousands of superconductive electromagnetic trains. The superstation allows people to travel anywhere they want, anytime they want, for free. It also serves as a hub for communication, entertainment, and education.

The Smart Condominium is the home of every person, located half a mile away from the superstation. It is a glass-tinted solar-powered building, equipped with all the modern amenities and comforts. It is also pre-fabricated and built by the people for the people, using eco-friendly materials and designs. The smart condominium adapts to the preferences and needs of each person, and provides them with a personalized and comfortable living space. It is also accessible by compact electrical cars, aerodynamic bikes, automatic walkways, and the traditional way of commuting - walking.

The Global Network is made up of satellite communities worldwide. Every country, state, and city around the world is identically set up with the same blueprint of a satellite community. Every satellite community is a tourist destination; a haven of passion and leisure. It is a system of cooperation and collaboration among all the people of the world. It is based on a new social value system that emphasizes abundance, generosity, and kindness, instead of scarcity, greed, and violence. It fosters a global culture of empathy, compassion, and understanding, instead of hatred, fear, and ignorance. It respects and celebrates the diversity of cultures, beliefs, and identities, instead of imposing one’s own views and values on others. It eliminates the concept of money and selling, and replaces it with sharing and giving. It eliminates the root causes of wars, crimes, and violence, and creates a world where everyone lives in peace, harmony, and cooperation.

The Greensphere Project is not a utopian fantasy, but a realistic possibility. It is not a distant dream, but a future reality. It is not a radical revolution, but a natural evolution. It should be the way to live.

To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the Greensphere Project, I propose a research design that involves the following steps:

Selection of participants. A random sample of 10,000 people from different countries, cultures, and backgrounds will be invited to join the Greensphere Project. They will be informed about the nature and purpose of the project. They will also be briefed of the risks and benefits of participating, and their right to withdraw at any time.
Construction of the Greensphere. A suitable location will be chosen for the construction of the Greensphere, which will consist of the farm, a superstation, and 1000 smart condominiums. The construction will be done by a team of engineers, architects, and technicians, using eco-friendly and renewable materials. The Greensphere will be designed to be self-sufficient, resilient, and adaptable to changing environmental conditions.

Implementation of the Greensphere Project. The participants will be transported to the Greensphere, and will be given a brief orientation on how to live and work in the new social system. They will be expected to follow the rules and norms of the Greensphere Project, such as working on the farm for three days a week and participating in the global network for collaboration. They will also be encouraged to pursue their personal interests, hobbies, and passions.

Monitoring and evaluation of the Greensphere Project. The participants will be monitored and evaluated for a period of one year, using various methods and measures. The methods will include surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations, and experiments. The measures will include indicators of well-being, happiness, health, productivity, creativity, cooperation, and harmony. The data will be collected, analyzed, and reported by a team of researchers, who will also provide feedback and support to the participants. The results will be compared with those of a control group, who will live in a conventional social system.

Conclusion and recommendation of the Greensphere Project. Based on the findings of the monitoring and evaluation, a conclusion will be drawn on whether the Greensphere Project is a viable and desirable social system for humanity. A recommendation will be made on whether the Greensphere Project should be scaled up, modified, or abandoned. The implications and limitations of the research will also be discussed, and suggestions for future research will be provided.

The Greensphere Project is a very ambitious and innovative proposal for a new social system that aims to solve the problems of humanity and the environment. However, it also faces some potential challenges that need to be addressed and overcome. One of these challenges is Social challenges. The Greensphere Project requires a radical change in the social values and norms of the people. It eliminates the concept of money and selling, and replaces it with sharing and giving. It also respects and celebrates the diversity of cultures, beliefs, and identities, instead of imposing one’s own views and values on others. However, this also means that the project faces the challenge of convincing and motivating the people to adopt and embrace the new social system, and to overcome the resistance and opposition from those who benefit from the current system or who are attached to their old habits and traditions.

Comments:
The complete version of this article can be found in the book Originemology by Joey Lawsin.

A whistle may seem to be an innocent object just lying on its own space. It doesn't move. It doesn't have a brain. It doesn't do anything. However, amazingly, although brainless, it actually contains pieces of information. It can store and retrieve information. And as a sensor, it has awareness too since it can detect signals appropriate for it to function. It is logically intuitive as well since it has the capacity to turn on or off. Because of its behaviors to match the right signal to turn on or off, it is conscious as well. However, it is not living yet because it can't produce its own likeness, and it doesn't have life yet because it can't recognize itself. It is not alive as well because it doesn't consume yet its own energy.

The last three criteria seem impossible, but according to the seven Laws of Inscription, the whistle can undergo transformation and become alive, living, and with life just like humans, when information from the outside world is acquired by choice or by chance.

By following the new seven evolutionary orders of life, the Seven Inscriptions, proposed by Joey Lawsin in his book Autognorics, a whistle can become alive when it has a sensor able to trigger its structural algorithm inscripted to consume energy of its own. It can become living if it has a sensor that can trigger its series of logic which can produce its own likeness. It can have life if it has a sensor that can trigger the inscriptions on its design able to recognize its inner self (selfness).

Being alive, living, and with life are three different terms that are usually interchanged and confused. Because of these confusions in terminology, Lawsin used the word Bioform to represent an entity or system that is alive, living, and with life, collectively. An entity is alive if it consumes energy to power itself. An entity is considered living if it is alive. And an entity has life if it is both alive and living. Humans and autognorics are examples of bioforms.

On the other hand, Abioform, a term coined by Lawsin in his book The Biotronics Project, is an entity or system that is alive and living but without life (self-realization). Abioforms are entities that are alive or living but have no capability of recognizing themselves. Plants and animals, according to some studies, can't recognize themselves and thus they don't possess self-realization. They are not self-conscious. Plants and animals are examples of abioforms.

A seed is another example of Abioform. A seed is a tiny object that is brainless as well. However, like all objects, it also contains embedded inscriptions or sets of instructions. The instructions dictate how it will grow into a plant. These include details like what kind of plant it will become, how tall it will grow, what kind of leaves it will have, and so on. It is believed that these instructions are encoded in the seed’s DNA, which act as a blueprint for its growth and development. The seed, without any conscious effort, carries within it all the information needed to become a fully grown plant.

However, the idea about the DNA is not a mutual example of “Inscription� as formulated by Joey Lawsin. This is not the essence of Lawsin’s concept on “Inscription by Design�. Inscription is a structural algorithm totally different from a DNA's computer-like program. It is also based on the Single Theory of Everything.


*inscriptioned = structural algorithm
*programmed = computer algorithm


"LIFE is a natural Right that should not be taken away by anyone no matter what, who, where, why, or how!" ~ Joey Lawsin

Joey Lawsin *Inscriptionist : is a person who is deeply passionate about discovering or seeking all the natural laws of the universe. These individuals are driven by the desire to uncover the beauty and elegance of formulas, equations, and natural laws hidden in every nook and cranny of the cosmos while decoding the fundamental dogma of existence or life, often referred to as the Single Theory of Everything.

In this article, the Brein Theory, technically known as the Paradigm Shift from Neural To Aneural ( A Brain without The Brain), Joey Lawsin argues that intelligence, behaviors, perceptions, awareness, consciousness, and other related mental interims can be processed without the need of the brain.

His claims are built upon the concepts of Inscription by Design and Generated Interim Emergence. The former deals with Intuitive Systems, Embedded Inscriptions, and Generated Interims while the latter deals with the new seven evolutionary criteria of life namely: (i) Mechanical Aliveness, (ii) Sensoric Awareness, (iii) Logical Intuitiveness, (iv) Aneural Consciousness, (v) Information Inlearness, (vi) Symbiotic Living, and (vii) Self-Emergence.

From his independent experiments and seminal findings on autognorics, biotronics, animals, plants, molds, and machines' intuitive anueral networks, Lawsin uncovered that a network of logics produces intelligence, sequential inscriptions give rise to behavioral experiences, cognition does not need to emanate from the brain, and mother nature, that includes all living things, is an external brain which is part of the internal brain. He also discovered that an intuitive anueral network can be lateral or open like a memory circuit board and can evolve into spherical or close like the human brain.

The Lawsinian paradox, also known as the Codexation Dilemma, is a concept introduced by Joey Lawsin in 1988. It revolves around the idea that humans cannot think of something without associating their thoughts with something else that is naturally inherent physically. This paradox is part of a broader study called the Originemology, which explores the nature of consciousness based on Lawsin's dictum "If I can match x with y, then I'm conscious" and information acquisition by choice or by chance.

The Codexation Dilemma suggests that our thoughts are always linked to physical entities or experiences, making it challenging to think of something entirely abstract or disconnected from our physical reality. This idea has implications for understanding consciousness, cognition, and the limitations of human thought.

Zero and One are abstract ideas. They don't exist as tangible, physical objects. These concepts only come to life in our minds through assumptions. In mathematics, these ideas are known as numerals. When we represent Zero with the symbol "0" and One with the symbol "1," we turn these abstract concepts into numbers through association. Numbers act as the physical stand-ins for these abstract numerals. Once we give these symbols form, they exist outside of our minds in the physical world. This practice of turning ideas into physical symbols is part of what Lawsin called the Information Codexation.

If we can bring the abstract concepts of Zero and One into the physical realm through definition, association, and symbolic representation, does this make them truly real in a physical sense? If we write "0" and "1" on paper, do they become real, physical entities? Does their appearance on paper prove their existence? If the abstract ideas of Zero and One become tangible through writing, how do we verify that this physical evidence is true, valid, or even real? Are these numbers now real objects existing in the physical world, or do they remain abstract ideas, imagined in our minds?

Here are other examples that explore the concept of abstract ideas becoming physical representations:

Imagine the concept of infinity. Infinity is an abstract idea that represents something without any bounds or limits. It doesn't exist as a physical object we can touch or see. However, in mathematics, we represent infinity with the symbol "�". By using this symbol, we give a physical form to the abstract idea of infinity.

Now, if we write "�" on a piece of paper, we are giving the abstract idea a material representation. Does this mean that infinity now exists physically? Is the symbol on the paper proof of infinity's existence? The symbol "�" serves as a way to communicate and understand the concept of infinity, but it doesn't make the abstract idea a physical object. Infinity remains an idea that exists in our minds, even though we use a symbol to represent it in the physical world.

When we think about abstract concepts like love, justice, or freedom, we often use metaphors and analogies that are rooted in physical experiences. For example, we might say "love is a journey" or "justice is blind." These expressions show how our thoughts are tied to physical experiences and entities.

In mathematics, we often use visual aids like graphs and geometric shapes to understand abstract concepts. Even though mathematical ideas can exist independently of physical objects, we rely on visual representations to grasp them.

Artists often use physical mediums like paint, sculpture, or digital tools to express abstract emotions and ideas. The physical artwork becomes a representation of the artist's inner thoughts and feelings, demonstrating the connection between abstract thought and physical expression.

Our memories are often triggered by sensory experiences like smells, sounds, or sights. For example, the smell of freshly baked cookies might remind you of your childhood home. This shows how our thoughts and memories are linked to physical sensations.

These examples illustrate how the Lawsinian paradox manifests in various aspects of our lives, highlighting how we often use labels, tags, symbols and representations to give form to abstract ideas, but it doesn't necessarily mean that these ideas become physically real. They remain abstract concepts that we use to understand and communicate complex ideas.

Defining and Measuring Consciousness: The Codexation Dilemma and its Seven Interpretations

Consciousness, an intricate and multifaceted phenomenon, has been the subject of investigation across scientific, philosophical, and artificial intelligence domains. However, a unified approach of defining, measuring, and explaining consciousness remains elusive. In this paper, we propose a new framework anchored on Information Codexation (IC) through the Codexation Dilemma (CD), a pivotal concept central for understanding consciousness. The dilemma asserts that “No man can think of something without associating his thought with something physical or material�.

Lawsin (1988) originally introduced this catchphrase as a means to integrate the scientific, philosophical, and technological aspects of consciousness in his Autognorics, the science of engineered life forms (ELFS). The dilemma facilitates the derivations of seven core interpretations of consciousness, each with its own definition, features, and correlates. These interpretations are:
(1) Associative or Correlative Consciousness, which is the ability to match or pair things;
(2) Equational or Relational Consciousness, which is the ability to be aware of oneself and one’s surroundings;
(3) Inlearned Consciousness, which is the ability to exhibit copied behaviors or traits;
(4) Scripted Consciousness, which is generated through a sequence of instructions;
(5) Codified Consciousness, which is the ability to transform physicals and abstracts;
(6) Generated Consciousness, which is an interim emergent of materials and instructions; and
(7) Evolutionary Consciousness, which is based on the seven Laws of Inscription.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows. First, we explain the Codexation Dilemma and its crucial role in defining and measuring consciousness. Then, we present the seven core interpretations of consciousness and their neural and aneural (non-neural) correlates. Next, we discuss the methods and limitations of our framework, and we compare it with other existing approaches. Finally, we conclude with some remarks and suggestions to generate new hypotheses and experiments for future research in making a thinking, living, conscious machine.

Consciousness is one of the most intriguing and elusive phenomena in science, philosophy, and technology. It is commonly defined as the subjective experience of being aware of oneself and one’s surroundings, and it is often associated with higher cognitive functions, such as memory, reasoning, language, and creativity. However, there is no clear and agreed-upon definition of what consciousness is, how it arises, and how it relates to neurons. Different disciplines and paradigms have proposed different theories and models of consciousness, based on various assumptions, methods, and criteria. Some of these theories focus on the neural correlates of consciousness, that is, the specific brain regions, networks, or processes that are necessary or sufficient for conscious experience. Other theories emphasize the non-neural correlates of consciousness, such as the behavioral, physiological, or environmental factors that modulate or influence conscious experience. However, these theories often face conceptual, perceptional, methodological, or empirical problems, such as the explanatory gap, the measurement problem, the binding problem, or the problem of other minds. Moreover, these theories often fail to account for the diversity and complexity of conscious phenomena, such as the different levels, modes, states, and contents of consciousness, and the different types and degrees of consciousness that may exist in different organisms, systems, or in vivo machines.

A new framework for understanding consciousness is conveyed here based primarily on Codexation Dilemma that explores the transformations of information from ideas to realities, from abstracts to physicals, or from the self's inner subjective mind to nature's outer objective world. The trans-codexation or transcodification of information is known as Information Codexation and the enigmatic transcodification from Abstracts to Physicals or vis-a-vis is known as the Codexation Dilemma (Lawsin, 1988). This paper presents the various interpretations of consciousness all anchored on codexation dilemma:

1. Associative or Correlative Consciousness (AC): Consciousness is the ability to establish one-to-one correspondences between different entities or phenomena. This includes various forms of association, such as:
1.1 Mimicry or imitation
1.2. Matching or pairing
1.3. Discovery or invention
1.4. Learning or acquisition
1.5. Parroting or emulation

AC is the most basic and universal form of consciousness, which does not require the involvement of the mind. It can be observed in the behavior of infants, animals, plants, and even microorganisms, who can acquire information through sensory inputs and respond accordingly. For example, infants can stack lego bricks without knowing the concepts of stacking, lego, height, or shape. Birds can associate nests with offspring, worms with food, and flying with predators by copying their parents. Plants, corals, and microbes can interact with their environment based on their innate or acquired associations. AC is also known as Aneural Associative Consciousness, as it does not depend on the presence of a nervous system, neurons, or the brain (Definition-1, Lawsin 1988)..

2. Equational or Relational Consciousness (RC): Consciousness is the result of a logical equation between two variables: X and Y. X represents the self, and Y represents the other being or the environment. If X is conscious with Y, then X is conscious. If X is alone by itself, then X will never become conscious.

RC is a more advanced form of consciousness, which requires the awareness of one's sensors and its interaction with the right signal. It is based on the premise that consciousness is a relational phenomenon, rather than an intrinsic property. RC challenges the common assumption that consciousness is equivalent to thinking, as expressed by the famous quote “I think, therefore I am� by Rene Descartes. This assumption ignores the fact that there are beings without brains that are conscious, and beings with brains that are not conscious. For example, children and infants are not conscious or self-conscious until a certain age. Thus, to rewrite Rene’s quote measured according to Lawsin Dictum: “If I can match X with Y, therefore, I am conscious.� (Definition-2, Lawsin 1988).

3. Inlearned Consciousness (IC): Consciousness is related to the inlearned behaviors or traits of the organism. Inlearned behaviors are those that are learned or acquired by choice or by chance through copying or discovering. Some measures of inlearned behaviors that indicate consciousness are:
3.1. Reproduction or procreation
3.2. Habitation or sheltering
3.3. Dormancy or sleeping
3.4. Recognition or identification
3.5. Defense or protection
3.6. Copulation or mating

IC is a form of consciousness that reflects the biological and evolutionary aspects of the organism. It is based on the observation that all conscious beings exhibit some or all of these inlearned behaviors, which are essential for their survival and adaptation. IC is also known as the Collaborative Determinants of Consciousness (Definition-3, Lawsin 1988).

4. Scriptive Consciousness (SC): Consciousness is an inscripted process that follows an orderly sequence of steps:
4.1. Information is transcodified into physical forms (codification);
4.2. Physical forms are transformed into actions or movements (activation);
4.3. Actions or movements are transferred into mechanical, repetitive, or animated behaviors (automation); and
4.4. Animated behaviors are translated into the persona or identity of the being (personification).

SC is a form of consciousness that describes the dynamic and complex nature of the phenomenon. It is based on the idea that consciousness is not a static or fixed state, but a continuous and adaptive process that involves multiple levels of information processing, codexation, and inscription. SC is also known as the Grand Script of Consciousness (Definition-4, Lawsin 1988).

5. Codified Consciousness (CC): Consciousness is a two-in-one process that involves physical and abstract components. It is classified into two types: neural and aneural, and categorized depending on the type of input and output involved: (i) Physical to Physical (P2P): Consciousness is the ability to detect and manipulate physical objects or phenomena. (ii) Physical to Abstract (P2A): Consciousness is the ability to abstract and conceptualize physical objects or phenomena. (iii) Abstract to Physical (A2P): Consciousness is the ability to materialize and instantiate abstract concepts or ideas. (iv) Abstract to Abstract (A2A): Consciousness is the ability to transform abstract concepts or ideas.

CC is a form of consciousness that involves a process of codification or associative codexation, which is the ability to establish correspondences, from realities to ideas, from physical to abstract. CC covers various forms and measures of codification, such as:

Dreaming or imagining: This is an example of A2A codification, where an idea is codified with another idea. Inventing or creating: This is an example of A2P or P2A codification, where an idea is codified with an object or vice versa. Playing or experimenting: This is an example of P2P codification, where an object is codified with another object. Dreams, inventions, and play are computational or quantitative measures of codified consciousness.

Consciousness is the ability of an organism to translate physical objects to abstract ideas. CC is the process where the physicals (outside the mind) are transcodified into abstracts (inside the mind) or vis-a-vis. CC is the basis of consciousness, as it enables the organism to acquire and process information from the external world. The process of pairing physicals and abstracts is known as Codification or Codexation. Codexation is the primary indicator of consciousness (Definition-5, Lawsin 1988).

6. Interim or Generated Consciousness (GC): Consciousness is the product of an inherent interim emergent system that consists of two parts: Materials and Instructions. Materials are things that have mass, such as apples, rocks, air, water, and fire. By-materials are things that are generated by materials, such as temperature, pressure, gravity, density, energy, and inscription. By-materials are invisible parameters that influence the behavior of materials. Both materials and by-materials are called Physicals. Non-material elements are called Abstracts.

GC is a form of consciousness that is based on the idea that consciousness depends on the existence of materials and information/instructions, which are the sources of codification. Consciousness arises from the interaction and evolution of intuitive materials, embedded instructions, and the single theory, which form a complex and dynamic system of individual behaviors and intelligence. Instruction is the intelligence that programs all creation and sequential instructions give rise to logic and behaviors. On the other hand, the Single Theory of Everything, also known as the Generated Interim Emergence, is a paradoxical concept that claims “Everything exists due to the fact that other things cause it to exist, otherwise, it exists and doesn't exist at all� (Definition-6, Lawsin 1988).

7. Evolutionary Consciousness (EC): Consciousness evolves when one is alive, aware, and intuitive. This new concept is based on the Law of Seven Inscriptions and the paradigm shift from neural to aneural intuitive memory network. It reflects the evolutionary stages and emergence aspects of the phenomenon.

It addresses the seven non-biological criteria of life, six to be living, four to be conscious, two to be aware, and one to be alive, such as:
a) Mechanical Aliveness: This is the stage where energy is continuously self obtained externally.
b) Sensorial Awareness: This is the stage where input signal is captured through the mechanical senses, such as sight, hearing, touch, smell, and taste.
c) Logical Intuitiveness: This is the stage where external signals activate the inherent information embedded in the structural design of the object.
d) Aneural Consciousness: This is the stage where information is codified from realities to ideas following the “A Brain without The Brain�, a paradigm shift from Neural to Aneural Memory.

EC is a form of consciousness that explains the physical and instructional aspects of the phenomenon. It is based on the non-mental ability (a brain without a brain) to store information by an object through Intelligence by Design or Inscription by Design (ID). EC is also known as the Seven Laws of Inscription (Definition-7, Lawsin 1988).

On the other hand, many of us think that being Alive, with Life, and Living are all one and the same. But according to Lawsin, the author of the Biotronics Project and who develops Autognorics, all of them are different and must have their distinct meanings. His thesis on these subjects rewrites the meanings of being Alive, Aware, Conscious, Intuitive, Informed, living, and with life based on a theory known as the Law of Seven Inscriptions of Life. They are redefined because humans' interpretations of the meaning of life are all wrong.

Before we go deeper into this new mindset of the Law of Seven Inscriptions, including bioforms and abioforms, let us first study the origin, creation, and evolution of early information based on the theory of Originemology, specifically its three most important seminal theories- the Caveman in the Box Trilogy, the Human Mental Handicap, and the Interim Emergence. Studying these concepts will properly correct the inherently flawed ideas we learned from the Theory of Mind.

In his thought and observable experiments, the Caveman in the Box Trilogy, Lawsin examines consciousness by investigating the origin, creation, and evolution of information scientifically with the following leading questions
1. How did information emerge into the early minds of the very first humans?
2. Who supplied our primitive ancestors with information?
3. Where did it originate? Where did it come from?
4. Was the source of information a who or a what? Was it god, space aliens, or something else?
5. If a bat was also placed inside the box, would it develop consciousness?

Lawsin also claims that consciousness can be defined based on his Human Mental Handicap Argument or the Codexation Dilemma that asserts " No human can think of something without associating his thought with something physical." The other thing refers to an object, a word, a label, a name, a definition, a symbol, a gesture, or a representation. In other words, Lawsin claims that consciousness can be simplified by: "If I can label x with y, therefore, I am conscious." He also claims that consciousness doesn't need to emanate from the brain. This theory on Aneural Associative Consciousness is based on Autognorics, the science of creating living machines, objects, or systems.

Based on Lawsin Non-Biological Criteria of Life, Life is an evolutionary process that starts from being alive to being living to having Life. The Inscriptions follow a sequence of seven orders or stages:
1. mechanization of Aliveness,
2. sensation of Awareness,
3. codification of Consciousness,
4. logic of Intuitiveness,
5. inscripted inlearning
6. experience of livingness,
7. emergence of Self.

Lawsin also posits that consciousness, including life, thoughts, emotions, animations, music, colors, senses are products of generated emergence. Generated Emergence is a theory that asserts everything emerges due to intuitive objects and embedded inscriptions. These intuitive objects may be intuitive networks, intuitive machines, intuitive states, intuitive forms, intuitive materials, and intuitive systems. They are technically called Interims or latent emergent. We sense or perceive them as if they are there but they are not. They seem to exist but they don't exist at all. They are by-materials created by materials.

"If I can match X with Y, then I am conscious" ~ Joey Lawsin

According to science, humans are made up of genes. Embedded in these genes are codes or instructions that have the capability to build the whole physical body. This set of instructions is the procedure programmed to create the necessary parts of the human body like the bones, muscles, organs, cells, and other elements for growth and development. This set of instructions is also programmed to bring down (put an end) the body to its demise.

In the real world, the physical human body only lasts on an average of 80 years*. This means our bodies are growing until we reach 40 and gradually dying as we reach 80 yrs old.

This can be shown by using a bell curve diagram. With the bell, the birth, pinnacle, and death of the physical body can be demonstrated. The left side of the bell is the ascending curve, the growing process. On the right side is the descending curve, the dying process. In between these two curves is the highest point called the peak. The peak is the genetic instruction that signals the body to stop growing and commence the dying process.

On average, statistically, the first part of human life starts from 1 to 40 years. Then, it stabilizes from 40 to 60 years. And finally, life declines from 60 to 80 years. Life, as shown, has three stages. The first stage (1-40) is the birth of life, the prime of our life. The second stage (40-60) is the highest ground of life, the plateau of our life. And the final stage (60-80) is the death of the body, the retirement of our life.

In comparison, a 3 ladder system is another good example that showcases the 3 stages of life. The first stage is called information acquisition or gathering. This is represented by a vertical ladder. This ladder is the time we open our eyes and say hello to the world. This is the stage we spend our lives without problems. The time where we just eat, play, and sleep. As we climb the ladder step by step upward, we begin to learn things from our parents, schools, and friends. And as we reach the top of the ladder, all the tools we need to live and survive are all now provided. The second stage is called the information utilization. This is represented by a horizontal ladder. This is the flat ladder where we start a family, have children, pursue our career, dream houses, and cars, travel around the world, and enjoy all the luxuries of life. The third stage is the information declination. This is represented by the second vertical ladder. This is the ladder where we begin to climb down. This is the stage where our body begins to slow down. The last instruction of the genetic program. The time where we close our eyes and say goodbye.

Life Expectancy of some Animals:

1. Ant (Drone) - 3 weeks
2. Guinea pigs - 4 years
3. Mouse - 1 year
4. Chameleon - 1 year
5. Cat - 25 years
6. Mosquito fish - 2 years
7. Dog - 22 years
8. Dragonflies - 4 months
9. Housefly - 28 days
10. Butterflies - 6 weeks
11. Mayflies - 24 hours
12. Rabbits - 8 years

Death has its own purpose. It is inevitable. Everyone and everything will die. It is just in a matter of time so to speak. Mayflies die within 24 hours. Butterflies live only in weeks. Some, like dragonflies, live only by months. Why? It is a natural law, genetic instruction. Everyone shares their own death in different ways. It might look morbid but it is not. It is just only how we perceive death that it seems unpleasant.

What is unpleasant is the disease. The body, when it's time to go, makes its own way to bring its own body down. One day it is healthy, the next day, when it is ready to go, the body finds its way to be ill. The illness takes over, controls our walking, seeing, breathing, and even destroys its own organs like the heart and kidneys. Once all these things are gradually happening, the body is on its stage of dying. We humans don't have control over them. Medicines are just extenders to prolong one's life. When the body wants to turn off its own system. it can turn off itself. It is wired on its gene. It is capable to execute its final code - its final instruction - Death.

* According to cdc.org, about 75 million American adults have high blood pressure � that's 1 of every 3 adults. This means that 1/3 of its population is suffering from high blood pressure. This group ranges from 40 to 80 yrs old. The other 1/3 is suffering from other diseases like diabetes, cancers, heart, and brain episodes. This group ranges from 40 to 80 yrs old as well. The remaining 1/3 is the healthy group. They range from 1 to 40 yrs old. They are the youngs - our kids, our sons, and daughters growing up along the ascending side of the curve. Now, what if the pharmaceutical companies shut down, what will happen to the group who are from 40 to 80 yrs old?



"Death is the final genetic code in the algorithm of life." ~ Joey Lawsin

I was browsing my Facebook the other day when this picture caught my attention. It was a picture of a dog who was maltreated by his owner who poured boiling water all over his body for chewing the owner's phone. His miserable conditions broke my heart in deep pain that I need to stop this animal cruelty and raise awareness about the negative aspects of humanizing animals. This article was penned with the intention to educate animal owners to never ever raise their pets like human beings.

People don't realize that when we humanize a pet like a dog, a cat, a bird, or a bear, we are actually raising a human being in an animal suit. This might be a strong statement, but this is a fact according to the Caveman in the Box Trilogy Theory. Humans and animals might seems to be two different species, but when they live side by side with exactly the same surroundings, they become actually two similar objects, in terms of emotions, intelligence, behaviors, and health. When both are raised in the same controlled environment as our homes, humans and animals are emotionally, mentally, physically, and socially the same. How is this so?

Imagine that we are simultaneously raising in the same house two newborn beings: a puppy and a baby.

In this house, the baby is nurtured by the whole family: by a mother, father, brothers, and sisters. Every day, she also sensed the dynamics of the house: she hears the sounds of her mother's calls, sees the contour of her mother's smile, feels the softness of her mother's touch, tastes the flatness of her mother's milk, and even smells the aroma of her mother's scent. She also reacts subconsciously with her home environments like the temperature of the room, the sounds from the television, the smells from the kitchen, and the noises from the whole family. All these sensational interactions that she gradually acquires come to her as pieces of information. They eventually settle down in her mind. From this house, a confined surrounding or environment is where all information begins. It is the primary source that molds the baby's totality, entireness, and her becoming a being, a human being.

Also, in the same house, the puppy is raised by the same people. He is also surrounded by the same dad, mom, and kids. The puppy also hears, smells, sees, and feels everyone and everything in the house. He also reacts with the temperature inside and outside the house, the sounds from the radio and television, the aroma from the kitchen, the taste of the food, and the synergies within the family. Just like with the baby, the same pieces of information are also stored in his brain. And from the same house, with everything is the same, the dog too becomes a being, a human being as well.

Thus, when love and care are provided to the baby, the same love and care are felt by the puppy. When both baby and puppy are placed in the same bed next to the owner, both species will also experience the same comfort, protection, and affection. What the baby sees, smells, feels, hears is what the puppy sees, smells feels, and hears as well. When they are placed in the garage overnight, both will also experience the same nastiness, coldness, loneliness, and anxieties. Whatever the situation is, both beings will identically undergo the same exact experiences. It is not because one is a puppy or a baby, but it is all because they were brought up in the same exact environment.

The environment makes who they are. It is where information comes from. It is a container, a source of information, storage of knowledge. When two species live in the same environment, both will definitely acquire the same exact information. Just like the baby and puppy, the information obtained by the baby will exactly be the same information gained by the puppy because they are identically surrounded by the same objects and people in the house. The information they gained from the house programmed them to be the same beings.

However, some might argue that the baby is totally different from the puppy because the brain of the child is more complex than the brain of the dog. Again, this is another misconception. Why? At some very early age, they come with the same "empty" brains. The brain doesn't come with information yet from birth. According to the experiment below, Information must be acquired, compared, codified, and transmitted first before it becomes communal knowledge. The brain follows this process of acquisition, association, codexation, and transmission to be fully functional.

In a thought experiment, known as The Caveman in the Box Trilogy, the argument above can be thoroughly examined by investigating the origin, creation, and evolution of early information with the following leading questions: 1. How did information emerge into the early minds of the very first humans? 2. Who supplied our primitive ancestors with information? 3. Where did it originate? Where did it come from? 4. Was the source of information a who or a what? Was it god, space aliens, or something else?

In this experiment, a newborn son of a caveman was placed inside a well-designed state-of-the-art fully automated laboratory "box" - where food, water, and everything that the boy needs for his survival, growth, and development were technologically provided. However, he was not allowed ever to see anyone or hear anything. He was totally isolated from the world from birth to adulthood.

Parallel to this same scenario was another box. The box of his father, the first human on earth, who was also placed in isolation from birth to adulthood. The only difference between the two boxes was that the father's box was Mother Nature; the world surrounded by plants, animals, objects, and natural elements.

A third box was also present. The box of his father's dog. This four-legged creature was also isolated from birth to adulthood with the same environment as the second box. The only difference between the master and the dog was that the dog was an animal.

From these three scenarios the following scientific questions were raised:

Who among these three will acquire lots of information?
Who will never acquire any information at all?
Will they be aware of themselves?
Will they become aware of their own surrounding?
Will they figure out that they are alive?
Will they understand the things surrounding them? How?
How many words will they acquire?
If things are not explained to them, how will they know and understand them?
Will their minds stay empty for the rest of their lives?
Will they become conscious of their environments?
Will instinct kicks in?
If instinct is true, what are these instincts that they possess?
How did these instincts develop in the first place?
Will they stay and act like babies throughout their adulthood?

From this thought experiment, the following conclusions were determined:

1. The brain is a clean slate from birth.
2. Humans acquire information from the environment.
3. The environment makes who and what we are today.
4. Nature is the Mother of Information.
5. Information can only be acquired in two ways: by choice or by chance.
6. Instinct is not inborn but a learned behavior.
7. Information originates from the outside and flows into the inside mind.
8. It is inhuman to humanize animals, it is like raising a child in a cage.

In summary, when we humanize a puppy, we are actually raising a human baby. What is disturbing, we place the baby in the crib while we place the puppy in a cage.

I hate you when you call me names
I hate you when you look at me - blank face
I hate you when you mock at me
I hate you when you treat me as if I am not human.

Do you know that I can memorize
all the names of my families and relatives
all their birthdays and phone numbers
all the players and teams of any sports
all newspapers and schedules in the subways
And I know you don’t

Do you know that I can easily define patterns
in all the things that I see, I touch,
I hear, I smell, I taste and I dream
And I know you don’t

Do you know that I have a lot of great things in my mind
I can solve intricate mathematical equations
I can create worlds that you have not thought before
I can paint life like a magical innocent smile of a child
And I know you don’t

I want to talk to you,
but I was not given a chance
I want to tell you about the sky
but I startle when I talk
I want to tell you about duality
but I have trouble relating my mind
I want to play hide and seek
but I could not look at into your eyes
I might flaps my hand or walk on tiptoe
because these are my ways of telling you
Can we be normal and be friends?

But you set norms and rules
because you are many and we are not
Label us as a disorder or a disease
because we behave differently and you are not
Diagnose us by behaviors and observations
because you think you are smart and we are not
But I’m sorry to disagree, your theory is your opinion - not ours!

But when I hate you
It does not mean that I do not love you
It does not mean that I do not care about you
It does not mean that we cannot be together
But simply because
You do not understand me.

~ Joey Lawsin