What do you think?
Rate this book
賴賳乇 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳
=The Art of Loving
The renowned psychoanalyst Erich Fromm has helped millions achieve rich, productive lives by developing their hidden capacities for love. In this astonishly frank and candid book, he explores the ways in which this extraordinary emotion can alter the whole course of life.
Most of us are unable to develop our capacities for love on the only level that really counts: a love that is compounded of maturity, self-knowledge and courage. Learning to love, like other arts, demands practice and concentration. Even more than any other art it demands genuine insight and understanding. In this book, Fromm discusses love in all its aspects; not only romantic love, so surrounded by misconceptions, but also love of parents for children, brotherly love, erotic love, self-love and love of God.
235 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1956
10.2k people are currently reading
164k people want to read
About the author
Erich Fromm
551听books5,085听followersErich Fromm, Ph.D. (Sociology, University of Heidelberg, 1922) was a German-American social psychologist, psychoanalyst, sociologist, humanistic philosopher, and democratic socialist. He was a German Jew who fled the Nazi regime and settled in the United States. He was one of the founders of The William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis and Psychology in New York City and was associated with the Frankfurt School of critical theory.
Fromm explored the interaction between psychology and society, and held various professorships in psychology in the U.S. and Mexico in the mid-20th century.
Fromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of course, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and so on. In other words, Freud postulated that our characters were determined by biology. Marx, on the other hand, saw people as determined by their society, and most especially by their economic systems.
Fromm explored the interaction between psychology and society, and held various professorships in psychology in the U.S. and Mexico in the mid-20th century.
Fromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of course, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and so on. In other words, Freud postulated that our characters were determined by biology. Marx, on the other hand, saw people as determined by their society, and most especially by their economic systems.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 5,421 reviews
June 10, 2011
My goodness, what is this dude smoking?
Someone close to me made me aware that this book existed, and so out of curiosity, I decided to borrow the book from the library and read it. It took me 2 days, and really, I hated every bit of this book, for several reasons that I will delineate below. But first, let me tell you what this book is about.
Obviously, this is non-fiction. This is written by Erich Fromm, a prominent German social psychologist who happens to belong to the Frankfurt School, also known as the proponents of Critical Theory. And in this book, Fromm outlines his theory of love, and how it is an art. As with other arts, such as painting and sculpture, he claims that love has two parts: theory and practice. The book is divided accordingly.
In the theory section, he goes over five different types of love: brotherly love, motherly love, erotic love, self-love, and love of God. He explains the different functions of these different types, and its various characteristics. And in the practice section, he basically gives various factors that affect and influence the practice of love.
So, where do I begin criticizing this work? First of all, I deeply hated the fact that his arguments are all along the lines of speculation. I am all for empiricism, and he has all these grandiose claims that were never proven with evidence, all throughout the book. He has claims for example about the difference between motherly and fatherly love, about the importance of the male-female divide, about mothers and instinct, but all of his arguments are conjecture, and not actually supported by empirical evidence. I being a scientist have big problems with that.
I also think that he suffers from a cultural bias, in that in Eurocentric cultures, at least, love as a concept actually refers to various different things, which roughly corresponds to the different "types" of love. However, I think that it is just an accident of language that English has one word to refer to all of those, which gives the illusion that all of these concepts are inter-related and compose a superset of human emotions. However, one simply has to look to other cultures, and one will realize that there are actually different words that refer to these "types" of love. Greek for example has four different words for what the English language refers to as "love". C. S. Lewis actually has a book discussing the Four Loves as seen in Christianity. Thus, I fear that this book, which is in a way a typology of "love" may actually be resting on the false premise that there is something in common will all manifestations of love, and that Fromm is just undergoing an endeavor that is ontologically faulty. This can be seen by the various differing assumptions that he makes regarding the different types of love.
Speaking of assumptions, this is another part in which I have problems with. He makes all these assumptions about the various characteristics of various "loves" but I can think of so many counter-examples to prove him wrong.
One assumption he has is the instinct of the mother to her offspring, and how that is the defining factor in motherly love. He claims that mothers by virtue of giving birth of her child, are predisposed to love her child unconditionally. I believe the contrary. I think I can re-explain every phenomenon he tackles with a simpler rule, without resorting to various other assumptions, and that is by claiming that "love" as we know it is simply a matter of constraint satisfaction and selfishness. We show love to a target because we need something from the target: whether it be one's child, one's brother, one's sexual partner, or one's God. If the need goes away, then we stop showing love. Thus, in the case of motherly love, when there is another need that is present in the mother, that runs counter to the need pertaining to the infant, then the mother will sooner or later give up the child for adoption, abandoning the infant in one way or another. If motherly love were instinctive, then we won't actually be witness to the grave number of orphanages around the world.
Another assumption he makes is the centrality of the male-female opposition. He claims that these two poles are necessary for real erotic love to happen. By implication, he explicitly claims that homosexuals are incapable of love. I tend to disagree. Personally, I believe that humans can be post-gendered and has the ability to be attracted to another person, regardless of the other person's gender, if one's constraints are set up that way. Thus, gender variation for me is just a matter of constraint setting. I do not like the fact that Fromm categorically eliminates the ability to love from non-heterosexual people. Perhaps it is just the sign of the times he was living in (the book was published in 1956), and important studies by Alfred Kinsey and Evelyn Hooker were not around yet. As of 1956, homosexuality was still listed as a mental illness according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and wasn't removed from the list until 1974. Alfred Kinsey published two seminal volumes on sexual behavior of the human male and female, and Evelyn Hooker did several series of experiments providing evidence that self-identified homosexuals were no worse in social adjustment than the general population. I actually found her experiments rather neat, where she took two groups of samples: homosexuals and heterosexuals. She conducted three tests across the two groups: the Thematic Apperception Test; the Make-a-Picture-Story Test; and the Rorschach Inkblot Test. She then asked other specialists to determine whether there is a significant difference between the two samples based on their test performance. In all tests, the specialists' ability to differentiate was no better than chance, suggesting that there are no significant differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals when it comes to social performance.
Fromm also has a section on love of God. Again, I can explain this by selfishness. Love of God for me is simply another term for therapeutic delusion. Humans sometimes need to feel that they are not in total control of their lives, to the point that they construct an entity "higher" than them. This in effect removes the blame from themselves, whenever there is a tragic event that has happened. Things that are seemingly beyond their control are given an explanation by invoking the notion of God. This for me is a selfish act, because it's basically a form of a survival mechanism. The human basically victimizes oneself and removes the responsibility and reassigns it to God. Having belief in God also has a second function, and that is to give hope, hoping that the afterlife is better than the present, which again is a survival mechanism, because otherwise, people may not be able to survive the present.
Now, I have tried to explain the concept of love by recasting it in terms of selfishness. I do believe that human behavior can be reduced to two terms: selfishness and curiosity. Love is never self-sacrificing. Someone told me that we only continue to love if we are loved in return: we love our mates as long as our mates love us. If not, then the relationship breaks down.
So the question is, do I believe in love? I guess the answer depends on what that question actually means. If by believing in love, it refers to the act of immediately finding oneself attracted to some other person, with no rhyme or reason, then I have to answer no. However, if by believing in love, it refers to the act of ascertaining whether an individual is beneficial for oneself, that even though one can survive by its own, one has determined that the system can be improved by factoring in the other person, and therefore pursuing that person, then my answer is yes. Love for me is a selfish act: it's an act of system improvement. It is an economic act, getting something from someone else in exchange for something else. Thus, a successful relationship occurs whenever there are two people who mutually satisfies the needs of each other.
So, I have offered here a counter explanation to the phenomenon of love. I believe that it is a simpler explanation, satisfying Occam's Razor. I have fewer assumptions: constraint satisfaction and selfishness. I only assume that those are the two big factors, and the variation on human behavior can be explained by modulating the various constraints that are different across the board. I believe that my thesis here is also testable: I could easily imagine a way to sample this, and one can run a regression model and see whether the factors really are significant or not. Needless to say, I belong more to the experimental psychology camp, than the Frankfurt School.
And needless to say, I was dissatisfied with this book. I am giving it 0.5 out of 5 stars.
Someone close to me made me aware that this book existed, and so out of curiosity, I decided to borrow the book from the library and read it. It took me 2 days, and really, I hated every bit of this book, for several reasons that I will delineate below. But first, let me tell you what this book is about.
Obviously, this is non-fiction. This is written by Erich Fromm, a prominent German social psychologist who happens to belong to the Frankfurt School, also known as the proponents of Critical Theory. And in this book, Fromm outlines his theory of love, and how it is an art. As with other arts, such as painting and sculpture, he claims that love has two parts: theory and practice. The book is divided accordingly.
In the theory section, he goes over five different types of love: brotherly love, motherly love, erotic love, self-love, and love of God. He explains the different functions of these different types, and its various characteristics. And in the practice section, he basically gives various factors that affect and influence the practice of love.
So, where do I begin criticizing this work? First of all, I deeply hated the fact that his arguments are all along the lines of speculation. I am all for empiricism, and he has all these grandiose claims that were never proven with evidence, all throughout the book. He has claims for example about the difference between motherly and fatherly love, about the importance of the male-female divide, about mothers and instinct, but all of his arguments are conjecture, and not actually supported by empirical evidence. I being a scientist have big problems with that.
I also think that he suffers from a cultural bias, in that in Eurocentric cultures, at least, love as a concept actually refers to various different things, which roughly corresponds to the different "types" of love. However, I think that it is just an accident of language that English has one word to refer to all of those, which gives the illusion that all of these concepts are inter-related and compose a superset of human emotions. However, one simply has to look to other cultures, and one will realize that there are actually different words that refer to these "types" of love. Greek for example has four different words for what the English language refers to as "love". C. S. Lewis actually has a book discussing the Four Loves as seen in Christianity. Thus, I fear that this book, which is in a way a typology of "love" may actually be resting on the false premise that there is something in common will all manifestations of love, and that Fromm is just undergoing an endeavor that is ontologically faulty. This can be seen by the various differing assumptions that he makes regarding the different types of love.
Speaking of assumptions, this is another part in which I have problems with. He makes all these assumptions about the various characteristics of various "loves" but I can think of so many counter-examples to prove him wrong.
One assumption he has is the instinct of the mother to her offspring, and how that is the defining factor in motherly love. He claims that mothers by virtue of giving birth of her child, are predisposed to love her child unconditionally. I believe the contrary. I think I can re-explain every phenomenon he tackles with a simpler rule, without resorting to various other assumptions, and that is by claiming that "love" as we know it is simply a matter of constraint satisfaction and selfishness. We show love to a target because we need something from the target: whether it be one's child, one's brother, one's sexual partner, or one's God. If the need goes away, then we stop showing love. Thus, in the case of motherly love, when there is another need that is present in the mother, that runs counter to the need pertaining to the infant, then the mother will sooner or later give up the child for adoption, abandoning the infant in one way or another. If motherly love were instinctive, then we won't actually be witness to the grave number of orphanages around the world.
Another assumption he makes is the centrality of the male-female opposition. He claims that these two poles are necessary for real erotic love to happen. By implication, he explicitly claims that homosexuals are incapable of love. I tend to disagree. Personally, I believe that humans can be post-gendered and has the ability to be attracted to another person, regardless of the other person's gender, if one's constraints are set up that way. Thus, gender variation for me is just a matter of constraint setting. I do not like the fact that Fromm categorically eliminates the ability to love from non-heterosexual people. Perhaps it is just the sign of the times he was living in (the book was published in 1956), and important studies by Alfred Kinsey and Evelyn Hooker were not around yet. As of 1956, homosexuality was still listed as a mental illness according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and wasn't removed from the list until 1974. Alfred Kinsey published two seminal volumes on sexual behavior of the human male and female, and Evelyn Hooker did several series of experiments providing evidence that self-identified homosexuals were no worse in social adjustment than the general population. I actually found her experiments rather neat, where she took two groups of samples: homosexuals and heterosexuals. She conducted three tests across the two groups: the Thematic Apperception Test; the Make-a-Picture-Story Test; and the Rorschach Inkblot Test. She then asked other specialists to determine whether there is a significant difference between the two samples based on their test performance. In all tests, the specialists' ability to differentiate was no better than chance, suggesting that there are no significant differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals when it comes to social performance.
Fromm also has a section on love of God. Again, I can explain this by selfishness. Love of God for me is simply another term for therapeutic delusion. Humans sometimes need to feel that they are not in total control of their lives, to the point that they construct an entity "higher" than them. This in effect removes the blame from themselves, whenever there is a tragic event that has happened. Things that are seemingly beyond their control are given an explanation by invoking the notion of God. This for me is a selfish act, because it's basically a form of a survival mechanism. The human basically victimizes oneself and removes the responsibility and reassigns it to God. Having belief in God also has a second function, and that is to give hope, hoping that the afterlife is better than the present, which again is a survival mechanism, because otherwise, people may not be able to survive the present.
Now, I have tried to explain the concept of love by recasting it in terms of selfishness. I do believe that human behavior can be reduced to two terms: selfishness and curiosity. Love is never self-sacrificing. Someone told me that we only continue to love if we are loved in return: we love our mates as long as our mates love us. If not, then the relationship breaks down.
So the question is, do I believe in love? I guess the answer depends on what that question actually means. If by believing in love, it refers to the act of immediately finding oneself attracted to some other person, with no rhyme or reason, then I have to answer no. However, if by believing in love, it refers to the act of ascertaining whether an individual is beneficial for oneself, that even though one can survive by its own, one has determined that the system can be improved by factoring in the other person, and therefore pursuing that person, then my answer is yes. Love for me is a selfish act: it's an act of system improvement. It is an economic act, getting something from someone else in exchange for something else. Thus, a successful relationship occurs whenever there are two people who mutually satisfies the needs of each other.
So, I have offered here a counter explanation to the phenomenon of love. I believe that it is a simpler explanation, satisfying Occam's Razor. I have fewer assumptions: constraint satisfaction and selfishness. I only assume that those are the two big factors, and the variation on human behavior can be explained by modulating the various constraints that are different across the board. I believe that my thesis here is also testable: I could easily imagine a way to sample this, and one can run a regression model and see whether the factors really are significant or not. Needless to say, I belong more to the experimental psychology camp, than the Frankfurt School.
And needless to say, I was dissatisfied with this book. I am giving it 0.5 out of 5 stars.
June 9, 2015
I went through this book again partly because it has so much to say, and partly because I wanted to re-read Erich Fromm's instructions on how to meditate. I like the way he puts it, on pages 101 - 102:
鈥淚f I am attached to another person because I cannot stand on my own feet, he or she may be a lifesaver, but the relationship is not one of love. Paradoxically, the ability to be alone is the condition for the ability to love. Anyone who tries to be alone with himself will discover how difficult it is. He will begin to feel restless, fidgety, or even to sense considerable anxiety. He will be prone to rationalize his unwillingness to go on with this practice by thinking that it has no value, is just silly, that it takes too much time, and so on, and so on. He will also observe that all sorts of thoughts come to mind which take possession of him. He will find himself thinking about his plans for later in the day, or about some difficulty in a job he has to do, or where to go in the evening, or about any number of things that fill his mind 鈥� rather than permitting it to empty itself. It would be helpful to practice a few very simple exercises, as for instance, to sit in a relaxed position (neither slouching, nor rigid), to close one鈥檚 eyes, and to try to see a white screen in front of one鈥檚 eyes, and to try to remove all interfering pictures and thoughts, then to try to follow one鈥檚 breathing; not to think about it, nor force it, but to follow it 鈥� and in doing so to sense it; furthermore to try to have a sense of 'I'; I = myself, as the center of my powers, as the creator of my world. One should, at least, do such a concentration exercise every morning for twenty minutes (and if possible longer) and every evening before going to bed.鈥�
鈥淚f I am attached to another person because I cannot stand on my own feet, he or she may be a lifesaver, but the relationship is not one of love. Paradoxically, the ability to be alone is the condition for the ability to love. Anyone who tries to be alone with himself will discover how difficult it is. He will begin to feel restless, fidgety, or even to sense considerable anxiety. He will be prone to rationalize his unwillingness to go on with this practice by thinking that it has no value, is just silly, that it takes too much time, and so on, and so on. He will also observe that all sorts of thoughts come to mind which take possession of him. He will find himself thinking about his plans for later in the day, or about some difficulty in a job he has to do, or where to go in the evening, or about any number of things that fill his mind 鈥� rather than permitting it to empty itself. It would be helpful to practice a few very simple exercises, as for instance, to sit in a relaxed position (neither slouching, nor rigid), to close one鈥檚 eyes, and to try to see a white screen in front of one鈥檚 eyes, and to try to remove all interfering pictures and thoughts, then to try to follow one鈥檚 breathing; not to think about it, nor force it, but to follow it 鈥� and in doing so to sense it; furthermore to try to have a sense of 'I'; I = myself, as the center of my powers, as the creator of my world. One should, at least, do such a concentration exercise every morning for twenty minutes (and if possible longer) and every evening before going to bed.鈥�
May 17, 2022
Gave up at 1/3 because it simply became unbearable.
If you are a very traditional conservative white middle-class person, who is familiar with the bible but still loves Freud: you have found your guide. If you are any other category of human, this book is probably not for you.
The labelling of love between gay people as a mistake and a failure, the endless sexism in describing the roles of men and women, I could go on and on...
I can see a little spark in the text every now and then, some hopeful words that can be seen as wise and guiding. But if the wrapping of these messages is just one big pile of discrimination (not very lovable..) then I simply cannot take it.
If you have this book on your shelves and want to make it useful somehow: for a good workout, do some push ups every time you encounter the word 'penetration'.
If you are a very traditional conservative white middle-class person, who is familiar with the bible but still loves Freud: you have found your guide. If you are any other category of human, this book is probably not for you.
The labelling of love between gay people as a mistake and a failure, the endless sexism in describing the roles of men and women, I could go on and on...
I can see a little spark in the text every now and then, some hopeful words that can be seen as wise and guiding. But if the wrapping of these messages is just one big pile of discrimination (not very lovable..) then I simply cannot take it.
If you have this book on your shelves and want to make it useful somehow: for a good workout, do some push ups every time you encounter the word 'penetration'.
August 31, 2021
The Art of Loving, Erich Fromm
The Art of Loving, is a 1956 book, by psychoanalyst and social philosopher Erich Fromm, which was published as part of the World Perspectives Series, edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen.
In this work, Fromm develops his perspective on human nature, from his earlier work, Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself 鈥� principles which he revisits in many of his other major works.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 丿夭 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 乇賵夭賴丕 爻丕賱 1974賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 賴賳乇 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕乇蹖卮 賮乇賵賲貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 倬賵乇蹖 爻賱胤丕賳蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1348貨 丿乇 235氐貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 毓卮賯 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 鬲亘丕乇 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 讴鬲丨丿賴 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 倬丕乇丕诏乇丕賮: (丌蹖丕 毓卮賯 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲責 丕诏乇 賴賳乇 亘丕卮丿 丌蹖丕 亘賴 丿丕賳卮 賵 讴賵卮卮 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 丕爻鬲責 丌蹖丕 毓卮賯 丕丨爻丕爻蹖 賲胤亘賵毓 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇讴 丌賳 亘爻鬲诏蹖 亘賴 亘禺鬲 丌丿賲蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 蹖毓賳蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕诏乇 亘禺鬲 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貙 丌丿賲蹖 亘丿丕賳 芦诏乇賮鬲丕乇禄 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賲亘丕丨孬 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 讴賵趩讴 賲亘鬲賳蹖 亘乇 倬乇爻卮 丕賵賱 丕爻鬲貙 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 丕讴孬乇 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 鬲毓亘蹖乇 丿賵賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲毓鬲賯丿賳丿.)貨 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
賳賯賱 丿蹖诏乇: 丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖丿丕賳丿貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 毓卮賯 賳賲蹖賵乇夭丿貙 丌賳讴賴 毓卮賯 賲蹖賵乇夭丿貙 亘蹖诏賲丕賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賲蹖丿丕賳丿. 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
亘爻蹖丕乇 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 丕夭 禺賵丕賳卮 丿賵亘丕乇賴 丕卮貙 賴賲蹖卮賴 丌賮乇蹖賳 亘乇 賴賳乇 毓卮賯貙 丿乇讴 賵 鬲賲蹖夭 噩丿丕卅蹖 賵 賵氐丕賱貙 賳爻禺賴 賲乇丿丕丿 賲丕賴 爻丕賱 1353賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貙 亘丕 诏賮鬲丕乇蹖 丕夭 噩賳丕亘 芦賲噩蹖丿 乇賴賳賲丕禄貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 25/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 08/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
The Art of Loving, is a 1956 book, by psychoanalyst and social philosopher Erich Fromm, which was published as part of the World Perspectives Series, edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen.
In this work, Fromm develops his perspective on human nature, from his earlier work, Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself 鈥� principles which he revisits in many of his other major works.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 丿夭 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 乇賵夭賴丕 爻丕賱 1974賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 賴賳乇 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丕乇蹖卮 賮乇賵賲貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 倬賵乇蹖 爻賱胤丕賳蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1348貨 丿乇 235氐貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 毓卮賯 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 鬲亘丕乇 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 讴鬲丨丿賴 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 倬丕乇丕诏乇丕賮: (丌蹖丕 毓卮賯 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲責 丕诏乇 賴賳乇 亘丕卮丿 丌蹖丕 亘賴 丿丕賳卮 賵 讴賵卮卮 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿 丕爻鬲責 丌蹖丕 毓卮賯 丕丨爻丕爻蹖 賲胤亘賵毓 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇讴 丌賳 亘爻鬲诏蹖 亘賴 亘禺鬲 丌丿賲蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 蹖毓賳蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕诏乇 亘禺鬲 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貙 丌丿賲蹖 亘丿丕賳 芦诏乇賮鬲丕乇禄 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賲亘丕丨孬 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 讴賵趩讴 賲亘鬲賳蹖 亘乇 倬乇爻卮 丕賵賱 丕爻鬲貙 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 丕讴孬乇 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 鬲毓亘蹖乇 丿賵賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲毓鬲賯丿賳丿.)貨 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
賳賯賱 丿蹖诏乇: 丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖丿丕賳丿貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 毓卮賯 賳賲蹖賵乇夭丿貙 丌賳讴賴 毓卮賯 賲蹖賵乇夭丿貙 亘蹖诏賲丕賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賲蹖丿丕賳丿. 倬丕蹖丕賳 賳賯賱
亘爻蹖丕乇 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 丕夭 禺賵丕賳卮 丿賵亘丕乇賴 丕卮貙 賴賲蹖卮賴 丌賮乇蹖賳 亘乇 賴賳乇 毓卮賯貙 丿乇讴 賵 鬲賲蹖夭 噩丿丕卅蹖 賵 賵氐丕賱貙 賳爻禺賴 賲乇丿丕丿 賲丕賴 爻丕賱 1353賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貙 亘丕 诏賮鬲丕乇蹖 丕夭 噩賳丕亘 芦賲噩蹖丿 乇賴賳賲丕禄貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 25/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 08/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
November 12, 2024
La t铆pica pregunta 驴Qu茅 es el amor? Erich Fromm lo explica en este libro, pero claro, es muy dif铆cil que una sola persona sea due帽a de la verdad a un tipo de respuesta como en este tema.
Sus hip贸tesis y tambi茅n afirmaciones son interesantes. Varios tipos de amor y sentimiento puro, algo que en esta sociedad contempor谩nea hemos perdido, quiz谩s debido a la globalizaci贸n, la carga de trabajo, la falta de tiempo, o lo que sea. El amor, al ser arte, tiene un valor tambi茅n hist贸rico, cultural y social, entre otras cosas. El amor mirado desde diferentes perspectivas. Hay algunas cosas en las que no concuerdo o me parecen demasiado extra帽as, pero siempre es interesante mirar otros puntos de vista.
驴Recomendado? S铆, hace ver al amor como quiz谩s no lo vi antes y a partir de eso, analizarlo fr铆amente.
Sus hip贸tesis y tambi茅n afirmaciones son interesantes. Varios tipos de amor y sentimiento puro, algo que en esta sociedad contempor谩nea hemos perdido, quiz谩s debido a la globalizaci贸n, la carga de trabajo, la falta de tiempo, o lo que sea. El amor, al ser arte, tiene un valor tambi茅n hist贸rico, cultural y social, entre otras cosas. El amor mirado desde diferentes perspectivas. Hay algunas cosas en las que no concuerdo o me parecen demasiado extra帽as, pero siempre es interesante mirar otros puntos de vista.
驴Recomendado? S铆, hace ver al amor como quiz谩s no lo vi antes y a partir de eso, analizarlo fr铆amente.
August 8, 2008
If my mate George hadn鈥檛 recommended this book there is no chance at all that I would have read it. I鈥檝e a strange relationship with LOVE 鈥� in that I think it is grossly overrated by our society. You could get away with thinking that if you were not 鈥榠n love鈥� in our society then there is something terribly wrong with you. Never mind that the notion of being constantly 鈥榠n love鈥� 鈥� in a world where this is all too frequently confused with being infatuated 鈥� would be a nightmare not worth living.
As I said to George 鈥� I can see why people settle for sex, rather than love. Fromm鈥檚 idea of love sounds far too hard.
This is what I would generally call a 鈥榳hite-board鈥� book. A book in which someone has picked a term rich in meaning 鈥� in this case love, but other鈥檚 I鈥檝e read have been on Lust or the parts of the human body - and run with it. Germaine Greer has one out at the moment called Rage I believe, although she could just as easily have written one called mock-outrage.
All sorts of love are covered, Brotherly Love, Romantic Love, Religious Love, Motherly Love鈥� Like I said, a white-board book where a huge mind-map has been padded out into continuous prose.
This all makes the book sound much less interesting than I actually found it 鈥� but I want to give you an idea of some of my dissatisfactions too. I mentioned that I was reading Fromm to someone at work and he asked who is Fromm. I said, 鈥淚 guess he is a bit of a Freudian鈥揗arxist with an interest in Buddhism.鈥� My friend looked at me quizzically for a moment and said, 鈥淲ell, it isn鈥檛 exactly saying, 鈥榩ick me up and read me鈥� just yet.鈥� I didn鈥檛 dare tell him what the book was called.
When I was separating from my wife a very dear friend of mine suggested that I read a book called, Pulling Your Own Strings. I worked at the City Council and had the luxury of being able to turn to the computer on my desk, order a book from the city library and have it appear on my desk the very next day. There are few nicer pleasures in life. Anyway, the book appeared and it had a rainbow in the cover鈥� I told her that I didn鈥檛 think I could read this book. The problem being that I would need to read it mostly on public transport 鈥� and a rainbow, I mean, Jesus. I said to her, 鈥淟ook, the title is bad enough, but at least I can pretend that I thought it was about masturbation, but a rainbow鈥here is no excuse for a rainbow unless the book is called something like, Classic Gay Shortstories.鈥�
There is a very similar problem with a book called, The Art of Loving. One expects it to be written by Hugh Heffner or Dr Shagalot.
The question is what is love? Is it a rather pleasant sensation or an art and therefore something one learns and gets better at over time? Fromm points out that mostly we act as if love were a sensation 鈥� something that happens to us and we have mostly no control over. We believe that love is something that just is. We can鈥檛 help who we fall in love with, we can鈥檛 help who we fall out of love with and we fundamentally believe that there is someone out there that is just right for us. There is no effort involved in loving 鈥� in fact, effort implies the two people weren鈥檛 really 鈥榤ade for each other鈥� and that effortless love is the only 鈥榬eal鈥� love. We look down on other cultures where marriages are 鈥榓rranged鈥� and although I won鈥檛 be arranging my daughters鈥� marriages, I鈥檓 not quite so smug about the 鈥榮elf-evident鈥� superiority of marrying for 鈥榣ove鈥�.
The main problem with arranged marriages, for me, is not the impossibility of love in these types of marriage 鈥� the arranged marriages I鈥檝e witnessed in my life have involved much more 鈥榗hoice鈥� than we generally consider possible in our standard Western interpretation or plots for dozens of Disney cartoons. The real problem is how women in such marriages tend to be traded like chattel. It is hard to see how this could possibly be avoided in 鈥榓rranged marriages鈥� 鈥� although, in the large grey area between the black of arranged marriages and the white of marrying for love there are 鈥榖lind dates organised by friends鈥� and 鈥榤arry anyone you can get your hands on so as not to end up on the shelf鈥� and other such shades.
One of the things I found most interesting, and perhaps one of the most illuminating ideas in the book, was his talk about the love of God. Quite early on he says, 鈥淚n conventional Western theology the attempt is made to know God by thought, to make statements about God. It is assumed that I can know God in my thought. In mysticism, which is the consequent outcome of monotheism 鈥� the attempt is given up to know God by thought, and it is replaced by the experience of union with God in which there is no more room 鈥� and no need 鈥� for knowledge about 骋辞诲.鈥�
Love for another person 鈥� particularly love for a life-partner (as I guess it would be called today) 鈥� is fairly similar to this love of God, love as atonement with God. Fromm repeatedly says that our highest desire (whether we recognise it or not) is unity with another. For Fromm this is the ground of love of all people and true love of another is premised on our being able to love everyone. There are all manner of qualifications for this unity 鈥� not unlike the line from The Prophet:
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but each one of you be alone, even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music.
The big downer 鈥� to use an Americanism 鈥� is that Fromm barely feels that true love is possible in Western Capitalist societies. Our obsession with consumerism; our ideas that love is a sensation, rather than an art; our alienation from our essential selves; our inability to concentrate and focus 鈥� all of these work against us truly 鈥榖eing鈥� in love.
This, then, is the Buddhist aspect of Fromm. The point is to learn how to be in the present 鈥� and being in the present implies truly being 鈥榳ith鈥� your partner. I think I finally got the point of sex once I realised it wasn鈥檛 about what I was feeling, but about understanding and anticipating the feelings of the person I was with. When I was too young to understand I heard Dave Allen tell a joke on TV about a newly married couple who rolled over to go to sleep rather than finish having sex after one of them asked, 鈥淐an鈥檛 you think of anyone else either?鈥� I鈥檇 have preferred to have never been old enough to understand that joke. Shakespeare makes a similar point when he has Edmund (why do his 鈥榖ad-guys鈥� so often get the best lines?) say in King Lear about the lecherous begetters of bastard children when compared to most 鈥榤arried sexual partners鈥�, 鈥淲ho, in the lusty stealth of Nature, take more composition and fierce quality than doth, within a dull, stale, tired bed, go to th鈥� creating a whole tribe of fobs got 鈥榯ween a sleep and wake?鈥�
Gods, stand up for bastards indeed.
Or as Fromm himself would have it: 鈥淭he main condition for the achievement of love is the overcoming of one鈥檚 narcissism鈥�.
But it is not just about being present in bed for Fromm. Loving is about being alive 鈥� and being alive is about being truly conscious. Fromm is concerned that many of us think life is somehow supposed to be about 鈥榬elaxing鈥� 鈥� to Fromm the only time one should relax is when one is asleep. He is a man well aware that time, and therefore life itself, is not to be wasted 鈥� that we are better to wear out than to rust.
More than once I experienced a 鈥榮hock of recognition鈥� in reading this book, particularly towards the end when he was discussing dysfunctions based on experiences of parental role models. Although I found his division between maternal and paternal love all a little simplistic, some of this did make me question my relationships and how they may have been based on my own experiences and learnings from my parents and also to wonder about the examples I鈥檝e given my daughters. Never pleasant thoughts.
I didn鈥檛 enjoy this book nearly as much as The Art of Being, but there are more 鈥榯houghts per page鈥� here than in your typical book on this subject and if it is a 鈥榳hiteboard book鈥� it is a particularly full and rewarding one.
As I said to George 鈥� I can see why people settle for sex, rather than love. Fromm鈥檚 idea of love sounds far too hard.
This is what I would generally call a 鈥榳hite-board鈥� book. A book in which someone has picked a term rich in meaning 鈥� in this case love, but other鈥檚 I鈥檝e read have been on Lust or the parts of the human body - and run with it. Germaine Greer has one out at the moment called Rage I believe, although she could just as easily have written one called mock-outrage.
All sorts of love are covered, Brotherly Love, Romantic Love, Religious Love, Motherly Love鈥� Like I said, a white-board book where a huge mind-map has been padded out into continuous prose.
This all makes the book sound much less interesting than I actually found it 鈥� but I want to give you an idea of some of my dissatisfactions too. I mentioned that I was reading Fromm to someone at work and he asked who is Fromm. I said, 鈥淚 guess he is a bit of a Freudian鈥揗arxist with an interest in Buddhism.鈥� My friend looked at me quizzically for a moment and said, 鈥淲ell, it isn鈥檛 exactly saying, 鈥榩ick me up and read me鈥� just yet.鈥� I didn鈥檛 dare tell him what the book was called.
When I was separating from my wife a very dear friend of mine suggested that I read a book called, Pulling Your Own Strings. I worked at the City Council and had the luxury of being able to turn to the computer on my desk, order a book from the city library and have it appear on my desk the very next day. There are few nicer pleasures in life. Anyway, the book appeared and it had a rainbow in the cover鈥� I told her that I didn鈥檛 think I could read this book. The problem being that I would need to read it mostly on public transport 鈥� and a rainbow, I mean, Jesus. I said to her, 鈥淟ook, the title is bad enough, but at least I can pretend that I thought it was about masturbation, but a rainbow鈥here is no excuse for a rainbow unless the book is called something like, Classic Gay Shortstories.鈥�
There is a very similar problem with a book called, The Art of Loving. One expects it to be written by Hugh Heffner or Dr Shagalot.
The question is what is love? Is it a rather pleasant sensation or an art and therefore something one learns and gets better at over time? Fromm points out that mostly we act as if love were a sensation 鈥� something that happens to us and we have mostly no control over. We believe that love is something that just is. We can鈥檛 help who we fall in love with, we can鈥檛 help who we fall out of love with and we fundamentally believe that there is someone out there that is just right for us. There is no effort involved in loving 鈥� in fact, effort implies the two people weren鈥檛 really 鈥榤ade for each other鈥� and that effortless love is the only 鈥榬eal鈥� love. We look down on other cultures where marriages are 鈥榓rranged鈥� and although I won鈥檛 be arranging my daughters鈥� marriages, I鈥檓 not quite so smug about the 鈥榮elf-evident鈥� superiority of marrying for 鈥榣ove鈥�.
The main problem with arranged marriages, for me, is not the impossibility of love in these types of marriage 鈥� the arranged marriages I鈥檝e witnessed in my life have involved much more 鈥榗hoice鈥� than we generally consider possible in our standard Western interpretation or plots for dozens of Disney cartoons. The real problem is how women in such marriages tend to be traded like chattel. It is hard to see how this could possibly be avoided in 鈥榓rranged marriages鈥� 鈥� although, in the large grey area between the black of arranged marriages and the white of marrying for love there are 鈥榖lind dates organised by friends鈥� and 鈥榤arry anyone you can get your hands on so as not to end up on the shelf鈥� and other such shades.
One of the things I found most interesting, and perhaps one of the most illuminating ideas in the book, was his talk about the love of God. Quite early on he says, 鈥淚n conventional Western theology the attempt is made to know God by thought, to make statements about God. It is assumed that I can know God in my thought. In mysticism, which is the consequent outcome of monotheism 鈥� the attempt is given up to know God by thought, and it is replaced by the experience of union with God in which there is no more room 鈥� and no need 鈥� for knowledge about 骋辞诲.鈥�
Love for another person 鈥� particularly love for a life-partner (as I guess it would be called today) 鈥� is fairly similar to this love of God, love as atonement with God. Fromm repeatedly says that our highest desire (whether we recognise it or not) is unity with another. For Fromm this is the ground of love of all people and true love of another is premised on our being able to love everyone. There are all manner of qualifications for this unity 鈥� not unlike the line from The Prophet:
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but each one of you be alone, even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music.
The big downer 鈥� to use an Americanism 鈥� is that Fromm barely feels that true love is possible in Western Capitalist societies. Our obsession with consumerism; our ideas that love is a sensation, rather than an art; our alienation from our essential selves; our inability to concentrate and focus 鈥� all of these work against us truly 鈥榖eing鈥� in love.
This, then, is the Buddhist aspect of Fromm. The point is to learn how to be in the present 鈥� and being in the present implies truly being 鈥榳ith鈥� your partner. I think I finally got the point of sex once I realised it wasn鈥檛 about what I was feeling, but about understanding and anticipating the feelings of the person I was with. When I was too young to understand I heard Dave Allen tell a joke on TV about a newly married couple who rolled over to go to sleep rather than finish having sex after one of them asked, 鈥淐an鈥檛 you think of anyone else either?鈥� I鈥檇 have preferred to have never been old enough to understand that joke. Shakespeare makes a similar point when he has Edmund (why do his 鈥榖ad-guys鈥� so often get the best lines?) say in King Lear about the lecherous begetters of bastard children when compared to most 鈥榤arried sexual partners鈥�, 鈥淲ho, in the lusty stealth of Nature, take more composition and fierce quality than doth, within a dull, stale, tired bed, go to th鈥� creating a whole tribe of fobs got 鈥榯ween a sleep and wake?鈥�
Gods, stand up for bastards indeed.
Or as Fromm himself would have it: 鈥淭he main condition for the achievement of love is the overcoming of one鈥檚 narcissism鈥�.
But it is not just about being present in bed for Fromm. Loving is about being alive 鈥� and being alive is about being truly conscious. Fromm is concerned that many of us think life is somehow supposed to be about 鈥榬elaxing鈥� 鈥� to Fromm the only time one should relax is when one is asleep. He is a man well aware that time, and therefore life itself, is not to be wasted 鈥� that we are better to wear out than to rust.
More than once I experienced a 鈥榮hock of recognition鈥� in reading this book, particularly towards the end when he was discussing dysfunctions based on experiences of parental role models. Although I found his division between maternal and paternal love all a little simplistic, some of this did make me question my relationships and how they may have been based on my own experiences and learnings from my parents and also to wonder about the examples I鈥檝e given my daughters. Never pleasant thoughts.
I didn鈥檛 enjoy this book nearly as much as The Art of Being, but there are more 鈥榯houghts per page鈥� here than in your typical book on this subject and if it is a 鈥榳hiteboard book鈥� it is a particularly full and rewarding one.
July 2, 2016
丕賳匕丕乇
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇禺賱丕賮 丕爻賲賽 夭乇丿 賵 胤乇丕丨蹖 噩賱丿 賲夭禺乇賮賽 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 賲乇賵丕蹖丿貙 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賵噩賴 讴鬲丕亘賽 夭乇丿蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 亘乇禺賱丕賮 鬲氐賵乇 丕賵賱蹖賴貙 丿爻鬲賵乇丕賱毓賲賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 毓丕卮賯 卮丿賳 賵 賳丨賵賴卢蹖 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖貙 賳蹖爻鬲. 倬爻 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丿賳亘丕賱 趩賳丿 丿爻鬲賵乇賽 爻丕丿賴 賵 毓賲賱蹖 噩賴鬲 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖 (賲禺卢夭賳蹖) 賲蹖卢诏乇丿丿貙 賳丕丕賲蹖丿讴賳賳丿賴 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿.
乇賵丨賽 讴鬲丕亘
鬲賳賴丕 丿賴 爻丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 噩賳诏 噩賴丕賳蹖 丿賵賲貙 蹖毓賳蹖 亘毓丿 丕夭 賮乇賵乇蹖禺鬲賳 鬲賲丕賲 丌乇賲丕賳卢賴丕 賵 丕賲蹖丿賴丕 亘賴 賳蹖讴卢丕賳丿蹖卮蹖 賵 賳蹖讴卢讴乇丿丕乇蹖賽 亘卮乇貙 蹖讴 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵賽 趩倬卢诏乇丕貙 讴鬲丕亘蹖 亘丕 賲賵囟賵毓 毓卮賯 賲蹖卢賳賵蹖爻丿 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳 亘丕 丕賲蹖丿 賵 賲孬亘鬲-丕賳丿蹖卮蹖貙 亘卮乇 乇丕 亘賴 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖丿賳 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲 丕亘賳丕亍 亘卮乇 賮乇丕 賲蹖卢禺賵丕賳丿.
丕蹖賳 讴丕乇貙 毓賲賯賽 賳诏丕賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 (丕賵賲丕賳蹖爻鬲蹖) 賵 丌乇賲丕賳蹖賽 丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 乇丕 亘丕夭賲蹖卢鬲丕亘丿. 賮乇賵賲 賴賳賵夭 亘賴 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖 讴賱丕爻蹖讴蹖 趩賵賳 禺賵丿卮賳丕爻蹖貙 賳賵毓卢丿賵爻鬲蹖貙 丕蹖孬丕乇 賵 倬乇賵乇卮 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿乇賵賳蹖 丕毓鬲賯丕丿 丿丕乇丿 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭蹖 讴丕賲賱賳 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳 賴賳賵夭 禺賵卮卢亘蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵夭蹖 亘賴 賲賮賴賵賲賽 丨賯蹖賯蹖賽 毓卮賯貙 毓丕卮賯 亘丕卮丿 賵 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿. 禺賵卮卢亘蹖賳蹖卢丕蹖 讴賴 亘丕 倬卮鬲賵丕賳賴卢蹖 卮賳丕禺鬲 毓賱賲蹖 賵 丿賯蹖賯 丕賵 丕夭 爻乇卮鬲 亘卮乇 賵 丕賳鬲賯丕丿賴丕蹖 鬲賳丿 賵 爻丕夭卮-賳丕倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲. 丌蹖丕 賮乇賵賲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 賲蹖卢讴乇丿責 丌蹖丕 丕賵 氐乇賮賳 蹖讴 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖卢蹖 讴賱賴卢卮賯賽 丌乇賲丕賳卢诏乇丕爻鬲責
賮乇丕賳讴賮賵乇鬲蹖卢賴丕蹖 禺卮賳
丕賳丿蹖卮賲賳丿丕賳 賲讴鬲亘 賮乇丕賳讴賮賵乇鬲 (丕夭 噩賲賱賴 賵丕賱鬲乇 亘賳蹖丕賲蹖賳貙 賴賵乇讴賴丕蹖賲乇 賵 鬲卅賵丿賵乇 丌丿賵乇賳賵) 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿卮賲賳 禺賵賳蹖賽 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴-丿丕乇蹖 亘賵丿賳丿. 賲氐乇賮卢诏乇丕蹖蹖貙 賲丿诏乇丕蹖蹖 賵 賴丿丕蹖鬲 卮丿賳 爻賱蹖賯賴卢賴丕 鬲賵爻胤 卮乇讴鬲卢賴丕蹖 趩賳丿賲賱蹖鬲蹖貙 賳馗丕賲 賲亘丕丿賱賴卢丕蹖 讴丕賱丕貙 讴丕賱丕蹖蹖 卮丿賳 賵 丨丕讴賲蹖鬲 毓乇囟賴 賵 鬲賯丕囟丕 丿乇 鬲賲丕賲 卮卅賵賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘卮乇 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賵丿 讴賴 賴乇诏夭 鬲賵 讴賻鬲卮丕賳 賳賲蹖卢乇賮鬲. 丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 讴丕賱丕蹖蹖 賵 賯乇丕乇丿丕丿蹖 卮丿賳 賲賮賴賵賲 毓卮賯 賵 丿乇 賳鬲蹖噩賴 丕賳丨胤丕胤 賵 爻胤丨蹖 卮丿賳 丌賳 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 睾乇亘 丕賳鬲賯丕丿 賲蹖卢讴賳丿. 丕賳丨胤丕胤蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丌睾丕夭 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲賲貙 亘丕 丕卮丕卅賴卢蹖 賳馗乇蹖賴卢蹖 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵蹖 賮乇賵蹖丿 鬲賵爻胤 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 丌睾丕夭 卮丿賴 ( 鬲賯賱蹖賱 賲賮賴賵賲 毓卮賯 亘賴 乇丕亘胤賴卢蹖 噩賳爻蹖) 賵 鬲賵爻胤 賴賲讴丕乇丕賳 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻賽 賵蹖 鬲賯賵蹖鬲 賲蹖卢卮賵丿貙 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丕乇丕卅賴卢蹖 丕賱诏賵賴丕 賵 亘丕蹖丿 賵 賳亘丕蹖丿賴丕 亘乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 夭賳丕卮賵蹖蹖 倬蹖卮 賲蹖卢乇賵丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 趩丕乇趩賵亘 诏匕丕卮鬲賳 亘乇丕蹖 乇賮鬲丕乇 亘卮乇貙 蹖毓賳蹖 倬蹖卮卢亘蹖賳蹖 倬匕蹖乇 讴乇丿賳賽 丕賵貙 賴賲丕賳 禺賵丕爻鬲 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 讴賴 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲氐乇賮賽 賴乇趩賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇賽 賲丨氐賵賱丕鬲 禺賵丿 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 亘乇賳丕賲賴 亘乇蹖夭丿. 夭賳 賵 卮賵賴乇蹖 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 賴賲丿蹖诏乇 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賲噩亘賵乇賳丿 亘丕 乇毓丕蹖鬲賽 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 賵 乇爻賵賲丕鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳賴丕 鬲毓乇蹖賮 卮丿賴貙 夭賳丿诏蹖賽 禺賵丿 乇丕 鬲丨賲賱卢倬匕蹖乇 爻丕夭賳丿.
毓卮賯卢 賵乇夭蹖丿賳 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲責
賮乇賵賲 鬲氐賵乇賽 毓賲賵賲蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 毓卮賯貙 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 丕賲乇蹖 芦睾蹖乇丕乇丕丿蹖禄 賵 賳丕诏賴丕賳蹖 賵 賯丿乇鬲賲賳丿 賲蹖卢丿丕賳丿 讴賴 丌丿賲蹖 乇丕 芦丿乇诏蹖乇禄 禺賵丿 賲蹖卢讴賳丿 賵 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴 芦丕賳賮毓丕賱禄 賲蹖卢讴卮丕賳丿貙 賳賲蹖卢倬匕蹖乇丿 賵 賲毓鬲賯丿 丕爻鬲 毓卮賯 蹖讴 丕賲乇 讴丕賲賱賳 芦丌诏丕賴丕賳賴禄貙 芦丕乇丕丿蹖禄 賵 芦亘丕 鬲氐賲蹖賲禄 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丨氐賵賱 亘賴 丌賳 賵 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 賲毓卮賵賯 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 芦鬲賱丕卮禄貙 芦鬲賲乇蹖賳禄 賵 芦丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖禄 丿丕乇丿. 丕夭 賳馗乇 丕賵 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賲蹖卢禺賵丕賴丿 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿 亘丕蹖丿 丌賲丕丿诏蹖 賵 賯丿乇鬲 丕蹖賳 乇丕 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 賴賲賴卢蹖 賵噩賵丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕 乇囟丕蹖鬲 賵 卮丕丿賲丕賳蹖貙 丿乇 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇賽 胤乇賮 賲賯丕亘賱賽 禺賵丿貙 亘诏匕丕乇丿 賵 胤乇賮 賲賯丕亘賱卮 賳蹖夭 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 讴丕乇 乇丕 讴賳丿.
丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 鬲丕 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 賴賲賴卢蹖 噩賴丕賳 賵 賲毓卮賵賯 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿. 丕賵 亘丕蹖丿 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賵 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖 乇丕 賴賲丕賳賳丿 鬲賲丕賲 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘蹖丕賲賵夭丿 賵 丿乇 禺賵丿 倬乇賵乇卮 丿賴丿. 鬲賳賴丕 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘賴 亘賱賵睾賽 讴丕賲賱 乇爻蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丿蹖丿蹖 丕賳爻丕賳卢丿賵爻鬲丕賳賴 丿丕乇丿 賵 丕夭 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖卢賴丕 賵 丕丨爻丕爻 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿蹖賽 禺賵丿 乇賴丕 卮丿賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賲蹖卢鬲賵丕賳丿 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿.
丕賳賵丕毓 毓卮賯
丕夭 賯爻賲鬲卢賴丕蹖 噩匕丕亘 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵丕賳賴卢鬲乇 丕爻鬲 賵 毓卮賯 乇丕 亘賴 丕賳賵丕毓 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賯爻蹖賲 賲蹖卢讴賳丿: 毓卮賯 賲丕丿乇丕賳賴貙 毓卮賯 倬丿乇丕賳賴貙 毓卮賯 噩賳爻蹖貙 毓卮賯 亘賴 禺賵丿 賵 毓卮賯 亘賴 禺丿丕.
賳氐蹖丨鬲
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘賵 亘禺賵賳蹖丿. 禺蹖賱蹖 乇丕丨鬲 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 乇賵 亘蹖丕賳 讴乇丿賴 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 乇賵賵賳賴. 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 賲丕 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖丿賴卢丌賱卢賴丕 賵 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕卮 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖卢丿賴 賵 毓卮賯卢賴丕蹖 丨丕賱丕 賴乇趩蹖夭蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿 亘賴 噩夭 毓卮賯. 賴賲蹖卮賴 賴賲 爻賳鬲賴丕 賵 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖 賯丿蹖賲蹖 亘丿 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖賴 噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 倬丕爻丿丕乇賽 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖蹖 蹖賴 讴賴 賲賲讴賳賴 賯丿蹖賲蹖 亘賴 賳馗乇 亘乇爻賳 丕賲丕 丌乇丕賲卮卢亘禺卮賳 賵 囟乇賵乇蹖 亘乇丕蹖 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 爻乇毓鬲卢夭丿賴貙 賲囟胤乇亘貙 爻胤丨蹖 賵 賲氐乇賮卢诏乇丕蹖 賲丕. 亘丕 賵噩賵丿賽 賮丕氐賱賴卢蹖 倬賳噩丕賴 爻丕賱賴卢蹖 賮乇賵賲 亘丕 賲丕貙 丕賳诏丕乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 賲丕 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 丿丕乇蹖賲 鬲賵 賲賳丕爻亘丕鬲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 禺賮賴 賲蹖卮蹖賲.
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇禺賱丕賮 丕爻賲賽 夭乇丿 賵 胤乇丕丨蹖 噩賱丿 賲夭禺乇賮賽 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 賲乇賵丕蹖丿貙 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賵噩賴 讴鬲丕亘賽 夭乇丿蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 亘乇禺賱丕賮 鬲氐賵乇 丕賵賱蹖賴貙 丿爻鬲賵乇丕賱毓賲賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 毓丕卮賯 卮丿賳 賵 賳丨賵賴卢蹖 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖貙 賳蹖爻鬲. 倬爻 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丿賳亘丕賱 趩賳丿 丿爻鬲賵乇賽 爻丕丿賴 賵 毓賲賱蹖 噩賴鬲 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖 (賲禺卢夭賳蹖) 賲蹖卢诏乇丿丿貙 賳丕丕賲蹖丿讴賳賳丿賴 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿.
乇賵丨賽 讴鬲丕亘
鬲賳賴丕 丿賴 爻丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 噩賳诏 噩賴丕賳蹖 丿賵賲貙 蹖毓賳蹖 亘毓丿 丕夭 賮乇賵乇蹖禺鬲賳 鬲賲丕賲 丌乇賲丕賳卢賴丕 賵 丕賲蹖丿賴丕 亘賴 賳蹖讴卢丕賳丿蹖卮蹖 賵 賳蹖讴卢讴乇丿丕乇蹖賽 亘卮乇貙 蹖讴 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵賽 趩倬卢诏乇丕貙 讴鬲丕亘蹖 亘丕 賲賵囟賵毓 毓卮賯 賲蹖卢賳賵蹖爻丿 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳 亘丕 丕賲蹖丿 賵 賲孬亘鬲-丕賳丿蹖卮蹖貙 亘卮乇 乇丕 亘賴 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖丿賳 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲 丕亘賳丕亍 亘卮乇 賮乇丕 賲蹖卢禺賵丕賳丿.
丕蹖賳 讴丕乇貙 毓賲賯賽 賳诏丕賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 (丕賵賲丕賳蹖爻鬲蹖) 賵 丌乇賲丕賳蹖賽 丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 乇丕 亘丕夭賲蹖卢鬲丕亘丿. 賮乇賵賲 賴賳賵夭 亘賴 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖 讴賱丕爻蹖讴蹖 趩賵賳 禺賵丿卮賳丕爻蹖貙 賳賵毓卢丿賵爻鬲蹖貙 丕蹖孬丕乇 賵 倬乇賵乇卮 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿賴丕蹖 丿乇賵賳蹖 丕毓鬲賯丕丿 丿丕乇丿 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭蹖 讴丕賲賱賳 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳 賴賳賵夭 禺賵卮卢亘蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵夭蹖 亘賴 賲賮賴賵賲賽 丨賯蹖賯蹖賽 毓卮賯貙 毓丕卮賯 亘丕卮丿 賵 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿. 禺賵卮卢亘蹖賳蹖卢丕蹖 讴賴 亘丕 倬卮鬲賵丕賳賴卢蹖 卮賳丕禺鬲 毓賱賲蹖 賵 丿賯蹖賯 丕賵 丕夭 爻乇卮鬲 亘卮乇 賵 丕賳鬲賯丕丿賴丕蹖 鬲賳丿 賵 爻丕夭卮-賳丕倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲. 丌蹖丕 賮乇賵賲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 賲蹖卢讴乇丿責 丌蹖丕 丕賵 氐乇賮賳 蹖讴 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖卢蹖 讴賱賴卢卮賯賽 丌乇賲丕賳卢诏乇丕爻鬲責
賮乇丕賳讴賮賵乇鬲蹖卢賴丕蹖 禺卮賳
丕賳丿蹖卮賲賳丿丕賳 賲讴鬲亘 賮乇丕賳讴賮賵乇鬲 (丕夭 噩賲賱賴 賵丕賱鬲乇 亘賳蹖丕賲蹖賳貙 賴賵乇讴賴丕蹖賲乇 賵 鬲卅賵丿賵乇 丌丿賵乇賳賵) 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿卮賲賳 禺賵賳蹖賽 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴-丿丕乇蹖 亘賵丿賳丿. 賲氐乇賮卢诏乇丕蹖蹖貙 賲丿诏乇丕蹖蹖 賵 賴丿丕蹖鬲 卮丿賳 爻賱蹖賯賴卢賴丕 鬲賵爻胤 卮乇讴鬲卢賴丕蹖 趩賳丿賲賱蹖鬲蹖貙 賳馗丕賲 賲亘丕丿賱賴卢丕蹖 讴丕賱丕貙 讴丕賱丕蹖蹖 卮丿賳 賵 丨丕讴賲蹖鬲 毓乇囟賴 賵 鬲賯丕囟丕 丿乇 鬲賲丕賲 卮卅賵賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘卮乇 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賵丿 讴賴 賴乇诏夭 鬲賵 讴賻鬲卮丕賳 賳賲蹖卢乇賮鬲. 丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 讴丕賱丕蹖蹖 賵 賯乇丕乇丿丕丿蹖 卮丿賳 賲賮賴賵賲 毓卮賯 賵 丿乇 賳鬲蹖噩賴 丕賳丨胤丕胤 賵 爻胤丨蹖 卮丿賳 丌賳 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 睾乇亘 丕賳鬲賯丕丿 賲蹖卢讴賳丿. 丕賳丨胤丕胤蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丌睾丕夭 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲賲貙 亘丕 丕卮丕卅賴卢蹖 賳馗乇蹖賴卢蹖 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵蹖 賮乇賵蹖丿 鬲賵爻胤 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 丌睾丕夭 卮丿賴 ( 鬲賯賱蹖賱 賲賮賴賵賲 毓卮賯 亘賴 乇丕亘胤賴卢蹖 噩賳爻蹖) 賵 鬲賵爻胤 賴賲讴丕乇丕賳 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻賽 賵蹖 鬲賯賵蹖鬲 賲蹖卢卮賵丿貙 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丕乇丕卅賴卢蹖 丕賱诏賵賴丕 賵 亘丕蹖丿 賵 賳亘丕蹖丿賴丕 亘乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 夭賳丕卮賵蹖蹖 倬蹖卮 賲蹖卢乇賵丿. 蹖毓賳蹖 趩丕乇趩賵亘 诏匕丕卮鬲賳 亘乇丕蹖 乇賮鬲丕乇 亘卮乇貙 蹖毓賳蹖 倬蹖卮卢亘蹖賳蹖 倬匕蹖乇 讴乇丿賳賽 丕賵貙 賴賲丕賳 禺賵丕爻鬲 賳馗丕賲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 讴賴 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲氐乇賮賽 賴乇趩賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇賽 賲丨氐賵賱丕鬲 禺賵丿 亘賴 乇丕丨鬲蹖 亘乇賳丕賲賴 亘乇蹖夭丿. 夭賳 賵 卮賵賴乇蹖 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 賴賲丿蹖诏乇 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賲噩亘賵乇賳丿 亘丕 乇毓丕蹖鬲賽 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 賵 乇爻賵賲丕鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳賴丕 鬲毓乇蹖賮 卮丿賴貙 夭賳丿诏蹖賽 禺賵丿 乇丕 鬲丨賲賱卢倬匕蹖乇 爻丕夭賳丿.
毓卮賯卢 賵乇夭蹖丿賳 賴賳乇 丕爻鬲責
賮乇賵賲 鬲氐賵乇賽 毓賲賵賲蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 毓卮賯貙 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 丕賲乇蹖 芦睾蹖乇丕乇丕丿蹖禄 賵 賳丕诏賴丕賳蹖 賵 賯丿乇鬲賲賳丿 賲蹖卢丿丕賳丿 讴賴 丌丿賲蹖 乇丕 芦丿乇诏蹖乇禄 禺賵丿 賲蹖卢讴賳丿 賵 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴 芦丕賳賮毓丕賱禄 賲蹖卢讴卮丕賳丿貙 賳賲蹖卢倬匕蹖乇丿 賵 賲毓鬲賯丿 丕爻鬲 毓卮賯 蹖讴 丕賲乇 讴丕賲賱賳 芦丌诏丕賴丕賳賴禄貙 芦丕乇丕丿蹖禄 賵 芦亘丕 鬲氐賲蹖賲禄 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 丨氐賵賱 亘賴 丌賳 賵 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 賲毓卮賵賯 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 芦鬲賱丕卮禄貙 芦鬲賲乇蹖賳禄 賵 芦丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 毓卮賯卢賵乇夭蹖禄 丿丕乇丿. 丕夭 賳馗乇 丕賵 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賲蹖卢禺賵丕賴丿 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿 亘丕蹖丿 丌賲丕丿诏蹖 賵 賯丿乇鬲 丕蹖賳 乇丕 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 賴賲賴卢蹖 賵噩賵丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕 乇囟丕蹖鬲 賵 卮丕丿賲丕賳蹖貙 丿乇 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇賽 胤乇賮 賲賯丕亘賱賽 禺賵丿貙 亘诏匕丕乇丿 賵 胤乇賮 賲賯丕亘賱卮 賳蹖夭 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 讴丕乇 乇丕 讴賳丿.
丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿 鬲丕 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 賴賲賴卢蹖 噩賴丕賳 賵 賲毓卮賵賯 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿. 丕賵 亘丕蹖丿 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賵 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖 乇丕 賴賲丕賳賳丿 鬲賲丕賲 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘蹖丕賲賵夭丿 賵 丿乇 禺賵丿 倬乇賵乇卮 丿賴丿. 鬲賳賴丕 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘賴 亘賱賵睾賽 讴丕賲賱 乇爻蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丿蹖丿蹖 丕賳爻丕賳卢丿賵爻鬲丕賳賴 丿丕乇丿 賵 丕夭 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖卢賴丕 賵 丕丨爻丕爻 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿蹖賽 禺賵丿 乇賴丕 卮丿賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賲蹖卢鬲賵丕賳丿 毓卮賯 亘賵乇夭丿.
丕賳賵丕毓 毓卮賯
丕夭 賯爻賲鬲卢賴丕蹖 噩匕丕亘 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 乇賵丕賳讴丕賵丕賳賴卢鬲乇 丕爻鬲 賵 毓卮賯 乇丕 亘賴 丕賳賵丕毓 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賯爻蹖賲 賲蹖卢讴賳丿: 毓卮賯 賲丕丿乇丕賳賴貙 毓卮賯 倬丿乇丕賳賴貙 毓卮賯 噩賳爻蹖貙 毓卮賯 亘賴 禺賵丿 賵 毓卮賯 亘賴 禺丿丕.
賳氐蹖丨鬲
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘賵 亘禺賵賳蹖丿. 禺蹖賱蹖 乇丕丨鬲 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 乇賵 亘蹖丕賳 讴乇丿賴 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 乇賵賵賳賴. 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 賲丕 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖丿賴卢丌賱卢賴丕 賵 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕卮 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖卢丿賴 賵 毓卮賯卢賴丕蹖 丨丕賱丕 賴乇趩蹖夭蹖 賴爻鬲賳丿 亘賴 噩夭 毓卮賯. 賴賲蹖卮賴 賴賲 爻賳鬲賴丕 賵 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖 賯丿蹖賲蹖 亘丿 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿 賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖賴 噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 倬丕爻丿丕乇賽 丕乇夭卮卢賴丕蹖蹖 蹖賴 讴賴 賲賲讴賳賴 賯丿蹖賲蹖 亘賴 賳馗乇 亘乇爻賳 丕賲丕 丌乇丕賲卮卢亘禺卮賳 賵 囟乇賵乇蹖 亘乇丕蹖 噩丕賲毓賴卢蹖 爻乇毓鬲卢夭丿賴貙 賲囟胤乇亘貙 爻胤丨蹖 賵 賲氐乇賮卢诏乇丕蹖 賲丕. 亘丕 賵噩賵丿賽 賮丕氐賱賴卢蹖 倬賳噩丕賴 爻丕賱賴卢蹖 賮乇賵賲 亘丕 賲丕貙 丕賳诏丕乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 賲丕 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 丿丕乇蹖賲 鬲賵 賲賳丕爻亘丕鬲 爻乇賲丕蹖賴卢丿丕乇蹖 禺賮賴 賲蹖卮蹖賲.
May 31, 2013
This book confirms the idea that reading is a basic tool in the living of a good life, a better one indeed.
Reading the Art of love awoke inside me some long dormant craving to approach the subject matter of love in a Tangible and Lucid way as Fromm did.
In this book, Fromm asserts that love is essential to human flourishing and survival "love is the answer to the problem of human existence" he discusses frankly and candidly his theory of love in all its aspects: not only romantic love, so steeped in false conceptions, but also love of parents for children, brotherly love, erotic love, self-love and love for God. Learning to love, he suggests, requires care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge to master the art of love as he metaphorically puts it.
Fromm also writes about the disintegration of love in contemporary western society; he stressed tirelessly that modern Western society practices 鈥渢he socially patterned pathology of love鈥�, thus, love in the forms he describes is a relatively rare phenomenon in capitalist society, and that its place is taken by a number of forms of pseudo-love which are in reality so many forms of the disintegration of love.鈥�
In short, Erich Fromm believes that love is not a noun or object, but a verb or practice, the way you practice love depends on your approach and understanding of the existential problems of your life and at the same time, determines the wholeness you will experience as a human being. In a more practical sense, reading The Art of Loving can give you tools to help you learn the art of living as well.
鈥淟ove is a decision, it is a judgment, it is a promise. If love were only a feeling, there would be no basis for the promise to love each other forever. A feeling comes and it may go. How can I judge that it will stay forever, when my act does not involve judgment and decision.鈥�
鈥淢odern man has transformed himself into a commodity; he experiences his life energy as an investment with which he should make the highest profit, considering his position and the situation on the personality market. He is alienated from himself, from his fellow men and from nature. His main aim is a profitable exchange of his skills, knowledge, and of himself, his "personality package" with others who are equally intent on a fair and profitable exchange. Life has no goal except the one to move, no principle except the one of fair exchange, no satisfaction except the one to consume.鈥�
Reading the Art of love awoke inside me some long dormant craving to approach the subject matter of love in a Tangible and Lucid way as Fromm did.
In this book, Fromm asserts that love is essential to human flourishing and survival "love is the answer to the problem of human existence" he discusses frankly and candidly his theory of love in all its aspects: not only romantic love, so steeped in false conceptions, but also love of parents for children, brotherly love, erotic love, self-love and love for God. Learning to love, he suggests, requires care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge to master the art of love as he metaphorically puts it.
Fromm also writes about the disintegration of love in contemporary western society; he stressed tirelessly that modern Western society practices 鈥渢he socially patterned pathology of love鈥�, thus, love in the forms he describes is a relatively rare phenomenon in capitalist society, and that its place is taken by a number of forms of pseudo-love which are in reality so many forms of the disintegration of love.鈥�
In short, Erich Fromm believes that love is not a noun or object, but a verb or practice, the way you practice love depends on your approach and understanding of the existential problems of your life and at the same time, determines the wholeness you will experience as a human being. In a more practical sense, reading The Art of Loving can give you tools to help you learn the art of living as well.
鈥淟ove is a decision, it is a judgment, it is a promise. If love were only a feeling, there would be no basis for the promise to love each other forever. A feeling comes and it may go. How can I judge that it will stay forever, when my act does not involve judgment and decision.鈥�
鈥淢odern man has transformed himself into a commodity; he experiences his life energy as an investment with which he should make the highest profit, considering his position and the situation on the personality market. He is alienated from himself, from his fellow men and from nature. His main aim is a profitable exchange of his skills, knowledge, and of himself, his "personality package" with others who are equally intent on a fair and profitable exchange. Life has no goal except the one to move, no principle except the one of fair exchange, no satisfaction except the one to consume.鈥�
August 13, 2016
賷購毓乇賽賾賮 廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 丕賱丨亘 賮賶 賰鬲丕亘賴 :
"亘兀賳賴 賱賷爻 毓賱丕賯丞 亘卮禺氐 賲毓賷賳
亘賱 賴賵 賲賵賯賮 賷丨丿丿 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱卮禺氐 亘丕賱毓丕賱賲 賰賰賱
賵賱賷爻 鬲噩丕賴 賲賵囟賵毓 賵丕丨丿 賱賱丨亘."
賷賯賵賱 廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 廿賳 丕賱毓賳丕氐乇 丕賱乇卅賷爻丞 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 賴賷 兀乇亘毓丞:
丕賱乇毓丕賷丞:
賮丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 丕賱賮毓丕賱 亘賳賲賵 賵丨賷丕丞 匕賱賰 丕賱匕賷 賳丨亘賴.
丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷丞:
兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賯丕丿乇丕賸 賵賲爻鬲毓丿丕賸 賱兀賳 鬲爻鬲噩賷亘 賱丨丕噩丕鬲 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳
爻賵丕亍 毓亘乇賵丕 毓賳賴丕 兀賲 賱賲 賷毓亘乇賵丕.
丕賱丕丨鬲乇丕賲:
賵賴賵 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 乇丐賷丞 丕賱卮禺氐 賰賲丕 賴賵 賵廿丿乇丕賰 賮乇丿丕賳賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賮乇丿丞
兀賷 鬲賯亘賱 丕賱丌禺乇 賰賲丕 賴賵 毓賱賶 毓賷賵亘賴 丿賵賳 兀賳 賳賮乇囟 毓賱賷賴 兀賷 鬲睾賷賷乇.
丕賱賲毓乇賮丞:
賵賴賵 噩丕賳亘 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賷鬲賵賯賮 毓賳丿 丕賱賲丨賷胤 亘賱 賷賳賮匕 廿賱賶 丕賱賱亘
兀賷 兀賳 鬲乇賶 賲丨亘賵亘賰 賮賷 丿丕禺賱 賳賮爻賴 賵鬲鬲賮賴賲 胤亘賷毓鬲賴 賵胤乇賷賯丞 鬲賮賰賷乇賴.
賷賵囟丨 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賳 賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻鬲 卮毓賵乇丕賸 禺賮賷丕賸 賷賳鬲丕亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 亘毓賷丿丕賸 毓賳 賲爻鬲賵賶 賵毓賷賴貙 亘賱 丕賱毓賰爻貙 廿匕 廿賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲噩丕乇亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 鬲賮卮賱 廿匕丕 賱賲 賷胤賲丨 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 睾賱賶 鬲胤賵賷乇 匕丕鬲賴 亘卮賰賱 賰賱賷 賵賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷鬲賲鬲毓 亘丕賱丨亘 賲丕 賱賲 賷鬲丨賱賶 亘丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲.
丕爻賲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯丿 賷賵丨賷 亘爻賷胤乇丞 兀賮賰丕乇 賵賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓賱賷賴貙
賱賰賳 丕乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 賷賵囟丨 賱賳丕 賲毓賳賶 丕賱丨亘 亘胤乇賷賯丞 毓賯賱丕賳賷丞 賮賱爻賮賷丞.
爻鬲賰賵賳 賯乇丕亍丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲賱賷卅丞 亘禺賷亘丞 丕賱兀賲賱 賱兀賷 廿賳爻丕賳 賷鬲賵賯毓 鬲毓賱賷賲丕鬲 爻賴賱丞 賮賷 賮賳 丕賱丨亘貙 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘- 亘丕賱毓賰爻- 賷乇賷丿 兀賳 賷亘賷賳 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 廿丨爻丕爻丕 毓丕胤賮賷丕 賷賲賰賳 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷賳睾賲乇 賮賷賴 亘爻賴賵賱丞 賲賳 賯亘賱 兀賷 廿賳爻丕賳 亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱賳囟噩 丕賱匕賷 賵氐賱 廿賱賷賴.
"亘兀賳賴 賱賷爻 毓賱丕賯丞 亘卮禺氐 賲毓賷賳
亘賱 賴賵 賲賵賯賮 賷丨丿丿 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱卮禺氐 亘丕賱毓丕賱賲 賰賰賱
賵賱賷爻 鬲噩丕賴 賲賵囟賵毓 賵丕丨丿 賱賱丨亘."
賷賯賵賱 廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 廿賳 丕賱毓賳丕氐乇 丕賱乇卅賷爻丞 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 賴賷 兀乇亘毓丞:
丕賱乇毓丕賷丞:
賮丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 丕賱賮毓丕賱 亘賳賲賵 賵丨賷丕丞 匕賱賰 丕賱匕賷 賳丨亘賴.
丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷丞:
兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賯丕丿乇丕賸 賵賲爻鬲毓丿丕賸 賱兀賳 鬲爻鬲噩賷亘 賱丨丕噩丕鬲 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳
爻賵丕亍 毓亘乇賵丕 毓賳賴丕 兀賲 賱賲 賷毓亘乇賵丕.
丕賱丕丨鬲乇丕賲:
賵賴賵 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 乇丐賷丞 丕賱卮禺氐 賰賲丕 賴賵 賵廿丿乇丕賰 賮乇丿丕賳賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賮乇丿丞
兀賷 鬲賯亘賱 丕賱丌禺乇 賰賲丕 賴賵 毓賱賶 毓賷賵亘賴 丿賵賳 兀賳 賳賮乇囟 毓賱賷賴 兀賷 鬲睾賷賷乇.
丕賱賲毓乇賮丞:
賵賴賵 噩丕賳亘 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賷鬲賵賯賮 毓賳丿 丕賱賲丨賷胤 亘賱 賷賳賮匕 廿賱賶 丕賱賱亘
兀賷 兀賳 鬲乇賶 賲丨亘賵亘賰 賮賷 丿丕禺賱 賳賮爻賴 賵鬲鬲賮賴賲 胤亘賷毓鬲賴 賵胤乇賷賯丞 鬲賮賰賷乇賴.
賷賵囟丨 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賳 賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻鬲 卮毓賵乇丕賸 禺賮賷丕賸 賷賳鬲丕亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 亘毓賷丿丕賸 毓賳 賲爻鬲賵賶 賵毓賷賴貙 亘賱 丕賱毓賰爻貙 廿匕 廿賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲噩丕乇亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 鬲賮卮賱 廿匕丕 賱賲 賷胤賲丨 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 睾賱賶 鬲胤賵賷乇 匕丕鬲賴 亘卮賰賱 賰賱賷 賵賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷鬲賲鬲毓 亘丕賱丨亘 賲丕 賱賲 賷鬲丨賱賶 亘丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲.
丕爻賲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯丿 賷賵丨賷 亘爻賷胤乇丞 兀賮賰丕乇 賵賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓賱賷賴貙
賱賰賳 丕乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 賷賵囟丨 賱賳丕 賲毓賳賶 丕賱丨亘 亘胤乇賷賯丞 毓賯賱丕賳賷丞 賮賱爻賮賷丞.
爻鬲賰賵賳 賯乇丕亍丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲賱賷卅丞 亘禺賷亘丞 丕賱兀賲賱 賱兀賷 廿賳爻丕賳 賷鬲賵賯毓 鬲毓賱賷賲丕鬲 爻賴賱丞 賮賷 賮賳 丕賱丨亘貙 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘- 亘丕賱毓賰爻- 賷乇賷丿 兀賳 賷亘賷賳 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 廿丨爻丕爻丕 毓丕胤賮賷丕 賷賲賰賳 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷賳睾賲乇 賮賷賴 亘爻賴賵賱丞 賲賳 賯亘賱 兀賷 廿賳爻丕賳 亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱賳囟噩 丕賱匕賷 賵氐賱 廿賱賷賴.
October 16, 2020
乇睾賲 氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱氐睾賷乇丞 丕賱丕 兀賳賴 丕胤賵賱 賰鬲丕亘 丕爻鬲睾乇賯鬲 賮賷 賯乇丕卅鬲賴 賱丿賯丞 賲毓丕賳賷賴 賵 乇睾亘鬲賷 賮賷 丕賱廿爻鬲賲丕毓 賵 賮賴賲 賰賱 賮氐賱 毓賱賶 丨丿丞
:賷鬲賰賵賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賳 兀乇亘毓 賮氐賵賱 :
鈻� 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀賵賱 : 賲丕賴賵 丕賱丨亘責
賴賱 賴賵 賮賳 丕賲 賲噩乇丿 毓賲賱 賱丕 廿乇丕丿賷 賵 賯丿乇責
賷亘乇夭 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 鬲胤賵乇 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨亘 毓亘乇 丕賱毓氐賵乇 賲賳 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱賮賰鬲賵乇賷 廿賱賶 賯乇賳 丕賱毓卮乇賷賳 賵 賰賷賮 賷鬲卮賰賱 丨爻亘 毓氐乇賴
鈻� 賮賮賷 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱賮賰鬲賵乇賷 丕賱賲賱鬲夭賲 亘丕賱賯賵丕賳賷賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賴賳丕賰 丨丿賷孬 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 賰丕賳鬲 賴賳丕賰 卮乇賵胤 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賵 賲氐丕賱丨 兀爻乇賷丞 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 孬賲 丕賱丨亘.
賵 賰丕賱孬賵乇丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳馗賵賲丞 噩丕亍鬲 丕賱丨乇亘 丕賱毓丕賱賲賷丞 丕賱丕賵賱賶 賵 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賵 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 亘毓丿賴丕 賱賱鬲乇爻賷禺 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨乇賷丞 賮賷 廿禺鬲賷丕乇 丕賱丨亘
賱賰賳 賴賳丕 賷胤乇丨 毓丕賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱丕賱賲丕賳賷" 廿乇賷賰" 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賵賯毓 賮賷賴丕 匕賱賰 丕賱噩賷賱 賵鬲爻鬲賲乇 廿賱賶 丕賱丌賳
猬咃笍 兀賳賴賲 廿賳卮睾賱賵丕 亘賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賵馗賷賮丞 丕賱丨亘
丕賷 丕賳賴 賱賰賷 鬲賰賵賳 賲丨亘賵亘丕 賷噩亘 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賲卮賴賵乇丕 賵 睾賳賷
賵 噩匕丕亘丕 賵 賵爻賷賲丕賸 賵賱賲 賷賴鬲賲賵丕 亘賵馗賷賮丞 丕賱丨亘 賱丿賶 丕乇賷賰
鈿狅笍"丿賮毓 賴丕噩爻 丕賱賵丨丿丞 賮賷 賲賵丕噩賴丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲"
賵 匕賱賰 賲丕 賷賮爻乇 丕賳 丕賱噩賲賷毓 丕氐亘丨 賷亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲賳丕爻亘 賰賷 丕丨亘 兀賶 賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘貙
鈻з勝佖蒂� 丕賱孬丕賳賷 : 賮賳 丕賱丨亘:
賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賷賯丿賲 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘 賵賴賷 :
丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷: 丕賵 丕賱噩賳爻賷
丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀賲賵賲賷
丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕亘賵亘賷
丨亘 丕賱賱賴
丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕禺賵賷 賵 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲.
賲毓 丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 賮賷 賰賱 賳賵毓 毓賱賶 丨丿賴
賷毓鬲亘乇 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀胤賵賱 賵 丕賰孬乇 鬲卮毓亘丕 賱鬲賵爻毓賴 賮賷 囟乇亘 丕賱丕賲孬丕賱 賵賷賳鬲賯丿 乇丐賷丞 賮乇賵賷丿 賱賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 賯夭賲賴 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賶.
賷胤乇丨 亘卮賰賱 賲賮氐賱 賰賷賮賷丞 賰卮賮 賰賱 賳賵毓 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕卮賰丕賱 賮丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕賲賵賲賷 賲孬賱丕 :
丕賷 鬲毓賱賯 丕賱丕賲 亘胤賮賱 賷胤乇丨 賮賷賴 賱賱賲乇丞 丕賵賱賶 賵 亘賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱噩乇亍丞 賮賰乇丞 丕賳 卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱兀賲 鬲丐孬乇 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賲賵 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賵 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷 賱賱胤賮賱 :
猬咃笍 賮丕賱兀賲 丕賱賲鬲賵鬲乇丞 丕賱賰丕乇賴丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞 爻鬲賳賯賱 匕賱賰 賱兀胤賮丕賱賴丕
賱丕賳 賱丿賷賴丕 噩賳丕丨賷賳 丕賱丨賲丕賷丞 賵 丕賱丨亘 賵 賷賯氐丿 亘賴 丨亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 卮亘賴賴 亘丕賱毓爻賱 賵 丕賱賱亘賳
賮丕賱賱亘賳 丕賱丨賲丕賷丞 賵 丕賱毓爻賱 丨亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 丨亘 匕丕鬲賴丕.
亘賳賮爻 丕賱丿賯丞 賵鬲賮氐賷賱 賷毓丕賱噩 亘丕賯賷 兀氐賳丕賮 丕賱丨亘 賲賯丿賲丕 丕賱丕賲孬賱丞 賵 賲爻鬲卮賴丿丕 亘丕賱鬲賵丕乇丞 賵丕賱廿賳噩賷賱 丕丨賷丕賳丕
( 賵匕賱賰 丕賱卮卅 丕賱匕賷 兀賯賱賯賳賷 賵 丕夭毓丨賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 毓賱賲丕 丕賳 賳氐賵氐 賲丨乇賮丞).
乇賰夭 賰匕賱賰 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇賯 亘賷賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵丕賱丕賳丕賳賷丞 兀賵 丕賱賳乇噩爻賷丞
鈻� 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬: 丕賱丨亘 賵 鬲賮賰賰 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱睾乇亘賷:
賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賷亘乇夭 賰賷賮賷丞 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱丨亘 亘賮賰乇丞 丕賱毓乇囟 賵丕賱胤賱亘 賮賷 丕賱爻賵賯貙
賮兀氐亘丨鬲 卮禺氐賷丞 賰賱 卮禺氐賺 鬲鬲卮賰賱 丨爻亘 胤賱亘丕鬲 丕賱爻賵賯貙兀賷 廿匕丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱賲賵囟丞 卮禺氐丕賸 噩匕丕亘丕 賵賲鬲爻丕賲丨丕 賵 賲丨亘丕 鬲胤亘毓 亘匕賱賰 賵 賷鬲丨賵賱 丨爻亘 賲鬲胤賱亘丕鬲 丕賱毓氐乇
賰匕賱賰 賷亘賷賳 兀賳 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱賲爻鬲賴賱賰丞
丕氐亘丨鬲 丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱噩丕賴夭丞 賮賱丕 丕丨丿 賷賮賰乇 丕賮賰丕乇 賲爻鬲賯賱丞 賷賳鬲賯丿 賴賳丕 猬咃笍 賱丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇賵噩 賱賳賵毓 賲毓賷賳 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 兀胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴 廿爻賲 "賮乇賷賯" 賮賷 丕賱夭賵丕噩 .
丕賱賮氐賱 賲鬲賲賷夭 睾賳賷 亘丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 賱丕 毓賱賶 丕賱丨亘 賮賯胤 亘賱 廿賳胤賱賯 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 賱賷賳賯丿 賵 賷賳賯賱 胤乇賷賯丞 毓賷卮 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱睾乇亘賷 賮賷 毓氐乇 丕賱鬲胤賵乇 丕賱鬲賰賳賵賱賵噩賷 賵 賳賴賲賴 丕賱廿爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷 賵 賮乇丕睾賴 丕賱乇賵丨賷 賵 賰爻賱賴.
鈻з勝佖蒂� 丕賱乇丕亘毓: 賲賲丕乇爻丞 丕賱丨亘
亘廿毓鬲亘丕乇 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳 賮賲孬賱 兀賷 賮賳 賴賳丕賰 賯賵丕毓丿 賵 鬲賲丕乇賷賳 賱賱賲賲丕乇爻鬲賴 貙賴賷 猬咃笍:丕賱氐亘乇 賵 丕賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵 丕賱賯賵丕毓丿 丕賱丕賵賱賷丞.
孬丕賱孬丕:
賷噩亘 丕賱鬲賳賵賷賴 丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賷爻 賲賳 賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賵 賱賷爻 賮賷賴 賯賵丕毓丿 賰賷 鬲丨亘 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱丌禺乇 丕賵 賰賷賮 鬲賮賴賲 亘賱 賴丿賮 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賵丨賷丿 賴賵 鬲賵囟賷丨 賮賰乇丞 丕賱丨亘 鈿狅笍 賵 丕賱兀賴賲 丿丨囟 3 兀賮賰丕乇:
1/ 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 丨丿爻 賵 賲賯賵賱丞 "丨亘 賲賳 丕賵賱 賳馗乇丞 丕賵 賵賯賵毓 賮賷 丕賱丨亘"
2/ 丕賱丿賮丕毓 毓賱賶 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷 賰賲丕 丿毓鬲 廿賱賷賴 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱爻賲丕賵賷丞 賵 廿賱睾丕亍 丕賱兀賳丕賳賷丞
3/ 丕賱鬲兀賰賷丿 毓賱賶 賮賰乇丞 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵 鬲鬲賯亘賱 賳賮爻賰 賵 鬲鬲毓賱賲 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 爻毓賷丿丕 賵 丕賳鬲 賲爻鬲賯賱 亘匕丕鬲賰 賰賷 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱丌禺乇.
兀禺賷乇丕 賱睾丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賱爻賱丞 賵 亘爻賷胤丞 乇睾賲 廿爻鬲毓賲丕賱賴 賱賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞 廿賱丕 丕賳賴 賷賮爻乇賴丕 亘囟乇亘 兀賲孬丕賱 賵 丨鬲賶 賮賷 賳賯丿賴 賱賮乇賵賷丿 賰丕賳 賲賵囟賵毓賷丕.
賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓
賷毓鬲亘乇 賲賳 兀賮囟賱 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇卅賴丕 賴匕賴 丕賱爻賳丞 賵 胤賷賱丞 毓丿丞 爻賳賷賳
Mars 2018馃尭
:賷鬲賰賵賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賳 兀乇亘毓 賮氐賵賱 :
鈻� 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀賵賱 : 賲丕賴賵 丕賱丨亘責
賴賱 賴賵 賮賳 丕賲 賲噩乇丿 毓賲賱 賱丕 廿乇丕丿賷 賵 賯丿乇責
賷亘乇夭 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 鬲胤賵乇 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨亘 毓亘乇 丕賱毓氐賵乇 賲賳 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱賮賰鬲賵乇賷 廿賱賶 賯乇賳 丕賱毓卮乇賷賳 賵 賰賷賮 賷鬲卮賰賱 丨爻亘 毓氐乇賴
鈻� 賮賮賷 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱賮賰鬲賵乇賷 丕賱賲賱鬲夭賲 亘丕賱賯賵丕賳賷賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賴賳丕賰 丨丿賷孬 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 賰丕賳鬲 賴賳丕賰 卮乇賵胤 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賵 賲氐丕賱丨 兀爻乇賷丞 賲卮鬲乇賰丞 孬賲 丕賱丨亘.
賵 賰丕賱孬賵乇丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳馗賵賲丞 噩丕亍鬲 丕賱丨乇亘 丕賱毓丕賱賲賷丞 丕賱丕賵賱賶 賵 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賵 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 亘毓丿賴丕 賱賱鬲乇爻賷禺 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨乇賷丞 賮賷 廿禺鬲賷丕乇 丕賱丨亘
賱賰賳 賴賳丕 賷胤乇丨 毓丕賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱丕賱賲丕賳賷" 廿乇賷賰" 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賵賯毓 賮賷賴丕 匕賱賰 丕賱噩賷賱 賵鬲爻鬲賲乇 廿賱賶 丕賱丌賳
猬咃笍 兀賳賴賲 廿賳卮睾賱賵丕 亘賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘 賱丕 賵馗賷賮丞 丕賱丨亘
丕賷 丕賳賴 賱賰賷 鬲賰賵賳 賲丨亘賵亘丕 賷噩亘 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 賲卮賴賵乇丕 賵 睾賳賷
賵 噩匕丕亘丕 賵 賵爻賷賲丕賸 賵賱賲 賷賴鬲賲賵丕 亘賵馗賷賮丞 丕賱丨亘 賱丿賶 丕乇賷賰
鈿狅笍"丿賮毓 賴丕噩爻 丕賱賵丨丿丞 賮賷 賲賵丕噩賴丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲"
賵 匕賱賰 賲丕 賷賮爻乇 丕賳 丕賱噩賲賷毓 丕氐亘丨 賷亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲賳丕爻亘 賰賷 丕丨亘 兀賶 賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘貙
鈻з勝佖蒂� 丕賱孬丕賳賷 : 賮賳 丕賱丨亘:
賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賷賯丿賲 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘 賵賴賷 :
丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷: 丕賵 丕賱噩賳爻賷
丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀賲賵賲賷
丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕亘賵亘賷
丨亘 丕賱賱賴
丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕禺賵賷 賵 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲.
賲毓 丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 賮賷 賰賱 賳賵毓 毓賱賶 丨丿賴
賷毓鬲亘乇 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀胤賵賱 賵 丕賰孬乇 鬲卮毓亘丕 賱鬲賵爻毓賴 賮賷 囟乇亘 丕賱丕賲孬丕賱 賵賷賳鬲賯丿 乇丐賷丞 賮乇賵賷丿 賱賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 賯夭賲賴 賮賷 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賶.
賷胤乇丨 亘卮賰賱 賲賮氐賱 賰賷賮賷丞 賰卮賮 賰賱 賳賵毓 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕卮賰丕賱 賮丕賱丨亘 丕賱丕賲賵賲賷 賲孬賱丕 :
丕賷 鬲毓賱賯 丕賱丕賲 亘胤賮賱 賷胤乇丨 賮賷賴 賱賱賲乇丞 丕賵賱賶 賵 亘賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱噩乇亍丞 賮賰乇丞 丕賳 卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱兀賲 鬲丐孬乇 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賲賵 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賵 丕賱毓丕胤賮賷 賱賱胤賮賱 :
猬咃笍 賮丕賱兀賲 丕賱賲鬲賵鬲乇丞 丕賱賰丕乇賴丞 賱賱丨賷丕丞 爻鬲賳賯賱 匕賱賰 賱兀胤賮丕賱賴丕
賱丕賳 賱丿賷賴丕 噩賳丕丨賷賳 丕賱丨賲丕賷丞 賵 丕賱丨亘 賵 賷賯氐丿 亘賴 丨亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 卮亘賴賴 亘丕賱毓爻賱 賵 丕賱賱亘賳
賮丕賱賱亘賳 丕賱丨賲丕賷丞 賵 丕賱毓爻賱 丨亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 丨亘 匕丕鬲賴丕.
亘賳賮爻 丕賱丿賯丞 賵鬲賮氐賷賱 賷毓丕賱噩 亘丕賯賷 兀氐賳丕賮 丕賱丨亘 賲賯丿賲丕 丕賱丕賲孬賱丞 賵 賲爻鬲卮賴丿丕 亘丕賱鬲賵丕乇丞 賵丕賱廿賳噩賷賱 丕丨賷丕賳丕
( 賵匕賱賰 丕賱卮卅 丕賱匕賷 兀賯賱賯賳賷 賵 丕夭毓丨賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 毓賱賲丕 丕賳 賳氐賵氐 賲丨乇賮丞).
乇賰夭 賰匕賱賰 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇賯 亘賷賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵丕賱丕賳丕賳賷丞 兀賵 丕賱賳乇噩爻賷丞
鈻� 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬: 丕賱丨亘 賵 鬲賮賰賰 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱睾乇亘賷:
賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賷亘乇夭 賰賷賮賷丞 鬲兀孬乇 丕賱丨亘 亘賮賰乇丞 丕賱毓乇囟 賵丕賱胤賱亘 賮賷 丕賱爻賵賯貙
賮兀氐亘丨鬲 卮禺氐賷丞 賰賱 卮禺氐賺 鬲鬲卮賰賱 丨爻亘 胤賱亘丕鬲 丕賱爻賵賯貙兀賷 廿匕丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱賲賵囟丞 卮禺氐丕賸 噩匕丕亘丕 賵賲鬲爻丕賲丨丕 賵 賲丨亘丕 鬲胤亘毓 亘匕賱賰 賵 賷鬲丨賵賱 丨爻亘 賲鬲胤賱亘丕鬲 丕賱毓氐乇
賰匕賱賰 賷亘賷賳 兀賳 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱賲爻鬲賴賱賰丞
丕氐亘丨鬲 丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱噩丕賴夭丞 賮賱丕 丕丨丿 賷賮賰乇 丕賮賰丕乇 賲爻鬲賯賱丞 賷賳鬲賯丿 賴賳丕 猬咃笍 賱丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇賵噩 賱賳賵毓 賲毓賷賳 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 兀胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴 廿爻賲 "賮乇賷賯" 賮賷 丕賱夭賵丕噩 .
丕賱賮氐賱 賲鬲賲賷夭 睾賳賷 亘丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 賱丕 毓賱賶 丕賱丨亘 賮賯胤 亘賱 廿賳胤賱賯 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 賱賷賳賯丿 賵 賷賳賯賱 胤乇賷賯丞 毓賷卮 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱睾乇亘賷 賮賷 毓氐乇 丕賱鬲胤賵乇 丕賱鬲賰賳賵賱賵噩賷 賵 賳賴賲賴 丕賱廿爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷 賵 賮乇丕睾賴 丕賱乇賵丨賷 賵 賰爻賱賴.
鈻з勝佖蒂� 丕賱乇丕亘毓: 賲賲丕乇爻丞 丕賱丨亘
亘廿毓鬲亘丕乇 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳 賮賲孬賱 兀賷 賮賳 賴賳丕賰 賯賵丕毓丿 賵 鬲賲丕乇賷賳 賱賱賲賲丕乇爻鬲賴 貙賴賷 猬咃笍:丕賱氐亘乇 賵 丕賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵 丕賱賯賵丕毓丿 丕賱丕賵賱賷丞.
孬丕賱孬丕:
賷噩亘 丕賱鬲賳賵賷賴 丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賷爻 賲賳 賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賳賲賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賵 賱賷爻 賮賷賴 賯賵丕毓丿 賰賷 鬲丨亘 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱丌禺乇 丕賵 賰賷賮 鬲賮賴賲 亘賱 賴丿賮 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賵丨賷丿 賴賵 鬲賵囟賷丨 賮賰乇丞 丕賱丨亘 鈿狅笍 賵 丕賱兀賴賲 丿丨囟 3 兀賮賰丕乇:
1/ 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 丨丿爻 賵 賲賯賵賱丞 "丨亘 賲賳 丕賵賱 賳馗乇丞 丕賵 賵賯賵毓 賮賷 丕賱丨亘"
2/ 丕賱丿賮丕毓 毓賱賶 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷 賰賲丕 丿毓鬲 廿賱賷賴 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱爻賲丕賵賷丞 賵 廿賱睾丕亍 丕賱兀賳丕賳賷丞
3/ 丕賱鬲兀賰賷丿 毓賱賶 賮賰乇丞 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵 鬲鬲賯亘賱 賳賮爻賰 賵 鬲鬲毓賱賲 丕賳 鬲賰賵賳 爻毓賷丿丕 賵 丕賳鬲 賲爻鬲賯賱 亘匕丕鬲賰 賰賷 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱丌禺乇.
兀禺賷乇丕 賱睾丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賱爻賱丞 賵 亘爻賷胤丞 乇睾賲 廿爻鬲毓賲丕賱賴 賱賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞 廿賱丕 丕賳賴 賷賮爻乇賴丕 亘囟乇亘 兀賲孬丕賱 賵 丨鬲賶 賮賷 賳賯丿賴 賱賮乇賵賷丿 賰丕賳 賲賵囟賵毓賷丕.
賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓
賷毓鬲亘乇 賲賳 兀賮囟賱 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇卅賴丕 賴匕賴 丕賱爻賳丞 賵 胤賷賱丞 毓丿丞 爻賳賷賳
Mars 2018馃尭
June 28, 2021
To Fromm, the fundamental problem of human existence is separateness and that the self is consciously aware of the separateness it feels from others, from nature. Modern capitalist society that prioritises exchange value, further exacerbates the alienation we feel and we centre our lives around our attempts to annihilate this alienation - Fromm writes that we sometimes pursue orgiastic states that are violent, occur in the total personality, are transitory and periodical or we probe into the nucleus of the other, into the secret of their soul and this normally takes the form of trying to hold power over the other.
Led by the false belief that love is constituted in the object and not by the faculty, our attempts to annihilate alienation are based on the same patterns that govern the commodity and labour market. We commodify our love lives and view the desired in terms of the benefits they can provide for us. Our drive to escape the unbearable prison of our existence is derived from what Fromm calls 'the personality market' and our definitions of love relations entails elimination of personhood from the person.
Fromm writes that love must be practiced like an art and that it must be disciplined. In ways that stay true to the self-help like title of the book, Fromm advocates self-love that is the opposite of selfishness. To him, genuine love must contain care, respect, responsibility and knowledge of the self and the other. He also writes that love can only be possible as a center to center relationship, that each one of us must experience ourselves from the centers of our existence.
I liked Fromm's writing on how projection of one's problems on their children and parental disputes can traumatize children. Fromm extrapolates Jungian archetypes and Freudian analysis (while criticizing Freud himself) in his categorising of love and lays a disproportionate emphasis on motherly love over fatherly love. But, as I read in an article recently, almost all psychology research was about mothers up until roughly two decades ago, when we discovered fathers. And this book was originally published in 1956 and Fromm's take on Freud applies to Fromm too, his thinking was constrained by the material conditions of his time.
Led by the false belief that love is constituted in the object and not by the faculty, our attempts to annihilate alienation are based on the same patterns that govern the commodity and labour market. We commodify our love lives and view the desired in terms of the benefits they can provide for us. Our drive to escape the unbearable prison of our existence is derived from what Fromm calls 'the personality market' and our definitions of love relations entails elimination of personhood from the person.
Fromm writes that love must be practiced like an art and that it must be disciplined. In ways that stay true to the self-help like title of the book, Fromm advocates self-love that is the opposite of selfishness. To him, genuine love must contain care, respect, responsibility and knowledge of the self and the other. He also writes that love can only be possible as a center to center relationship, that each one of us must experience ourselves from the centers of our existence.
I liked Fromm's writing on how projection of one's problems on their children and parental disputes can traumatize children. Fromm extrapolates Jungian archetypes and Freudian analysis (while criticizing Freud himself) in his categorising of love and lays a disproportionate emphasis on motherly love over fatherly love. But, as I read in an article recently, almost all psychology research was about mothers up until roughly two decades ago, when we discovered fathers. And this book was originally published in 1956 and Fromm's take on Freud applies to Fromm too, his thinking was constrained by the material conditions of his time.
May 8, 2015
3.5 stars
"Love is an activity, not a passive affect; it is a 'standing in,' not a 'falling for.' In the most general way, the active character of love can be described by stating that love is primarily giving, not receiving."
Thank goodness this book exists. Often in contemporary society we misconstrue love as a cure-all for all of our problems: instead of learning the art of love, which requires great depth and practice, we resort to insta-love, to using others to complete ourselves, and to projecting our own insecurities onto the people around us. In his book The Art of Loving, Fromm deconstructs the shallow image of love so many people possess, and he delves into what constitutes true love: care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge. Another quote that stood out to me and will remain one of my favorites:
"Love is possible only if two persons communicate with each other from the center of their existence, hence if each one of them experiences himself from the center of his existence. Only in this 'central experience' is human reality, only here is aliveness, only here is the basis for love. Love, experienced thus, is a constant challenge; it is not a resting place, but a moving, growing, working together; even whether there is harmony or conflict, joy or sadness, is secondary to the fundamental fact that two people experience themselves from the essence of their existence, that they are one with each other by being one with themselves, rather than by fleeing from themselves. There is only one proof for the presence of love: the depth of the relationship, and the aliveness and strength in each person concerned; this is the fruit by which love is recognized."
While this book contains a ton of eye-opening insight, I did not agree with all of its ideas, in particular the concepts it drew from exclusive heterosexual relationships and religion. I understand that The Art of Loving came out in 1956, which may explain its arguments that homosexuality suffers from the pain of never-resolved separateness, or that we must equal love of God with love of man. Still, these parts of the book clouded the rest of its conviction and radiance, which saddened me because Fromm combined theories from history, philosophy, religion, and more.
Overall, recommended to those interested in love or psychology. While my rating might look a little low, I believe that reading this book could change many people's lives for the better.
"Love is an activity, not a passive affect; it is a 'standing in,' not a 'falling for.' In the most general way, the active character of love can be described by stating that love is primarily giving, not receiving."
Thank goodness this book exists. Often in contemporary society we misconstrue love as a cure-all for all of our problems: instead of learning the art of love, which requires great depth and practice, we resort to insta-love, to using others to complete ourselves, and to projecting our own insecurities onto the people around us. In his book The Art of Loving, Fromm deconstructs the shallow image of love so many people possess, and he delves into what constitutes true love: care, responsibility, respect, and knowledge. Another quote that stood out to me and will remain one of my favorites:
"Love is possible only if two persons communicate with each other from the center of their existence, hence if each one of them experiences himself from the center of his existence. Only in this 'central experience' is human reality, only here is aliveness, only here is the basis for love. Love, experienced thus, is a constant challenge; it is not a resting place, but a moving, growing, working together; even whether there is harmony or conflict, joy or sadness, is secondary to the fundamental fact that two people experience themselves from the essence of their existence, that they are one with each other by being one with themselves, rather than by fleeing from themselves. There is only one proof for the presence of love: the depth of the relationship, and the aliveness and strength in each person concerned; this is the fruit by which love is recognized."
While this book contains a ton of eye-opening insight, I did not agree with all of its ideas, in particular the concepts it drew from exclusive heterosexual relationships and religion. I understand that The Art of Loving came out in 1956, which may explain its arguments that homosexuality suffers from the pain of never-resolved separateness, or that we must equal love of God with love of man. Still, these parts of the book clouded the rest of its conviction and radiance, which saddened me because Fromm combined theories from history, philosophy, religion, and more.
Overall, recommended to those interested in love or psychology. While my rating might look a little low, I believe that reading this book could change many people's lives for the better.
May 29, 2017
毓卮賯 丿乇 賵賴賱賴 賳禺爻鬲 亘爻鬲诏賶 亘賴 賷賰 卮禺氐 禺丕氐 賳賷爻鬲貙 亘賱賰賴 賳賵毓賶 乇賵賷賴 賵 噩賴鬲诏賷乇賶 丌丿賲賶 丕爻鬲 賰賴 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲賶 噩賴丕賳貙 賳賴 亘賴 賷賰 賲毓卮賵賯 禺丕氐 賲賶 倬賷賵賳丿丿.
丕诏乇 丕賳爻丕賳 賮賯胤 賷賰賶 乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 亘丿丕乇丿 賵 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 丿賷诏乇丕賳 亘賶 丕毓鬲賳丕 亘丕卮丿 倬賷賵賳丿 丕賵 毓卮賯 賳賷爻鬲貙 亘賱賰賴 賷賰 賳賵毓 賴賲夭賷爻鬲賶 賷丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴賶 诏爻鬲乇卮 賷丕賮鬲賴 丕爻鬲.
亘丕 丕賷賳 丨丕賱 賲乇丿賲 賮賰乇 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 毓賱鬲 毓卮賯 賵噩賵丿 賲毓卮賵賯 丕爻鬲貙 賳賴 鬲賵丕賳丕賷賶 丿乇賵賳賶. 丿乇 丨賯賷賯鬲 賮賰乇 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 賰賴 趩賵賳 賰爻 丿賷诏乇賶 乇丕 噩夭 賲毓卮賵賯 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 丕賷賳 丿賱賷賱賶 亘乇 卮丿鬲 毓卮賯 卮丕賳 丕爻鬲. 趩賵賳 丿乇賰 賳賲賶 賰賳賳丿 毓卮賯 賷賰 鬲賵丕賳丕賷賶 乇賵丨賶 丕爻鬲貙 禺賷丕賱 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 鬲賳賴丕 趩賷夭 賱丕夭賲 倬賷丿丕 賰乇丿賳 賲毓卮賵賯 賲賳丕爻亘 丕爻鬲 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳 賴賲賴 趩賷夭 亘賴 禺賵丿賶 禺賵丿 丕丿丕賲賴 禺賵丕賴丿 賷丕賮鬲.
丕诏乇 丕賳爻丕賳 賮賯胤 賷賰賶 乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 亘丿丕乇丿 賵 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 丿賷诏乇丕賳 亘賶 丕毓鬲賳丕 亘丕卮丿 倬賷賵賳丿 丕賵 毓卮賯 賳賷爻鬲貙 亘賱賰賴 賷賰 賳賵毓 賴賲夭賷爻鬲賶 賷丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴賶 诏爻鬲乇卮 賷丕賮鬲賴 丕爻鬲.
亘丕 丕賷賳 丨丕賱 賲乇丿賲 賮賰乇 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 毓賱鬲 毓卮賯 賵噩賵丿 賲毓卮賵賯 丕爻鬲貙 賳賴 鬲賵丕賳丕賷賶 丿乇賵賳賶. 丿乇 丨賯賷賯鬲 賮賰乇 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 賰賴 趩賵賳 賰爻 丿賷诏乇賶 乇丕 噩夭 賲毓卮賵賯 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 丕賷賳 丿賱賷賱賶 亘乇 卮丿鬲 毓卮賯 卮丕賳 丕爻鬲. 趩賵賳 丿乇賰 賳賲賶 賰賳賳丿 毓卮賯 賷賰 鬲賵丕賳丕賷賶 乇賵丨賶 丕爻鬲貙 禺賷丕賱 賲賶 賰賳賳丿 鬲賳賴丕 趩賷夭 賱丕夭賲 倬賷丿丕 賰乇丿賳 賲毓卮賵賯 賲賳丕爻亘 丕爻鬲 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳 賴賲賴 趩賷夭 亘賴 禺賵丿賶 禺賵丿 丕丿丕賲賴 禺賵丕賴丿 賷丕賮鬲.
June 1, 2017
毓卮賯貙賵丕跇賴 丕蹖 讴賴 亘蹖卮 丕夭 倬蹖卮 亘丕 丌賳 賲賵丕噩賴 丕蹖賲 賵丕跇賴 丕蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 亘乇丿丕卮鬲 卮丿賴 賵 亘賴 讴丕乇 賲蹖乇賵丿:
鈽呚ж� 賳馗乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴貙丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 毓賱鬲 丌诏丕賴蹖 丕夭 禺賵丿 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賲賵噩賵丿蹖 賲爻鬲賯賱 讴賴 賴蹖趩 诏賵賳賴 丕乇丕丿賴 丕蹖 丿乇 鬲賵賱丿 賵 賲乇诏 禺賵蹖卮 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 賴乇丕爻 丕夭 賲乇诏 禺賵丿 賵 丕胤乇丕賮蹖丕賳卮 丿趩丕乇 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賵 賳诏乇丕賳蹖 爻鬲.爻乇趩卮賲賴 鬲賲丕賲蹖 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賴丕貙 噩丿丕蹖蹖 賵 乇賴丕蹖蹖 爻鬲.亘賳丕亘乇丕蹖賳 讴賵卮卮 丕賳爻丕賳 賴賲賵丕乇賴 亘乇 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿賴 鬲丕 亘乇 丕蹖賳 丨爻 賮丕亍賯 丌蹖丿.丿乇 诏匕卮鬲賴 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 胤亘蹖毓鬲貙丕夭蹖賳 乇賳噩 賲蹖 讴丕爻鬲賴 丕賲丕 亘丕 诏匕乇 夭賲丕賳 賵 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲 鬲賲丿賳 乇賵夭 亘賴 乇賵夭亘乇 丨爻 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丕賮夭賵丿賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿.毓蹖丕卮蹖 噩賳爻蹖 賵 賲蹖 诏爻丕乇蹖 卮丕蹖丿 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 乇丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賮乇丕乇 丕夭 噩丿丕蹖蹖 亘丕卮丿 丕賲丕 倬爻 丕夭 夭丕蹖賱 卮丿賳 禺丕氐蹖鬲 丌賳 丨爻 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賮乇丿 亘蹖卮 丕夭 倬蹖卮 賲蹖诏乇丿丿.
鈽呚关促� 乇丕賴蹖 爻鬲 亘乇丕蹖 鬲爻賱胤 亘乇 倬賵趩蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖.毓卮賯 賵丕賯毓蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 賳孬丕乇 讴乇丿賳....毓卮賯 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 爻賲鬲 丨賮馗 賵丨丿鬲 賵 賮乇丿蹖鬲 爻賵賯 賲蹖丿賴丿.
鈽呝佖辟堎呚屬嗀肛� 賮乇賵蹖丿 賲亘賳蹖 亘乇 丕蹖賳讴賴 毓卮賯 丕禺鬲氐丕氐丕 鬲噩賱蹖 睾乇蹖夭賴 噩賳爻蹖 爻鬲貙賲賵乇丿 賳賯丿 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿.丕夭 賳馗乇 賵蹖 丕乇囟丕蹖 鬲賳卮 噩賳爻蹖 賮賯胤 噩夭卅蹖 丕夭 丕賳诏蹖夭賴 蹖 噩丕匕亘賴 蹖 丿賵 噩賳爻 賲禺丕賱賮 丕爻鬲.
鈽呚关促� 噩賳爻蹖 亘蹖賳 丿賵 丕賳爻丕賳 亘蹖诏丕賳賴 亘丕 賮乇賵 乇蹖禺鬲賳 賲丕賳毓 亘蹖賳 丌賳 丿賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 诏乇賮鬲賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿 賵 趩賵賳 卮賳丕禺鬲 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 賮賯胤 賲丨丿賵丿 亘賴 爻胤丨 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 丕爻鬲 倬爻 丕夭 卮賳丕禺鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖 賵 讴卮賮 賴爻鬲蹖 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿.賵 丕蹖賳 鬲噩丕乇亘 亘丕乇賴丕 乇禺 賲蹖 丿賴丿 賵 亘蹖诏丕賳賴 賴丕 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賵 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 毓卮賯蹖 噩丿蹖丿 賲蹖 乇賵賳丿.丕诏乇 毓卮賯 夭賳 賵 賲乇丿 毓卮賯蹖 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳賴 賳亘丕卮丿 賴乇 诏夭 亘賴 倬蹖賵賳丿蹖 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳趩賴 丕夭 倬蹖賵賳丿 诏匕乇丕蹖 毓蹖丕卮蹖 丿爻鬲 賲蹖 丿賴丿 賲賳鬲賴蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿.
鈽呚关促� 賲丕丿乇 亘賴 賮乇夭賳丿 丕夭 賳賵毓 賳蹖丕夭 賵 賮丿丕讴丕乇蹖 讴丕賲賱 丕爻鬲 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 毓卮賯 倬丿乇 亘乇丕蹖 亘乇丌賵乇丿賳 丕賳鬲馗丕乇丕鬲 賵 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賴丕蹖 丕賵爻鬲.
鈽呚关促� 亘賴 禺丿丕 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 賴賳賵夭 亘丕 胤亘蹖毓鬲 倬蹖賵賳丿 毓賲蹖賯蹖 丿丕乇丿 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 賲丕賴貙爻鬲丕乇賴貙丨蹖賵丕賳貙丿乇禺鬲 賵... 賳賲賵丿 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 倬爻 丕夭 诏爻鬲乇卮 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 丿爻鬲蹖 賵 丕亘夭丕乇貙亘鬲 賴丕蹖 丿爻鬲 爻丕禺鬲 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 卮丿賴 賵 爻倬爻 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 亘卮乇 丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘丕賱丕鬲乇蹖賳 賲賵噩賵丿 夭賲蹖賳 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿貙亘賴 禺丿丕蹖丕賳蹖 亘丕 賴蹖亘鬲 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿.賵 賴賲蹖賳 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丕夭 賲丕丿乇 爻丕賱丕乇 亘賴 倬丿乇 爻丕賱丕乇 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賲蹖蹖丕亘賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 賳賲丕丿 禺丿丕賵賳丿 亘禺卮賳丿賴 賵 禺丿丕賵賳丿 毓丕丿賱 丕爻鬲貨鬲丕 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 亘丕賵乇 亘賴 禺丿丕 亘賴 鬲毓丕丿賱蹖 亘蹖賳 丕蹖賳 丿賵 賲蹖乇爻丿 賵 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕賱睾 丕賲乇賵夭 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 亘乇爻丿 讴賴 讴賴 禺丿丕 乇丕 睾蹖乇 賯丕亘賱 賳丕賲 诏匕丕乇蹖 賵 丕孬亘丕鬲 亘丿丕賳丿.
銆�"毓卮賯 亘賴 賲毓賳丕蹖 丕乇囟丕蹖 噩賳爻蹖 丿賵 噩丕賳亘賴 賵 毓卮賯 亘賴 賲毓賳丕蹖 讴丕乇 鬲蹖賲蹖 賵 倬賳丕賴诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 诏乇蹖禺鬲賳 丕夭 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丿賵 氐賵乇鬲 毓丕丿蹖 丕夭 丕賳丨胤丕胤 毓卮賯 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 睾乇亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇賴 蹖 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 趩賳蹖賳 毓卮賯蹖 亘蹖賲丕乇 诏賵賳 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 丌賵乇丿賴 丕爻鬲."銆�
鈽呚ж� 賳馗乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴貙丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 毓賱鬲 丌诏丕賴蹖 丕夭 禺賵丿 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賲賵噩賵丿蹖 賲爻鬲賯賱 讴賴 賴蹖趩 诏賵賳賴 丕乇丕丿賴 丕蹖 丿乇 鬲賵賱丿 賵 賲乇诏 禺賵蹖卮 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 賴乇丕爻 丕夭 賲乇诏 禺賵丿 賵 丕胤乇丕賮蹖丕賳卮 丿趩丕乇 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賵 賳诏乇丕賳蹖 爻鬲.爻乇趩卮賲賴 鬲賲丕賲蹖 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賴丕貙 噩丿丕蹖蹖 賵 乇賴丕蹖蹖 爻鬲.亘賳丕亘乇丕蹖賳 讴賵卮卮 丕賳爻丕賳 賴賲賵丕乇賴 亘乇 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿賴 鬲丕 亘乇 丕蹖賳 丨爻 賮丕亍賯 丌蹖丿.丿乇 诏匕卮鬲賴 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 胤亘蹖毓鬲貙丕夭蹖賳 乇賳噩 賲蹖 讴丕爻鬲賴 丕賲丕 亘丕 诏匕乇 夭賲丕賳 賵 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲 鬲賲丿賳 乇賵夭 亘賴 乇賵夭亘乇 丨爻 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丕賮夭賵丿賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿.毓蹖丕卮蹖 噩賳爻蹖 賵 賲蹖 诏爻丕乇蹖 卮丕蹖丿 丿乇 馗丕賴乇 乇丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賮乇丕乇 丕夭 噩丿丕蹖蹖 亘丕卮丿 丕賲丕 倬爻 丕夭 夭丕蹖賱 卮丿賳 禺丕氐蹖鬲 丌賳 丨爻 丕囟胤乇丕亘 賮乇丿 亘蹖卮 丕夭 倬蹖卮 賲蹖诏乇丿丿.
鈽呚关促� 乇丕賴蹖 爻鬲 亘乇丕蹖 鬲爻賱胤 亘乇 倬賵趩蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖.毓卮賯 賵丕賯毓蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 賳孬丕乇 讴乇丿賳....毓卮賯 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 爻賲鬲 丨賮馗 賵丨丿鬲 賵 賮乇丿蹖鬲 爻賵賯 賲蹖丿賴丿.
鈽呝佖辟堎呚屬嗀肛� 賮乇賵蹖丿 賲亘賳蹖 亘乇 丕蹖賳讴賴 毓卮賯 丕禺鬲氐丕氐丕 鬲噩賱蹖 睾乇蹖夭賴 噩賳爻蹖 爻鬲貙賲賵乇丿 賳賯丿 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿.丕夭 賳馗乇 賵蹖 丕乇囟丕蹖 鬲賳卮 噩賳爻蹖 賮賯胤 噩夭卅蹖 丕夭 丕賳诏蹖夭賴 蹖 噩丕匕亘賴 蹖 丿賵 噩賳爻 賲禺丕賱賮 丕爻鬲.
鈽呚关促� 噩賳爻蹖 亘蹖賳 丿賵 丕賳爻丕賳 亘蹖诏丕賳賴 亘丕 賮乇賵 乇蹖禺鬲賳 賲丕賳毓 亘蹖賳 丌賳 丿賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 诏乇賮鬲賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿 賵 趩賵賳 卮賳丕禺鬲 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 賮賯胤 賲丨丿賵丿 亘賴 爻胤丨 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 丕爻鬲 倬爻 丕夭 卮賳丕禺鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖 賵 讴卮賮 賴爻鬲蹖 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿.賵 丕蹖賳 鬲噩丕乇亘 亘丕乇賴丕 乇禺 賲蹖 丿賴丿 賵 亘蹖诏丕賳賴 賴丕 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賵 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 毓卮賯蹖 噩丿蹖丿 賲蹖 乇賵賳丿.丕诏乇 毓卮賯 夭賳 賵 賲乇丿 毓卮賯蹖 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳賴 賳亘丕卮丿 賴乇 诏夭 亘賴 倬蹖賵賳丿蹖 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳趩賴 丕夭 倬蹖賵賳丿 诏匕乇丕蹖 毓蹖丕卮蹖 丿爻鬲 賲蹖 丿賴丿 賲賳鬲賴蹖 賳禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿.
鈽呚关促� 賲丕丿乇 亘賴 賮乇夭賳丿 丕夭 賳賵毓 賳蹖丕夭 賵 賮丿丕讴丕乇蹖 讴丕賲賱 丕爻鬲 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 毓卮賯 倬丿乇 亘乇丕蹖 亘乇丌賵乇丿賳 丕賳鬲馗丕乇丕鬲 賵 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賴丕蹖 丕賵爻鬲.
鈽呚关促� 亘賴 禺丿丕 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 亘卮乇蹖鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 賴賳賵夭 亘丕 胤亘蹖毓鬲 倬蹖賵賳丿 毓賲蹖賯蹖 丿丕乇丿 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 賲丕賴貙爻鬲丕乇賴貙丨蹖賵丕賳貙丿乇禺鬲 賵... 賳賲賵丿 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 倬爻 丕夭 诏爻鬲乇卮 讴丕乇賴丕蹖 丿爻鬲蹖 賵 丕亘夭丕乇貙亘鬲 賴丕蹖 丿爻鬲 爻丕禺鬲 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 卮丿賴 賵 爻倬爻 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 亘卮乇 丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘丕賱丕鬲乇蹖賳 賲賵噩賵丿 夭賲蹖賳 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿貙亘賴 禺丿丕蹖丕賳蹖 亘丕 賴蹖亘鬲 丕賳爻丕賳 乇賵 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿.賵 賴賲蹖賳 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丕夭 賲丕丿乇 爻丕賱丕乇 亘賴 倬丿乇 爻丕賱丕乇 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賲蹖蹖丕亘賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 賳賲丕丿 禺丿丕賵賳丿 亘禺卮賳丿賴 賵 禺丿丕賵賳丿 毓丕丿賱 丕爻鬲貨鬲丕 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 亘丕賵乇 亘賴 禺丿丕 亘賴 鬲毓丕丿賱蹖 亘蹖賳 丕蹖賳 丿賵 賲蹖乇爻丿 賵 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕賱睾 丕賲乇賵夭 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 亘乇爻丿 讴賴 讴賴 禺丿丕 乇丕 睾蹖乇 賯丕亘賱 賳丕賲 诏匕丕乇蹖 賵 丕孬亘丕鬲 亘丿丕賳丿.
銆�"毓卮賯 亘賴 賲毓賳丕蹖 丕乇囟丕蹖 噩賳爻蹖 丿賵 噩丕賳亘賴 賵 毓卮賯 亘賴 賲毓賳丕蹖 讴丕乇 鬲蹖賲蹖 賵 倬賳丕賴诏丕賴蹖 亘乇丕蹖 诏乇蹖禺鬲賳 丕夭 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丿賵 氐賵乇鬲 毓丕丿蹖 丕夭 丕賳丨胤丕胤 毓卮賯 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 睾乇亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇賴 蹖 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 趩賳蹖賳 毓卮賯蹖 亘蹖賲丕乇 诏賵賳 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 丌賵乇丿賴 丕爻鬲."銆�
December 6, 2011
One of my favorite books. I've read it three times now, and i'll probably read it several more times in the future. I really appreciate what a "down to earth" way of dealing with his subject matter that Fromm has. He recognizes that no book can make you a more loving person, but he does recognize that by calling our attention to the myriad ways that we misunderstand, and deceive ourselves about love, we can begin to approach a better understanding of what it might take to become better lovers. He implicates everything from our philosophical assumptions to the way we work in a capitalist society to the way we endlessly pursue idle amusement over the development of the kind of character that energizes a person to act more lovingly in the world. Being principally a psychoanalyst, Fromm is also extremely helpful at helping us see the connections between how we act, how we think, and what we learned early on about the meaning (or illusion/delusion/frustration) of love. Another book I think I could benefit from reading every other year.
August 26, 2015
I couldn't finish it. I just couldn't. Not only does it focus on the psyche through an exclusively heteronormative lens (which made me uncomfortable, yeah, but wasn't an outright deal breaker then), but it also drew too many conclusions based on the outdated archetype of a cartoonishly puffed-up man enslaved by the faculties of reasoning and logic and other things dickweeds of history have attached inalienably to machismo (but never the capacity for love!) and that of the woman who is (of course!) simultaneously soft and the salt of the earth as well as its goddamn scourge.
What few beautiful and telling ideas pertaining to erotic, familial, and self-love expounded upon in Fromm's self-help (oh god, self-HELP...?)book are ultimately founded upon harmful psychoanalytic hooplah-relics that were abandoned in the late 20th century for a reason.
Just. No. No.
What few beautiful and telling ideas pertaining to erotic, familial, and self-love expounded upon in Fromm's self-help (oh god, self-HELP...?)book are ultimately founded upon harmful psychoanalytic hooplah-relics that were abandoned in the late 20th century for a reason.
Just. No. No.
July 17, 2017
禺蹖賱蹖 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘. 賲禺氐賵氐丕賸 賮氐賱 丌禺乇 (鬲賲乇蹖賳 毓卮賯) 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促� 诏賮鬲 賴乇 氐賮丨賴鈥屫簇� 丿乇爻蹖 亘乇丕賲 丿丕卮鬲.
丕夭 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘:
丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳 亘丿蹖賳 賲毓賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丿賵賳 賴蹖趩 囟賲丕賳鬲蹖 賵丕诏匕丕乇丿貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴丕賲賱 鬲爻賱蹖賲 讴賳丿貙 賮賯胤 亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丕蹖賳 讴賴 毓卮賯卮 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 丿乇 賲毓卮賵賯 丕蹖噩丕丿 毓卮賯 賲鬲賯丕亘賱 讴賳丿.
丕夭 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘:
丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳 亘丿蹖賳 賲毓賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丿賵賳 賴蹖趩 囟賲丕賳鬲蹖 賵丕诏匕丕乇丿貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴丕賲賱 鬲爻賱蹖賲 讴賳丿貙 賮賯胤 亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丕蹖賳 讴賴 毓卮賯卮 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 丿乇 賲毓卮賵賯 丕蹖噩丕丿 毓卮賯 賲鬲賯丕亘賱 讴賳丿.
August 11, 2020
Un libro del cual me llevo varias ense帽anzas importantes, empieza muy bien pero conforme avanzan las p谩ginas se vuelve un poco tedioso cuando adentra en el psicoan谩lisis y en ocasiones sientes que esto es un libro de autoayuda, lo cual aunque no fuera mucho de mi agrado lo comprendo, ya que se necesita un sustento te贸rico para dar sus opiniones y a la vez debe de intentar ser muy pr谩ctico y simple en sus ense帽anzas para llegar a la mayor cantidad de p煤blico, para poder transmitir ese mensaje que tanta falta nos hace, sobre aprender de la actividad de 鈥渁mar鈥� en todos sus aspectos.
鈥渆l bien y el mal no existen si no hay libertad para desobedecer鈥�
"en el amor se da la paradoja de dos seres que se convierten en uno, y no obstante, siguen siendo dos鈥�
鈥渆l amor solo comienza a desarrollarse cuando amamos a quienes no necesitamos para nuestros fines personales鈥�
鈥渓a idea de una relaci贸n que puede disolverse f谩cilmente si no resulta exitosa es tan err贸nea como la idea de que tal relaci贸n no debe disolverse bajo ninguna circunstancia鈥�
鈥渓a sociedad contempor谩nea predica el ideal de la igualdad no individualizada, porque necesita 谩tomos humanos, todos id茅nticos, para hacerlos funcionar en masa, suavemente, sin fricci贸n; todos obedecen las mismas 贸rdenes y no obstante, todos est谩n convencidos de que siguen sus propios deseos.鈥�
鈥渆l bien y el mal no existen si no hay libertad para desobedecer鈥�
"en el amor se da la paradoja de dos seres que se convierten en uno, y no obstante, siguen siendo dos鈥�
鈥渆l amor solo comienza a desarrollarse cuando amamos a quienes no necesitamos para nuestros fines personales鈥�
鈥渓a idea de una relaci贸n que puede disolverse f谩cilmente si no resulta exitosa es tan err贸nea como la idea de que tal relaci贸n no debe disolverse bajo ninguna circunstancia鈥�
鈥渓a sociedad contempor谩nea predica el ideal de la igualdad no individualizada, porque necesita 谩tomos humanos, todos id茅nticos, para hacerlos funcionar en masa, suavemente, sin fricci贸n; todos obedecen las mismas 贸rdenes y no obstante, todos est谩n convencidos de que siguen sus propios deseos.鈥�
August 1, 2016
賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賴丿蹖賴 诏乇賮鬲賲貙 丕夭 胤乇賮 讴爻蹖 讴賴 賮讴乇 賲蹖 讴乇丿 鬲賵 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳 賵 蹖丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳 賲卮讴賱 丿丕乇賲. 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 丿賵爻鬲 毓夭蹖夭賲 賮讴乇 賲蹖 讴乇丿 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖 鬲賵賳賲 鬲丕 丨丿蹖 賲卮讴賱賲 乇賵 丨賱 讴賳賲貙 丕賲丕 賵賯鬲蹖 禺胤 亘賴 禺胤 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賲蹖 禺賵賳丿賲 鬲丕夭賴 賮賴賲蹖丿賲 讴賴 毓卮賯 丕氐賱丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 乇丕丨鬲 亘卮賴 亘賴 丿爻鬲卮 丌賵乇丿 賵 乇丕丨鬲 賴賲 賳诏賴卮 丿丕卮鬲.
丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲丕賴乇丕賳賴 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕賳賵丕毓 乇丕亘胤賴 賴丕蹖 毓丕卮賯丕賳賴貙 賲孬賱 乇丕亘胤賴 賵丕賱丿蹖賳-賮乇夭賳丿蹖貙 禺丿丕-賲禺賱賵賯貙 毓卮賯 亘賴 噩賳爻 賲禺丕賱賮 .. 乇賵 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖 丿賴 賵 讴賲讴 賲蹖 讴賳賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丕蹖賳丕 乇賵 亘賮賴賲蹖賲 鬲丕 丕賵賳丕 乇賵 亘丕 賴賲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 賳诏蹖乇蹖賲.
讴鬲丕亘 卮丕賲賱 爻賴 亘禺卮 賳馗乇蹖賴 蹖 毓卮賯貙 毓卮賯 賵 丕賳丨胤丕胤 丌賳 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賲毓丕氐乇 睾乇亘 (讴賴 丕賱丕賳 丿蹖诏賴 卮乇賯賲 亘賴卮 丕囟丕賮賴 賲蹖 卮賴) 賵 鬲賲乇蹖賳 毓卮賯 賴爻鬲.
讴鬲丕亘 鬲賵賳爻鬲賴 亘賴 趩丕倬 爻蹖 賵 蹖讴賲 亘乇爻賴 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 毓賳賵丕賳卮 亘賵丿賴貙 讴賴 毓賵丕賲 賲乇丿賲貙 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖 鬲賵賳賳丿 乇丕丨鬲鬲乇 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳丿 賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘卮賳丿. 讴賴 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳 胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕鬲賮丕賯丕 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲賴 趩蹖 爻禺鬲鬲乇 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿.
禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丨鬲賲丕 鬲賵氐蹖賴 賲蹖 讴賳賲. 讴賲讴 賲蹖 讴賳賴 亘丕 丿蹖丿 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳 賳诏丕賴 讴賳蹖丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 乇賵丕賳蹖 賴賲 丿丕乇賴.
"噩賲賱丕鬲 賯氐丕乇 讴鬲丕亘"
氐賮丨賴 7/
丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳丿貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 毓卮賯 賳賲蹖 賵乇夭丿. 丌賳讴賴 丕夭 毓賴丿賴 蹖 賴蹖趩 讴丕乇蹖 亘乇 賳賲蹖 丌蹖丿貙 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮 丕爻鬲. 賵賱蹖 丌賳讴賴 賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 亘蹖 诏賲丕賳 毓卮賯 賲蹖 賵乇夭丿貙 賲卮丕賴丿賴 賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 賲蹖 亘蹖賳丿... 賴乇趩賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丿丕賳卮 丌丿賲蹖 丿乇 趩蹖夭蹖 匕丕鬲蹖 亘丕卮丿貙 毓卮賯 亘丿丕賳 亘夭乇诏鬲乇 丕爻鬲... 賴乇 讴賴 賮讴乇 讴賳丿 賴賲賴 蹖 賲蹖賵賴 賴丕 丿乇 賴賲丕賳 賵賯鬲 賲蹖 乇爻賳丿 讴賴 鬲賵鬲 賮乇賳诏蹖貙 丕夭 丕賳诏賵乇 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳丿. "倬丕乇丕爻賱賵爻"
氐賮丨賴 36/
丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 丕賳爻丕賳 賵乇亘丕胤賴 丕卮 乇丕 亘丕 丿賳蹖丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 乇丕亘胤賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賮乇囟 讴賳蹖丿貙 丿乇 賳馗乇 亘诏蹖乇蹖丿 讴賴 毓卮賯 乇丕 鬲賳賴丕 亘丕 毓卮賯 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 賲亘丕丿賱賴 讴乇丿貙 賵丕毓鬲賲丕丿 乇丕 亘丕 丕毓鬲賲丕丿 賵 亘乇 賴賲蹖賳 賯蹖丕爻. 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丕夭 賴賳乇 賱匕鬲 亘亘乇蹖丿貙 亘丕蹖丿 丌賲賵夭卮 賴賳乇蹖 丿蹖丿賴 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丿乇 丿蹖诏乇丕賳 賲賵孬乇 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 禺賵丿鬲丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 賵丕賯毓丕 卮禺氐蹖 倬乇卮賵乇 賵 毓丕賲賱 賳賮賵匕 丿乇 賲乇丿賲 亘丕卮蹖丿. 賴乇 蹖讴 丕夭 乇賵亘丕胤 卮賲丕 亘丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 亘丕 胤亘蹖毓鬲 賲亘蹖賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 賮乇丿蹖 賵 丨賯蹖賯蹖 卮賲丕貙 讴賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 丕夭 禺賵丕爻鬲 丕乇丕丿蹖 卮賲丕爻鬲貙 亘丕卮丿. 丕诏乇 卮賲丕 亘丿賵賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 胤賱亘 毓卮賯 讴賳蹖丿貙 毓卮賯 賲蹖 賵乇夭蹖丿貙 蹖毓賳蹖 丕诏乇 毓卮賯 卮賲丕 毓卮賯蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賯丿乇鬲 鬲賵賱蹖丿 毓卮賯 乇丕 賳丿丕乇丿貙 丕诏乇 亘賴 賵爻蹖賱賴 蹖 鬲噩賱蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 毓丕卮賯 丕夭 禺賵丿鬲丕賳 蹖讴 賲毓卮賵賯 賳爻丕禺鬲賴 丕蹖丿貙 毓卮賯 卮賲丕 賳丕鬲賵丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 蹖讴 亘丿亘禺鬲蹖 丕爻鬲.
氐賮丨賴 52/
毓卮賯 讴賵丿讴丕賳賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕氐賱 倬蹖乇賵蹖 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴:" 賲賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲賲 丿丕乇賳丿."貙 毓卮賯 倬禺鬲賴 賵 讴丕賲賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕氐賱 讴賴: "賲乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳丿 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲" 毓卮賯 賳丕亘丕賱睾 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿:" 賲賳 鬲賵乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿賲". 毓卮賯 乇卮丿 蹖丕賮鬲賴 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿:" 賲賳 亘賴 鬲賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿賲 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲鬲 丿丕乇賲".
丕乇蹖讴 賮乇賵賲 亘爻蹖丕乇 賲丕賴乇丕賳賴 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕賳賵丕毓 乇丕亘胤賴 賴丕蹖 毓丕卮賯丕賳賴貙 賲孬賱 乇丕亘胤賴 賵丕賱丿蹖賳-賮乇夭賳丿蹖貙 禺丿丕-賲禺賱賵賯貙 毓卮賯 亘賴 噩賳爻 賲禺丕賱賮 .. 乇賵 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖 丿賴 賵 讴賲讴 賲蹖 讴賳賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丕蹖賳丕 乇賵 亘賮賴賲蹖賲 鬲丕 丕賵賳丕 乇賵 亘丕 賴賲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 賳诏蹖乇蹖賲.
讴鬲丕亘 卮丕賲賱 爻賴 亘禺卮 賳馗乇蹖賴 蹖 毓卮賯貙 毓卮賯 賵 丕賳丨胤丕胤 丌賳 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賲毓丕氐乇 睾乇亘 (讴賴 丕賱丕賳 丿蹖诏賴 卮乇賯賲 亘賴卮 丕囟丕賮賴 賲蹖 卮賴) 賵 鬲賲乇蹖賳 毓卮賯 賴爻鬲.
讴鬲丕亘 鬲賵賳爻鬲賴 亘賴 趩丕倬 爻蹖 賵 蹖讴賲 亘乇爻賴 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 毓賳賵丕賳卮 亘賵丿賴貙 讴賴 毓賵丕賲 賲乇丿賲貙 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖 鬲賵賳賳丿 乇丕丨鬲鬲乇 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳丿 賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘卮賳丿. 讴賴 丕氐賱丕 丕蹖賳 胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕鬲賮丕賯丕 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲賴 趩蹖 爻禺鬲鬲乇 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿.
禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丨鬲賲丕 鬲賵氐蹖賴 賲蹖 讴賳賲. 讴賲讴 賲蹖 讴賳賴 亘丕 丿蹖丿 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳 賳诏丕賴 讴賳蹖丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 乇賵丕賳蹖 賴賲 丿丕乇賴.
"噩賲賱丕鬲 賯氐丕乇 讴鬲丕亘"
氐賮丨賴 7/
丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳丿貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 毓卮賯 賳賲蹖 賵乇夭丿. 丌賳讴賴 丕夭 毓賴丿賴 蹖 賴蹖趩 讴丕乇蹖 亘乇 賳賲蹖 丌蹖丿貙 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 丌賳讴賴 賴蹖趩 賳賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮 丕爻鬲. 賵賱蹖 丌賳讴賴 賲蹖 賮賴賲丿貙 亘蹖 诏賲丕賳 毓卮賯 賲蹖 賵乇夭丿貙 賲卮丕賴丿賴 賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 賲蹖 亘蹖賳丿... 賴乇趩賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丿丕賳卮 丌丿賲蹖 丿乇 趩蹖夭蹖 匕丕鬲蹖 亘丕卮丿貙 毓卮賯 亘丿丕賳 亘夭乇诏鬲乇 丕爻鬲... 賴乇 讴賴 賮讴乇 讴賳丿 賴賲賴 蹖 賲蹖賵賴 賴丕 丿乇 賴賲丕賳 賵賯鬲 賲蹖 乇爻賳丿 讴賴 鬲賵鬲 賮乇賳诏蹖貙 丕夭 丕賳诏賵乇 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳丿. "倬丕乇丕爻賱賵爻"
氐賮丨賴 36/
丕賳爻丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 丕賳爻丕賳 賵乇亘丕胤賴 丕卮 乇丕 亘丕 丿賳蹖丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 乇丕亘胤賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賮乇囟 讴賳蹖丿貙 丿乇 賳馗乇 亘诏蹖乇蹖丿 讴賴 毓卮賯 乇丕 鬲賳賴丕 亘丕 毓卮賯 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 賲亘丕丿賱賴 讴乇丿貙 賵丕毓鬲賲丕丿 乇丕 亘丕 丕毓鬲賲丕丿 賵 亘乇 賴賲蹖賳 賯蹖丕爻. 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丕夭 賴賳乇 賱匕鬲 亘亘乇蹖丿貙 亘丕蹖丿 丌賲賵夭卮 賴賳乇蹖 丿蹖丿賴 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 丕诏乇 亘禺賵丕賴蹖丿 丿乇 丿蹖诏乇丕賳 賲賵孬乇 亘丕卮蹖丿貙 禺賵丿鬲丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 賵丕賯毓丕 卮禺氐蹖 倬乇卮賵乇 賵 毓丕賲賱 賳賮賵匕 丿乇 賲乇丿賲 亘丕卮蹖丿. 賴乇 蹖讴 丕夭 乇賵亘丕胤 卮賲丕 亘丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 亘丕 胤亘蹖毓鬲 賲亘蹖賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 賮乇丿蹖 賵 丨賯蹖賯蹖 卮賲丕貙 讴賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 丕夭 禺賵丕爻鬲 丕乇丕丿蹖 卮賲丕爻鬲貙 亘丕卮丿. 丕诏乇 卮賲丕 亘丿賵賳 丕蹖賳讴賴 胤賱亘 毓卮賯 讴賳蹖丿貙 毓卮賯 賲蹖 賵乇夭蹖丿貙 蹖毓賳蹖 丕诏乇 毓卮賯 卮賲丕 毓卮賯蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賯丿乇鬲 鬲賵賱蹖丿 毓卮賯 乇丕 賳丿丕乇丿貙 丕诏乇 亘賴 賵爻蹖賱賴 蹖 鬲噩賱蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 毓丕卮賯 丕夭 禺賵丿鬲丕賳 蹖讴 賲毓卮賵賯 賳爻丕禺鬲賴 丕蹖丿貙 毓卮賯 卮賲丕 賳丕鬲賵丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 蹖讴 亘丿亘禺鬲蹖 丕爻鬲.
氐賮丨賴 52/
毓卮賯 讴賵丿讴丕賳賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕氐賱 倬蹖乇賵蹖 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴:" 賲賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲賲 丿丕乇賳丿."貙 毓卮賯 倬禺鬲賴 賵 讴丕賲賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕氐賱 讴賴: "賲乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳丿 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲" 毓卮賯 賳丕亘丕賱睾 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿:" 賲賳 鬲賵乇丕 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿賲". 毓卮賯 乇卮丿 蹖丕賮鬲賴 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿:" 賲賳 亘賴 鬲賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿賲 趩賵賳 丿賵爻鬲鬲 丿丕乇賲".
September 25, 2021
鈥溫з勜� 賳卮丕胤貙 賵賱賷爻 卮毓賵乇賸丕 爻賱亘賷賸丕貙 廿賳賴 丕賱賵賯賵賮 賵賱賷爻 丕賱賵賯賵毓. 賵亘兀卮丿 丕賱胤乇賯 毓賲賵賲賷丞 賷賲賰賳 賵氐賮 丕賱胤丕亘毓 丕賱廿賷噩丕亘賷 亘賯賵賱賳丕 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丕賱毓胤丕亍 兀爻丕爻賸丕 賵賱賷爻 丕賱鬲賱賯賷鈥�.
June 14, 2012
Have you ever held an idea so closely to the sides of your skull, you could never find the words or phrases to articulate it until someone stopped by and presented you with exactly what you had been searching for? Erich Fromm did this for me in the context of mature and fulfilling relationships. In the words of a good friend "more people should realized that 'serious' philosophers devote think about such things" - 'such things' being how interpersonal relationships are the bedrock of most human beings' sanity, and the fact that most of us have the incredible ability to create very unhealthy relationships.
Fromm tells us that first, being an happy, full person on your own, full of self-love, discipline, and productivity is necessary. Then, wishing for all the same in another human being, creates a bridge of emotion. Respect, awareness, and rationality then form the basis of "practicing" love.
Above all, Fromm tells us that loving someone is a decision, and as such, we have full control over our relationships with others and the satisfaction that we derive from them.
As a critique, I will say this: Fromm very obviously had little understanding (or concern with) homosexuality, or any other sexual identity not in line with heterosexual, adult couples. This ignorance on his part is apparent at a point in his writing, but I feel also colors his opinions on fatherhood and the relationship between parents and children. After all, if one believes that a parent's role is directly related to their gender to the extent that it restricts and forms their emotional attachments, then that person could not understand healthy and fulfilled couples of the same gender (or no gender) who successfully fill all the necessary roles of parenthood.
Fromm tells us that first, being an happy, full person on your own, full of self-love, discipline, and productivity is necessary. Then, wishing for all the same in another human being, creates a bridge of emotion. Respect, awareness, and rationality then form the basis of "practicing" love.
Above all, Fromm tells us that loving someone is a decision, and as such, we have full control over our relationships with others and the satisfaction that we derive from them.
As a critique, I will say this: Fromm very obviously had little understanding (or concern with) homosexuality, or any other sexual identity not in line with heterosexual, adult couples. This ignorance on his part is apparent at a point in his writing, but I feel also colors his opinions on fatherhood and the relationship between parents and children. After all, if one believes that a parent's role is directly related to their gender to the extent that it restricts and forms their emotional attachments, then that person could not understand healthy and fulfilled couples of the same gender (or no gender) who successfully fill all the necessary roles of parenthood.
June 7, 2020
''韦伪 伪纬伪胃维 魏蠈蟺慰喂蟼 魏蟿蠋谓蟿伪喂''. 螕蠉蟻蠅 伪蟺蠈 伪蠀蟿蠈谓 蟿慰谓 蟺蠀蟻萎谓伪 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟿蟻苇蠁蔚蟿伪喂 畏 慰蠀蟽委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰蠀 尾喂尾位委慰蠀. 违蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 蟺伪蟻伪未慰蠂萎 蟺蠅蟼 ''围蠅蟻委蟼 蟿畏谓 伪纬维蟺畏 畏 伪谓胃蟻蠅蟺蠈蟿畏蟿伪 未蔚 胃伪 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉蟽蔚 谓伪 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 慰蠉蟿蔚 渭喂伪 渭苇蟻伪'' 慰 Erich Fromm 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 畏 伪纬维蟺畏, 蠅蟼 蠀蟺苇蟻蟿伪蟿慰 伪纬伪胃蠈, 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿慰 蟽蠀谓伪委蟽胃畏渭伪 蔚魏蔚委谓慰 蟺慰蠀 渭蠈谓慰 慰蟻喂蟽渭苇谓慰喂 蔚魏位蔚魏蟿慰委 胃伪 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 蟿蠉蠂畏 谓伪 尾喂蠋蟽慰蠀谓, 伪位位维 蟺蟻蠈魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 渭喂伪 蟿苇蠂谓畏, 魏伪喂 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蠈位蔚蟼 慰喂 蟿苇蠂谓蔚蟼 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰魏蟿萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 魏慰蟺喂维蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 渭慰蠂胃萎蟽蔚喂蟼. 螝伪喂 维蟻伪, 蔚蠁蠈蟽慰谓 未蔚谓 苇纬魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蠉蠂畏 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉谓 蠈位慰喂 谓伪 蟿畏谓 慰谓蔚喂蟻蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟿畏 纬蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪喂, 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蠇蟺蠈胃蔚蟽畏 蠈蟿喂 纬谓蠅蟻委味慰蠀谓 蟺蠋蟼 谓伪 蟿慰 魏维谓慰蠀谓.
韦慰 魏伪魏蠈 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 慰喂 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰喂 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰喂 胃蔚蠅蟻慰蠉谓 蟺蠅蟼 畏 蟺蟻维尉畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蔚蠉魏慰位畏 魏伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 蟿慰 未蠉蟽魏慰位慰 蔚委谓伪喂 谓伪 尾蟻蔚委蟼 蟿慰 魏伪蟿维位位畏位慰 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚委渭蔚谓慰, 苇谓伪谓 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰 未畏位伪未萎 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委蟼 维尉喂慰 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟽蔚 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂. 螝伪喂 蔚蠁蠈蟽慰谓 蟽蟿慰 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓慰 魏蠈蟽渭慰 慰 魏维胃蔚 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蔚蟺喂位苇纬蔚喂 渭蠈谓慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟿慰 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚委渭蔚谓慰 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 (蟽蔚 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟽畏 渭蔚 蟺伪位伪喂蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀谓萎胃蠅蟼 蠀蟺萎蟻蠂蔚 渭蔚蟽维味蠅谓), 伪蠀蟿蠈 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪尉委伪 蟿慰蠀 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚喂渭苇谓慰蠀 魏伪喂 蠀蟺慰尾伪胃渭委味蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 蟿畏谓 伪尉委伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻维尉畏蟼. 螝伪喂 纬喂伪 伪蠀蟿蠈: ''危蠂蔚未蠈谓 魏伪渭喂维 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪, 魏伪谓苇谓伪 苇蟻纬慰, 未蔚谓 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 渭蔚 蟿蠈蟽慰 渭蔚纬维位蔚蟼 蔚位蟺委未蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽未慰魏委蔚蟼, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 畏 伪纬维蟺畏, 魏伪喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰 蟿委蟺慰蟿伪 未蔚谓 伪蟺慰蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蟿蠈蟽慰 蟽蠀蠂谓维 蠈蟽慰 伪蠀蟿萎''.
螒蠀蟿蠈 蟺慰蠀 渭伪谓喂蠅未蠋蟼 蔚蟺喂胃蠀渭蔚委 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 魏伪胃'蠈位畏 蟿畏 未喂维蟻魏蔚喂伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 伪蟺慰蠁蠀纬萎 蟿畏蟼 渭慰谓伪尉喂维蟼 渭苇蟽蠅 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚 维位位慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蠈渭蠅蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀谓萎胃蠅蟼 蟺蔚蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蠄蔚蠀蟿慰蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 魏伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻伪 胃伪 蟿畏 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿畏蟻委味伪渭蔚 蟽蠀渭渭蠈蟻蠁蠅蟽畏 魏伪喂 蠀蟺慰蟿伪纬萎. 螖喂蠈蟿喂 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟺蔚蟿蠉蠂蔚喂 渭喂伪 蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽畏 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺蠅谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰 蠋蟻喂渭慰 蟽蠀谓伪委蟽胃畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 未喂伪蟿萎蟻畏蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪蟿慰渭喂魏萎蟼 伪魏蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼. 螠蔚 位委纬伪 位蠈纬喂伪 ''螐蟻喂渭畏 伪纬维蟺畏 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽畏 蠈蟺慰蠀 未蠉慰 维蟿慰渭伪 纬委谓慰谓蟿伪喂 苇谓伪 魏伪喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰 蟺伪蟻伪渭苇谓慰蠀谓 未蠉慰'' !!
螕喂伪 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏维蟺慰喂慰谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 蟺蟻蠋蟿伪 谓伪 伪蟺慰未蔚蠂蟿蔚委蟼 蠈蟿喂 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰蠀 未蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏慰渭渭维蟿喂伪 蟿慰蠀 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟽慰蠀. 螒位位维 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪谓蟿喂位畏蠁胃蔚委蟼 蟿慰 未蠈蟽喂渭慰 蠈蠂喂 蠅蟼 蠂维蟽喂渭慰, 伪位位维 蠅蟼 伪蟺蠈未蔚喂尉畏 蟿慰蠀 蟺位慰蠉蟿慰蠀 蟽慰蠀. ''螤位慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿蠈蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂蔚喂, 伪位位维 伪蠀蟿蠈蟼 蟺慰蠀 未委谓蔚喂''. 螒谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂蟼 蟿畏谓 蟿苇蠂谓畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委蟼 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺维蟼 苇谓伪 渭蠈谓慰 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚委蟽伪喂 伪未喂维蠁慰蟻慰蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰谓 蠀蟺蠈位慰喂蟺慰 魏蠈蟽渭慰 伪蠁慰蠉 畏 蟺蟻维尉畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 未蔚谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蟻喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼: ''螒谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 伪纬伪蟺蠋 苇谓伪谓 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蠈位慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟿畏 味蠅萎. 螒谓 渭蟺慰蟻蠋 谓伪 蟺蠅 蟽蔚 魏维蟺慰喂慰谓 维位位慰 蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蔚委渭伪喂 喂魏伪谓蠈蟼 谓伪 蟺蠅 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟽蔚 蟽苇谓伪 蠈位慰蠀蟼, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 蟽苇谓伪 蠈位慰 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟽苇谓伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭慰蠀'' !!! (螝喂 伪纬伪蟺蠋 魏喂 蠈位慰 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰 纬喂伪蟿委 味蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟽蠉 渭伪味委..)
违蟺蠈 蟿慰 蟺蟻委蟽渭伪 伪蠀蟿蠈 蔚尉蔚蟿维味蔚喂 蠈位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 渭慰蟻蠁苇蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼: 蟿畏 渭畏蟿蟻喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 伪未蔚蟻蠁喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 蔚蟻蠅蟿喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 伪纬维蟺畏 蟽蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪纬维蟺畏 蟽蟿慰 螛蔚蠈 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蠋谓蟿伪蟼 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪位维尾蔚喂 蟺蠋蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 谓畏蟺喂伪魏蠈 蟽蟿维未喂慰 ''伪纬伪蟺蠋 纬喂伪蟿委 伪纬伪蟺喂苇渭伪喂'' 蟺蔚蟻谓维渭蔚 蟽蟿慰 蠋蟻喂渭慰 蟽蟿维未喂慰 ''伪纬伪蟺喂苇渭伪喂 纬喂伪蟿委 伪纬伪蟺蠋''. 螤蠋蟼 伪蟺'蟿慰 ''蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋 纬喂伪蟿委 蟽蔚 蠂蟻蔚喂维味慰渭伪喂'' 蟺蔚蟻谓维渭蔚 蟽蟿慰 ''蟽蔚 蠂蟻蔚喂维味慰渭伪喂 纬喂伪蟿委 蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋''.
螝伪蟿维 蟿畏 纬谓蠋渭畏 渭慰蠀 蟿慰 蟺喂慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂慰 萎蟿伪谓 畏 蟺蟻慰蟽苇纬纬喂蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰 螛蔚蠈. 螣蠀蟽喂伪蟽蟿喂魏维 伪谓蟿喂蟺伪蟻伪胃苇蟿蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰蟿蔚位喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻委伪 蟿蠅谓 未蠀蟿喂魏蠋谓 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚喂蠋谓 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺伪蟻维未慰尉畏 位慰纬喂魏萎 蟿蠅谓 伪谓伪蟿慰位喂魏蠋谓 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚喂蠋谓. 螚 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰蟿蔚位喂魏萎 位慰纬喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委 蟺蠅蟼 伪谓 蟿慰 螒 蔚委谓伪喂 螒, 蟿蠈蟿蔚 蟿慰 螒 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪喂 渭畏 螒. 螖畏位伪未萎 蔚维谓 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻喂蟽蟿慰蠉渭蔚 蟺蠋蟼 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪位蠈蟼, 蟽畏渭伪委谓蔚喂 蠈蟿喂 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼. 螚 蟺伪蟻维未慰尉畏 位慰纬喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委 蟺蠅蟼 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蟽蠀位位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蠅蟼 伪谓蟿喂胃苇蟽蔚喂蟼 (伪谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 蟿慰 魏伪位蠈, 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 魏伪喂 蟿慰 魏伪魏蠈). 螘蠁蠈蟽慰谓 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蟿畏谓 蠀蟺苇蟻蟿伪蟿畏 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪, 魏伪谓苇谓伪蟼 胃蔚蟿喂魏蠈蟼 蟽蠂慰位喂伪蟽渭蠈蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁萎 蟿慰蠀 胃蔚委慰蠀 纬喂伪蟿委 苇蟿蟽喂 伪喂蠅蟻蔚委蟿伪喂 畏 喂未蔚维 蟺蠅蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂 魏伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼. 螒谓蟿' 伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟺蟻慰蟿喂渭慰蠉谓 蟿喂蟼 伪蟻谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪蟼 纬喂伪 蟺伪蟻维未蔚喂纬渭伪 ''慰 胃蔚蠈蟼 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼''.
''螝喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰, 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬谓蠅蟻委蟽蔚喂 蟿喂 蔚委谓伪喂 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼, 伪魏蠈渭伪 魏喂 伪谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪位维 蟿喂 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂! 螆蟿蟽喂, 纬蔚渭维蟿慰蟼 渭蔚 蟿慰 蟿委蟺慰蟿伪, 慰 谓慰蠀蟼 伪谓伪味畏蟿维 蔚蟺委渭慰谓伪 蟿慰 蠀蟺苇蟻蟿伪蟿慰 伪纬伪胃蠈''!!!
螖蔚 胃伪 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻喂味伪 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰 伪蠀蟿蠈 蠅蟼 尾喂尾位委慰 伪蠀蟿慰尾慰萎胃蔚喂伪蟼, 蠀蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 苇谓谓慰喂伪 蟺蠅蟼 未蔚谓 蟽慰蠀 蠀蟺慰未蔚喂魏谓蠉蔚喂 蟿喂 谓伪 魏维谓蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蠋蟼. 螕蟻伪渭渭苇谓慰 伪蟺蠈 苇谓伪谓 纬蔚蟻渭伪谓慰蔚尾蟻伪委慰 蠁喂位蠈蟽慰蠁慰, 蠄蠀蠂伪谓伪位蠀蟿萎 魏伪喂 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠈 伪谓伪位蠀蟿萎 蟺慰蠀 苇味畏蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蟿蠅谓 渭蔚纬维位蠅谓 蟺慰位苇渭蠅谓 (1900 - 1980) 魏伪喂 维蟻伪 蔚蟺畏蟻蔚维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚尾蟻伪蠆魏慰蠉蟼 未喂蠅纬渭慰蠉蟼, 蔚尉蔚蟿维味蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 蟺慰位喂蟿喂蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蔚魏蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪位维尾蔚喂 纬喂伪蟿委 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蟽魏苇蠁蟿蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟽魏苇蠁蟿蔚蟿伪喂, 纬喂伪蟿委 未蟻伪 蠈蟺蠅蟼 未蟻伪, 纬喂伪蟿委 蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚喂 蟽蔚 蠈蟽伪 蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚喂. 韦喂 蠀蟺慰魏喂谓蔚委 蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 蟿慰蠀 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺慰未蔚魏蟿蠈蟼 魏伪喂 伪尉喂伪纬维蟺畏蟿慰蟼; 螘委谓伪喂 苇谓伪 尾喂尾位委慰 蟺慰蠀 蟽蔚 伪谓伪纬魏维味蔚喂 谓伪 蟽魏蔚蠁蟿蔚委蟼, 谓伪 未喂伪蠁蠅谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼, 谓伪 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蔚谓 渭苇蟻蔚喂, 谓伪 蟿伪蠀蟿喂蟽蟿蔚委蟼 蟺位萎蟻蠅蟼 萎 委蟽蠅蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 未蔚喂蟼 蟿蠀蟺蠅渭苇谓蔚蟼 蟽蟿慰 蠂伪蟻蟿委 渭蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 未喂魏苇蟼 蟽慰蠀 伪味蠉渭蠅蟿蔚蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼.
韦慰 魏伪魏蠈 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 慰喂 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰喂 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰喂 胃蔚蠅蟻慰蠉谓 蟺蠅蟼 畏 蟺蟻维尉畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蔚蠉魏慰位畏 魏伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 蟿慰 未蠉蟽魏慰位慰 蔚委谓伪喂 谓伪 尾蟻蔚委蟼 蟿慰 魏伪蟿维位位畏位慰 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚委渭蔚谓慰, 苇谓伪谓 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰 未畏位伪未萎 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委蟼 维尉喂慰 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟽蔚 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂. 螝伪喂 蔚蠁蠈蟽慰谓 蟽蟿慰 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓慰 魏蠈蟽渭慰 慰 魏维胃蔚 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蔚蟺喂位苇纬蔚喂 渭蠈谓慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟿慰 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚委渭蔚谓慰 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 (蟽蔚 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟽畏 渭蔚 蟺伪位伪喂蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀谓萎胃蠅蟼 蠀蟺萎蟻蠂蔚 渭蔚蟽维味蠅谓), 伪蠀蟿蠈 蔚谓喂蟽蠂蠉蔚喂 蟿畏谓 伪尉委伪 蟿慰蠀 伪谓蟿喂魏蔚喂渭苇谓慰蠀 魏伪喂 蠀蟺慰尾伪胃渭委味蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 蟿畏谓 伪尉委伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻维尉畏蟼. 螝伪喂 纬喂伪 伪蠀蟿蠈: ''危蠂蔚未蠈谓 魏伪渭喂维 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃蔚喂伪, 魏伪谓苇谓伪 苇蟻纬慰, 未蔚谓 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 渭蔚 蟿蠈蟽慰 渭蔚纬维位蔚蟼 蔚位蟺委未蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽未慰魏委蔚蟼, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 畏 伪纬维蟺畏, 魏伪喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰 蟿委蟺慰蟿伪 未蔚谓 伪蟺慰蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蟿蠈蟽慰 蟽蠀蠂谓维 蠈蟽慰 伪蠀蟿萎''.
螒蠀蟿蠈 蟺慰蠀 渭伪谓喂蠅未蠋蟼 蔚蟺喂胃蠀渭蔚委 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 魏伪胃'蠈位畏 蟿畏 未喂维蟻魏蔚喂伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 伪蟺慰蠁蠀纬萎 蟿畏蟼 渭慰谓伪尉喂维蟼 渭苇蟽蠅 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚 维位位慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蠈渭蠅蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀谓萎胃蠅蟼 蟺蔚蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蠄蔚蠀蟿慰蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽畏 蟺慰蠀 魏伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻伪 胃伪 蟿畏 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿畏蟻委味伪渭蔚 蟽蠀渭渭蠈蟻蠁蠅蟽畏 魏伪喂 蠀蟺慰蟿伪纬萎. 螖喂蠈蟿喂 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟺蔚蟿蠉蠂蔚喂 渭喂伪 蟽蠀谓苇谓蠅蟽畏 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺蠅谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰 蠋蟻喂渭慰 蟽蠀谓伪委蟽胃畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 未喂伪蟿萎蟻畏蟽畏蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪蟿慰渭喂魏萎蟼 伪魏蔚蟻伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼. 螠蔚 位委纬伪 位蠈纬喂伪 ''螐蟻喂渭畏 伪纬维蟺畏 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽畏 蠈蟺慰蠀 未蠉慰 维蟿慰渭伪 纬委谓慰谓蟿伪喂 苇谓伪 魏伪喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰 蟺伪蟻伪渭苇谓慰蠀谓 未蠉慰'' !!
螕喂伪 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏维蟺慰喂慰谓 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 蟺蟻蠋蟿伪 谓伪 伪蟺慰未蔚蠂蟿蔚委蟼 蠈蟿喂 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰蠀 未蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏慰渭渭维蟿喂伪 蟿慰蠀 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟽慰蠀. 螒位位维 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 伪谓蟿喂位畏蠁胃蔚委蟼 蟿慰 未蠈蟽喂渭慰 蠈蠂喂 蠅蟼 蠂维蟽喂渭慰, 伪位位维 蠅蟼 伪蟺蠈未蔚喂尉畏 蟿慰蠀 蟺位慰蠉蟿慰蠀 蟽慰蠀. ''螤位慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿蠈蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂蔚喂, 伪位位维 伪蠀蟿蠈蟼 蟺慰蠀 未委谓蔚喂''. 螒谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂蟼 蟿畏谓 蟿苇蠂谓畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委蟼 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺维蟼 苇谓伪 渭蠈谓慰 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚委蟽伪喂 伪未喂维蠁慰蟻慰蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰谓 蠀蟺蠈位慰喂蟺慰 魏蠈蟽渭慰 伪蠁慰蠉 畏 蟺蟻维尉畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 未蔚谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蟻喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼: ''螒谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 伪纬伪蟺蠋 苇谓伪谓 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蠈位慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟿畏 味蠅萎. 螒谓 渭蟺慰蟻蠋 谓伪 蟺蠅 蟽蔚 魏维蟺慰喂慰谓 维位位慰 蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋, 蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂 谓伪 蔚委渭伪喂 喂魏伪谓蠈蟼 谓伪 蟺蠅 伪纬伪蟺蠋 蟽蔚 蟽苇谓伪 蠈位慰蠀蟼, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 蟽苇谓伪 蠈位慰 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰, 伪纬伪蟺蠋 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟽苇谓伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭慰蠀'' !!! (螝喂 伪纬伪蟺蠋 魏喂 蠈位慰 蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰 纬喂伪蟿委 味蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟽蠉 渭伪味委..)
违蟺蠈 蟿慰 蟺蟻委蟽渭伪 伪蠀蟿蠈 蔚尉蔚蟿维味蔚喂 蠈位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 渭慰蟻蠁苇蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼: 蟿畏 渭畏蟿蟻喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 伪未蔚蟻蠁喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 蔚蟻蠅蟿喂魏萎, 蟿畏谓 伪纬维蟺畏 蟽蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪纬维蟺畏 蟽蟿慰 螛蔚蠈 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蠋谓蟿伪蟼 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪位维尾蔚喂 蟺蠋蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 谓畏蟺喂伪魏蠈 蟽蟿维未喂慰 ''伪纬伪蟺蠋 纬喂伪蟿委 伪纬伪蟺喂苇渭伪喂'' 蟺蔚蟻谓维渭蔚 蟽蟿慰 蠋蟻喂渭慰 蟽蟿维未喂慰 ''伪纬伪蟺喂苇渭伪喂 纬喂伪蟿委 伪纬伪蟺蠋''. 螤蠋蟼 伪蟺'蟿慰 ''蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋 纬喂伪蟿委 蟽蔚 蠂蟻蔚喂维味慰渭伪喂'' 蟺蔚蟻谓维渭蔚 蟽蟿慰 ''蟽蔚 蠂蟻蔚喂维味慰渭伪喂 纬喂伪蟿委 蟽'伪纬伪蟺蠋''.
螝伪蟿维 蟿畏 纬谓蠋渭畏 渭慰蠀 蟿慰 蟺喂慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂慰 萎蟿伪谓 畏 蟺蟻慰蟽苇纬纬喂蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰 螛蔚蠈. 螣蠀蟽喂伪蟽蟿喂魏维 伪谓蟿喂蟺伪蟻伪胃苇蟿蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰蟿蔚位喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻委伪 蟿蠅谓 未蠀蟿喂魏蠋谓 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚喂蠋谓 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺伪蟻维未慰尉畏 位慰纬喂魏萎 蟿蠅谓 伪谓伪蟿慰位喂魏蠋谓 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚喂蠋谓. 螚 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰蟿蔚位喂魏萎 位慰纬喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委 蟺蠅蟼 伪谓 蟿慰 螒 蔚委谓伪喂 螒, 蟿蠈蟿蔚 蟿慰 螒 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪喂 渭畏 螒. 螖畏位伪未萎 蔚维谓 喂蟽蠂蠀蟻喂蟽蟿慰蠉渭蔚 蟺蠋蟼 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪位蠈蟼, 蟽畏渭伪委谓蔚喂 蠈蟿喂 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼. 螚 蟺伪蟻维未慰尉畏 位慰纬喂魏萎 胃蔚蠅蟻蔚委 蟺蠅蟼 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蟽蠀位位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蠅蟼 伪谓蟿喂胃苇蟽蔚喂蟼 (伪谓 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 蟿慰 魏伪位蠈, 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 魏伪喂 蟿慰 魏伪魏蠈). 螘蠁蠈蟽慰谓 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位蔚委 蟿畏谓 蠀蟺苇蟻蟿伪蟿畏 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪, 魏伪谓苇谓伪蟼 胃蔚蟿喂魏蠈蟼 蟽蠂慰位喂伪蟽渭蠈蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁萎 蟿慰蠀 胃蔚委慰蠀 纬喂伪蟿委 苇蟿蟽喂 伪喂蠅蟻蔚委蟿伪喂 畏 喂未蔚维 蟺蠅蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬委谓蔚喂 魏伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼. 螒谓蟿' 伪蠀蟿慰蠉 蟺蟻慰蟿喂渭慰蠉谓 蟿喂蟼 伪蟻谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪蟼 纬喂伪 蟺伪蟻维未蔚喂纬渭伪 ''慰 胃蔚蠈蟼 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 魏伪魏蠈蟼''.
''螝喂 蠅蟽蟿蠈蟽慰, 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 纬谓蠅蟻委蟽蔚喂 蟿喂 蔚委谓伪喂 慰 螛蔚蠈蟼, 伪魏蠈渭伪 魏喂 伪谓 纬谓蠅蟻委味蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪位维 蟿喂 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂! 螆蟿蟽喂, 纬蔚渭维蟿慰蟼 渭蔚 蟿慰 蟿委蟺慰蟿伪, 慰 谓慰蠀蟼 伪谓伪味畏蟿维 蔚蟺委渭慰谓伪 蟿慰 蠀蟺苇蟻蟿伪蟿慰 伪纬伪胃蠈''!!!
螖蔚 胃伪 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻喂味伪 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰 伪蠀蟿蠈 蠅蟼 尾喂尾位委慰 伪蠀蟿慰尾慰萎胃蔚喂伪蟼, 蠀蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 苇谓谓慰喂伪 蟺蠅蟼 未蔚谓 蟽慰蠀 蠀蟺慰未蔚喂魏谓蠉蔚喂 蟿喂 谓伪 魏维谓蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蠋蟼. 螕蟻伪渭渭苇谓慰 伪蟺蠈 苇谓伪谓 纬蔚蟻渭伪谓慰蔚尾蟻伪委慰 蠁喂位蠈蟽慰蠁慰, 蠄蠀蠂伪谓伪位蠀蟿萎 魏伪喂 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠈 伪谓伪位蠀蟿萎 蟺慰蠀 苇味畏蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蟿蠅谓 渭蔚纬维位蠅谓 蟺慰位苇渭蠅谓 (1900 - 1980) 魏伪喂 维蟻伪 蔚蟺畏蟻蔚维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚尾蟻伪蠆魏慰蠉蟼 未喂蠅纬渭慰蠉蟼, 蔚尉蔚蟿维味蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 蟺慰位喂蟿喂蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蔚魏蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪位维尾蔚喂 纬喂伪蟿委 慰 维谓胃蟻蠅蟺慰蟼 蟽魏苇蠁蟿蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蟽魏苇蠁蟿蔚蟿伪喂, 纬喂伪蟿委 未蟻伪 蠈蟺蠅蟼 未蟻伪, 纬喂伪蟿委 蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚喂 蟽蔚 蠈蟽伪 蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚喂. 韦喂 蠀蟺慰魏喂谓蔚委 蟿畏谓 伪谓维纬魏畏 蟿慰蠀 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀 谓伪 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺慰未蔚魏蟿蠈蟼 魏伪喂 伪尉喂伪纬维蟺畏蟿慰蟼; 螘委谓伪喂 苇谓伪 尾喂尾位委慰 蟺慰蠀 蟽蔚 伪谓伪纬魏维味蔚喂 谓伪 蟽魏蔚蠁蟿蔚委蟼, 谓伪 未喂伪蠁蠅谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼, 谓伪 蟽蠀渭蠁蠅谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 蔚谓 渭苇蟻蔚喂, 谓伪 蟿伪蠀蟿喂蟽蟿蔚委蟼 蟺位萎蟻蠅蟼 萎 委蟽蠅蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 未蔚喂蟼 蟿蠀蟺蠅渭苇谓蔚蟼 蟽蟿慰 蠂伪蟻蟿委 渭蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 未喂魏苇蟼 蟽慰蠀 伪味蠉渭蠅蟿蔚蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼.
March 11, 2014
廿匕丕 兀丨亘亘賳丕 卮禺氐丕賸 賮廿賳賳丕 賳丨鬲乇賲賴.. 廿賳 賲毓賳賶 丕賱廿丨鬲乇丕賲 賴賳丕 賴賵 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 鬲賯亘賱 賲賳 賳丨亘 賰賲丕 賴賵貙 鬲賯亘賱 匕丕鬲賴 丕賱賮乇賷丿丞 毓賳丕. 兀乇賷丿 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱匕賷 兀丨亘賴 兀賳 賷夭丿賴乇 賵賷賳賲賵 賲賳 兀噩賱賴 賴賵貙 賱丕 賲賳 兀噩賱賷 兀賳丕.. 兀乇賷丿 兀賳 兀丨亘賴 賰賲丕 賴賵貙 賵兀賳 兀卮毓乇 亘賴 賰賲丕 賷乇賷丿 兀賳 賷賰賵賳貙 賵賱賷爻 賰賲丕 兀乇賷丿 兀賳 賷賰賵賳.
廿匕丕 兀丨亘亘賳丕 卮禺氐丕賸 賮廿賳賳丕 賳丨鬲乇賲 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賱丞貙 丕賱廿丨鬲乇丕賲 賷賰賵賳 賲亘賳賷丕賸 毓賱賶 兀爻爻 丕賱丨乇賷丞. "丕賱丨亘 賴賵 賵賱賷丿 丕賱丨乇賷丞"貙 賵賱賷爻 賵賱賷丿 丕賱爻賷胤乇丞*.賴
April 20, 2020
賰鬲丕亘 毓馗賷賲 噩丿丕貙
鬲購賳卮乇 丕賱賲賯鬲胤賮丕鬲 賱丕丨賯丕貙 賱丕 賲賯鬲胤賮丕鬲 丕賷賴貙 賷賳卮乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 匕丕鬲 賳賮爻賴 賱丕丨賯丕.
鬲購賳卮乇 丕賱賲賯鬲胤賮丕鬲 賱丕丨賯丕貙 賱丕 賲賯鬲胤賮丕鬲 丕賷賴貙 賷賳卮乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 匕丕鬲 賳賮爻賴 賱丕丨賯丕.
January 31, 2020
鈥淟ove is not only a relationship with a specific person; it is an attitude, a guiding of our character that determines the type of relationship of a person has with the world as a whole, not with an object or a person.鈥�
February 24, 2020
听听 "賱丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱丨亘 賲賲賰賳丕 丕賱丕 廿匕丕 鬲賵丕氐賱 卮禺氐丕賳 賲毓丕 賲賳 賲乇賰夭 賵噩賵丿賴賲丕 貙 賵賲賳 孬賲 廿匕丕 毓丕卮 賰賱 賲賳賴賲丕 賳賮爻賴 賲賳 賲乇賰夭 賵噩賵丿賴 賮賷 賴匕丞 (丕賱廿毓丕卮丞 丕賱賲乇賰夭賷丞) 鬲賰賲賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳賷丞 貙 賴賳丕 賮賯胤 鬲賰賲賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 貙 賴賳丕 賮賯胤 賷賵噩丿 兀爻丕爻 丕賱丨賷丕丞 貙 賮丕賱丨亘 賴賵 鬲丨丿 丿丕卅賲 賵 賱賷爻 賲爻鬲賯乇丕 賱賱乇丕丨丞 貙 亘賱 賴賵 鬲丨乇賰 賵賳賲賵 賵毓賲賱 賲卮鬲乇賰 貙 丨鬲賷 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 賴賳丕賰 鬲賳丕睾賲 丕賵 氐乇丕毓 貙 賮乇丨 兀賵 賰丕賳 賴賳丕賱賰 丨夭賳 貙 賮賴賲賷 賲噩乇丿 賲爻丕卅賱 孬丕賳賵賷丞 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賱丨亘 "
賷鬲丨丿孬 廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘 氐睾賷乇 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 賲賰孬賮 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賷 毓賳 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 貙 賷乇賷 兀賵賱丕賸 賮乇賵賲 兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 丨丕噩丞 賱賱丨亘 賱賯賴乇 廿丨爻丕爻賴 亘丕賱賵丨丿丞 賳鬲賷噩丞 廿賳賮氐丕賱賴 毓賳 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 賮兀氐賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賴賵 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 - 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賱賷爻鬲 賲賳 賳賮爻 胤賷賳丞 丕賱噩爻丿 - 賱匕賱賰 賷賱噩兀 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賱丨亘 賰胤乇賷賯 爻乇賷毓 賵賱賰賳 賲賱賷卅 亘丕賱賲禺丕胤乇 賱賱毓賵丿丞 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賷 貙 亘丿丕賷丞 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 賷鬲賱賯丕賴 丕賱胤賮賱 賲賳 丕賱兀賲 賷亘丿亍 廿丿賲丕賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賱賱丨亘 賵丕賱兀賴鬲賲丕賲 賵丕賱兀賲 賴賳丕 賴賷 丕賱賲氐丿乇 丕賱丕賵賱 賵丕賱丕賯賵賷 賱賴 賮賴賷 鬲毓胤賷 丕賱丨亘 亘賱丕 廿賳鬲馗丕乇 丕賵 鬲賮賰乇 賮賷 丕賱毓丕卅丿 丕賱卮禺氐賷 賱賴丕 賲賳 廿毓胤丕卅賴 貙 賮賷 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賷亘丿亍 丕賱胤賮賱 鬲毓賱賯賴 亘丕賱兀亘 貙 賵丕賱兀亘 毓賱賷 禺賱丕賮 丕賱兀賲 丕賱丨亘 毓賳丿賴 賲卮乇賵胤 亘丕賱兀賮毓丕賱 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯賵賲 亘賴丕 丕賱胤賮賱 賮廿匕丕 兀丨爻賳 丕賱賮毓賱 鬲賱賯賷 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱孬賳丕亍 賵廿匕丕 兀爻丕亍 鬲毓乇囟 丕賱胤賮賱 賱賱鬲賵亘賷禺 賵丕賱匕賲 貙 賷乇賷 賮乇賵賲 兀賳 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丕賵賱賷 賱賱丨亘 毓賳丿 丕賱胤賮賱 鬲卮賰賱 丕賱囟賲賷乇 丕賱亘卮乇賷 貙 賮丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱爻賵賷 賷丨亘 丕賱禺賷乇 賱賳賮爻賴 賵賱賱兀禺乇賷賳 (丨亘 丕賱兀賲) 賵賷賮賰乇 賮賷 毓賵丕賯亘 兀賮毓丕賱賴 賯亘賱 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴丕 (丨亘 丕賱兀亘) .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賷賯爻賲 賮乇賵賲 丕賱丨亘 賱 5 兀賳賵丕毓 鬲乇鬲亘 丨爻亘 兀爻亘賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賱賯賷 (丕賱丨亘 兀賲賵賲賷 -丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 - 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷 - 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 - 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 ) 貙 賷乇賷 賮賷乇賵賲 兀賳 兀賷 廿禺鬲賱丕賱 賮賷 賲乇丨賱丞 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丨亘 丕賱禺賲爻丞 賷丐丿賷 賱賲卮丕賰賱 鬲鬲乇爻亘 賵鬲亘賯賷 賮賷 丕賱毓賯賱 丕賱亘丕胤賳 貙 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷亘丿亍 亘丨亘 兀賲賴 賵丨亘 賵丕賱丿賴 兀賵賱丕賸 孬賲 賷賳鬲賯賱 賱丨亘 兀禺賵鬲賴 賵丨亘 兀氐丿賯丕卅賴 賵毓賳丿 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賷亘丿 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 匕丕鬲賴 - 賯丿 賷亘丿亍 丕賱亘毓囟 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳賴丕 賯亘賱 丕賱亘賱賵睾 - 孬賲 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷 賰賲乇丨賱丞 兀爻丕爻賷丞 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賵賱賷爻 賰爻亘亘 兀爻丕爻賷 賱賱丨亘 賵賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀毓馗賲 賵賴賵 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 貙 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 毓賳丿 賮乇賵賲 賴賵 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀毓馗賲 賮賮賷賴 賷噩丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賳賮爻賴 賵匕丕鬲賴 賵賷氐賱 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賮鬲賯丿賴丕 (賱丕丨馗 鬲兀孬乇 賮乇賵賲 亘丕賱氐賵賮賷賴) 賮亘賷賳 丕賱氐賱丕賴 兀賵 廿毓賲丕乇 丕賱兀乇囟 兀賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷 亘丕賱兀禺賱丕賯 丕賱賯賵賲賷丞 賷丨亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賳賮爻賴 賵賲賳 孬賲 賷亘丿亍 賷丨亘 丕賱兀禺乇賷賳 .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 賷卮乇丨 賮賷乇賵賲 賲賮賴锟斤拷賲 丕賱爻賷賵賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓乇囟 賱賴 丕賱丨亘 亘爻亘亘 賳賲胤 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷賴 貙 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 賷鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賲爻鬲賴賱賰 賵賷鬲丨賵賱 賰賱 賲丕 賷丨賷胤 亘賴 賱賲賳鬲噩 賲丨鬲賲賱 賷賲賰賳 廿爻鬲禺丿丕賲賴 賮賷賲丕 亘毓丿 貙 賷毓鬲亘乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 賲卮丕毓乇賴 賰賲賳鬲噩 兀賷囟丕賸 賷賲賳丨賴 賱賲賳 賷爻鬲丨賯 賵賷賳鬲馗乇 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱賯亘賵賱 賲賲賳 賷乇丕賴 賲賳丕爻亘丕賸 賱胤亘賯鬲賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 兀賵 賲爻丕賵賷 賱賴 賮賷 丕賱禺賵丕氐 丕賱卮賰賱賷賴 兀賵 丕賱賲丕丿賷丞 賵賴賵 賲丕 兀賮爻丿 丕賱丨亘 亘兀賳賵丕毓賴 賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓賳丕 貙 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷丨亘 氐丿賷賯賴 賮賯胤 賱賰賷 賷爻鬲賮賷丿 賲賳賴 賮賷 賵賯鬲 賲丕 貙 賷丨亘 賮鬲丕賴 賮賯胤 賱兀賳賴 賷乇丕賴 賲賳丕爻亘賴 賱卮賰賱賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷 丕賵 爻鬲賮賷丿 卮賰賱賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷 丕賵 賷乇丕賴丕 噩匕丕亘賴 賵賷賴賲賱 鬲賲丕賲丕 丕賱丨丕噩丞 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 賱賱丨亘 兀賱丕 賵賴賷 丕賱廿賳丿賲丕噩 賲毓 丕賱兀禺乇 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 丕賱廿孬賳丕賳 卮禺氐 賵丕丨丿 賲賲丕 賷鬲胤賱亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱丿賷賴賲 賴賲丕 丕賱廿孬賳丕賳 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱丨賵丕乇 賵丕賱鬲賯丕乇亘 丕賱賮賰乇賷 .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賵賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 卮乇丨 賮乇賵賲 丕賱賲卮丕賰賱 丕賱賳丕鬲噩丞 亘爻亘亘 丕賱廿禺賮丕賯 賮賷 兀賷 賲乇丨賱丞 賲賳 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱禺賲爻 丕賱賲匕賰賵乇賴 兀毓賱丕賴 貙 賮賯丿 賷毓鬲賲丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿毓鬲賲丕丿丕賸 鬲丕賲丕 毓賱賷 卮乇賷賰賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕賴 賳鬲賷噩丞 廿賮鬲賯丕丿賴 賱賱丨亘 賲賳 丕賱兀賲 丕賵 丕賱兀亘 賮賷 賲乇丨賱丞 丕賱胤賮賵賱賴 兀賵 賯丿 賷毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賷 丕賱賵丕賱丿賷賳 賳鬲賷噩丞 毓丿賲 鬲禺賱氐賴 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丨亘 丕賱胤賮賵賱賷 丨鬲賷 丕賱兀賳 (賳馗乇賷丞 賮乇賵賷丿 賮賷 鬲賮爻賷乇 兀爻亘丕亘 丕賱丨亘) 貙 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 貙 賵賮賳 丕賱丨亘 賲賳 賵噩賴丞 賳馗乇 賮乇賵賲 賲孬賱 兀賷 賮賳 賮賷 丨丕噩丞 賱賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵丕賱氐亘乇 賵丕賱廿爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱鬲囟丨賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賯丕乇亘 丕賱賮賰乇賷 賲賳 丕賱噩丕賳亘賷賳 賰賲丕 賷鬲賲賳賷 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱賱丨亘 賵氐賮丞 爻丨乇賷丞 賱兀賷 賲賳丕 賵賱賰賳 丕賱丨亘 賰賲丕 丕賱丿賷賳 - 賰賲丕 賵氐賮賴 賮乇賵賲 賳賮爻賴 - 鬲噩乇亘丞 乇賵丨賷丞 鬲禺鬲賱賮 賲賳 卮禺氐 賱兀禺乇 丕賱賲賴賲 兀賳 賱丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱丨亘 賲賯氐賵乇丕賸 毓賱賷 卮禺氐 丿賵賳 睾賷乇賴 賮賲賳 賱丕 賷丨亘 丕賱賳丕爻 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷丨亘 賳賮爻賴 .
賷鬲丨丿孬 廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘 氐睾賷乇 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 賲賰孬賮 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賷 毓賳 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 貙 賷乇賷 兀賵賱丕賸 賮乇賵賲 兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 丨丕噩丞 賱賱丨亘 賱賯賴乇 廿丨爻丕爻賴 亘丕賱賵丨丿丞 賳鬲賷噩丞 廿賳賮氐丕賱賴 毓賳 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 賮兀氐賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賴賵 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 - 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賱賷爻鬲 賲賳 賳賮爻 胤賷賳丞 丕賱噩爻丿 - 賱匕賱賰 賷賱噩兀 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賱丨亘 賰胤乇賷賯 爻乇賷毓 賵賱賰賳 賲賱賷卅 亘丕賱賲禺丕胤乇 賱賱毓賵丿丞 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賷 貙 亘丿丕賷丞 賲賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕賷 賷鬲賱賯丕賴 丕賱胤賮賱 賲賳 丕賱兀賲 賷亘丿亍 廿丿賲丕賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賱賱丨亘 賵丕賱兀賴鬲賲丕賲 賵丕賱兀賲 賴賳丕 賴賷 丕賱賲氐丿乇 丕賱丕賵賱 賵丕賱丕賯賵賷 賱賴 賮賴賷 鬲毓胤賷 丕賱丨亘 亘賱丕 廿賳鬲馗丕乇 丕賵 鬲賮賰乇 賮賷 丕賱毓丕卅丿 丕賱卮禺氐賷 賱賴丕 賲賳 廿毓胤丕卅賴 貙 賮賷 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賷亘丿亍 丕賱胤賮賱 鬲毓賱賯賴 亘丕賱兀亘 貙 賵丕賱兀亘 毓賱賷 禺賱丕賮 丕賱兀賲 丕賱丨亘 毓賳丿賴 賲卮乇賵胤 亘丕賱兀賮毓丕賱 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯賵賲 亘賴丕 丕賱胤賮賱 賮廿匕丕 兀丨爻賳 丕賱賮毓賱 鬲賱賯賷 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱孬賳丕亍 賵廿匕丕 兀爻丕亍 鬲毓乇囟 丕賱胤賮賱 賱賱鬲賵亘賷禺 賵丕賱匕賲 貙 賷乇賷 賮乇賵賲 兀賳 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丕賵賱賷 賱賱丨亘 毓賳丿 丕賱胤賮賱 鬲卮賰賱 丕賱囟賲賷乇 丕賱亘卮乇賷 貙 賮丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱爻賵賷 賷丨亘 丕賱禺賷乇 賱賳賮爻賴 賵賱賱兀禺乇賷賳 (丨亘 丕賱兀賲) 賵賷賮賰乇 賮賷 毓賵丕賯亘 兀賮毓丕賱賴 賯亘賱 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴丕 (丨亘 丕賱兀亘) .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賷賯爻賲 賮乇賵賲 丕賱丨亘 賱 5 兀賳賵丕毓 鬲乇鬲亘 丨爻亘 兀爻亘賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賱賯賷 (丕賱丨亘 兀賲賵賲賷 -丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 - 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷 - 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 - 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 ) 貙 賷乇賷 賮賷乇賵賲 兀賳 兀賷 廿禺鬲賱丕賱 賮賷 賲乇丨賱丞 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丨亘 丕賱禺賲爻丞 賷丐丿賷 賱賲卮丕賰賱 鬲鬲乇爻亘 賵鬲亘賯賷 賮賷 丕賱毓賯賱 丕賱亘丕胤賳 貙 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷亘丿亍 亘丨亘 兀賲賴 賵丨亘 賵丕賱丿賴 兀賵賱丕賸 孬賲 賷賳鬲賯賱 賱丨亘 兀禺賵鬲賴 賵丨亘 兀氐丿賯丕卅賴 賵毓賳丿 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賷亘丿 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 匕丕鬲賴 - 賯丿 賷亘丿亍 丕賱亘毓囟 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳賴丕 賯亘賱 丕賱亘賱賵睾 - 孬賲 丕賱丨亘 丕賱卮亘賯賷 賰賲乇丨賱丞 兀爻丕爻賷丞 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賵賱賷爻 賰爻亘亘 兀爻丕爻賷 賱賱丨亘 賵賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀毓馗賲 賵賴賵 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 貙 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 毓賳丿 賮乇賵賲 賴賵 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀毓馗賲 賮賮賷賴 賷噩丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賳賮爻賴 賵匕丕鬲賴 賵賷氐賱 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賮鬲賯丿賴丕 (賱丕丨馗 鬲兀孬乇 賮乇賵賲 亘丕賱氐賵賮賷賴) 賮亘賷賳 丕賱氐賱丕賴 兀賵 廿毓賲丕乇 丕賱兀乇囟 兀賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷 亘丕賱兀禺賱丕賯 丕賱賯賵賲賷丞 賷丨亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賳賮爻賴 賵賲賳 孬賲 賷亘丿亍 賷丨亘 丕賱兀禺乇賷賳 .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 賷卮乇丨 賮賷乇賵賲 賲賮賴锟斤拷賲 丕賱爻賷賵賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓乇囟 賱賴 丕賱丨亘 亘爻亘亘 賳賲胤 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷賴 貙 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 賷鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賲爻鬲賴賱賰 賵賷鬲丨賵賱 賰賱 賲丕 賷丨賷胤 亘賴 賱賲賳鬲噩 賲丨鬲賲賱 賷賲賰賳 廿爻鬲禺丿丕賲賴 賮賷賲丕 亘毓丿 貙 賷毓鬲亘乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 賲卮丕毓乇賴 賰賲賳鬲噩 兀賷囟丕賸 賷賲賳丨賴 賱賲賳 賷爻鬲丨賯 賵賷賳鬲馗乇 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱賯亘賵賱 賲賲賳 賷乇丕賴 賲賳丕爻亘丕賸 賱胤亘賯鬲賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 兀賵 賲爻丕賵賷 賱賴 賮賷 丕賱禺賵丕氐 丕賱卮賰賱賷賴 兀賵 丕賱賲丕丿賷丞 賵賴賵 賲丕 兀賮爻丿 丕賱丨亘 亘兀賳賵丕毓賴 賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓賳丕 貙 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷丨亘 氐丿賷賯賴 賮賯胤 賱賰賷 賷爻鬲賮賷丿 賲賳賴 賮賷 賵賯鬲 賲丕 貙 賷丨亘 賮鬲丕賴 賮賯胤 賱兀賳賴 賷乇丕賴 賲賳丕爻亘賴 賱卮賰賱賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷 丕賵 爻鬲賮賷丿 卮賰賱賴 丕賱廿噩鬲賲丕毓賷 丕賵 賷乇丕賴丕 噩匕丕亘賴 賵賷賴賲賱 鬲賲丕賲丕 丕賱丨丕噩丞 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 賱賱丨亘 兀賱丕 賵賴賷 丕賱廿賳丿賲丕噩 賲毓 丕賱兀禺乇 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 丕賱廿孬賳丕賳 卮禺氐 賵丕丨丿 賲賲丕 賷鬲胤賱亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱丿賷賴賲 賴賲丕 丕賱廿孬賳丕賳 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賷 丕賱丨賵丕乇 賵丕賱鬲賯丕乇亘 丕賱賮賰乇賷 .
賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賵賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 卮乇丨 賮乇賵賲 丕賱賲卮丕賰賱 丕賱賳丕鬲噩丞 亘爻亘亘 丕賱廿禺賮丕賯 賮賷 兀賷 賲乇丨賱丞 賲賳 丕賱賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱禺賲爻 丕賱賲匕賰賵乇賴 兀毓賱丕賴 貙 賮賯丿 賷毓鬲賲丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿毓鬲賲丕丿丕賸 鬲丕賲丕 毓賱賷 卮乇賷賰賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕賴 賳鬲賷噩丞 廿賮鬲賯丕丿賴 賱賱丨亘 賲賳 丕賱兀賲 丕賵 丕賱兀亘 賮賷 賲乇丨賱丞 丕賱胤賮賵賱賴 兀賵 賯丿 賷毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賷 丕賱賵丕賱丿賷賳 賳鬲賷噩丞 毓丿賲 鬲禺賱氐賴 賲賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱丨亘 丕賱胤賮賵賱賷 丨鬲賷 丕賱兀賳 (賳馗乇賷丞 賮乇賵賷丿 賮賷 鬲賮爻賷乇 兀爻亘丕亘 丕賱丨亘) 貙 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 貙 賵賮賳 丕賱丨亘 賲賳 賵噩賴丞 賳馗乇 賮乇賵賲 賲孬賱 兀賷 賮賳 賮賷 丨丕噩丞 賱賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵丕賱氐亘乇 賵丕賱廿爻鬲毓丿丕丿 賱賱鬲囟丨賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賯丕乇亘 丕賱賮賰乇賷 賲賳 丕賱噩丕賳亘賷賳 賰賲丕 賷鬲賲賳賷 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱賱丨亘 賵氐賮丞 爻丨乇賷丞 賱兀賷 賲賳丕 賵賱賰賳 丕賱丨亘 賰賲丕 丕賱丿賷賳 - 賰賲丕 賵氐賮賴 賮乇賵賲 賳賮爻賴 - 鬲噩乇亘丞 乇賵丨賷丞 鬲禺鬲賱賮 賲賳 卮禺氐 賱兀禺乇 丕賱賲賴賲 兀賳 賱丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱丨亘 賲賯氐賵乇丕賸 毓賱賷 卮禺氐 丿賵賳 睾賷乇賴 賮賲賳 賱丕 賷丨亘 丕賱賳丕爻 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷丨亘 賳賮爻賴 .
June 20, 2019
丕賳 賰賳鬲 鬲鬲賵賯毓 兀賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 賵氐賮賴 賱賱丨亘 賮兀賳賰 丨鬲賲丕 爻鬲氐丕亘 亘丕賱禺賷亘丞馃榿..
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 氐睾賷乇 丕賱丨噩賲 貙賰亘賷乇 丕賱賲毓賳賶貙囟禺賲 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲.
鬲賳丕賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 亘胤丕亘毓 賮賱爻賮賷貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷賳丕賯卮 賵賷丨賱賱 丕賱丨亘貙 毓賳丿 賯乇丕亍丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷鬲囟丨 賱賰 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻 賮賯胤 鬲毓賱賯 卮禺氐 亘卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賷毓賳賷 兀賳賴 丨亘 !賵賱賷爻 賰賱 賲丕 賷乇賶 賮賷 丕賱廿毓賱丕賲 賵丕賱丕賮賱丕賲 賴賵 丨亘 . 兀氐亘丨 爻賱毓丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 爻賱毓丞 賲爻鬲賴賱賰賴.
毓賳丿賲丕 賵賱丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賲賳賮氐賱丕 亘丕鬲氐丕賱賴 丕賱卮丿賷丿 亘 丕賱兀賲 賮賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓鬲賳賷 亘賴 鬲賴鬲賲 亘賴 賵鬲乇丕毓賷賴 賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱賵丨丿賴 丕賱鬲賰丕賮賱賷丞 賱賰賳 毓賳丿賲丕 賵毓賶 賵兀氐亘丨 兀賰亘乇 賲賳 賯亘賱 丕賳賮氐賱 毓賳 賰賱 賴匕丕 賱匕賱賰 兀氐亘丨 賷亘丨孬 賱胤乇賷賯丞 兀禺乇賶 賷賵噩丿 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘賴丕 .
匕賰乇 廿乇賷賰 毓亘丕乇丞 :兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵賱丿 丕賵賱 賲乇丞 亘匕賱賰 丕賱丕鬲丨丕丿 丕賱匕賷 丨丿孬 賮賷 丕賱乇丨賲 賵賷賵賱丿 賲乇丞 孬丕賳賷丞 亘丕鬲丨丕丿 丕賱丨亘.
賵囟丨 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 (丨亘 賳丕囟噩 ) 賵匕賱賰 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱賲丨丕賮馗丞 毓賱賶 鬲賮乇丿賴 賵賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 匕丕鬲賴 兀賳 賷毓賷卮 匕丕鬲賴 亘丕賱賲賯丕亘賱 兀賳 賱丕 賷氐亘丨 賴賵 丕賱胤乇賮 丕賱丌禺乇 賷亘賯賶 賲丨丕賮馗 毓賱賶 賰賷丕賳賴 賵毓賱賶 兀爻賱賵亘賴 兀賳 賱丕 賷睾賷乇賴 賵賷氐亘丨 賳爻禺賴 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱匕賷 賷乇賷丿賴.
賱賲 賷鬲賰賱賲 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 毓賳 丕賱毓丕卮賯 賵丕賱毓丕卮賯賴 亘賱 胤乇丨 賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘 亘卮賰賱 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賲丕賲丕 貙鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀亘賵賷 貙毓賳 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 貙毓賳 丨亘 丕賱兀賲 貙 毓賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵兀賵囟丨 兀賳 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷丨亘 匕丕鬲賴 兀賳 賱賲 賷爻鬲胤毓 兀賳 賷丨亘 匕丕鬲賴 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賷丨亘 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳. 賱匕賱賰 兀賵囟丨 兀賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賱賷爻 兀賳丕賳賷丞 丨爻亘 賲丕 賷賯賵賱賵賳賴 丕賱賳丕爻 賵賲丕 賴賵 賲鬲丿丕賵賱 亘賷賳賴賲 亘賱 毓賱賶 丕賱毓賰爻 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲賷 賴賵 兀爻丕爻 丨亘 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳.
毓賳丿 賯乇丕卅鬲賰 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 賲賯賵賱丞 (賱丕 卮賷亍 兀爻賴賱 賲賳 丕賱丨亘)亘賱 鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳 賵丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲乇賷丿 兀賳 鬲丨氐賱 毓賱賷賴 毓賱賷賰 賲毓乇賮丞 兀爻丕爻 匕賱賰 丕賱賮賳 .
賲賴賲丕 鬲賰賱賲鬲 賱丕 丕爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 兀賵氐賱 丕賱賮賰乇賴 賵丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賴丕卅賱丞 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賵丕賱賰孬賷乇貙 兀禺匕鬲 賵賯鬲 胤賵賷賱 賮賷 賯乇丕亍鬲丞 乇睾賲 氐睾乇賴 賱賰賳 賱丕 兀乇賷丿 丕賯乇兀賴 毓賱賶 丕賱爻乇毓賴 賯乇兀鬲賴 亘鬲兀賳賷 賵賮賴賲鬲賴 氐賮丨丞 氐賮丨丞貙 鬲毓賱賲鬲 賲賳賴 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲賮乇丿丕鬲.
兀賵賱 鬲噩乇亘賴 賱賷 賲毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵兀賵賱 賲乇賴 丕賯乇兀 賰鬲丕亘 賮賱爻賮賷 兀毓噩亘賳賷 亘丨賯 馃槍.
卮賰乇丕 賱賱氐丿賷賯賴 丕賱鬲賷 乇卮丨鬲賱賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 # 卮賰乇丕 賱賰 毓夭賷夭鬲賷 乇丨賲賴鉂わ笍鉂わ笍鉂わ笍鉂わ笍
丕賯鬲亘丕爻 兀毓噩亘賳賷 :
賲毓馗賲 丕賱兀賲賴丕鬲 賯丕丿乇丕鬲 毓賱賶 廿毓胤丕亍 丕賱賱亘賳 賱賰賳 賯賱丞 賲賳賴賳 賯丕丿乇丕鬲 毓賱賶 廿毓胤丕亍 丕賱毓爻賱.
[丕賱賱亘賳 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱兀賵賱 賱賱丨亘] [丕賱毓爻賱 賷乇賲夭 廿賱賶 丨賱丕賵丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞 ]
# 鬲丨丿賷 _馗賱 _賰鬲丕亘
# 賮卅丞 賰鬲丕亘 兀賵 乇賵丕賷丞 鬲賵賮賷 氐丕丨亘賴丕 賯亘賱 爻賳丞 賲賷賱丕丿賰.
#賰鬲丕亘 乇賯賲 3/7
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 氐睾賷乇 丕賱丨噩賲 貙賰亘賷乇 丕賱賲毓賳賶貙囟禺賲 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲.
鬲賳丕賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 亘胤丕亘毓 賮賱爻賮賷貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷賳丕賯卮 賵賷丨賱賱 丕賱丨亘貙 毓賳丿 賯乇丕亍丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷鬲囟丨 賱賰 丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賱賷爻 賮賯胤 鬲毓賱賯 卮禺氐 亘卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賷毓賳賷 兀賳賴 丨亘 !賵賱賷爻 賰賱 賲丕 賷乇賶 賮賷 丕賱廿毓賱丕賲 賵丕賱丕賮賱丕賲 賴賵 丨亘 . 兀氐亘丨 爻賱毓丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 爻賱毓丞 賲爻鬲賴賱賰賴.
毓賳丿賲丕 賵賱丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賲賳賮氐賱丕 亘丕鬲氐丕賱賴 丕賱卮丿賷丿 亘 丕賱兀賲 賮賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓鬲賳賷 亘賴 鬲賴鬲賲 亘賴 賵鬲乇丕毓賷賴 賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱賵丨丿賴 丕賱鬲賰丕賮賱賷丞 賱賰賳 毓賳丿賲丕 賵毓賶 賵兀氐亘丨 兀賰亘乇 賲賳 賯亘賱 丕賳賮氐賱 毓賳 賰賱 賴匕丕 賱匕賱賰 兀氐亘丨 賷亘丨孬 賱胤乇賷賯丞 兀禺乇賶 賷賵噩丿 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘賴丕 .
匕賰乇 廿乇賷賰 毓亘丕乇丞 :兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵賱丿 丕賵賱 賲乇丞 亘匕賱賰 丕賱丕鬲丨丕丿 丕賱匕賷 丨丿孬 賮賷 丕賱乇丨賲 賵賷賵賱丿 賲乇丞 孬丕賳賷丞 亘丕鬲丨丕丿 丕賱丨亘.
賵囟丨 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 (丨亘 賳丕囟噩 ) 賵匕賱賰 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱賲丨丕賮馗丞 毓賱賶 鬲賮乇丿賴 賵賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 匕丕鬲賴 兀賳 賷毓賷卮 匕丕鬲賴 亘丕賱賲賯丕亘賱 兀賳 賱丕 賷氐亘丨 賴賵 丕賱胤乇賮 丕賱丌禺乇 賷亘賯賶 賲丨丕賮馗 毓賱賶 賰賷丕賳賴 賵毓賱賶 兀爻賱賵亘賴 兀賳 賱丕 賷睾賷乇賴 賵賷氐亘丨 賳爻禺賴 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱匕賷 賷乇賷丿賴.
賱賲 賷鬲賰賱賲 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 毓賳 丕賱毓丕卮賯 賵丕賱毓丕卮賯賴 亘賱 胤乇丨 賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱丨亘 亘卮賰賱 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賲丕賲丕 貙鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀亘賵賷 貙毓賳 丨亘 丕賱賱賴 貙毓賳 丨亘 丕賱兀賲 貙 毓賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賵兀賵囟丨 兀賳 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賳 賷丨亘 匕丕鬲賴 兀賳 賱賲 賷爻鬲胤毓 兀賳 賷丨亘 匕丕鬲賴 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賷丨亘 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳. 賱匕賱賰 兀賵囟丨 兀賳 丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲 賱賷爻 兀賳丕賳賷丞 丨爻亘 賲丕 賷賯賵賱賵賳賴 丕賱賳丕爻 賵賲丕 賴賵 賲鬲丿丕賵賱 亘賷賳賴賲 亘賱 毓賱賶 丕賱毓賰爻 丕賱丨亘 丕賱匕丕鬲賷 賴賵 兀爻丕爻 丨亘 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳.
毓賳丿 賯乇丕卅鬲賰 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲亘鬲毓丿 毓賳 賲賯賵賱丞 (賱丕 卮賷亍 兀爻賴賱 賲賳 丕賱丨亘)亘賱 鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳 賵丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲乇賷丿 兀賳 鬲丨氐賱 毓賱賷賴 毓賱賷賰 賲毓乇賮丞 兀爻丕爻 匕賱賰 丕賱賮賳 .
賲賴賲丕 鬲賰賱賲鬲 賱丕 丕爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 兀賵氐賱 丕賱賮賰乇賴 賵丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賴丕卅賱丞 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賵丕賱賰孬賷乇貙 兀禺匕鬲 賵賯鬲 胤賵賷賱 賮賷 賯乇丕亍鬲丞 乇睾賲 氐睾乇賴 賱賰賳 賱丕 兀乇賷丿 丕賯乇兀賴 毓賱賶 丕賱爻乇毓賴 賯乇兀鬲賴 亘鬲兀賳賷 賵賮賴賲鬲賴 氐賮丨丞 氐賮丨丞貙 鬲毓賱賲鬲 賲賳賴 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲賮乇丿丕鬲.
兀賵賱 鬲噩乇亘賴 賱賷 賲毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵兀賵賱 賲乇賴 丕賯乇兀 賰鬲丕亘 賮賱爻賮賷 兀毓噩亘賳賷 亘丨賯 馃槍.
卮賰乇丕 賱賱氐丿賷賯賴 丕賱鬲賷 乇卮丨鬲賱賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 # 卮賰乇丕 賱賰 毓夭賷夭鬲賷 乇丨賲賴鉂わ笍鉂わ笍鉂わ笍鉂わ笍
丕賯鬲亘丕爻 兀毓噩亘賳賷 :
賲毓馗賲 丕賱兀賲賴丕鬲 賯丕丿乇丕鬲 毓賱賶 廿毓胤丕亍 丕賱賱亘賳 賱賰賳 賯賱丞 賲賳賴賳 賯丕丿乇丕鬲 毓賱賶 廿毓胤丕亍 丕賱毓爻賱.
[丕賱賱亘賳 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱兀賵賱 賱賱丨亘] [丕賱毓爻賱 賷乇賲夭 廿賱賶 丨賱丕賵丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞 ]
# 鬲丨丿賷 _馗賱 _賰鬲丕亘
# 賮卅丞 賰鬲丕亘 兀賵 乇賵丕賷丞 鬲賵賮賷 氐丕丨亘賴丕 賯亘賱 爻賳丞 賲賷賱丕丿賰.
#賰鬲丕亘 乇賯賲 3/7
December 28, 2023
a veces homof贸bico y sexista, pero si ignoramos eso, gran tesis
March 10, 2018
賲賴賲 噩丿丕 兀賳 賳毓乇賮 丕賱兀爻丕爻 丕賱匕賷 亘賳賶 毓賱賷賴 "廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲" 賰鬲丕亘賴貙 賱賯丿 丕毓鬲亘乇 兀賳 丕賱丨亘 賴賵 丕賱丨賱 丕賱賵丨賷丿 賱賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷貙 賮丕賱丨亘 賮賷 乇兀賷賴 賴賵 丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷毓亘乇 亘賴丕 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賴賵丞 丕賱丕賳賮氐丕賱 毓賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賵賷鬲睾賱亘 亘賴丕 毓賱賶 丕睾鬲乇丕亘賴 賵賵丨丿鬲賴 亘丕鬲丨丕丿賴 賲毓 廿賳爻丕賳 丌禺乇.
賱賰賳 丕賱丨亘 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱"賮乇賵賲" 賱賷爻 賲噩乇丿 卮毓賵乇 賱兀賳賳丕 賱賵 丕毓鬲亘乇賳丕 匕賱賰 氐丨賷丨丕 賮賴匕丕 賷毓賳賷 兀賳賴 兀賲乇 睾賷乇 孬丕亘鬲 賵丿丕卅賲 丕賱鬲睾賷乇 賵 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賱鬲毓賵賷賱 毓賱賷賴貙 亘賱 丕賱丨亘 賮賷 賳馗乇賴 賮賳 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷鬲毓賱賲賴 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 噩賷丿丕 賵賷兀禺匕賴 毓賱賶 賲丨賲賱 丕賱噩丿 賵賷賲丕乇爻賴 亘鬲乇賰賷夭 賵氐亘乇 賵廿賷賲丕賳 賲胤賱賯 亘兀賴賲賷鬲賴 丕賱賯氐賵賶 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 .
丕賱丨亘 賴丕賴賳丕 賴賵 賲賳丕夭毓 賱賱賳乇噩爻賷丞 賵賲囟丕丿 賱賱兀賳丕賳賷丞貙 賮賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲乇賶 丕賱賳丕爻 賵丕賱毓丕賱賲 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 乇睾亘丕鬲賰 兀賳鬲 賵賲氐丕賱丨賰 賵賲賳賮毓鬲賰 丿賵賳 丕毓鬲亘丕乇 賱賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賱 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓賷 賱賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱賳丕爻 貙 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳賰 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 賰賱 賲丕 鬲乇睾亘 賮賷賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賴賵 兀賳 鬲購丨賻亘 賱丕 兀賳 鬲購丨賽亘貙 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 丕賯鬲氐乇 丨亘賰 毓賱賶 毓丕卅賱鬲賰 丿賵賳 丕賱睾乇賷亘.
兀賵丿 毓乇囟 賮氐賵賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 毓乇囟丕 爻乇賷毓丕:
賮賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀賵賱 丕賯鬲氐乇 "賮乇賵賲" 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲爻丕丐賱 廿匕丕 賲丕賰丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳丕 丨賯丕 賵賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱廿噩丕亘丞 毓賳 匕賱賰.
賵賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賷毓丿丿 "賮乇賵賲" 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘 賮賷鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 賵丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀亘賵賷 賵丨亘 丕賱賱賴 賵丕賱丨亘 亘賷賳 丕賱乇噩賱 賵丕賱賲乇兀丞 賵賯丿 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賰孬賷乇丕 丕賴鬲賲丕賲賴 亘廿亘乇丕夭 鬲毓丿丿 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘.
兀賲丕 賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 賷鬲丨丿孬 "賮乇賵賲" 毓賳 鬲賮賰賰 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱睾乇亘賷 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇 賵毓賳 鬲卮賵賴 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨亘 賮賷賴 鬲兀孬乇丕 亘乇兀爻賲丕賱賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賵丨卮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱賲 鬲爻賷胤乇 賮賯胤 毓賱賶 丕賯鬲氐丕丿賴 亘賱 毓賱賶 賰賱 賲賮丕賴賷賲賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 賮丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱丕爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷丞 賵賮賰乇丞 賲賯丕賷囟丞 丕賱爻賱毓 鬲睾賱睾賱鬲 丨鬲賶 廿賱賶 兀毓賲賯 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞貙 賮賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬 "兀賳丕 兀丨亘賰 賱兀賳賰 鬲賳賮毓賳賷 賵兀毓胤賷賰 賱兀賳賰 鬲毓胤賷賳賷 " 賵賱丕 賲噩丕賱 賴丕賴賳丕 賱賮賴賲 丕賱丨亘 賰毓胤丕亍 賵亘賳丕亍 賷丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 賵賳卮丕胤 賷孬賷乇 丕賱賴賲賲 賵賷丿賮毓 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿賱賶 丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘丕賱賲丨亘賵亘 賵丕賱毓賲賱 賱兀噩賱賴貙 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賰匕賱賰 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賲賱丕丨馗丞 "賮乇賵賲" 丕賱孬丕賯亘丞 賱鬲爻賱賱 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱丕爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷丞 廿賱賶 丕賱丿賷賳 賳賮爻賴 賵鬲賮卮賷 丕賱賳馗乇丞 丕賱賲丕丿賷丞 丕賱毓賱賲丕賳賷丞 丨鬲賶 丿丕禺賱 廿胤丕乇 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 賵丿賵賳 賵毓賷 兀丨賷丕賳丕 .
賵兀禺賷乇丕 賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賷鬲丨丿孬 "賮乇賵賲" 賯賱賷賱丕 毓賳 賲賲丕乇爻丞 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 賵賴賵 賷乇賶 兀賳賴 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賵賲賴賲丕 鬲丨丿孬賳丕 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 賮爻賷亘賯賶 鬲噩乇亘丞 卮禺氐賷丞 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱禺氐賵氐賷丞 廿賱丕 兀賳賴 乇賰夭 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 毓賱賶 賰賵賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳丕 賰兀賷 賮賳 丌禺乇 賷鬲胤賱亘 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵丕賱氐亘乇 賵丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘賴 賵卮乇丨 賰賱 卮乇胤 賲賳 賴丐賱丕亍 亘廿賷噩丕夭 貙 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 乇亘胤 "賮乇賵賲" 亘賷賳 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳貙 賮丕賱丨亘 賮賷 賳馗乇賴 賷鬲胤賱亘 廿賷賲丕賳丕 亘丕賱賲丨亘賵亘 賵廿賲賰丕賳賷丕鬲賴 賵亘賯丿乇丞 丕賱丨亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賲賵 賵丕賱廿亘丿丕毓 賵賴匕丕 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 毓賯賱丕賳賷 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 賵賷丨鬲丕噩 賰孬賷乇丕 賲賳 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 賵丕賱賲禺丕胤乇丞 賵丕賱鬲賲爻賰 亘賯賷賲 賲毓賷賳丞 賵毓丿賲 鬲噩丕賵夭賴丕 賲賴賲丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱馗乇賵賮 .
賵亘毓丿貙
賮賴匕丕 賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓 賲鬲賲賷夭 賵賲禺鬲賱賮 賮賷 賲賵囟賵毓賴 賵賲賱賷亍 亘丕賱賲賱丕丨馗丕鬲 丕賱匕賰賷丞 賵丕賱賱賲丨丕鬲 丕賱賱胤賷賮丞 賵丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱亘丿賷毓丞貙 賱丕 賷毓賷亘賴 爻賵賶 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 爻賷卅丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賵丕賱兀禺胤丕亍 丕賱賲胤亘毓賷丞 丕賱賲爻鬲賮夭丞 :D
賵毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱 賱賯丿 丕賰鬲爻亘賳丕 氐丿賷賯丕 噩丿賷丿丕 賯乇兀賳丕 賱賴 孬賱丕孬丞 賰鬲亘 丨鬲賶 丕賱丌賳 賵乇睾賲 兀賳賳丕 賱丕 賳鬲賮賯 賲毓賴 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 賮廿賳賴 賱賲 賷禺賷亘 賮賷 兀賷 賲賳賴丕 兀賲賱賳丕貙 廿賳賴 "廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲".
賱賰賳 丕賱丨亘 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱"賮乇賵賲" 賱賷爻 賲噩乇丿 卮毓賵乇 賱兀賳賳丕 賱賵 丕毓鬲亘乇賳丕 匕賱賰 氐丨賷丨丕 賮賴匕丕 賷毓賳賷 兀賳賴 兀賲乇 睾賷乇 孬丕亘鬲 賵丿丕卅賲 丕賱鬲睾賷乇 賵 賱丕 賷賲賰賳 丕賱鬲毓賵賷賱 毓賱賷賴貙 亘賱 丕賱丨亘 賮賷 賳馗乇賴 賮賳 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷鬲毓賱賲賴 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 噩賷丿丕 賵賷兀禺匕賴 毓賱賶 賲丨賲賱 丕賱噩丿 賵賷賲丕乇爻賴 亘鬲乇賰賷夭 賵氐亘乇 賵廿賷賲丕賳 賲胤賱賯 亘兀賴賲賷鬲賴 丕賱賯氐賵賶 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 .
丕賱丨亘 賴丕賴賳丕 賴賵 賲賳丕夭毓 賱賱賳乇噩爻賷丞 賵賲囟丕丿 賱賱兀賳丕賳賷丞貙 賮賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 賰賳鬲 鬲乇賶 丕賱賳丕爻 賵丕賱毓丕賱賲 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 乇睾亘丕鬲賰 兀賳鬲 賵賲氐丕賱丨賰 賵賲賳賮毓鬲賰 丿賵賳 丕毓鬲亘丕乇 賱賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賱 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓賷 賱賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱賳丕爻 貙 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳賰 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 賰賱 賲丕 鬲乇睾亘 賮賷賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賴賵 兀賳 鬲購丨賻亘 賱丕 兀賳 鬲購丨賽亘貙 賵賱丕 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 鬲丨亘 丨賯丕 廿匕丕 丕賯鬲氐乇 丨亘賰 毓賱賶 毓丕卅賱鬲賰 丿賵賳 丕賱睾乇賷亘.
兀賵丿 毓乇囟 賮氐賵賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 毓乇囟丕 爻乇賷毓丕:
賮賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀賵賱 丕賯鬲氐乇 "賮乇賵賲" 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲爻丕丐賱 廿匕丕 賲丕賰丕賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳丕 丨賯丕 賵賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱廿噩丕亘丞 毓賳 匕賱賰.
賵賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賷毓丿丿 "賮乇賵賲" 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘 賮賷鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀禺賵賷 賵丕賱丨亘 丕賱兀亘賵賷 賵丨亘 丕賱賱賴 賵丕賱丨亘 亘賷賳 丕賱乇噩賱 賵丕賱賲乇兀丞 賵賯丿 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賰孬賷乇丕 丕賴鬲賲丕賲賴 亘廿亘乇丕夭 鬲毓丿丿 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕賱丨亘.
兀賲丕 賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱孬丕賱孬 賷鬲丨丿孬 "賮乇賵賲" 毓賳 鬲賮賰賰 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱睾乇亘賷 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇 賵毓賳 鬲卮賵賴 賲賮賴賵賲 丕賱丨亘 賮賷賴 鬲兀孬乇丕 亘乇兀爻賲丕賱賷鬲賴 丕賱賲鬲賵丨卮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱賲 鬲爻賷胤乇 賮賯胤 毓賱賶 丕賯鬲氐丕丿賴 亘賱 毓賱賶 賰賱 賲賮丕賴賷賲賴 賮賷 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 賮丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱丕爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷丞 賵賮賰乇丞 賲賯丕賷囟丞 丕賱爻賱毓 鬲睾賱睾賱鬲 丨鬲賶 廿賱賶 兀毓賲賯 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞貙 賮賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬 "兀賳丕 兀丨亘賰 賱兀賳賰 鬲賳賮毓賳賷 賵兀毓胤賷賰 賱兀賳賰 鬲毓胤賷賳賷 " 賵賱丕 賲噩丕賱 賴丕賴賳丕 賱賮賴賲 丕賱丨亘 賰毓胤丕亍 賵亘賳丕亍 賷丨鬲丕噩 廿賱賶 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 賵賳卮丕胤 賷孬賷乇 丕賱賴賲賲 賵賷丿賮毓 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿賱賶 丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘丕賱賲丨亘賵亘 賵丕賱毓賲賱 賱兀噩賱賴貙 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賰匕賱賰 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 賲賱丕丨馗丞 "賮乇賵賲" 丕賱孬丕賯亘丞 賱鬲爻賱賱 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱丕爻鬲賴賱丕賰賷丞 廿賱賶 丕賱丿賷賳 賳賮爻賴 賵鬲賮卮賷 丕賱賳馗乇丞 丕賱賲丕丿賷丞 丕賱毓賱賲丕賳賷丞 丨鬲賶 丿丕禺賱 廿胤丕乇 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 賵丿賵賳 賵毓賷 兀丨賷丕賳丕 .
賵兀禺賷乇丕 賮賷 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱乇丕亘毓 賷鬲丨丿孬 "賮乇賵賲" 賯賱賷賱丕 毓賳 賲賲丕乇爻丞 賮賳 丕賱丨亘 賵賴賵 賷乇賶 兀賳賴 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賵賲賴賲丕 鬲丨丿孬賳丕 毓賳 丕賱丨亘 賮爻賷亘賯賶 鬲噩乇亘丞 卮禺氐賷丞 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱禺氐賵氐賷丞 廿賱丕 兀賳賴 乇賰夭 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 毓賱賶 賰賵賳 丕賱丨亘 賮賳丕 賰兀賷 賮賳 丌禺乇 賷鬲胤賱亘 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱鬲乇賰賷夭 賵丕賱氐亘乇 賵丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘賴 賵卮乇丨 賰賱 卮乇胤 賲賳 賴丐賱丕亍 亘廿賷噩丕夭 貙 兀毓噩亘賳賷 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱 乇亘胤 "賮乇賵賲" 亘賷賳 丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱廿賷賲丕賳貙 賮丕賱丨亘 賮賷 賳馗乇賴 賷鬲胤賱亘 廿賷賲丕賳丕 亘丕賱賲丨亘賵亘 賵廿賲賰丕賳賷丕鬲賴 賵亘賯丿乇丞 丕賱丨亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賲賵 賵丕賱廿亘丿丕毓 賵賴匕丕 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 毓賯賱丕賳賷 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 賵賷丨鬲丕噩 賰孬賷乇丕 賲賳 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 賵丕賱賲禺丕胤乇丞 賵丕賱鬲賲爻賰 亘賯賷賲 賲毓賷賳丞 賵毓丿賲 鬲噩丕賵夭賴丕 賲賴賲丕 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱馗乇賵賮 .
賵亘毓丿貙
賮賴匕丕 賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓 賲鬲賲賷夭 賵賲禺鬲賱賮 賮賷 賲賵囟賵毓賴 賵賲賱賷亍 亘丕賱賲賱丕丨馗丕鬲 丕賱匕賰賷丞 賵丕賱賱賲丨丕鬲 丕賱賱胤賷賮丞 賵丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱亘丿賷毓丞貙 賱丕 賷毓賷亘賴 爻賵賶 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 爻賷卅丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賵丕賱兀禺胤丕亍 丕賱賲胤亘毓賷丞 丕賱賲爻鬲賮夭丞 :D
賵毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱 賱賯丿 丕賰鬲爻亘賳丕 氐丿賷賯丕 噩丿賷丿丕 賯乇兀賳丕 賱賴 孬賱丕孬丞 賰鬲亘 丨鬲賶 丕賱丌賳 賵乇睾賲 兀賳賳丕 賱丕 賳鬲賮賯 賲毓賴 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 賮廿賳賴 賱賲 賷禺賷亘 賮賷 兀賷 賲賳賴丕 兀賲賱賳丕貙 廿賳賴 "廿乇賷賰 賮乇賵賲".
August 18, 2017
"螣蟺慰喂慰蟼 蔚蟺喂渭蔚谓蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟽蠁伪位蔚喂伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏 蟽喂纬慰蠀蟻喂伪 蠅蟼 蟺蟻蠅蟿伪蟻蠂喂魏蔚蟼 蟽蠀谓胃畏魏蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 味蠅畏蟼, 未蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚喂 谓伪 蔚蠂蔚喂 蟺喂蟽蟿畏.慰蟺慰喂慰蟼 魏位蔚喂谓蔚蟿伪喂 渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 蔚谓伪 未喂魏慰 蟿慰蠀 蟽蠀蟽蟿畏渭伪 伪渭蠀谓伪蟼, 蟽蟿慰 蟺位伪喂蟽喂慰 蟿慰蠀 慰蟺慰喂慰蠀 畏 伪蟽蠁伪位蔚喂伪 蔚魏蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺蔚喂蟿伪喂 伪蟺慰 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰蟽蟿伪蟽喂慰蟺慰喂畏蟽畏 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 魏伪蟿慰蠂畏, 魏伪胃喂蟽蟿伪 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿慰 蟿慰蠀 蠁蠀位伪魏喂蟽渭蔚谓慰.蟿慰 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺喂蔚蟽伪喂 魏伪喂 谓伪 伪纬伪蟺伪蟼 伪蟺伪喂蟿蔚喂 胃伪蟻蟻慰蟼"
螒蠀蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀渭尾伪喂谓蔚喂 渭蔚 蟿伪 尾喂尾位喂伪 伪蠀蟿慰尾蔚位蟿喂蠅蟽畏蟼 未蔚谓 蔚喂谓伪喂 慰蟿喂 蟽慰蠀 伪谓慰喂纬慰蠀谓 蟿伪 渭伪蟿喂伪 萎 蟽慰蠀 位蔚谓蔚 蟿蟻慰渭蔚蟻伪 渭蠀蟽蟿喂魏伪 萎 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺慰蟿蔚 未蔚谓 蔚喂蠂蔚蟼 蟽魏蔚蠁蟿蔚喂.伪蠀蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 渭慰蠀 伪蟻蔚蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿伪 蔚谓 位慰纬蠅 尾喂尾位喂伪 蔚喂谓伪喂 蟿慰 蟺慰蟽慰 蟽蠀蠂谓伪 魏慰蠀谓蠅 蟿慰 魏蔚蠁伪位喂 渭慰蠀 渭蔚 魏伪蟿伪谓慰畏蟽畏 伪谓伪纬谓蠅蟻喂味慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿慰 渭慰蠀 蟽蔚 蠁蟻伪蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 萎 渭蔚 伪蟺慰未慰魏喂渭伪蟽喂伪 (蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿慰 渭慰蠀)蟽蔚 蟽畏渭蔚喂伪 蟺慰蠀 尉蔚蟻蠅 蟺慰位蠀 魏伪位伪 慰蟿喂 蔚喂谓伪喂 渭蔚纬伪位蔚蟼 伪位畏胃蔚喂蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 慰蟺慰喂蔚蟼 慰渭蠅蟼 蔚蠂蠅 尉蔚蠂伪蟽蔚喂..蔚喂谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蟺慰位蠀 魏伪位畏 蔚渭蟺蔚喂蟻喂伪 伪蠁蠀蟺谓喂蟽畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠀 渭慰蠀 魏伪喂 尾喂尾位喂伪 慰蟺蠅蟼 伪蠀蟿慰 渭蔚 魏伪谓慰蠀谓 谓伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰位伪渭尾伪谓蠅.
螒蠀蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀渭尾伪喂谓蔚喂 渭蔚 蟿伪 尾喂尾位喂伪 伪蠀蟿慰尾蔚位蟿喂蠅蟽畏蟼 未蔚谓 蔚喂谓伪喂 慰蟿喂 蟽慰蠀 伪谓慰喂纬慰蠀谓 蟿伪 渭伪蟿喂伪 萎 蟽慰蠀 位蔚谓蔚 蟿蟻慰渭蔚蟻伪 渭蠀蟽蟿喂魏伪 萎 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺慰蟿蔚 未蔚谓 蔚喂蠂蔚蟼 蟽魏蔚蠁蟿蔚喂.伪蠀蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 渭慰蠀 伪蟻蔚蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿伪 蔚谓 位慰纬蠅 尾喂尾位喂伪 蔚喂谓伪喂 蟿慰 蟺慰蟽慰 蟽蠀蠂谓伪 魏慰蠀谓蠅 蟿慰 魏蔚蠁伪位喂 渭慰蠀 渭蔚 魏伪蟿伪谓慰畏蟽畏 伪谓伪纬谓蠅蟻喂味慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿慰 渭慰蠀 蟽蔚 蠁蟻伪蟽蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 萎 渭蔚 伪蟺慰未慰魏喂渭伪蟽喂伪 (蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿慰 渭慰蠀)蟽蔚 蟽畏渭蔚喂伪 蟺慰蠀 尉蔚蟻蠅 蟺慰位蠀 魏伪位伪 慰蟿喂 蔚喂谓伪喂 渭蔚纬伪位蔚蟼 伪位畏胃蔚喂蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 慰蟺慰喂蔚蟼 慰渭蠅蟼 蔚蠂蠅 尉蔚蠂伪蟽蔚喂..蔚喂谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蟺慰位蠀 魏伪位畏 蔚渭蟺蔚喂蟻喂伪 伪蠁蠀蟺谓喂蟽畏蟼 蟿慰蠀 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠀 渭慰蠀 魏伪喂 尾喂尾位喂伪 慰蟺蠅蟼 伪蠀蟿慰 渭蔚 魏伪谓慰蠀谓 谓伪 蟿畏谓 伪蟺慰位伪渭尾伪谓蠅.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 5,421 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.