What do you think?
Rate this book
Les Enfants du d茅sastre #1
丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲
芦噩賳诏 亘乇丕蹖 鬲噩丕乇鬲 亘爻蹖丕乇 爻賵丿丌賵乇 丕爻鬲貙 丨鬲丕 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 丌賳禄
亘丕 亘賴 倬丕蹖丕賳 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘夭乇诏鈥屫臂屬� 讴卮鬲丕乇 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲賲 丿乇 噩賳诏 噩賴丕賳蹖 丕賵賱 丿乇 爻丕賱鈥屬囏й� 郾酃郾鄞 - 郾酃郾鄹 賵 亘丕賯蹖 賲丕賳丿賳 賵蹖乇丕賳賴鈥屬囏й屰� 毓馗蹖賲貙 丿賵 賳噩丕鬲 蹖丕賮鬲賴贁 丕蹖賳 賮丕噩毓賴貙 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 禺胤 賲賯丿賲 噩亘賴賴貙 讴賴 趩賳丿丕賳 賴賲 爻賱丕賲鬲 噩爻賲蹖 賵 乇賵丨蹖 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 賵丕丿丕乇 賲蹖卮賵賳丿 讴賱丕賴亘乇丿丕乇蹖 丨蹖乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賵 囟丿 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 胤乇丨 乇蹖夭蹖 讴賳賳丿 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 鬲丕 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 倬蹖 賲蹖诏蹖乇賳丿. 诏賵蹖丕 丕夭 賲蹖丿丕賳 丕賮鬲禺丕乇丌賲蹖夭 賳亘賵丿 亘丕 丿卮賲賳貙 亘乇丕蹖 賳噩丕鬲 賲蹖賴賳貙 鬲丕 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏й� 讴爻亘 爻賵丿 乇丕賴 丿乇丕夭蹖 丿乇 倬蹖卮 賳蹖爻鬲鈥�
丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲 亘賳丕蹖 毓馗蹖賲蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇 丕賮乇丕卮鬲賴 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 亘蹖鈥屫必呟屸€屬囏� 賵 鬲賯賱亘 賴蹖 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳貙 亘丕 爻丕禺鬲丕乇蹖 趩賳丕賳 丿乇禺卮丕賳 賵賯丿乇鬲 亘蹖丕賳蹖 趩賳丕賳 倬乇 氐賱丕亘鬲 讴賴貙 亘賴 亘丕賵乇 丕賴丿丕 讴賳賳丿诏丕賳 噩丕蹖夭賴 丕丿亘蹖 诏賳讴賵乇 亘賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 趩賳蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴蹖 亘毓丿 丕夭 噩賳诏鈥屬囏й� 郾酃郾鄞 - 郾酃郾鄹 鬲丕讴賳賵賳 禺賱賯 賳卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
亘丕 亘賴 倬丕蹖丕賳 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘夭乇诏鈥屫臂屬� 讴卮鬲丕乇 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲賲 丿乇 噩賳诏 噩賴丕賳蹖 丕賵賱 丿乇 爻丕賱鈥屬囏й� 郾酃郾鄞 - 郾酃郾鄹 賵 亘丕賯蹖 賲丕賳丿賳 賵蹖乇丕賳賴鈥屬囏й屰� 毓馗蹖賲貙 丿賵 賳噩丕鬲 蹖丕賮鬲賴贁 丕蹖賳 賮丕噩毓賴貙 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 禺胤 賲賯丿賲 噩亘賴賴貙 讴賴 趩賳丿丕賳 賴賲 爻賱丕賲鬲 噩爻賲蹖 賵 乇賵丨蹖 賳丿丕乇賳丿貙 賵丕丿丕乇 賲蹖卮賵賳丿 讴賱丕賴亘乇丿丕乇蹖 丨蹖乇鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賵 囟丿 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 胤乇丨 乇蹖夭蹖 讴賳賳丿 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 鬲丕 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 倬蹖 賲蹖诏蹖乇賳丿. 诏賵蹖丕 丕夭 賲蹖丿丕賳 丕賮鬲禺丕乇丌賲蹖夭 賳亘賵丿 亘丕 丿卮賲賳貙 亘乇丕蹖 賳噩丕鬲 賲蹖賴賳貙 鬲丕 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏й� 讴爻亘 爻賵丿 乇丕賴 丿乇丕夭蹖 丿乇 倬蹖卮 賳蹖爻鬲鈥�
丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲 亘賳丕蹖 毓馗蹖賲蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇 丕賮乇丕卮鬲賴 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 亘蹖鈥屫必呟屸€屬囏� 賵 鬲賯賱亘 賴蹖 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳貙 亘丕 爻丕禺鬲丕乇蹖 趩賳丕賳 丿乇禺卮丕賳 賵賯丿乇鬲 亘蹖丕賳蹖 趩賳丕賳 倬乇 氐賱丕亘鬲 讴賴貙 亘賴 亘丕賵乇 丕賴丿丕 讴賳賳丿诏丕賳 噩丕蹖夭賴 丕丿亘蹖 诏賳讴賵乇 亘賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 趩賳蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 亘丕卮讴賵賴蹖 亘毓丿 丕夭 噩賳诏鈥屬囏й� 郾酃郾鄞 - 郾酃郾鄹 鬲丕讴賳賵賳 禺賱賯 賳卮丿賴 丕爻鬲.
494 pages, Paperback
First published August 21, 2013
886 people are currently reading
12474 people want to read
About the author
Pierre Lemaitre
106听books2,000听followersPierre Lemaitre is a French novelist and screenwriter. He is internationally renowned for the crime novels featuring the fictional character Commandant Camille Verh艙ven.
His first novel that was translated into English, Alex, is a translation of the French book with the same title, it jointly won the CWA International Dagger for best translated crime novel of 2013.
In November 2013, he was awarded the Prix Goncourt, France's top literary prize, for Au revoir l脿-haut (published in English as The Great Swindle), an epic about World War I. His novels Camille and The Great Swindle won the CWA International Dagger in 2015 and 2016 respectively.
His first novel that was translated into English, Alex, is a translation of the French book with the same title, it jointly won the CWA International Dagger for best translated crime novel of 2013.
In November 2013, he was awarded the Prix Goncourt, France's top literary prize, for Au revoir l脿-haut (published in English as The Great Swindle), an epic about World War I. His novels Camille and The Great Swindle won the CWA International Dagger in 2015 and 2016 respectively.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,546 reviews
August 18, 2018
This novel won France鈥檚 highest literary award, the Prix Goncourt, in 2013.
To summarize from the blurbs: two French WW I veterans find themselves in a society whose 鈥渞everence for its dead cannot quite match its resentment for those who survived.鈥� They are penniless. One lost the lower half of his face and is morphine addicted. Physically and psychologically destroyed by the war, both are cut off from their families (one man is gay, abandoned and disowned by his father) and the men seeks revenge against the country they feel has abandoned them.
They still fear a lieutenant from the war who, trying to make a name for himself in the last ten days before the peace, kills two of his own men and tried to kill the two men who are the main characters in the book.
There鈥檚 a lot more to the plot (it鈥檚 almost 500 pages) but much of the book is about two swindles; one real and one fictitious.
The real swindle, researched by the author, was a scandal in France after the war. Imagine the impact of loved ones finding out how the bodies of their lost sons, brothers and fathers were treated. We are used to seeing pictures of row upon row of soldiers鈥� graves in neatly arranged cemeteries. And we are used to seeing war dead returned with honor guards. But that鈥檚 not how it was in the heat of battle in the trench warfare of WW I. Bodies were tossed into pits, gullies and bomb craters and hastily buried.
What occurred after the war wasn鈥檛 pretty either. An illicit practice started where wealthy people paid soldiers to reveal where their loved ones were buried and then paid others to retrieve their bodies for burial. After the war a massive operation was undertaken by France to find and exhume bodies for proper burial in the national war cemeteries.
Companies bid on contracts that went to the low bidders. Chinese and African immigrants did most of this nasty work. Most were illiterate, certainly in French. They could not read 鈥渄og tags鈥� or other identifying paperwork, so bodies were mixed up. Paid 鈥渂y the coffin,鈥� German war dead were sometimes interred as French soldiers. Empty coffins were assigned names and buried. The companies scrimped on the size of coffins, sometimes cutting off heads or feet to fit bodies into the smallest coffin possible. Personal items and clothing were stolen. One company even paid grave workers for dentures stolen from the dead.
After the war, every town tried to outdo its neighbors in building monuments to honor their war dead. The two destitute men, left to shift for themselves, resent this extravagance on the dead while living veterans are largely ignored. Here鈥檚 the fake scandal: Since the injured man is an excellent artist, he concocts a scheme with the help of his buddy to sell war memorials and receive down payments for projects that will never be built.
There is good writing. Some samples:
鈥淗e hiked up the front of his pants as if to say: I could do with a drink now.鈥�
鈥溾€o many trips, so many meetings, scarcely time to screw his wife鈥檚 friends; this government order was taking up all his time and energy.鈥�
鈥淗aving no one and nothing in his life 鈥� not even a cat 鈥� everything was about him, his existence had curled in on itself like a dry leaf around an empty space.鈥�
[Of the town mayor who simply rambled when he spoke]: 鈥淲hat did it mean, this prolixity? It was impossible to tell. Labourdin constructed sentences from sounds rather than ideas.鈥�
鈥淚t sounded as though he had spent much time thinking about the question but never about the answer.鈥�
A great read 鈥� I鈥檒l give it a 4.5 and round up to 鈥�5.鈥�
Top photo from thoughtco.com
Photo of Etaples Military Cemetery from tripadvisor.com.uk
Photo of the author from elperiodico.com
To summarize from the blurbs: two French WW I veterans find themselves in a society whose 鈥渞everence for its dead cannot quite match its resentment for those who survived.鈥� They are penniless. One lost the lower half of his face and is morphine addicted. Physically and psychologically destroyed by the war, both are cut off from their families (one man is gay, abandoned and disowned by his father) and the men seeks revenge against the country they feel has abandoned them.
They still fear a lieutenant from the war who, trying to make a name for himself in the last ten days before the peace, kills two of his own men and tried to kill the two men who are the main characters in the book.
There鈥檚 a lot more to the plot (it鈥檚 almost 500 pages) but much of the book is about two swindles; one real and one fictitious.
The real swindle, researched by the author, was a scandal in France after the war. Imagine the impact of loved ones finding out how the bodies of their lost sons, brothers and fathers were treated. We are used to seeing pictures of row upon row of soldiers鈥� graves in neatly arranged cemeteries. And we are used to seeing war dead returned with honor guards. But that鈥檚 not how it was in the heat of battle in the trench warfare of WW I. Bodies were tossed into pits, gullies and bomb craters and hastily buried.
What occurred after the war wasn鈥檛 pretty either. An illicit practice started where wealthy people paid soldiers to reveal where their loved ones were buried and then paid others to retrieve their bodies for burial. After the war a massive operation was undertaken by France to find and exhume bodies for proper burial in the national war cemeteries.
Companies bid on contracts that went to the low bidders. Chinese and African immigrants did most of this nasty work. Most were illiterate, certainly in French. They could not read 鈥渄og tags鈥� or other identifying paperwork, so bodies were mixed up. Paid 鈥渂y the coffin,鈥� German war dead were sometimes interred as French soldiers. Empty coffins were assigned names and buried. The companies scrimped on the size of coffins, sometimes cutting off heads or feet to fit bodies into the smallest coffin possible. Personal items and clothing were stolen. One company even paid grave workers for dentures stolen from the dead.
After the war, every town tried to outdo its neighbors in building monuments to honor their war dead. The two destitute men, left to shift for themselves, resent this extravagance on the dead while living veterans are largely ignored. Here鈥檚 the fake scandal: Since the injured man is an excellent artist, he concocts a scheme with the help of his buddy to sell war memorials and receive down payments for projects that will never be built.
There is good writing. Some samples:
鈥淗e hiked up the front of his pants as if to say: I could do with a drink now.鈥�
鈥溾€o many trips, so many meetings, scarcely time to screw his wife鈥檚 friends; this government order was taking up all his time and energy.鈥�
鈥淗aving no one and nothing in his life 鈥� not even a cat 鈥� everything was about him, his existence had curled in on itself like a dry leaf around an empty space.鈥�
[Of the town mayor who simply rambled when he spoke]: 鈥淲hat did it mean, this prolixity? It was impossible to tell. Labourdin constructed sentences from sounds rather than ideas.鈥�
鈥淚t sounded as though he had spent much time thinking about the question but never about the answer.鈥�
A great read 鈥� I鈥檒l give it a 4.5 and round up to 鈥�5.鈥�
Top photo from thoughtco.com
Photo of Etaples Military Cemetery from tripadvisor.com.uk
Photo of the author from elperiodico.com
November 27, 2015
A very strange book to have won the Goncourt Prize 鈥� it's more superficially engaging than you might expect from French literary fiction (the author is better known as a writer of thrillers), but also much more shallow. In fact it doesn't really seem to be about anything, except for a string of vaguely related incidents involving two survivors of the First World War 鈥� and at more than six hundred pages, that's really not enough. This book is just far too long. In fact by the time you finally reach the end, you've already long since metaphorically put the chairs on the tables and started switching lights off.
We do get off to quite an exciting start: a battlefield in the closing days of the war, November 1918, and two French privates whose lives come together in a moment of near-death melodrama. The soldiers' subsequent attempts to make a go of it in post-war Paris are inwoven with the country's capitalist rush to finance war memorials: while the concept of the French solider is f锚ted and glorified, actual surviving soldiers, many of whom are grotesquely injured, are ostracised and shunned.
Thematically this should be pretty interesting, but unfortunately it's mostly used as the pretext for a lot of dramatic set-pieces whose narrative tension is sometimes engineered rather cheaply. I think it's cheating, for instance, to say that a character has died, only to reveal later that he's still alive after all, and similar tricks are played at several points herein. The main characters become involved in perpetrating a huge countrywide scam, and this is squeezed for every drop of manufactured tension it can provide. Which personally, I hated 鈥� you know those scenes in films or TV shows where someone's snuck into someone's office, and they have to get a file out of a drawer, or download something on to a USB stick or something?鈥攁nd at the same time you can see the owner pulling up outside and walking up the stairs, turning the handle 鈥� argh! I can't stand these scenes, I actually sometimes have to switch over because they stress me out so much. Well this book is kind of like that, only strung out for five hundred pages.
(That title, by the way. It means 鈥楽ee you in heaven鈥� or something along those lines, but for Anglophone readers 鈥� well, for me anyway听鈥撎齣t can't help bringing to mind echoes of Robert Graves's famous First World War memoir, Goodbye to All That. The English translation of this one appears to be called The Great Swindle, which is鈥ine, if kind of giving up.)
The writing style is not bad 鈥� it's very easy to read, few long words, a feeling of wit and intelligence there, but certainly nothing that makes you want to underline phrases in delight; and while the two main characters are well done, the same can't be said for some of the supporting cast: the perky-parlourmaid love interest and the evil-aristo baddie seem to have been ordered straight from central casting. Because of its length and its episodic nature, some people have compared this to the big nineteenth-century novels, but that's a strange connection to want to make with a story like this, which takes its narrative inspiration much more from Barbusse, Genevoix and Chevallier (as the afterword explicitly says). Problem is I'm not sure Pierre Lemaitre really comes out of this comparison well, which is a polite way of saying that he definitely doesn't 鈥� many parts of his book are good fun, but you'd do a lot better to read Barbusse, Genevoix and Chevallier instead.
We do get off to quite an exciting start: a battlefield in the closing days of the war, November 1918, and two French privates whose lives come together in a moment of near-death melodrama. The soldiers' subsequent attempts to make a go of it in post-war Paris are inwoven with the country's capitalist rush to finance war memorials: while the concept of the French solider is f锚ted and glorified, actual surviving soldiers, many of whom are grotesquely injured, are ostracised and shunned.
La guerre avait 茅t茅 une terrible 茅preuve de solitude, mais ce n'茅tait rien compar茅 脿 cette p茅riode de d茅mobilisation qui prenait des allures de descente aux enfers鈥�.
Thematically this should be pretty interesting, but unfortunately it's mostly used as the pretext for a lot of dramatic set-pieces whose narrative tension is sometimes engineered rather cheaply. I think it's cheating, for instance, to say that a character has died, only to reveal later that he's still alive after all, and similar tricks are played at several points herein. The main characters become involved in perpetrating a huge countrywide scam, and this is squeezed for every drop of manufactured tension it can provide. Which personally, I hated 鈥� you know those scenes in films or TV shows where someone's snuck into someone's office, and they have to get a file out of a drawer, or download something on to a USB stick or something?鈥攁nd at the same time you can see the owner pulling up outside and walking up the stairs, turning the handle 鈥� argh! I can't stand these scenes, I actually sometimes have to switch over because they stress me out so much. Well this book is kind of like that, only strung out for five hundred pages.
(That title, by the way. It means 鈥楽ee you in heaven鈥� or something along those lines, but for Anglophone readers 鈥� well, for me anyway听鈥撎齣t can't help bringing to mind echoes of Robert Graves's famous First World War memoir, Goodbye to All That. The English translation of this one appears to be called The Great Swindle, which is鈥ine, if kind of giving up.)
The writing style is not bad 鈥� it's very easy to read, few long words, a feeling of wit and intelligence there, but certainly nothing that makes you want to underline phrases in delight; and while the two main characters are well done, the same can't be said for some of the supporting cast: the perky-parlourmaid love interest and the evil-aristo baddie seem to have been ordered straight from central casting. Because of its length and its episodic nature, some people have compared this to the big nineteenth-century novels, but that's a strange connection to want to make with a story like this, which takes its narrative inspiration much more from Barbusse, Genevoix and Chevallier (as the afterword explicitly says). Problem is I'm not sure Pierre Lemaitre really comes out of this comparison well, which is a polite way of saying that he definitely doesn't 鈥� many parts of his book are good fun, but you'd do a lot better to read Barbusse, Genevoix and Chevallier instead.
November 13, 2019
Independientemente de que haya ganado un gran premio literario en su pa铆s (el Goncourt 2013), para m铆, esta ha sido una gran novela en todos los sentidos, de principio a fin. La primera novela que leo de Lemaitre fuera de su famoso detective Verhoeven, y no s贸lo no me ha decepcionado, si no que ha elevado a este autor a una categor铆a a煤n superior, si es que ello era posible.
La novela, que aborda un gran dram贸n (la vuelta de los soldados franceses a sus hogares tras la Gran Guerra), lo hace bajo el paraguas del estilo picaresco, y, fr谩ncamente, Monsieur Lemaitre, 隆me quito el sombrero! Consigue un drama tan crudo y funesto, bordeando en lo desagradable (el personaje de 脡douard, que, sin embargo, es humanizado de un modo antol贸gico), y lo mezcla con tanta iron铆a y humor, que el envoltorio final envuelve un caramelo exquisito, un producto que he devorado con delectaci贸n a cada p谩gina. Literatura de muchos quilates.
PD: Existe una adaptaci贸n cinematogr谩fica, dirigida por Albert Dupontel, y guionizada por el escritor, que, apenas devorada la novela, he procedido a visionar. Es una adaptaci贸n muy, pero que muy libre de la novela, y tampoco tiene desperdicio alguno.
La novela, que aborda un gran dram贸n (la vuelta de los soldados franceses a sus hogares tras la Gran Guerra), lo hace bajo el paraguas del estilo picaresco, y, fr谩ncamente, Monsieur Lemaitre, 隆me quito el sombrero! Consigue un drama tan crudo y funesto, bordeando en lo desagradable (el personaje de 脡douard, que, sin embargo, es humanizado de un modo antol贸gico), y lo mezcla con tanta iron铆a y humor, que el envoltorio final envuelve un caramelo exquisito, un producto que he devorado con delectaci贸n a cada p谩gina. Literatura de muchos quilates.
PD: Existe una adaptaci贸n cinematogr谩fica, dirigida por Albert Dupontel, y guionizada por el escritor, que, apenas devorada la novela, he procedido a visionar. Es una adaptaci贸n muy, pero que muy libre de la novela, y tampoco tiene desperdicio alguno.
January 17, 2021
S茅 de sobra que no debo hacerlo, pero a veces me pillan con la guardia baja y accedo, vamos que lo le铆 por compromiso. Lamentablemente mis reticencias estaban justificadas, la novela es entretenida, tiene un inicio trepidante pero poco m谩s. Y sin embargo lo termin茅, soy d茅bil, ya les digo, no pude resistirme al comez贸n picajoso del 鈥渜u茅 pasar谩鈥�. En cualquier caso, solo lo recomiendo como posible libro playero-piscinero.
June 3, 2023
鬲丕 丕蹖賳鈥屫� 讴賴 賲賳 丕胤賱丕毓 丿丕乇賲 爻賴 鬲乇噩賲賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿 (賲乇鬲囟蹖 讴賱丕賳鬲乇蹖丕賳貙 賲賴爻鬲蹖 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖 賵 倬乇賵蹖夭 卮賴丿蹖) 讴賴 賲賳 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺丕賳賲 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖貙 賳卮乇 賲丕賴蹖 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賲. 丕夭 胤乇賮蹖 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 丌賯丕蹖 卮賴丿蹖 乇丕 賴賲 丿乇 丿爻鬲乇爻 丿丕卮鬲賲. 噩爻鬲賴鈥� 诏乇蹖禺鬲賴 亘賴 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 丌賯丕蹖 卮賴丿蹖 賴賲 賳诏丕賴 讴乇丿賲 賵 賲鬲賵噩賴 卮丿賲 蹖讴爻乇蹖 賱睾丕鬲 賵 噩賲賱丕鬲 丿乇 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 丌賯丕蹖 卮賴丿蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 丿乇 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺丕賳賲 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇丿 賵 爻丕賳爻賵乇 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� (讴賴 丕賱亘鬲賴 夭蹖丕丿 賳亘賵丿賳丿). 丿乇亘丕乇賴 禺賵亘 賵 亘丿 丕蹖賳 丿賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗁� 賯囟丕賵鬲 亘讴賳賲 賵賱蹖 丕夭 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺丕賳賲 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖 乇丕囟蹖 亘賵丿賲. 趩賳丿 賳賲賵賳賴 丕夭 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 丿賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 乇丕 丿乇 亘禺卮 丌禺乇 亘乇丕蹖鬲丕賳 诏匕丕卮鬲賴鈥屫з�.
賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 賴賲賴鈥� 趩蹖夭 乇丕貙 孬乇賵鬲貙 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 蹖丕 卮丕蹖爻鬲诏蹖 乇丕貙 亘乇 讴爻蹖 亘禺卮賵丿貙 丕賲丕 禺賵卮鈥� 丕賯亘丕賱蹖 乇丕 賳賴貙 賳賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 丕蹖賳 丿蹖诏乇 夭蹖丕丿賴 丕夭 丨丿 賳丕毓丕丿賱丕賳賴 丕爻鬲. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄢鄹 讴鬲丕亘
讴丕爻亘蹖 丿乇 噩賳诏 爻賵丿 賮乇丕賵丕賳蹖 丿乇 亘乇丿丕乇丿貙 丨鬲蹖 倬爻鈥� 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 噩賳诏. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥� 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄢鄯 讴鬲丕亘
亘蹖 倬賵賱蹖 賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿蹖 賲孬賱 倬丕讴 丿蹖賳蹖 賵 賳馗丕賲 丕乇亘丕亘-乇毓蹖鬲蹖 丕爻鬲: 賴乇诏夭 讴丕賲賱丕賸 丕夭 賲蹖丕賳 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賵 丌孬丕乇 丌賳 鬲丕 賳爻賱鈥屬囏� 亘毓丿 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕乇丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄郯鄹 讴鬲丕亘
丿乇 禺丕賳賴鈥屰� 倬賵賱鈥屫ж辟囏� 賴賲賴鈥� 趩蹖夭 賵 賴賲賴 讴爻 夭蹖亘丕 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丨鬲蹖 賮賯乇丕. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄鄄酃 讴鬲丕亘
丨鬲蹖 卮丕丿蹖鈥屬囏й� 亘夭乇诏 賴賲 乇丿蹖 丕夭 鬲兀爻賮 亘乇丕蹖賲丕賳 亘丕賯蹖 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж辟嗀� 丿乇 賴賲賴鈥屰� 鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屬囏й� 賲丕貙 鬲賴 賲丕賳丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 讴丕爻鬲蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥� 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄鄞鄱 讴鬲丕亘
賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁� 趩乇丕 丕蹖賳 禺丕賳賴鈥屬囏й� 賮爻丕丿 乇丕 丕睾賱亘 鬲賵蹖 讴賵趩賴鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 讴賴 賳丕賲鈥屬囏й� 賲匕賴亘蹖 丿丕乇賳丿鈥� 卮丕蹖丿 賳卮丕賳賴鈥屰� 丕丨鬲乇丕賲 賮爻賯鈥� 賵 賮噩賵乇 丕爻鬲 亘賴 倬丕讴蹖 賵 鬲賯賵丕. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞郾鄄 讴鬲丕亘
**
丌賱亘乇 囟賲賳 丕蹖賳鈥屭┵� 丌賲丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 丕夭 丿丕乇亘爻鬲鈥屬囏� 亘丕賱丕 亘乇賵丿 (賳乇丿亘丕賳 賴丕蹖蹖 乇丕 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱丕 乇賮鬲賳 丕夭 爻賳诏乇賴丕 亘賴 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫辟佖嗀� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丕爻賲 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呟屫嗀� 丕賳诏丕乇 氐丨亘鬲 丕夭 蹖讴 丿賵乇賳賲丕 亘賴 賲蹖丕賳 亘賵丿) 賵 亘丕 爻乇 亘賴 夭蹖乇 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賴 亘賴 爻賵蹖 禺胤賵胤 丿卮賲賳 蹖賵乇卮 亘亘乇丿貙 亘賴 禺賵丿卮 诏賮鬲: 芦乇賵夭 丕夭賳賵 乇賵夭蹖 丕夭賳賵. 禄 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄹 讴鬲丕亘
丌賱亘乇 亘丕 禺賵丿 诏賮鬲: 芦倬爻 賲丕 丿賵亘丕乇賴 鬲噩賴蹖夭 卮丿蹖賲貙 丌賲丕丿賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱丕 乇賮鬲賳 丕夭 趩賵亘 亘爻鬲 丕毓丿丕賲 (賳乇丿亘丕賳蹖 乇丕 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 丌賲丿賳 丕夭 爻賳诏乇 亘賴 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ必嗀� 趩賳蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呟屫嗀�. 诏賵蹖蹖 賳賲丕蹖蹖 亘賵丿 丕夭 丌蹖賳丿賴) 賵 亘丕 爻乇 亘賴 爻賵蹖 禺胤賵胤 丿卮賲賳 賴噩賵賲 亘乇丿賳.禄 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄣 讴鬲丕亘
*
丕丿賵丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 毓囟賱賴鈥屬囏й� 亘賴賲 賮卮乇丿賴鈥屫ж� 乇丕 丌夭丕丿 爻丕夭丿貙 诏乇丿賳卮 乇丕 丿乇 诏賱 賮乇賵 亘乇丿. 禺賳讴蹖 丕賳丿讴蹖 丕丨爻丕爻 讴乇丿. 丌賳鈥屭嗁� 乇丕 丨丕賱丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇卮 亘賵丿貙 賵丕乇賵賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫屫� 丕賳诏丕乇 乇賮鬲賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 蹖蹖賱丕賯 賵 夭蹖乇 丿乇禺鬲鈥屬囏� 丿乇丕夭 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘賵丿貙 丿禺鬲乇蹖 賴賲 讴賳丕乇卮. 賲賵囟賵毓蹖 讴賴 賴乇诏夭 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇蹖 亘乇丕蹖卮 丕鬲賮丕賯 賳蹖賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賵丿. 亘賴 丿禺鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 賴賲 讴賴 亘乇賲蹖鈥屫堌必� 丿丕賳卮噩賵賴丕蹖 丿丕賳卮讴丿賴鈥屰� 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 夭蹖亘丕 亘賵丿賳丿 讴賴 亘賴 倬爻鬲 丕賵 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌必嗀�. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞鄯 讴鬲丕亘
丕丿賵丕乇丿貙 亘乇丕蹖 卮賱 讴乇丿賳 毓囟賱丕鬲卮貙 倬爻 诏乇丿賳 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 诏賱 賮乇賵 亘乇丿. 丕丨爻丕爻 讴乇丿 讴賲蹖 禺賳讴 卮丿賴鈥� 丕爻鬲. 丕锟斤拷賳賵賳 丌賳趩賴 乇丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇卮 亘賵丿 賵丕乇賵賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫屫�. 诏賵蹖蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 卮賴乇 賵 夭蹖乇 丿乇禺鬲丕賳貙 讴賳丕乇 丿禺鬲乇蹖 丿乇丕夭 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘丕卮丿. 賴乇诏夭 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 趩賳蹖賳 賵囟毓蹖 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇蹖 賳丿蹖丿賴 亘賵丿. 丿禺鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丿禺鬲乇讴丕賳 毓卮乇鬲讴丿賴鈥屬囏й� 丕胤乇丕賮 芦賴賳乇賴丕蹖 夭蹖亘丕禄 亘賵丿賳丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄢鄹 讴鬲丕亘
*
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 丕爻鬲 讴賴 鬲乇讴卮 禺賲倬丕乇賴鈥屫й� 亘賴 亘夭乇诏蹖 蹖讴 亘卮賯丕亘 亘賴 爻乇丕睾卮 賲蹖鈥屫③屫�. 賳爻亘鬲丕賸 囟禺蹖賲 賵 亘丕 爻乇毓鬲蹖 爻乇诏蹖噩賴鈥屫①堌�. 亘蹖鈥屫蹿� 丕蹖賳 倬丕爻禺 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丕爻鬲 亘賴 賳丕爻夭丕賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丨賵丕賱賴 卮丕賳 讴乇丿賴. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄣鄣 讴鬲丕亘
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴賳诏丕賲貙 鬲乇讴卮蹖 丕夭 禺賲倬丕乇賴貙 亘賴 亘夭乇诏蹖 蹖讴 亘卮賯丕亘 爻賵倬鈥屫堌臂屫� 亘賴 爻賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫③屫�. 賳爻亘鬲丕賸 賯胤賵乇 丕爻鬲 賵 爻乇毓鬲蹖 爻乇爻丕賲鈥屫①堌� 丿丕乇丿. 卮丕蹖丿 倬丕爻禺 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞鄣 讴鬲丕亘
*
爻賳鬲 讴賱賵鬲蹖賱丿貙 丿禺鬲乇 卮蹖賱倬乇蹖讴 賵 讴丕乇賴鈥屫� 亘賵丿 賵 讴丕乇賴鈥屫� 丕夭 丌賳 賴賮鬲 禺胤鈥屬囏й� 乇賵夭诏丕乇. 丕丿賵丕乇 鬲氐賵蹖乇卮 乇丕 丿乇 賵囟毓蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘賵丿: 亘賱毓蹖丿賴鈥� 卮丿賴 亘賴鈥� 賵爻蹖賱賴鈥屰� 毓賲賵蹖卮 诏賵丿賴 跇蹖賳乇蹖賱 蹖丕 亘賴 卮讴賱 賲丕丿賴 爻诏蹖 鬲丕夭蹖 丿乇 丿爻鬲 讴賱賵蹖爻 賵 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丨丿賵丿 爻丕賱 鄞酃鄢 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 丿乇丨丕賱 賱蹖爻蹖丿賳 賲丕鬲丨鬲 卮丕賴 亘賵乇诏賳丿賴丕貙 賴賲乇丕賴 亘丕 乇賲蹖貙 丕爻賯賮 乇賳爻. 丕蹖賳 賳賯丕卮蹖鈥屬囏� 亘丕毓孬 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 亘乇丕蹖 爻賵賲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賵 丕蹖賳 丿賮毓賴 亘賴鈥� 胤賵乇 賯胤毓蹖 丕夭 賲丿乇爻賴 丕禺乇丕噩 卮賵丿. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄱郾 讴鬲丕亘
爻賳鬲 讴賱賵鬲蹖賱丿 讴賴 爻賱蹖胤賴鈥屫й� 鬲賲丕賲鈥� 毓蹖丕乇 亘賵丿 賵 胤乇丨鈥屬囏й� 夭賳賳丿賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丕丿賵丕乇丿 丕夭 丕賵 讴卮蹖丿 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 亘乇丕蹖 爻賵賲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賵 丕蹖賳鈥� 亘丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 丕夭 賲丿乇爻賴 丕禺乇丕噩 卮賵丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄣郯 讴鬲丕亘
鈥�
賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 賴賲賴鈥� 趩蹖夭 乇丕貙 孬乇賵鬲貙 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿 蹖丕 卮丕蹖爻鬲诏蹖 乇丕貙 亘乇 讴爻蹖 亘禺卮賵丿貙 丕賲丕 禺賵卮鈥� 丕賯亘丕賱蹖 乇丕 賳賴貙 賳賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 丕蹖賳 丿蹖诏乇 夭蹖丕丿賴 丕夭 丨丿 賳丕毓丕丿賱丕賳賴 丕爻鬲. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄢鄹 讴鬲丕亘
讴丕爻亘蹖 丿乇 噩賳诏 爻賵丿 賮乇丕賵丕賳蹖 丿乇 亘乇丿丕乇丿貙 丨鬲蹖 倬爻鈥� 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 噩賳诏. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥� 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄢鄯 讴鬲丕亘
亘蹖 倬賵賱蹖 賵 賳蹖丕夭賲賳丿蹖 賲孬賱 倬丕讴 丿蹖賳蹖 賵 賳馗丕賲 丕乇亘丕亘-乇毓蹖鬲蹖 丕爻鬲: 賴乇诏夭 讴丕賲賱丕賸 丕夭 賲蹖丕賳 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賵 丌孬丕乇 丌賳 鬲丕 賳爻賱鈥屬囏� 亘毓丿 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕乇丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄郯鄹 讴鬲丕亘
丿乇 禺丕賳賴鈥屰� 倬賵賱鈥屫ж辟囏� 賴賲賴鈥� 趩蹖夭 賵 賴賲賴 讴爻 夭蹖亘丕 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丨鬲蹖 賮賯乇丕. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄鄄酃 讴鬲丕亘
丨鬲蹖 卮丕丿蹖鈥屬囏й� 亘夭乇诏 賴賲 乇丿蹖 丕夭 鬲兀爻賮 亘乇丕蹖賲丕賳 亘丕賯蹖 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж辟嗀� 丿乇 賴賲賴鈥屰� 鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屬囏й� 賲丕貙 鬲賴 賲丕賳丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 讴丕爻鬲蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥� 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄄鄞鄱 讴鬲丕亘
賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁� 趩乇丕 丕蹖賳 禺丕賳賴鈥屬囏й� 賮爻丕丿 乇丕 丕睾賱亘 鬲賵蹖 讴賵趩賴鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 讴賴 賳丕賲鈥屬囏й� 賲匕賴亘蹖 丿丕乇賳丿鈥� 卮丕蹖丿 賳卮丕賳賴鈥屰� 丕丨鬲乇丕賲 賮爻賯鈥� 賵 賮噩賵乇 丕爻鬲 亘賴 倬丕讴蹖 賵 鬲賯賵丕. 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞郾鄄 讴鬲丕亘
**
丌賱亘乇 囟賲賳 丕蹖賳鈥屭┵� 丌賲丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 丕夭 丿丕乇亘爻鬲鈥屬囏� 亘丕賱丕 亘乇賵丿 (賳乇丿亘丕賳 賴丕蹖蹖 乇丕 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱丕 乇賮鬲賳 丕夭 爻賳诏乇賴丕 亘賴 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫辟佖嗀� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丕爻賲 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呟屫嗀� 丕賳诏丕乇 氐丨亘鬲 丕夭 蹖讴 丿賵乇賳賲丕 亘賴 賲蹖丕賳 亘賵丿) 賵 亘丕 爻乇 亘賴 夭蹖乇 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賴 亘賴 爻賵蹖 禺胤賵胤 丿卮賲賳 蹖賵乇卮 亘亘乇丿貙 亘賴 禺賵丿卮 诏賮鬲: 芦乇賵夭 丕夭賳賵 乇賵夭蹖 丕夭賳賵. 禄 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄹 讴鬲丕亘
丌賱亘乇 亘丕 禺賵丿 诏賮鬲: 芦倬爻 賲丕 丿賵亘丕乇賴 鬲噩賴蹖夭 卮丿蹖賲貙 丌賲丕丿賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱丕 乇賮鬲賳 丕夭 趩賵亘 亘爻鬲 丕毓丿丕賲 (賳乇丿亘丕賳蹖 乇丕 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 丌賲丿賳 丕夭 爻賳诏乇 亘賴 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ必嗀� 趩賳蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屬嗀з呟屫嗀�. 诏賵蹖蹖 賳賲丕蹖蹖 亘賵丿 丕夭 丌蹖賳丿賴) 賵 亘丕 爻乇 亘賴 爻賵蹖 禺胤賵胤 丿卮賲賳 賴噩賵賲 亘乇丿賳.禄 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 郾鄣 讴鬲丕亘
*
丕丿賵丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 毓囟賱賴鈥屬囏й� 亘賴賲 賮卮乇丿賴鈥屫ж� 乇丕 丌夭丕丿 爻丕夭丿貙 诏乇丿賳卮 乇丕 丿乇 诏賱 賮乇賵 亘乇丿. 禺賳讴蹖 丕賳丿讴蹖 丕丨爻丕爻 讴乇丿. 丌賳鈥屭嗁� 乇丕 丨丕賱丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇卮 亘賵丿貙 賵丕乇賵賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫屫� 丕賳诏丕乇 乇賮鬲賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 蹖蹖賱丕賯 賵 夭蹖乇 丿乇禺鬲鈥屬囏� 丿乇丕夭 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘賵丿貙 丿禺鬲乇蹖 賴賲 讴賳丕乇卮. 賲賵囟賵毓蹖 讴賴 賴乇诏夭 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇蹖 亘乇丕蹖卮 丕鬲賮丕賯 賳蹖賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賵丿. 亘賴 丿禺鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 賴賲 讴賴 亘乇賲蹖鈥屫堌必� 丿丕賳卮噩賵賴丕蹖 丿丕賳卮讴丿賴鈥屰� 賴賳乇賴丕蹖 夭蹖亘丕 亘賵丿賳丿 讴賴 亘賴 倬爻鬲 丕賵 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌必嗀�. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞鄯 讴鬲丕亘
丕丿賵丕乇丿貙 亘乇丕蹖 卮賱 讴乇丿賳 毓囟賱丕鬲卮貙 倬爻 诏乇丿賳 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 诏賱 賮乇賵 亘乇丿. 丕丨爻丕爻 讴乇丿 讴賲蹖 禺賳讴 卮丿賴鈥� 丕爻鬲. 丕锟斤拷賳賵賳 丌賳趩賴 乇丕 倬卮鬲 爻乇卮 亘賵丿 賵丕乇賵賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫屫�. 诏賵蹖蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 卮賴乇 賵 夭蹖乇 丿乇禺鬲丕賳貙 讴賳丕乇 丿禺鬲乇蹖 丿乇丕夭 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘丕卮丿. 賴乇诏夭 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 趩賳蹖賳 賵囟毓蹖 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇蹖 賳丿蹖丿賴 亘賵丿. 丿禺鬲乇賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丿禺鬲乇讴丕賳 毓卮乇鬲讴丿賴鈥屬囏й� 丕胤乇丕賮 芦賴賳乇賴丕蹖 夭蹖亘丕禄 亘賵丿賳丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄢鄹 讴鬲丕亘
*
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 丕爻鬲 讴賴 鬲乇讴卮 禺賲倬丕乇賴鈥屫й� 亘賴 亘夭乇诏蹖 蹖讴 亘卮賯丕亘 亘賴 爻乇丕睾卮 賲蹖鈥屫③屫�. 賳爻亘鬲丕賸 囟禺蹖賲 賵 亘丕 爻乇毓鬲蹖 爻乇诏蹖噩賴鈥屫①堌�. 亘蹖鈥屫蹿� 丕蹖賳 倬丕爻禺 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 丕爻鬲 亘賴 賳丕爻夭丕賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丨賵丕賱賴 卮丕賳 讴乇丿賴. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄣鄣 讴鬲丕亘
丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴賳诏丕賲貙 鬲乇讴卮蹖 丕夭 禺賲倬丕乇賴貙 亘賴 亘夭乇诏蹖 蹖讴 亘卮賯丕亘 爻賵倬鈥屫堌臂屫� 亘賴 爻賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫③屫�. 賳爻亘鬲丕賸 賯胤賵乇 丕爻鬲 賵 爻乇毓鬲蹖 爻乇爻丕賲鈥屫①堌� 丿丕乇丿. 卮丕蹖丿 倬丕爻禺 禺丿丕蹖丕賳 亘丕卮丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄞鄣 讴鬲丕亘
*
爻賳鬲 讴賱賵鬲蹖賱丿貙 丿禺鬲乇 卮蹖賱倬乇蹖讴 賵 讴丕乇賴鈥屫� 亘賵丿 賵 讴丕乇賴鈥屫� 丕夭 丌賳 賴賮鬲 禺胤鈥屬囏й� 乇賵夭诏丕乇. 丕丿賵丕乇 鬲氐賵蹖乇卮 乇丕 丿乇 賵囟毓蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳 讴卮蹖丿賴 亘賵丿: 亘賱毓蹖丿賴鈥� 卮丿賴 亘賴鈥� 賵爻蹖賱賴鈥屰� 毓賲賵蹖卮 诏賵丿賴 跇蹖賳乇蹖賱 蹖丕 亘賴 卮讴賱 賲丕丿賴 爻诏蹖 鬲丕夭蹖 丿乇 丿爻鬲 讴賱賵蹖爻 賵 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丨丿賵丿 爻丕賱 鄞酃鄢 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 丿乇丨丕賱 賱蹖爻蹖丿賳 賲丕鬲丨鬲 卮丕賴 亘賵乇诏賳丿賴丕貙 賴賲乇丕賴 亘丕 乇賲蹖貙 丕爻賯賮 乇賳爻. 丕蹖賳 賳賯丕卮蹖鈥屬囏� 亘丕毓孬 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 亘乇丕蹖 爻賵賲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賵 丕蹖賳 丿賮毓賴 亘賴鈥� 胤賵乇 賯胤毓蹖 丕夭 賲丿乇爻賴 丕禺乇丕噩 卮賵丿. 卮賴丿蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄱郾 讴鬲丕亘
爻賳鬲 讴賱賵鬲蹖賱丿 讴賴 爻賱蹖胤賴鈥屫й� 鬲賲丕賲鈥� 毓蹖丕乇 亘賵丿 賵 胤乇丨鈥屬囏й� 夭賳賳丿賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丕丿賵丕乇丿 丕夭 丕賵 讴卮蹖丿 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 亘乇丕蹖 爻賵賲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賵 丕蹖賳鈥� 亘丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 丕夭 賲丿乇爻賴 丕禺乇丕噩 卮賵丿. 亘丨乇蹖賳蹖. 氐賮丨賴鈥屰� 鄣郯 讴鬲丕亘
鈥�
September 29, 2023
賳賲蹖 丿丕賳賲 丿乇 賵氐賮 丕卮 趩賴 亘诏賵蹖賲 賵 趩賴 亘賳賵蹖爻賲貙 丌賳 趩賳丕賳 乇賵丨賲 丕夭 賴賲 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 噩賲毓 讴乇丿賳 丌賳 賴丕 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 賴賲 讴丕乇蹖 丕爻鬲 亘爻 丿卮賵丕乇貙 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘賽 賱賵賲鬲乇 亘乇 爻乇 賲賳 丌賵乇丿賴 丕爻鬲. 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 亘乇丕蹖賲 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 卮丿貙 賳賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 丿賱蹖賱卮 亘丿 亘賵丿賳 賵 賳趩爻亘 亘賵丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕卮丿 賳賴貙 亘賱讴賴 亘賱毓讴爻貙 賴乇 禺胤 賵 賴乇 氐賮丨賴 丕卮 亘賴 噩丕賳 賵 鬲賳賲 賲蹖 賳卮爻鬲貙 鬲賳賲 乇丕 賱賽賴 賲蹖 讴乇丿 賵 丨爻 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱 賵氐賮蹖 乇丕 丿乇 賲賳 亘乇 賲蹖 丕賳诏蹖禺鬲 讴賴 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳賲 趩賴 亘賳丕賲賲 丕卮.
亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丿乇 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕 蹖丕 亘賴 毓亘丕乇鬲蹖 賲賱賲賵爻 鬲乇貙 丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲. 賯蹖丕賲鬲 讴丿丕賲 丕爻鬲責 賯蹖丕賲鬲 乇丕 賴賲丕賳 賲丨賮賱 倬爻 丕夭 賲乇诏 賲蹖 丿丕賳蹖丿責 丕诏乇 賯蹖丕賲鬲 丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 亘乇丕蹖鬲丕賳 乇賯賲 亘禺賵乇丿 趩賴責 丌蹖丕 賲乇诏 乇丕 亘賴 夭賳丿诏丕賳蹖 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賳賲蹖 丿賴蹖丿責 賵賯鬲蹖 讴賴 丕夭 夭蹖乇 禺乇賵丕乇賴丕 禺丕讴 賳噩丕鬲 賲蹖 蹖丕亘蹖丿 賵 禺賵卮丨丕賱 丕夭 鬲賳賮爻 賴賵丕 賵 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 乇賵丨 亘賴 鬲賳蹖 賱賴 卮丿賴 丕夭 丨噩賲賽 賮卮丕乇賽 夭賲蹖賳 亘乇 鬲賳貙 丕诏乇 賲蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲蹖丿 夭蹖賳 倬爻 趩賴 趩蹖夭蹖 丿乇 丕賳鬲馗丕乇鬲丕賳 賴爻鬲貙 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 噩丕 賲蹖 诏匕丕卮鬲蹖丿 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丨乇氐 賵 胤賲毓 丌賳 乇丕 丿丕乇賳丿. 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘賴 禺賵丿蹖 丕夭 倬卮鬲 卮賱蹖讴 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賴賲乇夭賲 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 趩丕賱賴 丕蹖 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏� 鬲丕 噩丕賳 丿賴丿 賵 乇匕丕賱鬲 賴丕蹖卮 乇丕 讴爻蹖 丕賮卮丕 賳讴賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賳丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 賳乇禺 乇賵夭 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖卮丕賳 賴蹖趩 讴爻蹖 噩夭 禺賵丿卮丕賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 禺賵丕賴 噩賳诏 亘丕卮丿 禺賵丕賴 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 氐賱丨. 丕蹖賳 匕丕鬲賽 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 鬲丿丕賵賲 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 賲蹖 賳賲丕蹖丕賳丿.
讴賲 爻賳 賵 爻丕賱丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘丕賱丕噩亘丕乇 亘乇丕蹖賽 賲丕賲 賵胤賳 賵 丿賮丕毓 丕夭 讴蹖丕賳賽 禺賵蹖卮 賱亘丕爻 乇夭賲 賲蹖 倬賵卮賳丿貙 噩丕賳卮丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕夭賲丕賳丿诏丕賳卮丕賳 丿丕乇丕蹖 丕乇夭卮蹖 賵丕賮乇 丕爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賮乇賲丕賳丿賴丕賳 卮丕賳 賵 噩賳诏 胤賱亘丕賳 賵 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 賵丕賴賲賴 蹖 讴卮賵乇 诏卮丕蹖蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 倬卮蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖 丕乇夭賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕 賳賴 噩丕賳 丕賳丿 賵 賳賴 鬲賳貙 丌賳 賴丕 鬲亘丿蹖賱 亘賴 毓丿丿 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿貙 毓丿丿蹖 亘蹖丕賳诏乇 鬲毓丿丕丿貙 賮丕乇睾 丕夭 夭賳丿賴 亘賵丿賳 賵 夭蹖爻鬲 丌賳賴丕貙 賴賲丕賳賳丿 卮賽蹖亍 丕蹖 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮貙 毓丿賴 丕蹖 爻丕賱賲 亘乇 賲蹖 诏乇丿賳丿 賵 毓丿賴 丕蹖 鬲讴賴 鬲讴賴貙 賯胤毓賴 賯胤毓賴 蹖丕 讴丕賲賱丕 賲鬲賱丕卮蹖 卮丿賴 賲蹖 賲丕賳賳丿 賵 賴賲丕賳噩丕 賲丿賮賵賳 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 蹖丕 禺賵乇丕讴 丨蹖賵丕賳丕鬲 丿蹖诏乇 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿.
丨丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 噩賳诏 賴賲丕賳 噩丕賳 賴丕蹖賽 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮貙 丕乇噩 賵 賯購乇亘蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 賵 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賳賲丕丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱蹖丿賳. 賴賲丕賳 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿乇 噩亘賴賴 亘賴 禺賵丿蹖 鬲蹖乇 賲蹖夭丿賳丿 丨丕賱 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賲丿丕賮毓 亘賴 噩丕蹖 賲丕賳丿賳 賵 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 噩爻賲 丌賳 賴丕 亘賴 賵胤賳 禺賵蹖卮 賵 诏乇丕賲蹖 丿丕卮鬲 蹖丕丿賽 丌賳 賴丕. 丕蹖賳 賴賲丕賳 賲乇丿賴 禺賵乇蹖 丕爻鬲. 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 亘賴 鬲賳 賱賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 賴賲 倬丕卮蹖丿賴 賵 鬲讴賴 鬲讴賴 卮丿賴 爻乇亘丕夭 賵胤賳 賴賲 乇丨賲 賳賲蹖 讴賳賳丿. 賴賲賵丕乇賴 亘賴 賮讴乇 爻賵丿 賵 賲賳賮毓鬲 禺賵蹖卮 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丨鬲蹖 卮丿賴 亘丕 倬乇 讴乇丿賳 鬲丕亘賵鬲 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 禺乇丿爻丕賱丕賳 賴賲 讴賵趩讴 丕爻鬲 亘丕 禺乇賵丕乇蹖 丕夭 禺丕讴貙 賴賲丕賳 禺丕讴蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖卮 噩丕賳 賴丕 賮丿丕 卮丿賴.
賲丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賴丕 賴賲蹖卮賴 夭賳丿诏丕賳 乇丕 賮乇丕賲賵卮 讴乇丿賴 賵 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 倬乇爻鬲蹖丿賴 丕蹖賲. 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 亘丕夭诏卮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏貙 丿乇 賮賱丕讴鬲賽 鬲賲丕賲 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 賲蹖 夭賳賳丿貙 丿乇 賳丕賳 卮亘卮丕賳 賲丕賳丿賴 丕賳丿貙 亘丕 噩爻賲 賳丕賯氐卮丕賳 讴丕乇蹖 丕夭 丿爻鬲卮丕賳 亘乇 賳賲蹖 丌蹖丿 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖 讴賴 賲乇丿賲丕賳 賵 丨丕讴賲丕賳 賵 賮乇賲丕賳丿賴丕賳 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 丕賳丿 鬲丕 蹖丕丿 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 诏乇丕賲蹖 亘丿丕乇賳丿貙 蹖丕丿賵丕乇賴 賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 賲禺丕乇噩蹖 诏夭丕賮貙 爻丕禺鬲賳 賳賲丕丿 賵 賲噩爻賲賴 賴丕蹖蹖 爻賳亘賱蹖讴 丕夭 讴卮鬲賴 卮丿诏丕賳. 趩賴 賳賲丕丿蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 噩丕賳 爻丕賱賲 亘賴 丿乇 亘乇丿賳丿責 丌賳 賴丕 禺賵丿賿 鬲丕乇蹖禺賽 賳丕胤賯 丕賳丿貙 夭禺賲 賴丕 乇丕 亘乇 鬲賳 丿丕乇賳丿貙 乇賵丨卮丕賳 丿乇 賴賲 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 賵 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 丌賳. 趩賴 讴爻蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 丌賳賴丕 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 丕夭 賲氐丕卅亘 噩賳诏 亘诏賵蹖丿責 趩賴 讴爻蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 賳賲丕丿 賵 毓亘乇鬲蹖 亘丕卮丿 亘乇丕蹖 噩賳诏 胤賱亘蹖 賵 禺賵賳禺賵丕乇蹖責 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 賴賲蹖賳 賮乇丕賲賵卮 賳讴乇丿賳 丌賳 賴丕爻鬲貙 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 賲乇丕賯亘鬲 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕貙 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 亘賴 賮乇丕賲賵卮蹖 賳爻倬乇丿賳 丌賳 賴丕. 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賳賵噩賵丕賳蹖 卮丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 诏賱賵賱賴 賵 禺賵賳 賵 噩賳丕夭賴 賵 亘丕乇賵鬲 賵 亘賲亘 賵 賳丕乇賳噩讴 爻倬乇蹖 讴乇丿賳丿. 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖卮丕賳 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲 鬲亘丿蹖賱 賳讴賳蹖賲. 賳卮賵丿 讴賴 丌賳 賴丕 乇賵夭蹖 趩賳丿蹖賳 賲乇鬲亘賴 丕夭 夭賳丿賴 賲丕賳丿賳 禺賵蹖卮 倬卮蹖賲丕賳 卮賵賳丿. 丿蹖丿丕乇 賴賲诏蹖 賲丕賳 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲貙 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 丿乇 賯蹖丕賲鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖賲丕賳 乇賯賲 賲蹖 夭賳賳丿 禺賵卮丨丕賱 亘丕卮蹖賲. 倬爻 " 亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丿乇 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕".
亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丿乇 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕 蹖丕 亘賴 毓亘丕乇鬲蹖 賲賱賲賵爻 鬲乇貙 丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲. 賯蹖丕賲鬲 讴丿丕賲 丕爻鬲責 賯蹖丕賲鬲 乇丕 賴賲丕賳 賲丨賮賱 倬爻 丕夭 賲乇诏 賲蹖 丿丕賳蹖丿責 丕诏乇 賯蹖丕賲鬲 丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 亘乇丕蹖鬲丕賳 乇賯賲 亘禺賵乇丿 趩賴責 丌蹖丕 賲乇诏 乇丕 亘賴 夭賳丿诏丕賳蹖 鬲乇噩蹖丨 賳賲蹖 丿賴蹖丿責 賵賯鬲蹖 讴賴 丕夭 夭蹖乇 禺乇賵丕乇賴丕 禺丕讴 賳噩丕鬲 賲蹖 蹖丕亘蹖丿 賵 禺賵卮丨丕賱 丕夭 鬲賳賮爻 賴賵丕 賵 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 乇賵丨 亘賴 鬲賳蹖 賱賴 卮丿賴 丕夭 丨噩賲賽 賮卮丕乇賽 夭賲蹖賳 亘乇 鬲賳貙 丕诏乇 賲蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲蹖丿 夭蹖賳 倬爻 趩賴 趩蹖夭蹖 丿乇 丕賳鬲馗丕乇鬲丕賳 賴爻鬲貙 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 噩丕 賲蹖 诏匕丕卮鬲蹖丿 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丨乇氐 賵 胤賲毓 丌賳 乇丕 丿丕乇賳丿. 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘賴 禺賵丿蹖 丕夭 倬卮鬲 卮賱蹖讴 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賴賲乇夭賲 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 趩丕賱賴 丕蹖 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏� 鬲丕 噩丕賳 丿賴丿 賵 乇匕丕賱鬲 賴丕蹖卮 乇丕 讴爻蹖 丕賮卮丕 賳讴賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賳丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 賳乇禺 乇賵夭 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖卮丕賳 賴蹖趩 讴爻蹖 噩夭 禺賵丿卮丕賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 禺賵丕賴 噩賳诏 亘丕卮丿 禺賵丕賴 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 氐賱丨. 丕蹖賳 匕丕鬲賽 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 鬲丿丕賵賲 夭賳丿诏蹖貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 賲蹖 賳賲丕蹖丕賳丿.
讴賲 爻賳 賵 爻丕賱丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘丕賱丕噩亘丕乇 亘乇丕蹖賽 賲丕賲 賵胤賳 賵 丿賮丕毓 丕夭 讴蹖丕賳賽 禺賵蹖卮 賱亘丕爻 乇夭賲 賲蹖 倬賵卮賳丿貙 噩丕賳卮丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕夭賲丕賳丿诏丕賳卮丕賳 丿丕乇丕蹖 丕乇夭卮蹖 賵丕賮乇 丕爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賮乇賲丕賳丿賴丕賳 卮丕賳 賵 噩賳诏 胤賱亘丕賳 賵 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 賵丕賴賲賴 蹖 讴卮賵乇 诏卮丕蹖蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 倬卮蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖 丕乇夭賳丿貙 丌賳 賴丕 賳賴 噩丕賳 丕賳丿 賵 賳賴 鬲賳貙 丌賳 賴丕 鬲亘丿蹖賱 亘賴 毓丿丿 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿貙 毓丿丿蹖 亘蹖丕賳诏乇 鬲毓丿丕丿貙 賮丕乇睾 丕夭 夭賳丿賴 亘賵丿賳 賵 夭蹖爻鬲 丌賳賴丕貙 賴賲丕賳賳丿 卮賽蹖亍 丕蹖 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮貙 毓丿賴 丕蹖 爻丕賱賲 亘乇 賲蹖 诏乇丿賳丿 賵 毓丿賴 丕蹖 鬲讴賴 鬲讴賴貙 賯胤毓賴 賯胤毓賴 蹖丕 讴丕賲賱丕 賲鬲賱丕卮蹖 卮丿賴 賲蹖 賲丕賳賳丿 賵 賴賲丕賳噩丕 賲丿賮賵賳 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 蹖丕 禺賵乇丕讴 丨蹖賵丕賳丕鬲 丿蹖诏乇 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿.
丨丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 噩賳诏 賴賲丕賳 噩丕賳 賴丕蹖賽 亘蹖 丕乇夭卮貙 丕乇噩 賵 賯購乇亘蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 賵 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賳賲丕丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 亘丕賱蹖丿賳. 賴賲丕賳 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 丿乇 噩亘賴賴 亘賴 禺賵丿蹖 鬲蹖乇 賲蹖夭丿賳丿 丨丕賱 賲蹖 卮賵賳丿 賲丿丕賮毓 亘賴 噩丕蹖 賲丕賳丿賳 賵 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 噩爻賲 丌賳 賴丕 亘賴 賵胤賳 禺賵蹖卮 賵 诏乇丕賲蹖 丿丕卮鬲 蹖丕丿賽 丌賳 賴丕. 丕蹖賳 賴賲丕賳 賲乇丿賴 禺賵乇蹖 丕爻鬲. 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 亘賴 鬲賳 賱賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 賴賲 倬丕卮蹖丿賴 賵 鬲讴賴 鬲讴賴 卮丿賴 爻乇亘丕夭 賵胤賳 賴賲 乇丨賲 賳賲蹖 讴賳賳丿. 賴賲賵丕乇賴 亘賴 賮讴乇 爻賵丿 賵 賲賳賮毓鬲 禺賵蹖卮 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丨鬲蹖 卮丿賴 亘丕 倬乇 讴乇丿賳 鬲丕亘賵鬲 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 禺乇丿爻丕賱丕賳 賴賲 讴賵趩讴 丕爻鬲 亘丕 禺乇賵丕乇蹖 丕夭 禺丕讴貙 賴賲丕賳 禺丕讴蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖卮 噩丕賳 賴丕 賮丿丕 卮丿賴.
賲丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賴丕 賴賲蹖卮賴 夭賳丿诏丕賳 乇丕 賮乇丕賲賵卮 讴乇丿賴 賵 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 倬乇爻鬲蹖丿賴 丕蹖賲. 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 亘丕夭诏卮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏貙 丿乇 賮賱丕讴鬲賽 鬲賲丕賲 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 賲蹖 夭賳賳丿貙 丿乇 賳丕賳 卮亘卮丕賳 賲丕賳丿賴 丕賳丿貙 亘丕 噩爻賲 賳丕賯氐卮丕賳 讴丕乇蹖 丕夭 丿爻鬲卮丕賳 亘乇 賳賲蹖 丌蹖丿 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖 讴賴 賲乇丿賲丕賳 賵 丨丕讴賲丕賳 賵 賮乇賲丕賳丿賴丕賳 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 丕賳丿 鬲丕 蹖丕丿 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 诏乇丕賲蹖 亘丿丕乇賳丿貙 蹖丕丿賵丕乇賴 賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 賲禺丕乇噩蹖 诏夭丕賮貙 爻丕禺鬲賳 賳賲丕丿 賵 賲噩爻賲賴 賴丕蹖蹖 爻賳亘賱蹖讴 丕夭 讴卮鬲賴 卮丿诏丕賳. 趩賴 賳賲丕丿蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 噩丕賳 爻丕賱賲 亘賴 丿乇 亘乇丿賳丿責 丌賳 賴丕 禺賵丿賿 鬲丕乇蹖禺賽 賳丕胤賯 丕賳丿貙 夭禺賲 賴丕 乇丕 亘乇 鬲賳 丿丕乇賳丿貙 乇賵丨卮丕賳 丿乇 賴賲 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 賵 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 丌賳. 趩賴 讴爻蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 丌賳賴丕 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 丕夭 賲氐丕卅亘 噩賳诏 亘诏賵蹖丿責 趩賴 讴爻蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳丿 賳賲丕丿 賵 毓亘乇鬲蹖 亘丕卮丿 亘乇丕蹖 噩賳诏 胤賱亘蹖 賵 禺賵賳禺賵丕乇蹖責 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 賴賲蹖賳 賮乇丕賲賵卮 賳讴乇丿賳 丌賳 賴丕爻鬲貙 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 賲乇丕賯亘鬲 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕貙 賯丿乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 亘賴 賮乇丕賲賵卮蹖 賳爻倬乇丿賳 丌賳 賴丕. 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賳賵噩賵丕賳蹖 卮丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 诏賱賵賱賴 賵 禺賵賳 賵 噩賳丕夭賴 賵 亘丕乇賵鬲 賵 亘賲亘 賵 賳丕乇賳噩讴 爻倬乇蹖 讴乇丿賳丿. 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖卮丕賳 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲 鬲亘丿蹖賱 賳讴賳蹖賲. 賳卮賵丿 讴賴 丌賳 賴丕 乇賵夭蹖 趩賳丿蹖賳 賲乇鬲亘賴 丕夭 夭賳丿賴 賲丕賳丿賳 禺賵蹖卮 倬卮蹖賲丕賳 卮賵賳丿. 丿蹖丿丕乇 賴賲诏蹖 賲丕賳 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲貙 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 丿乇 賯蹖丕賲鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖賲丕賳 乇賯賲 賲蹖 夭賳賳丿 禺賵卮丨丕賱 亘丕卮蹖賲. 倬爻 " 亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丿乇 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕".
June 25, 2015
Na stranu 膷injenica da obo啪avam francusku knji啪evnost, ovaj roman je fenomenalan! Odavno mi se nije desilo da danima ni拧ta drugo ne radim nego samo 膷itam jednu knjigu (obi膷no 膷itam nekoliko knjiga paralelno)... Potpuno zaslu啪ena Gonkurova nagrada. Iskrena preporuka svim ljubiteljima dobre, kvalitetne knji啪evnosti. Lep jezik, dobro vo膽ena pri膷a, likovi. Prevod je vrhunski, tako膽e oven膷an nagradom (zaslu啪eno)... Knjiga je 膷ista desetka. Sad mi je jo拧 啪alije 拧to sam autora upoznala pre no 拧to sam knjigu pro膷itala... No, nadam se da 膰emo se sresti opet... :) #MUST READ!
February 14, 2021
讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 丕賲蹖丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丿乇 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕 賳賵卮鬲賴 倬蹖 蹖乇 賱賵賲鬲乇 貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 亘丕 禺賵丿 丕夭 丿賱 噩賴賳賲 噩賳诏 亘賴 丿賱 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖 亘乇丿 讴賴 亘賴 賲乇丕鬲亘 禺卮賳 鬲乇 貙 亘蹖 乇丨賲 鬲乇 賵 賵丕賯毓蹖 鬲乇 丕夭 丿賳蹖丕蹖 噩賳诏 丕爻鬲 .
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賲賴丕乇鬲 賵 丕爻鬲丕丿蹖 鬲賲丕賲 賴賲 賮囟丕蹖 噩賳诏 丕賵賱 賵 禺賳丿賯 賴丕 賵 亘丕乇丕賳蹖 丕夭 诏賱賵賱賴 乇丕 賲噩爻賲 讴乇丿賴 貙 賴賲 賲丨蹖胤 亘蹖賲丕乇爻鬲丕賳 倬乇 丕夭 賲噩乇賵丨 賵 夭禺賲蹖 賴丕 賵 丿乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 賴賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 毓丕丿蹖 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 亘乇诏卮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 乇丕 貙 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 卮噩丕毓 亘賵丿賳丿 賵 賳賴 賯賴乇賲丕賳 . 丌賳賴丕 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 噩亘賴賴 亘丿賵賳 倬卮鬲蹖亘丕賳蹖 乇賴丕 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇賵夭 賲乇賴 賴賲 鬲賳賴丕 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 禺賵丿卮丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 倬爻 丕蹖賳 賴蹖賵賱丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘乇丌蹖賳丿 貙 賴蹖賵賱丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲丕賳賳丿 賲丕乇蹖 爻賳诏蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 亘賴 賱丨馗賴 亘乇 爻蹖賳賴 賳丕鬲賵丕賳 丌賳賴丕 賮卮丕乇 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿 賵 亘賴 賵賯鬲卮 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 禺賮賴 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿 .
倬蹖 蹖乇 賱賵賲鬲乇 賴賲 噩賳诏 乇丕 賲爻禺乇賴 讴乇丿賴 賵 賴賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿乇 氐賱丨 乇丕 貙 丿乇 噩賳诏 賯賴乇賲丕賳 賯丕鬲賱蹖 賲丕賳賳丿 爻鬲賵丕賳 倬乇丕丿賱 丕爻鬲 賵 丿乇 氐賱丨 賴賲 丕賮爻丕乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 倬賵賱 賵 孬乇賵鬲 丿爻鬲 倬乇丕丿賱 賵 丿蹖诏乇 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 乇賵丕亘胤 讴丕乇 禺賵丿 乇丕 倬蹖卮 賲蹖 亘乇賳丿 . 丕賲丕 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 賲丕賳賳丿 賲賵乇趩賴 賴丕蹖 讴丕乇诏乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 貙 蹖讴蹖 亘丕 蹖讴 丿爻鬲 丌噩乇 丨賲賱 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 丌賳 蹖讴蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 賳丿丕乇丿 毓蹖賳讴 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕 賳賵丕乇 亘賴 爻乇 趩爻亘丕賳丿賴 賵 丿乇亘丕賳 丕爻鬲 貙 噩賳诏 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賴賲賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕蹖賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 乇丕 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 貙 賳賴 鬲賳賴丕 丿乇 倬丕乇蹖爻 貙 丿乇 亘乇賱蹖賳 貙 丿乇 乇購賲 貙 丿乇 賱賳丿賳 貙 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕
賮囟丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 鬲丕乇蹖讴 賵 爻蹖丕賴 丕爻鬲 貙 丕賲丕 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 爻蹖丕賴蹖 丌賳 亘賴 賲乇丕鬲亘 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕爻鬲 貙 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕蹖賳 爻蹖丕賴蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 趩卮賲 賯賴乇賲丕賳丕賳 賲丕 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 賵 丕丿賵丕乇丿 趩卮賲 丿賵禺鬲賴 貙 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳賴丕 賮乇賯蹖 賳賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 趩賴 丿乇 噩賳诏 趩賴 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 夭賳丿賴 亘賴 诏賵乇 卮丿賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 讴爻蹖 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 賳賲蹖 亘蹖賳丿 讴賴 鬲賴 诏賵丿丕賱 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 丕賳丿 貙 禺賵丿卮丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴賳丿 .
賮爻丕丿蹖 讴賴 賱賵賲鬲乇 丕夭 賮乇丕賳爻賴 倬爻 丕夭 噩賳诏 丕賵賱 诏賮鬲賴 亘購賴鬲 丌賵乇 丕爻鬲 貙 賮爻丕丿 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 貙 丿乇 丿賵賱鬲 貙 丿乇 卮賴乇丿丕乇蹖 貙 丿乇 賲賳丕賯氐賴 丕蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丿賮賳 讴乇丿賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 貙 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 貙 丿乇 賴賲賴 丕亘毓丕丿 貙 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 倬卮鬲 鬲蹖乇 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 貙 蹖丕 丿乇 鬲丕亘賵鬲 賴丕蹖 讴賵趩讴鬲乇 亘賴 夭賵乇 趩讴卮 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 噩丕 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 貙 蹖丕 賴賵蹖鬲 丌賳賴丕 丿夭丿蹖丿賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丨鬲蹖 亘賳丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 亘夭乇诏丿丕卮鬲 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 賵胤賳 賴賲 爻丕禺鬲賴 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿 丌賳 賴賲 倬賵卮丕賱蹖 賵 噩毓賱蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 .
丕賲丕 丨丿丕賯賱 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丌賯丕蹖 賱賵賲鬲乇乇賵夭賳賴 丕賲蹖丿蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丌賳 倬蹖乇賲乇丿 賮爻丕丿 賳丕倬匕蹖乇 賲丕賲賵乇 鬲丨賯蹖賯 诏賵乇爻鬲丕賳 賴丕 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丕賵 氐丿丕蹖 诏乇蹖賴 賵 夭丕乇蹖 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 禺賮鬲賴 丿乇 丿賱 禺丕讴 乇丕 賲蹖 卮賳賵丿 貙 丌賳丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘丕 賴賵蹖鬲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 丿賮賳 卮丿賴 丕賳丿 貙 亘丕 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 賵 诏乇丿賳 卮讴爻鬲賴 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 賯丕鬲賱蹖賳 禺賵丿 貙 丕賵 蹖讴 鬲賳賴 亘賴 噩賳诏 爻鬲賵丕賳 倬乇丕丿賱 賮丕爻丿 賲蹖 乇賵丿 .
丿乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 丨賵丕丿孬 卮鬲丕亘 賲蹖 诏蹖乇賳丿 貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 乇丕 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 賲噩丕夭丕鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 丌賳讴賴 夭蹖爻鬲賳 亘丕 夭賵乇 賲購乇賮蹖賳 亘乇丕蹖卮 卮讴賳噩賴 丕蹖 亘賵丿賴 乇丕丨鬲 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丕賲丕 賲乇诏 丕賵 丌乇丕賲卮 乇丕 丕夭 趩卮賲 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖 诏蹖乇丿 賵 丌賳 丿夭丿 卮蹖丕丿 賯丕賱鬲丕賯 丿乇 亘丿賳丕賲蹖 賵 賮賯乇 .
丕賲丕 噩丕賲毓賴 亘賴 賯賴乇賲丕賳 毓丿丕賱鬲 噩賵 亘蹖 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丕爻鬲 貙 丕賵 賴賲 趩賳丕賳 亘丕 賮賯乇 賵 诏賲賳丕賲蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 禺賵丿 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴乇丿賴
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賲賴丕乇鬲 賵 丕爻鬲丕丿蹖 鬲賲丕賲 賴賲 賮囟丕蹖 噩賳诏 丕賵賱 賵 禺賳丿賯 賴丕 賵 亘丕乇丕賳蹖 丕夭 诏賱賵賱賴 乇丕 賲噩爻賲 讴乇丿賴 貙 賴賲 賲丨蹖胤 亘蹖賲丕乇爻鬲丕賳 倬乇 丕夭 賲噩乇賵丨 賵 夭禺賲蹖 賴丕 賵 丿乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 賴賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 毓丕丿蹖 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 亘乇诏卮鬲賴 丕夭 噩賳诏 乇丕 貙 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 賳賴 趩賳丿丕賳 卮噩丕毓 亘賵丿賳丿 賵 賳賴 賯賴乇賲丕賳 . 丌賳賴丕 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丿乇 噩亘賴賴 亘丿賵賳 倬卮鬲蹖亘丕賳蹖 乇賴丕 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇賵夭 賲乇賴 賴賲 鬲賳賴丕 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 禺賵丿卮丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 倬爻 丕蹖賳 賴蹖賵賱丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘乇丌蹖賳丿 貙 賴蹖賵賱丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲丕賳賳丿 賲丕乇蹖 爻賳诏蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 亘賴 賱丨馗賴 亘乇 爻蹖賳賴 賳丕鬲賵丕賳 丌賳賴丕 賮卮丕乇 賲蹖 丌賵乇丿 賵 亘賴 賵賯鬲卮 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 禺賮賴 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿 .
倬蹖 蹖乇 賱賵賲鬲乇 賴賲 噩賳诏 乇丕 賲爻禺乇賴 讴乇丿賴 賵 賴賲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丿乇 氐賱丨 乇丕 貙 丿乇 噩賳诏 賯賴乇賲丕賳 賯丕鬲賱蹖 賲丕賳賳丿 爻鬲賵丕賳 倬乇丕丿賱 丕爻鬲 賵 丿乇 氐賱丨 賴賲 丕賮爻丕乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 倬賵賱 賵 孬乇賵鬲 丿爻鬲 倬乇丕丿賱 賵 丿蹖诏乇 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿丕賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 乇賵丕亘胤 讴丕乇 禺賵丿 乇丕 倬蹖卮 賲蹖 亘乇賳丿 . 丕賲丕 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 賲丕賳賳丿 賲賵乇趩賴 賴丕蹖 讴丕乇诏乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 貙 蹖讴蹖 亘丕 蹖讴 丿爻鬲 丌噩乇 丨賲賱 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 丌賳 蹖讴蹖 讴賴 诏賵卮 賳丿丕乇丿 毓蹖賳讴 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕 賳賵丕乇 亘賴 爻乇 趩爻亘丕賳丿賴 賵 丿乇亘丕賳 丕爻鬲 貙 噩賳诏 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賴賲賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕蹖賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 乇丕 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 貙 賳賴 鬲賳賴丕 丿乇 倬丕乇蹖爻 貙 丿乇 亘乇賱蹖賳 貙 丿乇 乇購賲 貙 丿乇 賱賳丿賳 貙 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕
賮囟丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 鬲丕乇蹖讴 賵 爻蹖丕賴 丕爻鬲 貙 丕賲丕 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 爻蹖丕賴蹖 丌賳 亘賴 賲乇丕鬲亘 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕爻鬲 貙 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕蹖賳 爻蹖丕賴蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 趩卮賲 賯賴乇賲丕賳丕賳 賲丕 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 賵 丕丿賵丕乇丿 趩卮賲 丿賵禺鬲賴 貙 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳賴丕 賮乇賯蹖 賳賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 趩賴 丿乇 噩賳诏 趩賴 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 夭賳丿賴 亘賴 诏賵乇 卮丿賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 貙 讴爻蹖 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 賳賲蹖 亘蹖賳丿 讴賴 鬲賴 诏賵丿丕賱 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 丕賳丿 貙 禺賵丿卮丕賳 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳噩丕鬲 丿賴賳丿 .
賮爻丕丿蹖 讴賴 賱賵賲鬲乇 丕夭 賮乇丕賳爻賴 倬爻 丕夭 噩賳诏 丕賵賱 诏賮鬲賴 亘購賴鬲 丌賵乇 丕爻鬲 貙 賮爻丕丿 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 貙 丿乇 丿賵賱鬲 貙 丿乇 卮賴乇丿丕乇蹖 貙 丿乇 賲賳丕賯氐賴 丕蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丿賮賳 讴乇丿賳 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 貙 丿乇 賴賲賴 噩丕 貙 丿乇 賴賲賴 丕亘毓丕丿 貙 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 倬卮鬲 鬲蹖乇 賲蹖 禺賵乇賳丿 貙 蹖丕 丿乇 鬲丕亘賵鬲 賴丕蹖 讴賵趩讴鬲乇 亘賴 夭賵乇 趩讴卮 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 噩丕 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿 貙 蹖丕 賴賵蹖鬲 丌賳賴丕 丿夭丿蹖丿賴 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丨鬲蹖 亘賳丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 亘夭乇诏丿丕卮鬲 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 賵胤賳 賴賲 爻丕禺鬲賴 禺賵丕賴丿 卮丿 丌賳 賴賲 倬賵卮丕賱蹖 賵 噩毓賱蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 .
丕賲丕 丨丿丕賯賱 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 丌賯丕蹖 賱賵賲鬲乇乇賵夭賳賴 丕賲蹖丿蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丌賳 倬蹖乇賲乇丿 賮爻丕丿 賳丕倬匕蹖乇 賲丕賲賵乇 鬲丨賯蹖賯 诏賵乇爻鬲丕賳 賴丕 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丕賵 氐丿丕蹖 诏乇蹖賴 賵 夭丕乇蹖 爻乇亘丕夭丕賳 禺賮鬲賴 丿乇 丿賱 禺丕讴 乇丕 賲蹖 卮賳賵丿 貙 丌賳丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘丕 賴賵蹖鬲 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 丿賮賳 卮丿賴 丕賳丿 貙 亘丕 丿爻鬲 賵 倬丕 賵 诏乇丿賳 卮讴爻鬲賴 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 賯丕鬲賱蹖賳 禺賵丿 貙 丕賵 蹖讴 鬲賳賴 亘賴 噩賳诏 爻鬲賵丕賳 倬乇丕丿賱 賮丕爻丿 賲蹖 乇賵丿 .
丿乇 倬丕蹖丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 丨賵丕丿孬 卮鬲丕亘 賲蹖 诏蹖乇賳丿 貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 乇丕 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 賲噩丕夭丕鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貙 丌賳讴賴 夭蹖爻鬲賳 亘丕 夭賵乇 賲購乇賮蹖賳 亘乇丕蹖卮 卮讴賳噩賴 丕蹖 亘賵丿賴 乇丕丨鬲 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 丕賲丕 賲乇诏 丕賵 丌乇丕賲卮 乇丕 丕夭 趩卮賲 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖 诏蹖乇丿 賵 丌賳 丿夭丿 卮蹖丕丿 賯丕賱鬲丕賯 丿乇 亘丿賳丕賲蹖 賵 賮賯乇 .
丕賲丕 噩丕賲毓賴 亘賴 賯賴乇賲丕賳 毓丿丕賱鬲 噩賵 亘蹖 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丕爻鬲 貙 丕賵 賴賲 趩賳丕賳 亘丕 賮賯乇 賵 诏賲賳丕賲蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 禺賵丿 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴乇丿賴
Read
November 11, 2018As the hundredth anniversary of armistice day approached, I realised that I'd read only one book about WWI in the last four years in spite of having had the intention in 2014 of reading many. Pierre Lemaitre's book, which begins during the last days of the the war, seemed a fitting way to make reparation for my failed intention.
As it turns out, the one book I did read back in 2014, also by a French author, was set at the beginning of the war so the two novels bookend the period neatly. There are a couple of other things that set them apart too. '14' by Jean Echenoz is written in a consistent and beautiful prose style whereas this book by Pierre Lemaitre is an amalgam of various styles and registers. Echenoz's book is low key and uneventful while Lemaitre's is dramatic and full of action. But the biggest contrast between the two books is in tone. '14' is relentlessly serious while 'Au Revoir L脿-Haut' leans very much towards farce - though it touches on far more serious topics than does '14'.
Both books are concerned with the situation of demobilized soldiers, but where Echenoz remains at a distance from the dilemmas of his characters, Lemaitre gets right up close. One of the main characters is horrifically mutilated and the author doesn't spare the reader any of the details. In fact Lemaitre seems determined to confront aspects of the war and its aftermath that we might prefer not to know about. Right at the beginning of the book, he describes a scene where an officer shoots two of his own scouts, making it seem as if they were shot by the enemy, just to provoke an unnecessary skirmish, sacrificing many more lives in the process. And all of that simply to ensure his own reputation in the final days of the war.
We are just recovering from the fallout from that episode when Lemaitre introduces another bombshell of a theme: how post-war entrepreneurs managed to exploit the grieving population. The war had barely ended when families of dead soldiers began to demand the right to claim their bodies for reburial. Government initiatives were soon put in place to create special cemeteries to which the remains of the hundreds of thousands of soldiers buried in haste near battlefield sites could be transferred. Lemaitre creates a scenario where the person who wins contracts for three of the cemeteries keeps no proper records, and uses cheap undersized coffins and cheap unsupervised labour so that the coffins often contain only partial remains, or are filled with rubble or, worse still, with the bodies of enemy soldiers. The title of this book, which translates as 'See you in Heaven', and which refers to the farewell cry as soldiers ran into battle, begins to sound more like 'See you in Hell'. And those images of war cemeteries I've been seeing on tv news these past few days have taken on a different aspect.
At around the same time that the war cemeteries were being created, there was a big demand for war memorials as every community in France clamored to erect its own tribute to the dead soldiers. Two of Lemaitre's characters exploit this situation by persuading people to take out subscriptions towards monuments which they have no intention of ever delivering. This part of the plot is based on a real-life scam that took place in the 1920s.
That the graveyard opportunists and the monument scam artists are all ex-soldiers is only one of the ironies of this multi-stranded story. One of the opportunists is in fact the officer who sacrificed his men for glory in the beginning of the novel, another, the soldier who was horrifically mutilated in that very same skirmish, and the third, a man who was very nearly counted among the buried himself. But the greatest irony of all is that, although much is made of the fact that the mutilated character can no longer smile or laugh, I smiled and sniggered all the way through these potentially tragic and painful scenarios.
I'm left with the impression that Lemaitre himself is a bit of a scam artist. Instead of the fitting tribute to Armistice day I thought I'd bought, he sold me short with this slick irreverent page-turner of a farce.
Don't you just have to admire a trickster as skillful as that!
As it turns out, the one book I did read back in 2014, also by a French author, was set at the beginning of the war so the two novels bookend the period neatly. There are a couple of other things that set them apart too. '14' by Jean Echenoz is written in a consistent and beautiful prose style whereas this book by Pierre Lemaitre is an amalgam of various styles and registers. Echenoz's book is low key and uneventful while Lemaitre's is dramatic and full of action. But the biggest contrast between the two books is in tone. '14' is relentlessly serious while 'Au Revoir L脿-Haut' leans very much towards farce - though it touches on far more serious topics than does '14'.
Both books are concerned with the situation of demobilized soldiers, but where Echenoz remains at a distance from the dilemmas of his characters, Lemaitre gets right up close. One of the main characters is horrifically mutilated and the author doesn't spare the reader any of the details. In fact Lemaitre seems determined to confront aspects of the war and its aftermath that we might prefer not to know about. Right at the beginning of the book, he describes a scene where an officer shoots two of his own scouts, making it seem as if they were shot by the enemy, just to provoke an unnecessary skirmish, sacrificing many more lives in the process. And all of that simply to ensure his own reputation in the final days of the war.
We are just recovering from the fallout from that episode when Lemaitre introduces another bombshell of a theme: how post-war entrepreneurs managed to exploit the grieving population. The war had barely ended when families of dead soldiers began to demand the right to claim their bodies for reburial. Government initiatives were soon put in place to create special cemeteries to which the remains of the hundreds of thousands of soldiers buried in haste near battlefield sites could be transferred. Lemaitre creates a scenario where the person who wins contracts for three of the cemeteries keeps no proper records, and uses cheap undersized coffins and cheap unsupervised labour so that the coffins often contain only partial remains, or are filled with rubble or, worse still, with the bodies of enemy soldiers. The title of this book, which translates as 'See you in Heaven', and which refers to the farewell cry as soldiers ran into battle, begins to sound more like 'See you in Hell'. And those images of war cemeteries I've been seeing on tv news these past few days have taken on a different aspect.
At around the same time that the war cemeteries were being created, there was a big demand for war memorials as every community in France clamored to erect its own tribute to the dead soldiers. Two of Lemaitre's characters exploit this situation by persuading people to take out subscriptions towards monuments which they have no intention of ever delivering. This part of the plot is based on a real-life scam that took place in the 1920s.
That the graveyard opportunists and the monument scam artists are all ex-soldiers is only one of the ironies of this multi-stranded story. One of the opportunists is in fact the officer who sacrificed his men for glory in the beginning of the novel, another, the soldier who was horrifically mutilated in that very same skirmish, and the third, a man who was very nearly counted among the buried himself. But the greatest irony of all is that, although much is made of the fact that the mutilated character can no longer smile or laugh, I smiled and sniggered all the way through these potentially tragic and painful scenarios.
I'm left with the impression that Lemaitre himself is a bit of a scam artist. Instead of the fitting tribute to Armistice day I thought I'd bought, he sold me short with this slick irreverent page-turner of a farce.
Don't you just have to admire a trickster as skillful as that!
February 3, 2021
3/5
鈥淗asta las mayores alegr铆as dejan un poso de tristeza. En toda experiencia hay siempre un sentimiento de carencia鈥�.
Ten铆a ganas de leer esta novela, puesto que ya hab铆a le铆do a Lemaitre en 鈥淩ecursos inhumanos鈥� y, pese a que su prosa me pareci贸 sombr铆a, me gust贸 mucho su habilidad para los giros y las sorpresas. En este caso, la afront茅 a trav茅s de una lectura conjunta.
Sin embargo, tras un arranque muy intenso, la novela se va diluyendo paulatinamente hasta un final anodino y algo aburrido, donde esperaba bastante m谩s y alguno de esos giros de los que hablaba.
Estructurada en tres cap铆tulos, que corresponden a los a帽os 1918 a 1920, coincidiendo con el final de la Primera Guerra Mundial, narra las andanzas entrelazadas de tres participantes en ella: dos soldados, uno de ellos con una mutilaci贸n seria, y un oficial. Como ya dije, el primer cap铆tulo es el mejor, mientras en los otros dos asistimos al desarrollo y el desenlace de dos fraudes monumentales, al parecer uno real y otro no. Una cita particularmente divertida es esta:
鈥�... era un imb茅cil esf茅rico: lo volvieras hacia donde lo volvieras se mostraba igual de idiota鈥�.
Con todo, la novela me parece interesante, aunque no resulte muy adictiva.
鈥淗asta las mayores alegr铆as dejan un poso de tristeza. En toda experiencia hay siempre un sentimiento de carencia鈥�.
Ten铆a ganas de leer esta novela, puesto que ya hab铆a le铆do a Lemaitre en 鈥淩ecursos inhumanos鈥� y, pese a que su prosa me pareci贸 sombr铆a, me gust贸 mucho su habilidad para los giros y las sorpresas. En este caso, la afront茅 a trav茅s de una lectura conjunta.
Sin embargo, tras un arranque muy intenso, la novela se va diluyendo paulatinamente hasta un final anodino y algo aburrido, donde esperaba bastante m谩s y alguno de esos giros de los que hablaba.
Estructurada en tres cap铆tulos, que corresponden a los a帽os 1918 a 1920, coincidiendo con el final de la Primera Guerra Mundial, narra las andanzas entrelazadas de tres participantes en ella: dos soldados, uno de ellos con una mutilaci贸n seria, y un oficial. Como ya dije, el primer cap铆tulo es el mejor, mientras en los otros dos asistimos al desarrollo y el desenlace de dos fraudes monumentales, al parecer uno real y otro no. Una cita particularmente divertida es esta:
鈥�... era un imb茅cil esf茅rico: lo volvieras hacia donde lo volvieras se mostraba igual de idiota鈥�.
Con todo, la novela me parece interesante, aunque no resulte muy adictiva.
April 23, 2014
J'ai pris un tel plaisir de lecture au dernier prix Goncourt que j'arrache les yeux 脿 celui qui vendra me dire que les prix litt茅raires, c'est du chiqu茅.
Pierre Lema卯tre, auteur 脿 succ猫s de romans policiers plaisamment trouss茅s, s'attaque avec talent 脿 un nouveau genre : le roman historique tendance S茅bastien Japrisot "Un long dimanche de fian莽ailles" ou Marc Dugain "La chambre des officiers".
L'a-t-il fait avec un poil(u?) d'opportunisme 脿 la veille d'une ann茅e riche en comm茅morations ? Accordons lui le b茅n茅fice du doute tant le r茅sultat est r茅ussi.
Vous ouvrirez ce gros livre de 500 pages et serez aussit么t happ茅 par la sc猫ne d'ouverture 脿 couper le souffle. Nous sommes dans les tranch茅es, en novembre 1918. Les trois h茅ros du roman s'y retrouvent - pour ne plus jamais se recroiser : Albert Maillard, un pauvre bougre qui manque mourir 茅touff茅 dans un trou d'obus nez-脿-nez avec un cadavre de cheval, le lieutenant d'Aulnay Pradelle, fringant officier pr锚t 脿 tout pour restaurer son blason et le jeune Edouard P茅ricourt, dessinateur de g茅nie, mais en rupture de ban avec sa richissime famille.
Pierre Lema卯tre a le chic pour croquer des personnages attachants (ah ! Joseph Merlin et ses godillots) plong茅s dans des situations saisissantes.
De la premi猫re 脿 la derni猫re sc猫ne, son roman est 茅minemment cin茅matographique et je ne doute pas un seul instant qu'il soit rapidement adapt茅 脿 l'茅cran.
Je me suis amus茅 脿 dresser un casting imaginaire.
Dans le r么le d'Albert, le bon bougre, g茅n茅reux 脿 d茅faut d'锚tre courageux, Clovis CORNILLAC ou Gr茅gory GADEBOIS.
Louis GARREL ferait un tr猫s bon Edouard, romantique, tourment茅, potache et ambigu.
J'ai beaucoup h茅sit茅 pour Henry. Il faudrait un m茅chant d'anthologie, dot茅 d'une force physique mena莽ante. Samuel LABARTHE ?
Le p猫re d'Edouard doit en imposer par son autorit茅 naturelle. Philippe NOIRET aurait 茅t茅 parfait. Jean-Pierre MARIELLE est peut-锚tre un poil trop vieux. Philippe TORRETON un poil trop jeune
On ne devrait pas avoir de mal 脿 trouver une actrice pour Madeleine, la s艙ur aimante d'Edouard : Emmanuelle DEVOS ? Sandrine KIBERLAIN ?
Pour les personnages secondaires j'ai pens茅 脿 la charmante Charlotte LE BON pour pauline, la jolie domestique, et Thierry FREMONT pour Joseph MERLIN le monstrueux inspecteur des cimeti猫res.
D'autres id茅es ?
Pierre Lema卯tre, auteur 脿 succ猫s de romans policiers plaisamment trouss茅s, s'attaque avec talent 脿 un nouveau genre : le roman historique tendance S茅bastien Japrisot "Un long dimanche de fian莽ailles" ou Marc Dugain "La chambre des officiers".
L'a-t-il fait avec un poil(u?) d'opportunisme 脿 la veille d'une ann茅e riche en comm茅morations ? Accordons lui le b茅n茅fice du doute tant le r茅sultat est r茅ussi.
Vous ouvrirez ce gros livre de 500 pages et serez aussit么t happ茅 par la sc猫ne d'ouverture 脿 couper le souffle. Nous sommes dans les tranch茅es, en novembre 1918. Les trois h茅ros du roman s'y retrouvent - pour ne plus jamais se recroiser : Albert Maillard, un pauvre bougre qui manque mourir 茅touff茅 dans un trou d'obus nez-脿-nez avec un cadavre de cheval, le lieutenant d'Aulnay Pradelle, fringant officier pr锚t 脿 tout pour restaurer son blason et le jeune Edouard P茅ricourt, dessinateur de g茅nie, mais en rupture de ban avec sa richissime famille.
Pierre Lema卯tre a le chic pour croquer des personnages attachants (ah ! Joseph Merlin et ses godillots) plong茅s dans des situations saisissantes.
De la premi猫re 脿 la derni猫re sc猫ne, son roman est 茅minemment cin茅matographique et je ne doute pas un seul instant qu'il soit rapidement adapt茅 脿 l'茅cran.
Je me suis amus茅 脿 dresser un casting imaginaire.
Dans le r么le d'Albert, le bon bougre, g茅n茅reux 脿 d茅faut d'锚tre courageux, Clovis CORNILLAC ou Gr茅gory GADEBOIS.
Louis GARREL ferait un tr猫s bon Edouard, romantique, tourment茅, potache et ambigu.
J'ai beaucoup h茅sit茅 pour Henry. Il faudrait un m茅chant d'anthologie, dot茅 d'une force physique mena莽ante. Samuel LABARTHE ?
Le p猫re d'Edouard doit en imposer par son autorit茅 naturelle. Philippe NOIRET aurait 茅t茅 parfait. Jean-Pierre MARIELLE est peut-锚tre un poil trop vieux. Philippe TORRETON un poil trop jeune
On ne devrait pas avoir de mal 脿 trouver une actrice pour Madeleine, la s艙ur aimante d'Edouard : Emmanuelle DEVOS ? Sandrine KIBERLAIN ?
Pour les personnages secondaires j'ai pens茅 脿 la charmante Charlotte LE BON pour pauline, la jolie domestique, et Thierry FREMONT pour Joseph MERLIN le monstrueux inspecteur des cimeti猫res.
D'autres id茅es ?
Read
February 5, 2019螕谓蠋蟻喂蟽伪 蟿慰谓 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 纬谓蠅蟽蟿萎 蟽蔚喂蟻维 伪蟽蟿蠀谓慰渭喂魏蠋谓, 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 渭慰蠀 维蠁畏蟽伪谓 蟺慰位蠉 胃蔚蟿喂魏苇蟼 蔚谓蟿蠀蟺蠋蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蔚委蠂伪 蟿畏谓 蟺蔚蟻喂苇蟻纬蔚喂伪 谓伪 未蠅 蟺蠅蟼 蟿伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻谓蔚喂 蟽蔚 维位位伪 蔚委未畏.
螒蟺慰未蔚委蠂蟿畏魏蔚 苇谓伪 蔚尉伪喂蟻蔚蟿喂魏蠈 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽渭伪 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚 维蠁畏蟽蔚 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿伪 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓慰 魏伪喂 伪蟺慰未蔚喂魏谓蠉蔚喂 蟿畏 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁喂魏萎 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 . 螚 蔚蟺慰蠂萎 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏 位萎尉畏 蟿慰蠀 螒' 螤螤 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺蠈 渭蠈谓畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰位蠉 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀蟽伪 魏伪喂 慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 伪尉喂慰蟺慰喂蠋谓蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏维 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委伪 蠂蟿委味蔚喂 渭喂伪 渭蠀胃慰蟺位伪蟽委伪 蟺慰蠀 魏蟻伪蟿维 蠄畏位维 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 蟿慰蠀 伪谓伪纬谓蠋蟽蟿畏.
韦慰 蟽畏渭蔚委慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚蟺喂渭苇谓蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 慰喂 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 慰蟺慰委慰蠀蟼 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻蔚委 谓伪 渭伪蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿萎蟽蔚喂 慰喂魏蔚委慰蠀蟼 渭苇蟽伪 蠈蠂喂 渭蠈谓慰 伪蟺蠈 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻维尉蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏苇蟼 伪谓伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 蟽蟿慰 蟺伪蟻蔚位胃蠈谓 蟿慰蠀蟼. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 蟺蔚蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪位维 魏伪胃蠋蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蠋 谓伪 蟺蠅 蠈蟿喂 "苇谓喂蠅蟽伪" 蟿伪 魏委谓畏蟿蟻伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 畏蟻蠋蠅谓 蟿慰蠀. 螤伪蟻维位位畏位伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻谓蔚喂 谓伪 渭伪蟼 未蠋蟽蔚喂 蟿慰 魏位委渭伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪委蟽胃畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟺慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪蟼, 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 苇蟺伪喂尉伪谓 魏伪胃慰蟻喂蟽蟿喂魏蠈 蟻蠈位慰 蟽蟿喂蟼 渭蔚蟿苇蟺蔚喂蟿伪 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏苇蟼 蔚尉蔚位委尉蔚喂蟼.
螠慰谓伪未喂魏蠈 蟽畏渭蔚委慰 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰尾位畏渭维蟿喂蟽蔚 位委纬慰 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蟽蠂蔚蟿喂魏萎 "蠁位蠀伪蟻委伪" 喂未委蠅蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎, 蠈蟺慰蠀 慰 伪谓伪纬谓蠋蟽蟿畏蟼 蟺喂胃伪谓蠋蟼 魏慰蠀蟻伪蟽蟿蔚委 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏慰蠉蟼 渭慰谓慰位蠈纬慰蠀蟼, 蠈渭蠅蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈 尉蔚蟺蔚蟻谓喂苇蟿伪喂 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻伪 魏伪喂 畏 蟺位慰魏萎 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 谓伪 魏喂谓蔚委 蟿伪 谓萎渭伪蟿伪 魏伪喂 魏伪胃蠋蟼 蟺蟻慰蠂蠅蟻维蔚喂 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 畏 伪蠁萎纬畏蟽畏 纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟺喂慰 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻畏.
韦慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 喂蟽慰蟻蟻慰蟺畏渭苇谓慰 魏伪胃蠋蟼 慰 魏伪胃苇谓伪蟼 魏伪蟿伪位萎纬蔚喂 蠈蟺蠅蟼 "蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂" 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏维 渭蔚 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰委畏蟽蔚 蟺慰位蠉. 螡慰渭委味蠅 蠈蟿喂 伪尉委味蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰 未喂伪尾维蟽蔚蟿蔚!
螒蟺慰未蔚委蠂蟿畏魏蔚 苇谓伪 蔚尉伪喂蟻蔚蟿喂魏蠈 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽渭伪 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚 维蠁畏蟽蔚 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿伪 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓慰 魏伪喂 伪蟺慰未蔚喂魏谓蠉蔚喂 蟿畏 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁喂魏萎 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 . 螚 蔚蟺慰蠂萎 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏 位萎尉畏 蟿慰蠀 螒' 螤螤 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺蠈 渭蠈谓畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰位蠉 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀蟽伪 魏伪喂 慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 伪尉喂慰蟺慰喂蠋谓蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏维 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委伪 蠂蟿委味蔚喂 渭喂伪 渭蠀胃慰蟺位伪蟽委伪 蟺慰蠀 魏蟻伪蟿维 蠄畏位维 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 蟿慰蠀 伪谓伪纬谓蠋蟽蟿畏.
韦慰 蟽畏渭蔚委慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚蟺喂渭苇谓蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 慰喂 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 慰蟺慰委慰蠀蟼 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻蔚委 谓伪 渭伪蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿萎蟽蔚喂 慰喂魏蔚委慰蠀蟼 渭苇蟽伪 蠈蠂喂 渭蠈谓慰 伪蟺蠈 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻维尉蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏苇蟼 伪谓伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 蟽蟿慰 蟺伪蟻蔚位胃蠈谓 蟿慰蠀蟼. 螒蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 蟺蔚蟿蠀蠂伪委谓蔚喂 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪位维 魏伪胃蠋蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蠋 谓伪 蟺蠅 蠈蟿喂 "苇谓喂蠅蟽伪" 蟿伪 魏委谓畏蟿蟻伪 魏伪喂 蟿慰谓 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 畏蟻蠋蠅谓 蟿慰蠀. 螤伪蟻维位位畏位伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻谓蔚喂 谓伪 渭伪蟼 未蠋蟽蔚喂 蟿慰 魏位委渭伪 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪委蟽胃畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟺慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪蟼, 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 苇蟺伪喂尉伪谓 魏伪胃慰蟻喂蟽蟿喂魏蠈 蟻蠈位慰 蟽蟿喂蟼 渭蔚蟿苇蟺蔚喂蟿伪 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏苇蟼 蔚尉蔚位委尉蔚喂蟼.
螠慰谓伪未喂魏蠈 蟽畏渭蔚委慰 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚 蟺蟻慰尾位畏渭维蟿喂蟽蔚 位委纬慰 蔚委谓伪喂 渭喂伪 蟽蠂蔚蟿喂魏萎 "蠁位蠀伪蟻委伪" 喂未委蠅蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎, 蠈蟺慰蠀 慰 伪谓伪纬谓蠋蟽蟿畏蟼 蟺喂胃伪谓蠋蟼 魏慰蠀蟻伪蟽蟿蔚委 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏慰蠉蟼 渭慰谓慰位蠈纬慰蠀蟼, 蠈渭蠅蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈 尉蔚蟺蔚蟻谓喂苇蟿伪喂 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻伪 魏伪喂 畏 蟺位慰魏萎 伪蟻蠂委味蔚喂 谓伪 魏喂谓蔚委 蟿伪 谓萎渭伪蟿伪 魏伪喂 魏伪胃蠋蟼 蟺蟻慰蠂蠅蟻维蔚喂 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 畏 伪蠁萎纬畏蟽畏 纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟺喂慰 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻畏.
韦慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 喂蟽慰蟻蟻慰蟺畏渭苇谓慰 魏伪胃蠋蟼 慰 魏伪胃苇谓伪蟼 魏伪蟿伪位萎纬蔚喂 蠈蟺蠅蟼 "蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂" 魏伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏维 渭蔚 喂魏伪谓慰蟺慰委畏蟽蔚 蟺慰位蠉. 螡慰渭委味蠅 蠈蟿喂 伪尉委味蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰 未喂伪尾维蟽蔚蟿蔚!
April 13, 2018
螘谓伪 尾喂尾位委慰 伪谓蟿维尉喂慰 蟿蠅谓 蟿蠈蟽慰 魏伪位蠋谓 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏蠋谓. 螒蟺慰位伪蠀蟽蟿喂魏萎 纬蟻伪蠁萎 渭蔚 萎蟻蠅蔚蟼 蟺慰蠀 未慰魏喂渭维蟽蟿畏魏伪谓 蟽魏位畏蟻维 蟽蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 螒蝿 螤伪纬魏慰蟽渭委慰蠀 螤慰位苇渭慰蠀. 螒蟺蟻蠈尾位蔚蟺蟿畏 蔚尉苇位喂尉畏 渭蔚 苇谓伪 蟿蟻伪纬喂魏蠈 蟿苇位慰蟼... 螒蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟿慰 蠈蠂喂 渭蠈谓慰 纬喂伪 未喂维尾伪蟽渭伪 伪位位维 魏伪喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 尾喂尾位喂慰胃萎魏畏 蟿慰蠀 魏伪胃蔚谓蠈蟼. 韦慰 渭蠈谓慰 伪蟻谓畏蟿喂魏蠈. 螣 蔚魏未慰蟿喂魏蠈蟼 慰委魏慰蟼 未蔚谓 蟽蔚尾维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蟿慰 蔚尉蠋蠁蠀位位慰 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻蠋蟿畏蟼 苇魏未慰蟽畏蟼 渭蔚 伪蟺慰蟿苇位蔚蟽渭伪 畏 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓畏 苇魏未慰蟽畏 谓伪 慰渭伪未慰蟺慰喂畏胃蔚委 蠅蟼 蔚渭蠁维谓喂蟽畏 渭蔚 维位位蔚蟼 蔚魏未蠈蟽蔚喂蟼 维位位蠅谓 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇蠅谓.
June 7, 2021
亘丕 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 亘丕賵乇賳讴乇丿賳蹖!
November 2, 2015
This novel takes place over three years: 1918, 1919 and 1920. As befitting a book which deals with the aftermath of WWI, this begins in the trenches. War is almost over and the soldiers of the 163rd Infantry Division are, frankly, not keen to take part in a proposed offensive to cross the Meuse. For Lieutenant d鈥橝ulnay Pradelle though, who fears peace will come before he achieves the glory he yearns for, it is one last chance to use the war for his own ends 鈥� and nothing is going to stop him鈥�
When two French soldiers are shot on a reconnaissance mission, the men are outraged at the enemy. The outrage spills into an escalation of violence and, two days before the end of the war, Pradelle gets his offensive. When soldier, Albert Maillard comes across the bodies of the two soldiers though, he suspects all is not what it seems and Pradelle notices his interest ... On the battlefield, it seems as though Albert will not gain his wish to return home, but his life is saved by Edouard Pericourt, a talented artist from a wealthy family. Despite the fact that both men survive, this event has massive repercussions for both of them.
I have read many books about the first world war, but not many about the immediate aftermath of war and I actually cannot recall reading one set in France. This perfectly captures the deep distress of a society attempting to cope after this momentous event; of how so many returning servicemen were viewed and of how they struggled to pick up the pieces of their lives. Unwilling to return home, Edouard becomes Albert鈥檚 responsibility. He is so damaged that Albert states that leaving the hospital with him was, 鈥渓ike walking a wild animal from the zoo down the street,鈥� but, in reality, both men are deeply changed; whether physically or mentally.
Both Albert and Edouard struggle with poverty, and, in Edouard鈥檚 case, dependency on painkillers. Before the war, Albert had a job and a girlfriend, but now he finds that, although he has left the trenches, he is unable to find his way back to normality. What is worse, Pradelle 鈥� who Albert fears 鈥� has become a success and his social climbing is combined with financial gain, through some rather unscrupulous mean. That is, until Edouard comes up with a plan that has the capacity to become an impending national scandal.
I have not read the crime novels by this extremely talented author, but I really enjoyed this book , which is populated by a great cast of characters. Not just the slightly sinister Pradelle, the weary, gentle kindness of Albert and the artistic and personal flamboyance of Edouard, cruelly destroyed by a single moment; but of the others that help flesh out the storyline. The daughter of the landlady, who befriends the two men, the pretty maid Pauline, Edouard鈥檚 father, his sister Madeleine and the government inspector, Joseph Merlin, all add to the evocation of this time. The plot is intricate, involved and will carry you along until the end. A very enjoyable book, which will have a lot to offer reading groups, as it has so much to discuss, as well as being a very interesting personal read.
When two French soldiers are shot on a reconnaissance mission, the men are outraged at the enemy. The outrage spills into an escalation of violence and, two days before the end of the war, Pradelle gets his offensive. When soldier, Albert Maillard comes across the bodies of the two soldiers though, he suspects all is not what it seems and Pradelle notices his interest ... On the battlefield, it seems as though Albert will not gain his wish to return home, but his life is saved by Edouard Pericourt, a talented artist from a wealthy family. Despite the fact that both men survive, this event has massive repercussions for both of them.
I have read many books about the first world war, but not many about the immediate aftermath of war and I actually cannot recall reading one set in France. This perfectly captures the deep distress of a society attempting to cope after this momentous event; of how so many returning servicemen were viewed and of how they struggled to pick up the pieces of their lives. Unwilling to return home, Edouard becomes Albert鈥檚 responsibility. He is so damaged that Albert states that leaving the hospital with him was, 鈥渓ike walking a wild animal from the zoo down the street,鈥� but, in reality, both men are deeply changed; whether physically or mentally.
Both Albert and Edouard struggle with poverty, and, in Edouard鈥檚 case, dependency on painkillers. Before the war, Albert had a job and a girlfriend, but now he finds that, although he has left the trenches, he is unable to find his way back to normality. What is worse, Pradelle 鈥� who Albert fears 鈥� has become a success and his social climbing is combined with financial gain, through some rather unscrupulous mean. That is, until Edouard comes up with a plan that has the capacity to become an impending national scandal.
I have not read the crime novels by this extremely talented author, but I really enjoyed this book , which is populated by a great cast of characters. Not just the slightly sinister Pradelle, the weary, gentle kindness of Albert and the artistic and personal flamboyance of Edouard, cruelly destroyed by a single moment; but of the others that help flesh out the storyline. The daughter of the landlady, who befriends the two men, the pretty maid Pauline, Edouard鈥檚 father, his sister Madeleine and the government inspector, Joseph Merlin, all add to the evocation of this time. The plot is intricate, involved and will carry you along until the end. A very enjoyable book, which will have a lot to offer reading groups, as it has so much to discuss, as well as being a very interesting personal read.
April 11, 2020
He disfrutado mucho del libro, pero se me cae una estrella por culpa del final. La mente me ped铆a algo que no sucedi贸鈥� De todos modos, me pesa mucho m谩s lo bueno: la trama, la narrativa, los personajes potentes y la reflexi贸n sobre las secuelas de la guerra.
En fin, que repetir茅 con Lemaitre aunque esta vez leer茅 alguno de sus thrillers (Alex, Vestido de novia, Irene鈥�), que intuyo se adaptar谩 a mis gustos literarios como si de una segunda piel se tratara.
En fin, que repetir茅 con Lemaitre aunque esta vez leer茅 alguno de sus thrillers (Alex, Vestido de novia, Irene鈥�), que intuyo se adaptar谩 a mis gustos literarios como si de una segunda piel se tratara.
April 10, 2021
Like all war or post-war novels, this one describes soldiers who were briefly called heroes and then were left to live in poverty and despair. But there is more than this thread in the story. It's also a story about failed relationships between a son and a father, betrayal of loved ones, friendship, greediness, corruption, secrets, pain, lost serenity... The novel is tragic and comic at the same time, where protagonists meet the end that had been written long since...
But he feels so tired. Exhaustion has finally overtaken him. Because this is all so stupid. It is as though he has just set down his suitcase, as though he has arrived. He could not climb the slope even if he wanted. He was within a hair鈥檚 breadth of surviving the war, and now here he is at the bottom of a shell crater. He slumps rather than sits and takes his head in his hands. He tries to assess the situation, but his confidence has suddenly melted away. Like an ice cream.
*
He looks like he is sleeping. 脡douard recognizes him鈥攚hat was his name again? He is dead. The realization is so devastating that 脡douard P茅ricourt stops and stares down at his fallen comrade, and in that moment, he feels as though he, too, is dead, that what he is contemplating is his own death, and the pain of it is vast, overwhelming . . .
*
For several months, since he was first wounded at the Somme, since the interminable nights spent working as a stretcher bearer, scuttling around, terrified of being hit by a stray bullet, looking for wounded men on the battlefield, and even more since he had returned from among the dead, he knew that he would forever be inhabited by an indefinable, pulsing, almost palpable fear. This had been made worse by the devastating effects of having been buried alive. Some part of him was still buried in the earth, his body had emerged, but some captive, terrified part of his brain had remained trapped below.
*
His thoughts now were frozen images, distant and yet tenuously connected to him. There was no place for anger or for hope.
脡douard was profoundly depressed.
*
He made valiant efforts, he clenched his fists and vainly tried to picture the future, but it leached away through the tiniest of cracks, leaving him brooding about his past, which surged past like a river, a torrent of images with neither rhyme nor reason.
*
What you see is not exactly reality, your thoughts are ever shifting, your plans are like illusions, you live in a dream, in a story that is never quite your own.
And there is no tomorrow.
*
He had to face the facts: though inexplicable, it was not a misfortune, it was a tragedy. The end鈥攚hether this or another鈥攈ad to come because it had been written long since.
But he feels so tired. Exhaustion has finally overtaken him. Because this is all so stupid. It is as though he has just set down his suitcase, as though he has arrived. He could not climb the slope even if he wanted. He was within a hair鈥檚 breadth of surviving the war, and now here he is at the bottom of a shell crater. He slumps rather than sits and takes his head in his hands. He tries to assess the situation, but his confidence has suddenly melted away. Like an ice cream.
*
He looks like he is sleeping. 脡douard recognizes him鈥攚hat was his name again? He is dead. The realization is so devastating that 脡douard P茅ricourt stops and stares down at his fallen comrade, and in that moment, he feels as though he, too, is dead, that what he is contemplating is his own death, and the pain of it is vast, overwhelming . . .
*
For several months, since he was first wounded at the Somme, since the interminable nights spent working as a stretcher bearer, scuttling around, terrified of being hit by a stray bullet, looking for wounded men on the battlefield, and even more since he had returned from among the dead, he knew that he would forever be inhabited by an indefinable, pulsing, almost palpable fear. This had been made worse by the devastating effects of having been buried alive. Some part of him was still buried in the earth, his body had emerged, but some captive, terrified part of his brain had remained trapped below.
*
His thoughts now were frozen images, distant and yet tenuously connected to him. There was no place for anger or for hope.
脡douard was profoundly depressed.
*
He made valiant efforts, he clenched his fists and vainly tried to picture the future, but it leached away through the tiniest of cracks, leaving him brooding about his past, which surged past like a river, a torrent of images with neither rhyme nor reason.
*
What you see is not exactly reality, your thoughts are ever shifting, your plans are like illusions, you live in a dream, in a story that is never quite your own.
And there is no tomorrow.
*
He had to face the facts: though inexplicable, it was not a misfortune, it was a tragedy. The end鈥攚hether this or another鈥攈ad to come because it had been written long since.
January 22, 2020
El Premio Goncourt del 2013, Nos Vemos all谩 arriba de Pierre Lemaitre (1951-) nos muestra con gran precisi贸n las miserias humanas provocadas por la guerra en la 茅poca inmediatamente posterior a la Primera Guerra Mundial.
Estamos ante una novela dura, plagada de desesperanza, pero por la que discurren tambi茅n valores como la ternura, la amistad o la compasi贸n e, incluso, ciertas dosis de iron铆a. No encuentro h茅roes, la verdad, tan solo supervivientes en un mundo absurdo, con grandes diferencias de clase y est煤pidas normas sociales.
Su prosa es indiscutible y sus personajes, te gusten o no, te desesperen o no, est谩n magistralmente trazados. Quiz谩 no todas sus diversas tramas resulten igual de interesantes, pero mantienen la calidad suficiente para disfrutarlas. Otro punto a su favor es la 茅poca en la que se desarrolla. Creo que hay mucha literatura sobre la Segunda Guerra Mundial y menos sobre la Primera o, al menos, yo no hab铆a le铆do demasiado. Por este motivo, la descripci贸n de la vida cotidiana en el Par铆s de 1918 me ha resultado enriquecedor.
Creo que mi opini贸n general es obvia: excelente literatura. (Manu)
Estamos ante una novela dura, plagada de desesperanza, pero por la que discurren tambi茅n valores como la ternura, la amistad o la compasi贸n e, incluso, ciertas dosis de iron铆a. No encuentro h茅roes, la verdad, tan solo supervivientes en un mundo absurdo, con grandes diferencias de clase y est煤pidas normas sociales.
Su prosa es indiscutible y sus personajes, te gusten o no, te desesperen o no, est谩n magistralmente trazados. Quiz谩 no todas sus diversas tramas resulten igual de interesantes, pero mantienen la calidad suficiente para disfrutarlas. Otro punto a su favor es la 茅poca en la que se desarrolla. Creo que hay mucha literatura sobre la Segunda Guerra Mundial y menos sobre la Primera o, al menos, yo no hab铆a le铆do demasiado. Por este motivo, la descripci贸n de la vida cotidiana en el Par铆s de 1918 me ha resultado enriquecedor.
Creo que mi opini贸n general es obvia: excelente literatura. (Manu)
July 5, 2018
听
To their graves again
The set-up is simple. Two French soldiers, Albert Maillard and 脡douard P茅ricourt, both wounded in a pointless operation a few days before the Armistice of November 11, 1918, save each other's lives. Albert is buried alive; 脡douard digs him out in the nick of time, but is himself wounded. Their recovery is hindered by Lieutenant Henri d'Aulnay-Pradelle, who sets up the attack to seize his last chance at promotion, killing some of his own men to further his own heroic legend; he is a made-for-the-movies villain, handsome, ubiquitous, and utterly detestable.
After 150 pages, the action moves forward by a year. Albert is scraping a living while trying to look after 脡douard, who feels he is too disfigured to return to his rich family, and is living under a false name. D'Aulnay-Pradelle meanwhile, has married into 脡douard's family, and is using his connections to rise rapidly in society. He becomes a postwar profiteer, contracting with the government to disinter the bodies of soldiers from their battlefield graves and rebury them in large official cemeteries. But he is greedy, and cuts corners. Albert and 脡douard, meanwhile, start their own scheme to raise money for war memorials, based on 脡douard's extraordinary abilities as an artist. The author cites several articles suggesting that something of this kind was an actual scandal in the years following the War. Certainly, he has a remarkable knowledge of French bureaucracy, and a perfect ear for how the rich use their status to manipulate those less powerful.
I am in awe at Lemaitre's skill at plotting. Starting from just these three major characters, he gradually introduces others鈥斆塪ouard's sister and father, Pradelle's fellow directors, a tenacious inspector from the Ministry, the landlady's daughter who becomes fascinated with 脡douard, and the beautiful maid who falls for Albert鈥攚orking them into the remainder of the novel as integral parts of the action. He has a way of presenting plot twists as faits accomplis, and only then going back to explain how they came about. He is brilliant at building a climax.
Morally, the book is more challenging. I found myself liking quite a few of the characters, but approving of none of them. The attractive ones include the meek yet resourceful Albert, 脡douard's sister, and even his banker father, cold though he seemed at the beginning. But none of the characters are without bad traits, and even our heroes engage in deceptive, if not downright criminal, behavior. The back cover calls the novel a "fresco of a rare cruelty," and there is certainly a quality of violence to the writing, that almost revels in injury, insult, and degradation (not to mention decomposing bodies) as though this were a 19th-century melodrama seen through the lens of an R-rated film-maker.
Hence, I think, my difficulty in finding a context within which to rate this. Its subject is early 20th-century, and Lemaitre mentions a couple of novels from the period that influenced him. But for me, the overriding sensation was of reading a novel from the 19th century. The obvious comparison is with Balzac's , also about a soldier buried alive who finds it difficult to return to civil life. But in scope, it is more like Stendhal, or Zola, or most of all Hugo's ; Lemaitre at one point even compares Pradelle to Javert. In any case, the kind of novel they don't write any more鈥攐r write, if they do, to sell in airports rather than enter for prizes. And yet I was always conscious of this being a 21st-century product, for its attitudes, its authorial voice, and not least for its language that kept me going to the online dictionary, looking up presumably slang words that as often or not I could not find. I feel I cannot possibly give it less than five stars, but part of me wonders how much of this is due to the undertaking of reading it in French. When it becomes a best-seller in English, will it seem then merely another blockbuster historical novel, or truly a prizewinner, something exceptional? We shall see.
======
After corresponding with a couple of Francophone friends, I would add the following. Much of my difficulty with context probably stems from the fact that the book is written simultaneously in two registers, the literary and the popular, which often jostle one another within the bounds of a single sentence. It is a kind of sampling technique that could really only be done in the postmodern era, even though the story goes back a century, and the idea of the grand novel a century before that. Secondly, it is a book that changes its colors as it progresses. The opening 150 pages have a philosophical depth, psychological perception, and richness of style which does not at all conflict with the Prix Goncourt world. But as it becomes increasingly more of a plot-driven novel, it also becomes more commercial鈥攖hough doubtless highly successful in that genre.
To their graves again
Those who thought that this war would be over quickly are all dead. Of the war, of course.Early November, 1918; what a marvelous opening! This massive novel, winner of the Prix Goncourt for 2013, has all the makings of a popular success. Something of a 蝉耻肠猫蝉-诲别-蝉肠补苍诲补濒别 in France, where it challenges the national preoccupation with patriotic valor, and paints a vitriolic portrait of virtually the entire establishment. But it is also a mighty good story by any account, that starts in the trenches of WW1 and changes into a fascinating tale of crime and corruption, with a nail-biting finish. It will surely be a best-seller in translation, and I can already imagine the Hollywood movie or BBC miniseries. However, I find it hard to gauge its literary value; it is a very different animal from the works of previous Goncourt winners such as Michel Houellebecq, Marie N'Diaye, or Jean Echenoz.
The set-up is simple. Two French soldiers, Albert Maillard and 脡douard P茅ricourt, both wounded in a pointless operation a few days before the Armistice of November 11, 1918, save each other's lives. Albert is buried alive; 脡douard digs him out in the nick of time, but is himself wounded. Their recovery is hindered by Lieutenant Henri d'Aulnay-Pradelle, who sets up the attack to seize his last chance at promotion, killing some of his own men to further his own heroic legend; he is a made-for-the-movies villain, handsome, ubiquitous, and utterly detestable.
After 150 pages, the action moves forward by a year. Albert is scraping a living while trying to look after 脡douard, who feels he is too disfigured to return to his rich family, and is living under a false name. D'Aulnay-Pradelle meanwhile, has married into 脡douard's family, and is using his connections to rise rapidly in society. He becomes a postwar profiteer, contracting with the government to disinter the bodies of soldiers from their battlefield graves and rebury them in large official cemeteries. But he is greedy, and cuts corners. Albert and 脡douard, meanwhile, start their own scheme to raise money for war memorials, based on 脡douard's extraordinary abilities as an artist. The author cites several articles suggesting that something of this kind was an actual scandal in the years following the War. Certainly, he has a remarkable knowledge of French bureaucracy, and a perfect ear for how the rich use their status to manipulate those less powerful.
I am in awe at Lemaitre's skill at plotting. Starting from just these three major characters, he gradually introduces others鈥斆塪ouard's sister and father, Pradelle's fellow directors, a tenacious inspector from the Ministry, the landlady's daughter who becomes fascinated with 脡douard, and the beautiful maid who falls for Albert鈥攚orking them into the remainder of the novel as integral parts of the action. He has a way of presenting plot twists as faits accomplis, and only then going back to explain how they came about. He is brilliant at building a climax.
Morally, the book is more challenging. I found myself liking quite a few of the characters, but approving of none of them. The attractive ones include the meek yet resourceful Albert, 脡douard's sister, and even his banker father, cold though he seemed at the beginning. But none of the characters are without bad traits, and even our heroes engage in deceptive, if not downright criminal, behavior. The back cover calls the novel a "fresco of a rare cruelty," and there is certainly a quality of violence to the writing, that almost revels in injury, insult, and degradation (not to mention decomposing bodies) as though this were a 19th-century melodrama seen through the lens of an R-rated film-maker.
Hence, I think, my difficulty in finding a context within which to rate this. Its subject is early 20th-century, and Lemaitre mentions a couple of novels from the period that influenced him. But for me, the overriding sensation was of reading a novel from the 19th century. The obvious comparison is with Balzac's , also about a soldier buried alive who finds it difficult to return to civil life. But in scope, it is more like Stendhal, or Zola, or most of all Hugo's ; Lemaitre at one point even compares Pradelle to Javert. In any case, the kind of novel they don't write any more鈥攐r write, if they do, to sell in airports rather than enter for prizes. And yet I was always conscious of this being a 21st-century product, for its attitudes, its authorial voice, and not least for its language that kept me going to the online dictionary, looking up presumably slang words that as often or not I could not find. I feel I cannot possibly give it less than five stars, but part of me wonders how much of this is due to the undertaking of reading it in French. When it becomes a best-seller in English, will it seem then merely another blockbuster historical novel, or truly a prizewinner, something exceptional? We shall see.
======
After corresponding with a couple of Francophone friends, I would add the following. Much of my difficulty with context probably stems from the fact that the book is written simultaneously in two registers, the literary and the popular, which often jostle one another within the bounds of a single sentence. It is a kind of sampling technique that could really only be done in the postmodern era, even though the story goes back a century, and the idea of the grand novel a century before that. Secondly, it is a book that changes its colors as it progresses. The opening 150 pages have a philosophical depth, psychological perception, and richness of style which does not at all conflict with the Prix Goncourt world. But as it becomes increasingly more of a plot-driven novel, it also becomes more commercial鈥攖hough doubtless highly successful in that genre.
December 6, 2023
围蠅蟻委蟼 伪渭蠁喂尾慰位委伪, 苇谓伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 伪蟺慰位伪蠀蟽蟿喂魏蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 魏伪喂 蟺位苇慰谓 蠄蠀蠂伪纬蠅纬喂魏维 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂伪 蟿畏谓 蟿蠉蠂畏 谓伪 未喂伪尾维蟽蠅 蟿慰谓 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰 魏伪喂蟻蠈. 螒蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻蠋蟿畏 魏喂蠈位伪蟼 蟽蔚位委未伪 魏伪蟿维位伪尾伪 蠈蟿喂 伪谓 渭畏 蟿喂 维位位慰 胃伪 蟺蔚蟻谓慰蠉蟽伪 蟺慰位蠉 蠈渭慰蟻蠁伪 蟿畏谓 蠋蟻伪 渭慰蠀 蠈蟽慰 魏蟻伪蟿慰蠉蟽蔚 畏 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏 蟿慰蠀 尾喂尾位委慰蠀, 魏伪喂 慰喂 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓蔚蟼 蟽蔚位委未蔚蟼 蟿慰 伪蟺苇未蔚喂尉伪谓 蟺苇蟻伪谓 蟺维蟽畏蟼 伪渭蠁喂尾慰位委伪蟼. 螖蔚谓 蠀蟺萎蟻尉蔚 慰蠉蟿蔚 渭喂伪 蟿蠈蟽畏 未伪 蟽蟿喂纬渭萎 蟺慰蠀 谓伪 渭蔚 魏维谓蔚喂 谓伪 魏慰蠀蟻伪蟽蟿蠋 萎 谓伪 尾伪蟻蔚胃蠋 萎 谓伪 蠂维蟽蠅 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 渭慰蠀, 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 未喂维尾伪蟽伪 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 渭蔚 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿畏 蟺蟻慰蟽萎位蠅蟽畏, 蟿伪尉委未蔚蠄伪 谓慰蔚蟻维 蟺委蟽蠅 蟽蟿慰谓 蠂蟻蠈谓慰, 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 渭萎谓蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 渭蔚蟿维 蟿慰谓 螒' 螤伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂慰 螤蠈位蔚渭慰, 魏伪喂 萎蟿伪谓 蟽伪谓 谓伪 蔚委未伪 渭蔚 蟿伪 委未喂伪 渭慰蠀 蟿伪 渭维蟿喂伪 伪蠀蟿维 蟺慰蠀 蟽蠀谓萎胃蠅蟼 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠋蟺喂味伪谓 蟿伪 伪蟺位维 蠁伪谓蟿伪蟻维魏喂伪 蟺慰蠀 纬蠉蟻喂蟽伪谓 蟽伪魏伪蟿蔚渭苇谓伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 渭苇蟿蠅蟺慰, 蟿蠈蟽慰 蟽蠅渭伪蟿喂魏维 蠈蟽慰 魏伪喂 蠄蠀蠂慰位慰纬喂魏维 (蠁蠀蟽喂魏维 蠀蟺萎蟻尉伪谓 魏伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰委 蟺慰蠀 蟿伪 魏慰谓蠈渭畏蟽伪谓, 蟺伪蟿蠋谓蟿伪蟼 蔚蟺委 蟺蟿蠅渭维蟿蠅谓). 螚 蟺位慰魏萎 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽委纬慰蠀蟻伪 蟺慰位蠉 魏伪位慰未慰蠀位蔚渭苇谓畏 魏伪喂 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀蟽伪, 渭蔚 伪蟻魏蔚蟿苇蟼 未蠈蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽伪蟽蟺苇谓蟼 蔚魏蟿蠈蟼 蟿蠅谓 维位位蠅谓 -魏伪胃蠋蟼 蔚蟺委蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 渭蔚 苇谓伪 蟺慰位蠉 蠅蟻伪委慰 魏伪喂 蟿伪喂蟻喂伪蟽蟿蠈 蠁喂谓维位蔚-, 蠈渭蠅蟼 蟿畏谓 蠈位畏 未喂伪蠁慰蟻维 蟿畏谓 魏维谓蔚喂 畏 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 蠀蟺苇蟻慰蠂畏 纬蟻伪蠁萎 蟿慰蠀 螞蔚渭苇蟿蟻, 蟺慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿委纬魏伪 蟽蟿慰谓 魏蠀谓喂蟽渭蠈 魏伪喂 蟿慰 渭伪蠉蟻慰 蠂喂慰蠉渭慰蟻, 慰蟺蠅蟽未萎蟺慰蟿蔚 纬位伪蠁蠀蟻萎 魏伪喂 蠂蔚喂渭伪蟻蟻蠋未畏蟼, 魏伪喂 蟽蠀谓 蟿慰喂蟼 维位位慰喂蟼 伪蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿伪 蔚胃喂蟽蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 蔚蠀魏慰位慰未喂维尾伪蟽蟿畏. 螝伪喂, 尾苇尾伪喂伪, 慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 维渭蔚蟽伪 魏伪喂 苇渭渭蔚蟽伪 伪纬纬委味蔚喂 蟺慰位位维 胃苇渭伪蟿伪, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 慰 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰蟼, 畏 蠁蟿蠋蠂蔚喂伪, 畏 伪纬维蟺畏, 畏 蠁喂位委伪, 蠈位伪 伪蠀蟿维, 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁苇蟼 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 未喂伪位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 谓伪 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎蟽蔚喂 蟺慰喂魏委位伪 蟽蠀谓伪喂蟽胃萎渭伪蟿伪, 蟺慰位位苇蟼 蠁慰蟻苇蟼 伪谓蟿喂魏蟻慰蠀蠈渭蔚谓伪, 蔚谓蠋 蟽委纬慰蠀蟻伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻谓蔚喂 谓伪 蟽魏喂伪纬蟻伪蠁萎蟽蔚喂 魏维蟺慰喂慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位蠉 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 喂未喂伪委蟿蔚蟻慰蠀蟼 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼, 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 胃蠀渭维渭伪喂 纬喂伪 魏伪喂蟻蠈 魏伪喂 蟺慰蠀 蟽委纬慰蠀蟻伪 胃伪 渭慰蠀 位蔚委蠄慰蠀谓. 螘谓谓慰蔚委蟿伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 蟽蟿慰 维渭蔚蟽慰 渭苇位位慰谓 胃伪 未喂伪尾维蟽蠅 魏伪喂 蟿伪 蔚蟺蠈渭蔚谓伪 未蠀慰 尾喂尾位委伪 蟿畏蟼 韦蟻喂位慰纬委伪蟼 (蟿慰 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰 苇蠂蔚喂 萎未畏 魏蠀魏位慰蠁慰蟻萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿伪 蔚位位畏谓喂魏维, 蔚谓蠋 伪谓伪渭苇谓蔚蟿伪喂 魏伪喂 蟿慰 蟿蟻委蟿慰), 苇蟽蟿蠅 魏伪喂 伪谓 委蟽蠅蟼 谓伪 渭畏谓 蠁蟿维谓慰蠀谓 蔚魏伪蟿蠈 蟿慰喂蟼 蔚魏伪蟿蠈 蟿慰 蔚蟺委蟺蔚未慰 蟿慰蠀 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰蠀.
September 19, 2019
Nhi峄乽 ng瓢峄漣 kh么ng th铆ch cu峄憂 n脿y, n贸 qu谩 d脿i, qu谩 瓢 c峄� 膽i峄僴, qu谩 kh谩c bi峄噒 v峄沬 nh峄痭g cu峄憂 Goncourt kh谩c, n啤i ng瓢峄漣 ta 膽峄� cao m峄檛 gi峄峮g v膬n 膽岷筽, m峄檛 膽峄� d脿i v峄玜 ph岷, m峄檛 t谩c gi岷� c貌n h啤i h啤i xa l岷� v峄沬 c么ng ch煤ng. B岷 ng瓢峄漣 y锚u th矛 b岷, ch峄� 4 sao th么i, c谩i k岷縯 c峄 n贸 qu谩 vi锚n m茫n, theo c谩ch n脿o 膽贸 th矛 s峄� vi锚n m茫n ch岷� khi岷縩 ai nh峄� 膽岷縩, c貌n c谩i k岷縯 m脿 khi岷縩 膽峄檆 gi岷� tr脿o m谩u h峄峮g v矛 t峄ヽ, ngh矛n n膬m sau v岷玭 c貌n 么m h岷璶 khi nh岷痗 膽岷縩.
C貌n m矛nh? M矛nh th岷 n贸 qu谩 瓢 l脿 s瓢峄沶g. C谩i kho谩i c岷 c峄 cu峄憂 n脿y kh么ng n岷眒 峄� nh峄痭g c芒u v膬n 膽岷筽 m脿 ta ph岷 膽峄峜 to th脿nh ti岷縩g, vang v峄峮g trong t芒m t瓢峄焠g; ch煤ng n岷眒 峄� n峄檌 dung c芒u chuy峄噉, n岷眒 峄� th谩i 膽峄� c峄 t峄玭g nh芒n v岷璽 膽峄慽 v峄沬 chi岷縩 tranh, v脿 h岷璾 chi岷縩 tranh. Ch煤ng c贸 g矛 膽贸 r岷 d峄璶g d瓢ng, b岷 c岷. Gi峄憂g nh瓢 l脿, s峄� t岷 ph脿o c峄 c芒u chuy峄噉 phi岷縨, c峄 nh峄痭g b峄痑 tr脿 nh岷 nh岷給 khi kh么ng c贸 g矛 膽峄� n贸i. V脿 h啤n h岷縯, n贸 gi峄憂g v峄沬 s峄� v么 ngh末a c峄 chi岷縩 tranh, s峄� v么 ngh末a 膽岷縩 phi l铆, t峄沬 t岷璶 c霉ng.
Chi岷縩 tranh, theo ki峄僽 c峄 b谩c n脿y, ch峄� l脿 ph么ng b岷 cho nh峄痭g t岷 tu峄搉g sau 膽贸. L脿 ph么ng b岷, kh么ng h啤n kh么ng k茅m. Nh瓢ng n岷縰 kh么ng c贸 n贸, cu峄檆 膽峄漣 3 ng瓢峄漣 l铆nh trong c芒u chuy峄噉 n脿y 膽茫 tr峄� n锚n r岷 kh谩c. Kh么ng ph岷 cu峄檆 chi岷縩 膽茫 khi岷縩 h峄� 膽峄昳 thay, m脿 l脿 c谩ch ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c, nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 峄� l岷, nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 s峄憂g s贸t, nh峄痭g k岷� c岷 膽岷, nh矛n nh岷璶 cu峄檆 chi岷縩 m峄沬 khi岷縩 3 con ng瓢峄漣 岷 thay 膽峄昳. 脗u c农ng l脿 m峄檛 h峄� qu岷� t岷 y岷縰, c峄 th峄漣 膽岷 x瓢a v脿 nay.
Th岷�, n贸 c贸 膽谩ng 膽峄峜 kh么ng? Qu谩 瓢 l脿 c贸. D岷玼 cho n贸 c峄� sale-off 50% ho脿i ho脿i. Nh峄痭g th峄� r岷� ti峄乶 ch岷硁g bao gi峄� l脿 r岷� r煤ng c岷�, s峄ヽ s峄憂g c峄 n贸 m茫nh li峄噒 l岷痬. 膼峄峜 膽i k岷籵 l峄� ~~
C貌n m矛nh? M矛nh th岷 n贸 qu谩 瓢 l脿 s瓢峄沶g. C谩i kho谩i c岷 c峄 cu峄憂 n脿y kh么ng n岷眒 峄� nh峄痭g c芒u v膬n 膽岷筽 m脿 ta ph岷 膽峄峜 to th脿nh ti岷縩g, vang v峄峮g trong t芒m t瓢峄焠g; ch煤ng n岷眒 峄� n峄檌 dung c芒u chuy峄噉, n岷眒 峄� th谩i 膽峄� c峄 t峄玭g nh芒n v岷璽 膽峄慽 v峄沬 chi岷縩 tranh, v脿 h岷璾 chi岷縩 tranh. Ch煤ng c贸 g矛 膽贸 r岷 d峄璶g d瓢ng, b岷 c岷. Gi峄憂g nh瓢 l脿, s峄� t岷 ph脿o c峄 c芒u chuy峄噉 phi岷縨, c峄 nh峄痭g b峄痑 tr脿 nh岷 nh岷給 khi kh么ng c贸 g矛 膽峄� n贸i. V脿 h啤n h岷縯, n贸 gi峄憂g v峄沬 s峄� v么 ngh末a c峄 chi岷縩 tranh, s峄� v么 ngh末a 膽岷縩 phi l铆, t峄沬 t岷璶 c霉ng.
Chi岷縩 tranh, theo ki峄僽 c峄 b谩c n脿y, ch峄� l脿 ph么ng b岷 cho nh峄痭g t岷 tu峄搉g sau 膽贸. L脿 ph么ng b岷, kh么ng h啤n kh么ng k茅m. Nh瓢ng n岷縰 kh么ng c贸 n贸, cu峄檆 膽峄漣 3 ng瓢峄漣 l铆nh trong c芒u chuy峄噉 n脿y 膽茫 tr峄� n锚n r岷 kh谩c. Kh么ng ph岷 cu峄檆 chi岷縩 膽茫 khi岷縩 h峄� 膽峄昳 thay, m脿 l脿 c谩ch ng瓢峄漣 kh谩c, nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 峄� l岷, nh峄痭g ng瓢峄漣 s峄憂g s贸t, nh峄痭g k岷� c岷 膽岷, nh矛n nh岷璶 cu峄檆 chi岷縩 m峄沬 khi岷縩 3 con ng瓢峄漣 岷 thay 膽峄昳. 脗u c农ng l脿 m峄檛 h峄� qu岷� t岷 y岷縰, c峄 th峄漣 膽岷 x瓢a v脿 nay.
Th岷�, n贸 c贸 膽谩ng 膽峄峜 kh么ng? Qu谩 瓢 l脿 c贸. D岷玼 cho n贸 c峄� sale-off 50% ho脿i ho脿i. Nh峄痭g th峄� r岷� ti峄乶 ch岷硁g bao gi峄� l脿 r岷� r煤ng c岷�, s峄ヽ s峄憂g c峄 n贸 m茫nh li峄噒 l岷痬. 膼峄峜 膽i k岷籵 l峄� ~~
March 29, 2019
乇賲丕賳蹖 倬乇 賲丨鬲賵丕 丕賲丕 亘蹖 噩賴鬲 讴卮 丿丕乇貙 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿踿 賮乇丕賳爻賵蹖 亘乇賳丿踿 噩丕蹖夭踿 诏賳讴賵乇 丿乇 爻丕賱 2013
乇賲丕賳蹖 亘丕 賲賵囟賵毓 噩賳诏 亘蹖賳 賮乇丕賳爻賴 賵 丌賱賲丕賳. 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 丿乇 賱丨馗丕鬲蹖 丕夭 噩賳诏 賵 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 亘毓丿 丕夭 噩賳诏. 亘丕 丕卮丕乇丕鬲 賲禺鬲賱賮 亘賴 丕賵囟丕毓 乇賵丨蹖 丕賮乇丕丿 賵 噩丕賲毓賴. 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 爻乇亘丕夭蹖 賲乇丿丿 賵 丿乇 匕丕鬲賽 禺賵丿 鬲乇爻賵爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇禺蹖 丕夭 氐丨賳賴 賴丕蹖 噩賳诏 丿乇 賲賯丕亘賱 毓馗賲鬲 乇賵丨 丕賵 亘夭乇诏 丕爻鬲. 丕丿賵丕乇丿 倬乇蹖讴賵乇 賮乇夭賳丿 賲. 倬乇蹖讴賵乇 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿貙 讴賴 胤乇丨 賴丕蹖 乇賵夭丕賳踿 禺賵亘蹖 丿乇 丿賮鬲乇卮 賲蹖 讴卮丿貙 亘賴 賳噩丕鬲 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 丕賯丿丕賲 賲蹖 讴賳丿 賵賱蹖 氐賵乇鬲 丕賵 亘丕 丕氐丕亘鬲 鬲乇讴卮 丌爻蹖亘 丿蹖丿賴 賵 禺賵丿卮 禺丕賳賴 賳卮蹖賳 賲蹖 卮賵丿. 亘毓丿賴丕 氐丿賴丕 诏賵賳賴 賲丕爻讴 亘乇丕蹖 倬賵卮丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 趩賴乇踿 讴乇蹖賴 亘丕 丨賮乇賴 丕蹖 丿乇 賵爻胤 丿乇爻鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿. 丕毓鬲蹖丕丿 亘賴 賲賵乇賮蹖賳 賵 丿乇 丕丿丕賲賴貙 賴乇賵卅蹖賳 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 鬲賱禺 丕賵 乇丕 乇賯賲 賲蹖 夭賳丿.
98/01/09
乇賲丕賳蹖 亘丕 賲賵囟賵毓 噩賳诏 亘蹖賳 賮乇丕賳爻賴 賵 丌賱賲丕賳. 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 丿乇 賱丨馗丕鬲蹖 丕夭 噩賳诏 賵 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丿賵 爻乇亘丕夭 亘毓丿 丕夭 噩賳诏. 亘丕 丕卮丕乇丕鬲 賲禺鬲賱賮 亘賴 丕賵囟丕毓 乇賵丨蹖 丕賮乇丕丿 賵 噩丕賲毓賴. 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 爻乇亘丕夭蹖 賲乇丿丿 賵 丿乇 匕丕鬲賽 禺賵丿 鬲乇爻賵爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇禺蹖 丕夭 氐丨賳賴 賴丕蹖 噩賳诏 丿乇 賲賯丕亘賱 毓馗賲鬲 乇賵丨 丕賵 亘夭乇诏 丕爻鬲. 丕丿賵丕乇丿 倬乇蹖讴賵乇 賮乇夭賳丿 賲. 倬乇蹖讴賵乇 孬乇賵鬲賲賳丿貙 讴賴 胤乇丨 賴丕蹖 乇賵夭丕賳踿 禺賵亘蹖 丿乇 丿賮鬲乇卮 賲蹖 讴卮丿貙 亘賴 賳噩丕鬲 丌賱亘乇 賲丕蹖丕乇 丕賯丿丕賲 賲蹖 讴賳丿 賵賱蹖 氐賵乇鬲 丕賵 亘丕 丕氐丕亘鬲 鬲乇讴卮 丌爻蹖亘 丿蹖丿賴 賵 禺賵丿卮 禺丕賳賴 賳卮蹖賳 賲蹖 卮賵丿. 亘毓丿賴丕 氐丿賴丕 诏賵賳賴 賲丕爻讴 亘乇丕蹖 倬賵卮丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 趩賴乇踿 讴乇蹖賴 亘丕 丨賮乇賴 丕蹖 丿乇 賵爻胤 丿乇爻鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿. 丕毓鬲蹖丕丿 亘賴 賲賵乇賮蹖賳 賵 丿乇 丕丿丕賲賴貙 賴乇賵卅蹖賳 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 鬲賱禺 丕賵 乇丕 乇賯賲 賲蹖 夭賳丿.
98/01/09
October 1, 2022
Rompecabezas
Cuando esta novela gan贸 el Goncourt le铆 una nota, seguramente en El Pa铆s, que despert贸 mi inter茅s. Varios a帽os despu茅s, mi mam谩 me pidi贸 una recomendaci贸n para regalarle un libro a un amigo de la familia y le recomend茅 este, sin haberlo le铆do. Fue un 茅xito. Hace unos meses, mi cu帽ada cumpli贸 a帽os y se lo regal茅. Pas贸 por ella, por mi suegra y por miqueridaesposa y a todas les gust贸. Lleg贸 el tiempo de que lo agarrara yo.
Soy mal铆simo para las citas, no las recuerdo bien y muchas me parecen ap贸crifas, pero dicen que Borges dec铆a que las novelas policiales "carec铆an del prestigio del tedio". Esta novela cumple con esa premisa. Nunca te vas a aburrir. La historia tiene un gancho que te mantiene hasta el final. Y, si sos de los que se aburren de los que hacen gala de su estilo, este libro puede ser para vos.
As铆 y todo, a m铆 mucho no me gust贸. Tiene, sin dudas, un gran personaje, pero los dem谩s me parecieron un poco burdos. Ya que haya malos muy malos, tipo los de Marvel, a m铆 me pone un poco nervioso. Y, a todos los que intentamos escribir nos ense帽an el "show don麓t tell", mostrar a los personajes por sus acciones y no ser, digamos, tan expl铆citos. Esta novela no cumple con esa premisa. A veces me parece que hasta est谩 sobreexplicado. Cada cap铆tulo parece que la pieza de un rompecabezas y, la trama por momentos tiene los giros de una telenovela latinoamericana.
Pero bueno, son mis apreciaciones, esta novela es un fen贸meno literario de cr铆tica y lectores en Francia, estoy en franca minor铆a, a煤n en mi c铆rculo familiar.
==
Si te gustan mis rese帽as tal vez tambi茅n te guste mi newsletter sobre libros que se llama "No se puede leer todo". Se pueden suscribir gratis, poniendo su mail en este link: La encuentran en Twitter como @Nosepuedeleert1, en Instagram como @Nosepuedeleertodo y en Facebook.
Gracias, te espero
Sant
Cuando esta novela gan贸 el Goncourt le铆 una nota, seguramente en El Pa铆s, que despert贸 mi inter茅s. Varios a帽os despu茅s, mi mam谩 me pidi贸 una recomendaci贸n para regalarle un libro a un amigo de la familia y le recomend茅 este, sin haberlo le铆do. Fue un 茅xito. Hace unos meses, mi cu帽ada cumpli贸 a帽os y se lo regal茅. Pas贸 por ella, por mi suegra y por miqueridaesposa y a todas les gust贸. Lleg贸 el tiempo de que lo agarrara yo.
Soy mal铆simo para las citas, no las recuerdo bien y muchas me parecen ap贸crifas, pero dicen que Borges dec铆a que las novelas policiales "carec铆an del prestigio del tedio". Esta novela cumple con esa premisa. Nunca te vas a aburrir. La historia tiene un gancho que te mantiene hasta el final. Y, si sos de los que se aburren de los que hacen gala de su estilo, este libro puede ser para vos.
As铆 y todo, a m铆 mucho no me gust贸. Tiene, sin dudas, un gran personaje, pero los dem谩s me parecieron un poco burdos. Ya que haya malos muy malos, tipo los de Marvel, a m铆 me pone un poco nervioso. Y, a todos los que intentamos escribir nos ense帽an el "show don麓t tell", mostrar a los personajes por sus acciones y no ser, digamos, tan expl铆citos. Esta novela no cumple con esa premisa. A veces me parece que hasta est谩 sobreexplicado. Cada cap铆tulo parece que la pieza de un rompecabezas y, la trama por momentos tiene los giros de una telenovela latinoamericana.
Pero bueno, son mis apreciaciones, esta novela es un fen贸meno literario de cr铆tica y lectores en Francia, estoy en franca minor铆a, a煤n en mi c铆rculo familiar.
==
Si te gustan mis rese帽as tal vez tambi茅n te guste mi newsletter sobre libros que se llama "No se puede leer todo". Se pueden suscribir gratis, poniendo su mail en este link: La encuentran en Twitter como @Nosepuedeleert1, en Instagram como @Nosepuedeleertodo y en Facebook.
Gracias, te espero
Sant
November 21, 2018
韦喂 谓伪 蟺蟻蠅蟿慰蟺蠋 魏伪喂 蟿喂 蟺蟻蠅蟿慰蟽蠂慰位喂维蟽蠅 纬喂'伪蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰!螝伪蟿维蠁蔚蟻蔚 谓伪 渭伪纬谓畏蟿委蟽蔚喂 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 渭慰蠀 魏伪喂 蔚纬蠋 蟺蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏维 未蔚谓 蔚委渭伪喂 蠁伪谓 蟿蠅谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂魏蠋谓 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻畏渭维蟿蠅谓 .螚 纬蟻伪蠁萎 蟿慰蠀 螞蔚渭苇蟿蟻 伪蟺慰蟿蠀蟺蠋谓蔚喂 尉蔚魏维胃伪蟻伪 蟿慰 魏位委渭伪 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟺慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 未委谓蔚喂 蠁蠅谓萎 蟽蔚 渭委伪 纬蔚谓喂维 蟿蠈蟽慰 渭伪魏蟻喂谓萎 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏 未喂魏萎 渭伪蟼 .
螔蟻喂蟽魏蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟿畏 渭蔚蟿伪蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏萎 螕伪位位委伪 蟿慰蠀 螒' 蟺伪纬魏慰蟽渭委慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠀胃慰蠉渭蔚 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 未蠉慰 蠁委位蠅谓 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿喂蠅蟿蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 谓伪 蔚蟺慰蠀位蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟿喂蟼 蟺位畏纬苇蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰蠀蟼 维蠁畏蟽蔚 慰 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰蟼.螣 螘谓蟿慰蠀维蟻 ,魏伪蟿伪蟺喂蔚蟽渭苇谓慰蟼 魏伪位位喂蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 蟺慰蠀 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰 蟽蟿蠈蠂伪蟽蟿蟻慰 蟿慰蠀 伪蠀蟽蟿畏蟻慰蠉 蟿蟻伪蟺蔚味委蟿畏 蟺伪蟿苇蟻伪 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 慰 螒位渭蟺苇蟻,苇谓伪蟼 未畏渭蠈蟽喂慰蟼 蠀蟺维位位畏位慰蟼 蠂伪渭畏位蠋谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠋谓 蟽蟿蟻蠅渭维蟿蠅谓 .螠伪味委 胃伪 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻萎蟽慰蠀谓 谓伪 蔚蟺喂尾喂蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 渭委伪 螕伪位位委伪 蟺慰蠀 尉苇蟻蔚喂 谓伪 蟿喂渭维 蟿慰蠀蟼 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟼 蟿畏蟼 ,蠈蠂喂 蠈渭蠅蟼 谓伪 蟺伪蟻苇蠂蔚喂 渭委伪 伪蟽蠁伪位萎 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰蟺蟻蔚蟺萎 味蠅萎 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿慰蠉蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭畏蟽伪谓 纬喂'伪蠀蟿萎谓.螣喂 未蠉慰 蠁委位慰喂 胃伪 蔚蟺喂谓慰萎蟽慰蠀谓 苇谓伪 蟽蠂苇未喂慰 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 谓伪 味萎蟽慰蠀谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 尉蔚蠁蠉纬慰蠀谓 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 蟺蔚蟻喂胃蠋蟻喂慰.螤伪蟻维位位畏位伪 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠀胃慰蠉渭蔚 魏伪喂 蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟿慰蠀 伪尉喂蠅渭伪蟿喂魏慰蠉 蟿慰蠀蟼 螒谓蟻喂 谓蟿'螣谓蟿蔚位 螤蟻伪谓蟿蔚位 , 慰 慰蟺慰委慰蟼 魏伪蟿伪蠁蔚蠉纬蔚喂 蟽蔚 伪胃苇渭喂蟿伪 渭苇蟽伪 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏蔚蟻未慰蟽魏慰蟺萎蟽蔚喂 .
螆谓蟿慰谓慰 蟿慰 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委慰 蟿慰蠀 black humor 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位萎蟼 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 "魏伪魏慰蠉蟼" 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼.
螔蟻喂蟽魏蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟿畏 渭蔚蟿伪蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏萎 螕伪位位委伪 蟿慰蠀 螒' 蟺伪纬魏慰蟽渭委慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠀胃慰蠉渭蔚 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 未蠉慰 蠁委位蠅谓 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿喂蠅蟿蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 谓伪 蔚蟺慰蠀位蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟿喂蟼 蟺位畏纬苇蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰蠀蟼 维蠁畏蟽蔚 慰 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰蟼.螣 螘谓蟿慰蠀维蟻 ,魏伪蟿伪蟺喂蔚蟽渭苇谓慰蟼 魏伪位位喂蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 蟺慰蠀 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿慰 蟽蟿蠈蠂伪蟽蟿蟻慰 蟿慰蠀 伪蠀蟽蟿畏蟻慰蠉 蟿蟻伪蟺蔚味委蟿畏 蟺伪蟿苇蟻伪 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 慰 螒位渭蟺苇蟻,苇谓伪蟼 未畏渭蠈蟽喂慰蟼 蠀蟺维位位畏位慰蟼 蠂伪渭畏位蠋谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓喂魏蠋谓 蟽蟿蟻蠅渭维蟿蠅谓 .螠伪味委 胃伪 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻萎蟽慰蠀谓 谓伪 蔚蟺喂尾喂蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蟽蔚 渭委伪 螕伪位位委伪 蟺慰蠀 尉苇蟻蔚喂 谓伪 蟿喂渭维 蟿慰蠀蟼 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟼 蟿畏蟼 ,蠈蠂喂 蠈渭蠅蟼 谓伪 蟺伪蟻苇蠂蔚喂 渭委伪 伪蟽蠁伪位萎 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰蟺蟻蔚蟺萎 味蠅萎 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿慰蠉蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟺慰位苇渭畏蟽伪谓 纬喂'伪蠀蟿萎谓.螣喂 未蠉慰 蠁委位慰喂 胃伪 蔚蟺喂谓慰萎蟽慰蠀谓 苇谓伪 蟽蠂苇未喂慰 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 谓伪 味萎蟽慰蠀谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 尉蔚蠁蠉纬慰蠀谓 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 蟺蔚蟻喂胃蠋蟻喂慰.螤伪蟻维位位畏位伪 蟺伪蟻伪魏慰位慰蠀胃慰蠉渭蔚 魏伪喂 蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟿慰蠀 伪尉喂蠅渭伪蟿喂魏慰蠉 蟿慰蠀蟼 螒谓蟻喂 谓蟿'螣谓蟿蔚位 螤蟻伪谓蟿蔚位 , 慰 慰蟺慰委慰蟼 魏伪蟿伪蠁蔚蠉纬蔚喂 蟽蔚 伪胃苇渭喂蟿伪 渭苇蟽伪 纬喂伪 谓伪 魏蔚蟻未慰蟽魏慰蟺萎蟽蔚喂 .
螆谓蟿慰谓慰 蟿慰 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委慰 蟿慰蠀 black humor 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位萎蟼 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 "魏伪魏慰蠉蟼" 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼.
May 9, 2020
La verdad es que Lemaitre es un valor seguro. Cambio de registro total con respecto a sus obras de Novela negra.
Determinados aspectos de la novela no me han dejado un buen sabor de boca, no quiero hacer spolilers, pero todo el tema de la picaresca con la gesti贸n de los muertos tras el final de la 1陋 Guerra Mundial, basado en hechos reales, el tratamiento a los veteranos tras la desmovilizaci贸n, la pobreza y el abandono en que vivieron muchos de ellos, en muchos casos con graves mutilaciones, se pone de manifiesto con gran crudeza por el autor y no deja en muy buen lugar a la sociedad francesa de la posguerra. La agudeza y los toques de humor de la narrativa del autor en medio de todo este drama ayuda a sobrellevar la historia y te enganchan irremisiblemente hasta el final. La trama y los personajes en alg煤n momento no me han parecido demasiado cre铆bles, por algo le falta una estrella.
En cualquier caso se entiende perfectamente que este libro haya calado hondo en Francia tras su publicaci贸n. Por mi parte voy a por el segundo: "Los colores del incendio".
Determinados aspectos de la novela no me han dejado un buen sabor de boca, no quiero hacer spolilers, pero todo el tema de la picaresca con la gesti贸n de los muertos tras el final de la 1陋 Guerra Mundial, basado en hechos reales, el tratamiento a los veteranos tras la desmovilizaci贸n, la pobreza y el abandono en que vivieron muchos de ellos, en muchos casos con graves mutilaciones, se pone de manifiesto con gran crudeza por el autor y no deja en muy buen lugar a la sociedad francesa de la posguerra. La agudeza y los toques de humor de la narrativa del autor en medio de todo este drama ayuda a sobrellevar la historia y te enganchan irremisiblemente hasta el final. La trama y los personajes en alg煤n momento no me han parecido demasiado cre铆bles, por algo le falta una estrella.
En cualquier caso se entiende perfectamente que este libro haya calado hondo en Francia tras su publicaci贸n. Por mi parte voy a por el segundo: "Los colores del incendio".
November 30, 2014
Pierre Lemaitre, autor de v谩rios romances policiais, escreve o seu primeiro livro n茫o "negro" e com ele vence o Pr茅mio Goncourt em 2013.
At茅 nos vermos l谩 em cima 茅 um excelente romance - iniciado em Novembro de 1918, durante uma batalha na primeira Guerra Mundial - o qual acompanha dois franceses que, ap贸s a guerra, tentam sobreviver numa Fran莽a que pouca import芒ncia d谩 脿s v铆timas, mortas ou vivas.
Albert, um homem comum. Simples, temeroso, generoso, e cuja dedica莽茫o - por amizade ou gratid茫o - ao seu amigo 茅 inabal谩vel.
脡douard, um homem singular. Criativo, exuberante, exc锚ntrico, louco (ou n茫o). Uma personagem fascinante.
Dizer mais sobre o enredo 茅 penalizar o futuro leitor, pois um dos prazeres desta leitura s茫o as surpresas que o autor foi criando ao longo da narrativa, atrav茅s de uma bonita hist贸ria - de amizade, de amor e de coragem - reveladora da luta dos homens, que divididos entre o Bem e o Mal, tentam manter a sua pr贸pria humanidade e integridade.
At茅 nos vermos l谩 em cima 茅 um excelente romance - iniciado em Novembro de 1918, durante uma batalha na primeira Guerra Mundial - o qual acompanha dois franceses que, ap贸s a guerra, tentam sobreviver numa Fran莽a que pouca import芒ncia d谩 脿s v铆timas, mortas ou vivas.
Albert, um homem comum. Simples, temeroso, generoso, e cuja dedica莽茫o - por amizade ou gratid茫o - ao seu amigo 茅 inabal谩vel.
脡douard, um homem singular. Criativo, exuberante, exc锚ntrico, louco (ou n茫o). Uma personagem fascinante.
Dizer mais sobre o enredo 茅 penalizar o futuro leitor, pois um dos prazeres desta leitura s茫o as surpresas que o autor foi criando ao longo da narrativa, atrav茅s de uma bonita hist贸ria - de amizade, de amor e de coragem - reveladora da luta dos homens, que divididos entre o Bem e o Mal, tentam manter a sua pr贸pria humanidade e integridade.
December 30, 2015
些械 褋械 胁懈写懈屑 褌邪屑 谐芯褉械, 褖械 褋械 胁懈写懈屑 褌褍泻 写芯谢褍:
袠褋褌芯褉懈褔械褋泻懈 褉芯屑邪薪懈 蟹邪 袙褌芯褉邪褌邪 褋胁械褌芯胁薪邪 胁芯泄薪邪 懈 褋谢械写 薪械褟 鈥� 斜芯谢, 褋褉械写 褌褟褏 褕械写褜芯胁褉懈 泻邪褌芯 鈥溞斝拘毖€芯卸械谢邪褌械谢薪懈褌械鈥� 薪邪 袥懈褌械谢 懈 鈥溞撔拘恍秆傂� 懈 屑褗褉褌胁懈褌械鈥� 薪邪 袦械泄谢褗褉, 薪芯 懈 懈蟹褔邪薪褔械薪懈 懈 薪械 蟹邪 胁褋械泻懈 胁泻褍褋 谐褉芯褌械褋泻懈 泻邪褌芯 鈥溞澬把喰秆佈傃娧� 懈 褎褉懈蟹褜芯褉褗褌鈥� 薪邪 啸懈谢蟹械薪褉邪褌 懈 鈥溞撗屝狙� 懈 袦邪泄械褉鈥� 薪邪 袗谢斜邪褏邪褉懈. 袟邪 袩褗褉胁邪褌邪 褋胁械褌芯胁薪邪 褌胁芯褉斜懈褌械 褋邪 锌芯-屑邪谢泻芯, 褌褟 薪械 斜褍写懈 锌芯写芯斜薪邪 械屑芯褑懈芯薪邪谢薪邪 褋褗锌褉懈褔邪褋褌薪芯褋褌 锌芯 褉械写 锌褉懈褔懈薪懈 鈥� 薪芯 械 褉械写薪芯 写邪 芯褌斜械谢械卸邪 鈥溞熝傂秆囆� 锌械褋械薪鈥� 薪邪 肖芯谢泻褋 薪邪锌褉懈屑械褉. 袠 褌芯褔薪芯 褌褍泻 褌械卸泻芯 褋褌褗锌胁邪 鈥溞┬� 褋械 胁懈写懈屑 褌邪屑 谐芯褉械鈥� 薪邪 袩懈械褉 袥褜芯屑械褌褉, 屑邪褖邪斜薪邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褔械褋泻邪 褋邪褌懈褉邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 懈写胁邪 写邪 蟹邪锌褗谢薪懈 锌褉芯锌褍褋泻邪 懈 写邪 芯锌懈褕械 屑邪谢泻芯 芯褌 胁芯泄薪邪褌邪, 蟹邪锌芯褔薪邪谢邪 褋 懈蟹褋褌褉械谢 胁 小邪褉邪械胁芯, 懈 屑薪芯谐芯 芯褌 褋谢械写胁芯械薪薪邪 肖褉邪薪褑懈褟 锌芯 薪邪懈褋褌懈薪邪 薪械锌芯写褉邪卸邪械屑 薪邪褔懈薪. 袩褉械写芯锌褉械写械谢械薪 鈥溞撔拘叫貉冄€鈥� 蟹邪 2013 谐., 蟹邪褋谢褍卸械薪 懈 芯斜褟褋薪懈屑.
Colibri Books
袠褋褌芯褉懈褔械褋泻懈 褉芯屑邪薪懈 蟹邪 袙褌芯褉邪褌邪 褋胁械褌芯胁薪邪 胁芯泄薪邪 懈 褋谢械写 薪械褟 鈥� 斜芯谢, 褋褉械写 褌褟褏 褕械写褜芯胁褉懈 泻邪褌芯 鈥溞斝拘毖€芯卸械谢邪褌械谢薪懈褌械鈥� 薪邪 袥懈褌械谢 懈 鈥溞撔拘恍秆傂� 懈 屑褗褉褌胁懈褌械鈥� 薪邪 袦械泄谢褗褉, 薪芯 懈 懈蟹褔邪薪褔械薪懈 懈 薪械 蟹邪 胁褋械泻懈 胁泻褍褋 谐褉芯褌械褋泻懈 泻邪褌芯 鈥溞澬把喰秆佈傃娧� 懈 褎褉懈蟹褜芯褉褗褌鈥� 薪邪 啸懈谢蟹械薪褉邪褌 懈 鈥溞撗屝狙� 懈 袦邪泄械褉鈥� 薪邪 袗谢斜邪褏邪褉懈. 袟邪 袩褗褉胁邪褌邪 褋胁械褌芯胁薪邪 褌胁芯褉斜懈褌械 褋邪 锌芯-屑邪谢泻芯, 褌褟 薪械 斜褍写懈 锌芯写芯斜薪邪 械屑芯褑懈芯薪邪谢薪邪 褋褗锌褉懈褔邪褋褌薪芯褋褌 锌芯 褉械写 锌褉懈褔懈薪懈 鈥� 薪芯 械 褉械写薪芯 写邪 芯褌斜械谢械卸邪 鈥溞熝傂秆囆� 锌械褋械薪鈥� 薪邪 肖芯谢泻褋 薪邪锌褉懈屑械褉. 袠 褌芯褔薪芯 褌褍泻 褌械卸泻芯 褋褌褗锌胁邪 鈥溞┬� 褋械 胁懈写懈屑 褌邪屑 谐芯褉械鈥� 薪邪 袩懈械褉 袥褜芯屑械褌褉, 屑邪褖邪斜薪邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褔械褋泻邪 褋邪褌懈褉邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 懈写胁邪 写邪 蟹邪锌褗谢薪懈 锌褉芯锌褍褋泻邪 懈 写邪 芯锌懈褕械 屑邪谢泻芯 芯褌 胁芯泄薪邪褌邪, 蟹邪锌芯褔薪邪谢邪 褋 懈蟹褋褌褉械谢 胁 小邪褉邪械胁芯, 懈 屑薪芯谐芯 芯褌 褋谢械写胁芯械薪薪邪 肖褉邪薪褑懈褟 锌芯 薪邪懈褋褌懈薪邪 薪械锌芯写褉邪卸邪械屑 薪邪褔懈薪. 袩褉械写芯锌褉械写械谢械薪 鈥溞撔拘叫貉冄€鈥� 蟹邪 2013 谐., 蟹邪褋谢褍卸械薪 懈 芯斜褟褋薪懈屑.
Colibri Books
April 8, 2014
A painless way to learn more about the aftermath of the First World War. Painless, because it is a very readable book, with an easy, natural flow to the writing style (not at all pretentious, which is what is sometimes associated with the Goncourt Prize). The subject matter, however, is painful. The post-war apathy, disillusionment, cynicism and fraud are very well described. The author is great at maintaining pacing and characterisation throughout - his experience with exciting 'polar' narrative shows.
None of the characters are entirely likable, yet you get caught up in their (often self-inflicted) predicaments. Yes, sometimes it does feel a little like a soap opera. But then soap operas are today's manifestation of the romans fleuves - and this is very much in that style.
None of the characters are entirely likable, yet you get caught up in their (often self-inflicted) predicaments. Yes, sometimes it does feel a little like a soap opera. But then soap operas are today's manifestation of the romans fleuves - and this is very much in that style.
July 11, 2019
賴賲蹖賳 乇賵夭賴丕蹖 噩賴賳賲蹖 讴賴 禺賵丿 賲丕 丕賲乇賵夭 丿乇诏蹖乇 丌賳 賴爻鬲蹖賲 賵 丌賳 乇丕 鬲噩乇亘賴 賲蹖 讴賳蹖賲貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 讴賲讴 賲蹖 讴賳丿 鬲丕 賯氐賴 蹖 倬乇讴卮卮 "丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲" 乇丕 亘丕 诏賵卮鬲 賵 倬賵爻鬲 賵 丕爻鬲禺賵丕賳賲丕賳 丿乇讴 讴賳蹖賲. 噩丿丕 丕夭 鬲噩乇亘賴 蹖 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 賲丕 丿乇 噩賳诏 丕蹖乇丕賳 賵 毓乇丕賯 賵 鬲噩丕乇鬲 倬乇 爻賵丿 亘毓丿 丕夭 丌賳貙 賴賲蹖賳 乇賵夭賴丕 賴賲 賲丕噩乇丕貙 丨丕賱 亘賴 卮讴賱蹖 丿蹖诏乇貙 鬲讴乇丕乇 賲蹖 卮賵丿. 賴賲蹖賳 乇賵夭賴丕 讴賴 夭賲夭賲賴 賴丕蹖 噩賳诏 亘乇賯乇丕乇 丕爻鬲 賵 丕賵囟丕毓 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 禺賵亘 賳蹖爻鬲貙 卮乇蹖賮 賲丕賳丿賳 賵 卮乇蹖賮 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴乇丿賳 噩夭 亘丕 賲賳胤賯蹖 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖讴 鬲賵噩蹖賴 倬匕蹖乇 賳蹖爻鬲. 夭賲丕賳蹖 讴賴 賮乇賵禺鬲賳 卮乇丕賮鬲 賳賴 鬲賳賴丕 爻禺鬲 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賱讴賴 丿乇丌賲丿 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴蹖 賴賲 丿丕乇丿 賵 賳賮乇賵禺鬲賳 丌賳貙 禺乇蹖丿賳 爻禺鬲蹖 乇賵夭诏丕乇 亘賴 噩丕賳 丕爻鬲. "丿蹖丿丕乇 亘賴 賯蹖丕賲鬲" 賯氐賴 蹖 賴賲蹖賳 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 賴丕 丕爻鬲. 賲毓丕賲賱賴 蹖 卮乇丕賮鬲 賵 鬲噩丕乇鬲 乇賵蹖 禺賵賳. 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賯氐賴 賱匕鬲 賲蹖 亘乇蹖丿 賵 乇賳噩 賲蹖 讴卮蹖丿.
鬲蹖乇賲丕賴 1398
鬲蹖乇賲丕賴 1398
August 7, 2020
4/5
Sako, kad apie knyg膮 nereik臈t懦 spr臋sti pagal vir拧el寞, bet kaip d臈l pavadinimo? Nes vos perskai膷iusi 拧寞, tok寞 skamb懦, subtil懦 ir tuo pat metu tiek daug pasakant寞, tobulai knygai tinkant寞, negal臈jau atsispirti norui j膮 perskaityti. Ir nors pastaruoju metu stengiuosi vengti roman懦 apie kar膮, visgi 拧iam padariau i拧imt寞 鈥� greitas pasidom臈jimas leido patik臈ti, kad tai nebus viena t懦 istorij懦, kuriose karas tampa tik fonu banaliai meil臈s istorijai, o visos civilizacijos pikt啪aizd臈s, p奴liniai ir gangrenos 鈥� butaforija, norint parduoti knyg膮. O ir pavadinime nebuvo niekieno 啪monos, sesers, smuiko, d臈啪ut臈s, nosinait臈s, tatuiravimo ma拧in臈l臈s. Jau geras 啪enklas, argi ne? Tod臈l pasirinkdama 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� nesuklydau. Ir karo tema tai buvo vienas geriausi懦, o tuo pat metu ir ma啪iausiai verksming懦 roman懦, kokius tikriausiai teko skaityti po.. Na, ties膮 sakant, po 鈥濪iev懦 mi拧ko鈥�.
Karo beprasmyb臈, siaubas ir neteisyb臈 鈥� ne tokia jau reta tema literat奴roje, o ir kur kas man priimtinesn臈 nei kad nepaliaujamas dejavimas, verkimas ir rank懦 gr膮啪ymas. Pati steb臈jausi kaip greitai ver膷iasi 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� puslapiai, nes tik臈jausi visai ne to 鈥� pasakojimas plaukia lengvai, ironi拧kai ir 拧vent懦j懦 nepaliekant. O svarbiausia - nepretenzingai. Jame n臈ra nei gili懦 filosofini懦 i拧ved啪iojim懦, nei gr奴mojimo kum拧膷iais 寞 dang懦. Nors gali atrodyti beveik 拧ventvagi拧ka, roman膮 pavadin膷iau net labai juokingu 鈥� pa膷ia geriausia 啪od啪io prasme. Karo absurdas, gyvenimus 啪lugdanti, naikinanti, 啪mones parklupdanti neteisyb臈 ir beprasmyb臈 n臈ra tik 拧e拧臈lis 鈥� ja autorius 啪aid啪ia taip sumaniai, kortas tarsi iliuzionistas kei膷ia taip greitai, taip mikliai, jog 拧ypsen膮 ap膷iaupti sunku 鈥� net tada, kai d臈l to jautiesi 拧iek tiek kaltas.
Viso romano metu nepaleid啪ia Pierre Lemaitre siun膷iama emocija: nutiko kas nutiko, negi dabar visi tik s臈d臈sim ir verksim? Ir nors atrodo, kad 啪inutei i拧si懦sti b奴t懦 pakak臋 knygos, kuri b奴t懦 bent kokiu 100 puslapi懦 trumpesn臈, o ir skyriai i拧 kar膮 i拧gyvenusi懦j懦 draug懦 Albero ir Eduaro perspektyvos man buvo kur kas 寞domesni nei tie, kuriuose pasakojamos kit懦 veik臈j懦 istorijos, visgi tai yra romanas apie kar膮, kuris skaitosi greitai, lengvai ir nepalieka kart臈lio nei burnoje, nei 拧irdyje. O man, pavargusiai nuo karo pavertimo reklaminiu 拧奴kiu, tai buvo maloni atgaiva. Vis d臈lto, nerekomenduo膷iau 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� tiems, kurie m臈gsta m臈tytis fraze 鈥濧r tau n臈ra nieko 拧vento???鈥�. Nes Pasaulyje, kuriame egzistuoja karas, nieko 拧vento neb臈ra jau senokai.
Sako, kad apie knyg膮 nereik臈t懦 spr臋sti pagal vir拧el寞, bet kaip d臈l pavadinimo? Nes vos perskai膷iusi 拧寞, tok寞 skamb懦, subtil懦 ir tuo pat metu tiek daug pasakant寞, tobulai knygai tinkant寞, negal臈jau atsispirti norui j膮 perskaityti. Ir nors pastaruoju metu stengiuosi vengti roman懦 apie kar膮, visgi 拧iam padariau i拧imt寞 鈥� greitas pasidom臈jimas leido patik臈ti, kad tai nebus viena t懦 istorij懦, kuriose karas tampa tik fonu banaliai meil臈s istorijai, o visos civilizacijos pikt啪aizd臈s, p奴liniai ir gangrenos 鈥� butaforija, norint parduoti knyg膮. O ir pavadinime nebuvo niekieno 啪monos, sesers, smuiko, d臈啪ut臈s, nosinait臈s, tatuiravimo ma拧in臈l臈s. Jau geras 啪enklas, argi ne? Tod臈l pasirinkdama 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� nesuklydau. Ir karo tema tai buvo vienas geriausi懦, o tuo pat metu ir ma啪iausiai verksming懦 roman懦, kokius tikriausiai teko skaityti po.. Na, ties膮 sakant, po 鈥濪iev懦 mi拧ko鈥�.
Karo beprasmyb臈, siaubas ir neteisyb臈 鈥� ne tokia jau reta tema literat奴roje, o ir kur kas man priimtinesn臈 nei kad nepaliaujamas dejavimas, verkimas ir rank懦 gr膮啪ymas. Pati steb臈jausi kaip greitai ver膷iasi 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� puslapiai, nes tik臈jausi visai ne to 鈥� pasakojimas plaukia lengvai, ironi拧kai ir 拧vent懦j懦 nepaliekant. O svarbiausia - nepretenzingai. Jame n臈ra nei gili懦 filosofini懦 i拧ved啪iojim懦, nei gr奴mojimo kum拧膷iais 寞 dang懦. Nors gali atrodyti beveik 拧ventvagi拧ka, roman膮 pavadin膷iau net labai juokingu 鈥� pa膷ia geriausia 啪od啪io prasme. Karo absurdas, gyvenimus 啪lugdanti, naikinanti, 啪mones parklupdanti neteisyb臈 ir beprasmyb臈 n臈ra tik 拧e拧臈lis 鈥� ja autorius 啪aid啪ia taip sumaniai, kortas tarsi iliuzionistas kei膷ia taip greitai, taip mikliai, jog 拧ypsen膮 ap膷iaupti sunku 鈥� net tada, kai d臈l to jautiesi 拧iek tiek kaltas.
Viso romano metu nepaleid啪ia Pierre Lemaitre siun膷iama emocija: nutiko kas nutiko, negi dabar visi tik s臈d臈sim ir verksim? Ir nors atrodo, kad 啪inutei i拧si懦sti b奴t懦 pakak臋 knygos, kuri b奴t懦 bent kokiu 100 puslapi懦 trumpesn臈, o ir skyriai i拧 kar膮 i拧gyvenusi懦j懦 draug懦 Albero ir Eduaro perspektyvos man buvo kur kas 寞domesni nei tie, kuriuose pasakojamos kit懦 veik臈j懦 istorijos, visgi tai yra romanas apie kar膮, kuris skaitosi greitai, lengvai ir nepalieka kart臈lio nei burnoje, nei 拧irdyje. O man, pavargusiai nuo karo pavertimo reklaminiu 拧奴kiu, tai buvo maloni atgaiva. Vis d臈lto, nerekomenduo膷iau 鈥濱ki pasimatymo ten auk拧tai鈥� tiems, kurie m臈gsta m臈tytis fraze 鈥濧r tau n臈ra nieko 拧vento???鈥�. Nes Pasaulyje, kuriame egzistuoja karas, nieko 拧vento neb臈ra jau senokai.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,546 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.