Elina asked this question about
A People's History of the World:
Is it me or is he just not objective? He states opinion as fact. He omits real analysis. He contradicts himself. He wants to prove something. What is it? I am at chapter 2. Already finding him annoying. Ok I get it you are a socialist. Where are your sources? Where is the analysis? Where is the logic? I will drop it. Does it get interesting later on? Does he actually state facts? Explain with logic and reasoning?
About ŷ Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the ŷ community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.