欧宝娱乐

“The summary of Lambert and Lillenfelt鈥檚 鈥淏loodstains鈥� in Scientific American Mind in the October 12, 2007 The Informed Reader passes along many of these authors鈥� strong opinions on complex and controversial topics without informing the readership that the authors鈥� perspective is extreme, polarized, and vulnerable to challenge at many crucial points.
It is clear that false memories can be implanted in about 25% of subjects, when those memories concern issues in the normal and expectable range of experience. However, about 75% of subjects resist such efforts, and efforts to implant memories of abuse or offensive medical procedures are almost universally rejected. Therefore a wholesale attack against therapies that explore patients鈥� memories is unwarranted. 鈥淩ecovered Memory Therapy鈥� is not a school of treatment. It is a slur used to mischaracterize approaches offensive to the authors鈥� perspectives, designed to evoke an emotional bias against those to whom the slur is applied.”
― Richard P. Kluft