Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

“Accordingly, we find Euler and D'Alembert devoting their talent and their patience to the establishment of the laws of rotation of the solid bodies. Lagrange has incorporated his own analysis of the problem with his general treatment of mechanics, and since his time M. Poinsot has brought the subject under the power of a more searching analysis than that of the calculus, in which ideas take the place of symbols, and intelligent propositions supersede equations.”
― James Clerk Maxwell

“Why isn’t every basic law a miracle by definition?”
― Jerry Fodor

“It is wrong to make statements in the name of science to presuppose the truth instead of accurately representing it.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“It is wrong to equate scientific laws, as a human construct, with the absolute truth.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“It is wrong to use statements such as “there is no south of the South Poleâ€� as proof that there is nothing beyond the point when time stops. Such statements may sound seductive, but they are not scientific, nor do they prove what they try to prove.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“It is wrong to apply the laws and states of our Universe to the state before the Big Bang if we do not have the slightest idea about the “contextâ€� and the state before the Big Bang.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“The lack of time and space in our sense of these concepts does not mean that nothing exists beyond the spacetime continuum.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“To state there is no need for a creator or God if there is no time is meaningless. Because the Absolute is beyond time and space as we know them. Absolute is the Source of time and space and, therefore, does not need time to create or recreate itself through the World.

Such statements are not scientific; they are presuppositions and intellectual constructs that serve as fillers for the lack of accurate understanding or a fundamental theory explaining how reality, which is almost incomprehensible to the human mind, functions.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“There are laws of nature. We may describe the laws of nature but still not wholly unravel and understand them to pronounce that scientific laws are equal to natural laws or that they are an absolute representation of natural laws. Scientific laws did not yet cover, describe, and explain all natural laws, mysteries, and secrets.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Science must be antidogmatic. Only the church can be dogmatic. It would be better for the church to become more scientific and less dogmatic to better understand what God is before representing something created by man, not by God, in words written by man, not by God.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Science is a human construct. Scientific laws are as valid as our understanding at any particular moment. Scientific laws are not absolute. Scientific laws wear human colors. Regardless of how close we got to the truth, the scientific laws are still not 100% accurate and complete. If we do not possess absolute truth, then scientific laws cannot be final, or they may be representative of the truth up to the level of our knowledge and understanding, not more.”
― Dejan Stojanovic

“We may accept the idea that natural laws govern everything in the Universe and that these laws are in some way absolute. Still, we cannot hide behind scientific laws before explaining them. According to Hawking, scientific laws may be enough for our understanding of the World. His implicit message is that the Creator is not needed. Such statements could have been valid if scientific laws were absolute and scientists, including Hawking, resolved the mystery of existence, the Universe, and the origin and future of everything. Since that is not the case, no scientist can replace the idea of the Creator just by insufficient scientific knowledge. Only a scientist or scientists (or anybody) with absolute knowledge can dethrone the Creator if there is such complete knowledge (scientific or otherwise), proving that there is nothing beyond the “pointâ€� where time stops. Unfortunately, this kind of knowledge and understanding does not yet exist. The purpose of science is not to push the Creator out of the picture but to improve, define, and redefine scientific laws in its pursuit of truth.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“One of the tasks of science is to redefine the word and concept of God so that we can come up with an approximate idea about what God is, at least in scientific and academic communities. For instance, the Absolute (Universal Mind) is the Source of Everything, and it exists regardless of whether time stops at some “pointâ€� and irrespective of the no-boundary proposal. The no-boundary proposal is one of the biggest boundaries to the science ever produced in history because it tries to impose the limitations of a particular human mind onto the whole Universe and beyond and declare this limitation, boundary, to be a scientific law.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“We must redefine and come to a consensus on what God (Creator) is and what creation and recreating is. When we do this, we may make the gap between believers and atheists smaller, and we may realize that faith and atheism are compatible. The major incompatibility comes from the preprogrammed thinking and concepts based on religious books. Most of these concepts humanity accepted without real consideration and analysis, betting on the idea of a God that I call the stolen God. A stolen God is not a “realâ€� God and cannot be used against the “realâ€� God if it exists. The idea of a stolen God gains most of its power from the fear of millions or billions of human beings belonging to the major monotheistic religions.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Based on my theory, the Absolute, Supreme Being consists of the Being and the Nonbeing. The Being is part of the Absolute and is not absolute, but the Being is that which was traditionally considered God. The creation of the World is almost equally contingent upon the Being as it is upon the Nonbeing (nothingness). Not only can God not be omnipotent without the Nonbeing or absolute void, but the World’s creation depends almost equally upon these two poles of the Absolute. The Being is the positive pole of the Absolute, and the Nonbeing is the negative. Zero (0) is the wormhole between the Absolute immaterial realm of reality and material reality or the Universe. The Zero, as such, is the Source of Potential Infinity, the Perpetual Motion Machine of Existence, and, in a way, the Absolute itself.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“The Creation of the World or Omniverse is the Creation or Recreation of the Absolute itself through the two poles, two “sidesâ€� of its Self, the Being and the Nonbeing. Without the creating, everything is the Nonbeing. Creating is the Savior of the Absolute and the Being. Otherwise, everything transforms into absolute Nothingness or Nonbeing. Since creating is the recreation of the Creator, it is the activation of the absolute potential to recreate itself in a new way.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“The spacetime continuum is the worldly reality.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Beyond the spacetime continuum is the metaphysical Reality of the Absolute (the Being and Nonbeing).”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Zero is Absolute

+ = B (the Being or God)

� = N (the Nonbeing or Nothingness)

+ � (Being-Nonbeing) = 0 (the Absolute)

At the moment of creation, the Being envelopes the Nonbeing and transforms into the World through the wormhole of Zero. That is the creation of the World or “partialâ€� transformation of the metaphysical into “physical,â€� although the physical is only an appearance (illusion).”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Zero is Absolute Potential

In the metaphysical state:

Zero is the present.

Zero is the representation of the infinite and the eternal.

Zero is the passage from the metaphysical to the “physical� realm at the moment of creation. At this point, the infinite and eternal transform into the categories of the spacetime world.

Zero is also a passage from the past to the future. At this point, the present stops because the present is eternal. The present is only a passage from the past to the future and is only possible in spacetime.

How we see and perceive past and future, or time in a physical sense, exists only in the physical World. Beyond this World is a metaphysical World where there is no spacetime continuum. At this point, time stops.

When the spacetime continuum stops or disappears, past and future disappear, and all past and future are in an absolute Zero as Absolute Potential. All time and space are in Absolute Zero, which is infinite and eternal. Only this Absolute Zero beyond the spacetime continuum is absolute time, which is present, and absolute space, which is nothingness.

Zero in the metaphysical realm is Potential. We may call it, conditionally, passive Zero.
Zero in the spacetime realm is active Zero. In this realm, the present is only a passage from the past to the future. When time stops, it becomes absolute present, which is absolute time or eternity. The Source of all time and space is beyond time and space.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Humans free themselves from conceptual traps by freeing themselves from paradigms that close horizons instead of opening them. Language is the supreme instrument of thought, but a number is a word, too; without a word, there would be no number. Every number corresponds not only to the graphic symbol but also to the linguistic one. Conceptually, numbers and words are different because words represent or name things and phenomena, while numbers represent the quantitative or numeric value of things and phenomena. We understand the function and the role of numbers and words. Through words, others know what we think or want to say. However, even a bird knows what the nest is by feeling it intuitively. A dog, thrown away ten miles from the house where it lived, will find it. Animals often communicate among themselves.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE

“Considering all this, we must reaffirm the great potential of language as an instrument of communication and for expressing the most complex thoughts and ideas. Not only that but in this way, language affects and shapes our thinking to a degree. At the same time, we must reiterate the limitations of language regardless of our desire to be as precise as possible. We can be sure that language is relative. Since language, as an instrument, is not absolute, there can be no absolute way of defining things. In this sense, we must learn to accept implications and hidden meanings as values equally crucial as the obvious ones. Hinting at something is more important and valuable than volumes of sterile compilations of strange words without a more profound sense and meaning.”
― Dejan Stojanovic, ABSOLUTE