Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

“You don't need to like me to let me fuck you but since I like you, I'd prefer it that way.”
― Kristen Ashley, Knight

“Shock is when language and emotion get overwritten by trauma's numbing code.”
― Stewart Stafford

“Are you beating the meat? Flogging the bishop? Spanking the monkey?”
― Matthew Bracey

“La faculté divine est une faculté divine et mystérieuse; car c’est par le rêve que l’homme communique avec le monde ténébreux dont il est environné.”
― Charles Beaudelaire

“Did women actually faint, I wondered, or was that an invention of bad Victorian novels and Friday night picture shows? Or perhaps women simply contrived to collapse at convenient moments to delay the burden of hearing and seeing and feeling, just for a little while. I sympathized.”
― Alix E. Harrow, The Ten Thousand Doors of January

“Another dangerous neoliberal word circulating everywhere that is worth zooming in on is the word ‘resilienceâ€�. On the surface, I think many people won’t object to the idea that it is good and beneficial for us to be resilient to withstand the difficulties and challenges of life. As a person who lived through the atrocities of wars and sanctions in Iraq, I’ve learnt that life is not about being happy or sad, not about laughing or crying, leaving or staying. Life is about endurance. Since most feelings, moods, and states of being are fleeting, endurance, for me, is the common denominator that helps me go through the darkest and most beautiful moments of life knowing that they are fleeing. In that sense, I believe it is good for us to master the art of resilience and endurance. Yet, how should we think about the meaning of ‘resilienceâ€� when used by ruling classes that push for wars and occupations, and that contribute to producing millions of deaths and refugees to profit from plundering the planet? What does it mean when these same warmongers fund humanitarian organizations asking them to go to war-torn countries to teach people the value of ‘resilienceâ€�? What happens to the meaning of ‘resilienceâ€� when they create frighteningly precarious economic structures, uncertain employment, and lay off people without accountability? All this while also asking us to be ‘resilient’â€�
As such, we must not let the word ‘resilience� circulate or get planted in the heads of our youth uncritically. Instead, we should raise questions about what it really means. Does it mean the same thing for a poor young man or woman from Ghana, Ecuador, Afghanistan vs a privileged member from the upper management of a U.S. corporation? Resilience towards what? What is the root of the challenges for which we are expected to be resilient? Does our resilience solve the cause or the root of the problem or does it maintain the status quo while we wait for the next disaster? Are individuals always to blame if their resilience doesn’t yield any results, or should we equally examine the social contract and the entire structure in which individuals live that might be designed in such a way that one’s resilience may not prevail no matter how much perseverance and sacrifice one demonstrates? There is no doubt that resilience, according to its neoliberal corporate meaning, is used in a way that places the sole responsibility of failure on the shoulders of individuals rather than equally holding accountable the structure in which these individuals exist, and the precarious circumstances that require work and commitment way beyond individual capabilities and resources. I find it more effective not to simply aspire to be resilient, but to distinguish between situations in which individual resilience can do, and those for which the depth, awareness, and work of an entire community or society is needed for any real and sustainable change to occur. But none of this can happen if we don’t first agree upon what each of us mean when we say ‘resilience,� and if we have different definitions of what it means, then we should ask: how shall we merge and reconcile our definitions of the word so that we complement not undermine what we do individually and collectively as people. Resilience should not become a synonym for surrender. It is great to be resilient when facing a flood or an earthquake, but that is not the same when having to endure wars and economic crises caused by the ruling class and warmongers.

[From “On the Great Resignationâ€� published on CounterPunch on February 24, 2023]”
― Louis Yako

“How do you want to play it, Captain? Slow and steady, or shock and awe?”
― David Mack, Desperate Hours

“Getting stabbed by an overzealous vampire hunter sucked.”
― Azaaa Davis, Hiss, Rattle and Bite