Jeffrey Keeten's Reviews > Girl in Hyacinth Blue
Girl in Hyacinth Blue
by
by

”She thought of all the people in all the paintings she had seen that day, not just Father’s, in all the paintings of the world, in fact. Their eyes, the particular turn of a head, their loneliness or suffering or grief was borrowed by an artist to be seen by other people throughout the years who would never see them face to face. People who would be that close to her, she thought, a matter of a few arms� lengths, looking, looking, and they would never know her.�
Johannes Vermeer self-portrait cropped from his painting The Procuress (1656).
Johannes Vermeer or Van Der Meer was a 17th century Dutch painter who had a modestly successful career. He would have been more successful, made more money, enjoyed a certain level of comfort if only�
he would paint faster.
He did not paint until the mood struck him, commissions were bothersome, rarely of interest. His life was about light and how to capture that light perfectly for all eternity in the pigment of his paint. I’ve had the pleasure of meeting a few of his paintings in museums across Europe. Every time I’m struck by each and every poetic brush stroke he made to the luminosity of natural light seemingly only to be able to be perceived by the eye of Vermeer in the city of Delft.
He traded paintings for food, for shoes for his children, for debts that accumulated as he pondered the subject for his next painting.
The Concert by Vermeer...absconded with.
There are sixty-six potential Vermeer’s in the world, but only thirty-four are universally recognized as accredited Johannes Vermeer paintings. In 1990 The Concert was stolen from a museum in Boston and has never been recovered. Valued in the neighborhood of $200,000,000 it is the most valuable unrecovered painting in history. We can hope that it landed in the hands of a collector, who is selfishly hoarding it hopefully in a climate controlled environment. Someday the collector will die and the painting will reemerge.
We can hope.
The Astronomer was seized by the Nazis in 1940 from the de Rothschild’s family. It was returned to the family after the war, but was given to the French government in payment for back taxes in 1983. It now hangs in the Louvre. On the back of the painting there is a black ink Swastika.
This brings me to the subject of this book. Susan Vreeland begins by introducing us to Cornelius Engelbrecht who has decided to reveal after many years of hiding the existence of the painting, a Vermeer, to his friend and art lover Richard.
It can’t be...it can’t be a Vermeer.
There are numerous problems in regards to this painting. Provenance, that all important paperwork establishing authenticity, has been lost or separated from the work. The other major problem is how Cornelius’s father obtained possession of the work. Germany, 1940s, opportunities abounded for artwork and other precious things of value to fall into the hands of the less than scrupulous. There are still families trying to get back artwork that was confiscated by the Germans or stolen by opportunists and sold to collectors/museums all over the world.
”Look. Look at her eye. Like a Pearl.�
The Girl in Hyacinth Blue painted by Jonathan Janson
So what is this painting? It is of Magdalena Vermeer, daughter of the painter. The one most like him. The one with sewing shoved into her hands when her fingers ached for the brushes.
”She loved him, loved what he did with that hand, and even, she suspected, loved what he loved, though they had never spoken of it. When that thought lifted her face to his, she saw his cheeks grow softer, as if he noticed her in the house for the first time.�
It was hard for anyone to get his attention, especially a young girl who was loved most when not disruptive to his brooding thoughts.
Vreeland begins the book with Cornelius and then steadily takes us back in time with the painting. The people that swirl around the painting are brought to life and the influence of having something so beautiful gracing their lives shows the greedy need we all have to possess something so alluring. One of my favorite stories is of a poor family trying to save their farm from a flood and in the midst of this conflict a baby is laid in their boat along with the painting with instructions to sell the artwork to feed the baby. The painting becomes a source of tension between the husband and wife. The wife doing anything she can to keep it. The husband, thinking of the winters to come, knows the money from selling it will allow him to expand his breeding stock which will better insure the family's long term survival. The wife becomes rebellious, but her mother sets her straight.
”Work is love made plain, whether man’s or woman’s work, and you’re a fool if you can’t recognize it. The child’s the blessing, Saskia, not the painting.�
When she does finally sell the painting I could feel the pain of the loss as acutely as does Saskia. There is nothing she will ever be able to buy for the rest of her life that will replace the vibrancy of a Vermeer painting. She does leave her mark on the painting because she names it and she passes that name to the buyer.
Morningshine.
In the later chapters we even meet Vermeer as he struggles with creditors and subjects for art that will inspire him to lift his brush. We meet the mutinous Magdalena as she struggles against the forces trying to make her learn the skills that will make her a valuable housewife. How can you mend when you must create? In the final chapter we see her meeting her painting once again. She borrows every scrap of money she can to try and buy it when it comes up for auction, but paintings like that aren’t supposed to be owned by normal people, not even a person who has the blood of the painter cycling through her own heart.
It is always so ironic to think of painters giving away paintings for a loaf of bread and a few decades/centuries later those same works of art becoming worth inconceivable amounts of money.
The book gets better and better as we walk back through history with Vreeland. The later chapters are stellar, poignant, and captivating. They lift the book from a three star to a four star. The author put me in the same room as Vermeer, so much so I could almost see the light the way he saw it.
Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window by Vermeer.
Johannes Vermeer self-portrait cropped from his painting The Procuress (1656).
Johannes Vermeer or Van Der Meer was a 17th century Dutch painter who had a modestly successful career. He would have been more successful, made more money, enjoyed a certain level of comfort if only�
he would paint faster.
He did not paint until the mood struck him, commissions were bothersome, rarely of interest. His life was about light and how to capture that light perfectly for all eternity in the pigment of his paint. I’ve had the pleasure of meeting a few of his paintings in museums across Europe. Every time I’m struck by each and every poetic brush stroke he made to the luminosity of natural light seemingly only to be able to be perceived by the eye of Vermeer in the city of Delft.
He traded paintings for food, for shoes for his children, for debts that accumulated as he pondered the subject for his next painting.
The Concert by Vermeer...absconded with.
There are sixty-six potential Vermeer’s in the world, but only thirty-four are universally recognized as accredited Johannes Vermeer paintings. In 1990 The Concert was stolen from a museum in Boston and has never been recovered. Valued in the neighborhood of $200,000,000 it is the most valuable unrecovered painting in history. We can hope that it landed in the hands of a collector, who is selfishly hoarding it hopefully in a climate controlled environment. Someday the collector will die and the painting will reemerge.
We can hope.
The Astronomer was seized by the Nazis in 1940 from the de Rothschild’s family. It was returned to the family after the war, but was given to the French government in payment for back taxes in 1983. It now hangs in the Louvre. On the back of the painting there is a black ink Swastika.
This brings me to the subject of this book. Susan Vreeland begins by introducing us to Cornelius Engelbrecht who has decided to reveal after many years of hiding the existence of the painting, a Vermeer, to his friend and art lover Richard.
It can’t be...it can’t be a Vermeer.
There are numerous problems in regards to this painting. Provenance, that all important paperwork establishing authenticity, has been lost or separated from the work. The other major problem is how Cornelius’s father obtained possession of the work. Germany, 1940s, opportunities abounded for artwork and other precious things of value to fall into the hands of the less than scrupulous. There are still families trying to get back artwork that was confiscated by the Germans or stolen by opportunists and sold to collectors/museums all over the world.
”Look. Look at her eye. Like a Pearl.�
The Girl in Hyacinth Blue painted by Jonathan Janson
So what is this painting? It is of Magdalena Vermeer, daughter of the painter. The one most like him. The one with sewing shoved into her hands when her fingers ached for the brushes.
”She loved him, loved what he did with that hand, and even, she suspected, loved what he loved, though they had never spoken of it. When that thought lifted her face to his, she saw his cheeks grow softer, as if he noticed her in the house for the first time.�
It was hard for anyone to get his attention, especially a young girl who was loved most when not disruptive to his brooding thoughts.
Vreeland begins the book with Cornelius and then steadily takes us back in time with the painting. The people that swirl around the painting are brought to life and the influence of having something so beautiful gracing their lives shows the greedy need we all have to possess something so alluring. One of my favorite stories is of a poor family trying to save their farm from a flood and in the midst of this conflict a baby is laid in their boat along with the painting with instructions to sell the artwork to feed the baby. The painting becomes a source of tension between the husband and wife. The wife doing anything she can to keep it. The husband, thinking of the winters to come, knows the money from selling it will allow him to expand his breeding stock which will better insure the family's long term survival. The wife becomes rebellious, but her mother sets her straight.
”Work is love made plain, whether man’s or woman’s work, and you’re a fool if you can’t recognize it. The child’s the blessing, Saskia, not the painting.�
When she does finally sell the painting I could feel the pain of the loss as acutely as does Saskia. There is nothing she will ever be able to buy for the rest of her life that will replace the vibrancy of a Vermeer painting. She does leave her mark on the painting because she names it and she passes that name to the buyer.
Morningshine.
In the later chapters we even meet Vermeer as he struggles with creditors and subjects for art that will inspire him to lift his brush. We meet the mutinous Magdalena as she struggles against the forces trying to make her learn the skills that will make her a valuable housewife. How can you mend when you must create? In the final chapter we see her meeting her painting once again. She borrows every scrap of money she can to try and buy it when it comes up for auction, but paintings like that aren’t supposed to be owned by normal people, not even a person who has the blood of the painter cycling through her own heart.
It is always so ironic to think of painters giving away paintings for a loaf of bread and a few decades/centuries later those same works of art becoming worth inconceivable amounts of money.
The book gets better and better as we walk back through history with Vreeland. The later chapters are stellar, poignant, and captivating. They lift the book from a three star to a four star. The author put me in the same room as Vermeer, so much so I could almost see the light the way he saw it.
Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window by Vermeer.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Girl in Hyacinth Blue.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 30, 2014
–
Started Reading
August 30, 2014
– Shelved
August 31, 2014
–
Finished Reading
February 9, 2015
– Shelved as:
the-dutch
Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(last edited Sep 03, 2014 02:25PM)
(new)
Sep 03, 2014 02:25PM
That was really interesting, thank you Jeffrey, and so well written. The Vermeer self-portrait gave me shivers--I've seen paintings that are more realistic, even photographic, but wow, that one gives you a real sense of him. I felt like he could see me. Marvellous but unnerving. Anyway, fascinating review as always, it was like a little novel in itself. :-)
reply
|
flag

Thanks Lauren! I too thought that self-portrait was so compelling. I would have recognized him walking down the street. Your kind words have put a smile on my face. :-)

When you become a gazillionaire buy The Geographer to go with The Astronomer. They are a matching pair. :-) Thanks Maria! Nothing like Vermeer to make me go a little crazy adding pics.


When you become a gazillionaire buy The Geographer ..."
Both amazing!!! I'm glad we can, at least, delight ourselves via Internet with these masterpieces! :)

Both spouses are absolutely right. In many ways both are being practical, him seemingly more so, but at the same time she knows to sell something so beautiful, so unattainable again, diminishes her life more than she can explain.
Ahh yes The Girl with the Pearl Earring. It is beautiful and a canvas copy of it hangs on a wall in my house, but I used the opportunity to show other Vermeers maybe ones most people have never seen. I enjoyed the movie with Scarlett Johansson as well and need to rewatch it...maybe a read the book/watch the movie review.
Vermeer's dazzle me as do your insightful comments.


Heh, funny you envisioned Scarlett and I pictured Colin Firth! :) T.Chevalier's novel is slowly paced but written with finesse, it's quiet and deep sort of like Vermeer's paintings.


Is Vreeland's story a complete fiction, Jeffrey, or is it based on something factual as was Chevalier's?

Her new book [book:Lisette's List looks really good, tempting for sure. I decided to read one of her books already on my shelf before making a decision about her latest offering. I'm certainly looking forward to reading more of her books.
I'm pleased that you liked this one Sir Michael. I've had messages from people referring to my "article" instead of my review. I may be stretching the bounds of what most people consider to be a "review". Your praise adds strength to my tapping fingers as I consider my next review/article. :-)
I've got a copy of the book and the movie on the way so within the next few weeks I'll tackle Girl With a Pearl Earring. As always thanks for the encouragement!

Thank you so much Caroline! It pleases me to no end to know that I did inspire you to gaze upon the wonders that are Vermeers. I hope you grow to love his work as much as I do. :-)

Thanks Marita! Have you read any other Vreeland books?

I included the Janson on purpose just so everyone could see the contrast. There is just a lack of depth and definition in the Janson that is so prevalent in the Vermeers. I look at her face and she looks like a doll where the faces in the Vermeers are very much alive. Even just the folds in the wrap of the Janson girl lack that something, something. (I'm not an art critic so the jargon escapes me. :-))
As far as I know this story is a fabrication. I'm sure based on numerous stories about the lives of paintings. There is a later chapter where she really brought Vermeer to life for me.
Thanks for pointing out the Janson. I was waiting to see how people reacted to the contrast.


It is certainly a different structure. If you like linear stories you will have to convince yourself it is still linear just backwards. :-)


Thanks Margitte! I have a canvas print of Girl With a Pearl Earring hanging over my stairway. It is mesmerizing and I never tire of looking at it. Vermeer has always been one of my favorite painters.

Such lyrical eloquence! Jeffrey, your writing is impeccably splendid and it amazes me all the time. A wondrous array of art you have lined up in this review. Thank you as always :)

You are welcome Praj! I'm so pleased whenever I can impress one of the finest writers on GR. Thank you for your kind words!

Thank you Ivonne! At first glance the Janson looks like a Vermeer, but then when you look closer it lacks the glow, that Vermeer touch, that make his paintings so breathtaking.

This is absolutely heartbreaking. Jeffrey, why does it work this way?
Wonderful review that certainly made me want to read this. I remember reading not long ago A Girl with a Pearl Earing The writing was pretty good, I even gave it 4 stars, but I was somehow left wanting more. It didn't quite work for me. Maybe this one will. And thank you so much for all the gorgeous paintings. My favourite is Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window :)


This ..."
You might watch the movie with Scarlett Johansson of The Girl with the Pearl Earring. Maybe it will help give you that something more you wanted from the book. I liked the book Girl with a Pearl Earring better than this one, but you might like this one better.
Many artists are not recognized in their lifetime. They are ahead of the sensibilities of the public and the public must catch up.
Thanks Vessey!

I really like books about art so don't be surprised to see more books along these lines showing up in my reading list for next year. Thanks Lizzy and happy reading!

I really like books about art so don't be s..."
I will check it out. Thanks! :) And thanks for the answer to my question. I'm afraid you're right. People then couldn't understand their value and now...I'm afraid that in a way this is true even today. What I mean is the theft you have mentioned. I don't think that someone who loves a painting in such a possesive, egotistical way and doesn't understand that it belongs to everyone possesses the necessary depth to truly appreciate it.

You are most welcome!

You are most welcome! Sometimes the words just flow out of my fingers the best way the first time. This review wrote like I was sliding around on silk sheets.

Is this true or was it just in this book? I really Tracy Chevalier’s interpretation of how A Girl with a Pearl Earring came to be :)
It is always so ironic to think of painters giving away paintings for a loaf of bread and a few decades/centuries later those same works of art becoming worth inconceivable amounts of money
I wonder if it’s just about people becoming smarter and more appreciative toward art with the passing of the centuries or is it also about the fact that the artist is dead? Maybe this sense of loss and of mystery makes the art more exciting?
As always, a fantastic review. I was happy to read it again and to check out those gorgeous paintings again. The Astronomer and Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window are my favourite :)