Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Fabian's Reviews > Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1036893
's review

liked it

The appearances/superficiality motif appears as early on as the first sentence in this tense, tight, but ultimately convoluted smear of a novella. Count on countenance for good & sturdy bones in a story of detection...

& yet...

Plus there are really nice framing devices on display here, a check-mark always in my book, like the letters within letters narrative, a nifty exercise, which is mighty cool. (Here, my favorite sentence from the Robert Louis Stevenson classic: "Jekyll had more than a father's interest; Hyde had more than a son's indifference." [85] Super dooper neat!)

Yet...

And then there is the fact that the main protagonists become manifested once they are uttered into existence by the status quo, the pre turn of the century Londonfolk. Rumor creates their reputations before the two, er one, ever make the center stage.

However...

I must mention that I feel as though the actual occurrence, the solved crime, what's underneath all the whispy artifices of this rudimentary detective-noir novel, is a homosexual relationship gone to extremes, to a level that's too... literary? Maybe that's a stretch. Also, I LOVE that JEKYLL sounds like jackal, as in Devil. Cute.

But

This is not worthy of the canon (!!!!). Bottom Line. Cos the whole Dual-Nature and Commingling-of-Good-and-Evil thing is overdone, stamped into the reader like some mantra that could be interpreted in many different ways and becomes, quite frankly, overly exhausted. This ain't as kitschy, or pre-kitschy-- nowhere near-- as I'd foolishly predicted. If you want something macabre AND brilliant, go to the French serial-classic "The Phantom of the Opera"!
152 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 27, 2014 – Started Reading
October 27, 2014 – Shelved
October 29, 2014 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Sean Barrs "This is not worthy of the canon" I do agree that the double motif is over done at times in the 19th century, but Stevenson was the first to have the double/dopllganger in the same physical body. This novella transgresses the form.


Fabian Bookworm Sean wrote: ""This is not worthy of the canon" I do agree that the double motif is over done at times in the 19th century, but Stevenson was the first to have the double/dopllganger in the same physical body. T..." Yes, but I do suppose the novel becomes more of an anecdote, thereby losing its novel quality. But the themes are awesome.


message 3: by Bill (new)

Bill Kupersmith I'd never doubt the canonicity (please forgive pretentious word) of a book whose very title is so deeply intwined with our culture - as with 1984, Frankenstein, Robinson Crusoe as well.


message 4: by Paul (new)

Paul Falk Well said Fabian!


message 5: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Cxazaaçaaco Sox


back to top