欧宝娱乐

Joe's Reviews > Invasion of the Body Snatchers

Invasion of the Body Snatchers by Jack Finney
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
26876584
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: sci-fi-apocalyptic

Invasion of the Body Snatchers landed in the bi-weekly fiction magazine Collier's, which published Jack Finney's story as a three-part serial over consecutive issues beginning in November 1954. Finney had already seen thirty of his short stories run in Good Housekeeping or Collier's, but the response to what was at that time titled The Body Snatchers was huge. At no point since has the "pod person" not been a part of our vernacular, with four feature films and countless spoofs and homages to remind each generation.

Finney's source material bears passing resemblance to the classic B-movie directed by Don Siegel and distributed by the Allied Artists Picture Corporation in 1956. In a small Northern Californian town, twenty-eight year old general practitioner Dr. Miles Bennell is reunited with a close friend, Becky Driscoll, who's returned to town following her divorce. Though mutually attracted to each other, Becky's visit to Miles is not purely social. She's come to ask him to see her cousin Wilma Lentz, who's suffering a delusion that her Uncle Ira is an imposter who only looks like her uncle.

Says Wilma, "Miles, he looks, sounds, acts, and remembers exactly like Ira. On the outside. But inside he's different. His responses"--she stopped, hunting for the word--"aren't emotionally right, if I can explain that. He remembers the past, in detail, and he'll smile and say, 'You were sure a cute youngster, Willy. Bright one, too,' just the way Uncle Ira did. But there's something missing, and the same thing is true of Aunt Aleda, lately."

Miles refers Wilma to his colleague, psychiatrist Manfred Kaufman. Mannie confides that nine patients have come to him with fears of loved ones who are imposters; his opinion is that none of these patients are suffering from neuroses but dealing with something external and real. Miles' friend Jack Belicec, a writer, pulls Miles out of a movie theater during a date with Becky to bring him to his house, where his wife Theodora keeps watch on something Jack discovered under the basement stairs.

The strange corpse, which the Belicecs have laid out on a billiard table, shows no wounds or signs of death. It has no scar tissue and Miles notes the face looks ... vague. He also determines the corpse has no fingerprints. Connecting the corpse with the imposter stories spreading through town, Miles suggests that Theodora keep watch on the body while her husband sleeps, waking him if she notices any changes in the corpse. Miles returns home, falls asleep and is wakened by Jack & Theodora, who fled their home in terror with the answer Miles was afraid of.

Realizing that Becky might be in danger, Miles dashes to her home, where she lives with her father. Breaking into their basement and poking around with a pen light, he sees nothing out of the ordinary, at first. Then Miles opens a pair of cupboards.

There it lay, on that unpainted pine shelf, flat on its back, eyes wide open, arms motionless at its sides; and I got down on my knees beside it. I think it must actually be possible to lose your mind in an instant, and that perhaps I came very close to it. And now I knew why Theodora Belicec lay on a bed in my house in a state of drugged shock, and I closed my eyes tight, fighting to hold on to control myself. Then I opened them again and looked, holding my mind, by sheer force, in a state of cold and artificial calm.

Miles runs upstairs, grabs Becky and before she even wakes up, has carried her halfway to his house. Miles phones Mannie, but when he returns to the Belicec's basement with Jack, the corpse has disappeared. The psychiatrist launches into a measured thesis of what the men might be experiencing: mass delusion, latching onto the story circulating through town about "imposters" and seeing exactly what their imaginations expected to see in those basements. Later, Miles realizes that mass delusion doesn't account for the blank fingerprints, or the fact that the Mannie he knows never used to make his mind up so quickly.

Miles and his friends determine that the seed pods popping up in basements first appeared near a farm outside of town, visitors from outer space, of course. Confronted by one of the imposters, they learn that the pods are a desperate form of parasite, traveling across the universe on light energy. They seek new worlds to thrive in, absorbing the atomic particles of their hosts and their memories while they're most vulnerable, during sleep, reducing the hosts to dust with a perfect imitation, perfect except for emotion or free will.

Finney retooled his three-part magazine serial twice, first as a novel published in 1955 (as The Body Snatchers) and again in 1978, to take advantage of a major motion picture being released by United Artists. The version I read was the '78. Finney made changes here, altering the title to Invasion of the Body Snatchers to exploit the popularity of the movies, setting the story in 1976 and updating references he felt were antiquated. He changed the name of the town from "Santa Mira" to Mill Valley, where Finney lived. The author also drops a reference to his 1970 novel Time and Again, though only fans will spot it.

I have to rate Invasion of the Body Snatchers on two scales, the legacy of the material and the material itself. As legacy, this is five stars. Finney always maintained he wanted to write a good read and nothing more, but like a magic mirror, his story has the power to morph into a commentary on whatever cultural or social conformity is in the air. In the '50s, it was the threat of Communism, or Red hysteria running rampant the United States. In the '70s, there was urban malaise and Me Decade pop psychiatry to be wary of. Today, political correctness or technology might indicate pod activity.

As a story, this is three stars at best. Even Finney's retooled 1978 version is exactly what it always was: a magazine serial published in 1954. Becky Driscoll is little more than a doll and frequently appraised by the well-intentioned and gentlemanly Miles by her physical attributes only. She's an accessory to the protagonist and almost seems like a pod person herself. There is a mildly eerie vibe throughout, but Finney lets off the gas too often when it comes to suspense. The plot lists, and much about the biology of the seed pods and their dispersal doesn't make a lot of sense.

Without giving much away, Finney's source material lacks the doomsday pulse of the 1956 and 1978 film versions. As such, the writing feels far more disposable. I'm enamored by Finney's wild imagination and how his tale has spread like ivy over the last sixty years, but would mostly recommend the novel to the author's fans. The 1978 film version directed by Philip Kaufman that relocated the action to San Francisco with Donald Sutherland, Brooke Adams, Jeff Goldblum, Veronica Cartwright and Leonard Nimoy is the definite version of this material: offbeat, intensely creepy and monumentally tragic.
46 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

November 20, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
November 20, 2014 – Shelved
January 4, 2015 – Started Reading
January 4, 2015 –
page 24
10.71% "Next morning when I got to my office, a patient was waiting, a quiet little woman in her forties who sat in the leather chair in front of my desk, hands folded in her lap over her purse, and told me she was perfectly sure her husband wasn't her husband at all. Her voice calm, she said he looked, talked, and acted exactly the way her husband always had--but that it simply wasn't him."
January 5, 2015 –
page 50
22.32% "In my father's day, a night operator, whose name he'd have known, could have told him who'd called. But now we have dial phones, marvelously efficient, saving you a full second or more every time you call, inhumanely perfect, and utterly brainless; and none of them will remember where the doctor is at night, when a child is sick and needs him. Sometimes I think we're refining all humanity out of our lives."
January 6, 2015 –
page 119
53.13% "There on that shelf lay Becky Driscoll--uncompleted. They lay a ... preliminary sketch for what was to become a perfect and flawless portrait, everything begun, all sketched in, nothing entirely finished. Or say it this way: there in that dim orange light lay a blurred face, seen vaguely, as through layers of water, and yet--recognizable in every least feature."
January 6, 2015 –
page 158
70.54% "Gray-haired Miss Weygand, who twenty years ago had loaned me the first copy of Huckleberry Finn I ever read, looked at me, her face going wooden and blank, with an utterly cold and pitiless alienness. There was nothing there now, in that gaze, nothing in common with me; a fish in the sea had more kinship with me than this staring thing before me."
January 6, 2015 – Shelved as: sci-fi-apocalyptic
January 6, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Carmen (new) - added it

Carmen Great review, Joseph. It really is a classic. And I watched the film on your recommendation, of course. ;)


Kandice Which film? I prefer the version with Donald Sutherland and Leonard Nimoy.


message 3: by Carmen (new) - added it

Carmen Yes, that's the one.


Kandice Carmen wrote: "Yes, that's the one."
The end is one of the creepiest scenes ever! Talk about an image burned on your retinas.


message 5: by Licha (new)

Licha Great breakdown Joe. I'm glad you included the films in comparison to the book.


message 6: by Joe (last edited Jan 07, 2015 11:38AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Joe Carmen wrote: "Great review, Joseph. It really is a classic. And I watched the film on your recommendation, of course. ;)"

Yes, you were such a sport to watch a creepy movie on my recommendation, Carmen. Donald Sutherland's hairstyle alone is a bit discomforting.

Kandice wrote: "The end is one of the creepiest scenes ever! Talk about an image burned on your retinas."

The 1978 version doesn't alternate between black humor and terror so much as it juggles both throughout every scene. I also love Veronica Cartwright in this movie. Her character has read all the '70s books on unexplained phenomena like Chariots of the Gods and is ready when the invasion begins! How she stays awake without Starbucks though is a true mystery.

Licha wrote: "Great breakdown Joe. I'm glad you included the films in comparison to the book."

Thanks, Licha. Body Snatchers (1993) has some interesting casting but is too downbeat, like director Abel Ferrara got talked into making a science fiction movie when he really wanted to do something else. I never saw The Invasion (2007) which was meddled with incessantly, taken away from the director and made by committee.


message 7: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl Your review was as much a thrill as the book, Joe. For a minute there, you had me keeping up with Miles, wondering what he was doing or finding next. I haven't read the book, but I have seen parts of the film version though. Somehow, I never get through all of it. I probably should try now that you've written such an enthusiastic review of the book.


message 8: by Joe (new) - rated it 4 stars

Joe Cheryl wrote: "I haven't read the book, but I have seen parts of the film version though. Somehow, I never get through all of it. I probably should try now that you've written such an enthusiastic review of the book.

Thank you for reading and paying my review such a high compliment, Cheryl! If you haven't been able to get all the way through a viewing of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, I'm thinking you're falling asleep. They get you when you sleep. Hmmmm. I'll keep my eyes peeled for suspicious behavior. I highly recommend to you the 1978 film version, which I think is one of the key films of '70s cinema.


message 9: by Licha (new)

Licha The 2007 version was terrible. I'm not a big fan of Nicole Kidman but they got her deadpan look correct for the casting.


message 10: by Leah (new)

Leah Polcar Great review and wonderful comparison to the films. The 1978 movie, which still gives me bad dreams, has always been my reference, not the novel, and given your review I will probably not read the book since it seems the movie has all plot and atmosphere I need. Also, while sometimes find 50s-60s books rather hilarious (e.g. Ian Fleming's Bond series), they do sometimes lack sensitivity to women's issues, so I may let this one pass by.


message 11: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad Excellent review, just finished this book. Was going to review it, but yours pretty well sums up what I thought as well. Want to go back and watch the 1978 movie now, too.


message 12: by Bruce (new)

Bruce Delaplain I read the Collier's serial when it came out. Scared the pants off me! I was about 11 years old.

I just reread Philip K. Dick's "The Father-Thing." It's an almost identical depiction of aliens. It was published in Fantasy & Science Fiction in December 1954. And according to a previous comment, The Body Snatchers serial began in November 1954. So I guess it's just coincidence how alike they are.


message 13: by Julie (new) - added it

Julie G I should have known that you'd read this. I had just mentioned to Robin that I got a copy of Robert Louis Stevenson's "The Body Snatchers" and I wondered if it was the source material for the movie. She let me know today that the film was based on this book.
Do you think I'd like this one?


message 14: by Joe (last edited Jan 16, 2021 04:18PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Joe Julie wrote: "I should have known that you'd read this. I had just mentioned to Robin that I got a copy of Robert Louis Stevenson's "The Body Snatchers" and I wondered if it was the source material for the movie. She let me know today that the film was based on this book.
Do you think I'd like this one?"


I'd seen three of the four movies prior to reading this material, but am a fan of Jack Finney's and can vouch for him as a good writer. Science fiction is populated with stories of aliens who seek to absorb us into a shared consciousness and whether that would be a bad thing. No more war, no more crime, no more racism. There's John Carpenter's The Thing and the Borg from Star Trek. Even zombies. The question is whether a collective is preferable to free will. I find that question gets down to what it means to be human.


message 15: by Julie (last edited Jan 16, 2021 04:18PM) (new) - added it

Julie G JV,
Your comment didn't help me at all!


back to top