ŷ

emma's Reviews > The Time Traveler's Wife

The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
32879029
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: non-ya, romance, unpopular-opinion, nope, sci-fi, contemporary, 1-star, reviewed
Read 2 times. Last read January 29, 2022 to January 31, 2022.

Life has approximately four perfect things in it.

One of them is Cake With Fresh Strawberries.

Another of them is Running Errands And Getting Yourself A Little Treat.

The third one is Going To A Body Of Water On A Hot Day And Swimming Until You're Very Tired And Then Air-Drying In The Sun.

And the fourth one is Time Travel Romance.

The two best rom-coms on earth (and I have seen many of them, in a misguided attempt to cure myself of emotionlessness) are About Time and Safety Not Guaranteed.

Both are quirky, funny romantic comedies with lovable main characters that kind of ignores the science of time travel in order to focus on a love story. And they are perfect movies.

So, by the same logic, I should have liked this book. AT LEAST liked. If the world was fair and just and rational, I would have loved it and given it five stars and tattooed the manuscript in a full-back tattoo to rival Ben Affleck's.

But this book was not:
- funny
- quirky
- romantic
- compelling
- populated by lovable characters.

It was:
- the kind of sad that feels like a trick
- centered around the worst romance I have ever read
- bizarrely outdated considering it's literally from the 2000s

I spend my entire life on this website and am addicted to my reading challenge, but when I was finished this book I was so overwhelmed by relief / plans to gather all copies I could find in one place in order to heckle them that I didn't mark it as read for days.

It was just that bad.

In case you are one of the few people who has had the fortune of never even hearing about this book, we follow Clare (a normal girl, if pretentiousness and perfect hair and weird art qualify as "normal") and Henry (a time traveler, de facto sex addict, and all around asshole).

The first halfish of this book follows Henry's time travels to Clare when she is...a child. At this point, Henry knows Clare (he is married to adult her), but Clare doesn't know Henry (she is MERE MONTHS OUT OF TODDLERDOM).

This section includes such fun as a little girl seeing a grown man naked, and a teenage girl who tries (successfully, eventually) to seduce a nearly 40 year old man because she has been groomed by him for her entire memorable life.

It's so funny when you consider that the author could have just...not done this. She opted into this kind of moral disturbance.

The second half(ish) occurs when a young(ish) (but still significantly older than Clare) Henry meets Clare for the first time. He doesn't know who she is, but she is like YOU'RE MY HUSBAND. And then they have to date.

In other words, the first half of this romance is Henry being in love with Clare when Clare is not in love with Henry and then the second vice versa.

In other other words, these people never CHOOSE EACH OTHER!!! It's grooming and then whatever the equivalent of grooming is for grownups!

It's gross and worst of all, it's boring.

And it doesn't get better. There is supposed to be some sort of "honeymoon period" here, which is kind of nonexistent if you like the falling in love part of romance (aka, romance itself) or are not into pedophilia (we're in the wrong place, folks), but very quickly Clare is very unhappy because Henry is never there and Henry is very unhappy because Clare is mean when he is, and he is generally more pleased with life when he is forcibly committing sex acts with Clare before she hits the age of consent. (I am not making this up. I'm barely even being dramatic.)

But then (view spoiler).

Sad stories are like a trick to me at the best of times - all art that is intended to make you feel a certain way is fundamentally emotional manipulation, and more power to em but when it doesn't work it's just awkward.

This one is even sillier because these people aren't happy enough or interesting enough for their lives to be ruined, or for that ruination to inspire any sort of feeling in me. Beyond

This is the story of a woman who builds her entire life around a man who is by definition barely there, and then once he isn't there at all she continues to live a shell of an existence. In spite of (view spoiler)

If Clare ever lived a full life for herself, following passions or doing anything interesting at all, I might have had more complicated feelings about this. But instead she lives for more than forty years still waiting for Henry, (view spoiler) so I can just hate it.

At least my feelings can be straightforward. That's the one upside.

This does have the kind of beautiful overwrought writing that I can get behind even as I know it's silly, but also I can't stress enough that you will not understand how different 2003 is from current day until you immerse yourself in the way we talked and treated each other in 2003.

I'm saying "we" like I wasn't 6 at the time, but still.

This was an all around nightmare.

Bottom line: So grateful I was 6 then. Books are so much better now.

----------------
pre-review

i truly cannot stress enough that i spend every moment of my life on this website.

so if i forget to mark a book as read, that is a bad sign of miraculous proportions.

review to come / 1 star

----------------
tbr review

sometimes i like to pretend i'm in a suburban club from 15 years ago. it's like meditation for me
515 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Time Traveler's Wife.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 25, 2014 – Shelved
June 11, 2015 – Started Reading
June 12, 2015 –
page 342
55.61%
June 12, 2015 – Finished Reading
January 29, 2022 – Started Reading
January 31, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 77 (77 new)


message 1: by Allen (new) - added it

Allen Barber I read this YEARS ago and remember enjoying it. Or, rather, not hating it. My love of time travel stories may be coloring my memory. Do you think it's worth a re-read?


Jasmijn Zielman Ah yes I love this one! Hope you’ll enjoy it too


message 3: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Allen wrote: "I read this YEARS ago and remember enjoying it. Or, rather, not hating it. My love of time travel stories may be coloring my memory. Do you think it's worth a re-read?"

thus far: no............


message 4: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Jasmijn wrote: "Ah yes I love this one! Hope you’ll enjoy it too"

i hope so!


message 5: by Tanya (new)

Tanya Don't hate me for asking, but is the book better than the movie?


✨ Syakira Azam ✨ At first, I rated it 4 stars bcs of the sobbing I had while reading it. Then, I rated it 3 stars bcs come to think of it, the writing is just meh. Now I agree that 2 stars is enough.


Nusfaq Mahmood Ohmygawd, I hated this book so much. I had really high expectations as people keep talking about how gorgeous they find it. But I cannot shake off how odd and disturbing it made me about the whole sexualizing-your-wife-at-her-teen-years-even-though-she-is-going-to-end-up-being-your-wife trope. 1 star was the deal for me. Even the author seemed confused from time to time! 🥴


message 8: by Jeannine (new)

Jeannine I hate to be a pessimist, but I think some publishers use a formulaic name (the ___ wife) to get people to think a book is going to be as good as another the ___ wife book.


message 9: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Tanya wrote: "Don't hate me for asking, but is the book better than the movie?"

have never seen the movie!


message 10: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Syakira wrote: "At first, I rated it 4 stars bcs of the sobbing I had while reading it. Then, I rated it 3 stars bcs come to think of it, the writing is just meh. Now I agree that 2 stars is enough."

the last time i read it i know i rated it higher bc sadness tricks me. not this time!!!


message 11: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Nusfaq wrote: "Ohmygawd, I hated this book so much. I had really high expectations as people keep talking about how gorgeous they find it. But I cannot shake off how odd and disturbing it made me about the whole ..."

honestly i'm not sure this will even stay at 2 for me


message 12: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Charlottesville Bookworm Jeannine wrote: "I hate to be a pessimist, but I think some publishers use a formulaic name (the ___ wife) to get people to think a book is going to be as good as another the ___ wife book."

the formulaic names are truly becoming devastating


message 13: by Tanya (new)

Tanya emma wrote: "Tanya wrote: "Don't hate me for asking, but is the book better than the movie?"

have never seen the movie!"


I liked the movie, thats why I was wondering. No teenaged sexual ogling in my recollection


message 14: by Hannah (new)

Hannah I haven’t read the book but I remember seeing the movie and being weirded out by the whole concept.


message 15: by Carous (new) - added it

Carous You hit the nail there. Henry groomed Clare and was a sex addict. I was astonished when I read this book and not every single review said that. What the hell is wrong with the author? (Also Henry was horrible to his ex- girlfriends that weren't Clare)


message 16: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Hannah wrote: "I haven’t read the book but I remember seeing the movie and being weirded out by the whole concept."

it is very weird regardless of medium!


message 17: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Carous wrote: "You hit the nail there. Henry groomed Clare and was a sex addict. I was astonished when I read this book and not every single review said that. What the hell is wrong with the author? (Also Henry w..."

dude yes! a misogynistic selfish pedophilic asshole with various addiction problems and a tendency to manipulate? what a dreamboat


Rachel A Your reaction to this book really makes me laugh. I totally hear your points around grooming and they are so valid. It was like when I showed my 11-year old daughter Beetlejuice and she wad horrified by his sexual assault, which was only funny when I was a kid. Similarly, I didn't even think of it in the terms you mentioned, until you mentioned it. It is good you see it that way! The book was meh regardless but I appreciate the perspective.


message 19: by Riley (new) - added it

Riley Anne Thank you for somehow encapsulating all of my long-forgotten grievances against this book. So many people loved it. So many people thought it was sooo romantic. This has been perplexing me for YEARS. At the very least, I now know that I’m not alone. Thank you for your service.


message 20: by Kora (new)

Kora Kaos I only remember that I hated this book when I read it... But I could not put a finger on the Why. Thank you for phrasing it so perfectly!


Sarah I read this SO long ago and just loved it, but I'm pretty sure that means I was an idiot. Because later I read another book by this author and it was appalling. Just so gross, with really icky inappropriate sexuality. So thank you for explaining what was wrong with this book and saving me from a brutal re-read.


Sherrelle at 15 I loved this book, at 28 I can't stand it because of the grooming. We're taught as young women it's romantic when an older man pursues us. It's so damaging, as we can see by Clare basically not having a life after being molded by Henry.


message 23: by Stasi (new) - rated it 1 star

Stasi I was leaning towards giving up on this book because I could already tell it was heading to the places you mention. Thank you for saving me from the trip.


Becca Smith YES! People are so defensive of this book which is also weird to me. But the GROOMING. And the chapter where she loses her virginity, I was straight up appalled and frankly grossed out. He’s 41! And even though he waits til she’s 18, its mentioned a few times that she turns him on at practically any age. Gross gross gross.


Wewerecreatures Thank you so much for mentioning the grooming! This book was so triggering for me that by that gross chapter where Henry takes her virginity I had to put it down for good, it’s not even a good enough book to justify finishing. I was so shocked by the lack of reviews that mention the grooming since it’s the most prominent part of the plot but the even author fails to see what’s wrong with the hideous “love story� she’s created. Henry is an abuser and a groomer and this book stinks.


message 26: by Donna (new) - rated it 1 star

Donna This. I know so many people who “adore how Clare and Henry fall in love�. They do not fall in love. He’s a creepy stranger who grooms a child and she barges into his life and tells him they’re married and that’s that. If she didn’t tell him they were married because he told her they were married they wouldn’t be married. And I don’t care how many pairs of Doc Marten’s he has or how many Violent Femmes songs he loves; he’s a poser. A creepy, shallow, icky poser with a pretentious wife, awful friends, and considering he’s more temporally unstuck than Billy Pilgrim, never finds five minutes to do anything remotely interesting that isn’t sickening.


Martha Thank you so much for addressing the grooming in the book. I thought it was super problematic and I can't understand why or how people just ignore this and they even made a movie out of this story!!


message 28: by Mona (new) - rated it 1 star

Mona Thank God I am not the only one having a bad feeling about the "romance" between them. It's disgusting how he's grooming her.


Sandra These were my exact thoughts. Every time he was sexualizing her as a child I was like... they're married? ... But they're not.... But they are...? It just was completely unnecessary and disgusting.


message 30: by Francesca (new)

Francesca Pashby Goodness, you've made me want to reread this somewhat urgently (as I believe I 'enjoyed' it back in the day), but what will probably happen is I will get sidetracked by some biscuits or something ...


message 31: by [deleted user] (new)

Huh. I loved this book when I read it back in the early 2000s. I was in high school at the time (I graduated in 2004). It is still on my shelf because I remember liking it so much. In the past year or so, my partner and I every so often discuss how freaking toxic the popular preppy culture was when we were in high school. (I mean, there are so many great things about the late 1990s and early 2000s too...but you only have to watch documentaries about Woodstock 99 to realize everything that was different then and so inappropriate now). For goodness sake, my friends and I had a competition called Slap A$$ Friday every Friday where the boys were against the girls and we would see which side could give the other the, well, most slaps on the butt throughout the school day. Yes we all consented to it, but still!!!! We thought it was funny at the time, but man...students would not get away with that in school now (and I know, I'm a teacher). My TBR is way too big right now, but eventually I want to do a bunch of rereads to see how I think now compared to then.


message 32: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Ashley wrote: "Huh. I loved this book when I read it back in the early 2000s. I was in high school at the time (I graduated in 2004). It is still on my shelf because I remember liking it so much. In the past year..."

i totally feel you about wanting to do a bunch of rereads � every few years i'm tempted to revisit my favorites from years before to see if they hold up. books are a part of their era!!! impossible to keep our every opinion and review timely, however much we may want to


message 33: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Francesca wrote: "Goodness, you've made me want to reread this somewhat urgently (as I believe I 'enjoyed' it back in the day), but what will probably happen is I will get sidetracked by some biscuits or something ..."

biscuits would be better.


message 34: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Sandra wrote: "These were my exact thoughts. Every time he was sexualizing her as a child I was like... they're married? ... But they're not.... But they are...? It just was completely unnecessary and disgusting."

it is truly hilarious to remember that the author just...didn't have to do that


message 35: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Mona wrote: "Thank God I am not the only one having a bad feeling about the "romance" between them. It's disgusting how he's grooming her."

nasty nasty


message 36: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Martha wrote: "Thank you so much for addressing the grooming in the book. I thought it was super problematic and I can't understand why or how people just ignore this and they even made a movie out of this story!!"

very bizarre stuff!


message 37: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Donna wrote: "This. I know so many people who “adore how Clare and Henry fall in love�. They do not fall in love. He’s a creepy stranger who grooms a child and she barges into his life and tells him they’re marr..."

this comment gets at this book's most unforgivable crime: these characters are annoying!!!


message 38: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Wewerecreatures wrote: "Thank you so much for mentioning the grooming! This book was so triggering for me that by that gross chapter where Henry takes her virginity I had to put it down for good, it’s not even a good enou..."

it is so completely bizarre as a writing choice, i cannot wrap my mind around it


message 39: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Becca wrote: "YES! People are so defensive of this book which is also weird to me. But the GROOMING. And the chapter where she loses her virginity, I was straight up appalled and frankly grossed out. He’s 41! An..."

so true...the entire leadup to her 18th being how sexy she is as a teenager to his old ass self is completely nasty


message 40: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Stasi wrote: "I was leaning towards giving up on this book because I could already tell it was heading to the places you mention. Thank you for saving me from the trip."

counting this as my good deed for the day


message 41: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Sherrelle wrote: "at 15 I loved this book, at 28 I can't stand it because of the grooming. We're taught as young women it's romantic when an older man pursues us. It's so damaging, as we can see by Clare basically n..."

we really are!!! i read this at a younger age and didn't adore it but definitely found it romantic. a reread at 24 was revolting


message 42: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Sarah wrote: "I read this SO long ago and just loved it, but I'm pretty sure that means I was an idiot. Because later I read another book by this author and it was appalling. Just so gross, with really icky inap..."

very glad this book will not enter your reread echelons!


message 43: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Kora wrote: "I only remember that I hated this book when I read it... But I could not put a finger on the Why. Thank you for phrasing it so perfectly!"

when it comes to talking about things that i hate, it is always a pleasure


message 44: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Riley wrote: "Thank you for somehow encapsulating all of my long-forgotten grievances against this book. So many people loved it. So many people thought it was sooo romantic. This has been perplexing me for YEAR..."

anytime!!!


message 45: by Danielle (new) - added it

Danielle Victoria I probably would've never read this book regardless, but thank you for possibly sparing me because now I will for sure never, ever read it. Usually when people are all "omg you have to read this book!!" I usually run for the hills, because 💁‍♀️💁‍♀� I do not have the same reading taste as these Philistines. Haha. But for real, if someone isn't a big reader, and they only read this one book or series bc it was sooo popular, it's pretty much a guarantee I will hate it. And when it comes to this book, there is apparently plenty to hate. I hate the weird grooming and I'm wondering like, where tf were her parents?! Was this Henry guy all, "hey guys. Don't worry. I promise this all okay because in the future we end up married!" 🙄🙄 ...like, okay mister crazy man, we'd like you to leave now.. and even more I hate the fact that she wastes her life waiting for this guy who isn't even a good man, instead of following her own dreams and passions and forging her own path. It sounds like she just sits around waiting for him, like she's the modern version of Odysseus's wife, while he's off gallivanting wherever. Girl, no. 🙅‍♀�

So anyway. Long story short, thank you!


message 46: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Xu which two rom-coms are you referring to? id like to watch them


message 47: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Sarah wrote: "which two rom-coms are you referring to? id like to watch them"

their names are in the review! about time and safety not guaranteed


message 48: by emma (new) - rated it 1 star

emma Danielle wrote: "I probably would've never read this book regardless, but thank you for possibly sparing me because now I will for sure never, ever read it. Usually when people are all "omg you have to read this bo..."

she kept going to this bigass meadow and i guess her parents, like. just didn't care that she was out there? even though she was like 4 at one point? who knows


message 49: by anna (new)

anna You write so many bad reviews on books that I can't tell if you actually don't like the book or if you're joking 😭


Rachel I read this book like 15 years ago, when it was newish. I hated it. I am not surprised that it hasn't aged well.


« previous 1
back to top