Ilse's Reviews > The Moor's Last Sigh
The Moor's Last Sigh
by
by

If love is not all, then it is nothing: this principle, and its opposite (I mean, infidelity), collide down all the years of my breathless tale.
And breath-taking it was, this epic saga on the rise, thriving and fall of four generations of an eccentric, wealthy Indian family - at least, such is the imprint the novel left on me, having read it about twenty years ago.
Deception, hatred, revenge and murder are the ingredients of an exhilarating story ultimately revolving around love: scorching pepper love, motherly love, love of beauty and art (one of the characters, Aurora Zogoiby, is inspired by the painter Amrita Sher-Gil). Like in Midnight's Children and Shame, Rushdie emerges as a fabulous storyteller, sailing airily on the waves of his powerful imagination and wit when interweaving the fortunes of the da Gama-Zogoiby families with twentieth century Indian history and religious issues (Partition, Hindu nationalism), blending fiction and real historical events.
I wanted to cling to the image of love as the blending of spirits, as mélange, as the triumph of the impure, mongrel, conjoining best of us over what there is in us of the solitary, the isolated, the austere, the dogmatic, the pure; of love as democracy, as the victory of the no-man-is-an-island, two’s-company Many over the clean, mean, apartheiding Ones. I tried to see lovelessness as arrogance, for who but the loveless could believe themselves complete, all-seeing, all-wise? To love is to lose omnipotence and omniscience. Ignorantly is how we all fall in love; for it is a kind of fall. Closing our eyes, we leap from that cliff in hope of a soft landing. Nor is it always soft; but still, I told myself, still, without that leap nobody comes to life. The leap itself is a birth, even when it ends in death, in a scramble for white tablets, and the scent of bitter almonds on your beloved’s breathless mouth.
The vigorous narrative pace, the kaleidoscopic range, the alluring settings (Cochin, Bombay, Spain) and Rushdie’s characteristic style and prose (almost baroque, surrealistic, fast, dancing forwards, recoiling, tiptoeing sideways, digressing, almost baroque, coloured with word play and amusing references to film, music and literature) left me bedazzled and somewhat word-enebriated. Though the story lines and the many characters have mostly faded, I remember my younger self adored the flavour of Salman Rushdie’s writing, wondering now if the more mature reader self still would be enraptured by his spicy exuberance.
Als liefde niet alles is, dan is ze niets.
Bedrog, haat, wraak en moord vormen de ingrediënten van een spannend verhaal waarin alles uiteindelijk om de liefde draait: verzengende peperliefde, moederliefde, liefde voor schoonheid en kunst. Rushdie is een rasverteller met een uitzonderlijk rijke verbeelding. Luchtig en spitsvondig verweeft hij de lotgevallen van de families Da Gama en Zogoiby met de Indiase geschiedenis en religieuze kwesties. Rushdies taal is zwierig, bijna barok en krioelt van woordspelletjes en persiflerende verwijzingen naar film, muziek en literatuur. Een wervelend boek dat je onderdompelt in een heel eigen wereld.
And breath-taking it was, this epic saga on the rise, thriving and fall of four generations of an eccentric, wealthy Indian family - at least, such is the imprint the novel left on me, having read it about twenty years ago.
Deception, hatred, revenge and murder are the ingredients of an exhilarating story ultimately revolving around love: scorching pepper love, motherly love, love of beauty and art (one of the characters, Aurora Zogoiby, is inspired by the painter Amrita Sher-Gil). Like in Midnight's Children and Shame, Rushdie emerges as a fabulous storyteller, sailing airily on the waves of his powerful imagination and wit when interweaving the fortunes of the da Gama-Zogoiby families with twentieth century Indian history and religious issues (Partition, Hindu nationalism), blending fiction and real historical events.
I wanted to cling to the image of love as the blending of spirits, as mélange, as the triumph of the impure, mongrel, conjoining best of us over what there is in us of the solitary, the isolated, the austere, the dogmatic, the pure; of love as democracy, as the victory of the no-man-is-an-island, two’s-company Many over the clean, mean, apartheiding Ones. I tried to see lovelessness as arrogance, for who but the loveless could believe themselves complete, all-seeing, all-wise? To love is to lose omnipotence and omniscience. Ignorantly is how we all fall in love; for it is a kind of fall. Closing our eyes, we leap from that cliff in hope of a soft landing. Nor is it always soft; but still, I told myself, still, without that leap nobody comes to life. The leap itself is a birth, even when it ends in death, in a scramble for white tablets, and the scent of bitter almonds on your beloved’s breathless mouth.
The vigorous narrative pace, the kaleidoscopic range, the alluring settings (Cochin, Bombay, Spain) and Rushdie’s characteristic style and prose (almost baroque, surrealistic, fast, dancing forwards, recoiling, tiptoeing sideways, digressing, almost baroque, coloured with word play and amusing references to film, music and literature) left me bedazzled and somewhat word-enebriated. Though the story lines and the many characters have mostly faded, I remember my younger self adored the flavour of Salman Rushdie’s writing, wondering now if the more mature reader self still would be enraptured by his spicy exuberance.
Als liefde niet alles is, dan is ze niets.
Bedrog, haat, wraak en moord vormen de ingrediënten van een spannend verhaal waarin alles uiteindelijk om de liefde draait: verzengende peperliefde, moederliefde, liefde voor schoonheid en kunst. Rushdie is een rasverteller met een uitzonderlijk rijke verbeelding. Luchtig en spitsvondig verweeft hij de lotgevallen van de families Da Gama en Zogoiby met de Indiase geschiedenis en religieuze kwesties. Rushdies taal is zwierig, bijna barok en krioelt van woordspelletjes en persiflerende verwijzingen naar film, muziek en literatuur. Een wervelend boek dat je onderdompelt in een heel eigen wereld.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The Moor's Last Sigh.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
January 12, 2015
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-40 of 40 (40 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Katia
(new)
Mar 22, 2019 06:19AM

reply
|
flag



Thank you very much, Katia - it came out in 1995 as his first novel after The Satanic Verses, and I was at that time enamoured by Rushdie's novels (enhanced by a fascination for India after travelling there for about half a year), I read it as soon as I could. What I wrote here is indeed no more than an attempt to word what lasts of that long past reading experience, I didn't revisit it meanwhile, and gave up on Rushdie after 'Fury'. Today I was reflecting on authors who used to be favourites in my younger days, and the ones I would list at the moment, and I felt so guilty about probably no longer including Mr. Rushdie as a favourite that I decided to translate the few lines I wrote about this book ten years ago and add some pantings of Amrita Sher-Gil :-).


Thank you very much for stopping by and reading, Barbara - it was exactly such reflecting on how we maybe change as a reader over the years that brought Rushdie again to mind - it is almost like I have forsaken him, or seeing him now as a guilty pleasure :-) - revisiting much loved books and authors half a lifetime later feels risky - I am on the brink of doing so because my reading group picked one of my most cherished books, Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita - to be honest I don't look forward to the discussion, not so eager to hear anything less favourable about it :-).

And what is your favourite Rushdie, George? I adored Shame, thought it hilarious, Grimus I started on a bad moment and it couldn't keep my interest going (too sf for me). I felt only lukewarm on 'The Ground beneath her feet', and gave up on him after 'Fury' - so quite some more to go if I would return to him! 'I am on a fence with regard to 'Joseph Anton'...did you read that one yet?


Alhough I didn't read this book, Midnight's Children was a highlight of my reading life for years. Now you've made me wonder what I'd think of it today. But I suspect it would be better not to reread it, better to keep the memory intact.

And what is your favourit..."
My absolute favorites are his dual masterpieces Midnight's Children and The Satanic Verses. They were very influential to me as a writer and I consider them as examples of the heights literature can reach.
Rushdie admitted to flaws in Grimus. It's a first novel after all. I think I'll enjoy it, though.
The Ground Beneath Her Feet was my first Rushdie so I really loved it. I don't think I'd enjoy as much now compared to his best works, but I think it's still Rushdie in good form compared to his later work. The song that U2 made from it is pure gold.
Yeah. Fury is not very good. It has only fleeting glimmers of things I love about Rushdie's writing. If I had to pick a favorite from his later work, I'd say The Enchantress of Florence is probably his best. I have yet to read The Golden House and Shalimar the Clown.
I enjoyed Joseph Anton because I'm interested in the 'Rushdie Affair' for historical and cultural reasons that remain ever-relevant. Plus, who doesn't love drama in general? And I'm interested in Rushdie as a writer and thinker. If you're not interested in these things then I wouldn't recommend it. The most interesting part of the book was his artistic/historical explanation behind his inspiration for The Satanic Verses.
His two children's books are a delight too.
Simply put, Rushdie is a treasure.

How kind of you to say so, Leslie, thank you very much for stopping by and reading!

And now I feel like revisiting 'Midnight's Children' Lisa! I think you are right that on a second, or third read of his books one comes out wondering if it was the same book one has been reading all those years ago (I remember his wiriting that compelling I gobbled up the sentences far too hastily, maybe I would now have the discipline to slow down and savour).

So kind of you to say so, Jaline, thank you very much for stopping by and reading!


Thank you very much, Paula! Does that happen to you as well, reading reviews written by friends on books you read long ago and feeling terribly tempted to revisit them pronto?


Alhough I didn't read this book, Midnight's Children was a highlight of my reading life for years. Now you've made me wonder what I'd think of it today. But I suspect it would be better not to reread it, better to keep the memory intact."
Many thanks, Fionnuala. The paintings of Amrita Sher-Gil were quite a find, another way in which the internet has also enrichted our reading experiences. I liked Midnight's Children more than this novel, maybe because it was the first I read by him and I experienced that first exposure to his dazzling prose as quite overwhelming. Re-reading books that made such impression I think tricky as well, it might ruin the memory of them, while they now can continue to shine brightly in our mind. And yet, I might revisit Midnight's Children, if only because a few years after reading it I had the chance of travelling through India a few months, and I imagine those travel memories will also change the reading experience...

How interesting, which elements or features of these books would you consider as most influential on your own writing, George? Structure, imagination, language?
Rushdie admitted to flaws in Grimus. It's a first novel after all. I think I'll enjoy it, though.
I started it at an entirely wrong moment, not able to concentrate on reading at all (a bit like the time I read the Brothers Karamazov with concussion, also a bad idea)
The Ground Beneath Her Feet was my first Rushdie so I really loved it. I don't think I'd enjoy as much now compared to his best works, but I think it's still Rushdie in good form compared to his later work. The song that U2 made from it is pure gold.
Such to me is a delightful memory: hearing that song on the radio for the first time � and the anticipation of reading the novel � the novel was quite enjoyable, although I liked this one, The Moor’s last sigh, even better (by that time I had read all I could find of Rushdie except Grimus, and my expectations simply weren’t realistic anymore, loving his books that much
Yeah. Fury is not very good. It has only fleeting glimmers of things I love about Rushdie's writing. If I had to pick a favorite from his later work, I'd say The Enchantress of Florence is probably his best. I have yet to read The Golden House and Shalimar the Clown.
I’ll check out the Enchantress of Florence, thank you for the tip � I read quite mixed reactions on ‘The Golden House�, I am still on a fence about it�
I enjoyed Joseph Anton because I'm interested in the 'Rushdie Affair' for historical and cultural reasons that remain ever-relevant. Plus, who doesn't love drama in general? And I'm interested in Rushdie as a writer and thinker. If you're not interested in these things then I wouldn't recommend it. The most interesting part of the book was his artistic/historical explanation behind his inspiration for The Satanic Verses.
I guess it would be useful to first re-read Satanic Verses in that case as after more than 20 years it is too vague in my memory � the title of Joseph Anton has been tickling me some time for the simple reason the writer chosen by Rushdie as part of his pseudonym also inspired the choice of my son’s name and I smile imagining the look on his face when he sees that title ;)
His two children's books are a delight too.
I loved ‘Haroun and the sea of stories�. Did you read his essays in Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981-1991?
Simply put, Rushdie is a treasure.
The more I think about how enjoyed his books in my younger days, the more I feel having wrongly abandoned him later! Thank you very much for this substantial reflection and sharing your profound appreciation of Rushdie’s work here, George!

Thank you very much for stopping by and reading despite not liking Rushdie's work, Marita! The good thing is he won't enlarge your reading pile then, at times it is a relief knowing we can skip some books too, I find :-).

Thank you so much, as ever, dear JV! Love your emoji's, you always know how to cheer me up :-) �!


I hadn't heard from her before this novel, Mekhala, so I am very grateful Rushdie's book pointed me to her work! What I could find on the web of her work looks truly variegated in style, but I thought it ever powerful. I wasn't aware either she is compared to Frida Kahlo, also because of that tragic life. I hope you'll find the novel rewarding if you would get to read it :-)

When reading Turgenev, I was pondering on who I would categorise as my 'best-loved' authors at the moment, Dolors, and so I realised that twenty years ago Salman Rushdie would have been among them - such made me translate the few sentences in Dutch I wrote long ago to praise this novel. From the response on this here I am aware I'd better reconsider reading him...there are just so many other books and authors I hope to read :-). Coming from you who invariably finds the most precise words to render your reading experience, I take what you write as a big compliment my friend, thank you very much, as ever :-). The spice trade and Cochin peppered this novel with a particular nice flavour ( the setting of Cochin also meaning a wonderful trip down memory lane for me :-).

Thank you very much, Czarny, this is a very kind thing to say. I am trying to teach myself to open my eyes more and less depend on words alone, and I enjoy that journey a lot.


Thank you very much, Violet. I seriously wonder if my response to his writing would still be the same as when I was reading him half a life time ago- he used to be one of my favourite authors but I haven’t read him since reading ‘Fury�, because it was such a disappointment.

Shalimar the Clown and The Enchantress of Florence are novels worth reading. I would very much like to know your opinion about them.

Thank you very much, Bill, so kind of you to say so! I am truly glad you enjoyed this and that you recognized Rushdie's peculiar dynamic (or dynamite? :)) voice in it - you capture that particular fire in him very well! At the time I was reading him, I mostly read realistic Dutch contemporary novels which made Rushdie's imaginative storytelling even more exciting as a contrast :).

Shalimar the Clown and The Enchantress of Florence are novels worth reading. I would..."
So kind of you to say so, Atri, thank you very much - I am we had a similar experience of being enraptured reading this novel :). It seems ages ago I have been reading a novel which was equally exuberant, so I will keep your tips in mind, thank you!

Thank you very much, Dmitri! I hope you'll enjoy the novel when you would pick it up. I am also eager to get back to Rushdie's fiction, I really enjoyed reading a collection of his essays last year.

Thank you very much, Linda, I am truly happy the paintings spoke to you as well! Sadly our library doesn't have any books on her but a graphic novel about women artists in which she features.


Thank you very much, P! I’d love to hear your thoughts on Rushdie, his imagination is pretty matchless if you ask me ;)

This quote you pulled is also fascinating I tried to see lovelessness as arrogance, for who but the loveless could believe themselves complete, all-seeing, all-wise? . Imagine getting a dozen people with opinions in a room to discuss that one??
I feel so privileged to have finally met him - I'd better get a rattle on at my age, I need to read more :))

Mark, thank you so much for your lovely comment! I am so glad that you met Rushdie and thatyour recent reading experience of 'The Golden House' was so enjoyable. It's wonderful to hear that Rushdie apparently is still amusing himself and his readers with his countless and delightful digressions :). He used to be one of my favourite authors, but I stopped reading him after 'Fury' because I thought it bland and disappointing, thinking I had read too much of him to be able to continue to appreciate him like I used to. Sometimes too much of what one likes is just too much and what he offers isn't exactly nouvelle cuisine size :). Good question on how he is when chatting - I imagine him a waterfall, sprawling one eloquent witz after another :).
The quote that you commented on made me wonder why nobody ever suggested reading Rushdie in my IRL reading club - maybe dropping that quote in the next meeting might tempt them :)?
On reading more: in my experience, the more I read, the more I want to read, and that yearningonly gets worse over the years :D! So much fascinating stuff, so much fun and information - one life is simply not enough for a reader :).