Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Stuart's Reviews > Nova

Nova by Samuel R. Delany
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
9456990
's review

liked it
bookshelves: galaxy-spanning, new-wave-sf

Nova: A New-Wave Grail Quest space opera from the 1960s
Originally posted at
Nova is Samuel "Chip" Delany's 1968 space opera with mythic/Grail Quest overtones. It is packed with different themes, subtexts, allegorical and cultural references, and literary experiments, and the young author (just 25 years old) is clearly a very talented, intelligent, and passionate writer.

But I didn't enjoy it, sadly. While I thought Babel-17 was a very fast-paced, vivid and engaging space opera that centered on language and identity, this book felt very turgid and forced. Why, you ask? Well, the author was determined to mold the story along the lines of a Grail Quest, Moby Dick, and Jason and the Argonauts, with the goal being a race to retrieve the super material Illyrion from the heart of a recently-exploded nova, in order to swing the balance of power in the universe between feuding aristocratic families. So events in the story have to conform to this format, and none of the actions of the characters rang true to me.

Obsession, greed, revenge, vying for supremacy - I can understand those emotions. But the actions of the characters, both the principals and supporting cast, don't seem to make much sense. If this rag-tag group of misfits was really determined to retrieve this material, why the heck did Delany structure the story the way he did? The first 10-15% of the book has Captain Lorq Von Ray gathering together his crew, and then for the next 50% of the book there is an overlong flashback of Lorq's childhood and encounters with the rival Red family and his nemesis Prince Red and his beautiful but submissive sister.

It's good to build the backstory for why the characters have such animosity for each other, but this section goes on far too long. There is also a detailed side-story about a young gypsy musician named Mouse, a windbag intellectual named Katin who wants to try the long-lost art of writing a novel, a drawn-out episode involving Tarot cards and how scientific they are, and a seemingly-aimless pit-stop on a planet that results in a major confrontation that ends inconclusively. By the time the mission to find the nova gets underway, we're already 70% through the book! Finally in the last 10% of the book the long-awaited encounter with the nova develops into a thoroughly unbelievable standoff between the main characters. This part made no sense to me whatsoever.

Though the writing quality and language are consistently strong like Babel-17, I feel like this was wasted since the story's pacing was so interminable and the mythic undertones just didn't resonate with me. I've always felt that realistic character motivations and world-building are far more appealing than stories that try hard to be symbolic and archetypal. Even within the book this dynamic is debated between the impulsive, emotional Mouse and the dry, intellectual Katin. Unfortunately, it seems that Katin has had a greater influence on the story than Mouse, and I never trust a book where a character is writing a novel that doesn't yet have a subject. You can see where that is headed a mile away.

There are certainly some fascinating cyborg aspects of the book that have clearly been influential on the Cyberpunk movement, since characters have implants (plugs) that allow them to directly interface with sockets and operate all types of machinery. Neuromancer, anyone? Even in Babel-17, I liked the fact that there was a huge databank of stored personalities that could be revived as discorporates.

But as should be clear now, though Delany can spin off lots of neat SF ideas, his real interests lie much more in the literary direction. Speaking of which, his 1968 Hugo Award winner The Einstein Intersection is probably the most overtly allegorical of all his books, but at least it is short, which cannot be said of his massive (and reportedly unreadable) magnum opus Dhalgren.
37 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Nova.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

January 14, 2015 – Shelved
January 14, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
January 14, 2015 – Shelved as: galaxy-spanning
January 14, 2015 – Shelved as: new-wave-sf
January 21, 2015 – Started Reading
January 25, 2015 –
page 35
15.63%
January 25, 2015 –
35.0%
January 25, 2015 –
35.0%
January 28, 2015 –
75.0%
January 30, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Justine (new)

Justine It can be really hard to review books like this. I think you have to decide whether you are placing them in context with other classic sci-fi of similar vintage or whether you are reading it to see if it can still stand up on its own today. It's funny that you mention Babel-17 as the Delaney book you enjoyed more because that just came up recently in a discussion about Jo Walton's book, What Makes This Book So Great, where she also says great things about Babel-17. Sorry I can't add links...I commenting on my phone instead of my ipad tonight!


message 2: by Apatt (new)

Apatt Always a pleasure to read your review Stewart. I'm not much tempted to read Dhalgren either, it doesn't look like something I will like.


Michael A wise and fair review. "Turgid" is a powerful word. The inadequate marriage of archetypal quest scenario with that of space opera action frame plus diversions that undermine momentum sounds right to my memory. At the time this felt fresh and deep and quirky hip. At the time, with the war and social upheavals, we were glad to get a tale with decent prose and dark poetical ambitions to balance out the escapism and morality tales of a lot of sci fi popular then. Dhalgren felt important for putting alienation on another plane, more interior than the more political and moralistic dystopian fiction that was just beginning to take off. I wouldn't argue with "unreadable" from the context of where my taste and options lie today.


Stuart Hi guys, thanks for your comments. It's true it's always a struggle on whether to approach a SF classic by imagining the context and times it was written in vs how it stands up today, and for me that perspective shifts as I read the book in question. In Delany's case, his writing is excellent but I think his literary ambitions can overwhelm the narrative structures he adopts. Full credit to him for trying to do so much innovation in the genre. I often wish I were a college student living in NYC in the late 1960s since it would have been such a turbulent and exciting time to be around.


message 5: by Elin (new)

Elin I liked Dhalgren a lot but I'm not sure I can imagine rereading it.


back to top