Bill Kerwin's Reviews > King Lear
King Lear
by
I've read Lear many times, and, although I didn't learn much about the play this reading, I did learn a little about myself. I have always loved the play, but in the past I found its injustice and evil nigh overpowering, its victims pathetically guiltless, its perspective verging on the nihilistic. Now, though, I see goodness and grace everywhere: in Cordelia's plain-spoken honesty and love for Lear, in Kent and Gloster's loyalty, in Edgar's bizarre attempt to heal his father's soul through stratagem, and--perhaps most important--in the way Lear himself grows in understanding and compassion even as he grows in grief and madness.
The bad guys have their moments too: the devotion of Oswald to Goneril, Edmund's tardy but apparently sincere attempt to save Cordelia and Lear's lives, and--my favorite--the heroic effort of Cornwall's servant to intervene in the blinding of Gloster by wounding the vicious master whom he has served loyally all his life.
Goodness seems to triumph here even in the midst of loss, and I no longer feel the evil to be overwhelming: I merely bow my head in thanksgiving for goodness and tremble in reverence before the mystery of life.
by

I've read Lear many times, and, although I didn't learn much about the play this reading, I did learn a little about myself. I have always loved the play, but in the past I found its injustice and evil nigh overpowering, its victims pathetically guiltless, its perspective verging on the nihilistic. Now, though, I see goodness and grace everywhere: in Cordelia's plain-spoken honesty and love for Lear, in Kent and Gloster's loyalty, in Edgar's bizarre attempt to heal his father's soul through stratagem, and--perhaps most important--in the way Lear himself grows in understanding and compassion even as he grows in grief and madness.
The bad guys have their moments too: the devotion of Oswald to Goneril, Edmund's tardy but apparently sincere attempt to save Cordelia and Lear's lives, and--my favorite--the heroic effort of Cornwall's servant to intervene in the blinding of Gloster by wounding the vicious master whom he has served loyally all his life.
Goodness seems to triumph here even in the midst of loss, and I no longer feel the evil to be overwhelming: I merely bow my head in thanksgiving for goodness and tremble in reverence before the mystery of life.
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
King Lear.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
May 12, 2007
– Shelved
August 26, 2011
–
Started Reading
August 26, 2011
– Shelved as:
16th-17th-c-brit
August 29, 2011
–
Finished Reading
August 20, 2012
– Shelved as:
stuart-drama
Comments Showing 1-43 of 43 (43 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Allison
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 19, 2015 04:53AM

reply
|
flag


I'm writing a book right now, as a matter of fact--it is called Big Sleep City Blues and it is a detective story/ fantasy that takes place almost exclusively in the city of the dead (which looks a lot like Columbus, Ohio).








Google it. There are plenty of versions available on line.

Here's a pretty good version with click-on notes for difficult words and passages.

This is the second time I'm reading.
Many consider this to be Shakespeare's greatest work ever, even greater than Hamlet. Hamlet, which has now replaced Macbeth as my favorite play (though not taking away the deep love I have for that play), seems to have been favored as Shakespeare's greatest by many, and Lear by others.
Which do you prefer?

This is the second time I'm reading.
Many consider this to be Shakespeare's greatest work ever, even greater than Hamlet. Hamlet, which has now replaced Macbeth as m..."
I am really happy we have all three plays, and am glad we do not have to choose between them.
I like Macbeth for its dark colors and inexorable moral universe, operating within a small, constricting space.
I like Hamlet for its breadth and the fullness of its humanity, its great range and its sense of immense waste.
But I prefer Lear above all of them because it is man looking up at the stars and feeling his smallness and yet affirming that there is--among the evil and the even more terrifying indifference--goodness to be valued and wisdom to be gained.


You may remember that I listed "Antony and Cleopatra" as my favorite of all the tragedies. Its imperial magnificence, its breadth (even greater than Hamlet's) and the great character Cleopatra are probably the reasons for me choice.
Othello I like a lot too, but I find it more melodramatic: the bad guy is so bad, and the hero is so helpless and so thoroughly manipulated. The language is magnificent, and it is certainly a great play, but I think I like Julius Caesar more. (But perhaps that is more a history play than a tragedy. I could see it either way.)

Brilliant, wonderful, incredible, magical, weird! Hahahahah
Seriously, it was an extraordinary experience!
Thank you for the review!


Thanks for the kind words.

Nope. Should I?




