J.G. Keely's Reviews > The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide: Five Complete Novels and One Story
The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide: Five Complete Novels and One Story (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, #1-5)
by
by

J.G. Keely's review
bookshelves: science-fiction, humor, novel, reviewed, uk-and-ireland, space-opera
May 13, 2007
bookshelves: science-fiction, humor, novel, reviewed, uk-and-ireland, space-opera
The universe is a joke.
Even before I was shown the meaning of life in a dream at 17 (then promptly forgot it because I thought I smelled pancakes), I knew this to be true--and yet, I have always felt a need to search for the truth, that nebulous, ill-treated creature. Adams has always been, to me, to be a welcome companion in that journey.
Between the search for meaning and the recognition that it's all a joke in poor taste lies Douglas Adams, and, luckily for us, he doesn't seem to mind if you lie there with him. He's a tall guy, but he'll make room.
For all his crazed unpredictability, Adams is a powerful rationalist. His humor comes from his attempts to really think through all the things we take for granted. It turns out it takes little more than a moment's questioning to burst our preconceptions at the seams, yet rarely does this stop us from treating the most ludicrous things as if they were perfectly reasonable.
It is no surprise that famed atheist Richard Dawkins found a friend and ally in Adams. What is surprising is that people often fail to see the rather consistent and reasonable philosophy laid out by Adams' quips and absurdities. His approach is much more personable (and less embittered) than Dawkins', which is why I think of Adams as a better face for rational materialism (which is a polite was of saying 'atheism').
Reading his books, it's not hard to see that Dawkins is tired of arguing with uninformed idiots who can't even recognize when a point has actually been made. Adams' humanism, however, stretched much further than the contention between those who believe, and those who don't.
We see it from his protagonists, who are not elitist intellectuals--they're not even especially bright--but damn it, they're trying. By showing a universe that makes no sense and having his characters constantly question it, Adams is subtly hinting that this is the natural human state, and the fact that we laugh and sympathize shows that it must be true.
It's all a joke, it's all ridiculous. The absurdists might find this depressing, but they're just a bunch of narcissists, anyhow. Demnading the world make sense and give you purpose is rather self centered when it already contains toasted paninis, attractive people in bathing suits, and Euler's Identity. I say let's sit down at the bar with the rabbi, the priest, and the frog and try to get a song going. Or at least recognize that it's okay to laugh at ourselves now and again. It's not the end of the world.
It's just is a joke, but only some of us are in on it.
Even before I was shown the meaning of life in a dream at 17 (then promptly forgot it because I thought I smelled pancakes), I knew this to be true--and yet, I have always felt a need to search for the truth, that nebulous, ill-treated creature. Adams has always been, to me, to be a welcome companion in that journey.
Between the search for meaning and the recognition that it's all a joke in poor taste lies Douglas Adams, and, luckily for us, he doesn't seem to mind if you lie there with him. He's a tall guy, but he'll make room.
For all his crazed unpredictability, Adams is a powerful rationalist. His humor comes from his attempts to really think through all the things we take for granted. It turns out it takes little more than a moment's questioning to burst our preconceptions at the seams, yet rarely does this stop us from treating the most ludicrous things as if they were perfectly reasonable.
It is no surprise that famed atheist Richard Dawkins found a friend and ally in Adams. What is surprising is that people often fail to see the rather consistent and reasonable philosophy laid out by Adams' quips and absurdities. His approach is much more personable (and less embittered) than Dawkins', which is why I think of Adams as a better face for rational materialism (which is a polite was of saying 'atheism').
Reading his books, it's not hard to see that Dawkins is tired of arguing with uninformed idiots who can't even recognize when a point has actually been made. Adams' humanism, however, stretched much further than the contention between those who believe, and those who don't.
We see it from his protagonists, who are not elitist intellectuals--they're not even especially bright--but damn it, they're trying. By showing a universe that makes no sense and having his characters constantly question it, Adams is subtly hinting that this is the natural human state, and the fact that we laugh and sympathize shows that it must be true.
It's all a joke, it's all ridiculous. The absurdists might find this depressing, but they're just a bunch of narcissists, anyhow. Demnading the world make sense and give you purpose is rather self centered when it already contains toasted paninis, attractive people in bathing suits, and Euler's Identity. I say let's sit down at the bar with the rabbi, the priest, and the frog and try to get a song going. Or at least recognize that it's okay to laugh at ourselves now and again. It's not the end of the world.
It's just is a joke, but only some of us are in on it.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
February 1, 2002
–
Finished Reading
May 13, 2007
– Shelved
May 26, 2007
– Shelved as:
science-fiction
May 26, 2007
– Shelved as:
humor
January 29, 2008
– Shelved as:
novel
June 9, 2009
– Shelved as:
reviewed
September 4, 2010
– Shelved as:
uk-and-ireland
September 13, 2011
– Shelved as:
space-opera
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)
date
newest »


It surprised me a bit that I never thought of it that way, but I had a similar experience. By portraying all media as flawed and biased, and then admitting that it is a part of that flawed, biased system, you are left only with yourself. It's a bit scary to have to rely on your own brain, but it can be quite fulfilling, no?
There are similarities between Pratchett and Adams, I did notice that. Unfortunately, I kept hoping that Pratchett would reach the level of absurdism and insight Adams is capable of, but never saw it. Pratchett's jokes have always seemed more obvious and hackneyed.
I found myself laughing at every tenth joke, which were enjoyable, but I was driven off by the fact that the other nine made me roll my eyes. Then again, everyone's doing social satire these days, so perhaps Pratchett just couldn't stick out in the thronging crowd.
Adams is in more rarefied air in taking on the world, but I can't help but think that is only because his job is the harder one.





Adams is definitely a satirist making his points..."
Indeed - but he was also well-known for being an atheist.

So it is with some relief that I find we at least share admiration for Adams and his satirical work.
I think your review is spot-on in identifying what makes these novels so great. Not only is Douglas Adams a master of silly humour and, yes, slapstick, and wordplay, but he also uses these things to rather good-naturedly point out that the universe really is a rather strange place, and that we should allow ourselves to explore it and question it -- and be open-minded and rational about it.
I am aware that you have been less than impressed by Terry Pratchett, but I would argue that in this regard, he and Dougls Adams are soul-mates. They both make us take a new look at things by showing us the things we take for granted reflected in a funhouse mirror. There are differences between the two, of course. Pratchett never was all that good at slapstick silliness, and needed find his own voice. Also, Pratchett rarely really takes on the world as such, but concentrates on society and cultural phenomena.