Kalliope's Reviews > Oedipus Rex
Oedipus Rex (The Theban Plays, #1)
by

I have not read Sophocles� text recently, but listened to
exceptional audio edition. Powerfully acted out, with an eerie chorus and dramatic music, it has been a superb experience.
I have come back to this play now in a roundabout way. As part of a Seminar on Aesthetics, The Eye that Thinks, imparted in the Prado Museum, we were prompted by our Professor Félix de Azúa to read Oedipus in a Hegelian framework. We had been discussing the contributions of Hegel to Aesthetics, and he wanted us to visit the play and think of the role of Sphinx and the significance of Thebes.
In Hegel’s aesthetic system he identified Greek sculptures as the apex of what art could achieve in its quest of perfect and supreme beauty. Earlier architecture and art were still immature attempts. For example, the large Egyptian monuments were undertakings in which matter still prevailed over Geist. When Hegel saw some Kouroi in Munich (now in the Glyptotech), specimens of very early Greek art, he was struck by the significance of the step in this walking man.

In Egyptian representations of humans, legs are seen in profile. They depicted stability, while the Greek marble in Munich man was striding forward. The Kouros, although still using Egyptian conventions presented something very new. It embodied gesture. And Hegel thought that art should strive to represent movement.
The conceptual step of the Kouros, an awakening out of immobility, separated the worlds of the two Thebes: the one in Boetia in ancient Greece from the one up the Nile in ancient Egypt. In Greece Geist was finally on the move.

If Hegel favoured Greek sculpture, he found that Greek drama could offer an additional dimension to sculpted beauty as the unfolding of time could be represented as well. For him Greek tragedy had invoked the greatest aesthetic power.

Hegel had also understood the Egyptian Sphinx as the first instance of the representation of human emerging out, liberating himself, from his animal nature. In this reading of Oedipus Rex as I have tried to keep on some sort of Hegelian glasses (and forget about the pervasive Freudian interpretation), I have seen the solution of Oedipus to the riddle of the Sphinx, and the consequent dissolution of the curse on Thebes and the destruction of the monster, as the emergence of humanity over its previous servitudes and imprisonment.
And yet, this conquered freedom also brought the possibility of unwilled intention or of the unintended will and the impossibility of unlearning what one already knows.
Trapped in this situation Oedipus attempt to escape his knowledge by doing away with his eyes, could only bring death.
As the chorus chants: it is the only liberation.

---
by


THE EYE THAT DIES
I have not read Sophocles� text recently, but listened to
exceptional audio edition. Powerfully acted out, with an eerie chorus and dramatic music, it has been a superb experience.
I have come back to this play now in a roundabout way. As part of a Seminar on Aesthetics, The Eye that Thinks, imparted in the Prado Museum, we were prompted by our Professor Félix de Azúa to read Oedipus in a Hegelian framework. We had been discussing the contributions of Hegel to Aesthetics, and he wanted us to visit the play and think of the role of Sphinx and the significance of Thebes.
In Hegel’s aesthetic system he identified Greek sculptures as the apex of what art could achieve in its quest of perfect and supreme beauty. Earlier architecture and art were still immature attempts. For example, the large Egyptian monuments were undertakings in which matter still prevailed over Geist. When Hegel saw some Kouroi in Munich (now in the Glyptotech), specimens of very early Greek art, he was struck by the significance of the step in this walking man.

In Egyptian representations of humans, legs are seen in profile. They depicted stability, while the Greek marble in Munich man was striding forward. The Kouros, although still using Egyptian conventions presented something very new. It embodied gesture. And Hegel thought that art should strive to represent movement.
The conceptual step of the Kouros, an awakening out of immobility, separated the worlds of the two Thebes: the one in Boetia in ancient Greece from the one up the Nile in ancient Egypt. In Greece Geist was finally on the move.

If Hegel favoured Greek sculpture, he found that Greek drama could offer an additional dimension to sculpted beauty as the unfolding of time could be represented as well. For him Greek tragedy had invoked the greatest aesthetic power.

Hegel had also understood the Egyptian Sphinx as the first instance of the representation of human emerging out, liberating himself, from his animal nature. In this reading of Oedipus Rex as I have tried to keep on some sort of Hegelian glasses (and forget about the pervasive Freudian interpretation), I have seen the solution of Oedipus to the riddle of the Sphinx, and the consequent dissolution of the curse on Thebes and the destruction of the monster, as the emergence of humanity over its previous servitudes and imprisonment.
And yet, this conquered freedom also brought the possibility of unwilled intention or of the unintended will and the impossibility of unlearning what one already knows.
Trapped in this situation Oedipus attempt to escape his knowledge by doing away with his eyes, could only bring death.
As the chorus chants: it is the only liberation.

---
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Oedipus Rex.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jasmine
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 04, 2015 10:53PM

reply
|
flag

Thank you... Actually, this one here is not the edition I am going to use... I have a wonderful boxed set of the three Greek dramaturges translated by Lattimore. I used the latter's version of Homer's texts.. and they were wonderful.
I reread Antigone a few years ago and I read these in school.. but now I have to read it again for a Seminar on Aesthetics I am taking in the Prado museum.

Seminar on Aesthetics at the Prado Museum? Wow - sounds wonderful! I wish I could join you... Enjoy!


Thank you... yes, I can access it... Certainly to listen to....
I am actually listening to Oedipus Rex and may read it later, once I finish the Audio.. my two versions follow different translations.


Yes, I am using English translations.. Have the Greene on paper for Oedipus Rex, but I am listening to this, which is fabulous...
Also, I saw years ago Pasolini's
which I am thinking of ordering.
Read Antigone a few years ago.., in this edition.

I love some of the Naxos Audiobooks of Shakespeare's plays. They also have good recitations of a selection of Keats' and Yeats' poetry. I think Michael Sheen is one of the performers for the Naxos Romeo and Juliet and recites some of the Keats poetry they have done - I like his work. I'll add Oedipus the King to my wishlist. Thanks.

P.S. That first link in your review doesn't work for me.

P.S. That first link in your review doesn't work for me."
Thank you Teresa (double thank you). I was glad to listen to this again because the elements that drew my attention now were not the ones I remembered from my first read....
Solved the link..
Have you seen Pasolini's film with Silvana Mangano?

Thank you, Jan-Maat. Very pleasing feedback, especially coming from you.

I haven't. It does look good. I don't believe I've seen any version of it, except the one performed by my fellow high school classmates (all-girls school). ;)

I love the tracing of the evolution between the two dimensional Egyptian figuration and the Greek Kouros striding out though. Even in sculpture, the Egyptians didn't separate the legs from the mass of a statue, did they? Or they showed them in a sitting position.
Then there's the 'unlearning' message. Powerful.
And superb illustrations as usual. The last one!

I haven't. It does look good. I don't believe I've seen any version of it, except the one performed by my fellow high school c..."
I will probably order it in DVD.. I saw years ago this Pasolini film and it had a great impact.. I still remember scenes...
By chance as I was writing this review, I received a notification from a theatre in Madrid which I like and they are putting on, soon, Oedipus, Medea and Antigone.
What a chance!!

No, I have not listened to this Stravinsky and will surely look for it.. I was a great fan of Theodorakis some years ago.. will try to listen to these pieces to see if I still like his music.


Thank you for reading and commenting, PGR.
I had read this play a few years ago, and plan to reread it again soon.
But in defence of the audio versions of plays, remember that they were written to be performed, not read... Some later exceptions are plays such as Lorenzaccio, since it would last over 6 hours..!!!
I am becoming a fan of reading and listening at the same time, but with this play the editions I have are by different translators.
I have two in text form, one by David Grene and one by Watling.. Do you have a favourite one?
I want to reread it nonetheless because I will also be attending a performance in a couple of months.. I just got the tickets.

Thank you, PGR....

I love the tracing of the evolution between the two dimensional Egyptian figuration and the Greek Kouros s..."
Fionnuala, I am sorry my review has turned into another riddle by the Sphynx. Since I prefer not to jump into the precipice, I have fleshed out a bit more the reasoning... I was perhaps too excited when I left the Seminar... and my thoughts jumped around too much...
Thank you for your patience...!!!!....

Between the riddle of the Sphinx and the riddle of Hegel, I was a bit lost! - I probably need a seminar on Aesthetics but in the meantime, I'll just have a seminar from Kalliope instead!
Thanks again for such a stimulating review.

Betwee..."
:)
I am beginning to think whether it would not be safer to not try to learn more about Aesthetics... Learning that knowledge can be dangerous and that there is no way back... may be I should stay put...


Thank you, Laura....Yes... this is an extraordinary tragedy.