Kai Spellmeier's Reviews > Peter Pan
Peter Pan
by
by

“To die will be an awfully big adventure.�
I didn't love this book as much as I wanted to. Peter Pan's world is this magical, wonderful, dangerous place full of adventures. One of those places every child wants to visit, exactly like Wendy and her brothers. Just open a window and fly away.
I read this book because 1. it's a classic and 2. because it's my friend's favourite book of all times. It was my duty to pick this up. But it wasn't completely what I imagined. The book wasn't as exciting, the characters not as likeable as I thought. It was not exactly the kind of fairytale I had in mind.
Still, it's a classic, and a beautiful one, too.
I didn't love this book as much as I wanted to. Peter Pan's world is this magical, wonderful, dangerous place full of adventures. One of those places every child wants to visit, exactly like Wendy and her brothers. Just open a window and fly away.
I read this book because 1. it's a classic and 2. because it's my friend's favourite book of all times. It was my duty to pick this up. But it wasn't completely what I imagined. The book wasn't as exciting, the characters not as likeable as I thought. It was not exactly the kind of fairytale I had in mind.
Still, it's a classic, and a beautiful one, too.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Peter Pan.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
April 2, 2015
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ilona
(new)
-
added it
May 07, 2017 07:53AM

reply
|
flag

Yeah I know that feeling


I think the French do a better job of capturing character in their classics-- at least, I recall Stendhal doing a marvelous job of it in 'The Red and The Black' (that book is pretty much all passion-- trust the French!)

Yes I agree, most (British) classics I've read have that detached feelingto it. That's why so many struggle to finish them.
Never even heard of it but thanks for the recommendation. I'll check it out :)

What can I say, it's in our blood to be ever so slightly detached. Rather funny, really, since we can be ridiculously passionate on points of honour, but ah well. That's national character for you.
(Then again, a lot of the Russian classics I have read-- such as Tolstoy and Turgenev-- have that same sense of decidedly English detachment wrapped in a generally pastoral setting-- which I find funny seeing as the impression I get from those novels is that Russians at that time emulated the French more than anybody).
From general consensus everyone says nice things about Stendhal, but I still consider that book to be the foremost of his work and a much-underrated classic. I really enjoyed it when I read it, and I've been thinking of doing a reread. Certainly worth reading once though, in my opinion (and if not, there are plenty of film versions floating around).
And of course Alexandre Dumas (in my humble opinion) also does a good job of making his books with exciting-sounding plots actually exciting. Jules Verne, however, leaves something to be desired (in my experience, anyway).