ŷ

Gretel's Reviews > The Ring

The Ring by Kōji Suzuki
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
42618597
's review

it was ok

First off, I want to say that English is not my mother-tongue. I try my best to avoid mistakes, but I’m sure the text contains errors.

Trigger warning: Rape.

REVIEW CONTINUES IN COMMENT SECTION


Now to the review.
I’ve read The Ring for a Seminar on Japanese contemporary literature and literary discourse. I read parts of the original Japanese novel and the German translation, which is a translation from the English translation� Yes, this happens more often than we academics wished for. Translations are already tricky, but to be so lazy as to translate a translation? I have no words for this incredibly stupid practice of German publishing companies. They did this with Mishima Yukio’s Confessions of a Mask, also translated from English to German. No, they did not bother to make a new translation from Japanese, yet. We only have the translation from 1964. Good job, publishers!

Back to the topic.
Like many others I have seen the movies: the whole Japanese Ringu series, and the American version The Ring. I was excited to read the novel, since I expected something intriguing, uncanny, a well-developed plot, and a deeper insight into the characters. Unfortunately, I am rather disappointed.
It’s not a terrible book, but while reading it I had the feeling I was holding the first draft instead of a published novel. There are several points I want to mention to illustrate what exactly irked me.

1. The writing style
I have read worse, but I have read better. Suzuki writes very simplistic, and while I think that a simple writing style per se is not bad, it seemed that he just couldn’t write better. In many instances he focuses on the wrong details. For example, the first chapter is a very long, very boring description of building, neighborhood, and so forth, that do not add to the setting. It is a dull description with no connection or payoff with the mystery that is going on inside the house. I didn’t matter how the neighborhood looked like at all, since the main part of the story was inside the character: her thoughts, fears, anxiety, etc., and the horror that took her life.
Another problem was the lack of sensory descriptions. It was a lot of telling, and almost no showing. If Suzuki described something it was almost entirely visual, and in second place what the character felt like. No smell, no taste, no touch, no audio. This makes it very difficult to fully emerge into the story. It’s even worse, because the plot doesn’t really affect the characters. Asakawa is understandably disturbed and concerned, but he’s such a whiny, arrogant prick that I don’t care what happens to him. And when he says “This here is very disturbing to me!� I, as a reader, don’t care, because it’s not only too much telling (instead of showing), there is seldom any real consequence from what is happening. Sure, more whiny panicking, but does Asakawa actually DO more than that? Nope. He prefers to angst about his misunderstood intellect, that poor righteous soul.

Also, the plotting doesn’t always work.
Asakawa decides to take a taxi. The driver reports from a mysterious sudden death of a young man on his motor bike. The young man falls to the ground, while clutching his throat, and then he dies. Just like that. Asakawa is immediately intrigued although he shouldn’t. In reality, it’s just a random death and as a journalist Asakawa has surely heard hundreds and thousands of stories about people dying. But no, because the author knows the story is relevant, Asakawa “feels� it’s relevant. Instincts, he calls it. I call it bullshit.
The driver then says, after Asakawa asks, that the young man died from a heart attack on day XY. HERE is when Asakawa should have been interested, because the boy died the same day, same hour, and because of the same reason as his niece died. THIS should have caught his attention. Not some random dude dying.
Suzuki, this is not how it works.
This “instinct� or deus ex machine plot driving machine happens quite often.

2. Plotholes
There are minor and bigger plotholes.
Some of the smaller ones are inconsistencies from one page to the other. The first chapter the girls describes how a moth flies through a window into her room, flutters a little bit around, and out it goes again. Just two or three pages later she sees a fly and wonders how it got into the room, since everything was closed. What? She JUST described how a moth flew in and out of her open window but the fly is oh so mysterious?
Another scene: Asakawa drives during the night to the holiday park inn. It’s heavily raining. He clearly says that he stops the windshield wipers when the rain stops. Just a few pages later he says that he hadn’t noticed how the rain had stopped. What again?
I can get that he was so caught up in thoughts and fear/anticipation he might have not noticed the rain stop, but AFTER he consciously stopped the wipers, clearly thinking “Oh, it’s not raining anymore, better stop using these!� and then he forgets? How is that possible?
These mistakes are small but show how much care was put into writing the story. And I haven’t even started with the bigger plotholes, yet.

3. Media and science is bad, y’all!
I love good stories and non-fiction books/discussion/whatever about the “good and bad� of media and science. Both things are incredibly important for our society. They are great tools for information, advancement, and education which, in a ‘perfect� world, would lead to progress.
Of course there are the darker sides. Just off the top of my head: propaganda, misinformation, falsification of data, instrumentalization for war machinery, the question of whether we should make experiment A or B and the moral stands, the dangers of ‘robotizing� society, and much more. As with many things in life, it depends on how you use it and what for.

Suzuki on the other hand knows better. He has found the hidden and ugly face of media and science: THEY ARE EVIL!
If I had known that it was this simple�
Asakawa is a journalist himself and while Suzuki shoves in some “media is not all bad!� and “well, science and technology are useful!�, he always follows it with his big, glaring, billboard sized “BUT!�. What follows is the same one-sided BS you hear when someone starts with “I’m not a racist, but�!�.

The book is set in 1991 (if I’m not mistaken…maybe 1989?). Asawaka and his boss think of his catastrophic failure from two years ago where he wrote an article with occultist elements. Apparently two years before the story about Asakawa and Sadako happened, Japan had a huge wave of occultist hysteria with “commoners� sending stories to newspaper publishers. First, they make fun of the stupid Japanese, non-journalistic population, because Haha, look at those idiots! All of Japan’s media ignored the happening, destroyed the texts, and congratulated themselves for their elitist club. Then, when it is clear that spooky shit is happening, Asakawa goes full idiot mode: “Media didn’t believe them, but supernatural things are real! They do happen! Those ignorant journalists and scientists!�
Excuse me, but what exactly are you getting all worked up for?
If there is something supernatural going on, prove it. Show it to scientists and then see what happens. Don’t blame media for being skeptical if they don’t believe in the boogeyman although there never was any proof for his existence.

It gets worse. Warning, this part contains spoilers on Sadako’s backstory!

Shizuko, Sadako’s mother, had supernatural powers, commonly called as ESP. She could see into the future, read minds, and other stuff. Her husband, a doctor, wanted to proof that she had those powers. In the beginning the media was all excited, but soon skepticism grew, since there were only written texts and no tangible proofs of her abilities. Society and media scrutinized them. That of course is awful, but at the same time understandable. Would you believe anyone on the internet who says “Hey, I can totally read people’s minds! Make a video and proof it? Call scientists? Nah, just believe me, it’s real!�?
Didn’t think so.
Shizuka’s husband then wants to proof her abilities in front of media and calls for a press conference. All is ready, cameras rolling, people waiting, but Shizuko fails � the pressure and stress, as well as the peoples thoughts (they don’t believe her and she hears that), as well as the fact that she didn’t want to do the test but her husband forced her too (oh, the sexism is another topic�) � and all media attacks them. Of course they think it’s a sham.
While I do think that media can go too far when antagonizing certain people, we shouldn’t forget the fact that they were rightfully criticizing them, since there was NO proof for Shizuko’s ability. WE as the reader know about her powers but why should the rest of the world just believe her?
Exactly, there is no reason to.

Shizuko’s later throws herself into a volcano. Her husband gets very sick and dies also. Sadako is an orphan.
What do Asakawa and Ryuji (his “BFF�) think?
Well, of course Sadako is angry with the press and the WHOLE Japanese society! The dared criticize them for “magic abilities� they couldn’t prove! Those evil bastards! Yes, the WHOLE Japanese society is responsible for Shizuko’s death.
How about this: Sadako’s father is responsible.
Boom, mind blown!
He forced her to prove her powers and Shizuko failed because of the pressure and antagonizing energy towards her. Instead of blaming the person responsible for her failure � her husband � Suzuki blames the press, because how fucking dare they not believe in something clearly never witnessed before! I mean they are after all being hunted by a magical killing video tape energy virus!
As I said, media might have gone overboard, but come the fuck on.

It’s even worse, because Suzuki says through Asawaka and Ryuji: Yeah, science/technology is neat and all, but scientists can’t explain EVERYTHING, therefore they are useless! Lying, fascistic pigs with no moral fiber!
Science is not here to dismiss magic and sit on a horse, mightily judging the plebs. If there is “magic� (or EPS or whatever), science will take a look at it and try to find out WHAT it is and HOW it works!
If someone can read minds and you have proof (videos and lots of tests, etc.), scientists will do everything to find out how it works because science is all about understanding what is there by proving and disproving.
Can you imagine how it would change the world if there was a huge, quantifiable source of ESP activity?
Well, it would not only change the world as we know it, it would become “science�, since the difference between “magic� and “science� is: I can quantify it and prove its existence, now I have to understand how it works.
Suzuki mentions several times how arrogant scientists are since they can’t understand everything and they would discard prove of the supernatural, because scientists are just arrogant, elitist assholes and of course you should believe in magically killing video tapes, y’all! I SAW it!
Since Suzuki has exactly two people talking about science and both are self-congratulatory assholes about their incredibly “philosophical� dispute and just say: “Yep, science is stupid, because they don’t believe�, the discourse ends with that ignorant statement and a glaring warning sign of Suzuki’s inability to understand what the fuck science is all about.

4. Sexism and rape
Before I start, let me first say that I do not condemn the topic of rape or sexism in literature. Both things are prevalent in our society and should have their space in literature as well. Disgusting figures in literature have their right to exist, because there are disgusting people in reality. A book is not bad because rape or sexism happen, it is bad when it uses rape for shock value (with a side-dish of apologist discourse) and blatant, internalized, and never questioned sexism (by no one).

Let’s begin with something light.
Every time a woman talks or is about to talk, Asakawa gets pissed as hell.
His wife is concerned about his weird behavior?
“OMG, shut up! I’m busy investigating, woman, don’t you see?!� that’s what the thinks. Internally nagging about his wife Shizuko (similar name to Sadako’s mother, yes, but different kanji). He even says that shizu comes from quiet, so she should follow her name and shut the fuck up.
How about you tell your wife something important is bugging you, but you can’t tell her right now, but you will, as soon as you are ready? Talk to her like a fucking adult instead of dismissing her as the typical “talkative� wife, which she clearly isn’t? You patronizing prick.

When Asakawa calls his in laws he is happy when Shizuko’s father picks up, because the mother-in-law would “talk too much, omg so annoying!!! Geez, women! Ugh!�. In a short scene on the video (not part of Sadako’s nightmare ride) you see a program on literature, with the male host, male poet, and the pretty looking bimbo girl. This is how the book describes it, I shit you not.
“Look at that useless, pretty girl!� Choke on that, girls.
The receptionist working for Nagao (appears below)? Stupid, talkative bitch!
The maybe-gf of Ryuji? Well, she is pure and okay, but mainly because she is oh so fucking pretty and skinny! OMG soooo pretty! Look at how pretty she is! She is smart? Who the fuck cares, pretty! Breasts! Legs! Innocence! Skinny!
Sadako? OMG SOOOO PRETTY! LIKE EVEN PRETTIER THAN RYUJI’S GF! OMG INSTABONER!

Women: talkative, nagging, ugly bitches or decorative elements for male sexual satisfaction.
This is sexist, for both men and women.
And this shit is completely normal in the book. Nobody thinks twice. Of course women talk too much and annoy the poor hero! Of course pretty women need to be fucked and/or raped! Of course women don’t have any important position ever! There are only there to look pretty!

One girl in the course was all like “Well, what did you expect, it was THOSE times, and it’s Japan�. Thank you, I know Japan has major issues with sexism. This does not mean that I should accept it without any criticism and join the club. Just no.
Yes, there are very talkative women and women who use their looks, but a) none of these two things are represented in the books, it’s all male gaze and stereotyping things who aren’t like that, b) all the women in the novel is just too fucking much, c) it’s not an inherently female trait, despite what patriarchy claims, and d) there's nothing inherently wrong in being pretty or using your looks as a career (as long as you're not abusive).


This part will contain major spoilers and a HUGE plot twist.
Reader’s discretion advised!


Asakawa is a journalist, and since Suzuki is clearly a better writer than I am, Asakawa is almost completely unable to think logically, find and understand clues, and interpret obvious messages. That is why he needs help from his “BFF� Ryuji, a professor of philosophy and rapist.
Asakawa loves to say how much he despises Ryuji and describes him as disgusting, weird, and unpleasant. Why is he friends with him? Because the plot says so. There is no other fucking reason.
While they talk about the dead kids and the tape Ryuji mentions that he “did it again�. Asakawa explains how as a teenager he “befriended� Ryuji, or rather Ryuji him. Asakawa was 16/17 waiting in class, reading, before school started, when a still drunk Ryuji appears. He then tells him how he got drunk, took a stroll in the middle of the night, and got a “feeling� of raping a woman he had seen. So he goes to her apartment, and wonder of wonders, the door is magically open. He gets in and rapes her.
Asakawa is disgusted and does absolutely nothing. He doesn’t tell anybody, nor does he call the police. I would have accepted it, since he was still a teenager and probably scared himself. But Ryuji later on continued raping, Asakawa knew that, and did jackshit to stop him. Asakawa is around 33 to 35 years old, is married and has an 18-months-old daughter. One could think that an adult, a journalist, a man with wife and daughter would somehow CARE for something like rape. Nope. Not him.
He doesn’t call the police. Ever. He doesn’t even think he could or should. But he is oh so utterly disgusted by Ryuji, guys!
Now some who read the novel might say: “But it’s not clear IF Ryuji really raped those women!�
Well, not only is the doubt of those rapes rather weak, Asakawa STILL should have called the police numerous times! He has a man confessing his crimes in detail! His fucking job as a human being is to call the police, tell them everything he knows and that’s it. It’s then the police’s job to see what happened and prove Ryuji’s guilt.
There is literally no reason at all for Asakawa to shut his trap other than he is too fucking stupid to solve the mystery himself so he befriends a rapist for over 15 years so one day that “friend� can save his stupid ass from a killer video tape virus.

But this isn’t enough. Oh, no!
Now we get to the grrrrreat bits with Sadako!
Here I warn again of major spoilers and plot twists.


Sadako goes to Tokyo when she’s 18/19 and joins a theater group. We find out that one of the group’s founder has the hots for her so of course he gets drunk and “visits� her in the middle of the night in her apartment. The guy telling the story makes it clear that the dude wanted to rape her. Everybody knew it, no one cared. Shit happens, I guess, eh, ladies?
The next day he comes to practice, but he’s all pale and suddenly he dies. It’s clear that his rape attempt failed and later on we find out that Sadako, who didn’t go to rehearsal that day, had killed him telepathically.
Congratulations, Sadako, you didn’t get raped thanks to your excellent ESP skills!
Women, now we know how to protect us!
This is also a good tip for men.
So to everyone reading this: Remember, if you don’t want to get raped, close your doors and get your supernatural skills growing.

Is this the end?
Of course not!
Sadako visits her sick father in a sanatorium for people suffering from tuberculosis. There works a young doctor who contracted smallpox, called Nagao. He sees Sadako, talks to her and gets suddenly a “dark urge�, a “voice� telling him to do things, and all that crap also Ryuji used to excuse his rapes.
Nagao lures her away and rapes her, taking her virginity. Sadako fights and bites a huge chunk of flesh out of his shoulder so that the bone is visible. After the rape Nagao marvels at her breasts and the sunrays touching her glistening pubic hairs (just…don’t ask me…seriously), and then he looks again at her vagina and sees two fully grown testicles.
Yes, Sadako is intersex.
Here comes the voice again, telling him to do dark things, so he throws her into the well, throws down some rocks and kills her that way.

Now, the rape part is horrible, but I could have “lived� with it, if not for what happened right after Asakawa and Ryuji knew the truth. Since Sadako has immense powers, more than her mother, they conclude that she should have fought harder � she already killed one dude, so why not kill Nagao? � and that she must have known she was going to get raped.
Even better, she FORCED Nagao to rape and kill her, which in their opinion is the “dark voice� in Nagao’s head telling him to do so. Nagao is basically Sadako’s victim. She forced him to rape her because she wanted revenge.
How and why?

Well, Japanese society and media had killed her mother and since everyone is evil she wanted to take revenge. Now, Sadako is intersex, a fact that has been hinted twice. Once where a friend of Asakawa describes her (he looks at a photo from her time during the theatre group) as unbelievably beautiful (like every other guy in the story) in a very exaggerated creepy way, but she lacks “motherly qualities�. What the hell does that mean, you ask?

-> SEE COMMENT SECTION
55 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Ring.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 29, 2015 – Started Reading
April 29, 2015 – Shelved
May 1, 2015 –
page 25
8.31% "1. Why does the journalist memorize the driver's name instinctively rather than, I don't know, deliberately?
2. Why does the story interest him so soon? A guy fell over and died, so what? Only the surprised face and date of death should spark his interest, not the random, non-informative description of some dude's death by the driver. This could have been handeled way more elegant."
May 2, 2015 –
page 41
13.62% "Well, so far it's quite okay. I like the subtle comments/metaphors for Japanese contemporary society and literary discourse.
The plot itself is intruiging but not scary.
I find it interesting how "Japanese" the writing style is even though it's a translation from a translation...will have to read the original text soon, anyway. XD"
May 2, 2015 –
page 64
21.26% "Oh, so this is how it's going to be: people "believing" in proof & sience are just silly, unrooted from their primordial fear of nature & demons. The "spiritual" people are smart, cause they know to fear the boogeyman.
I wouldn't mind a deep discussion about science and human's fear of the uncanny, but the author isn't good enough. He sloppily scratches the surface & leaves a shallow taste of self-entitlement."
May 3, 2015 –
page 82
27.24% "Apart from new irritatingly stupid sentences, the suspense is slowly kicking in. Asakawa (MC) has the video, yay!"
May 3, 2015 –
page 96
31.89% "The description of the video was okay, but the ending really got me. I don't wanna spoil it, but it was creepy. Not because of ghosts, insects, spooks, or anything like that, but because it's a real every-day life horror."
May 3, 2015 –
page 109
36.21% "I just...can't. I didn't particularly like the MC from start on, but now...
Okay, spoiler art:

He is friends with a rapist. He doesn't like the guy that much (actually at all), but clearly there is "no other way than being friends with him". Because reasons. Not the MC or the author are bothered to explain to me why he befriends a man who rapes women and never ever calls the police."
May 3, 2015 –
page 130
43.19%
May 3, 2015 –
page 179
59.47%
May 3, 2015 –
page 220
73.09%
May 3, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Annamaria I haven't written a review for this book because I'm not good at those but... Here it is! Everything that I've ever thought about this book summarized in your review! Thank you!


Gretel Annamaria wrote: "I haven't written a review for this book because I'm not good at those but... Here it is! Everything that I've ever thought about this book summarized in your review! Thank you!"

I'm sorry for my late answer!
I don't know why but I never got any notification or I just oversaw it!
But thank you so much for your feedback! I'm glad you reckognize your opinion here. :)
It took me a lot of time to write this review and I still feel I've missed so many points.


Asghar Abbas What an excellent, excellent review! Really insightful and just amazing. As I read this I quickly forgot that English isn't your first language. I love German people, very decent folks. And yeah, the sexism in this horror book was horrible and very disgusting. It only propounded the repressed male stereotype. Anyway, good job on your very sharply observed points.


message 4: by Sol (new)

Sol Sol Solcito Sadako forced him because she wanted to be a mother, if I'm not mistaken. -not that it makes things any better-. Also I might be wrong, but the first dude from the theatre group did rape her :-/... That is how she realized she couldn't be a mother


Gretel Asghar wrote: "What an excellent, excellent review! Really insightful and just amazing. As I read this I quickly forgot that English isn't your first language. I love German people, very decent folks. And yeah, t..."

I'm sorry for my late answer, but because of GR's notification system I sometimes miss comments even though I look carefully. :/
Thank you for your kind words! I'm happy if my rambling strucks a chord. :D
I'm not German. :P I'm Spanish and I live in Switzerland, so German is one of my most used languages.
The sexism was even for its time outdated and yes, even for Japanese standards. Even if he meant it as criticism, the author would have to change a lot of things so that it's clear. A good example that comes to mind about an author writing from the POV of a character that is meant to be disliked is Nabokov with Lolita. Nabokov was an expert with language, Suzuki not so much...

Rodrigo wrote: "Sadako forced him because she wanted to be a mother, if I'm not mistaken. -not that it makes things any better-. Also I might be wrong, but the first dude from the theatre group did rape her :-/......"

The thing is: We don't KNOW if she truly wanted all these things. It's the interpretation of the narrator and the author, based upon very flimsy argumentation and poor understanding of psyche and women in general.
Sure, the author says Sadako wanted this all along but because he created Sadako to be nothing but a cardboard cut-out instead of a real person so she could do what he needed her to do: be evil and "mysterious". The problem is also, that Sadako's revenge plan - if it really was one - is ridiculous. Everything about it didn't feel as something Sadako came up with. I felt the authorial hand messing in this very strongly.

Actually, he wanted to rape her but it's left open if he did. My guess is that he tried and failed but I admit, it's very well possible that he did rape her.
I would have to re-read it to be sure but in all honesty, I don't like the book enough to plough through it again. :P

Thanks for your comment!


Katherine Leslie Cheung I'm not fazed by the sexism part at all. It's Japan. It's normal in Japan. Notice how the journalist NEVER mentions that he loved his wife? Because Japanese culture is like that (at least in the past it was). Guys marry women for their motherly qualities - will she be an obedient wife? A good mother? Romantic feelings - love - don't come into play. I despise that, but I totally am not surprised by it in the book.


message 7: by Gretel (last edited Dec 29, 2015 04:12AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Gretel Katherine Leslie wrote: "I'm not fazed by the sexism part at all. It's Japan. It's normal in Japan. Notice how the journalist NEVER mentions that he loved his wife? Because Japanese culture is like that (at least in the pa..."

It's not about being surprised sexism is in the book, it's about the normalcy in which women are dismissed as annoying, stupid whiny bitches or evil sex demons.
And just becaue a society - Japanese or Western because let's be real here, the West has still a lot to work on sexism, too - is sexist does not mean I can't criticize it. In fact, that is the moment one should criticize it the most: when a form of discrimination is so normal/interalized it's not even visible anymore. And just because Japan has issues with gender equality, does not mean I have to let it pass. Even for Japanese standards this is blatant overly sexist because there already were enough young women rising at that time and defying the cut-out model for their lives.

It shouldn't be normal anymore to have such a sexist book - becaue it's not just one character but the whole book - and just shrug it off. If you don't care about the sexism in the book that's your right to feel that way, but I'm not okay with the sexism so I voiced my opinion.
Because in my opinion dismissing an important issue with "it's normal" (similar to "boys will be boys" when boys/men threaten girls or even abuse them) will help absolutely nobody and I prefer discussing these things because when the status quo is shitty I will talk about its shittiness.


Asghar Abbas Gretel wrote: "Asghar wrote: "What an excellent, excellent review! Really insightful and just amazing. As I read this I quickly forgot that English isn't your first language. I love German people, very decent fol..."

Oh, I know all about GR notifications :P

Ah, a Spaniard living in Switzerland, wonderful. How many languages do you speak ? I wish I spoke more than two.

Oh yeah, yours was a very constructive review, I think it is by far one of the best and most honest reviews for this book. I agree with all your points. This novel was more problematic than true horror.


Gretel Asghar wrote: "Gretel wrote: "Asghar wrote: "What an excellent, excellent review! Really insightful and just amazing. As I read this I quickly forgot that English isn't your first language. I love German people, ..."

At the moment six: Spanish, German, Italian, English, French, and Japanese.
Unfortunately, I forgot most of my Russian but I hope to get back into it and hopefully add a few more languages to my skills. :3
Speaking two languages is already better than most people! I just happen to live as a foreigner here and be skilled and interested in languages so I got lucky. XD

Thank you, you're very kind! I'm glad you like it so much. I think all reviewers know how much hard work and time goes into reviews and for somebody to appreciate it is worth the effort. :D

Yes, this novel isn't really horror, or not in the sense the author intended it. I must say, the only scene where I felt uneasy was during a flashback. It was when one of the actors of the theatre group caught Sadako staring at a turned off TV and she smiled without saying a word. That was unsettling and creepy!
The rest...well, horror in another sense. :)


Asghar Abbas Gretel wrote: "Asghar wrote: "Gretel wrote: "Asghar wrote: "What an excellent, excellent review! Really insightful and just amazing. As I read this I quickly forgot that English isn't your first language. I love ..."

Six languages that's really really amazing, I am impressed both as a reader and as a writer. Words and skills, and what a skill indeed. I am thinking how handy this must be when reading original content, because sometimes some of the magic gets lost in translation.

Oh yeah, writing reviews is not easy, your Ring's one covered all the sentient points flaws and strengths.

Horror in another way, absolutely and yesss that scene her turning the TV on and off, that was creepy. Um, now I am a little spooked lol


message 11: by Gretel (last edited Feb 05, 2018 01:34AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Gretel REST OF THE REVIEW IN THIS COMMENT!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, Japanese society and media had killed her mother and since everyone is evil she wanted to take revenge. Now, Sadako is intersex, a fact that has been hinted twice. Once where a friend of Asakawa describes her (he looks at a photo from her time during the theatre group) as unbelievably beautiful (like every other guy in the story) in a very exaggerated creepy way, but she lacks “motherly qualities�. What the hell does that mean, you ask?

I don’t know, but apparently you can see “motherly qualities� in the face of a woman and if they are not there then clearly she is no real woman, because woman = mother. Always and forever. Being woman means looking a certain way.

In another scene Ryuji says the Greeks thought the perfect being was male and female (I’m sure you know the tale), but Asakawa is disgusted (!) of the thought of women with manly bits. And then, when they found out Sadako was intersex, Asakawa is not only disgusted and says “she is not a reaaaal woman, cause testicles�, but also that of course, as a woman she must have wanted children, but since she was intersex she couldn’t have any (intersex cannot procreate).

So, we have a woman, but not a reaaaal woman, cause she lacks “motherly qualities� in her facial features, who wants to have kids, although it is NEVER stated by her (not written, or retold by somebody else, or any other proof), but by two men who never met her, because clearly EVERY woman wants children, and she seeks revenge on whole fucking Japan, because her father forced Shizuko to perform and she failed, so fuck media and all the Japanese and their skepticism.

The plot boils down to: woman wants babies but can’t have any, and she irrationally blames everyone for her mother’s death, so she gets herself raped by a man with smallpox and therefore immediately gets smallpox herself, and then immediately gets herself killed. Her angry spirit and the angry spirit of smallpox (Nagao was the last person in Japan who contracted smallpox, so humans “killed� smallpox, and the virus was angry with the humans for killing it [the actual explanation in the book]) fuse together and make the images on the tape to kill humanity and that video-virus-mutant is Sadako’s child, she so desperately wanted, although there is no proof she wanted any children or take revenge or any of the claims by Asakawa and Ryuji.



Apart from being incredibly sexist in every way, even for 1991, these two men have zero proof for their interpretation. And while some might argue “maybe that was intentional, all the sexism and this incredibly stupid apologies for rape, etc�, I want to make clear that if that is the case, Suzuki failed in making it clear.

It does not come off as a criticism towards the “male gaze� and sexism in Japan, rape culture, and all the other stuff, but rather as a genuine explanation of why Sadako behaved this way. There is no voice � from characters, the narrative voice, or author � to show any other perspective of the topic. No ambiguity or doubt.

Sadako wanted children (although she never expressed this wish), because woman. She wanted revenge (although never expressed), because clearly she was angry and the evil media and scientists and women are sooo moody! She MUST have wanted to be raped, because she can see into the future, manipulate and hear thoughts, etc.

Only that we never get to know what she actually can. What the limits are or what she thinks or feels.

Sadako speaks exactly once in a retelling of the rape by Nagano. She says “I’m thirsty. My throat is dry.� (translated from German). That’s it. That’s fucking it.

I’m not the kind of person who gets pissed when females aren’t part of every story (I remember a woman claiming that Eco’s The Name of the Rose is sexist, because there are no women and no story where there are only men, should be written…that is absolutely idiotic) [Short tangent here: funny how I think that this point changed drastically and I would argue differently now and make another case. In fact, there's seldom a reason for an all-male cast and since I haven't read The Name of the Rose, YET, I can't speak in favour or against the woman's argument. But I guess that book is a rare case since TNotR is about monks living several centuries ago and women weren't living with them. But otherwise, my opinion on this topic has changed these last few years but I didn't want to just delete this criticism but point out that I have a new approach to the topic while keeping my mistake visible. When I wrote this review, I stood behind my opinion, now I have another contrary to my old beliefs and I think it's interesting to mention it to see how one develops.], nor do I think that men shouldn’t write women’s POV, because good authors (female or male) can and should do both. Nor does every character need to talk. It can be interesting when they don’t.

It would have been in this case, because Sadako is supposed to be an almost mythical, god-like being, but it still fails. She is mute and all we know about her is from the standpoint of men and men only, and these men have shown sexist behavior, considered as normal, and give her a voice. For them Sadako must have wanted this and that and there is no real proof of that. But instead of acknowledging the lack of proof, Suzuki makes it clear: Yes, the video shows everything we need to know and since the video kills, Sadako wants to kill, so she wanted to die and get raped to kill�



Why would she?

Why would she blame society and media for her father’s mistake?

Why would she kill one rapist and not the other?

Why would she want to have children?

How far into the future does she see? Months? Years? Did she as a 5-year-old know she was going to die at the age of 19? How exactly do her powers work? What are the limits?

Why on earth would Sadako go to Tokyo and join a theatre group if she can see the future? She knew she would fail as an actress � as told by another male theatre group member � because she does not show feelings, why would she join the group? She should have known she would fail! Why would she risk getting raped by a group member, if she can see into the future?

So, she can see getting smallpox from Nagao, merging with the disease and create creepy video tapes to kill people but not the theatre group and attempted rape? Why not go solely for the rape and waste time with a fruitless task she knew she was going to fail?

Why not kill people with her powers? No one can prove anything, so she can go on a killing spree through Tokyo, killing off all journalists who bad mouthed her mother, without getting up from her couch?

Why do Asakawa and Ryuji think that OF COURSE it’s logical if you think of suicide after what happened to her, and it’s not normal NOT to want to kill yourself?



The book doesn’t care.

Sadako knew so she wanted it.



5. What I liked

I like the video and a very creepy moment with Sadako, which is retold by a member of the theatre group. Honestly, I love the idea of the book, but the execution is terrible. There is so much potential, wasted on pubescent level of philosophical discourse. Everything is either white or black. Media is bad. Science is bad. Humans are bad. We are all stupid and bad. Poor Sadako.

The writing style is all over the place. Too much “Show, don’t tell� and assumptions that do not base on logic, but rather on stereotypes, deep rooted in the minds of Japanese middle-class men.

What I did like are the references to Japanese society and current events, which is interesting for me as someone who studies Japanese Studies and knows a little more. Also the hints on literary discourse is fascinating. It feels like a little puzzle, I enjoyed that.

All in all, I’m sad, because the main story has so much potential and it’s wasted on Asakawa’s constant whining and bitching, illogical plot, and more illogically behaving characters.

There is no character I liked. None. And while Ryuji is presented as a kinda likable asshole rapist, I despise Asakawa more, because he is presented as a slightly douchy but overall “nice guy�, but in fact, he is the worst of them all. He has no respect for anybody, not his family, not his grieving wife’s sister, not his boss � he doesn’t care for anybody but himself and his career. Even his daughter is an annoyance and it doesn’t change the fact that he gets teary when he things she might die. He cares zero for her and never helps doing anything in the house or with the baby, but lo and behold, his daughter might die and then suddenly he kinda wants to save her, but still, his suffering is sooo much worse than anybody else’s.

I hate it when an author tries to make me like a self-absorbed asshole by making him the “career driven nice guy�. It fails. Always.





Conclusion?



This would have needed a major rewrite for a solid plot, writing style, and exploration of the full potential lurking in the depths of the story.


message 12: by Eule (new)

Eule Luftschloss Thank you very much from preventing me from reading this. I feel the urge to gift people who know the author extra door locks.


message 13: by Sasha (new)

Sasha Wow, I don't remember it like that, but then again I read (and enjoyed) the trilogy about 15 odd years ago. I quite liked the way it was written and how it eventually all tied together.
Tbf I never saw any of the movies other than the American remake of the first book that I did not enjoy at all, so I have nothing to compare it to. I guess if I were to read it these days I might not enjoy it as much as I did way back when.


Gretel There are books I liked 15+ years ago that I've been re-reading this past few months and I did not like them this time around. So you might feel differently now, yes. Some books only work when you're younger or haven't seen/read much within a specific genre.
I had a very enlightening experience re-reading HP, to pick one example.
For me, the book is a mess on many levels. On a technical one, the book fails, too. They jump to impossible conclusion which are never based on the evidence they find. Their interpretation is expressed as facts. The themes were all over the place. There's always a dissonance and things don't fit together.
Ring had potential and I thought that it was ultimately wasted in writing a mediocre, convoluted B movie plot - at best.

I don't really talk about the movies here but that would be another interesting topic, not only in terms of quality but themes discussed since the vary quite a lot from the books in some cases. I'd even say some changes in adaptation worked for the best, while others fucked up the little themes Ring had.


message 15: by Sasha (new)

Sasha Oh yeah for sure, I'm not doubting your review.
Have you read the whole trilogy? I remember being fascinated by it, as it was quite out there when I read them (which, I think, was in the late 90s, early 2000s). Those concepts of genetics (book 2) and technology (book 3) were, if anything, just emerging in other movies so I think this is why I remember them in a positive light. I tend to forget details if they didn't bug me too much at the time, but the overall feeling of the trilogy was one of "damn, finally something new, something I've never read or conceived of!". But of course we're in 2019 now, so I guess this wouldn't be considered all that new. I do think they do answer some of the plotholes and weird things you notice throughout the first book, but I might look at the trilogy with my rosy glasses of nostalgia, so chances are the other books - and the trilogy as a whole - are just as bad :/


message 16: by Sasha (new)

Sasha *movies and books


back to top