ŷ

Laura Leaney's Reviews > Silence

Silence by Shūsaku Endō
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3633494
's review

it was amazing

This is an intense - rather grim - epistolary novel written mostly from the vantage point of a Roman Catholic priest, a missionary to Japan, early in the 17th century. The events are based on historical facts and the characters on actual people. The succinct introduction by translator William Johnston reveals that the novel begins after the period when daiymo Toyotomi Hideyoshi, who had once allowed the Christian missionaries much privilege, had twenty-six Japanese and European Christians crucified. Apparently there "stands a monument to commemorate the spot where they died" to this day. Although missionary work continued, there began a savage effort to exterminate Christianity from Japan. The first executions created too many martyrs, so the Japanese officials attempted to force the Christians to apostatize by stamping or pressing their foot on a depiction of Christ or the Virgin, a fumie. If not, they were wrapped tightly and hung upside down in a pit filled with excrement until they signaled their apostasy (with their one free hand) or died.

The novel opens with two priests willing to risk capture and death to keep Christ's flame burning. They are Sebastian Rodrigues and Francisco Garrpe, both Portuguese. Crossing the "leaden sea," they entrust themselves to Kichijiro, a Japanese Christian who wears a "servile grin." Pax Christi. What happens to these men in Japan is beautiful and terrible. The letters of Rodrigues are testament to the powerful writing of Endō and show the priest's anguish as God remains silent in the face of so much suffering. He writes: "I knew well, of course, that the greatest sin against God was despair; but the silence of God was something I could not fathom." Rodrigues is plagued by his inability to understand. His journey to Japan parallels the suffering of Christ, his dealings with Judas, as well as his interviews with Roman officials. It is not a good outcome, but the ending blew me away.

Here's an important question to the faithful: If you could save men and women from slow torture by stepping on the fumie and apostatizing, would you do it? Or would you hold your ground while listening to their agonizing moans? Does God want you to help the suffering of human beings or does God want you to keep your foot off His image? What a terrible situation for a Christian priest. At one point Rodrigues is forced to watch the death of Japanese Christian martyrs as they are wrapped alive in matting and dropped into the sea. He cannot shake the vision of it, and he sees the "sea stretched out endlessly, sadly; and all this time, over the sea, God simply maintained his unrelenting silence.[. . .] 'Eloi, Eloi, lama sabacthani!' The priest had always thought that these words were that man's prayer, not that they issued from terror at the silence of God."

If you grew up Roman Catholic, as I did, this book will strike a strong chord in you. The questions that Rodrigues asks are the questions we all wanted to ask. My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? Like Dostoyevsky, Endō shows the existential condition of man as alien in the world, lonely, and horribly in need of comfort. More than anything else, Silence is food for thought.
137 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Silence.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 19, 2015 – Shelved
June 19, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
August 4, 2015 – Started Reading
August 4, 2015 –
page 27
12.33%
August 6, 2015 –
page 80
36.53%
August 8, 2015 –
page 160
73.06%
August 13, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Mmars I read this quite a few years ago and still think of it occasionally, though I'd forgotten the title. Fascinating history that I had been clueless to


Laura Leaney Yes, me too. Sadly, most of my vision of old Japan comes from my teenage readings of James Clavell.


message 3: by Steve (new)

Steve Great review. I read this years ago, and was reminded of it again by a couple of short stories I just read in Rashomon and Seventeen Other Stories


Laura Leaney The fact that the book is still with you - years later - is a testament to it's gripping narrative and imagery. I thought it was a genuinely powerful novel.


Josiah As a Reformed Christian, I believe that any image of the deity is a sin and hence the fumie isn't God or a true image since it breaks the second commandment, so if I put myself in their shoes so would have no issues stepping on it.
That's the issue with Catholicism, they have many false images that leads them into sin.
This was a good book and it showed me a different perspective.


Laura Leaney Josiah,
Sadly, these priests are stuck within the parameters of Roman Catholicism - and the old ways of valuing an image or a relic as "sacred" made for some bizarre behaviors. I'm with you. An image is not a "true" thing. A human being is a true thing though.


Jonathan This book was a really challenging read...

Still difficult for me to face the reality which was the impetus for this book...

I think the real issue is not whether we step on the fumie, but what stepping on the fumie was meant to declare... it was meant to be a declaration that one was turning away from his or her faith in God.

The fumie is nothing, it's just an object, but the real questions are, "what is the nature of faith," "who is God and what does He require from us as His followers," and "what does faithfulness to God look like?"

For me, I want to hope I would be willing to die, even willing to watch others die, before I would deny my Lord and savior.

Not because I am stubborn in my desire to be principled... but because I believe God is transcendently holy and good. He is also the One who raises the dead and comforts all those who are suffering for Him.

It is, I really believe, ultimately better to suffer with and for God, than to deny Him. Even in the case of watching others suffering before us, I believe God can take care of them and in their suffering and in their dying draw them to Himself.

There are worse evils than physical suffering and death. But this takes real faith, and grace which can only be received never taken.

And all of this which is why this book, for me, was so difficult to read, because I fear physical suffering and watching others suffer in the ways described in this book is unfathomable for us who have not experienced those situations for ourselves.

Such a challenging read.


Laura Leaney Jonathan - Thanks for such thoughtful comments. I agree that the fumie is just an object. Roman Catholics would also agree that stepping on the image is a "declaration" of one's rejection of God; however, in this instance, God must know that the priest stepping on the object is not rejecting HIm but saving human lives through the pretense. I cannot (although I may be solo here) think that God would value the ritual gesture over compassion. I am grateful I've never had to face such an agonizing decision.


Emmy Silence is a cerebral book.
The book is based on the historical fact that officials in Japan tried to exterminate Christianity in the 17th century. The major character is father Sebastian Rodrigues, a Jesuit priest, sailed to Japan with another priest, father Garrupe, to give christians there the support they terribly need and to find out the truth about a beloved teacher, the older father Ferreira. What follows next is a story of anguish on the side of idealistic father Rodriguez- and brutality in the side of the Japanese.
The novel raises the eternal question of the "silence" of God. Other themes are the system of belief and its ability to sustain us in times of need, how much are our decisions self-serving and to what lengths will we go to justify our decisions to ourselves.
Father Rodriguez suffers mentally and is tormented by his inability to answer his own questions. He tries not to judge father Ferreira- but ends up apostatizing as well.
The book does not answer the questions it raises and that's why it keeps haunting us after reading.
Shusaku Endo masterfully draws characters and explains their deepest thoughts. His writing is beautiful even in translation.
I may not be as obsessed with the book like Martin Scorsese but I highly recommend it to serious readers. I hope the movie does not disappoint!


Laura Leaney I agree, Emmy - it is deeply haunting. I'm still somewhat shocked that there will be a movie. So much of the book's power (for me) is located in the language and imagery. Should be interesting. Your comment should be its own review!


message 11: by John (new)

John Johnson Laura, I endured the movie yesterday (spoiler alert), and I thought the movie presented a tragedy on many levels. The priests publicly renounced their faith until death. This in itself is shameful, but their service is somehow revered as honorable by Rome. When the main character is buried, he is seen clutching an icon of the crucifix, as if holding an icon is faith. This is a delusion. The other tragedy was how the people were trained that they only had hope if they had a priest present or could clutch a religious symbol. It was said, "If the priests/missionaries die, the church dies." No, Christ's true Church will never die, because He is head of the Church, and will take care of her. Martyrdom may happen, but there will always be a remnant, even in the face of persecution. When believers place all their faith in priests and icons, they are completely robbed of their right to approach the Throne of Grace through Jesus for themselves. Jesus specifically stated that we are to come to Him personally and find rest, not look to or depend upon others. (Matthew 11:28, Acts 4:12, Hebrews 4:14-16, John 6:35-37. The movie definitely gives pause to consider the potential cost of following Christ though. It was an eternal movie to watch, and had a depressing ending with the sense that Buddhism won the victory.


Laura Leaney John, the book is also somewhat depressing in the ways you mention, but I think the complexity of the theology involved may be significantly more nuanced than the movie (which I haven't seen yet). I completely agree that icons and the other physical objects of veneration do not constitute genuine Christianity. They are only things. Your penultimate line is key though. The "potential cost to following Christ" seems inevitably sacrificial. Pain is always the result, it seems to me, but additionally it's antithesis: joy. Sacrifices for a greater love bring both.

Speaking of Buddhism, I read a book once called Living Buddha, Living Christ that showed the parallels between the two. At times, the analogy was strained but every once in a while it worked!


message 13: by Maria (new) - added it

Maria Worthy I saw the movie this afternoon. The knot in my throat is still there. I was a born Catholic. We have pictures and crucifix in my house. Those images are merely a reminder of the visual faith. By no means we ever think they are gods or something worshipable. To step on any of those images to save a life, yes, I'll do it without hesitation. But, it is different from the priests who lived more than three hundred years ago. The Buddhism, still do, think images are gods and worship them. When they were asked to step on the picture of Christ, is to show the faithful that even a priest admits that his faith is a false. I feel sorry for them in that situation. But I'm released for what he did. My own brother is a priest and i pray to God never put him into that situation. Thanks to the blood of Christ and all the martyrs, hopefully there's no more blood.


Margaret Sonnemann This is a book I’m still thinking about two,years later, a tribute to the author and translator. Stepping on the image is not all there was to it, and I agree an image is nothing. But stepping on the fume was a renunciation of everything, including a commitment to spending the rest of their lives writing renunciations to everything that was dearer than life to them. Imagining if God would ever want me to save lives, imaging my granddaughters being tortured, for example, reminded me of Paul saying he felt he could see himself damned if Israel could be saved. Rom 9:3. But now I think that what he was saying is that feeling this intensity of love and self sacrifice is normal, not that we should actually do it as the characters in Silence did. We aren’t to do evil that good may come. I don’t agree with George MacDonald on everything but some of the things he has written are quite profound. And his reflections on Luke 4 helped me with this: Jesus� second temptation in the wilderness. He questioned why this could be something that would possibly even tempt Jesus at all. His answer was that at that point Jesus could put a stop to all suffering of all humanity immediately instead of just trusting in the timing of God. Which is the temptation the apostisizing priests gave in to, to take responsibility on themselves that really belongs to the Father. Such a challenging book.


back to top