ŷ

Mike's Reviews > Doomsday Book

Doomsday Book by Connie Willis
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
545336
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: scifi, xcharity-2011

I am very concerned. I read “The Doomsday Book� time travel saga, eagerly anticipating it based on the many ŷ reviews that highly praise this story. Many reviewers whom I trust rave about this book. I just didn’t see it at all, not a bit. Not only was it supremely boring, but annoying. The first 120 pages can be summarized: “something is wrong�. During the next 180 pages, the rest of the characters realize there is “something wrong�. Yawn! I felt like slapping virtually every character in the book at one point or three to stop whinging and get on with a rescue. I didn’t care for any except the village priest and, just barely, the main character, Kivrin. Willis made Britain and the British so depressing, not the Britain I have visited. This is a multiple award winner, including the Nebula Award and I can’t imagine why. There is nothing “amazing� in this story. The science is minimal and never explained. The technology of 2054 was not impressive at all. I at least expected some interesting adventure in medieval times but nada. So I come back to questioning, what am I missing here?
88 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Doomsday Book.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 28, 2010 – Shelved
May 3, 2011 – Started Reading
May 3, 2011 – Finished Reading
May 21, 2011 – Shelved as: scifi
January 20, 2012 – Shelved as: xcharity-2011

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Emma Victory It's 2054 not 2024. One of the points you're missing is that the book is not about technological advances. It's about humanity.


Mike Isis wrote: "It's 2054 not 2024. One of the points you're missing is that the book is not about technological advances. It's about humanity."

Thanks for the correction on dates. I expect an award winner to be amazing and just didn't get that here.


Tracey I loved the book - but I also enjoyed your review. You're not wrong: an award winner should knock it out of the park, and if it doesn't what might have been "okay" is . Expectations are bound to affect your rating.


Mike Tracey wrote: "I loved the book - but I also enjoyed your review. You're not wrong: an award winner should knock it out of the park, and if it doesn't what might have been "okay" is . Expectations are bound to af..."

Thanks Tracey, glad you enjoyed the book. I agree with you about expectations affecting the rating.


Marick See, this is why I no longer pay any attention to ratings/reviews before finishing a book to completion. Expectations can and often do kill a book for me. One such example is that book "Wool" everyone is reading these days. I let myself get excited and was extremely disappointed.

Sorry you didn't like this book. It's one of my favourites! Then again, I bought it years ago and knew nothing of it :)


Strona po stronie I didn't really get this book's message...


Mike Joanna wrote: "I didn't really get this book's message..."

Neither did I.


message 8: by fezfox (new)

fezfox Once you said "nebula award winner" it all became clear


message 9: by Joe (new)

Joe Krakovsky Maybe you need to be smoking something to really understand it?


back to top